Buffering not possible, transport restricted

hi,
i am creating ztable. i have domain of type int4. my primary key refers to this domain. while compiling, i get a warning - "Key Field ZZ has num field of type INT4. Buffering not possible, transport restricted".
what does this mean? will i have any problems while transporting to QA and Prod. and Buffering?
J

Data Types for a Characteristic Object:
CHAR
NUMC
DATS
TIMS
Data Types for a Kef Figure Object:
Amount
Quantity
Number
Integer
Date
Time
You should use characteristic data types while using key fields for a buffered table. If you use NUMC , it will work.
regards,
preet

Similar Messages

View Buffering not possible, Transport restricted

Hi Frnds,
I have created a view when I am going to activate the view it is giving me warnings like
All fields are evaluated as key field
Key field KWMENG has num. type QUAN: Buffering not possible, Transport restricted
Key field KBMENG has num. type QUAN: Buffering not possible, Transport restricted
Key field NETPR has num. type CURR: Buffering not possible, Transport restricted
Key field KZWI1 has num. type CURR: Buffering not possible, Transport restricted
Because of these warnings I am not able to transport this view into production.
What might be the reason?
Regards,
Sridhar

Hi Sridhar,
1)Goto RSA6 --Search for ur datasource
2)Click on the same and go to Change Mode
3)Goto the Extract Structure.
4)U can find four TABS there
5)Goto Currency/Quantity Fields.
In that TAB specify for that Obejct the Comp type ,data type,lenght and Decimal.
Rgds
SVU

Video/Screen Sharing via 3G connection not possible - port restrictions?

