BTWifi hotspot 4 times faster than my home hub

Was having trouble with my connection so decided to try using a hotspot and was suprised at the speed it gets, i was lucky to get 3mb through my hub but can get just under 12mb with the hotspot by my house. Do hotspot speeds vary daily or would i be better off just using the hotspot from now on?

Keep trying to use this speed tester then carry out the further diagnostics and post back a screen shot of all the results including your IP profile for up and down. This test must be done with a wired connection.
http://speedtest.btwholesale.com/
If you have a Homehub 5 can you also post the stats from 1-12 by logging onto the homehub management pages then troubleshooting > helpdesk. http://bthomehub.home/

Similar Messages

Playback speed in Sample Editor window many, many times faster than track (at correct speed) in arrange area. How do I sync Sample Editor playback speed to correct speed/tempo in arrange area? Track is spoken word.

Playback speed in Sample Editor window many, many times faster than track (at correct speed) in arrange area. How do I sync Sample Editor playback speed to correct speed/tempo in arrange area? Track is spoken word. Sample Editor playback sounds like Alvin on a meth binge. Spoken phrase is generated from Textspeech. Textspeech can export files as WAV files or MP3 files. Perhaps a clue?: When exported Textspeech WAV file is dragged and dropped into track in arrange area of new project, it exhibits same supersonic speed. When Textspeech file is exported as MP3 file and dragged and dropped in arrange area track, it plays at correct speed.

Thanks Erik,
If nothing else, this huge list of updates and fixes, shows clearly that the Logic Dev team is working hard on fixing and improving LPX to a major degree.... and from the list of fixes done.. show they do read the bug reports submitted!
As an aside....
I recall how all the 'naysayers' prior to LPX (and in some cases, since...) were proclaiming how Logic was dead, the team was being disbanded, we won't see any further development, the Dev team doesn't listen or care... and so on....... I wonder where those people are now?

Mencoder H.264 20 times faster than Compressor 2

I tested mencoder with compressor running with 5 G5s. the H.264 implementation of mencoder was four times faster than the 5 dual core quads clustered with compressor two and queermaster . my single computer alone with just a dual 2 ghz processor encoded a movie 20 times faster than compressor with Queerrmaster on this same machine.
compressor costs more than mencoder(free in DVision). to get compressor you have to get an expensive Pro app.
What's wrong with this picture?

Well, I have heard this lament before with the G5s, and all I can say is that I guess Apple is slowly starting to drop support for the PowerPC generation (it was inevitable). I assume you've upgraded to 3.0.1?
As for Motion 3 (and someone correct me here if I am wrong), I believe it's slower because of the full 3D integration. Whether or not you have a lot of 3D aspects, I think it still calculates for it, causing your response and render time to decrease.

Web Report - ABAP Vs JAVA engine - ABAP 10 times faster than JAVA

Guys,
I want to share what we found in our project and see if any of you have insights
into our findings.We are on NW2004S SP14 and we are moving to SP15 in a couple of weeks.We created query, developed WAD for it and executing the WAD takes for this query takes 22 secs (Vs 2 secs using ABAP) the query output has 1 million records and most of the actions we take from that point on like right click on account takes 20 secs (Vs 0 secs/instant using ABAP) , drilldown to level 4 of account hierarchy takes 58 secs (Vs 5 secs using ABAP), drilldown on cost center level 6 takes 42 secs (Vs 4 secs using ABAP), , right click on cost center takes 32 secs (Vs 3 secs using ABAP), ..etc.
Basically every action we take in the JAVA report takes an average of 28 secs.There are 9 aggregates built on the cube that are barely hit by this query but the same query performing same actions with same selections hit the aggregates many many times.The questions I have is why is ABAP so fast compared to JAVA ? What is true explanation behind this behavior ? What are the dis-advantages by using ABAP engine ? Users are loving the performance and features of ABAP while they weren't really on board with the original JAVA report (as it was slow). ABAP is sure enough 10 times faster than JAVA. Query/Query Properties are exactly the same in ABAP and JAVA.Please explain.
Cheers
RT

Hi All,
Thanks to all you for your responses. I appreciate your time for going through my questions and coming forward to express your views.
However, I was looking for more specific "factual" answers. My question is "What does a client miss if they opt to install only ABAP based BI 7.0, as against JAVA Based BI 7.0"
thanks again.
Naga

"tp import all" runs 24 times faster than "tp import TR " for long queue?

