Budget Request with Approval SR62

Did anyone use this functionality -Budget Request with Approval SR62?
Edited by: psconsultant on Mar 24, 2011 2:12 PM

Hi,
Pls go through link, it seems its a feature of intranet portal
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_ppm50/helpdata/en/f2/05603815ba682ce10000009b38f842/content.htm
To my knowledge you cant have budget approval process in standard SAP, unless you use Appropriation Requests (under Investment management) for budget request
Regards,
SL
Edited by: sam Lesha on Mar 25, 2011 7:29 AM

Similar Messages

Request with approver decided at runtime

Hi All,
is it possible to create a request where the approver is not known until the requested role or resource is selected?
for example a lookup table would contain roles or resources with the userid of the appover.
it does not matter if its the request level or operational.
Thanx.

I think this will do
http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/fmw/oim/oim_11g/developing_oim_custom_approval_process_for_role_request/developing_oim_custom_approval_process_for_role_request.pdf

Purchase request with Approve, Not applicable status

Question,
I try to use Service procurement to create contractor PR. All the approver have approved it but the status still show as Approved, Not applicable and I cannot assign contractor from HR to this in the crontroctar tab.
Any clue?

hi iswari
you can acheieve this prodided you have maintained the corresponding currencny in the Schedulling agreement, kinldy maintain the curren in ME32k and assing the agreement while converting purchase requisition to purchase order .Since you are creating the order the price will be in the currency you have maintained in customizing.
youcan also enter the price in MO, just double click the operation and in external tab page select the FULL SERVICE button in the bottom of the screen, anew screeen will appear where you will enter the overall limit and expected value
regards
thyagarajan

How to approve marketing budget request

Hey Guys,
I am very new to siebel world.I have created a Marketing Plan with status APPROVED,its approval sent to EHOLDEN,but when I tried to login through the same it says its responsibility doesnot allow to view the home page.Same is the case for budget request for the same plan.
Please Help!
Thanks in advance

Hi
Have you setup Department Approvers?
By design, eAM Work Request would be routed to Department approver (Department is populated on Work Request).
Do let me know if you need further information.
Regards
Kamal

Issues with Approval Task IN IDM 7.1

Hi,
I have been facing issues with Approval task.
Firstly,
I have created an Approval task with 'Mskeyvalue' and 'Mxref_mx_privilege' as attributes.
I am having a problem in the Approvers workflow UI where, we see these approvals.
It not only displays the requested privilege,but also the already provisioned privileges of the enduser to the approver.
He will not be able to recognize which privilege has been requested.
Is this an already known issue which has been sorted out in recently updated patches?
If not can you suggest me a solution for this.
Secondly,
The privilege requested by the end-user is getting provisioned to the backend,even before it is Approved.
Since Provisioning tasks are mapped through repository,privileges are getting provisioned as soon as
an entry is made into the Identity Stores.
But,Ideally the requested privilege should not be proviosioned to the backend until it is approved by the Approver.
Is this an already known isuue which has been sorted out in recently updated patches?
If not can you suggest me a solution for this.
Thanks and Regards,
Joel
Edited by: Joel Sundararajan Davis on Jul 16, 2009 11:04 AM

Joel,
I'm afraid the approval process is not quite this simple. You are correct, if you have provisioning setup on the repository for a privilege it will be assigned immediately. The approval task as you are using it works as an 'interrupt' to a process - nothing more.
There is an entry type called pending value that you would need to leverage in order to have privileges requested route for approval. This pending value object is created by default for role requests in 7.1, but I'm not sure how to create a pending value for a privilege.
Which brings to mind a question - is there a reason you want users to request privileges instead of roles? In general I think the security model is setup so that users are assigned roles which contain one or more privileges.
If you do choose to use a role instead of privilege, simply set the attribute MX_APPROVAL_TASK to the id of the approval task you want to use and the system will do the rest. The display you referenced in the first part of your question will always display the current values of the attributes you select for the user, so don't try to display the roles there - just display the user id, name, whatever else is helpful and when the approver clicks on the user id they will get the approval details which will include the requested role.
Also, please note that if you would like to assign a role directly anywhere (bypass approvals) you can use the switch: {direct_reference=1}
-Geoff

OIM 9.1.0.1 :- Create User Operation with Approval.

