BSIS read - Performance Issue
Hello Gurus,
I need a help.
The below code is used in a BI-FIGL custom user exit.
BSIS read statement.
ABAP Code:
Get Cost Center Accounting from BSIS table
SELECT bukrs "Company Code
gjahr "Fiscal Year
monat "Fiscal Period
hkont "General Ledger Account
prctr "Profit Center
budat "Posting Date in the Document
gsber "Business Area
zuonr "Assignment Number
belnr "Accounting Document Number
kostl "Cost Center Accounting
FROM bsis
INTO TABLE pt_kostl_acc
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN pt_gl_data
WHERE bukrs EQ pt_gl_data-bukrs
AND gjahr EQ pt_gl_data-gjahr
AND monat EQ pt_gl_data-monat
AND hkont EQ pt_gl_data-hkont
AND prctr EQ pt_gl_data-prctr
AND budat EQ pt_gl_data-budat
AND gsber EQ pt_gl_data-gsber
AND zuonr EQ pt_gl_data-zuonr
AND belnr EQ pt_gl_data-belnr.
The extractor literally stops at the above select statement.
Please advise how to solve it.
I created an index . Actually it wroked fine in Q. When I moved to production it is not working. Did I do anything wrong ?
Let me know. Thanks
Thanks to all.
here is my problem. I had the same issue in QA few weeks back. QA was refreshed with PRD data and almost the no of records are same. Around 13.1 million records. This is a user exit in standard BI extractor. It used to hang at the sequential read from BSIS. I created a secondary index and moved to QA and updated the statistics. it worked fine. I can extract almost 2 quarters of data to BW without any issue. I moved all the transports to production couple of days back and again started the extractor. The same problem it got stuck at the BSIS select. I have the same index in production and also updated the statistics. I don't have the ST05 access and I have asked the basis to give to find oout what index it is using to select from BSIS. I can change the code accorind to the suggestions above. In BI each packet size is 15 K records. So for each packet it will do the select each time. So I don't think 15 K records are too high.I though of asking the basis to look into this issue. Since it is working fine in QA. Do you guys have any suggestion. Again thanks for your help.
Edited by: Senthil Esakkiappan on Nov 5, 2009 7:31 PM
Similar Messages
-
HI,
our BSIS table contains almost 10 millions records, now during check printing process when we are quering BSIS table for getting cost center from the line item.
it is taking almost 30-60 seconds which is slowing the check printing process.
SELECT single * FROM BSAK
WHERE BUKRS = COMP AND GJAHR = YR AND AUGBL = PDOC AND BELNR <> PDOC.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM BSIS WHERE
BELNR = BSAK-BELNR AND BUKRS = COMP AND GJAHR = YR
AND ( HKONT LIKE 'A%' OR BLART = 'RE' ).
kostl = bsis-kostl.
for getting cost center first it picks the FI document number from BSAK using Payment document number. and then getting cost center from bsis.
Is there any alternative way of getting cost center of document skiping BSIS.
Thanks,hi,
if you are firing this query regularly then create intex on bsis table.
performance can improve by creating index only.
regards,
raj -
Performance Issue with BSIS(open accounting items)
Hey All,
I am having serious performance issue with a accrual report which gets all open GL items, and need some tips for optimization.
The main issue is that I am accesing large tables like BSIS, BSEG, BSAS etc without proper indexes and that I am dealing with huge amounts of data.
The select itself take a long time and after that as I have so much data overall execution is slow too.
The select which concerns me the most is:
SELECT zuonr hkont gjahr belnr buzei budat blart wrbtr shkzg xblnr waers bukrs
INTO TABLE i_bsis
FROM bsis
WHERE bukrs = '1000'
AND hkont in r_hkont
AND budat <= p_lcdate
AND augdt = 0
AND augbl = space
AND gsber = c_ZRL1
AND gjahr BETWEEN l_gjahr2 AND l_gjahr
AND ( blart = c_re "Invoice
OR blart = c_we "Goods receipt
OR blart = c_zc "Invoice Cancels
OR blart = c_kp ). "Accounting offset
I have seen other related threads, but was not that helpful.
We already have a secondary index on bukrs hkont and budat, and i have checked in ST05 that it does use it. But inspite that it takes more than 15 hrs to complete(maybe because of huge data).
Any Input is highly appreciated.
ThanksThank you Thomas for your inputs:
You said that R_HKONT contains several ranges of account numbers. If these ranges cover a significant
portion of the overall existing account numbers, then there is no really quick access possible via the
BSIS primary key.
Unfortunately R_HKONT contains all account numbers.
As Rob said, your index on HKONT and BUDAT does not help much, since you are selecting "<=" on
BUDAT. No chance of narrowing down that range?
Will look into this.
What about GSBER? Does the value in c_ZRL1 provide a rather small subset of the overall values? Then
an index on BUKRS and GSBER might be helpful.
ZRL1 does provide a decent selection . But I dont know if one more index is a good idea on overall
system performance.
I assume that the four document types are not very selective, so it probably does not pay off to
investigate selecting on BKPF (there is an index involving BLART) and joining BSIS for the additional
information. You still might want to look into it though.
I did try to investigate this option too. Based on other threads related to BSIS and Robs Suggestion in
those threads I tried this:
SELECT bukrs belnr gjahr blart budat
FROM bkpf INTO TABLE bkpf_l
WHERE bukrs = c_pepsico
AND bstat IN (' ', 'A', 'B', 'D', 'M', 'S', 'V', 'W', 'Z')
AND blart IN ('RE', 'WE', 'ZC', 'KP')
AND gjahr BETWEEN l_gjahr2 AND l_gjahr
AND budat <= p_lcdate.
SELECT zuonr hkont gjahr belnr buzei budat blart wrbtr shkzg xblnr waers bukrs
FROM bsis INTO TABLE i_bsis FOR ALL ENTRIES IN bkpf_l
WHERE bukrs = bkpf_l-bukrs
AND hkont IN r_hkont
AND budat = bkpf_l-budat
AND augdt = 0
AND augbl = space
AND gjahr = bkpf_l-gjahr
AND belnr = bkpf_l-belnr
AND blart = bkpf_l-blart
AND gsber = c_zrl1.
The improves the select on BSIS a lot, but the first select on BKPF kills it. Not sure if this would help
improve performance.
Also I was wondering whether it helps on refreshing the tabe statistics through DB20. The last refresh
was done 7 months back. How frequently should we do this? Will it help? -
Interested by performance issue ? Read this ! If you can explain, you're a master Jedi !
This is the question we will try to answer...
What si the bottle neck (hardware) of Adobe Premiere Pro CS6
I used PPBM5 as a benchmark testing template.
All the data and log as been collected using performance counter
First of all, describe my computer...
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 8 Pro 64-bit
CPU
Intel Xeon E5 2687W @ 3.10GHz
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX 32nm Technology
RAM
Corsair Dominator Platinum 64.0 GB DDR3
Motherboard
EVGA Corporation Classified SR-X
Graphics
PNY Nvidia Quadro 6000
EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 // Yes, I created bench stats for both card
Hard Drives
16.0GB Romex RAMDISK (RAID)
556GB LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed (RAID 0)
I have other RAID installed, but not relevant for the present post...
PSU
Cosair 1000 Watts
After many days of tests, I wanna share my results with community and comment them.
CPU Introduction
I tested my cpu and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit, can I reach this limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 1).
Intro : I tested my E5-XEON 2687W (8 Cores Hyperthread - 16 threads) to know if programs can use the maximum of it. I used Prime 95 to get the result. // I know this seem to be ordinary, but you will understand soon...
The result : Yes, I can get 100% of my CPU with 1 program using 20 threads in parallel. The CPU gives everything it can !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test...
