Browser compatability: Netscape 6 displays code

Tuesday, March 05, 2002 8:50 AM (NEW!)
I am now doing browser compatability testing with Netscape 6; I developed a site using IE 6: After logging in using the login page, the homepage simply displays one line of code:
<%@page contentType="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" language="java" import="java.sql.*"%> <% rsJournal.close(); ConnrsJournal.close(); %>
Why is my programming code displaying in the Netscape browser? What is the solution to this? Does the solution present any repercussions with other browsers?
-Michael

Do you have anything in your server code that does different things based on the browser making the request? If so, that's where I would start looking.

Similar Messages

  • Browser Compatability Help please?

    Hi.  Im somewhat new to Dreamwevaer, I actually still use GoLive, but slowly trying to move over to DW.
    Im doing Browser Compatability tests for a website, and not sure how to fix these errors DW is giving me.
    Id appreciate any help or thoughts?
    thank you in advance!
    -Unsupported value: 'inline-block'  Affects: Netscape 8.0
    -Unsupported value: 'inline-block'  Affects: Internet Explorer 6.0, 7.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2; Opera 8.0, 9.0; Safari 2.0, 3.0
    -Error parsing styles Affects: Firefox 3.0
    -Unsupported property: zoom  Affects: Firefox 3.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2; Netscape 8.0; Opera 8.0, 9.0; Safari 2.0, 3.0
    -Unsupported property: content  Affects: Internet Explorer 6.0, 7.0, 8.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2

    You do have some HTML errors. If you run it through this validator, it will show you where they are and you can repair them...
    http://validator.w3.org/
    There is an error in the css of your <head> section, you have a line of css outside your <style> tags...
    #example-one li,#example-one li a { display: inline-block; float: none; *display:inline;/* ie6 and 7 inlin e-box hack */ zoom: 1.0; }
    If you don't need it, delete it, if you do, just move it into one of the <style> tag sets. (you may want to clean the css up and move it to an external sheet so everything is in the same place)
    The rest of it looks fine according to the CSS validator here: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ the errors it throws, aside from the out of place css line are to be expected and don't affect anything negatively (they're just browser specific code).
    I wouldn't be surprised if that line is causing the error you're seeing.

  • CSS error, style sheet link, affects browser compatibility..

    Left comfort of GoLive and tables, to CS5 Suite - Dreamweaver. Basic CSS skills, so don't have the intuitive ability to frame question well.
    Regarding this particular page, I simply built, then copied the index.html page on a test site at:
    http://www.screamingeagles.com/client_view/ScreamingEagles_v2/index.html
    and stripped out sidebars and menu bar, and began building a form in the "main content" area.
    URL to page in question:
    http://www.screamingeagles.com/client_view/ScreamingEagles_v2/contact/contact.html
    Noticed a "green line" in code so checked browser compatibility as follows:
    -------Browser Compatibility-------------------
    Found 2 errors in twoColFixLtHdr.css
    Affects: Firefox 1.5; Internet Explorer 6.0, 7.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2; Netscape 8.0; Opera 8.0, 9.0; Safari 2.0
    -----------------Error found (green lined in code) as follows------------------------
    Line 6: <link href="../css/twoColFixLtHdr.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
    Validation didn't give me anything to go on. Given my modest coding skills, should I just build a new page from templates as an better
    alternative to bothering forum participants?
    Thanks in advance,
    J. Satterwhite
    SatGraphics.com
    Mac Pro
    Adobe Creative Design Suite

     Noticed a "green line" in code so checked browser compatibility as follows: 
    -------Browser Compatibility-------------------
    Found 2 errors in twoColFixLtHdr.css
    Affects: Firefox 1.5; Internet Explorer 6.0, 7.0; Internet Explorer for Macintosh 5.2; Netscape 8.0; Opera 8.0, 9.0; Safari 2.0
    -----------------Error found (green lined in code) as follows------------------------
    Line 6: <link href="../css/twoColFixLtHdr.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
    Validation didn't give me anything to go on.
    I think that the errors are *in* the twoColFixLtHdr.css file, so you need to open that file and run Validation again.
    HTH,
    Randy

