Budget checking for services with "Unlilmited" indicator set

hi friends,
Under normal cases, the budget checking is happening properly for the services in a project.
But I have certain service activities where I require to set the "Unlimited" indicator set (in the service specification screen)and some other services where I set a value limit to the unplanned services (in the Limit section of the service specification screen).
In these cases, the budget checking is not happening as expected by the standard methods. Please note that the availability control is active.
Please help me out.
regards
Pratap.V

Hi Nitni,
Thanks for the prompt replies.
Now you have struck the point. Assume I have a budget of rs.50000. The planned services in PR is of Rs.20000 and I have set a limit of rs.50000 for the unplanned services in the same PR. Now my commitment is Rs.20000 only which is right.
In our specific case, the budget check will not happen at PR.
Now I am creating a PO of the above PR. So PO commt is rs.20000.
After this, when I go to the service entry sheet and enter a planned services of rs.20000 and unplanned services of rs.40000 (remember i set a 50000 limit for unplanned services in the PR). Hence my total actual cost is rs.60000. Obviously I want the system to do a budget check here and stop the user at the time of service entry sheet. But this is not happening. The budget check is not happening at service entry sheet if I am having any unplanned services in the PR or if I tick the "unlimited" indicator against a particular service.
Hope I have put my point clearly.
regards
Pratap

Similar Messages

Internal Order Budget Check for PO with reference to PR / RFQ

Hi All,
I have a scenario where the budget availability control is not working for PO created with reference to PR or RFQ. While creating the PO if i modify the PO value more than RFQ or PR value then system is looking for budget control.
If we create a direct PO system is checking for Budget control where the PO value is more than availability budget.
We have the budget control check with internal order for services and non stock material based on substitution rule created for cost element group and cost center group.
In tolerance limits budget availability control we have not activated for PR, itu2019s activated from PO.
Kindly let me know what is the reason for budget availability control is not active where the PO is created with reference to PR or RFQ.
Thanks & Regards,
Rama Mohan

493900 - FAQ: Release Strategy:
It is not possible to create a purchase order if the referenced purchase requisition is not released. But the system allows you to put the purchase order on hold and then release the purchase requisition.
On the other hand you can create a purchase order with reference to an unreleased request of quotation.

Budget check for purchase order

Hi everyone!
We have NO problems with budget check for the SC. But when we create a PO and exceeds the budget no message are displayed. The only thing that happens is that the PO gets status "error in process". But if we change the PO (still exceeding budget) we receive a correct message. Is this a program error?
Sincerely
Anders

Hi
Temporarily deactivate budget check: SRM: using Badi
BBP_BUDGET_CHECK, AVC Backend customizing.
Did you do budget check while creating sc? what did it says?
Refere this old notes.
Note 740933 - Incorrct purchasing budget for currencies w/o decimal
places
Note 747143 - User purchasing budget in pop-up incorrectly formatted
regards
Muthu
Edited by: Muthuraman Govindasamy on Nov 5, 2008 3:08 PM

Windows Update failed to check for updates with error 0x800B0001

Hi all,
I have a WSUS installed on a Windows Server 2008 R2 box, I have a new Windows Server 2012 box (joined to domain) that cannot get updates from the WSUS, whenever I try to search for new updates I receive the following error in event viewer:
Windows Update failed to check for updates with error 0x800B0001
Note: I cannot see the Win2K12 server in the WSUS console under computers node.

I couldn't get it to run even after installing the mentioned KB fixes. So I investigated the error myself, and found a "hack" that seems to fix the issue. Wrote up a small piece on it here:
http://tplive.azurewebsites.net/2013/12/windows-update-error/
You and about a thousand other people have reported "I had already installed [the update], but installing it AGAIN fixed the problem.", which is almost assuredly a simple indication that the original installation of the update failed, and you simply did
not recognize that the installation of the update was not successful.
The fact that the /selfupdate folder was corrupted (read: missing files) pretty much says it all. There's no bug. Your installation of the update simply failed. (Or, the server wasn't healthy to begin with and you got what you got.)
Bottom line: The only known cause for a client-side 0x800B0001 error code is that the WSUS server has not been
properly and completely patched.
Lawrence Garvin, M.S., MCITP:EA, MCDBA, MCSA
SolarWinds Head Geek
Microsoft MVP - Software Packaging, Deployment & Servicing (2005-2013)
My MVP Profile: http://mvp.microsoft.com/en-us/mvp/Lawrence R Garvin
http://www.solarwinds.com/gotmicrosoft
The views expressed on this post are mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of SolarWinds.