(picture 1)
Disk Introduction
I tested my disk and pushed it at maximum speed to understand where is the limit and I've logged precisely all result in graph (See pictures 2).
Intro : I tested my RAID 0 556GB (LSI MegaRAID 9260-8i SATA3 6GB/s 5 disks with Fastpath Chip Installed) to know if I can reach the maximum % disk usage (0% idle Time)
The result : As you can see in picture 2, yes, I can get the max of my drive at ~ 1.2 Gb/sec read/write steady !
Comment : I put 3 IO (cpu, disk, ram) on the graph of my computer during the test to see the impact of transfering many Go of data during ~10 sec...
(picture 2)
Now, I know my limits ! It's time to enter deeper in the subject !
PPBM5 (H.264) Result
I rendered the sequence (H.264) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%, the turn around 50%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate seem to be a wave (up and down). Probably caused by (Encrypt time.... write.... Encrypt time.... write...) // It's ok, ~5Mb/sec during transfert rate !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 39 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~65 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card seem to be a wave also ! (up and down) ~40% usage of GPU during the process of encoding.
GPU Ram get 1.2Go of RAM (But with GTX 680, no problem and Quadro 6000 with 6 GB RAM, no problem !)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (50%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (60%), RAM is free (62%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result !
(picture 3)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (RAID LSI)
I rendered the sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder on my RAID 0 LSI disk.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk wave and wave again, but far far from the limit !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Buffering time.... write.... Buffering time.... write...) // It's ok, ~375Mb/sec peak during transfert rate ! Easy !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40.5 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~48 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Good, thread is the sign that program try to using many cores !)
GPU Load on card = 0 (This kind of encoding is GPU irrelevant)
GPU Ram get 400Mb of RAM (No usage for encoding)
Comment/Question : CPU is free (65%), disks are free (60%), GPU is free (100%), RAM is free (63%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Is there some time delay in the encoding process ?
(picture 4)
PPBM5 (Disk Test) Result (Direct in RAMDrive)
I rendered the same sequence (Disk Test) using Adobe Media Encoder directly in my RamDrive
Comment/Question : Look at the transfert rate under (picture 5). It's exactly the same speed than with my RAID 0 LSI controller. Impossible ! Look in the same picture the transfert rate I can reach with the ramdrive (> 3.0 Gb/sec steady) and I don't go under 30% of disk usage. CPU is idle (70%), Disk is idle (100%), GPU is idle (100%) and RAM is free (63%). // This kind of results let me REALLY confused. It's smell bug and big problem with hardware and IO usage in CS6 !
(picture 5)
PPBM5 (MPEG-DVD) Result
I rendered the sequence (MPEG-DVD) using Adobe Media Encoder.
The result :
My CPU is not used at 100%
My Disk is totally idle !
All the process usage are idle except process of (Adobe Media Encoder)
The transfert rate wave and wave again (up and down). Probably caused by (Encoding time.... write.... Encoding time.... write...) // It's ok, ~2Mb/sec during transfert rate ! Real Joke !
CPU Power management give 100% of clock to CPU during the encoding process (it's ok, the clock is stable during process).
RAM, more than enough ! 40 Go RAM free after the test ! // Excellent
~80 thread opened by Adobe Media Encoder (Lot of thread, but it's ok in multi-thread apps!)
GPU Load on card = 100 (This use the maximum of my GPU)
GPU Ram get 1Gb of RAM
Comment/Question : CPU is free (70%), disks are free (98%), GPU is loaded (MAX), RAM is free (63%), my computer is pushed at limit during the encoding process for GPU only. Now, for this kind of encoding, the speed limit is affected by the slower IO (Video Card GPU)
Other : Quadro 6000 is slower than GTX 680 for this kind of encoding (~20 s slower than GTX).
(picture 6)
Encoding single clip FULL HD AVCHD to H.264 Result (Premiere Pro CS6)
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment/Question : CPU is free (55%), disks are free (99%), GPU is free (90%), RAM is free (65%), my computer is not pushed at limit during the encoding process. Why ???? Adobe Premiere seem to have some bug with thread management. My hardware is idle ! I understand AVCHD can be very difficult to decode, but where is the waste ? My computer want, but the software not !
(picture 7)
Render composition using 3D Raytracer in After Effects CS6
You can look the result in the picture.
Comment : GPU seems to be the bottle neck when using After Effects. CPU is free (99%), Disks are free (98%), Memory is free (60%) and it depend of the setting and type of project.
Other : Quadro 6000 & GTX 680 gives the same result in time for rendering the composition.
(picture 8)
Conclusion
There is nothing you can do (I thing) with CS6 to get better performance actually. GTX 680 is the best (Consumer grade card) and the Quadro 6000 is the best (Profressional card). Both of card give really similar result (I will probably return my GTX 680 since I not really get any better performance). I not used Tesla card with my Quadro, but actually, both, Premiere Pro & After Effects doesn't use multi GPU. I tried to used both card together (GTX & Quadro), but After Effects gives priority to the slower card (In this case, the GTX 680)
Premiere Pro, I'm speechless ! Premiere Pro is not able to get max performance of my computer. Not just 10% or 20%, but average 60%. I'm a programmor, multi-threadling apps are difficult to manage and I can understand Adobe's programmor. But actually, if anybody have comment about this post, tricks or any kind of solution, you can comment this post. It's seem to be a bug...
Thank you.Patrick,
I can't explain everything, but let me give you some background as I understand it.
The first issue is that CS6 has a far less efficient internal buffering or caching system than CS5/5.5. That is why the MPEG encoding in CS6 is roughly 2-3 times slower than the same test with CS5. There is some 'under-the-hood' processing going on that causes this significant performance loss.
The second issue is that AME does not handle regular memory and inter-process memory very well. I have described this here: Latest News
As to your test results, there are some other noteworthy things to mention. 3D Ray tracing in AE is not very good in using all CUDA cores. In fact it is lousy, it only uses very few cores and the threading is pretty bad and does not use the video card's capabilities effectively. Whether that is a driver issue with nVidia or an Adobe issue, I don't know, but whichever way you turn it, the end result is disappointing.
The overhead AME carries in our tests is something we are looking into and the next test will only use direct export and no longer the AME queue, to avoid some of the problems you saw. That entails other problems for us, since we lose the capability to check encoding logs, but a solution is in the works.
You see very low GPU usage during the H.264 test, since there are only very few accelerated parts in the timeline, in contrast to the MPEG2-DVD test, where there is rescaling going on and that is CUDA accelerated. The disk I/O test suffers from the problems mentioned above and is the reason that my own Disk I/O results are only 33 seconds with the current test, but when I extend the duration of that timeline to 3 hours, the direct export method gives me 22 seconds, although the amount of data to be written, 37,092 MB has increased threefold. An effective write speed of 1,686 MB/s.
There are a number of performance issues with CS6 that Adobe is aware of, but whether they can be solved and in what time, I haven't the faintest idea.
Just my $ 0.02 -
Performance Issues with Acrobat Reader 11.0.0.2 when secure mode is enabled
Hello All,
We are experiencing sporadic issues with Acrobat 11.0.0.2 across our domain, users are reporting performance issues when opening PDF documents whether locally or from a network share.
We have found that turning off Secure Mode helps towards reducing this delay and in the cases it doesn't we are repairing the installation and/or reinstalling the application.
Due to the security implications we need to leave this turned on, I am wondering if anyone has encountered this issue and what steps were taken towards resolving it?
I also wonder whether the white list function in the new release 11.0.0.3 would be a solution to this issue?
Kind Regards,
Ryan McCartyNo probelm, so....
We had no problems with Adobe Reader 9 and 10, we encountered the issues when upgrading to 11.0.0.2.