I'm running Jabber-based iChat AV 5.0.3 sessions from my MBP connected to the Internet via a wireless USB modem 3G/UMTS (German Telekom D1 network). My buddies are connected to the Internet via regular broadband connections (DSL). I have set up a hosted Jabber server via Dreamhost (without SSL, port 5222 used).
Status Quo:
- Contact status of remote Jabber users shows up properly. All buttons (text chat, screen sharing, video) are available (not greyed out) on both sides.
- Text chat works fine.
- Video chat and screen sharing can be invoked from both sides (confirmation window shows up), but after confirmation the initiation process doesn't finish successfully. The video/screen sharing session doesn't run. *iChat AV shows a message indicating that it doesn't receive an answer from the remote user device.* If the iChat session is initiated from a buddy's computer, the buddy gets the same message respectively.
- For testing purposes, I changed the internet connection on my MBP from the mobile 3G USB modem to a regular *DSL broadband connection (same ISP, German Telekom). In this scenario, video/audio calls and screen sharing work flawlessly!* Therefore, I assume that the problems in 3G connection mode is caused by the ISP (German Telekom) blocking/restricting ports required by iChat AV for initiating the video call and streaming the data on their 3G network.
Is there any way to bypass ISP restrictions, by either changing specific iChat AV port settings on both ends (client devices) or by port forwarding? If yes, which settings should I change? Unfortunately, it's couldn't find any document indicating which ports are opened/allowed by German Telekom's 2G/3G (GSM/UMTS) network.
Below is an excerpt of the error message produced by iChat AV:
iChat Connection Log:
2010-11-09 21:18:19 +0100: AVChat started with ID 494414145.
2010-11-09 21:18:19 +0100: [email protected]: State change from AVChatNoState to AVChatStateWaiting.
2010-11-09 21:18:19 +0100: 0x1a8bf8b0: State change from AVChatNoState to AVChatStateInvited.
2010-11-09 21:18:28 +0100: 0x1a8bf8b0: State change from AVChatStateInvited to AVChatStateConnecting.
2010-11-09 21:18:28 +0100: [email protected]: State change from AVChatStateWaiting to AVChatStateConnecting.
2010-11-09 21:18:48 +0100: 0x1a8bf8b0: State change from AVChatStateConnecting to AVChatStateEnded.
2010-11-09 21:18:48 +0100: 0x1a8bf8b0: Error -8 (Did not receive a response from 0x1a8bf8b0.)
2010-11-09 21:18:48 +0100: [email protected]: State change from AVChatStateConnecting to AVChatStateEnded.
2010-11-09 21:18:48 +0100: [email protected]: Error -8 (Did not receive a response from 0x1a8bf8b0.)
Video Conference Error Report:
0.000000 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/DotMacConfiguration.m:1039 type=4 (FFFFFFFF/2)
[HTTP GET failed (0)]
0.000627 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/DotMacConfiguration.m:758 type=4 (FFFFFFFF/0)
[HTTP GET failed (0)]
0.346813 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/DotMacConfiguration.m:758 type=4 (FFFFFFFF/0)
[HTTP GET failed (0)]
1331.086051 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/SIP/SIP.c:2917 type=4 (900A0015/0)
[SIPConnectIPPort failed]
1333.086142 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/SIP/SIP.c:2917 type=4 (900A0015/0)
[SIPConnectIPPort failed]
1335.086270 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/SIP/SIP.c:2917 type=4 (900A0015/0)
[SIPConnectIPPort failed]
1337.086603 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/SIP/SIP.c:2917 type=4 (900A0015/0)
[SIPConnectIPPort failed]
1339.087985 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/SIP/SIP.c:2917 type=4 (900A0015/0)
[SIPConnectIPPort failed]
1341.088212 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/SIP/SIP.c:2917 type=4 (900A0015/0)
[SIPConnectIPPort failed]
1343.088361 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/SIP/SIP.c:2917 type=4 (900A0015/0)
[SIPConnectIPPort failed]
Video Conference Support Report:
929.446913 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2059 type=2 (00000000/0)
[Connection Data for call id: 1 returns 1
934.996640 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2074 type=2 (00000000/0)
[Prepare Connection With Remote Data - remote VCConnectionData: 1, local VCConnectionData: 1
935.002114 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2266 type=2 (00000000/0)
[Initiate Conference To User: u0 with Remote VCConnectionData: 1 with Local Connection Data: 1 conferenceSettings: 1]
935.467624 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/SIP/Transport.c:2138 type=1 (00000000/0)
[INVITE sip:user@rip:16402 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP lip:16402;branch=z9hG4bK0fdd30e326aa779b
Max-Forwards: 70
To: "u0" <sip:user@rip:16402>
From: "0" <sip:user@lip:16402>;tag=544473054
Call-ID: 9c7ecf46-ec3d-11df-8530-f81eeb5f4012@lip
CSeq: 1 INVITE
Contact: <sip:user@lip:16402>;isfocus
User-Agent: Viceroy 1.4
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 708
Video Conference User Report:
928.427249 @:0 type=5 (00000000/16402)
[Local SIP port]
934.996832 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2171 type=5 (00000000/0)
*[Remote Router]*
*[PORT RESTRICTED]*
934.996842 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2173 type=5 (00000000/0)
[Remote CommNAT Result: 0x000000d0
936.003962 @:0 type=5 (00000000/60)
[Detected bandwidth (kbits/s): 2627 up, 2627 down. (00000000)
936.033015 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VideoConferenceMultiController.m:2423 type=5 (00000000/0)
[Start Conference With UserID: u0]
978.787787 @:0 type=5 (00000000/16402)
[Local SIP port]
1014.011790 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2171 type=5 (00000000/0)
[Remote Router]
[PORT RESTRICTED]
1014.011800 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2173 type=5 (00000000/0)
[Remote CommNAT Result: 0x000000d0
1015.024555 @:0 type=5 (00000000/60)
[Detected bandwidth (kbits/s): 2627 up, 2627 down. (00000000)
1015.031800 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VideoConferenceMultiController.m:2423 type=5 (00000000/0)
[Start Conference With UserID: u0]
1323.083386 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2171 type=5 (00000000/0)
[Remote Router]
[PORT RESTRICTED]
1323.083396 @/SourceCache/VideoConference/VideoConference-415.22/Video Conference/VCInitiateConference.m:2173 type=5 (00000000/0)
[Remote CommNAT Result: 0x000000d0
(…)

