Brush preview size does not match brush stroke

The brush preview size does not match brush stroke. I've insert a pic of the problem. I tried allmost everythning, but nothing works.
Does anyone have a solution for this problem?
*I use a wacom tablet.

Is your system cursor size set to something other than normal?
under Apple, System Preferences, Universal Access.

Similar Messages

Annoying 'Could not use the history eraser because the current canvas size does not match that of the history state' message

Does anyone know if it is possible to get rid of the message 'Could not use the history eraser because the current canvas size does not match that of the history state'?. It comes up if I hit the alt/option key while I have the eraser selected. Something I do by accident all the time.

The way you've described it, one gets the distinct impression you do not have a clue as to what the history brush does and how to use it.
You need to read up on it. Read the Help files and google for tutorials.
First you need to create an image (with actual pixels in it), edit it as desired, then make a snapshot of the edited image, then target the snapshot with the history brush tool, then go back in the History panel to the step before your edits and selectively paint your edits in with the History Brush.

Cannot submit widget to Apple Downloads : File size does not match

Hello all,
I made a widget to play Go that I finalized yesterday ( http://lesiteajulien.free.fr ).
Unfortunately, I have not succeeded to uploading it to the Apple widget repository, since the submit page keeps returning the following error :
"The filesize from the file you uploaded and the file that is downloaded from the given download URL do NOT match."
But I am absolutely sure that both zip files are the SAME. I downloaded it from my server a few times and compared the size with the original file I'm sending to Apple: they match. So I guess my server is not the cause.
I tryied from various places and with various browsers.
Did anybody have any similar problem while trying to upload a widget ?
Any idea ?
Thanks for your help.
Julien

tntemerson wrote:
The sales people at the Apple store told me that Time Machine makes a true restorable system picture of the native HDD during backups.
So I'm surprised when the backup runs through to a reported completion but the final backup size does not match the stated estimate for a "full backup" which is the same as the Macintosh HD used space.
Time Machine automatically excludes some things that aren't needed for a full system restore: system work files, most logs & caches, trash, some indexes, etc. So it should be a few GBs less than what's on your system, but of course varies a lot from one Mac to another.
See the tan box in #11 of Time Machine - Frequently Asked Questions for the gory details.

Final print size does not match screen view.

Hi
I am having problems getting my final prints to match the screen view. Most recently I have had this problem: I have an image that is sized to 5X7. I have it on a 5X7 template in the print module of Lightroom. The image dimensions in Lightroom say 5X7. I print on 5X7 paper (I actually measured it to be sure). ON the screen they look perfect, match the the templates and measure out fime with the onscreen rulers. Without fail a portion of the print is cut off on the final print. The long side of the print is the most effected. This is not just limited to 5X7's, it happens across the board. Is this a common problem or I am I doing something wrong? In the 5X7 example above the print comes out 5.2 X 7.3 give or take. I am using Lightroom 5.3 on an iMac running OS 10.9.1. The printer is a Canon Pro 100.
I welcome any help with this.
Thank you
Joe

If the problem is that the printed image is being scaled larger, this is a very common side effect with borderless mode settings in print drivers. Typically, (though sometimes you can prevent this where alternative borderless options are given) - an extra unrequested scaling % ensures that any physical mis-registration or inaccuracy of the paper size, does not leave any accidental white edges.
That's nothing to do with LR's end of the process, if so.

Data type size does not match values returned

I've tried searching but couldn't find what I was looking for, sorry if this has been answered or is a duplicate.
I am using the (Java) method below to get the column definitions of a table. I am doing this through an ODBC connection (using Oracle ODBC driver) and I have NO CHOICE in the matter.
The problem I am having is that one particular column has a column size is smaller than the size of the data it purportedly holds (ie attendance_code = varchar size 3 but data value is "Absent". I suspect the data is actually a look up to situation, where my attendance_code column has a value of 'ABS' and Oracle goes and fetchs the "Absent" value.
My issue is that the meta data returned from ODBC is the actual column definition (ie varchar(3) and not varchar2(10) for example).
How do I resolve this? I do not have access to all_columns table etc. I have to do it using ODBC metadata only.
TIA.
public ArrayList<SchemaColumn> getColumnsForTable(String catalog,
               String schema,
               String tableName) {
          ArrayList<SchemaColumn> columns = new ArrayList<SchemaColumn>();
          ResultSet rs = null;
          try {
               DatabaseMetaData metaData = connection.getMetaData();
               rs = metaData.getColumns(catalog, schema, tableName, "%");
               SchemaColumn column;
               while (rs.next()) {
                    column = new SchemaColumn();
                    column.setName(rs.getString("COLUMN_NAME"));
                    column.setDataType(rs.getInt("DATA_TYPE"));
                    column.setTypeName(rs.getString("TYPE_NAME"));
                    column.setColumnSize(rs.getInt("COLUMN_SIZE")); <-------- this is the value that is coming back smaller than the data it actually returns
                    column.setDecimalDigits(rs.getInt("DECIMAL_DIGITS"));
                    column.setNumPrecisionRadix(rs.getInt("NUM_PREC_RADIX"));
                    column.setNullable(rs.getInt("NULLABLE"));
                    column.setRemarks(rs.getString("REMARKS"));
                    column.setDefaultValue(rs.getString("COLUMN_DEF"));
                    column.setSqlDataType(rs.getInt("SQL_DATA_TYPE"));
                    column.setSqlDateTimeSub(rs.getInt("SQL_DATETIME_SUB"));
                    column.setCharOctetLength(rs.getInt("CHAR_OCTET_LENGTH"));
                    column.setOrdinalPosition(rs.getInt("ORDINAL_POSITION"));
                    columns.add(column);
          } catch (Exception e) {
               Log.getLogger().error("Could not capture table schema");
          closeResultSet(rs);
          return columns;
Edited by: user10382699 on Apr 11, 2011 4:15 PM