Initially we found that turning off the Protected Mode, helped but did not resolve the issue.
We tried;
1. Turn off protected mode - issue still present
2. Clearing the recent file registry using the below registry path and deleting the keys underneath it.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Adobe\Acrobat Reader\11.0\AVGeneral\cRecentFiles (this does not turn recent files off permanently). - works but needs clearing regularly
3. Turning off welcome screen by creating - HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Policies\Adobe\Acrobat Reader\11.0\FeatureLockDown\cWelcomeScreen - works to improve app open speed.
4. uninstall/reinstall of 11.0.0.2 - works most likley due to the recent files being cleared.
5. upgrade to 11.0.0.3 - issue still present
Following reboots the issue is still present.
When Adobe Reader is the only application open this issue is still present.
As mentioned I have no systems available which I could test this issue using 11.0.0.1 as we have fixed them, albeit temporarily using the reinstall method.
I am concious that this issue is going to reoccur once that cache (recent files) builds back up because the fix above (#2) is clearing the recent files cache NOT disabling it. -
Performance issue showing read by other session Event
Hi All,
we are having a severe performance issue in my database when we are running batch jobs.
This was a new database(11.2.0.2) and we are testing the performance by running some batch jobs. These batch jobs included some inserts and updates.
I am seeing read by other session in top 5 timed events and cache buffers chains in Latch Miss Sources section.
Please help me to solve this out.
Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC
1 27-Feb-12 09:03 11.2.0.2.0 NO
Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
Linux x86 64-bit 8 8 8 48.00
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 5605 29-Feb-12 03:00:27 63 4.5
End Snap: 5614 29-Feb-12 12:00:47 63 4.3
Elapsed: 540.32 (mins)
DB Time: 1,774.23 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,952M 1,952M Std Block Size: 16K
Shared Pool Size: 1,024M 1,024M Log Buffer: 18,868K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 3.3 0.8 0.02 0.05
DB CPU(s): 1.1 0.3 0.01 0.02
Redo size: 55,763.8 13,849.3
Logical reads: 23,906.6 5,937.4
Block changes: 325.7 80.9
Physical reads: 665.6 165.3
Physical writes: 40.4 10.0
User calls: 60.7 15.1
Parses: 10.6 2.6
Hard parses: 1.1 0.3
W/A MB processed: 0.6 0.2
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 151.2 37.6
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 4.0
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.94 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 97.90 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 98.06 Soft Parse %: 90.16
Execute to Parse %: 92.96 Latch Hit %: 100.00
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 76.71 % Non-Parse CPU: 98.57
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 89.38 87.96
% SQL with executions>1: 97.14 95.15
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 96.05 92.46
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
db file sequential read 14,092,706 65,613 5 61.6 User I/O
DB CPU 34,819 32.7
read by other session 308,534 1,260 4 1.2 User I/O
direct path read 97,454 987 10 .9 User I/O
db file scattered read 71,870 910 13 .9 User I/O
Host CPU (CPUs: 8 Cores: 8 Sockets: 8)
~~~~~~~~ Load Average
Begin End %User %System %WIO %Idle
0.43 0.36 13.7 0.6 9.7 85.7
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~
% of total CPU for Instance: 13.5
% of busy CPU for Instance: 94.2
%DB time waiting for CPU - Resource Mgr: 0.0
Memory Statistics
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Begin End
Host Mem (MB): 49,152.0 49,152.0
SGA use (MB): 3,072.0 3,072.0
PGA use (MB): 506.5 629.1
% Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 7.28 7.53
Time Model Statistics
-> Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 106453.8s
-> Statistics including the word "background" measure background process
time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
-> Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name
Statistic Name Time (s) % of DB Time
sql execute elapsed time 105,531.1 99.1
DB CPU 34,818.8 32.7
parse time elapsed 714.7 .7
hard parse elapsed time 684.8 .6
PL/SQL execution elapsed time 161.9 .2
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time 44.2 .0
connection management call elapsed time 16.9 .0
hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time 10.2 .0
hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed time 9.4 .0
sequence load elapsed time 2.9 .0
repeated bind elapsed time 0.5 .0
failed parse elapsed time 0.0 .0
DB time 106,453.8
background elapsed time 1,753.9
background cpu time 61.7
Operating System Statistics
-> *TIME statistic values are diffed.
All others display actual values. End Value is displayed if different
-> ordered by statistic type (CPU Use, Virtual Memory, Hardware Config), Name
Statistic Value End Value
BUSY_TIME 3,704,415
IDLE_TIME 22,203,740
IOWAIT_TIME 2,517,864
NICE_TIME 3
SYS_TIME 145,696
USER_TIME 3,557,758
LOAD 0 0
RSRC_MGR_CPU_WAIT_TIME 0
VM_IN_BYTES 358,813,045,760
VM_OUT_BYTES 29,514,830,848
PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES 51,539,607,552
NUM_CPUS 8
NUM_CPU_CORES 8
NUM_CPU_SOCKETS 8
GLOBAL_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
GLOBAL_SEND_SIZE_MAX 1,048,586
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_DEFAULT 87,380
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MIN 4,096
TCP_SEND_SIZE_DEFAULT 16,384
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MIN 4,096
Operating System Statistics -
Snap Time Load %busy %user %sys %idle %iowait
29-Feb 03:00:27 0.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
29-Feb 04:00:35 1.4 11.9 11.2 0.6 88.1 14.3
29-Feb 05:00:41 1.7 13.8 13.2 0.6 86.2 15.8
29-Feb 06:00:48 1.5 14.0 13.5 0.6 86.0 12.3
29-Feb 07:01:00 1.8 16.3 15.8 0.5 83.7 10.4
29-Feb 08:00:12 2.6 23.2 22.5 0.6 76.8 12.6
29-Feb 09:00:26 1.3 16.6 16.0 0.5 83.4 5.7
29-Feb 10:00:33 1.2 13.8 13.3 0.5 86.2 2.0
29-Feb 11:00:43 1.3 14.5 14.0 0.5 85.5 3.8
29-Feb 12:00:47 0.4 4.9 4.2 0.7 95.1 10.6
Foreground Wait Class
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
-> Captured Time accounts for 97.9% of Total DB time 106,453.79 (s)
-> Total FG Wait Time: 69,415.64 (s) DB CPU time: 34,818.79 (s)
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait
Wait Class Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) %DB time
User I/O 14,693,843 0 69,222 5 65.0
DB CPU 34,819 32.7
Commit 40,629 0 119 3 0.1
System I/O 26,504 0 57 2 0.1
Network 1,945,010 0 11 0 0.0