After a test upgrade to ECC 6.0, I processed 1200 individual transports in 12 hours. When I rebuilt the queue of 1200 transports and processed "tp import all", it completed in 30 minutes.
Should I expect "tp import all" to process 24 times faster than individual imports?
800 transports were client independent (code) and 400 transports were client-specific (configuration).
What run times have you seen?
What problems with "tp import all" have you seen?
Best regards,
Gary Sherwood

Hi Gary
You don't know the 800 transports which are wating for the import, what could be render your system in case of import all. so, that's why , i will prefer to you import individual request instead of import all.
offcourse, Import all are faster than the individual because it prepare all steps once to start import,
Regards
Anwer Waseem

[Solved] ADF BC - PL/SQL block 6 times faster than CreateRow/InsertRow

THE ENVIRONMENT:
- JDeveloper 10.1.2.0.0
- Oracle 9.2.0.8.0
THE PROBLEM:
I found one of my pages in an ADF BC Web Application to be quite slow. After some profiling, I found a significant bottleneck in a loop which inserts approximately 270 rows in a table (only inserts into the table using insertRow). Would there be an improvement if we rewrite the transaction in PL/SQL code? To find out, I came up with the following simple test case:
1) Table
create table TES_FSOLICFONDO
ID_SOLICITUD NUMBER not null,
A_PAIS VARCHAR2(2),
C_IDEMPRESA NUMBER,
A_CODMONEDA VARCHAR2(3),
C_LOCAL NUMBER,
D_FECSOLICIT DATE,
C_IDBILLMONE NUMBER not null,
M_MONTO NUMBER,
A_CREADOPOR VARCHAR2(30),
D_CREACION DATE,
A_MODIFPOR VARCHAR2(30),
D_MODIF DATE);
alter table TES_FSOLICFONDO
add primary key (ID_SOLICITUD);
create index IND_TES_FSOLICFONDO_01 on TES_FSOLICFONDO (C_IDBILLMONE, C_LOCAL, D_FECSOLICIT);
create index IND_TES_FSOLICFONDO_02 on TES_FSOLICFONDO (C_IDEMPRESA, A_CODMONEDA, C_LOCAL, D_FECSOLICIT,C_IDBILLMONE);
2) Sequence
create sequence SEQ_TES_FSOLICFONDO
minvalue 1
maxvalue 999999999999999999999999999
start with 1
increment by 1
cache 2;
3) ADF BC
- Create a Business Components Project with a BC package
- Create new Entity Object based on the previous table, with standard wizard settings (this will be named TesFsolicfondo)
- Create new View Object linked to previous Entity Object, with standard wizard settings (this will be named TesFsolicfondoVO).
- Create an Application Module named AMTESAsignaSuperAvance, and include the previous View Object in the Data Model
4) The test case
- Create a test() method in the AMTESAsignaSuperAvanceImpl class as follows:
public void test() throws Exception
TesFsolicfondoVOImpl solVO = getTesFsolicfondoVO1();
TesFsolicfondoVORowImpl r = null;
for (int i = 0; i < 270; i++)
r = (TesFsolicfondoVORowImpl) solVO.createRow();
Sequence seq = new Sequence("SEQ_TES_FSOLICFONDO",this);
r.setIdSolicitud(new Number(seq.getData().toString()));
r.setAPais("PE");
r.setCIdempresa(new Number(637292));
r.setACodmoneda("USD");
r.setCLocal(new Number(388));
r.setDFecsolicit(new Date("2006-04-07"));
r.setCIdbillmone(new Number(116));
r.setMMonto(new Number(0));
r.setACreadopor("10000003480");
r.setDCreacion(new Date("2006-04-03"));
solVO.insertRow(r);
getTransaction().commit();
- Create a test.jsp page including the following code within a scriptlet:
AMTESAsignaSuperAvanceImpl am = null;
try
am = (AMTESAsignaSuperAvanceImpl) Configuration.createRootApplicationModule("cl.falabella.fpi.tes.bc.AMTESAsignaSuperAvance","AMTESAsignaSuperAvanceLocal");
am.test();
catch (Exception e)
am.getTransaction().rollback();
finally
Configuration.releaseRootApplicationModule(am,true);
- Create an equivalent PL/SQL block as follows:
BEGIN
FOR I IN 1..270
LOOP
INSERT INTO TES_FSOLICFONDO (ID_SOLICITUD, A_PAIS, C_IDEMPRESA, A_CODMONEDA, C_LOCAL,
D_FECSOLICIT, C_IDBILLMONE, M_MONTO, A_CREADOPOR, D_CREACION)
VALUES (SEQ_TES_FSOLICFONDO.NEXTVAL, 'PE', 637292, 'USD', 388, TO_DATE('07-04-2006', 'DD-MM-YYYY'), 116, 0,
'10000003480', TO_DATE('03-04-2006', 'DD-MM-YYYY'));
END LOOP;
COMMIT;
END;
THE RESULTS:
The PL/SQL block was executed on a standard SQL* Plus window, and the test() method within the AM was called from the test.jsp page.
The PL/SQL block takes 1125 milliseconds in my setup, the test() method within the AM takes 6017 milliseconds, so PL/SQL is about 6 times faster in this test.
THE QUESTION:
Is this supposed to be this way? I want to avoid creating a PL/SQL package, I would rather use the ADF BC framework throughout the application. Would someone kindly point out any configuration issues I may have missed that will improve the BC performance?