Budget check at service entry sheet release in funds management

Dear Forum,
We implemented the funds management recently we have the requirement like below
Generally in FM at the time of service Purchase order creation system will consume the budget and at the time of service entry sheet release the consumed budget in the purchase order level will adjust. Now the business requirement is that they don’t want to check the budget at service purchase order level but they want budget check at service entry sheet level.
This is the case only for service PO’s.
If anyone have same scenario please share your views.
Regards,
Ravi.

Maybe you can try having the account assignment 'U' in the service PO which will then allow you only to enter the account assignment only in the service entry sheet for budget checking.

Budget check for PO based on delivery

Hi,
Can some guide how to configure budget check for purchase order based on supply schedule.
This could be that you have raised a Purchase order for 12 Quantity and the delivery of the same is at 1 per month for 12 months.Budget should be checked for one quantity for one month and not based on Purchase order which is for 12 quantity.
We are using Former budgeting.
Regards,
Gokul

Hi,
I'm afraid you will have to create 12 items within the same PO and assign different delivery date to every one of them; then, the budget will be affected accordingly.
Regards,
Eli

How to check for duplicates - with a twist?

As I'm importing music from my CD collection, is there a way to automatically check for duplicates - with an unusual twist?
I already imported about 70 CDs using AAC format.
I just bought a huge external drive specifically for storing my entire collection of CDs and LPs. Now that I have lots of space, I want to import everything in Apple Lossless format.
Is there an automatic (or at least painless) way to check for duplicates as I'm importing CDs, and to have the old AAC music files over written by the new Apple Lossless files?

Hi Clinto,
Do you see the column headers above in itunes? They say Title, Album, Artist, etc. I don't know if it's the same for MAC but in Windows, Right Click on the column headers and click "Kind". This will display the format each song is in. If your column headers already take up all of your screen, you're gonna have to uncheck one to make room for "kind".
Oh! and to overwrite existing files, make sure the ID3 tags are filled exactly to the old ones prior to ripping, though you don't need to fill all of them. I think you just fill the Artist, Album Artist, Album, and Title. A window will appear as you start to rip. It will ask if you want to overwrite the existing files, click "Yes". Again, don't know about Mac but it works this way in Windows.
Message was edited by: fullcream

I hv iPhone with ios 6.0.2 My iphone could not able to check for update-it's just showing "checking for updates" with loading sign How can I upgrade to ios 7? Help pls

I hv iPhone with ios 6.0.2
My iphone could not able to check for update…it’s just showing “checking for updates” with loading sign
How can I upgrade to ios 7?
Help pls

I agree- I apologize if I sounded skeptical and attacking. In no way did I mean it to sound that way.
I completely agree on the software-hardware combo issue- this is why apple killed off 1G and 2G devices- because newer software revisions would never ever run well if at all on such ancient devices. can you imagine running iOS 6 on an iPhone/iPod touch 1G? That would be terrible. Let alone iOS 3 runs terrible on them and now are generally rendered useless due to newer App Store requirements (most require 4.3+ now to allow apple to kill off the older devices). forcing newer software on older hardware (apple, dell, HP,... Anything electronic this definitely applies to) will almost always yield less-than-par results. The other part is apple forcing you to upgrade by means of intentially making things obsolete. all companies do that.
All of this factual info aside, the issue at hand with the 5 is not a software-hardware combo problem- those are most widely seen with the major revisions. then again, this isn't the first time apple has gotten caught up in battery drain snafus (even iOS 5 was plagued with this as well- and now there are some people desperate to roll back but can't). it basically waters it down to the point where keeping the stock software will always yield the best results even though newer versions provide better features- it all depends on whether or not the person deems the added features are worth a performance hit.
PS. I'm still at 100%- and I've been using it periodically throughout the day. your combo worked for you, but didn't for me. And may or may not work for others- As the tech world would say, mileage may vary.
PSS. What model/carrier do you have? Just wondering.

When I check for service and support coverage its show that my phone was replaced but i just bought it, is that means its used phone and sold as new one again?

when I check for service ans support coverage its show that my phone was replaced, but I just bought my iphone, is that means its used phone and sold as new one?

http://discussions.apple.com/message/21753467#21753467

No budget checking for batch input

Hi people
We are using the budget checking functions under Funds Mgmt (Former Budgeting) ECC6.0. Is there a way that we can exclude budget checking for postings done through batch input?
appreciate any help.
TQ
darth maut

Hi,
Please check the SAP note 573409
Regards,
Abhijit

Deliv. Indicator is not checked for PO with 0 qty

Hi
I am posting a goods receipt using FM BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE for a purchase order with a quantity of 0.
It is not setting the flag for
Deliv. Completed indicator(ELIKZ) in that purchase order. and that way the order is still open.
Do you have any idea what can be the problem ?
I have checked couple of SAP notes related to that like
515101
702839
775616
816691
823365
1017741
1058907
But system is already have those notes implemented
as it has higher support package.
Its SAP Retail system
with
SAP_APPL release 600 level 0012
EA-RETAIL release 600 level 0012
Any help will be appreciated.