  • Browser compatibility issue with IE6/7

    Hello,
    I created my webpage in dreamweaver on a MAC.  I have viewed my page(s) A-OK in Safari and firefox however I am being told that my page is not viewing properly on Internet Explorer.  I then found the browser compatibility feature to test the page in Dreamweaver.  What I have found is that I have browser support problems...this is the error from my index page - which is actually on all my pages!
    un-scrollable content bug:
    If one or more absolutely-positioned elements are placed within a relatively positioned element with no assigned dimensions, either no scrollbar will appear at all, or it will not extend far enough to view all of the content. (Note: This bug will not affect your page if the content in the AP element does not extend beyond the height of the viewport.)
    Affects: Internet Explorer 6.0
    Likelihood: Possible
    This bug is on line 56:   <div style="position:relative">
    This issue is on all my pages...please help
    I am just not sure how to solve this problem - I am more of a designer than a coder.  Any help whatsoever to point me in the right direction is most graciously appreciated!!!
    My webpage URL is: lifeforcemd ah yes that is a .com extension - lifeforcemd.com

    Hi kadarusastry,
    This issue is about the browser compatibility.
    Please add your SharePoint site into compatibility view in IE 9 or IE 10.
    Or, use IE 8 mode in browser mode for IE 9 or IE 10.
    About how to add site into compatibility view, you can refer to the link:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2536204
    Note: the settings for IE 9 and IE 10 are same.
    Best Regards,
    Wendy
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Browser Compatibility Issue with IE9 and IE 10

    Hi Everybody,
    I have a page which contains pageviewer Webpart, which redirects to the other page the problem is in IE 8 this works good but comes to IE9 and IE 10 the page is not displaying on the page but link is working good. Can any one please give me suggestions on
    this?
    Thanks and Regards,
    kadaruSastry

    Hi kadarusastry,
    This issue is about the browser compatibility.
    Please add your SharePoint site into compatibility view in IE 9 or IE 10.
    Or, use IE 8 mode in browser mode for IE 9 or IE 10.
    About how to add site into compatibility view, you can refer to the link:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2536204
    Note: the settings for IE 9 and IE 10 are same.
    Best Regards,
    Wendy
    Wendy Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Dreamweaver browser compatibility

    I wrote a simple little BMI calculator that was putting the result in a span. Because I wanted to clear all fields, I modified the javascript to put the calculated result into a form input field. Now, the calculator works in some browsers and not others. It works in Chrome and Safari but not IE and Firefox. I verified the code with W3C and used the browser compatibility function in Dreamweaver to check my code. Everything is supposedly fine. HELP! Has anyone else had this problem?

    The link is
    http://mywebtest.heliohost.org/bmicalculator2.html
    Thanks.

  • Browser Compatibility Error in DW CS5 assets link Please help New to Dreamweaver

    Please can anyone help? Using DW CS5  -.Using Spry Menu Bar 2.0 - have it all formatted - ran Browser Compatibility -Shows my Spry link reference has error. Here is the code
    <script src="SpryAssets/SpryMenuBar.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
           <link href="SpryAssets/SpryMenuBarHorizontal.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">
           <style type="text/css">
           body {
    Error is underlined at:  <link href="SpryAssets/SpryMenuBarHorizontal.css"
    It is located in the page head just below the banner
    I am new to dreamweaver..I do not know how to fix this code..
    Running Win XP. Thank you in advance for any help you can provide.

    In case you need it the link to this page is:
    http://www.bountifulspinweave.com/aboutus.htm
    It is  spry menubar 2.0

  • DIV Issue - browser compatibility

    Hi all,
    This is my first post here.  I'm using Dreamweaver CS3 and CS4.  This is the site that I'm having troubles with:  http://smg.ryansheeler.com
    Its fine with Firefox - but in IE 7 and 8 both the DIVs with the list in them are skewed to the right and the text gets cut off.   I know its a browser compatibility/code problem but I can't find where.     Please help    Below is the CSS file its attached too:
    -ryan
    body
    {margin-bottom:0px;
    margin-left:0px;
    margin-right:0px;
    margin-top:0px;
    background-color:#B02025;
    text-align:left;
    font-family:arial;
    font-size:14px;
    .links
    {font-family:tahoma;
    width:145px;
    font-size:11px;
    text-align:center;
    text-transform:uppercase;
    font-weight:bold;
    text-decoration:none;
    .links a
    {color:#ffffff;
    text-decoration:none;}
    .links:ahover
    {color:#B02025;
    text-decoration:none;}
    .sap
    {font-family:tahoma;
    width:1px;
    font-size:11px;
    text-align:center;
    font-weight:bold;
    color:#ffffff;
    .heading
    {font-family:arial;
    font-size:12px;
    color:#000000;
    font-weight:bold;
    height:32px;
    padding-left:10px;
    .border
    {border-left:12px solid #000000;
    border-right:12px solid #000000;}
    .name
    {font-family:"trebuchet ms";
    font-size:40px;
    color:#ffffff;
    padding-left:10px;}
    .tag
    {color:#ffffff;
    padding-left:12px;}
    #main
    {padding-left:10px;
    padding-bottom:10px;
    padding-right:10px;}
    a{color:#B02025;
    text-decoration:underline;
    font-weight:bold;}
    a:hover{color:#B02025;
    text-decoration:none;}
    .copy{color:#000000;
    text-decoration:underline;
    font-weight:bold;}
    .copy:hover{color:#000000;
    text-decoration:none;}
    .quicklinks{
    padding-left:15px;
    font-size:11px;
    font-family:tahoma;
    height:35px;
    clear:left;
    border-bottom:1px solid #ffffff;}
    .quicklinks a{
    color:#B02025;
    text-decoration:none;}
    .quicklinks a:hover{
    color:#000000;
    text-decoration:none;}

