Bridge Exports Changes Resolution from 300 to 72 dpi, resizing my image

I like to use Bridge (CS5) to export my photographs for printing, and frequently I will use the Export feature to resize the images (e.g., 5x7 vs full size), but every time I export it recharacterizes the images as 72 dpi, vs the 300 dpi I prefer. 
Consistent with some of the previous postings (~2 yrs ago) I have seen on this topic the exported images are now "sized" much bigger (29"x20" for what should have been ~5"x7"), and hence expectantly I haven't lost any resolution, but it's aggrevating to have the dpi changed.
Can anyone tell me how to export without having the dpi changed?
And while I'm at it, can anyone confirm that I'm not loosing image resolution?
Thanks so much!!

Can anyone tell me how to export without having the dpi changed?
Can't find any other settings to change and just having tested it I can confirm that it sets ppi (it is pixels per inch -ppi- for a digital file which is made from pixels and dots per inch -dpi- from the ink dots of a print ) to 72.
And while I'm at it, can anyone confirm that I'm not loosing image resolution?
You already stated yourself that you did not loose pixels, therefor the size of the files stays the same. It is just a mater of figures. 300 ppi means a larger concentration per inch and 72 pixels per inch means a smaller concentration of pixels per inch. Given the same amount of pixels for both settings this means a smaller image dimension for 300 ppi and a larger image dimension for the 72 ppi.
300 ppi is some 'magic' number from printed press, but it really depends on the need of the job related printing machine. If you have a small image and need to look closely it should have a larger concentration per inch to reflect its sharpness.
However theoretically you would almost have the same visible quality when printed on 72 at billboard sizes. That's because you always have a large distance between your eyes and the bill board. If you look closely you will see the dots (because the billboard is a product of ink dots…) but of course it is not meant to study at that close range.
The same is for judging sharpness on your computer. Ideally you do so at 100 % for correct judgement at real size pixels. But in reality there will be almost no situation you will study a print at that same distance
Any thoughts on why these would be different?   And am I fretting over things unncessarily?
Only guesses, the use a different algorithm or calculation scheme, in my case I tried a Canon Raw (converted to DNG) without any ACR settings then the basics applied and found that Bridge export jpeg 11 creates larger files then using PS.
But there are some other concerns I have and that certainly would make me fretting in use of export module:
First of all I almost never use it, merely in this cases for testing, because using the menu tools give a shortcut to Photoshop / Batch and inhere I have created several dedicated resizing and resaving actions that also places the files in preset folders.
But with this small test I found out that
a: it changes ppi to 72 ppi, not a very big deal but I did not asked for it nor did I wanted it.
b: it converts my Adobe RGB color space to sRGB and I certainly did not want that without my explicit wish for this conversion, so this is more then a bit worrying to my concern.
c: it seems to apply a sharpness that I certainly did not want to happen without my knowledge, and this rules the use of the export module out completely.
Since I only tried a DNG file without settings or retouch/developing  in Photoshop the jpeg generated by PS was not very sharp. This makes sense to me because I have set my basic ACR to apply sharpening only to preview. There are a lot of different sharpening theories around but I use one in PS itself. So I was a bit shocked to learn that the export module did all those for me unwanted and not adjustable settings putting me completely out of control…
So if you want to have full control about things happening under the hood yourself just start creating actions in PS, it is very easy to record an action and even more easier to play it. Instead of every time dragging files to export module and always recheck the image options (it seems to reset itself always to jpeg quality 8 on my system) only select the files you want to resize and choose menu tool / Photoshop Batch and select the wanted action. hit OK and your almost done, PS does the rest.
The great thing of the latest PS CS6 action pallet is the extension with a so called 'insert conditional' that let's you create an 'if - then else' action for both landscape and portrait resizing actions so you don't need the 'constrain to fit' or 'fit image' option. Just once create an action for both resizing dimensions and then create a new action with insert conditional. choose If image is landscape play action…. / else play action….
It is really a very productive way. I have a lot of actions (organized in sets for better overview) and even one that creates 4 different sizes in 4 different folders using 1 go in Bridge