Guru/Experts,
I am currently using OIM 9.1.0.1 , and i want create user functionality to be work with approval. Whenvr a user Or xelsysadm tries to create user then its should ask for approve/Rejact then only it will create or reject the operation.
Thanks,
Hemant.

user8995781,
Thanks for your reply , but i am not able to create a user. I am getting illegalArgumentException. My Approval process is triggering properly but i am not able to see provision process triggering properly.
Please find below log :-
13:24:07,457 INFO [PropertyMessageResources] Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.taglib.html.LocalStrings', returnNull=true
13:24:07,478 INFO [PropertyMessageResources] Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.taglib.html.LocalStrings', returnNull=true
13:24:07,481 INFO [PropertyMessageResources] Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.taglib.html.LocalStrings', returnNull=true
13:24:07,616 INFO [PropertyMessageResources] Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.taglib.html.LocalStrings', returnNull=true
13:24:09,285 INFO [PropertyMessageResources] Initializing, config='org.apache.struts.taglib.html.LocalStrings', returnNull=true
13:26:09,387 ERROR [REQUESTS] Class/Method: tcRequestOperationsBean/getRequestDetail encounter some problems: Error while executing query to get request information.
13:26:09,388 ERROR [REQUESTS] Class/Method: tcRequestOperationsBean/getRequestDetail encounter some problems: {1}
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException
at java.sql.Date.valueOf(Date.java:138)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beansimpl.tcRequestOperationsBean.getRequestDetail(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.ejb.beans.tcRequestOperationsSession.getRequestDetail(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.invocation.Invocation.performCall(Invocation.java:359)
at org.jboss.ejb.StatelessSessionContainer$ContainerInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionContainer.java:237)
at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInterceptor.invoke(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:158)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInstanceInterceptor.java:169)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.CallValidationInterceptor.invoke(CallValidationInterceptor.java:63)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:121)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:350)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invoke(TxInterceptorCMT.java:181)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:168)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.LogInterceptor.invoke(LogInterceptor.java:205)
at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.invoke(ProxyFactoryFinderInterceptor.java:138)
at org.jboss.ejb.SessionContainer.internalInvoke(SessionContainer.java:648)
at org.jboss.ejb.Container.invoke(Container.java:960)
at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor134.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
at org.jboss.invocation.local.LocalInvoker$MBeanServerAction.invoke(LocalInvoker.java:169)
at org.jboss.invocation.local.LocalInvoker.invoke(LocalInvoker.java:118)
at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invokeLocal(InvokerInterceptor.java:209)
at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.java:195)
at org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:61)
at org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:70)
at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.StatelessSessionInterceptor.invoke(StatelessSessionInterceptor.java:112)
at org.jboss.proxy.ClientContainer.invoke(ClientContainer.java:100)
at $Proxy767.getRequestDetail(Unknown Source)
at Thor.API.Operations.tcRequestOperationsClient.getRequestDetail(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler$1.run(Unknown Source)
at Thor.API.Security.LoginHandler.jbossLoginSession.runAs(Unknown Source)
at Thor.API.Base.SecurityInvocationHandler.invoke(Unknown Source)
at $Proxy786.getRequestDetail(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.RequestAction.setPendingTask(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.RequestAction.requestDetail(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.apache.struts.actions.DispatchAction.dispatchMethod(DispatchAction.java:280)
at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcLookupDispatchAction.execute(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcActionBase.execute(Unknown Source)
at com.thortech.xl.webclient.actions.tcAction.execute(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform(RequestProcessor.java:484)
at org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process(RequestProcessor.java:274)
at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process(ActionServlet.java:1482)
at org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost(ActionServlet.java:525)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:710)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:803)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:290)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at com.thortech.xl.webclient.security.SecurityFilter.doFilter(Unknown Source)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.jboss.web.tomcat.filters.ReplyHeaderFilter.doFilter(ReplyHeaderFilter.java:96)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:235)
at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:230)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:175)
at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.SecurityAssociationValve.invoke(SecurityAssociationValve.java:182)
at org.jboss.web.tomcat.security.JaccContextValve.invoke(JaccContextValve.java:84)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127)
at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:102)
at org.jboss.web.tomcat.service.jca.CachedConnectionValve.invoke(CachedConnectionValve.java:157)
at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:109)
at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:262)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:844)
at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11Protocol.java:583)
at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.JIoEndpoint$Worker.run(JIoEndpoint.java:446)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
Thanks,
Hemant.

