Buffalo AirStation WLI-CBG54HP High Power Wireless CardBus in G3 Powerbook

Hi,
I have a G3 Powerbook (Pismo) and I’m running OSX 3.9 and have installed airport 4.1.
I want to get a wireless internet connection for this machine in the form of a PCMCIA card and one that will work with airport.
I’ve searched through some of the previous posts and found lots of relevant info (thanks to all concerned)
A number of posts suggest that the Buffalo Airstation WLI-CB-G54 works ok with this setup but I would like to know if anybody has any experience with the newer high powered version (WLI-CB-G54HP) and is there any reason to think that this one will not work when the standard one does or should they essentially be the same card?
If anyone can help me out here i’d be very grateful.
Barry
PowerBook G3500mhz   Mac OS X (10.3.9)  

The list referenced above does not reference the card in discussion...the HP variety.
I have just put a WLI-CB-G54HP into my G4 portable (fully updated 10.4.6), and I can tell you that there is no joy. There is no LED, though the card icon pops up on the toolbar above, and it has "Power Off Card" in black, the card stays cool and doesn't appear to be on at all. "Unknown Vendor" and "Access Control" are both gray'd out.
I just checked and the card also doesn't do anything but pop up the icon in my G3 (Pismo? Brown keys...firewire) running OSX Server 10.4.6.
I have used several earlier versions of this card which always worked the instant they were popped in. I have sold many of them to other happy users since they have a hole in the back for an external antenna...a great feature. I have also plugged in the Buffalo USB Wireless device and it doesn't do a thing either.
I expect that we still need to learn the reality of the chip manufacturer.
Meanwhile, the wifi to ethernet converter and router seem to work superbly.
internetmarine
Powerbook   Mac OS X (10.4.6)  

Similar Messages

  • How to use a high power wireless-n usb adapter

    I recently purchased a kinamax high power wireless-n USB 2.0 adapter to boost my wifi signal. The data range is 802.11n. The only problem is that I can't use the adaptor. The box says that the supported OS is MAC OS X. But when I connect the adapter nothing happens. There is not even sign that the USB adapter is connected. Can anyone help me?

    Hi Kelvin,
    I understand that you want to control pins on your serial port using LabVIEW. Since you are using Windows XP, only LabVIEW version 7.0 will be able to control the pins. The pins can be controlled by modifying the values of the access registers that windows associates with each pin. If you are using LabVIEW 7.0, then the VI's located on the Funtions >> Advanced >> Port I/O palette should help you assign values to the proper pins.
    This information can also be found on another discussion forum thread located at the following url:
    http://exchange.ni.com/servlet/ProcessRequest?RHIV​EID=101&RPAGEID=135&HOID=506500000008000000438A000​0&UCATEGORY_0=_49_%24_6_&UCATEGORY_S=0
    Thanks for contacting NI, and I hope this helps.
    Marcus G.
    National Instruments

  • Will it work with R500? Amped Wireless High Power Wireless-3​00N 600mW USB Adapter.

    Hi all, new to this site and also to owning a laptop. Bought what I believe to be 2009 Thinkpad R500. It works well with windows 7 installed. I bought it  so that I could stream music in my shop connected to my stereo. I sometimes think I should have maybe save up a little more and bought a new laptop. Paid $200 for it. Anyway I was wondering if anyone could tell if the item below will work with my laptop? My thoughts are to some time in the near future to also install an outdoor wifi antenna on my house. One thing I did notice in my shop which confused me a little was when I had my laptop and my wife's laptop down in my shop, her signal strength was around 20 mbps and mine only showed 13 mbps. Any ideas to why?
     Add Long Range Wi-Fi to your Computer: Whether you're using a Mac or Windows laptop or desktop PC, the UA600 attaches to an available USB port (2 USB ports for maximum performance) on your computer and provides long range Wi-Fi connectivity for connecting to your home Wi-Fi network or a Wi-Fi hotspot.
    Maximum Wi-Fi Range: The internal High Power 600mW Amplifier (12x the power of standard adapters) is optimally paired with a High Power 5dBi Wi-Fi antenna to provide maximum wireless range and performance.
    Simple Setup: Setup is quick and simple: Insert the installation CD, install the software and plug in the High Power USB Adapter.
    Great for Power Users: The High Power USB Adapter is designed for Wi-Fi users that demand the most from their Wi-Fi networks. The UA600 features wireless data reception speeds of up to 300Mbps for streaming video, transferring large data files and other high traffic Wi-Fi activities.
    Upgradable Antenna for More Wi-Fi Range: The High Power USB Adapter features a detachable antenna that can be replaced with an indoor or outdoor high gain antenna for even more Wi-Fi range or for special installation applications.
    Universal Compatibility: The High Power USB Adapter works great with all 2.4GHz 802.11b/g or n wireless routers, Wi-Fi networks and manufacturers.