Similar Messages

  • Save for Web & Devices is changing resolution from 72ppi to 300ppi

    Hi,
    I'm writing an action to do the following.
    Image size - change resolution from 300ppi to 72ppi
    Automate - Fit Image - 600px x 600px
    Save for web and devices - JPEG medium.
    If I save at any stage (up to save for web & devices) the image is 72ppi
    However when I open it again after saving for web & devices and check image size it's 300ppi HOW?
    Am I missing something really stupid?
    Peter

    Hi Charles,
    Sometimes we have to go through meaningless steps...
    The spec for the job is to "automate" a process whereby we end up with a web suitable 600px JPEG of about 50k with © watermark.
    Of course they are expecting a 72ppi image, so its easier if thats what they get!!!
    The other requirement involves the fact that the web end of the business want to change the filename, so in order to keep a link, I write the filename to IPTC Title Field (using Peter Krogh's script)
    However I've now found that if I "save for web & devices" with copyright & contact info, I get IPTC title and 72ppi,
    So happy days....
    Many thanks, but now just more curious to know exactly whats happening!
    Peter

  • How can I change resolution from 72 ppi to 144 ppi?

    Adobe's CS allows me to change the resolution of an image from 72 ppi to 144 ppi (Image | Image Size). Does iPhoto have a similar capability? Terence Delvin has previously posted how to resize an image to a specified dimension (iPhoto 8 | Installing | Resize), but I also need to change the resolution. iPhoto is so wonderful it's a shame to have to export a file and open it in CS if this is all I wish to do. Thanks, in advance.

    BPWMorro wrote:
    Seriously, it is a photo competition where digital images are displayed through a computer/digital projector setup. The organization's requirements (not mine) are 1024 pixels on the longest side and maximum 144 ppi. Adobe resizes like this in both the CS and also Elements and when the file is then saved it keeps the 144 ppi and its size decreases (for example, from 3.22MB to only 751KB). I just would like to make my life simpler and use iPhoto to accomplish the resize.
    OK I see. I am still confused as to their requirement of 144 ppi as the 1024 on the longest size will resize down for you.
    I don't think iPhoto can change the ppi but you can resize down. Pick the photo, go to File -> Export... and then under size pick custom. On the pull down if you pick "dimension" then type in 1024 in the box under that, it will automatically output a new version of your photo with 1024 as the max size and you get a nice smaller file.
    However, the PPI setting remains the same since this is a print setting and when displayed on a monitor or digital projector, it will display at exactly 1024 by whatever the other side is, assuming the program displaying it displays at 100%.
    Let me poke around a bit more and see if I can come up with something.
    Perhaps a simple exif editor (rather than having to open it in Elements or CS) that you can quickly change the PPI setting of the exported image. I'll have to look and see what is available.
    Patrick

  • Export changes sequence from 16:9 to 4:3

    Editing Apple ProRes 422 with mts files converted to mp4.  When I export sequence to mov or mp4, the aspect ratio changes from 16:9 to 4:3 and the picture compresses.  I'm using Export>Quicktime Conversion. Is there a setting I can change to correct this?

    Yes, I couldn't find a way to convert the .mts files to .mov and could only convert them to .mp4.  Appreciate your answer but not completely understanding it. So are you saying I should convert my sequence using Export>Quicktime Converter and change the settings to ProRes, or are you saying I should convert the source files to ProRes somehow?

  • Custom PDF export changes colour from CMYK to RGB!

    I've created a custom PDF output setting (based on the preset "Press") for hi resolution output. The files are created in inDesign CS5 - CMYK and several spot colours too. I can check the output-preview and it looks OK. When I check the output preview of the PDF (or the film/plate seps ahhh!) they have been converted to RGB. How do I keep the separations in CMYK?