Other 125,200 99 4 0 0.0
Application 2,673 0 2 1 0.0
Concurrency 3,059 0 1 0 0.0
Configuration 31 19 0 15 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
db file sequential read 14,092,706 0 65,613 5 108.0 61.6
read by other session 308,534 0 1,260 4 2.4 1.2
direct path read 97,454 0 987 10 0.7 .9
db file scattered read 71,870 0 910 13 0.6 .9
db file parallel read 35,001 0 372 11 0.3 .3
log file sync 40,629 0 119 3 0.3 .1
control file sequential re 26,504 0 57 2 0.2 .1
direct path read temp 14,499 0 49 3 0.1 .0
direct path write temp 9,186 0 28 3 0.1 .0
SQL*Net message to client 1,923,973 0 5 0 14.7 .0
SQL*Net message from dblin 1,056 0 5 5 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 8,848 0 2 0 0.1 .0
ASM file metadata operatio 36 0 2 54 0.0 .0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 2,636 0 1 1 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 472 0 1 1 0.0 .0
os thread startup 8 0 1 74 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data to clien 17,656 0 1 0 0.1 .0
asynch descriptor resize 123,852 100 0 0 0.9 .0
local write wait 110 0 0 4 0.0 .0
utl_file I/O 55,635 0 0 0 0.4 .0
log file switch (private s 8 0 0 52 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S wait on X 2 0 0 142 0.0 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 13 0 0 20 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Slave Session Stat 248 0 0 1 0.0 .0
enq: RO - fast object reus 18 0 0 11 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 2,511 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 195 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 12 0 0 8 0.0 .0
PX qref latch 54 100 0 2 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 995 0 0 0 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from dbl 300 0 0 0 0.0 .0
kksfbc child completion 1 100 0 56 0.0 .0
library cache: mutex X 244 0 0 0 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Signal ACK RSG 124 0 0 0 0.0 .0
undo segment extension 6 100 0 7 0.0 .0
PX Deq: Signal ACK EXT 124 0 0 0 0.0 .0
library cache load lock 3 0 0 9 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 45 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 12 0 0 2 0.0 .0
reliable message 28 0 0 1 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 72 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: row cache objects 14 0 0 1 0.0 .0
enq: SQ - contention 17 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch free 32 0 0 0 0.0 .0
buffer busy waits 52 0 0 0 0.0 .0
enq: PS - contention 16 0 0 0 0.0 .0
enq: TX - row lock content 6 0 0 1 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to dblink 1,018 0 0 0 0.0 .0
cursor: pin S 23 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers lru c 8 0 0 0 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message from clien 1,923,970 0 944,508 491 14.7
jobq slave wait 66,732 100 33,334 500 0.5
Streams AQ: waiting for me 6,481 100 32,412 5001 0.0
wait for unread message on 32,858 98 32,411 986 0.3
PX Deq: Execution Msg 1,448 0 190 131 0.0
PX Deq: Execute Reply 1,196 0 74 62 0.0
HS message to agent 228 0 4 19 0.0
single-task message 42 0 4 97 0.0
PX Deq Credit: send blkd 904 0 2 3 0.0
PX Deq Credit: need buffer 205 0 1 3 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
PX Deq: Table Q Normal 4,291 0 1 0 0.0
PX Deq: Join ACK 124 0 0 1 0.0
PX Deq: Parse Reply 124 0 0 0 0.0
KSV master wait 256 0 0 0 0.0
Latch Miss Sources
-> only latches with sleeps are shown
-> ordered by name, sleeps desc
NoWait Waiter
Latch Name Where Misses Sleeps Sleeps
ASM map operation freeli kffmTranslate2 0 2 0
DML lock allocation ktadmc 0 2 0
FOB s.o list latch ksfd_allfob 0 2 2
In memory undo latch ktiFlushMe 0 5 0
In memory undo latch ktichg: child 0 3 0
PC and Classifier lists No latch 0 6 0
Real-time plan statistic keswxAddNewPlanEntry 0 20 20
SQL memory manager worka qesmmIRegisterWorkArea:1 0 1 1
active service list kswslogon: session logout 0 23 12
active service list kswssetsvc: PX session swi 0 6 1
active service list kswsite: service iterator 0 1 0
archive process latch kcrrgpll 0 3 3
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr_2 0 1,746 573
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path (cr pin 0 1,024 2,126
cache buffers chains kcbgcur_2 0 60 8
cache buffers chains kcbchg1: kslbegin: bufs no 0 16 3
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path 0 14 20
cache buffers chains kcbzibmlt: multi-block rea 0 10 0
cache buffers chains kcbrls_2 0 9 53
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: kslbegin shared 0 8 1
cache buffers chains kcbrls_1 0 7 84
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: kslbegin excl 0 6 14
cache buffers chains kcbnew: new latch again 0 6 0
cache buffers chains kcbzgb: scan from tail. no 0 6 0
cache buffers chains kcbzwb 0 5 8
cache buffers chains kcbgcur: fast path (shr) 0 3 0
cache buffers chains kcbget: pin buffer 0 3 0
cache buffers chains kcbzhngcbk2_1 0 1 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbzgws 0 19 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbo_link_q 0 3 0
call allocation ksuxds 0 14 10
call allocation ksudlp: top call 0 2 3
enqueue hash chains ksqgtl3 0 2 1
enqueue hash chains ksqrcl 0 1 2
enqueues ksqgel: create enqueue 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_unlink_q 0 5 2
object queue header oper kcbo_sw_buf 0 2 0
object queue header oper kcbo_link_q 0 1 2
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_cq 0 1 2
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_mq_bg 0 1 4
parallel query alloc buf kxfpbalo 0 1 1
process allocation ksucrp:1 0 2 0
process queue reference kxfpqrsnd 0 1 0
qmn task queue latch kwqmnmvtsks: delay to read 0 1 0
redo allocation kcrfw_redo_gen: redo alloc 0 17 0
row cache objects kqreqd: reget 0 6 0
row cache objects kqrpre: find obj 0 6 13
row cache objects kqrso 0 2 0
row cache objects kqreqd 0 1 2
row cache objects kqrpre: init complete 0 1 1
shared pool kghalo 0 199 106
shared pool kghupr1 0 39 109
shared pool kghfre 0 18 19
shared pool kghalp 0 7 29
space background task la ktsj_grab_task 0 21 27
Mutex Sleep Summary
-> ordered by number of sleeps desc
Wait
Mutex Type Location Sleeps Time (ms)
Library Cache kglhdgn2 106 338 12
Library Cache kgllkc1 57 259 10
Library Cache kgllkdl1 85 123 21
Cursor Pin kkslce [KKSCHLPIN2] 70 286
Library Cache kglget2 2 31 1
Library Cache kglhdgn1 62 31 2
Library Cache kglpin1 4 26 1
Library Cache kglpnal1 90 18 0
Library Cache kglpndl1 95 15 2
Library Cache kgllldl2 112 6 0
Library Cache kglini1 32 1 0
-------------------------------------------------------------Thanks in advance.Hi,
Thanks for reply.
I provided one hour report.