Report on Leave request (with HTML ) using ITS version

we are using ITS version of ESS and MSS version EP 6.0 and SAP R/3 5.0.
Our client wants a report on Leave Request(with HTML). the worflow used is WS20000081. my question is there any standard report to check the Leave Request which are approved or rejected. In SAP there is one standard report
RPTARQDBVIEW where in when we execute no output exists.
Please help me whether is there any report to view the leave requests.
Regards
Santosh Ghanwar

Dear Claude;
Thanks for your kind assistance... I was out for sometime & got up in some other urgent tasks...
Sorry for delay...
I had created the loop Payroll? with following conditions
&Employee.ControlRecordState&     =          1     or
&Employee.ControlRecordState&     =           2     or
&Employee.ControlRecordState&   =          3     or
&Employee.ControlRecordDate&     <           %Current Date%
but result is always "True"
Please help me out...
Best Regards,

Problem with approving standard workflows.

We are testing workflows in Content DB prior to initiating a larger project. We have defined a serial approval workflow for uploading a file to a folder. When a file is uploaded, the approver can see the request but is not given the possibility to approve or reject the request.
The approver has been granted "approval" role with standard permissions "Set Attributes, Set Metadata, Discover, Lock, Get Metadata, Get Content, Set Content, Copy".
What can be missing in our setup that blocks for approving in workflows?

A few things to check:
1) That a message appears (briefly) on the outbound advanced queue (IFS_OUT) when the workflow is triggered. You can perform a "select * from ifs_out_table;" You need to be quick though.
However, if there is a build up of messages on the queue, but none are being removed, it would appear the Oracle Workflow process is not running.
2) If the message appears on the queue (briefly), then disappears, workflow is correctly dequeing the message.
In order for the approve/reject buttons to become visible in the Content DB Web UI, Oracle Workflow must repond on the inbound queue (IFS_IN) with seperate "notification" messages for each of the applicable responders.
If "orcladmin" was a responder for the worflow, a queue message may look like :-
IFS Queue Message Details:
Message Type: IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_NID
IFS Queue Message Parameters:
IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_PROCESSID=48799 (STRING)
IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_RESPONDER=ORCLADMIN (STRING)
IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_NID=3 (STRING)
You will thus need to monitor the inbound queue table (IFS_IN_TABLE) - and see if Worflow is responding to the request with these responder notifications.
If workflow is not returning notifications for each responder of the original request, then the Workflow process has failed / or is not running. You will need to check with the Oracle Workflow guys on how to debug workflow further.
If however, the notification messages are on the IFS_IN queue, but are not being removed, it means the Content DB agent responsible for processing inbound queue messages is not running.
The agent responsible for this is the InboundQueueListenerAgent. Check the Content DB node log file and search for entries relating to oracle.ifs.management.servers.InboundQueueListenerAgent
You will notice a table in the Content DB schema named odm_responder
SQL> desc odm_responder;
Name Null? Type
ID NOT NULL NUMBER(20)
REQUEST NUMBER(20)
RESPONDERUSER NUMBER(20)
RESPONSE NUMBER(1)
RESPONSEDATE NUMBER(20)
NOTIFICATIONID NUMBER(20)
For a particular responder to see approve/reject buttons for a particular request, I believe the notificationid value has to be non-null.
BTW - the message on the IFS_OUT queue will look something like :-
Q_NAME MSGID
CORRID
PRIORITY STATE
DELAY
EXPIRATION
TIME_MANAGER_INFO
LOCAL_ORDER_NO CHAIN_NO CSCN DSCN
ENQ_TIME
ENQ_UID ENQ_TID
DEQ_TIME
DEQ_UID DEQ_TID RETRY_COUNT
EXCEPTION_QSCHEMA EXCEPTION_QUEUE STEP_NO
RECIPIENT_KEY DEQUEUE_MSGID SENDER_NAME
SENDER_ADDRESS
SENDER_PROTOCOL
USER_DATA(MESSAGETYPE, PARAMETERLIST(NAME, VALUE, DATATYPE))
USER_PROP()
IFS_OUT 37A0E24085DB24DCE040BB0AC8417ABA
1 0
0 0 0 0
16/AUG/07 04:48:32.357811 PM
65 9.21.1157
0
0
0
IFSQUEUEMESSAGE('START_STANDARD_WORKFLOW', PARAMETERS(
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_MINYESVOTES', '1', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_APPROVE_MSG', 'Choose Yes to Approve the request.', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_MESSAGE_SUBJECT', 'CreateWorkspace Request 43436 submitted in Content Services', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_REJECT_MSG', 'Choose No to Reject the request.', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_OWNER', 'ASLAM', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_MESSAGE_HEADER', 'A CreateWorkspace Request has been submitted in Content Services. You are...', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_REQUEST_TIMEOUT', '14', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_JUSTIFICATION', 'please approve', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_REQUESTID', '43436', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_AGENT_BASED_REQUEST', 'N', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_RESPONDERS', 'ASLAM CONTENTADMIN ORCLADMIN', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_MINNOVOTES', '1', 'STRING'),
IFSQUEUEMESSAGEPARAMETER('IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_PROCESSID', '43446', 'STRING')))
Workflow must return a notification id message for each person listed in the IFS_ECM_WORKFLOW_RESPONDERS queue parameter.
in the case above, the requesters are "ASLAM, CONTENTADMIN, ORCLADMIN"
Using the request id from above ..
SQL> select responderuser from content.odmv_responder where request = 43436;
RESPONDERUSER
38503
...etc
select name from odmv_publicobject where id = 38503
NAME
orcladmin
select notificationid from content.odmv_responder where request = 43591;
NOTIFICATIONID
notice the notificationid is NULL - meaning approve/reject buttons would not be visible
cheers
Matt.