John, thanks for your reply.
As far as I know I'm not doing anything inaccurately/incorrectly.
The select I am using is SELECT * FROM <tableName>.
The resultset metadata has a size of 3 for the column in question, and querying the schema also yields 3 for that column.
I've tried recreating the situation using the Oracle XE DB, but as I am not familiar with Oracle, I do not know how to recreate this scenario (which would then lead me to test other options with ODBC).

Data type column size does not match size of values returned

I've tried searching but couldn't find what I was looking for, sorry if this has been answered or is a duplicate.
I am using the (Java) method below to get the column definitions of a table. I am doing this through an ODBC connection (using Oracle ODBC driver) and I have NO CHOICE in the matter.
The problem I am having is that one particular column has a column size is smaller than the size of the data it purportedly holds (ie attendance_code = varchar size 3 but data value is "Absent". I suspect the data is actually a look up to situation, where my attendance_code column has a value of 'ABS' and Oracle goes and fetchs the "Absent" value.
My issue is that the meta data returned from ODBC is the actual column definition (ie varchar(3) and not varchar2(10) for example).
The resultset metadata has a size of 3 for the column in question, and querying the schema also yields 3 for that column.
How do I resolve this? I do not have access to all_columns table etc. I have to do it using ODBC metadata only.
I've tried recreating the situation using the Oracle XE DB, but as I am not familiar with Oracle, I do not know how to recreate this scenario (which would then lead me to test other options with ODBC).
TIA.
The select I am using is SELECT * FROM <tableName>.
public ArrayList<SchemaColumn> getColumnsForTable(String catalog,
String schema,
String tableName) {
ArrayList<SchemaColumn> columns = new ArrayList<SchemaColumn>();
ResultSet rs = null;
try {
DatabaseMetaData metaData = connection.getMetaData();
rs = metaData.getColumns(catalog, schema, tableName, "%");
SchemaColumn column;
while (rs.next()) {
column = new SchemaColumn();
column.setName(rs.getString("COLUMN_NAME"));
column.setDataType(rs.getInt("DATA_TYPE"));
column.setTypeName(rs.getString("TYPE_NAME"));
column.setColumnSize(rs.getInt("COLUMN_SIZE")); <-------- this is the value that is coming back smaller than the data it actually returns
column.setDecimalDigits(rs.getInt("DECIMAL_DIGITS"));
column.setNumPrecisionRadix(rs.getInt("NUM_PREC_RADIX"));
column.setNullable(rs.getInt("NULLABLE"));
column.setRemarks(rs.getString("REMARKS"));
column.setDefaultValue(rs.getString("COLUMN_DEF"));
column.setSqlDataType(rs.getInt("SQL_DATA_TYPE"));
column.setSqlDateTimeSub(rs.getInt("SQL_DATETIME_SUB"));
column.setCharOctetLength(rs.getInt("CHAR_OCTET_LENGTH"));
column.setOrdinalPosition(rs.getInt("ORDINAL_POSITION"));
columns.add(column);
} catch (Exception e) {
Log.getLogger().error("Could not capture table schema");
closeResultSet(rs);
return columns;
}

I can't say I've ever seen a case where a column held more data than it was declared as, and would have to file that under "see it to believe it" category.
Even if that somehow were the case, I'd expect the ODBC driver to return what the column is defined as anyway, not the data. The data changes with every row, but I'd expect the table metadata to be consistent, and refer to the table definition.
For grins though, can you provide system.out.println output of the metadata, and also a "describe xxxx" from sqlplus if you can, where xxx is the table name?
ie,
while (rs.next()) {
System.out.println("column name is " + rs.getString("COLUMN_NAME"));
System.out.println("data type is " + rs.getInt("DATA_TYPE"));
..etc..
Greg