Hello Jan,
Thanks for the tip, good to be born again as a name instead of a number.
I omitted the code used for timing, but here goes:
test.jsp:
java.util.Date d1 = new java.util.Date();
AMTESAsignaSuperAvanceImpl am = null;
try
am = (AMTESAsignaSuperAvanceImpl) Configuration.createRootApplicationModule("cl.falabella.fpi.tes.bc.AMTESAsignaSuperAvance","AMTESAsignaSuperAvanceLocal");
am.test();
catch (Exception e)
am.getTransaction().rollback();
finally
Configuration.releaseRootApplicationModule(am,true);
java.util.Date d2 = new java.util.Date();
System.out.println("Time (ms) = " + Double.toString(d2.getTime()-d1.getTime()));
PL/SQL:
I use a tool called "PL/SQL Developer". It has a "Command Window" with a user interface which is extremely similar to SQL* Plus. After running the PL/SQL code, it reported "PL/SQL procedure successfully completed in 1.125 seconds".
From the tool documentation:
The Command Window
The Command Window allows you to execute SQL scripts in a way that is very much similar to Oracle's SQL*Plus. To create a Command Window press the New button on the toolbar or select the New item in the File menu. A Command Window is created and you can type SQL and SQL*Plus commands like you are used to, without leaving PL/SQL Developer’s IDE.
Regards
Rodrigo

Time Capsule and BT Home Hub compatibility

Hi
I would be very grateful for your help.
I have a BT Home Hub (brand new) connected via ethernet cable to my Time Capsule (gen 4). I get the combination to work together OK (without switching off the BT Home Hub wireless), and I have the option of using the BT Home Hub wireless network too. I notice that the Time Capsule network is much less consistent than the direct BT Home Hub one. I also see that the BT Home Hub seems to have a much better coverage of the rooms in our house thean the Time Capsule network.
Is there some sort of conflict going on here? Should I permanently switch off the wireless router function on the BT Home Hub?
If I do straight speed checks - most of the time they both seem to perform similarly, yet every now and then - perhaps 3x weekly, the Time Capsule one just goes very slow or stops all together.
I was hoping the Time Capsule would give the best possible coverage around the house, so if that issue is not linked to the BT Home Hub compatibility issue, then are there different settings I should be trying on the Time Capsule via Air utility?
For completeness sake I also notice that the hourly back up sometimes fails as my iMac does not find the Time Casule every hour, and sometimes very small updates can take longer thah I would expect. Perhaps this is linked to the above, but perhaps not.
Anyway, I would be most grateful for your advice.
Best wishes,
David

Hmmm.. TC should auto select channel to not interfere with the Home Hub.. but the home hub might also be set to auto.. this means you have auto-auto.. and no controller who dictates the terms. Set fixed wireless channels.. and keep them separated as far as possible from each other. Even using EOP or long ethernet even better to run the TC in some wireless dark area of the house.
In my case I have a Thomson G wireless adsl modem.. and it beats the TC wireless hands down at the other end of the house.. simple fact is, the TC is no wireless power house.. regardless of Apple's so called improvements to the antennas and power output. The design is just not good for wireless.
So for 2.4ghz there are only 3 non-overlapping channels, 1, 6, 11 (13 in UK).. I recommend you set the BT to 1 and the TC to 11 or 13.
Use wireless names in the TC that are short no spaces pure alphanumeric.. and use wpa2 Personal security.
That is about the best you can do.. I like to force 5ghz to a different name.. so I can select it and it is much faster if you are in range.. but 5ghz has poor range.