    Your machine as it left the factory:
    P8600(2.4GHz), 2GB RAM, 160GB 5400rpm HD, 15.4in 1280x800 LCD, Intel 4500MHD, CDRW/DVDRW, Intel 802.11agn wireless, Modem, 1Gb Ethernet, UltraNav, Secure chip, Fingerprint Reader, 6c Li-Ion, WinXP Pro
    I'm going to take a stab in the dak that the card is Intel 5100AGN, which *should* support both bands. That's what my own R500 came with.
    Depending on the amount of $$ that you want to spend on a router, there are many possible options. I'd suggest checking out the recommendations from various broadband forums.
    Good luck.
    Cheers,
    George
    In daily use: R60F, R500F, T61, T410
    Collecting dust: T60
    Enjoying retirement: A31p, T42p,
    Non-ThinkPads: Panasonic CF-31 & CF-52, HP 8760W
    Starting Thursday, 08/14/2014 I'll be away from the forums until further notice. Please do NOT send private messages since I won't be able to read them. Thank you.

  • ASK THE EXPERTS : High Density Wireless Deployments and CleanAir Technology

    with
    Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to get an update on High Density Wireless Deployments and CleanAir technology with Cisco expert Fred Niehaus. Fred is a technical marketing engineer for the Wireless Networking Business Unit at Cisco, where he is responsible for developing and marketing enterprise wireless solutions using Cisco wireless LAN products. In addition to his participation in major deployments, Fred has served as technical editor for several Cisco Press books including the "Cisco 802.11 Wireless Networking Reference Guide" and "The Business Case for Enterprise-Class Wireless LANs." Prior to joining Cisco with the acquisition of Aironet, Fred was a support engineer for Telxon Corporation, supporting some of the very first wireless implementations for major corporate customers. Fred has been in the data communications and networking industry for more than 20 years and holds a Radio Amateur (Ham) License "N8CPI."
    Remember to use the rating system to let Fred know if you have received an adequate response.
    Fred might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the shortly after the event. This event lasts through June 3, 2011. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.

    You are correct, between the higher numbers of users with multiple devices the bandwidth requirements keep increasing.
    The limitation of three non-overlapping channels in the 2.4 GHz space is driving more customers to 5 GHz, it is important to have both bands when high density deployments are needed.  While many older devices only support 2.4 GHz, we are now seeing far more devices with 5 GHz as well.
    The recomendation of 20-25 clients and 8 voice calls on a given 2.4 GHz channel is still a good "rule of thumb" with actual customer data requirements driving those numbers higher or lower. You are right when you say "throwing Access Points" at the problem can degrade the wireless quality as co-channel interference and overall noise floor can rise with multiple Access Points that can all hear each other.
    A better approach to the problem is to throw more spectrum at this issue (using 5 GHz channels) and elements of 802.11n (20 MHz) bandwidth on 2.4 GHz.
    What we have been doing in high density deployments is to try to minimize the propagation of a cell and focus it in a given direction.  This can be done by
    1. Managing the RF power of the radios (Access Points) and in some cases the client's power (using elements of CCX).
    2. Using the right antennas to shape both Tx and Rx cell size to help isolate, we have recently introduced a new high gain antenna for stadiums that does this well.
    3. Limit supported rates, obviously the higher the data rate the less sensitive the receiver is and the smaller the cell size becomes.
    4. Enable 5 GHz (that adds far more channels for data throughput)
    5. Limit the number of SSIDs in use as each requires a separate beacon (adding to RF utilization)
    6. Co-locating access points with non-overlapping channels
    There are some challenges, for example; many dual -band clients prefer to connect to 2.4 GHz, and 2.4 GHz is more likely to be busier and subject to interference, so we also enable Cisco "Band-Select" which basically "nudges" those clients off 2.4 GHz and pushes them to 5 GHz so as to free up the 2.4 GHz band when we can determine the client has 5 GHz capability.
    So how is this done? well, we do this by listening to the clients and if we detect that the client is sending out probe requests on both bands we know the client can use 5 GHz so we essentially make the 5 GHz band "appear more attractive" to that client.
    Note: Client load balancing and Band select are features in the Cisco Unified controller menu.
    Also enabling client link (intelligent beam forming) helps direct the signal directly at the client and reduces same channel interference.