    Hi and Welcome to the DW Forum
    Start by fixing the reported code errors shown below.  90% of browser rendering problems are caused by malformed code.
    http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fsmg.ryansheeler.com%2F
    http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?profile=css21&warning=0&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fsmg. ryansheeler.com%2F
    Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    Web | Graphics | Print | Media  Specialists
    http://alt-web.com/
    http://twitter.com/altweb
    http://alt-web.blogspot.com

  • Newbie needs help with browser compatibility

    Ok, so I'm new at this, so this may be something really
    simple, but browser compatibility? I made a site in DW;html and it
    shows up perfect in safari but internet explorer and firefox not so
    much. I did a browser compatibility test in DW and it says nothing
    is wrong with my pages, but obviously something must be!!
    On my home page, the image of a house that I have next to the
    company name shows up fine in safari but not any other browsers.
    And my page layout, everything is moved over funny in other
    browsers. Also there are link boxes around the table I created with
    different brands of products. On safari the boxes do not show, but
    all the other browsers it does!! I'm new at this and frustrated!!!
    Need help!!
    The link is holmeshifi.com and I posted code from the home
    page!

    OK thanks Ned sorry to soo dumb I'm on a learning curve here!  what 
    I'm trying to do is go to the URLs of web galleries of images from my 
    main site
    so I would presumably have to rename them on my server? i.e. does that 
    mean adding the code ", "_blank");
    to the files on the server?
    At the moment I have to use the back button on my browser window which
    takes me back to the main site which then has to reload (tediously!)

  • Browser Compatability Hell.

    Hi There
    Does anyone out there know how to solve browser compatibility issues in sites built in Dreamweaver. My site works perfectly in all browsers except IE 8, in which case the table looks like its exploding when the site loads. I have tried running that line of code fixer and I cannot get it to work. This is driving me absolutely insane. Does anyone out there know anything about this?

    Please don't email anything. I cannot guarantee a personal response.
    Posting a link here is quite common and nothing to be embarrassed about (assuming you're only referring to the browser compatibility issue, that is).

  • Browser compatability check

    I'm trying to use the new browser compatability check feature
    in CS3. It seems useless. It tells me there is an error, but
    doesn't tell me WHAT the error is or how to fix it. It just points
    me to their website, but there is no reference code of any sort to
    reference the error. Are there any tricks to this feature to make
    it work better?

    See these articles for some suggestions:
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firefox+has+just+updated+tab+shows+each+time+you+start+Firefox
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/How+to+set+the+home+page - Firefox supports multiple home pages separated by '|' symbols
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Preferences_not_saved
    Which security software (firewall, anti-virus) do you have?

  • JSF Cross Browser Compatibility

    In reading about JSF I find no promise for cross browser compatibility. Am I to assume that this has been missed because
    i. JSF is a specification and not an implementation and I should be looking for the implementation to make that promise.
    ii. it's basically to hard to promise this.
    iii. I didn't look hard enough.
    I am guessing it's a (i) with the likely hood of (ii) to follow. But I would be interested on any feed back that anyone cares to add. For example, a implementation that is trying to promise this.