Inst Num Startup Time Release RAC
1 27-Feb-12 09:03 11.2.0.2.0 NO
Platform CPUs Cores Sockets Memory(GB)
Linux x86 64-bit 8 8 8 48.00
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess
Begin Snap: 5606 29-Feb-12 04:00:35 63 3.7
End Snap: 5607 29-Feb-12 05:00:41 63 3.6
Elapsed: 60.11 (mins)
DB Time: 382.67 (mins)
Cache Sizes Begin End
~~~~~~~~~~~ ---------- ----------
Buffer Cache: 1,952M 1,952M Std Block Size: 16K
Shared Pool Size: 1,024M 1,024M Log Buffer: 18,868K
Load Profile Per Second Per Transaction Per Exec Per Call
~~~~~~~~~~~~ --------------- --------------- ---------- ----------
DB Time(s): 6.4 0.8 0.03 0.03
DB CPU(s): 1.0 0.1 0.00 0.00
Redo size: 84,539.3 10,425.6
Logical reads: 23,345.6 2,879.1
Block changes: 386.5 47.7
Physical reads: 1,605.0 197.9
Physical writes: 7.1 0.9
User calls: 233.9 28.9
Parses: 4.0 0.5
Hard parses: 0.1 0.0
W/A MB processed: 0.1 0.0
Logons: 0.1 0.0
Executes: 210.9 26.0
Rollbacks: 0.0 0.0
Transactions: 8.1
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.62 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 95.57 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 99.90 Soft Parse %: 98.68
Execute to Parse %: 98.10 Latch Hit %: 99.99
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 32.08 % Non-Parse CPU: 99.90
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 89.25 89.45
% SQL with executions>1: 96.79 97.52
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 95.67 96.56
Top 5 Timed Foreground Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Avg
wait % DB
Event Waits Time(s) (ms) time Wait Class
db file sequential read 3,054,464 17,002 6 74.0 User I/O
DB CPU 3,748 16.3
read by other session 199,603 796 4 3.5 User I/O
direct path read 46,301 439 9 1.9 User I/O
db file scattered read 21,113 269 13 1.2 User I/O
Host CPU (CPUs: 8 Cores: 8 Sockets: 8)
~~~~~~~~ Load Average
Begin End %User %System %WIO %Idle
1.45 1.67 13.2 0.6 15.8 86.2
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~
% of total CPU for Instance: 13.0
% of busy CPU for Instance: 94.7
%DB time waiting for CPU - Resource Mgr: 0.0
Memory Statistics
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Begin End
Host Mem (MB): 49,152.0 49,152.0
SGA use (MB): 3,072.0 3,072.0
PGA use (MB): 513.5 467.7
% Host Mem used for SGA+PGA: 7.29 7.20
Time Model Statistics
-> Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 22960.5s
-> Statistics including the word "background" measure background process
time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
-> Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name
Statistic Name Time (s) % of DB Time
sql execute elapsed time 22,835.9 99.5
DB CPU 3,748.4 16.3
parse time elapsed 15.4 .1
hard parse elapsed time 14.3 .1
PL/SQL execution elapsed time 7.5 .0
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time 6.0 .0
connection management call elapsed time 1.6 .0
sequence load elapsed time 0.4 .0
hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time 0.0 .0
repeated bind elapsed time 0.0 .0
failed parse elapsed time 0.0 .0
DB time 22,960.5
background elapsed time 238.1
background cpu time 4.9
Operating System Statistics
-> *TIME statistic values are diffed.
All others display actual values. End Value is displayed if different
-> ordered by statistic type (CPU Use, Virtual Memory, Hardware Config), Name
Statistic Value End Value
BUSY_TIME 396,506
IDLE_TIME 2,483,725
IOWAIT_TIME 455,495
NICE_TIME 0
SYS_TIME 16,163
USER_TIME 380,052
LOAD 1 2
RSRC_MGR_CPU_WAIT_TIME 0
VM_IN_BYTES 95,646,943,232
VM_OUT_BYTES 1,686,059,008
PHYSICAL_MEMORY_BYTES 51,539,607,552
NUM_CPUS 8
NUM_CPU_CORES 8
NUM_CPU_SOCKETS 8
GLOBAL_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
GLOBAL_SEND_SIZE_MAX 1,048,586
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_DEFAULT 87,380
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_RECEIVE_SIZE_MIN 4,096
TCP_SEND_SIZE_DEFAULT 16,384
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MAX 4,194,304
TCP_SEND_SIZE_MIN 4,096
Operating System Statistics -
Snap Time Load %busy %user %sys %idle %iowait
29-Feb 04:00:35 1.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
29-Feb 05:00:41 1.7 13.8 13.2 0.6 86.2 15.8
Foreground Wait Class
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
-> Captured Time accounts for 97.6% of Total DB time 22,960.46 (s)
-> Total FG Wait Time: 18,651.75 (s) DB CPU time: 3,748.35 (s)
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait
Wait Class Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) %DB time
User I/O 3,327,253 0 18,576 6 80.9
DB CPU 3,748 16.3
Commit 23,882 0 69 3 0.3
System I/O 1,035 0 3 3 0.0
Network 842,393 0 2 0 0.0
Other 10,120 99 0 0 0.0
Configuration 3 0 0 58 0.0
Application 264 0 0 1 0.0
Concurrency 1,482 0 0 0 0.0
Foreground Wait Events
-> s - second, ms - millisecond - 1000th of a second
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % DB
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
db file sequential read 3,054,464 0 17,002 6 104.5 74.0
read by other session 199,603 0 796 4 6.8 3.5
direct path read 46,301 0 439 9 1.6 1.9
db file scattered read 21,113 0 269 13 0.7 1.2
log file sync 23,882 0 69 3 0.8 .3
db file parallel read 4,727 0 68 14 0.2 .3
control file sequential re 1,035 0 3 3 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to client 840,792 0 2 0 28.8 .0
direct path read temp 95 0 2 18 0.0 .0
local write wait 79 0 0 4 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 870 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ASM file metadata operatio 4 0 0 50 0.0 .0
log file switch (private s 3 0 0 58 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 36 0 0 3 0.0 .0
enq: RO - fast object reus 5 0 0 16 0.0 .0
latch: cache buffers chain 1,465 0 0 0 0.1 .0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 256 0 0 0 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 10,059 100 0 0 0.3 .0
SQL*Net more data to clien 1,510 0 0 0 0.1 .0
enq: KO - fast object chec 3 0 0 8 0.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 91 0 0 0 0.0 .0
latch: shared pool 14 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 5 0 0 1 0.0 .0
reliable message 8 0 0 0 0.0 .0
direct path write temp 1 0 0 2 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message from clien 840,794 0 68,885 82 28.8
jobq slave wait 7,365 100 3,679 499 0.3
Streams AQ: waiting for me 721 100 3,605 5000 0.0
wait for unread message on 3,648 98 3,603 988 0.1
KSV master wait 20 0 0 0 0.0
Background Wait Events
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
-> Only events with Total Wait Time (s) >= .001 are shown
-> %Timeouts: value of 0 indicates value was < .5%. Value of null is truly 0
Avg
%Time Total Wait wait Waits % bg
Event Waits -outs Time (s) (ms) /txn time
log file parallel write 29,353 0 83 3 1.0 34.8
db file parallel write 5,753 0 17 3 0.2 6.9
db file sequential read 1,638 0 15 9 0.1 6.1
control file sequential re 5,142 0 13 2 0.2 5.4
os thread startup 140 0 8 58 0.0 3.4
control file parallel writ 1,440 0 8 6 0.0 3.4
log file sequential read 304 0 8 26 0.0 3.3
db file scattered read 214 0 2 9 0.0 .8
ASM file metadata operatio 1,199 0 1 1 0.0 .3
direct path write 35 0 0 6 0.0 .1
direct path read 41 0 0 5 0.0 .1
kfk: async disk IO 6 0 0 9 0.0 .0
Disk file operations I/O 1,266 0 0 0 0.0 .0
ADR block file read 16 0 0 2 0.0 .0
read by other session 3 0 0 8 0.0 .0
Log archive I/O 2 0 0 10 0.0 .0
log file sync 3 0 0 5 0.0 .0
asynch descriptor resize 341 100 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS initialization 1 0 0 6 0.0 .0