  • Buffalo AirStation G54 and Airport Express Primer

    A long time back there was a very good primer on how to set up Airport Express using a Buffalo AirStation G54 as a base station. I can't find it using the search feature. Does anyone know where that primer is or have access to the steps required to set these two devices up?
    There was info on the discussions site here and a link to a site with detailed instructions and photos.
    Thanks!
    JoeL

    If you want to configure the Airport Express as a wireless client, just follow David Lovell's instructions posted at the beginning of this discussion:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1113729&#1113729
    If you want to configure the Airport Express to "extend" the Buffalo wireless router's network, you are pretty much on your own. I do recall someone having posted instructions quite some time ago, but that discussion has long since been purged from the discussions server.

  • Where can high-power video cards be installed on a first-gen Mac Pro?

    I have a first-gen Mac Pro with a Radeon X1900 XT in Slot-1 and a Geforce 7300 GT in Slot-4. The x1900 XT powers a 30" monitor and the 7300GT powers 2 x 20" monitors. The 7300GT card died and is being replaced with an 8800 GT.
    Now it seems fairly obvious that for gaming the 8800 GT is superior to my X1900 XT. Ideally I'd like to just throw my new 8800 GT in Slot-1 and use it for my 30" monitor and then run the 2 20's off the X1900 XT in Slot-4. The problem with that is that the x1900 XT is a huge card and physically won't fit in Slot-4 because it runs in to the hard drives above it.
    *Now, on to the questions / clarification:*
    _Question 1_: Is the first-gen Mac Pro the same as the new Mac Pro in that high-power cards can only be used in Slot-1 and Slot-2? If so, why does it come in the standard configuration of:
    Slot-1: x16
    Slot-2: x1
    Slot-3: x1
    Slot-4: x8
    It would seem that Apple purposely did this so you would run 2 high-power cards in Slot-1 and Slot-4 and keep them away from each other for heat reasons. The new Mac Pro has x16 bandwidth on Slot-1 and Slot-2 and it would make sense why they say to only install high-power cards in Slot-1 and Slot-2 for it.
    _Question 2_: PCI-e configurations. There are a few ways I could tweak the configuration of the expansion slots to make this setup work. I'm curious as to which you would think is best:
    *Option 1 (default PCI-e config, only works if a high-power card can be installed in slot 4):*
    Slot-1: x16 - Radeon X1900 XT - 2 x 20" monitors for minor tasks / programs
    Slot-2: x1
    Slot-3: x1
    Slot-4: x8 - GeForce 8800 GT - 30" monitor for major tasks / gaming
    Now, the first issue is can the 8800 even run in Slot-4 due to the supposed power problem? If so, would there be a difference in performance for gaming at x8? I know this is backwards because you'd want the "primary" card to run on x16 but that's just not possible with this PCI-e configuration. If there is a difference in performance would an 8800 GT at x8 still run significantly faster in games than an X1900 XT a x16? I'd think so, but that's assuming the x8 isn't a real bottleneck.
    *Option 2 (the only solution if the cards have to be installed in the first 2 slots):*
    Slot-1: x8 - GeForce 8800 GT - 30" monitor for major tasks / gaming
    Slot-2: x8 - Radeon X1900 XT - 2 x 20" monitors for minor tasks / programs
    Slot-3: x4
    Slot-4: x4
    You still have the issue of the 8800 only running at x8 (if it even makes a difference, not sure). The benefit I see here is that instead of the X1900 XT dumping all of it's heat in to the 8800 GT (since heat rises) you have the 8800 GT on the bottom where it might run cooler. The X1900 XT would then also be limited to x8 but it's not even being used for gaming so it wouldn't matter at all. The X1900 XT is huge and would cover up Slot-3 but I don't use the other 2 slots so I don't mind.
    *Option 3 (only works if Slot-3 can actually power an X1900 XT):*
    Slot-1: x16 - GeForce 8800 GT - 30" monitor for major tasks / gaming
    Slot-2: x1
    Slot-3: x4 - Radeon X1900 XT - 2 x 20" monitors for minor tasks / programs
    Slot-4: x4
    This seems ideal only because this is the only setup that can get the 8800 to run at x16. The issue now is can Slot-3 run a high-power card? The card doesn't really NEED the power since it's just for running basic apps and not gaming. Again, the X1900 would cover up Slot-4 but it's not being used so no worries there.
    *At the end of the day, the most important thing to figure out is:* where can high-power cards be installed in a first-gen mac pro? Once we know that we can figure out Question 2. The instructions that come with the 8800 GT say it can be installed in any of the 4 slots, but I don't know if I really believe that.
    Thanks in advance for your help!

