Budget availability at purchase requisition

friends,
i need t code or sap img path, where to do settings for budget at purchase requisition level, because already i did entire FM configuratin, but still it is allowing to do the PR, even though budget is restricted.i am not able to understand wehere i am missing,
regards,

Hi
This error might appear even if G/L Accout could not be deteremined, hence pelase check your MM-FI integration part too.
If the G/L Account determination is happening, please check whether you have assgined Commitment item for all the G/L Accounts involved in that posting.
In addition to mentioning the commitment item in the G/L Account, you need to add the derivation rule in FMDERIVER too for picking the picking up the commitment item for G/L Account master data table (SKB1).
Regards
Edited by: Kash on Dec 23, 2009 3:53 PM

Similar Messages

  • Budget AVAC for Purchase requisitions

    Hi Guys,
    The requirement is like this.
    Budget AVAC  should be activated at PR level.However, the requirement is based on the approved PR's .In other words, if a user raises  a 10 Purchase requisitions and out of those 10 Purchase requisitions, only 5 PR's are approved then the AVAC should be for only 5 PR's only and not for the 10 PR's.
    Appreciate the experts help as to how to achieve this.
    Regards
    Judy

    Hi Judy,
    Budget get commit once you assign WBS to PR, you cant control that only if you  assign WBS to PR account assignmen, budget  get commit.
    Possible work around is raise PR with account assigment U & mension WBS only as text onTEXTS tab 7 send for approval
    Once PR approved convert PR to PO with correct account assigment WBS so that budget commit only for approved PR.
    hope this would help.
    regards,
    SL

  • Budget Approver for Purchase Requisition

    Hi,
    In MM setup for purchase requisition, 4 levels has been setup for approving based on amount. The person who will approve is configured to be determined based on user exit (value - 9) in TCode OMGQ.
    My question here is where is this user exit and how can we know to whom this PR will actually reach for approval.
    Please help me out.
    Regards,
    Binay Agarwal

    That you have to check in the Workflow settings based on the organization defined in PPOME
    User exit M06B0001
    you ca check the logic of user exit in SMOD
    enter the above user eixt and display the component logic

  • MRP Vendor is not available in purchase requisition

    After running MD04 for particular material, purchase requisition is generated. But vendor is missing for that material.
    I have checked following settings:
    1. Source list
    2. Source list active for that material.
    3. Purchase info records.
    All above settings are perfect for that material.
    But still vendor is missed in purchase requisition generated in MRP.
    Please let me know where am i going wrong?

    As Ajit mentionned, the source list usage mus be set to 1.
    See note 206684
    The 'Source list usage in materials planning and control' indicator must be
    set to '1' or '2' ('2' if delivery schedules are meant to be generated).

  • Purchase requisitions to update as statistical?

    Hi all,
    We are trying to implement Funds Management.  I have excluded the value type purchase requisitions from Availability Control check as we do not require any budget check for purchase requisition.  Do I need to set this as a statistical update in IMG?
    Thanks and regards,
    maz

    Hi,
    Can you please check the ststus of Purchase Requisition in ECC whether it is released or block.This will not allow you to transfer the PR to SRM system.
    Thanks,
    AMIT

  • Changes in Budget checking during creation of purchase requisition

    Hi Experts,
    My client wants changes the current  Internal Order BUget checking. Currently Budget checking happens with availability control ie. 105% Suppose current budget is 8000. It will add 5% and Purchase reqn checks the fund available with 8400 less budget utlised, but client wants 8000 less budget utilised as they want to keep 5% aside for the unforseen cases.
    Cilent does not want to change the current availability setting i.e 105%, retaining that availability check, client wants to check the availability excluding tolerance. What is the solution for this.
    Appriciate your immediate response.
    Thanks & regards
    Veda Pandit

    Hi,
    I think you shall set 100 % limit for purchase order and purchase requisition and 105% for good receipt.
    You can do so in customizing "Define Tolerance Limits for Availability Control" , using the activity group.
    Paolo

  • Budget for Purchase requisition

    Hi everybody,
    Is there anyways that a budget can be done for balance sheet items?
    Scenario:
    Each and every purchase requisition raised should check for the available budget.
    Budget can be done for the P&L items through internal order likewise is there any possibility of doing the same for the inventory accounts

    Hi
    We have the same scenario.Generally for capital asset or high value items, budget approval is required.Budget approval is confirmed from finance people.
    If the PR needs budget approval, then follow Work flow procedure for release the PR. Assign the release points as finance people.A mail will automatically go to the finance controller and get it approve from them.
    Then make the PO for the asset.
    What I've suggested is MM point of view.
    Consult an FI consultant for Budget Approval.
    Thanks & regards
    Pranaya

  • Budget check at the purchase requisition stage

    Hello dear experts,
    I wish to make a credit (budget) check at the purchase requisition stage .
    The purpose is to get indication (even a warning message) about the budget availability before the user creates a purchase order.
    Any ideas about a way to accomplish the above?
    Thank you for your help
    bilya
    Moderator: Please, search before posting

    hi
    either you can use internal order scenario or Project System (PS) with WBS element
    allocate budget for order or Project and in customization maintain the budget profile and tolernace limit check