    Over the years I've learned plenty of lessons the hard way, and they're the ones that really stick.
    In theory when sending an ad to various publications I'd try to send something that correct to each, but in practice that's essentially impossible, so I tend to convert everything to SWOP 2 (you'd be amazed how many newspapers use SWOP 2 COATED as the working profile in this country), admit that colors will never be perfect or match across multiple pubs because my clients can't afford the costs of making that happen, and leave out the profiles. I'd rather have crisp type than slightly better color from a conversion, but that's me.
    But I do now include the profiles and I use the profile the printer tells me to use - the only way I'd get rich black type, I think, is if the printer ends up using a different profile than what they told me, right?
    That's correct. If that happens, it's time to get another printer.
    Including the profiles - I thought - would somehow let the prepress know "actually this file was made for a different print process". 
    I suppose it might, if they look and if they care.
    Why is the option to include profiles there?
    I think this is really intended for when you DON"t convert colors during export, as with PDF/X-4. If the colors are not yet converted, you need to know the source profile to get the destination color correct.
    I don't want to give anyone the idea that it would be a mortal sin to include profiles as a matter of routine. I just want to point out that doing so MIGHT cause unexpected results in some circumstances and that it's important to know what can go wrong.  Also, there is no guarantee that leaving colors unchanged and including profiles is going to get you good color on the far end. It all comes down to the skill level of the person doing the prepress.

  • Update to FF 23 changed resolution from 1600x900 to 1280x720, increased window size, and made text big and images and videos blurry

    After upgrading to ff 23 from ff21 on my Windows 8 ultrabook laptop, the browser window blew up to fill the entire screen. Web pages stopped displaying properly - text is big, but images are blurry, including those on the ff toolbar, and videos are pixelated and unviewable.
    I tried the layout.css.devPixelsPerPx fix - it didn't work. The text became unreadably small instead.
    I noticed that javascript window resolution in Firefox 23 is showing a resolution of 1280x720 instead of the 1600x900 that it should be. How do I get FF 23 to display in 1600x900 resolution?

    Yes, the screen.width and screen.height are adjusted for the device pixel ratio based on your zoom level. (Demo page: [http://dev.jeffersonscher.com/resolution.html])
    It sounds as though your Firefox 23 is picking up a Windows setting of 125% zoom. If you change layout.css.devPixelsPerPx to 1.0, Firefox should display at your display's native resolution instead of your Windows resolution (100% instead of 125%). This will indeed make the text in the toolbar area a lot smaller, but the content area should look the same as Firefox 21. Does it look a lot different? How much zoom (e.g., Ctrl+) is needed to make it look like you remember?
    Meanwhile, you can use this extension to adjust the toolbar area if you stick with the 1.0 setting: [https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/theme-font-size-changer/ Theme Font & Size Changer]. Clicking its icon and changing the font size from "Normal" to 14 or 15 usually works pretty well. Once you re done with your adjustments, you can use the Customize feature to take its icon off the toolbar. ([[Customize Firefox controls, buttons and toolbars]])

  • Change image from 300 to 72 dpi with Photoshop elements 13?

    Want to buy an image for a Kindle cover which is only available in the size required by Kindle as a 300 dpi image.Can I change It to 72 dpi with my Photoshop elements 13?

    So, on a copy I made of the image I want,I did go to "file", Then "save for Web", and made the long size 800 pixels, and saved that as JPEG..
    But in that particular window, I didn't see "Constrain proportions" anywhere.
    Yesterday,with that image, I did go "image" and then "resize", and did have checked  "constrain proportions". That is, I'm presently working with a resized  image, that includes a few text inserts and one simple custom shape..
    But do I have to start with a fresh, Unedited image?
    You continue to be marvelous help. I'm so grateful.

  • How do I change picture resolution from screen capture?

    If I want to take the image on the screen in Encore CS5 and save it as a photoshop picture the resolution is 70 DPI.  Is there any way to change this resolution?  I would like sharper pictures if possible, 100 DPI to 200 DPI if this can be done.
    Encore CS5
    Core 4 2.4 ghz processor
    6 GB Ram
    700 GB free on hard drive
    Windows 7 64 bit