    Thanks for your help, I think we've beat this horse to death :P. I'm glad I got it all figured out though.
    Now the only question is if the gaming performance of the 8800 is actually enough better than the X1900 to warrant making it my "primary" video card. As long as Adobe CS3 apps don't rely on core image like some of the Apple Pro apps do I think it will be fine. If they do I'd have to probably just stick with the X1900 since I use CS3 every single day and only play video games once a week if I'm lucky.
    What are your thoughts on the X1900 vs the 8800 GT for CS3?
    Edit: This just occurred to me... Since I'm going to have to run them as x8, x8, x4, x4 there isn't really going to be a "primary" card since neither will be at 16x. I guess I could technically just plug my 30" monitor in to either one of them depending on what I feel like doing. If I'm going to play a game I just plug in to the 8800 and if I'm working I plug in to the 1900. The computer is up on the desk so moving the monitor from one card to the other takes about 10 seconds. I could just plug 1 20" monitor in to each so there's always a free DVI port on either one.
    It's not the most elegant but I guess it would be a good compromise if I wanted the "best" performance in either situation. I realize the Radeon 3870 is probably the best of both worlds but I really don't want the noise. I already modified my 1900 with this after 6 months of listening to the lawn mower that was the stock 1900 cooler: http://www.arctic-cooling.com/vga2.php?idx=147
    I'm just hoping the 8800 isn't too loud .

  • Why does CC desktop app keep my macbook in high power mode?

    I own Master Collection CS6 and I have creative cloud desktop app installed. The Adobe Updater updated itself as expected. What is unexpected is that the new CC desktop app keeps my laptop (MacBook Pro) in high power mode, even when there are no applications running. Does CC desktop app need my GPU? Really?
    Adobe please fix this!
    Macbook Pro 17" 2.3GHz
    Mac OSX 8.4

    Hi R-Sharp,
    Do you have a Creative Cloud membership? The Creative Cloud desktop app should only be installed if you have a membership. I would expect you to have the Adobe Application Manager instead.
    -Dave

  • I am looking for a lab view schematic for hooking up a high-power motor driver to a linear actuator with feedback

    I need some help coding in labview 2012. I am hooking up a Pololu High-Power Motor Driver 18v25 CS to a Concentric LACT12P-12V-5 Linear Actuator with Feedback: 12" Stroke, 12V, 1.7"/s.  Thanks!

    Hi James,
    How are you planning to hook up your motor driver with PC? Do you have some DAQ device or hardware target to send TTL/PWM signals to driver?
    Regards.

  • Which iMac usb port is high power?

    Which iMac USB port is high power?

    I'm not sure this is the case, at least on the newer iMacs. Some ports will adequately power some devices (most notable the USB Suerdrive) while others won't. Or, this has been the case recently, anyway; USB with Apple devices seems hopelessly arcane anyway, which makes no sense at all!)

  • Sound Blaster X7 High Power Adapter

    I'm enjoying my new X7 but I have 4 ohm speakers. I'd like to purchase the high power adapter to get the full power available, but I can't find it on the website. Does anyone know where to get it or a substitute?

    Ok ... I noticed. Thanks for your patience.
    The high-powered adapter is expected to be released early next year (month). You might want to hold onto the X7 for a while longer to do the upgrade. You may also find this article useful and relevant to what you plan to do.
    Cheers,
    Colin-CL

  • Airport and Buffalo Airstation

    I have an Airport card installed in one Pismo and Buffalo Airstation in another. The airport card is able to recieve a wi-fi network signal, but the Buffalo AirStation reports "There was an error joining the Airport Network linksys".
    What am I doing wrong? Both computers are identically configured for Airport. When I switch cards the Airport card equipped computer is able to access the network and the Buffalo card doesn't.
    I welcome your thoughts.
    Thanks.
    cornelius