Time Capsule and BT Home Hub

Hi
Has anyone had any luck getting a Time Capsule to work with a BT Home Hub? (Reading this forum I wonder if any one has a TC running at all!)
One minute the AirPort Utility picks it up the next it does not locate it. Sometimes the TC will not pick up IP address. At one point I managed to change the name, the TC appeared in Finder, but then I could not connect to the drive. Then the AirPort Utility would not locate it.
The majority of times I am getting "An error occurred when attempting to update TC".
In summary a series of random issues that I cannot make head nor tail of at the stage. Turning it off and back on seems to help, but at no stage has the AP Util managed to completely sucesfully set up the TC.
Mark

I had an initial rejection message like you connecting to BT Hub, Mark.
I used the setup to add to my existing network (BT Hub) and the amber light on the front of the capsule just kept flashing, looking for a network. This was done wirelessly
So, I reset the capsule to factory settings by pressing the reset button on the back for 5 seconds amber flashes fast. I then restarted my computer and restarted the BT Hub
I then ran airport utility again. (No ethernet cable is connected, but running wirelessly) When the Time capsule appears in the left sidebar of airport utility and the IP address is picked up in the main window, I then clicked on continue. After naming the capsule and giving it a password, I then clicked on continue. When I got to the next window, I choose the top one 'I have a wireless network and want to add Time Capsule or replace an existing device on my network'
I then clicked continue and in the next window I chose the second option 'I want Time capsule to wirelessly join my current network'
In the next following window, your BT Hb will show in the first field, click on wireless security (I chose (WEP 40 BIT preset) and enter your BT Hub wireless key and repeat it into the next field.
Clicking next will give a summary of what the settings will be updated too.
When the final window appears, close it and wait for the steady green light appears at the frot of the capsule. Be patient and it will work.
If you go by the settings similar to mine you should be good to go.

How to set up time capsule with BT home hub 4.0 & Openreach

Idiots guide needed.
My TimeCapsule (year old model) had been running well from my BT Openreach box (without using the Home Hub 4.0) but recently had issues with connection dropping - BT said they've sorted out their end and can't see any remaining issues and can't offer me any more support if I'm not using the Home Hub 4.0
I reset the TC to run straight from the Openreach Box still have issues with wi-fi dropping in and out (both on ethernet and wi-fi).
Can I:....
1) set up Time Capsule running from BT Home Hub 4.0 which itself runs from BT Openreach white box (thus continuing to get support from BT)
or should i go back to
2) Time Capsule running straight from BT Openreach Box
Can some one post an idiots guide to either option?
Other stuff that may be important.
Macbook air running Yosemite (mid 2011 model)
Apple TV
Airportexpress
Time Capsule
2 x iphone 4s
Kids PC
Ethernet and wifi for above - I generally run everything hard wired via ethernet.

The easiest and sure way is to use bridge on the TC as the method of connection. The TC then becomes a device in your network and gets its IP from the main router that I presume BT supply.
Method is,
1. Plug the TC WAN port into the BT supplied modem by ethernet.
2. Plug the computer you are using for the setup into the TC by ethernet.
3. Run the airport utility .. go to internet tab on the top menu..
In the bottom option, Connection Sharing choose off (bridged mode)
4. Go to the wireless page and setup wireless connection as you like it.. using whichever band you want. And make sure security is set to the highest setting, wpa2 personal. Put in a decent wireless passkey.
5. Press the update and fix whatever else the TC will show as needing fixing.. usually security stuff.
6. You can then disconnect the ethernet and connect by wireless if you want. Any port on the TC will now be a LAN port, including WAN.
This is assuming BT supply a wireless router with built in vdsl/other type of modem. If so you normally will not be able to bridge the modem, unless BT are using pppoe authentication which they haven't in the past.
If you really need to use the TC as a router then you will need to work out an alternative method. You can double NAT by placing the TC in the DMZ of the BT router if that is an option. It is not without issues in general.