    I completely agree with your goal - getting as a good a resolution print as possible.  But your focus on dpi for the capture of a frame will not help you.
    Kind of like scanning an image.  If you are going to blow it up later you want to scan at higher resolutions than if you don't.  There is of course image quality versus file size issues, etc. etc. but at least I would have the option to change resolutions on capture.
    Scanning at a higher resolution adds more pixels.  So, for example, scanning a finely detailed 7.2 x 4.8 inch image at 300 dpi produces 2160 x 1440 pixels.  Scan a grainy photograph similarly, and it will be 2160 x 1440 and look lousy.  Use a 5 megapixel camera to shoot the original scene, you've got more pixels.  If you have only the SD video image, all you have is the 720 x 480 pixel image.  It doesn't matter how you set the dpi on capture, just that you capture all 720 x 480 pixels.
    In Premier Pro CS5 and Encore CS5 the image size is 10 inches by 6.667 inches and the resolution is 72 pixels/inch.
    Pulling from womble the image size is 7.2 inches by 4.8 inches and the resolution is 100 pixels/inch.
    The part you are not listing is the fact that for each of those the pixel size is 720x480.  As long as you capture the 720 x 480, the resolution of the image is not improved by flagging it as 72 dpi or 100 dpi.  You can change that in photoshop for either of those captures, and you get a different print size, but no more or less pixels.
    In either case, re-sizing the image in photoshop doesn't change the pixels/inch resolution.  I want to capture the original image in as good resolution as possible rather than having to correct it after capture.
    "As good resolution as possible" is 720 x 480.

  • Image resolution from 72 to 300 for print

    hello photoshopers.
    if i am to print a large banner or Billboard that will be 10meters by 5meters height.lets say i do my documents settings 10cm x 5cm 72dpi in order for the mac to work faster,could i later change the document settings to 300dpi or would my print come out pixelated?
    is it recomended to change the resolution from 72  to 300 at the end of a project?
    thank you.

    You have to do the Math in your scaling ratio.  What you have to do is achieve around 100ppi image resolution at 100% final size for grand format billboard output.  You could get away with 72ppi image resolution, so if your scale is 400% ( or file size @ 25% ); a 300ppi image res in the file will work.  Now, to answer your question...no.  Final resolution should be pre-determined at file construction / origination.  So, if you want 300dpi document resolution at 100%; the file resolution should be 1200dpi / 300ppi min.  Try to get in the habit of preparing your files this way.  You should know going in what your final resolution requirements are for each project.  It is faster to work at 72dpi, however, I'm not sure it is a good idea because Raster effects usually do not regenerate well sizing up to 300dpi later on.

  • How do I resize/change resolution of photos from iPhoto when used in iWeb

    I am shooting with a 7.1 Mega Pixel Canon to get enough quality to crop and print high quality pictures of my baby daughter and her adventures in the world.
    I have a website up made with iWeb, but when I select the photos in iPhoto and go Share / Sent to iWeb / photo page - I get a nice layout of the photos but at full resolution when the thumbnails are selected or the slide show is run. Although nice and sharp, this is a pain for anyone looking at the site even with high speed access.
    There must be some way to resize photos, but I have yet to figure that out with iPhoto, let alone iWeb. And as one photo at a time is a pain, there must also be a way to rescale a whole selection of photos that I want to use for a page - say her Disneyworld trip. I can't be the first person to run into this, but I have not found anything out there to point me in the right direction.
    Ideally I wold like to create a resized set from the originals - so I can still print and crop in high qulity. I also am not really sure what resolution would be best or easy viewing and download - that's probably subjective. 1200x800 comes to mind but I am open to suggestions.
    Perhaps resize is not the right term - changing resolution is probably more accurate, but there too I have not found an answer.
    Appreciate the help and suggestions.

    dan28088,
    Tried your site on two different browsers, using highspeed broadband; the site is, indeed, extaordinarily slow. We can dissect the thing down to the last file, but it won't change anything, as far as I can see. If it were me, I would host the site on another server. The .Mac servers are just plain slow, period. I think that is the primary problem here. Just my opinion, others may disagree.
    I created a new site this past weekend for a new project, and published it to .Mac. It contains a lot of jpeg files in slideshows (along with the usual png suspects!) . After reviewing it a few times, and not being satisfied with page-load speeds, I published to a folder and uploaded the site to space on 1&1 WebHosting.
    The page-load speeds TRIPLED. That's right...3X as fast page-load speeds. Even large, linked to files, 3MB+, load within a reasonable amount of time. (seconds)
    I still will keep a .Mac subscription, as I like and use all of the other features of the iDisk. But for serious website hosting, I think you will be better 'served' with a remote host. Your money with .Mac is certainly not wasted; the syncing services and other features of iDisk space that integrate with your local files are well worth the yearly fee. Again, only one user's opinion, based on experience.
    Mark

  • Change scan resolution from HP Scan App iMac

    I use the HP SCAN app to scan from my Photosmart.  I like it because it lets me crop to constrained size.  However, it seems to scan only at 200 DPI.  I want a higher scan resolution.  I know how to change it through System Preferences, but HP SCAN does not use those settings. How to I adjust the scan resolution from WITHIN HP SCAN application?