log file single write 4 0 0 1 0.0 .0
latch: redo allocation 3 0 0 1 0.0 .0
ADR block file write 5 0 0 1 0.0 .0
LGWR wait for redo copy 45 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: query 6 0 0 0 0.0 .0
CSS operation: action 1 0 0 1 0.0 .0
SQL*Net message to client 420 0 0 0 0.0 .0
rdbms ipc message 47,816 39 61,046 1277 1.6
DIAG idle wait 7,200 100 7,200 1000 0.2
Space Manager: slave idle 1,146 98 5,674 4951 0.0
class slave wait 284 0 3,983 14026 0.0
dispatcher timer 61 100 3,660 60006 0.0
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 258 50 3,613 14003 0.0
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 130 0 3,613 27789 0.0
Streams AQ: waiting for ti 7 71 3,608 515430 0.0
wait for unread message on 3,605 100 3,606 1000 0.1
pmon timer 1,201 100 3,604 3001 0.0
smon timer 15 73 3,603 240207 0.0
ASM background timer 754 0 3,602 4777 0.0
shared server idle wait 120 100 3,601 30006 0.0
SQL*Net message from clien 554 0 4 7 0.0
KSV master wait 101 0 0 2 0.0
Wait Event Histogram
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
ADR block file read 52 73.1 1.9 9.6 13.5 1.9
ADR block file write 10 100.0
ADR file lock 12 100.0
ARCH wait for archivelog l 3 100.0
ASM file metadata operatio 1203 97.3 .5 .7 .3 .2 .9
CSS initialization 1 100.0
CSS operation: action 1 100.0
CSS operation: query 6 83.3 16.7
Disk file operations I/O 2118 95.4 4.5 .1
LGWR wait for redo copy 45 100.0
Log archive I/O 2 100.0
SQL*Net break/reset to cli 256 99.6 .4
SQL*Net message to client 839.9 100.0 .0
SQL*Net more data from cli 91 100.0
SQL*Net more data to clien 1503 100.0
asynch descriptor resize 10.4K 100.0
buffer busy waits 2 100.0
control file parallel writ 1440 5.7 35.1 24.0 16.3 12.0 5.5 1.5
control file sequential re 6177 69.4 7.5 5.9 8.1 7.1 1.7 .3
db file parallel read 4727 1.7 3.2 3.2 10.1 46.6 33.3 1.8
db file parallel write 5755 42.3 21.3 18.6 11.2 4.6 1.4 .5
db file scattered read 21.5K 8.4 4.3 11.9 18.9 26.3 25.3 4.9
db file sequential read 3053. 28.7 15.1 11.1 17.9 21.5 5.4 .3 .0
direct path read 46.3K 9.9 8.8 18.5 21.7 22.8 15.7 2.7
direct path read temp 95 9.5 9.5 23.2 49.5 8.4
direct path write 35 11.4 31.4 17.1 22.9 11.4 2.9 2.9
direct path write temp 1 100.0
enq: KO - fast object chec 3 66.7 33.3
enq: RO - fast object reus 5 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
kfk: async disk IO 6 50.0 16.7 16.7 16.7
latch free 3 100.0
latch: cache buffers chain 1465 100.0
latch: cache buffers lru c 1 100.0
latch: object queue header 2 100.0
latch: redo allocation 3 33.3 33.3 33.3
latch: row cache objects 2 100.0
latch: shared pool 15 93.3 6.7
local write wait 79 35.4 34.2 21.5 8.9
log file parallel write 29.4K 47.8 21.7 11.9 9.9 6.8 1.6 .3
log file sequential read 304 6.3 3.0 3.6 10.2 23.4 24.3 29.3
log file single write 4 25.0 75.0
log file switch (private s 3 100.0
log file sync 23.9K 40.9 28.0 12.9 9.7 6.7 1.5 .3
os thread startup 140 100.0
read by other session 199.6 37.1 19.9 12.9 13.1 13.8 3.1 .2
reliable message 8 100.0
ASM background timer 755 2.9 .4 .1 .1 .3 .1 .3 95.8
DIAG idle wait 7196 100.0
KSV master wait 121 88.4 2.5 3.3 2.5 .8 .8 1.7
SQL*Net message from clien 840.1 97.1 1.8 .5 .2 .2 .1 .0 .1
Space Manager: slave idle 1147 .1 .5 99.4
Streams AQ: qmn coordinato 258 49.6 .4 50.0
Streams AQ: qmn slave idle 130 .8 99.2
Streams AQ: waiting for me 721 100.0
Streams AQ: waiting for ti 7 28.6 42.9 28.6
class slave wait 283 39.9 2.5 2.5 3.5 4.9 9.2 15.2 22.3
dispatcher timer 60 100.0
jobq slave wait 7360 .0 .0 .0 99.9
pmon timer 1201 100.0
rdbms ipc message 47.8K 2.7 31.6 17.4 1.1 1.1 .9 20.9 24.3
Wait Event Histogram DB/Inst: I2KPROD/I2KPROD Snaps: 5606-5607
-> Units for Total Waits column: K is 1000, M is 1000000, G is 1000000000
-> % of Waits: value of .0 indicates value was <.05%; value of null is truly 0
-> % of Waits: column heading of <=1s is truly <1024ms, >1s is truly >=1024ms
-> Ordered by Event (idle events last)
% of Waits
Total
Event Waits <1ms <2ms <4ms <8ms <16ms <32ms <=1s >1s
shared server idle wait 120 100.0
smon timer 16 6.3 93.8
wait for unread message on 7250 .1 99.9
Latch Miss Sources
-> only latches with sleeps are shown
-> ordered by name, sleeps desc
NoWait Waiter
Latch Name Where Misses Sleeps Sleeps
In memory undo latch ktichg: child 0 1 0
active service list kswslogon: session logout 0 2 0
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr_2 0 1,123 483
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path (cr pin 0 496 1,131
cache buffers chains kcbrls_2 0 5 6
cache buffers chains kcbgcur_2 0 4 0
cache buffers chains kcbgtcr: fast path 0 3 1
cache buffers chains kcbzwb 0 2 4
cache buffers chains kcbchg1: kslbegin: bufs no 0 1 0
cache buffers chains kcbnew: new latch again 0 1 0
cache buffers chains kcbrls_1 0 1 6
cache buffers chains kcbzgb: scan from tail. no 0 1 0
cache buffers lru chain kcbzgws 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_cq 0 1 0
object queue header oper kcbo_switch_mq_bg 0 1 2
redo allocation kcrfw_redo_gen: redo alloc 0 3 0
row cache objects kqrpre: find obj 0 1 1
row cache objects kqrso 0 1 0
shared pool kghalo 0 13 3
shared pool kghupr1 0 4 15
shared pool kghalp 0 1 0
space background task la ktsj_grab_task 0 2 2
------------------------------------------------------------- -
Performance issues in Reader 7
Hi,
We have a serious issue with performance in Reader 7. Our client is locked down to this version and we have developed our forms targeting this version in Designer but only recently discovered the performance problems. We seem to have pinpointed the problem to direct rendering in the form. When running the form in adobe reader 9, with direct rendering forced to off, we see the same symptoms that we saw on the adobe reader 7 client. The symptoms are that the memory usage of the acroRd32.exe process rises steadily as we interact with the form and does not come back down. After a time it becomes unusable as it takes about 25 seconds to move between fields. In version 9, with direct rendering on as default, this issue does not occur.
We disabled direct rendering in the XML source using:
<?originalXFAVersion http://www.xfa.org/schema/xfa-template/2.4/ LegacyRendering:1?>
Our client cannot upgrade their reader version and so we are in a very difficult position. If anyone can suggest a way to tackle this performance issue we will be very grateful.
Thanks,
KieranI'm working with Kieran on the same form and I think I have tracked the issue down to a difference between rendering methods in Adobe reader 7 and adobe reader 9. I drew up a benchmark test script and ran it before and after I disabled direct rendering. When runing the form in adobe reader 9, but with direct rendering forced to off. I see the same symptoms that I saw on the adobe reader 7 client.
I disabled direct rendering using:
<?originalXFAVersion http://www.xfa.org/schema/xfa-template/2.4/ LegacyRendering:1?>
Does anyone know of particular objects or methods that might be handled poorly by the legacy rendering mode found in adobe reader 7 (XFA 2.4 and earlier)?
Thanks
David -
Oracle 9i reading BLOB performance issues
Windows XP Pro SP2
JDK 1.5.0_05
Oracle 9i
Oracle Thin Driver for JDK 1.4 v.10.2.0.1.0
DBCP v.1.2.1
Spring v1.2.7 (I am using the JDBC template for convenience)
I have run into serious performance issues reading BLOBs from Oracle using oracle's JDBC thin driver. I am not sure if it a constraint/mis-configuration with oracle or a JDBC problem.