Any Idea????

Budget checking for Purchase Order

Hello All Experts,
Project Availability control: Tolerance limits
on All activity groups - warning message for 101%
on Purchase requisition - warning message for 101%
on Purchase Order - error message for 101%
1. Now we created a project with 5000 budget and Availability control activated.
2. We assigned material to activity and created Purchase requisition for 6000. Here system issued message there is error in commitment and allowed us to save the project.
3. We created Purchase order for 6000, system is allowing to create, that is any thing less then PR value, even though it is more than 101% and suppose to give the error.
How do we over come this situation and make the system to look Budget value not the PR Value.
Thanks,
Karthik

Hi,
you have maintained activity groups ++ so system is considering All activity groups first for budget check instead of individual activity groups(PR,PO...). remove the ++ activity group and maintain individually(PR,PO,GI...) and check.
regards

Gateway service with multiple entity sets

Hi,
I have designed a Gateway service with 3 entities, and 3 entity sets.Entity sets are not related one to another. This entity sets correspond to static data stored in 3 different custom table in SAP. The aim of this service is to provide static data (but customizable on the backend) for drop down lists on a SAP UI5 application consuming Gateway services.
I am wondering if it is possible through a single read operation, to retrieve all entity sets. Since the service URL to get data related to one entity set is /sap/opu/odata/sap/ZTEST_SERVICE_SRV/EntitySet, how should I process if I want to retrieve all 3 entity sets ? Is it something possible or do we have to call each entity set at once ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Thibault

Hi Krishna,
I'd try and avoid a construct like this because I don't think it's very compliant or discoverable - you have to know how to access it. That's maybe acceptable for "internal" services, but really, we should try and use the protocol instead of introducing so many workarounds.
It seems that the simplicity of OData on some levels makes people think they have got the wrong answer. It can get complex but something like a value list is pretty basic and shouldn't be subject to loads of different interpretations.
Batching GET's on the entities or using a grouping entity as per Andre's suggestion is what I'd be thinking of doing. I know that the former is used by some Fiori applications.
Regards
Ron.

Change account assignment category for services with ME22N

Dear guru ,
i have created a purchase order for a position with item category D(service) and account assignment category K(cost centre). I have inserted for the accounting view the cost center.
After the saving If I a try to change the purchase order position with ME22N the system donu2019t allow to change the account assignment category (F order instead of K).
I have verified that for other positions with account assignment category K(cost centre) but for Item category blank(standard) the system allow to change the account assignment category if not exist goods receipt or invoice.
Whatu2019s the problem about services ?
Thanks

Hi,
Usually the Account assigned PO's are fixed with Account assignment, you cann't modify the account assignment once it is saved.
It depends on the IMG settings for Account assignment category.
Check the following IMG Settings
SPROMMPurchasingAccount assignment-Maintain account assignment categories
Here check for "K" --Costcentre in the detailed information if the checkbox at Acct assignment changable then only you can modify the Account assignment category modification in PO, otherwise not possible.
rgds
gsc

Reduce Remaining Order Planned value for services with PO

Hi guys,
I'am looking for a way to reduce the remaining or residual order plan value for a network activity with services where the amount on the PO is below the planned value. If for example the planned value amounts up to 1000 and the PO has been reduced due to negotiations to 900, a remainder order plan of 100 remains on the network activity till the activity is technically closed.
Is there a way to reduce the ROP when a PO exists for the network activity?
Thanks, Geert

We are combining an early visibility of all costs and a strict budget availability control with a formal procedure for project managers to request additional budget.
We have more and more projects where a part of the budget remains blocked in ROP for service activities because the planned value was more pessimistic than the real PO amount. Since these service activities are typically executed at the end of the project that part remains blocked. Of course the project managers want to use that marging elsewhere without having to pass a request for additional budget.
We have no issue with the network activity planned costs remaining visible, we just want the ROP to be 0 when a the purchase requisition for the service activity has been transformed into a purchase order. In the above example 100 of the budget would be freed for other use.

Budget checking for services with "Unlilmited" indicator set

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for