  • Budgeting through Internal Order - Issues in Purchase Requisition

    Hi All,
    I have posted the issue in ERP Matyerial Management Forum also, but since this has a lot to do with CO-Internal Order, so posting the same here.
    Objective: We want to activate Commitment Update and budgeting for Capital purchases thrugh Internal Order. Budgeting is done for IO.
    For the budgeting to get activated in Purchase requisition, Internal Order tagged to the Asset should be present/seen in the PR.
    For PR with Account assignment Cat as 'A', I am not able to see the Internal order (mapped to the asset) in PR. The field 'Internal Order' in PR is coming BLANK despite the fact that the Asset used in the PR has been tagged to a valid Internal Order (of the Object Class - Investment, with Commitment update activated).
    What other setting is missing?
    Pls note the following:
    1) Account assignment cat 'A' has been set to DISPLAY CO/PP order ( T code - OME9)
    Issue is that this field in the PR is NOT getting populated at all.
    2) Commitment management, Availability Control have also been activated in the system
    . Internal Order status management has also been checked.
    Any help in this respect will be highly appreciated
    Thanks
    Gayathri

    Hi Gayatri,
    when you are saying"budgeting for Capital purchases thrugh Internal Order",how do you use account assignment category "A"?
    if your requirement is budgeting for capital purchases through IO then you should use account assignment category in respective PR.Automatically it will control budget/commitment wrt those internal orders.
    Hope this helps you.
    Ashok

  • Purchase requisition against budget

    Hi
    If a Purchase Requisition is in the system and it has been approved by
    managers, but it has not yet been turned in to a Purchase Order, does
    the value of the purchase requisition show up as committed dollars on
    budget?
    I really appreciate your help.
    Thanks
    Kris

    PR/PO will appear as commitment values.
    In your case PR though approved will still show up as commitment.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • Do not want Budget check & Commitment value for purchase Requisition

    Hi Experts,
    I hope you all are doing well.
    My client's requirement is that at the time of Creation of Purchase Requisition there should be no budget check against WBS element and also Commitment value should not be for Purchase Requisition.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks & Regards

    Hi Gokul,
    Thanks for ur quick reply.
    I have done changes in tolerence limit (activated it for PO only).
    Now i created 1 Project PR of more than value of budget (system didnt check the Budget against WBS) but when i am trying to create PO with reference to same PR, system is giving error of budget. That is OK for me.
    Now my requirement is to not take PR value as commitment in my reports, i want only PO value in Commitment column of repport.
    I have read all 3 notes suggested by you. Can u tell me whcih one should i implement to stop PR value as commitment in reports.
    Thanks & Regards

  • Without crating purchase requisition ,shall we block/hold  some budget agai

    Hi All,
    Is there a way that  without crating purchase requisition ,shall we block/hold  some budget against a wbs. also we are using project level budgeting .for example I want to commit  100 budget without creating any PR/PO. Please suggest.
    With Thanks/Regards,
    Vivek
    Edited by: vivek tripathi on Mar 5, 2012 3:05 PM

    Hello Vivek,
    Gokul is correct, commitment is contributed to assigned value in CJ30. PR/PO process always increase the assigned value. This is standard SAP system. You have an option to deactivate the PR process in updating the assigned value. SAP note 1307755 could be applied.
    You may use ''save as completed' function in transaction MIR7, this is park process and commit to assigned value (see SAP note 178837) but this is involving PO process.
    Regards, Gordon

  • Availability check with Purchase Requisition / Production Or

    Hi,
    I want to configure the availability check in such a way that, system should first check the stock available. If there is no stock system should generate the Purchase requisition or Production order.
    Can you tell me the solution on the same.
    Regards
    Rahul

    Hi,
    We have the similar requirement & achieved through development.
    Eg: M1- stock = 55 ea
    order qtty M1- 100
    system confirms for 55 ea & remaining qtty, seperate line item will be created with TAB item category i.e. 45 ea.
    Used FM: AVAILABILITY_CHECK ( MV45AFZZ) & BAPI_MATERIAL_AVAILABILITY  to find the ATP stock in Include:MV45AFZB
    Regards,
    Reazuddin MD

  • Quick transaction for checking avalable budget for purchase requisition.

    Hallo to everyone,
    I'm in the engieering  and design dept., I'm responsable for creating purchase requisition.
    Once that the PR is created, how I can check in a quick view if there is a money according to the budget in the WBS element where PR is creted?
    I use this version of SAP
    thank you,
    Massimo

    Hi Cafagna,
    You can also use SAP standard report S_ALR_87013558 Budget/Actual/Commitmt/Rem.Plan/Assg., which will be very use full for actual, commitment and remaining  budget, please see below snapshot.
    Regards
    Javed

  • Budget compromise by releasing requisition purchase order (ME54N)

    hello Experts, please a consultant
    It is possible to configure in FM for the budget compromise at the time of the release of the requisition (ME54N) and not when creating the purchase requisition (ME51N)?
    greetings and thanks for the suggestions
    Augusto

    Hi,
    Do you mean consume the budget at the time of release and not on the creation? It won't be possible, due to prudence policy in PSM-FM. Imagine, creating a lot of PRs, which won't have effect at the budget and the lack or resources will be discovered only at their release.
    Of course, by modifying standard code, in theory, you can force this kind of logic, but I won't recommend it both from technical and functional reasons.
    Regards,
    Eli

Maybe you are looking for