CUP 5.3: Mitigating from Request and approval of new created control

Hi,
I have activated in RAR that new created controls need to be approved and this works fine when creating the control in RAR.
when creating the mitigating control from CUP within the request with the "Mitigate"-button the control is created directly in RAR without starting the approval workflow the new controls.
Is this a bug or do I need to configured somewhere that the workflow should be also triggered when a control is created via CUP?
Best regards
Marco

Hi Marco,
I know this is an important functionality but it is not available in CUP as of now. Some of my customers are looking for this. You should open an enhancement request for this. I have also encouraged my clients to open an enhancement request for this. I am hoping SAP fixes this ASAP.
Regards,
Alpesh

Post budget document from approved pre-posted budget document workflow

Hi,
We are using budget version "0" for AVC Check and "1" for provision budget used for sending further approvals.
I am uploading provisional budget i.e Pre-posted budget with version "1" and sending two levels for approvals by using SAP Standard workflow.
If pre-posted budget document approved by 2 levels, what is impact on budget posted document?
a) Will Pre-posted approved document be convert into Actual budget document with Version "0" (or)
b) Will Pre-posted document remain same by updating status with "approved", there by User again needs to post actual budget document with Version "0" by using "FMBB"
Please help me
Regards
Sam

CA Sam,
The Pre-posted document will remain the same i.e.approved version 1. In order to create version 0 you can copy from version to version.
Thanks
Shyam

Online purchase request(PR) approval application using Blackberry.

Hi,
We are having ECC6.0 ABAP stack and have to implement Online purchase request(PR) approval application using Blackberry.
Please provide related information.
With Request,
Krishna.