    OK, from the HP Scan software click the Scan button.From there click the Down arrow () or the Show Details button to view and change any scan settings, including the scan resolution.   

  • Exporting Changes from Crystal 8.5 and Crystal 10

    Post Author: spentmotiff
    CA Forum: Exporting
    Please forgive me if this was in the Tech. Database; I searched but did not see any information pertaining to this.
    I have recently upgraded from Crystal Reports 8.5 to Crystal 10 and have noticed that when exporting a report as a CSV file, the formatting has changed in Crystal 10 versus Crystal 8.5. The problem with this is that I am first exporting the file from Crystal Reports as a CSV file and then importing this file into another report that I must then send to my State Government; since upgrading to Crystal 10, the formatting changes are causing my export file to lose columns and data. I have tried manually changing the CSV file to no avail.
    Any insight or information into having my Crystal Reports 10 Export file match the Crystal Reports 8.5 format will be greatly appreciated.

    Hi Sharon,
    Your question is answered in this thread:
    [Can you run CRXIR1 and CRXIR2 on the same machine?;
    Hope that helps!!
    Regards,
    Shweta

  • How can I change my Camera resolution from very high to lower for email use.

    How can I change my Iphone 4-8gb Camera resolution from very high to lower for emailing?  it is now 26-- x 19-- approx..

    Are both of your Apple routers configured for an extended or roaming network?

  • Change grub resolution from within grub console

    Hello!
    I'm looking for a way to change the grub resolution from within the grub console. Note, that I am not looking for a way to change the grub resolution in the config files!
    This is why I'm asking: my laptop stopped booting whenever the grub resolution is not set to 800x600x32. This is very strange and I do not know the reason for this issue. It hasn't been a problem so far, because I'm just using the config file to set the resolution to 800x600x32.
    Now I'm trying to reinstall, but the live discs won't boot since the resolution of grub is not 800x600x32. I tried dropping to console and typing
    set gfxmode=800x600x32
    set gfxpayload=keep
    load_video
    insmod gfxterm
    but nothing happens.
    So the question is: Is there any way to change the resolution of grub from its own console? Or is there a way to manipulate the live images before burning them in order to start grub with the desired resolution?
    Thanks so much!
    Last edited by mjb (2013-10-09 19:00:15)

    mjb wrote:
    Hello!
    I'm looking for a way to change the grub resolution from within the grub console. Note, that I am not looking for a way to change the grub resolution in the config files!
    This is why I'm asking: my laptop stopped booting whenever the grub resolution is not set to 800x600x32. This is very strange and I do not know the reason for this issue. It hasn't been a problem so far, because I'm just using the config file to set the resolution to 800x600x32.
    Now I'm trying to reinstall, but the live discs won't boot since the resolution of grub is not 800x600x32. I tried dropping to console and typing
    set gfxmode=800x600x32
    set gfxpayload=keep
    load_video
    insmod gfxterm
    but nothing happens.
    Did you add
    terminal_output gfxterm
    at the end. Although I doubt whether that will change the currently set menu resolution.
    So the question is: Is there any way to change the resolution of grub from its own console? Or is there a way to manipulate the live images before burning them in order to start grub with the desired resolution?
    You may want to checkout grub-emu (available in grub-bzr aur pkg, not in core/grub). It emulates a grub menu from which you can test all graphics related stuff. I haven't tried it myself though.

  • When I am open file with adobe Pro and reader the resolution in my computer failing, change the resolution from 1920x1200 to 800x600. my video card is nvidia quadro 2000. w7 & 32 bits

    when I am open file with adobe Pro and reader the resolution in my computer failing, change the resolution from 1920x1200 to 800x600. my video card is nvidia quadro 2000. w7 & 32 bits

    Hi fabiangs,
    I'm not sure that I follow. Are you saying that when you open a PDF file in Acrobat or Reader, that the display resolution changes automatically on your system?
    What version of Acrobat/Reader are you using? Do you see this same issue in other files/applications?
    I look forward to hearing back from you.
    Best,
    Sara

Maybe you are looking for