Budget Supplement on WBS based on AuC

Hi all !
I'm trying to use CJ37 [Supplement Budget] for a WBS element...
It appears this message "Overall budget and/or annual budget cannot be processed"...
When I go to CJ20n tcode,
Edit > WBS Element > Investment Programs -> Investment Program, in order to assign the WBS to a Invest. Prog., it appears a message "WBS superior element is account assignment element"
Actually, this WBS Invest. Program. is based on AuC (Asset Under Construction).
The question is: how can I supplement budget for this project/WBS element provided that it's not related to a prog. invest. position?
Thanks for help,
Evandro Neves.

Sreekanth,
The targeted project is unlocked, but there are many other projects which are locked (log list bellow)... As a result, I can't split my budget to the superior investment program positions...
Typ Message text
System status LKD is active (WBS PI/3010.10/007)
    System status BMLK is active (WBS PI/3010.10/007)
    System status LKD is active (WBS PI/3040.10/001)
    System status BMLK is active (WBS PI/3040.10/001)
    System status LKD is active (WBS PI/3040.10/007)
    System status BMLK is active (WBS PI/3040.10/007)
    System status LKD is active (WBS PI/3600.10/002)
    System status CLSD is active (WBS PI/3600.10/002)
    System status BMLK is active (WBS PI/3600.10/002)
    System status LKD is active (WBS PI/3010.10/011)
    System status BMLK is active (WBS PI/3010.10/011)
    System status LKD is active (WBS PI/3010.10/012)
    System status BMLK is active (WBS PI/3010.10/012)
    System status LKD is active (WBS PI/3010.10/013)
Thanks in advance,
Evandro Neves.

Similar Messages

WBS settlement to AUC - use original cost elements?

Hello gurus
We have an allocation structure which settles project WBS costs to AUC.
The issue is that it is using a single settlement cost element for all the costs going to the AUC.
I notice there is a tick box 'by cost element' in the 'Allocation structure:settlement cost elements' entry for FXA.
What is the result of using this tick box?
We would like the original cost elements in the WBS to be credited rather than the single one.
Is this possible?
Thanks everyone

Hi
- we do not have secondary cost elements posted
- we do not use budget checking
As I said, we would like the original cost elements against the WBS to be credited. The single one is causing problems because it posts in total to 55291 (as in the configuration) which does not reconcile back to the many cost elements posted to the WBS.
Is this possible?
What is the effect of the check box 'by cost element' as we do not understand the help text on this checkbox field and are not sure if this could solve the problem (or there is a downside to using this). If this is not possible we would like to know as well.
Thanks all

WBS settlement wiht AUC

Hello,
Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Lakshmi.

Hi,
Please follow above mentioned points
Allocation structure added settlement with FXA. -- Path - SPRO - IMG - Investment Management - Projects as Investment Measures - Settlement -- Maintain Allocation Structures -create on Allocation structure - and assignment - 010 -- Material & service cost -- and select - click on - source - give Cost elements - from - to
and click on settlement cost element - give receiver category -- FXA - check box for By cost element -- and save it ,
2.Maintain Settlement Profiles -- Define Settlement Profile -- XX - WBSE Settlement Profile
    select radio button - to be settled in full , give allocated structure ,
     Default object type FXA Asset
     select all indicators -- and give other parameter -- Document type -- AA or as per requirement
     and Assign Settlement Profile to Project Profile
3.New Asset class creation with line items settlement     --   Investment Management -- Projects as Investment Measures -- Master Data --Assets under Construction --Define Asset Classes ==
      give- Account determination -- asset class , scr layout rule -- capital investment measure ,
give number range --whichever is created
status of AuC -- select radio button -- Investment Measure
Save it ,
Now you can create Project -   Run -- CJ88 for settlement
Thanking you
Regards
Mahesh

WBS settlement with AUC

Hello,
Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Lakshmi.