Hi Venkat
below links will help you regarding your quarry
http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp
Regards
Bandla

Self registration with Approval

Hi,
I need to understand how this self registration with approval works. What we need in something on these lines
user self registers -> approver approves -> user gets access to portal
Can i create a user without any role assigned the him and when the approver approves, automatically some pre-designated role gets assgined to the user? I want my approver to just click on approve YES and not actually get into UME stuff.
Please help
-Alpana

Thanks for the reply Michael.
Yes, i have already gone thru company based self registration. But it does not specify the role assignment part :(. What i read was ok ... you register then u get assigned to the portal as guest user and then if approver approves the request the user becomes a COMPANY user. But then when the approver approves the request, does he assign the company related roles to the user? Or can that be coded somewhere?
Please help.
-Regards,
Alpana

Self registration request and approval process

We are looking to implement self-registration with a bit of workflow when we move to Portal 10.1.2 A system where a user requests access, their request is approved (or denied) by another person and then an account is created with appropiate permissions.
We are currently using an Excel spreadsheet e-mailed back and forth, we have begun designing the process with standard forms and reports in it's own schma, but the last piece will still need to be manual (creating the account).
Does anybody know of a way to automate this process of account creation?
Does Application Server 10.1.2 self-registration have similar capabilities? if so, where could I look to learn what it can do?
Thanxs,
ljalg

refer this.
Configuring Auto-Approval for Self-Registration - Fails due to Organisation

User change attribute workflow with approval problem

Hello,
I have a requirement to add account numbers to user entry through workflow with approval process. and also same user can have multiple account numbers. when approver approves the User request then it's account number will be added into the user entity in ldap.
So, i have created a Change Attribute workflow for that account number with these steps as : initiate, Approval, Commit, Error_report
this workflow i am able to invoke through IdentityXML call and from OIM interfaces approvers able to approve and that account number is persisting under the User entity.
Problem is: Actually above request is staging system. when user requests, it is in initiate step, when approver approves the request then only commits the info. so, there are 2 stages here.
When i am requesting two consecutive account number requests then both requests are in initial stage. Then approver approves the 1st request then it is persisting into User entity. after that approver approves the 2nd request then this account number is overwriting the previous one. so, here is the problem i am finding. worflow is not adding the new account number.. instead its replacing the last value in the list of account numbers for an User entity.
I hope the above problem make understandable..
Really its a very much helpful to find the solution on this.
Thanks in advance,
Srini.

Thanks for the help. Having reinstalled OID/OAM a bunch of times to properly add our custom user object, nothing seems absurd. I tried running through your steps, but I'm still not getting the workflow button. I've customized create and delete workflows properly, but the change attribute is a mystery.
I did the following:
1) Selected a custom attribute in Attribute Access Control
2) Changed its read access to Anyone
3) Saved
4) Changed its modify access to Anyone
5) Saved
6) Added a new Change Attribute workflow for the custom attribute
7) Action #1: Request, added Anyone as participant and saved
8) Action #2: External Action, selected attribute is the custom one
9) Action #3: Commit
10) Saved and enabled the workflow
11) Restarted the Identity server
12) Picked a user
13) Opened his user profile
14) Clicked Modify
The custom attribute is still editable and has no Request a Change button.

GRC 10 Access request with 'System entry only' goes to escape route

Hello All Experts,
I am facing same issue but scenario is different which I found not possible with above solution. If I am submitting request with ONLY system, then request will go to AUTO approve and end.
1) In change authorizations option, end user submits request with only filling SYSTEM option.
2) Request goes to 1st Stage people, who will add roles into system
Existing MSMP no roleowner is used as routing condition here, if role approver not FOUND, request takes ESCAPE ROUTE and goes to Escape Stage with system option and role(if not defined role owner for it)
3) If role has owner, it goes to Role Owner.
Can we remove SYSTEM option from request and send it to NO PATH stage instead of ESCAPE route
OR
Is there any better way to handle this? client do not wants to APPROVE requests with SYSTEM entries but ready to handle requests with no role owner request.
Please help.. **Urgent**

1. Look at the following link and ensure you have a similar Initiator created and applied in MSMP.
GRC Request with both System and Role Line Items
2. Ensure in MSMP you have "no stages" in the path for "system only" requests. Paths with no stages will work on roughly SP10 onwards (from experience).

Budget Request with Approval SR62

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for