    Duane:
    Thanks for getting back to me, and for confirming my guess. The Airstation card worked when I used it at my son-in-law's, receiving a signal from his Airport Extreme base station. So, I am pretty sure the card works. Question now is, where should I look for incompatibility or misconfiguration?
    cornelius

  • Cisco 1240 with TPlink high power

    /* Style Definitions */
    table.MsoNormalTable
    {mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
    mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
    mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
    mso-style-noshow:yes;
    mso-style-priority:99;
    mso-style-parent:"";
    mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt;
    mso-para-margin:0in;
    mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
    mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
    font-size:10.0pt;
    font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
    Hi
    I have a cisco 1240 Access point and I configured it as Access point, and also I have TP-Link TL-WA5110G High Power, and I configure it as  repeater from Cisco. After configured the both access points, the TPlink successfully connected to Csico as repeater and took the SSID and channel, but the it did not pass the IP’s or internet. Why?? Please help me.

    LOL he is totally right, however dont forget that Cisco Aironet is different as Linksys by Cisco...repeater compatibility is not expected eve between them...
    And even using Cisco Aironet, there are some best practice like, use same IOS, if possible same hardware etc...
    You might be asking....

  • [solved] Nautilus - high power consumption

    Hello,
    Can someone reproduce a very high power consumption with nautilus?
    It keeps running although I have closed all windows and causes an enormous power consumption. This is what powertop reports:
    4.67 W 942.2 ms/s 0.00 Process nautilus --new-window /home/orschiro/Downloads
    I am running nautilus 3.8.2-1.
    Last edited by orschiro (2013-10-09 12:29:32)

    Hung thumbnail process? Can you try disabling thumbnails in Nautilus and see if this happens? Close all Nautilus' processes after making the change.

  • No high power USB port???? help??

    Hi people, I just got my new Ipod! but..... I installed everything...and this says I don't have a high power USB port? Can you help me see if I really do have one or give me some help???? This is making me very unhappy
    thanks..

    Ok, I do NOT have a high power USB, but when i connect my Ipod it shows in windows explorer but not in itunes. I tried to use explorer to put songs on the Ipod, and it shows it is on there in explorer, but not on the Ipod...
    How can I get songs on it??

  • Purchased "high power" USB hub, still doesn't charge.

    I found a 4-port USB hub with two "high power" ports (Targus ACH80US), but my iPad still won't charge when attached (yes, to the high power port, yes it's plugged into the wall too).
    Anyone have any ideas? I'm using an older G5 iMac, but it's going through the new "high power" USB hub.

    Copied from this link.
    http://www.apple.com/batteries/ipad.html
    The quickest way to charge your iPad is with the included 10W USB Power Adapter. iPad will also charge, although more slowly, when attached to a computer with a high-power USB port (many recent Mac computers) or with an iPhone Power Adapter. *When attached to a computer via a standard USB port (most PCs or older Mac computers) iPad will charge, but only when it's in sleep mode.* Make sure your computer is on while charging iPad via USB. If iPad is connected to a computer that’s turned off or is in sleep or standby mode, the iPad battery will continue to drain.
    Does your iPad not charge when the iPad is in sleep mode?

Maybe you are looking for

  • IPhone 5s on recovery mode loop after water damage

    A couple days ago I fell asleep and my cat knocked over some water on my desk, and my phone was submerged in maybe a tablespoon of water. When I woke up I noticed there were water smudges inside the screen, but everything was working correctly so I j

  • ITunes keeps asking for password and cant access even account information

    i m on my imac itunes. everything is up to date. i tried to make a purchase with a different credit card and decided to click account info in order to change it. the program keeps pops up with a request of my password. type it in, bounce back and sta

  • Pages 1712 error - my downloaded document wont open

    I am attempting to open a document I downloaded from the bank and all I get is pages 1712 error code. This problem never used to occur before I did the last system upgrade.

  • CRM Interactive Reports Activation

    Hi All We need to activate de Interactive Reports in CRM But we don't know what to do with the BI Client. BI Cliente is a BI product Installed in the Same Sever, but in different Client? Or we just have to customize the the Analytics part in CRM? Our

  • Need Recomendation For Good Audio INterface

    Hello All! I recently got a macbook for christmas along with the GuitarBox from M-Audio. I am wanting to record more than just two input tracks...possibly 8 for a live band. Does anyone have a recommendation for a good audio interface that works well