How to connect airport time capsule to BT home hub 4

I am finding it difficult to connect my new airport time capsule (ATC) to the BT home hub 4. On opening the time machine it asks me to configure the time capsule before using. Should I be using the ATC as time machine only or should I be re-routing wireless from the ATC.

Make sure the MBA has ipv6 set to link-local only for wireless.
I strongly recommend using short names, no spaces and pure alphanumeric.
eg TCgen5 and TCwifi
In fact if you keep having wireless issues.. with the MBA in the same room as the TC, change the wireless name to TC24ghz and TC5ghz so you have different names for both bands and see if that doesn't help.. try to connect to this band and then the other.
Use WPA2 personal security.. password 8-20 characters mixed case and numbers.. no non-alphanumerics.
Do not hide the wireless.. that is against the code and simply leads to issues.
If you still have issues.. post back.. does the MBA work ok on other routers or wireless access points??

Connect Time Capsule to BT Home Hub ?

I recently purchased the Time Capsule and want to connect it to my BT Home Hub, using the Airport Utility on the CD that comes with Time Capsule I follow all the on screen prompts about adding it to my existing wireless network. The Time Capsule updates and then a message comes up about it re-starting, after this message closes the Airport Utility shows an error message and says that no Apple wireless device can be found. I have to reset the Time Capsule for it to show up on the list again
My BT Home Hub is WEP protected and I've seen a few posts and forums around the web saying that the Time Capsule is WPA protected. If that was the case why does it give the option for WEP passwords.
Anybody else had this problem or knows of a workaround ? - I don't want to have to change my security settings on my BT Home Hub to WPA/ WPA2 as this will have a knock on issue with other items I use on my wireless network.
Any assistance would be appreciated as I spent 5 hours last night playing around with settings to no avail - All I managed to connect was the Time Capsule to my Mac (just to make sure it was working).
Regards
Andrew

Silly question, but how should I initially set up the Time Capsule to set it as a secondary router ? by creating a new wireless network or something else - do I need to attached the ethernet cable from my main wireless BT Home Hub for intial set up ? *NOTE: I currently have the Time Capsule attached by wireless to my Mac so therfore cannot access the internet at the same time without changing network.
I'm currently at work so forgive the abbreviated exact terms for the selection process for adding the Time Capsule, should I select the first option from the list when prompted ie "to add or replace device on wireless network..." as oposed to selecting "add device to existing wireless network" ?
I understand about setting it to "bridge" just wondered the best way to get to that point to allow me to do that.
Any further assistance would be very much appreciated
Regards
Andrew

Time Capsule with BT Home Hub - 9 hours of trying to set up and counting...

Hi...I am at my wits end having spent two long evenings trying simply to connect a Time Capsule to an iMac. We have pored over the instructions, read all the postings in all the forums, probably in the entire world (OK, slight exaggeration) and tried every possible combination, and still we end up with a non-responsive Time Capsule (blinking amber light), and the Airport software saying "Waiting for the Time Capsule to restart" in a perpetual loop. The issues may well be around compatibility with the BT Home HUb, but there again they may not. There are no clues about why it fails so consistently in every combination. For the record, these are the combinations we have so far tried: ethernet connection from WAN port on TC to Ethernet port on Home Hub...A wired connection is established successfully. But then immediately the wireless connection wizard starts up, we can't turn it off, and the wireless connection wizard fails. We have tried it in all three combinations of the Wireless wizard. The end result is always the above, the blinking amber light.
We have tried adding the TC without any ethernet connection being involved in the first place. This was the most promising, we actually finally got a green light on the TC itself, but, crucially, NOT in the Airport software: that just hung in the same perpetual loop saying "waiting for Time capsule to restart", even though it CLEARLY HAD RESTARTED (because it gave us the green light). So, after about 9 hours and counting trying to get this "out of the box" solution simply to be recognised by a Mac computer, let alone connected to any other devices in the house (heaven forbid), we are now at our wit's end. Does anyone have any advice?