Hi Lakshmi,
There are quite a few settings to be maintained. I do not remember exact sequence of steps but here are a few pointers.
1. Investment profile needs to be created with 'line item settlement'
2. AUC asset class to be created and assigned to this investment profile
3. Investment profile to be linked to project profile.
4. Source structure to be assigned to investment profile
There may be other steps I am missing but I hope these help.
Also, if you mention any error that you are facing or at which point you are getting stuck, it would be helpful.
Regards

Tables for budget supplement,return and transfer

Dear PS experts,
Would appreciate if you could help me to identify which table should i use to capture/calculate project budget supplement, return and transfer.
Thanks in advance!
Best regards,
Eila

Pass Objr of WBS to this tables
BPEG Budget revision header
BPEJ Budget revision header
BPGE Overall/annual budget
BPJA Overall/annual budget
Regards
Nitin

Budget Supplement

Dear All,
I have this typical problem in budget supplement
Now suppose the top WBS budget is 300/-, and first level budget is 200/-
and against the budget of 200/- I have posted actual(assigned) values of 150/-
Now i want to change the first level WBS budget to 150/-
I tried to subtract 50/- from both first level and top level WBS
but got error, saying the budget is exhausted.
Availability Control is active for the Projects.
Regards,
Vikas Sharma

Hi,
Return the Budget of rs 50 from CJ35 from the WBS with Budget 200 only.
no goto CJ30 goto menu Edit>Select>Select all and Edit--> totalup.
Normaly when you total up the budget it will consider bottom up budgetting.
In normal scenario when ever you assgin the budget at top level as well as bottom level WBS, always try to supplement the budget to the top level. there are more chances of system using bottom up budgeting and the value at top level changes.
i hope you got the answer..!
Rgds
Sudhir reddy

Budget Supplement and Planning Supplement

Hi All,
Is there any planning supplement in PS or Investment management?
As far as i know there is a tcode for budget supplement. But how can i put supplement in planning?
Plz advice.
Cheers,
Nies

HI,
I run tcode CJR2 (1-701 - Cost element Planning) .
Version 0
Period 3 to 3
I put WBS group and cost element.
Then i click the cost element and go to detail planning, i put material, quantity ..etc...i save and post the quantity.
After that i run again CJR2 , put the same WBSE and Cost element. Why now i cannot put another material since the field have the color grey ? How can i put another material / or put another plan value?
Plz help...
Cheers,
Nies

IM-PS top WBS settle to AUC

Dear all experts,
could you help me on the following issue?
i am working on a capital project. IM and PS modules are used.
my key users want to settle lower WBS to the superior WBS and the top WBS to one AUC when they do the monthly settlement.
i delete the IM profile in the lower WBS, and maintain the settlement rule of them.
when i do the settle i found that lower WBS settle to the superior WBS but the top WBS doesn't settle to AUC
could you tell me what's the problem.
Judy

sorry, i didn't mean to close the question, as the problem is still there.
here is what i am.
AUC is created automatically when i release the project.
if i didn't delete the IM profile, all the WBS including the top one will be settled to AUC individually.
but if i delete the IM profile of lower WBS and maintain the settlement rule manually, the lower WBS will be settled to the top WBS. but the top one will not be settled to AUC that is created automatically.
the settlement type is not AUC,but GES.
i don't think it is correct.
could someone offer me some help or suggestions?
did someone meet the same problem?
thanks in advance.
Judy

Pruchase order in MM don't consume budget in the WBS

Hi fiends,
We are doing implementation for Public Sector with EA-PS, MM and PS (ECC 6.0).
We are having problems in the control availability or commitments of the WBS: duplication of the commitments in WPS:
- In EA-PS create a Funds Commitment (FMZ1) : 10u20AC
- In MM create a Purchase order: 10 u20AC
In our model the committed should be 10 u20AC instead of 20 u20AC.
We need that the Pruchase order don't consume budget in the WBS.
Is there any way of doing these operations?
Thanks in advance.
Carlos.

Hi,
In std SAP commitment is created after creating a PR or a PO against the project.so you need to look how to prevent the this.
Wait may be expert will advice you regarding this otherwise you can send request to SAP directly about the requirement they can give you the solution,
Regards,
Muzamil

Budget Supplement using Appropriation Request.

Dear Friends,
As per our business scenario, we have to create project thru Appropriation Request. In case the budget needs Supplement, that same is also needs to be mapped using Appropriation Request.
The system is restricting creation of further ARs for WBSE once it is assigned to IM Position.
Technically, system dose not seem to have provision of budget supplement to an already assigned project (to IM Position) using Appropriation Request.
My Question: Is there any setting or Workaround thru which we can Use Appropriation Requests to request for Budget Supplements for a Project thats already assigned to an IM Postion( after replacing Initial AR). ?
Regards,
Seemant

I feel that after replacing AR , as your project is assigned to IM postion. you can distribute the budget to project by IM postion only via IM52.
Because AR is made for management of the planning and approval phase of investments and other types of measures
And IMProgram & postion is made for cyclical planning and management of investment budgets for a number of measures, throughout your whole enterprise
If you knew that you want extra budget you can take care the same via planning additional cost on AR.
If IM Postion itself is not having sufficient budget than you can supplement there as well via IM32.
please refer this link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/2a/f9f405493111d182b70000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regards
Nitin

How to find Annual Budget for a WBS element ?