Preview image does not match content image

I have been using Bridge CS3 on MAC OS X 10.4 for about 2 years and have happily used it as part of my image processing work flow for thousands of images. A Canon 1DS is my main camera. Some time ago I have started using a Canon G9 in addition to the 1DS. So far so good.
Recently and for no reason I can see, Bridge has started displaying an entirely different image in the preview panel than the image selected in the content panel. This only seems to happen when selecting RAW G9 images in the content panel; the image shown in the preview panel will be a processed PSD file originally taken on the 1DS, or a 1DS RAW image (of an entirely different subject and processed months earlier). Needless to say, the file name format of RAW G9 images and processed / RAW 1DS images is entirely different. What ever Bridge is using to marry content image selected with preview image displayed, its getting it wrong. I should add that that this doesn't always happen all of the time - but it does happen about 25% of the time.
When I open in ACR I get the correct image. Also Bridge meta data refers to the correct image. It is just preview that is incorrect.
I have compacted and refreshed the cache. This resolves the issue the first time I go back in and select images from the content panel, but if I reselect, I'm back where I started.
Has anyone ever experienced this?
(in preferences against "When Creating Thumbnails Generate:" I have "Convert To High Quality When Previewed". Also I have both "Use Software Rendering" and "Use High-quality Previews" checked. I'm using Bridge CS3 2.1.1.9)
Many thanks, Tom

I had this with my Canon30D files as well. Spurious previews. I met with Adobe in person and went over this. I then moved to Bridge 3.x and went over why I needed high quality images and the person I was working with took many copies of my images to work on the high quality previews.
I found when I went to one of the 3.x versions of Bridge, this was corrected and I got to use High Quality without the spurious previews.
I did not have to give up my High Quality. At least not in my case.
I will note that I was on the prerelease member site and so did get Bridge 3.x versions that may not have made it to the public, hard to know as I have since moved on to CS4.
I remember a time when I could not use the global purge command and had to throw away all cache folders but this is no longer the case.
I think Adobe did all they could to fix this issue and still feel that it was incredible that they met with me several times and did conference calls with 6-7 engineers in the room with me and how they really seemed to want to know what was up.
So I, for one, cannot say there will remain a black eye. Adobe was very supportive with me.
b One thing though, I could not use "software render" ever with any success.

PDF Page Size does not match Canvas Size

Hello,
I'm using Xcelsius 2008 Engage SP1 on Vista 64bit with Office 2007 installed. When I'm exporting a Xcelsius file to PDF, the resulting Page Size of the PDF file is 8.5in x 11in. However, the Canvas size in Xcelsius is 800x600 (pixels). The resulting PDF file has quite a bit of whitespace in the top and bottom sections of the file.
Is there anyway that I can export to PDF but with a file size that is in the same aspect ratio than the Canvas Size?
Thanks for any input.
Regards,
Jon

We regularly export to PDF and face this issue. I believe that the adjustments need to be made in Acrobat as there is, from my understanding, no way to change the default export in Xcelsius. You are probably already be doing this, but if not ... our solution has been, once you have exported your model into Acrobat, to simply rotate the page before saving the file. At 800 x 600 you may still have some white space at the top and bottom of your model. We typically use an Xcelsius canvas size of 1100 x 850. When exported (and rotated in Acrobat) this gives a nice crisp image that also fills the page. I hope this helps you.

Total iCloud back up size does not match

Hello,
I just noticed that my "next icloud backup size" is only 8.6 gb, however, I have a 120GB iphone 6, 114gb which is being used. How is my icloud backup only 8.5 gb? I have the 200gb icloud storage plan.

My Windows computer has 3 terabyte hard drive. I use only 750 gigs partition. There are about 500 gigs of music, movies and tv shows, but all of them would not be included in icloud backup. Documents and settings would. So if I did computer backup it would take over 500 gigs, but if I did icloud backup of the phone with the same info, media (movies, songs apps) would not be included.
Here is what is included.
https://support.apple.com/kb/PH12519

OVI backup .nbu file size does not match actual da...

Hi,
I just backed up my phone through the Ovi Suite. The backup was VERY fast (compared to previous backups doen in earlier versions of Ovi Suite) probably due to the new fixed version of Ovi Suite.
Anyway... The backup file (.nbu) is almost 1.85 GB but when I browse my phone (in My Computer folder) and do 'Select All' the size of the data on my Phone Mass Memory reads 2.44 GB.......
SO.... is the backup data in the .nbu file somehow compressed?? Or maybe incomplete?
Thank you

Not sure but..My 1.7 GB (Phone) is equivalent to 0.6 GB (PC) .. but I have done restore without anything missing out..
The phones OS related files may not be getting Backed-up..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------If you find this helpful, pl. hit the White Star in Green Box...