I am hoping that someone has some experience accessing multi-MB BLOBs under heavy volume.
We are considering using Oracle 8 or 9 as a document repository. It will end up storing hundreds of thousands of PDFs that can be as large as 30 MBs. We don't have access to Oracle 10.
TESTS
I am running tests against Oracle 8 and 9 to simulate single and multi-threaded document access. Out goal is to get a sense of KBps throughput and BLOB data access contention.
DATA
There is a single test table with 100 rows. Each row has a PK id and a BLOB field. The blobs range in size from a few dozen KB to 12MB. They represent a valid sample of production data. The total data size is approx. 121 MBs.
Single Threaded Test
The test selects a single blob object at a time and then reads the contents of the blob's binary input stream in 2 KB chunks. At the end of the test, it will have accessed all 100 blobs and streamed all 121 MBs. The test harness is JUnit.
8i Results: On 8i it starts and terminates successfully on a steady and reliable basis. The throughput hovers around 4.8 MBps.
9i Results: Similar reliability to 8i. The throughput is about 30% better.
Multi-Threaded Test
The multi-threaded test uses the same "blob reader" functionality used in the single threaded test. However, it spawns 8 threads each running a separate "blob reader".
8i Results: The tests successfully complete on a reliable basis. The aggregate throughput of all 8 threads is a bit more than 4.8 MBps.
9i Results: Erratic. The tests were highly erratic on 9i. Threads would intermittently lock when accessing a BLOB's output stream. Sometimes they lock accessing data from the same row, othertimes it is distinct rows. The number and the timing of the thread "locks" is indeterminate. When the test completed successfully the aggregate throughput of the 8 threads was approx. 5.4 MBps.
I would be more than happy to post code or the data model if that would help.
CarlosHi Murphy16,
Try investigate where are the principal issues in your RAC system.
Check:
* Expensive SQL's;
* Sorts in disks;
* Wait Events;
* Interconnect hardware issues;
* Applications doing unnecessary manual LOCKs (SQL);
* If SGA is adequatly sized (take care to not use of SWAP space "DISK");
* Backup's and unnecessary jobs running at business time (Realocate this jobs and backups to night window or a less intensive work hour at database);
* Rebuild indexes and identify tables that must be reorganized (fragmentation);
* Verify another software consuming resources on your server;
Please give us more info about your environment. The steps above are general, but you can use to guide u in basic performance issues.
Regards,
Rodrigo Mufalani
http://mufalani.blogspot.com -
Oracle 9i Performance Issue High Physical Reads
Dear All,
I have Oracle 9i Release 9.2.0.5.0 database under HP Unix, I have run the query and got following output. Can any body just have a look and advise what to do in the following situation? We have performance issues.
Many thanks in advance
Buffer Pool Advisory for DB: DBPR Instance: DBPR End Snap: 902
-> Only rows with estimated physical reads >0 are displayed
Size for Size Buffers for Est Physical Estimated
P Estimate (M) Factr Estimate Read Factor Physical Reads
D 416 .1 51,610 4.27 1,185,670,652
D 832 .2 103,220 2.97 825,437,374
D 1,248 .3 154,830 2.03 563,139,985
D 1,664 .4 206,440 1.49 412,550,232
D 2,080 .5 258,050 1.32 366,745,510
D 2,496 .6 309,660 1.23 340,820,773
D 2,912 .7 361,270 1.14 317,544,771
D 3,328 .8 412,880 1.09 301,680,173
D 3,744 .9 464,490 1.04 288,191,418
D 4,096 1.0 508,160 1.00 276,929,627Hi,
Actually you didnt give the exact problem statement.
Seems to be your database is I/O bound. Ok, do the following one by one:
1. Identify the FTS queries and try to create the optimal indexes (depending on the disk reads factor!!) on the problem queries.
2. To reduce the 276M physical reads, you need to allocate more memory to db_cache_size. try 8GB (initially) and then depending on the buffer advisery you can increase further if you have more memory on the box.
3. as a Next step , configure KEEP and RECYCLE cache to get the benefits of reduced I/O by multiple pools. Allocate objects to the KEEP/RECYCLE pools.
Thanks, -
Adobe Reader 9 - multiple instances performance issue
Dear all, I am having some performance issues regarding adobe reader, but only when running multiple instances. Opening a single, relatively small pdf ( 418kb ) works perfect, but adding to the list of open flies another very small file ( 102kb ), the cpu usage jumps to cca. 53% mouse movements become jumpy and the cooling fan goes nuts. Nothing helps until the second file I've opened is closed. Closing only the first instance doesn't help at all.
This happens with any two files I've tried. Large, small, graphics or not. Hardware is not the issue.
Any ideas?
Kind regards,
VinceThis second file: is it one you made? Or does it happen with any
second file?
If it isn't your file, does the problem stop if you turn off
JavaScript?
Aandi Inston -
Report Performance Issue - Activity
Hi gurus,
I'm developing an Activity report using Transactional database (Online real time object).
the purpose of the report is to list down all contacts related activities and activities NOT related to Contact by activity owner (user id).
In order to fullfill that requirment I've created 2 report
1) All Activities related to Contact -- Report A
pull in Acitivity ID , Activity Type, Status, Contact ID
2) All Activities not related to Contact UNION All Activities related to Contact (Base report) -- Report B
to get the list of activities not related to contact i'm using Advanced filter based on result of another request which is I think is the part that slow down the query.
<Activity ID not equal to any Activity ID in Report B>
Anyone encountered performance issue due to the advanced filter in analytic before?
any input is really appriciated
Thanks in advanced,
FinaFina,
Union is always the last option. If you can get all record in one report, do not use union.
since all records, which you are targeting, are in the activity subject area, it is not nessecery to combine reports. add a column with the following logic
if contact id is null (or = 'Unspecified') then owner name else contact name
Hopefully, this is helping. -
Performance issues with class loader on Windows server
We are observing some performance issues in our application. We are Using weblogic 11g with Java6 on a windows 2003 server
The thread dumps indicate many threads are waiting in queue for the native file methods:
"[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '106' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'" RUNNABLE
java.io.WinNTFileSystem.getBooleanAttributes(Native Method)
java.io.File.exists(Unknown Source)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getFileSource(ClasspathClassFinder.java:398)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getSourcesInternal(ClasspathClassFinder.java:347)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.ClasspathClassFinder.getSource(ClasspathClassFinder.java:316)
weblogic.application.io.ManifestFinder.getSource(ManifestFinder.java:75)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
weblogic.application.utils.CompositeWebAppFinder.getSource(CompositeWebAppFinder.java:71)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.MultiClassFinder.getSource(MultiClassFinder.java:67)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.CodeGenClassFinder.getSource(CodeGenClassFinder.java:33)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.findResource(GenericClassLoader.java:210)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.getResourceInternal(GenericClassLoader.java:160)
weblogic.utils.classloaders.GenericClassLoader.getResource(GenericClassLoader.java:182)
java.lang.ClassLoader.getResourceAsStream(Unknown Source)
javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport$4.run(Unknown Source)
java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
javax.xml.parsers.SecuritySupport.getResourceAsStream(Unknown Source)
javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.findJarServiceProvider(Unknown Source)
javax.xml.parsers.FactoryFinder.find(Unknown Source)
javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance(Unknown Source)
org.ajax4jsf.context.ResponseWriterContentHandler.<init>(ResponseWriterContentHandler.java:48)
org.ajax4jsf.context.ViewResources$HeadResponseWriter.<init>(ViewResources.java:259)
org.ajax4jsf.context.ViewResources.processHeadResources(ViewResources.java:445)
org.ajax4jsf.application.AjaxViewHandler.renderView(AjaxViewHandler.java:193)
org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.RenderResponseExecutor.execute(RenderResponseExecutor.java:41)
org.apache.myfaces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.render(LifecycleImpl.java:140)
On googling this seems to be an issue with java file handling on windows servers and I couldn't find a solution yet. Any recommendation or pointer is appreciatedHi shubhu,
I just analyzed your partial Thread Dump data, the problem is that the ajax4jsf framework ResponseWriterContentHandler triggers internally a new instance of the DocumentBuilderFactory; every time; triggering heavy IO contention because of Class loader / JAR file search operations.