    In my opinion, the JSF specification (or better, any specification) can only refer to other specifications, but never to a concrete software product. Consider a sentence like:
            JSF 1.0 is compatible with IEWhat could that mean? Some possibilities:
    (1)     As it happened, until now, we did not stumble over a
            faces application that broke when run on our Faces
            reference implementation (version 1_1_01) in a
            WSAD 5.0 container in combination with IE 5.5
            with patch 12345 on Windows NT4 SP6 patch 98765.
            (To breake means to produce a result not legitimized
            by the spec, or to produce no result when one is
            expected, at least not in a reasonable time.
            Breakdowns caused by power failure or other
            reasons outside the scope of the spec to be ignored)Well, not worth any further comment.
    (2)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in a
            WSAD 5.0 container in combination with IE 5.5
            with patch 12345 on Windows NT4 SP6 patch 98765
            (To breake means ...)That is ok... if you have just this combination of components and will never change. Keep in mind that (2) does not promise
    anything if you use IE5.5 patch 12345a (and the saying is, there have been several patches to IE ;-)
    (3)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in any container
            in combination with IE 5.5
            with patch 12345 on Windows NT4 SP6 patch 98765.
            (To breake means ...)Same as (2)
    (4)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in any container
            in combination with IE 6.0 on any platform with
            any patches.
            (To breake means ...)Maybe what is intended, just impossible to promise. First, such a bold statement about some software can not be proven.
    Second, even if you have gained good confidence by thorow testing, who knows which future changes Microsoft will apply to IE 6.0 (via patches, which offen not only correct bugs, but also introduce new and maybe incompatible features)
    (5)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in any JSP 1.2
            or higher container in combination any broser
            which supports:
               - HTML 4.0.1
               - JavaScript 1.3
               - CSS 1.0
            where IE 6.0 is a browser which supports these
            three standards on any platform with any patches.
            (To breake means ...)It's getting better. But why, for heavens sake, should a JSF specification make a statement about the compliance of IE with HTML 4.0.1, JavaScript 1.3 and CSS 1.0? I think it would be the job of Microsoft to declare the compatibilty of their products with standards (if any applies, whatsoever).
    Therefore, lets get rid of these and we have:
    (6)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 Spec will not brake
            on any faces application when run in any JSP 1.2
            or higher container in combination any broser
            which supports:
               - HTML 4.0.1
               - JavaScript 1.3
               - CSS 1.0
            (To breake means ...)Nearly finished, just a little bit wordy. It is (nearly) obvious what 'to breake' means. And that it is common wisdom that software breakes, not some specification (Or, as Bertrand Meyer put it, Bubbles don crash. Specifications may be contradictory or fail to describe an algorithm, but never crash). Common wisdom removed gives:
    (7)     Implementations of JSF 1.0 need a JSP 1.2 container
            and a browser capable of HTML 4.0.1, JavaScript 1.3
            and CSS 1.0That's it. Specs exist for two reasons. First, to be discussed and thought about. Second, to be implemented. (To the supporters of agile methods: of course you can reverse the sequence ;-). Therefore, specs should be as short and concise as possible, omitting any useless blabla. If the specs are sufficently precise and of moderate complexity, we can even try to prove the compatibility of the specifications. 'COMPATIBLE WITH IE' is advertisement, not tech talk.
    Conclusion: Mixing up specifications and implementaions is generally a bad thing. Exception: All sentences where a specification and a implementation are mentioned together should have the form:
             Implementation X does [not] conform to specification Y
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I have a follow up question, just inspired by yours. It does not especially concern JSF, but web pages in general.
    Some time ago, I stumbled over quite a few web sites with big red eye catchers:
    OPTIMIZED FOR INTERNET EXPLORER!!!
    And really, they did not look good on Netscape Navigator. Now, my question is, what do you think when you hit such a page? My first thoughts (it's long ago) have been:
        - Oh, nice designers. They really care for the majority of people,
          my neighbor uses an IE.
        - They just skiped the work for other browsers and sell this as an
          optimization. And I didn't get it. Very clever.
        - Poor Guys. Probably they had no other browser at hand.
        - Obviously they had publish this tremendously important information
          under pressure, no time to also optimize for others browsers.Wolfgang Oellinger

  • Browser compatibility checker

    I wrote earlier about problems I am having with the correct
    presentation of my home page with Safari 3.X and Firefox vs. IE7.
    With Dreamweaver CS3 the browser compatibility checker works
    with (as one browser example) Safari 1.X and 2.X.
    Is there a way to update the checker to deal with the newer
    versions of any and all browsers so that the checks can be of more
    current use? I already know my site is fine with Safari 2.X, but
    the outmoded check can't give me any clues as to what is wrong when
    viewed with 3.X, etc.
    Thanks.

    If you have page rending problems run your site through the
    W3 validators.
    Valid code takes care of most, if not all, rendering problems
    in Safari, FF,
    Opera and IE7.
    http://validator.w3.org/check
    http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
    Sorry, I don't know if you can update the browser
    compatibility checker
    list. I never use it. I run my sites through live browser
    checks.
    --Nancy O.
    Alt-Web Design & Publishing
    www.alt-web.com
    "MDG123456" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:gbdhuk$msp$[email protected]..
    > I wrote earlier about problems I am having with the
    correct presentation
    of my
    > home page with Safari 3.X and Firefox vs. IE7.
    >
    > With Dreamweaver CS3 the browser compatibility checker
    works with (as one
    > browser example) Safari 1.X and 2.X.
    >
    > Is there a way to update the checker to deal with the
    newer versions of
    any
    > and all browsers so that the checks can be of more
    current use? I already
    know
    > my site is fine with Safari 2.X, but the outmoded check
    can't give me any
    clues
    > as to what is wrong when viewed with 3.X, etc.
    >
    > Thanks.
    >

  • Why are most websites only displaying code like text?