Home folder size does not match sum of its contents?

My Home folder using the Get Info command displays that it is around 550GB in size. In trying to find where the large files/folders might be so I can remove them, I Get Info on all the nested folders of the Home folder; Desktop, Documents, Downloads, Movies, Pictures, Music, etc. All these folders combined add up to around 25GB, which clearly isn't even close to 550 GB. I dont understand why there is such an enormous difference. What else can I do to find out what is taking up so much space? It's a fairly new iMac in recent months (not a MacBook Pro), and running 10.8.5. I dont have hardly any files on it since its so new.

Hi Beau,
Without taking a look at any logs from your device, I strongly suggest to run a rescue CD.
Download the image called "The Accelerator Binary Image" for whatever WAAS version you currently run.
Burn the cd and follow this steps:
Insert the rescue CD on the box and reload the WAE
You should see the following menu automatically:
-     Installer Main Menu: ( please do 2,3,5,8)
-     >     1. Configure Network
-     >     2. Manufacture flash
-     >     3. Install flash cookie
-     >     4. Install flash image from network
-     >     5. Install flash image from cdrom
-     >     6. Install flash image from disk
-     >     7. Recreate RAID device (WAE-674/7341/7371 only)
-     >     8. Wipe out disks and install .bin image
-     >     9. Exit (Eject and reboot)
Remove the CD from the WAE –reboot it.
here are the steps again: ( this guide is for an old version 4.0 but the steps are the same for any version)
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/app_ntwk_services/waas/waas/v4013/configuration/guide/maint.html#wp1105207
I don't usually ask this but,, please do the steps above twice on your device ( just in case).
best of luck!

Iphone 4 file size does not match the ACTUAL file size

My iphone 4 is reading 27 gigs of music as over 29 gigs of music. I don't understand why. Anyone else having an issue like this? My 3gs reads it as 27 gigs and so does my computer. I even set my 3gs to sync off a backup of my iphone 4 and it reads it as 2 less gigs. Why?

Don't know, though Apple has been known to play with the numbers a bit:
http://www.tuaw.com/2009/08/29/snow-leopard-the-new-one-gigabyte-now-slimmer-tha n-before/
Or you could have had a conversion box checked in iTunes when you loaded your IPh4
Phil

Brush preview size / Size of actual brush stroke do not match?

Hello.
I recently acquired a Macbook Air (2012 version) and it came with CS5 extended preloaded. Everything seems to be working fine, with the exception of these two things:
1. Whenever I select any--that means any--brush and put down a dot or stroke, the width of the stroke is ALWAYS smaller than the preview size for the brush.
With the brush preview size on the left, the dot comes out the size of the dot on the right.
2. The pencil tool has the same exact problem. Also, when I use the pencil tool, the little cross in the middle of the brush preview becomes offset a little bit down and little bit to the right on every even number. (e.g., cross is centered in 3px brush, offset in 4px brush, centered in 5px brush, offset in 6px brush.
I've reset my brush settings multiple times. As far as I can tell, this isn't an issue of any individual brush setting.
As someone who does a lot of pixel art, this has basically brought my work to a full stop. I would greatly appreciate some help.
Cheers.

Which version of mac os x are you using?
Look under System>Preferences>Accessibility>Display and see if the Cursor Size is set to something other than Normal
(you want the Cursor Size set to Normal)

Cropping preview does not match output, constrained sizes.

I have two separate problems with the Crop tool. The first is that the crop preview does not match the what shows up after I exit crop mode.
Screen shot of to the preview: tinyurl.com/o9qxcy
After hitting "done": tinyurl.com/prtsrw
What is really strange is that I can work around this by expanding the crop size to almost the full size (less ~1 pixel off the bottom) and iMovie crops to the width of the original clip. If I expand it to full size of the preview area the crop still slices to the width, but it is then centered.
The second problem is that cropping will not let me expand the crop beyond a certain size. I have no work-around for this.
Screenshot of the max size I can select with the crop tool: tinyurl.com/pjqjno
Both of these happen both the project area and the clips drawer.

Bump.

Mouse cursor size does not accurately reflect brush size

Mouse cursor does not reflect brush size in Photoshop CS5 on an iMac 10.5 OS. If I try to draw two parallel lines with the edges touching by aligning the edge of the cursor circle, there is a gap between the lines, no matter how hard I set the brush.
I am using a Wacom Intuous 4 mouse, but the problem persists with the standard mouse after I remove the Wacom driver, so the Wacom people say this is a photoshop problem.
Cursor size is larger than the effect size whether I am using the paint brush, history brush, clone or healing brush.

Bingo!
The Mac OS setting seems to have been the culprit
Thanks

Brush preview size does not match brush stroke

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for