Too many of these IO operations under heavy load will create excessive contention and severe performance degradation; regardless of the OS you are running your JVM on.
Please review the link below and see if this is related to your problem.. This is a known issue in JBOSS JIRA when using RichFaces / ajaxJSF.
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBPAPP-6166
Regards,
P-H
http://javaeesupportpatterns.blogspot.com/ -
Performance issues with flashed 7800GT (G5)
Hey,
I recently flashed a PC 7800GT with the 128K OEM NVidia ROM. It's one of the cards with a physical 128K ROM chip, so no worries there. However, it doesn't deliver the performance I expected. I have a Late 2005 2.0 DC, 10GB DDR2 and use Leopard 10.5.8.
This is what OS X puts out (german):
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT:
Chipsatz-Modell: GeForce 7800GT
Typ: Monitor
Bus: PCIe
Steckplatz: SLOT-1
PCIe-Lane-Breite: x16
VRAM (gesamt): 256 MB
Hersteller: NVIDIA (0x10de)
Geräte-ID: 0x0092
Versions-ID: 0x00a1
ROM-Version: 2152.2
Performance issues are: I can't seem to reach frame rates that are anywhere near the results provided by barefeats. Quake 3 runs with approx 200fps in 1600x1200x32 (I expected 300+ fps), Quake 4 and UT2004 run okay, but not on high settings with high resolutions. So, not equivalent to what you wouldd expect from the system's specs) Same goes for Colin McRae Rallye. Now, I remember reading about performance issues in 10.5.8 with the flashed ROM since it doesn't seem to be a 1:1 copy of the original one. I didn't try it in Tiger since I don't exactly want to go back from Leopard. Am I right that this is probably an issue of the "OEM ROM" (from the macelite)? Does anyone have the real deal in terms of 7800GT ROMs and could provide me with a link?
BrHi-
If you send me an email via my website, I can send you a couple of ROMs that might work better.
http://www.jcsenterprises.com/Japamacs_Page/All_Things_PPC.html
Problem with the flashed 256 MB GT, though, is that Leopard runs slow.
Bad driver interaction.....
The 512 MB GTX is the way to go........ -
Performance Issues with 10.6.7 and External USB Drives
I've had a few performance issues come up with the latest 10.6.7 that seem to be related to external USB drives. I have a 2TB USB drive tha I have my iMovie content on this drive and after 10.6.7 update, iMovie is almost unusable. Finder even seems slow when browsing files on this drive as well. It seems like any access to the drive is delayed in all applications. Before the update, the performance was acceptable, but now it almost unusable. Most of the files on this drive are large dv files.
Anyone else experience this?Matt,
If you want help, please start your own thread here:
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1339&start=0
And if your previous thread you aren't getting sufficient help for your iPhone, post a new topic here:
http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=1139
You'll get a wider audience, and won't confuse the original poster. Performance issues can be caused by numerous issues as outlined in my FAQ*
http://www.macmaps.com/Macosxspeed.html
If every person who had a performance issue posted to this thread, we'd never find a solution for the initial poster. Let's isolate each case one by one. It is NOT necessarily the same issue, even if the symptoms are the same. There are numerous contributing factors at work with computers, and if we don't isolate them, we'll never get to the root cause. -
Performance issues with LOV bindings in 3-tier BC4J architecture
We are running BC4J and JClient (Jdeveloper 9.0.3.4/9iAS 9.0.2) in a 3-tier architecture, and have problems with the performance.
One of our problems are comboboxes with LOV bindings. The view objects that provides data for the LOV bindings contains simple queries from tables with only 4-10 rows, and there are no view links or entity objects to these views.
To create the LOV binding and to set the model for the combobox takes about 1 second for each combobox.
We have tried most of tips in http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/tips/muench/jclientperf/index.html, but they do not seem to help on our problem.
The performance is OK (if not great) when the same code is running as 2-tier.
Does anyone have any good suggestions?I can recommend that you look at the following two bugs in Metalink: Bug 2640945 and Bug 3621502
They are related to the disabling of the TCP socket-level acknowledgement which slows down remote communications for EJB components using ORMI (the protocol used by Oracle OC4J) to communicate between remote EJB client and server.
A BC4J Application Module deployed as an EJB suffers this same network latency penalty due to the TCP acknowledgement.
A customer sent me information (that you'll see there as a part of Bug# 3621502) like this on a related issue:
We found our application runs very slow in 3-Tier mode (JClient, BC4J deployed
as EJB Session Bean on 9iAS server 9.0.2 enterprise edition). We spent a lot
of time to tune up our codes but that helped very little. Eventually, we found
the problem seemed to happen on TCP level. There is a 200ms delay in TCP
level. After we read some documents about Nagle Algorithm, we disabled a
registry key (TcpDelAckTicks) in windows2000 on both client and server. This
makes our program a lot faster.
Anyway, we think we should provide our clients a better solution other than
changing windows registry for them, for example, there may be a way to disable
that Nagle's algorithm through java.net.Socket.setTcpNoDelay(true), in BC4J,
or anywhere in our codes. We have not figured out yet.
Bug 2640945 was fixed in Oracle Application Server 10g (v9.0.4) and it now disables this TCP Acknowledgement on the server side in that release. In the BugDB, I see backport patches available for earlier 9.0.3 and 9.0.2 releases of IAS as well.
Bug 3621502 is requesting that that same disabling also be performed on the client side by the ORMI code. I have received a test patch from development to try out, but haven't had the chance yet.
The customer's workaround in the interim was to disable this TCP Acknowledgement at the OS level by modifying a Windows registry setting as noted above.
See Also http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?kbid=328890
"New registry entry for controlling the TCP Acknowledgment (ACK) behavior in Windows XP and in Windows Server 2003" which documents that the registry entry to change disable this acknowledgement has a different name in Windows XP and Windows 2003.
Hope this info helps. It would be useful to hear back from you on whether this helps your performance issue.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Delivery of two sale order in one delivery
Hiii Guru's, Can we make one delivery for two sale order of same customer? Plz reply fast. Will assign points. Regards, Abhishek
-
What is the recommended way to get a java.sql.Connection to the DB for ADF
How do I create a standalone database connection based on the datasource setup in ADF? I have seen code like this in a method of AppModuleImpl.java but that seems a bit of a hack. Connection conn = this.getDBTransaction().createStatement(0).getConnec
-
AirPlay not working after upgrade to Mountain Lion and iTunes 11
Hi all, Upgraded to Mountain Lion yesterday and to ITunes 11. My Bose Soundlink is "seen" by iTunes but no sound when connected. Volumes / Mute button checked just in case. Router restarted. MacBook Pro restarted. Any ideas ??
-
Hi, I am trying to obtain all bit info from a JPEG file. So far I have been able to read the file into a byte array, but how can I obtain the bit info from this array of bytes? Thanks.
-
ADC (Activity Data Collector) missing in 7.3 Portal
Hi guys, I've read a number of documents and blogs about the capabilities of ADC in the portal and how easy it should be setup in NetWeaver portal 7.3 However, I am looking at two different version NW 7,3 portals and ADC is nowhere to be seen. Accord