hi cprelude, I have the same or nearly the setup as you a BT HH V1 and a 500gb timecapsule this is hardwired to bt hh and works well so fear not it can be resolved. first hold the reset button on the HH with the TC disconnected, then while the HH is restarting unplug the TC for a couple of mins then replug inyour TC with the reset switch at the rear pushed in and then let the TC restart and plug in the ethernet cable to thr HH then use Airport utility to connect to the TC. then if all goes well you can set up two wireless networks first being the HH and the second the TC 5ghz. if I was you I would do the first backup on TC via ethernet as the first wireless backup can take hours and hours depending on the amount GBs you already have on your hard drive
good luck
john

Anyone else have time capsule and BT home hub 3 problems

I have a a home home hub 3 with Bt infinity. I have a time capsule connected to it by ethernet. both are creating wireless networks but whenever the time capsule is on I can not connect to the HH wireless network. Any suggestions?

Setup the TC wireless to manual settings so you can reinforce the HH3 and not compete with it.
So
1. The TC should be in bridge. Leave the HH to do routing duties.
2. Go to the TC wireless setup page.
Change the wireless name to match the HH3.
Change the security of the TC to match the HH3 or change the HH3 to match the TC.. only WPA2 AES = WPA2 Personal should be used.
Change to the same passkey.
3. The only difference you need between the two boxes is wireless channel. I recommend you set this manually.
In the TC use 11 or 13 in UK is also fine for 2.4ghz. Use 6 or 1 in the HH. And make sure it is set for 20mhz bandwidth not 40mhz. I do not have a HH to look at but all wireless in the presence of another WAP should automatically drop back to 20mhz.. but some device allow an override.. do not use or force 40mhz wireless.. it will cause issues.
Depending on the utility you use you may also have to set a channel for 5ghz in the TC.. use one of the lower channels for example 36-40.
4. You can also change the name of the 5ghz channel to force devices to use it.. if you are close by the 5ghz in the TC offers much higher speeds.
Does it make sense? I can give screenshots but I am running Snow Leopard on this computer and it is different in v6 utility on Lion or ML.
If you do use Lion you can install the v5 utility easily..
http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1482
For some manual setups it is much easier to use.

Why won't my 802.11 N work 5 times faster than my old Airport Extreme?

I called Apple Care to get assistance in setting up my new "n". No problems. Works like a charm, but was told by their wireless guru Richard that with my new MacBook Pro purchased in May with the 2ghz Intel Core Duo would not reach those fast speeds because you must have a different wireless chip that was installed this fall on the new Intel Core II Duo. I'm dissappointed and feel ripped off.
MacBook Pro 2GHZ Intel Core Duo Mac OS X (10.4.8)

He can't NOT use this becuase it does not have a
wireless n adapter, he can't use this because the
chipset was changed. That is why he should feel
ripped off, no pc would suffer this problem, he is
stuck. Apple should, based on their reputation, not
freeze out people who spend thousands of dollars on
their product.
Yes he can use this product (it is backwards compatible to 802.11 a/b/g). Excuse me, a PC is in the same condition, if Dell comes out with a newer version of their laptop with and n card in it, why would any previous version owner feel ripped off? You knew what you were buying when you bought it. I just bought a new truck last year, this year they came out with some improvements to that truck, am I supposed to feel ripped off because the added some new features? No I bought it knowing what it came with and the next years model will most likely have new features that I don't have. Come on. I guess companies should never improve their product and we should be stuck with same technology so we don't "feel ripped off" when they get improved. What kind of logic is that? I guess it must be PC logic. . .

Since I have Firefox 4 on my minilapatop, I type two or three times faster than the text in the browswer can keep up with. It results in parts of texts lost, when I am typing.

It's what I wrote above. I am not a fast typer, but when writing texts or composing e-mails, the texts cannot follow me and I loose texts. I have a small eee-PC with Windows 7 running. It worked great, until I upgraded to Firefox 4.

Sorry this is a user to user technical forum. There is NO APPLE here as stated in the term of use when you signed up for this forum.
here are some battery tips
http://osxdaily.com/2013/09/19/ios-7-battery-life-fix/
http://www.apple.com/batteries/iphone.html

BTWifi hotspot 4 times faster than my home hub

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for