Hi,
Does this 3G device have any set up functions that are on your Mac ?
If it does not it is likely that it is wide open to all Port (65535 of them).
I presume that in System Preferences > Network you see a Public IP when using this device ?
Again this would tend to pint to all the ports being open.
Is there anything on the ISP's web site that suggests this device is unsuitable to be used with VoIP or SIP connections ?
VoIP (Voice over the Internet) uses the SIP connection process the way iChat does.
Most likely the issues is the way packets are sent.
When you do a download, for instance, do you find the speed increases in the first few minutes ?
When some data packets are sent over the Internet the next one is not sent until confirmation that the first has arrived.
This Latency effects Point to Point WiFi (antenna to Dish on House) and satellite connections mostly particularly when it is a two way thing.
It can effect Mobile/Cell phone type connections.
What sort of Speeds are you getting on the 3G device ?
http://www.speedtest.net/
Do these seem to get faster as the time proceeds ? (this can be difficult to spot).
The Log mentions one end being at just over 2Gbps although it does not make it clear which end.
As the Remote end is the end that reports "Router: Port Restricted" and it works over standard DSL we have to presume they have the ports open.
You could try restricting iChat 's Bandwidth in iChat menu > Preferences > Video Section to 500kbps (try it at both ends)
If that does not work try 200kbps
This may stop iChat from trying to send data too Fast for the Network Connections.
Realistically there are a few too many variables here.
It could be Speed of data throughout at the Initiation point. (Slow Start up of data transfer)
It could be an Internal setting preventing SIP.
It could be that the 3G network sends and receives data by different routes.
(I have seen this once when a ISP was repairing some Cabling. To maintain end user speeds they managed their own network to split Incoming and outgoing data to the end point.)
iChat does not like this as it checks the IPs and the Hops (number of intermediate stages/servers) and if the data is different it will not connect (Man in the Middle attack protection).
I can't remember the last time I knew of someone being successful with either an 3G USB dongle or a 3G phone as Modem (internet Sharing).
Despite my ideas I think you will be unlucky and this will not work.
10:31 PM Saturday; November 13, 2010
Please, if posting Logs, do not post any Log info after the line "Binary Images for iChat"

Not possible to restrict BI content installation?

In my attempts to restrict RSA1 to display access, I have created an empty role and provided only 2 transaction codes: RSA1 and SU53 (for analysis). Having given this bare minimum, practically everything is "restricted" or display-access only in RSA1 except BI Content.
When I click "BI Content", and choose an InfoPackage under "Object Types", I am able to install this InfoPackage. Is there anyway to restrict the installation of BI Content at all? Keeping in mind my role has only provides access to RSA1 and SU53, it should NOT allow me to install any content.
Any suggestions are greatly welcome! As an aside, I did not even add S_RS_ADMWB and still, I can execute RSA1 and run okay.

I did try to add S_RS_ADMWB and in that authorization object, there are 2 fields:
ACTVT = '03' (Display)
RSADMWBOBJ = ....
APPLCOMP     Application Component
BIA_ZA             BI Accelerator Monitor Checks and Actions
BR_SETTING     Broadcasting Settings
CNG_RUN     Attribute Change Run
CONT_ACT     Activation of BI Content
CONT_ADMIN     Administration (Customer) Content System
DOC_ADMIN     Administration of Document Store
DOC_HIER     Hierarchy Documents
DOC_MAST     Master Data Documents
DOC_META     Meta Data Documents
DOC_TRAN     Transaction Data Documents
IMG_BI     Changes to IMG (for BI)
INFOAREA     InfoArea
INFOOBJECT     InfoObject
INFOPACKAG     InfoPackage
METADATA     Metadata
MONITOR     Monitor
NAMESPACE     BI Namespaces
OLAP_CACHE     OLAP Cache Objects
RA_PACKAGE     Reporting Agent packet
RA_SETTING     Reporting Agent setting
REMOD_RULE     Remodeling Rule
SETTINGS     Settings
SOURCESYS     Source System
USE_DND     Drag&Drop to InfoAreas and Application Components
WORKBENCH     Workbench
To me, the objects that seem to require restriction under BI Content would be: CONT_ACT and CONT_ADMIN. Including these objects and setting the ACTVT to '03' still yields the same result. Even when I set ACTVT to '03' and include '*' for all objects - still the same, I am able to install and activate BI Content (InfoPackages).