Hi All ,
Is there any way by which i can find the annual budget for a WBS element ?
I have been working on this for a long time , but couldnt get the answer .
So getting back to this place .
Thanks in advance .
Regards,
Ambar .

Hi,
This link may help you.
how to get the budget amt and commited amt and available amt?
Regards,
Shamma

Step By step Procedure to control Pm orders Budget by using Wbs element

HI,
we need step by step procedure to control PM orders Budget By using WBS Element, step by step means
1. how to create wbs element
2 how to assign budget to wbs element
3 how to control this budget through orders
Regards
Ganesh

Hi,
Please verify this link:
http://www.sap-img.com/ps006.htm
Regards
Keerthi

BAPI to assign budget to a WBS element.

hi,
I need to find BAPI to assign budget to a WBS element in a project.
The transaction to do this is CJ30.
Its imp...
Please help..
Thanks & Regards
Shabari

Look at BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
rgd
Frédéric
(next time search the BAPI with transaction BAPI or in ifr.sap.com)

How to identify WBS elements with AuC status

Hello Experts,
We had earlier developed a report which determines whether the entered project id can be set to CLSD status or not. The problem arises with few WBS elements which have AuC statuses. The report is displaying them as closeable but we fail to close them through CJ20N. The problem is that the program captures the status of some projects as TECO but these projects have WBS elements which have statuses like "TECO BUDG AUC SETCu201D because of which the system doesnu2019t allow CJ20N to close it. So can any one help me suggest any means by which we can detect whether any of a projects WBS elements are in the AUC status?
Regards,
Uday

Hi Virendra,
Thanks a lot for your inputs. I was trying to go through the tables in detail before I again get back to you about anything. From TJ02 I got to know that I0163 is the status code for Asset in construction costs. So I obtained the OBJNR values of all my WBS elements and I went through all the 3 tables TJ02, JCDS & JSTO that you had suggested. The data in JEST for 1 of the OBJNR values contained this I0163 value in 1 row. I wasn't however sure as to which particular status we could consider for the WBS from among the list. Is it something like the last row of the table would be the current status of the element & that all the other statuses just point to the various history of changes that it went through? (Am mailing you a copy of the same thread so that you would get the data displayed in a proper tabular format.)
Regards,
Uday
MANDT   OBJNR              STAT    INACT    CHGNR
400         PR00304257       I0001      X           002
400         PR00304257       I0002      X           004
400         PR00304257       I0005      X           001
400         PR00304257       I0028                   001
400         PR00304257       I0045                   003
400         PR00304257       I0064      X           002
400         PR00304257       I0067                   001
400         PR00304257       I0163                   001

Asset budgeting through Statistical WBS

Dear Experts,
I have configured and assigned Statistical WBS to Asset to carry out active budgeting. To my knowledge I have configured all relevant configuration but when I create PR over this Asset, WBS field is not updated in the PR and therefore no commitment / budget check is performed.
However, in this same scenario I created internal order and assigned it to WBS. Here then I assigned the Internal Order to the Asset. Budget check in this case runs fine.
As you may see from figure above B-OA01-001-001 is assigned to an Internal Order where it correctly carry out commitment / budget check when I create PR against Asset with Internal Order as Investment Account Assignment. Also it displays Internal Order number along with Asset number in PR account assignment tab.
But when I assign WBS directly to an Asset in origin tab of Asset Master no budget check is carried out while creating PR. Also WBS field is also not updated in PR account assignment tab with Asset.
Note: Budget in both cases is assigned to WBS element.
Regards,
Saif

Salaam Saif!!
You need to do settings in T code ACSET... You must assign WBS Element in ACSET against APC postings
Refer below
Incase you dont find these in dropdown list in ACSET, activate them in ORFA > Integration with the General Ledger> Additional Account Assignment Objects > Activate Account Assignment Objects
Br. Ajay M

Budget Supplement on WBS based on AuC

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for