    Almost all of the web sites that I frequent have began displaying code like text on a blank white background. Some sites still have hyperlinks and images here and there with random text, but others are fully blank with what appears to be the code of the website showing. I wasn't able to access this web site until I tried multiple times and it magically worked, but others are still not working. The only sites that I have tested that have worked from the start are Google related sites (Gmail, Google, Youtube). My yahoo email is inaccessible, which is an important email for me and all other sites that i frequent are inaccessible. One major thing to note is that the sites are also inaccessible on Internet Explorer. This would typically lead you to believe that the problem lies with your connection in some way. I have reset my router/modem and it had no effect. I also have ran CCleaner and have deleted temp files, cookies, and caches. I have tried running Mozilla in safe mode with add-ons disabled as well. My malware protection and antivirus protection find no issues after completing full scans. One last thing to note is that, on both Firefox and IE, certain sites allow to me to access the homepage, such as yahoo, but once I attempt to check my mail the random display of code appears. On IE it simply says that the site cannot be displayed once I click to check my mail. Gmail works perfect on the other hand. The only things that I have done during this time are:
    Setup a LogMeIn account (Hamachi) and connected my PC to their service
    Downloaded and began using Malewarebytes software to remove malware that I had picked up
    Other than those two things it has been the same usual actions on my PC. Could the malware that I had still be effecting me somehow even though it was found/deleted? Is my router to blame even though resetting it does not help? After all the things I have tried, what could it be?

    What is the content type of those pages if you check that via Tools > Page Info > General?
    Is that text/html as it should be or text/plain as your screenshot would suggest?
    You can also check the Net log via the Web Console (Web Developer > Web Console;Ctrl+Shift+K)
    *https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Tools/Web_Console
    *https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Using_the_Web_Console
    This can be a problem with your firewall that modifies the server response headers if the settings in Firefox are correct.
    *http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Basic+Troubleshooting
    A possible cause is security software (firewall,anti-virus) that blocks or restricts Firefox or the plugin-container process without informing you, possibly after detecting changes (update) to the Firefox program.
    Remove all rules for Firefox and the plugin-container from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
    See:
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Server+not+found
    *https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firewalls
    Try to boot the computer in Windows Safe mode with network support (press F8 on the boot screen) as a test to see if that works.

  • Spry accordion browser compatability issues

    I am building my first site and was in the process of checking each page for browser compatability. this certain page has spry accordians and I have some error messages that I don't understand.
    The first one says Line 48 has 2 errors in SpryAccordian.css.  I don't have any indication of what the problem is and where exactly line 48 is on the page. Is there a way for it to take you to that exact spot to show you where the problem is?
    I clicked on get more info. and came to a page that doesn't seem to be addressing what my issue is. Don't understand that part.
    How do I fix this and why did it happen?

    Type cmd / ctrl + , for the go to line number window in DW.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do you get support from Adobe?

    I cannot get any support or answers from Adobe. Chat: they said they couldn't answer my question, I had to call the support phone number. I did this. They asked for my phone number and said they would call back in 30 to 40 minutes. They called back i

  • Few questions about Lenovo G550

    Hello, I plan to buy an inexpensive laptop, propably it will be a Lenovo G550L but I got few questions about this model. Here are my questions: 1. What 320GB hard disks are mounted inside G550L, Western Digital, Seagate or Hitachi (exact model if pos

  • PHP Form Mail Scripts

    What is a good resource for pre-made PHP Form Mailer Scripts. This is for use with a website hosted on GoDaddy. My client has a few requirements that the GoDaddy script does not offer (and the script I chose from GoDaddy is uneditable). I know nothin

  • CS3 stopped working. Having trouble installing again.

    A few years ago I purchased CS3 for use on my personal laptop. A couple months ago I received an error when opening Photoshop that told me to contact my administrator or Adobe. The programs never worked again. I ultimately uninstalled the creative su

  • Pet store 2.0 + Netbeans + Glassfish + ubuntu 7.04  install problem solved

    Three days ago I tried to install the javapetstore-2.0-ea5 using the following combination: Netbeans 5.5.1 Glassfish v1 ubuntu 7.04. I am new to java and java EE so I could n' t easily figure out the solutions to the problems that I have faced. Gener