2 consolidation routes, one transport layer - not possible

Hello everyone,
I have one DEV system and two QAS systems. Some of my development need to go to both of two systems, however some of them need to go to only one of my QAS.
So I have set up two transport groups: one link to both of two QAS and another one link to one of them. Because it is not possible for 2 consolidation routes with one transport layer, so there would be much of trouble when I need to transport my own development into that one QAS------I need to manually change the object directory entry/package for it first.
So I would like to know is there any way easier to set up the landscape so that the developer can easily choose the correct transport target in our situation?
Thank you very much in advance for your help!
Best regards,
Keith

Hi Keith,
please do not mix up transport groups (systems sharing one transport directory) with transport target groups.
If you have one development system DEV and two QA-Systems QA1 / QA2 then there are 3 options: Transport from DEV to QA1 only, transport from DEV to QA2 only and transport from DEV to both QA1 and QA2. To realize this, you need three consolidation routes starting in DEV. One with transport layer (say) ZQA1 pointing to QA1, one with transport layer (say) ZQA2 pointing to QA2 and on with transport layer (say) ZALL pointing to the transport target group which in turn points to QA1 and QA2. Then you need to create 3 packages (formerly: development classes) poining to one of these three transport layers. For example ZPACKZQA1, ZPACKZQA2, ZPACKZALL. Then when you create a programm you need to specify a package. Depending on the package you choose, the program will be transported to either QA1 only, QA2 only or both QA1 and QA2.
Best regards
Thomas

Is it possible to restrict the user from creating a sibling and allow him to ONLY create child nodes in DRM?

When in a hierarchy, a user right clicks on a node to crate a new node, he has two options
-Child
-Sibling
Is it possible to restrict the user from creating a sibling and allow him to ONLY create child nodes?
Business cases:
1. different level nodes need to have different prefixes.
- Thus, the default prefix property definition uses the level number to assign a prefix
- Also, a validation, to ensure the correct prefix, uses the level number
But if the user can create a child and a sibling then the default prefix will only be right for a single case and not both.
Thanks

If the images are exactly the same size then make sure the layer with the mask
is the active layer and in the other documents go to Select>Load Selection and choose
your document with the layer mask under Source document and under channel choose the layer mask.
After the selection loads press the layer mask icon at the bottom of the layers panel.
MTSTUNER

HT201304 Is it possible to restrict access to specific IOS apps based on the WIFI profile that a user has connected to?

Is it possible to restrict access to specific IOS apps based on the WIFI profile that a user has connected to?

you might be able to block it if the app uses Internet access
and depending on your wireless you might be able to block a specific user
accessing the backend host that the app uses
some firewalls offer application filtering but I'm not aware of any that work with ios apps

IS IT POSSIBLE TO RESTRICT A PARTICULAR MATERIAL GROUP FOR A USER

Hi Gurus,
I want to know whether it is possible to restrict a particular material group for a particular user.
e.g Material Group : 101
User : ADMIN
Our requirement is that the user should not be able to select material group 101 in
any stock related transactions. e.g MB5B, MB51, etc.
Thanks
Amol

Hi Amol
You ca try Tcode OMT3E where in u can maintain settings relatesd to Users.
Regards

Is it possible to restrict printing via e-mail to one or a few domains?

Regarding HP ePrinting
Per default any emails will be printed, it is possible to restrict to certain e-mail addresses
Is it possible to restrict print per e-mail to a domain or a few domains, to get a better security and a more simple administration?
example:
e-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] ... etc.
Rule in HP ePrint: *@mymaildomain.com

Hi,
It is possible to restrict printing for allowed senders only,
You will have to add any email you would like to allow accessing, adding a bulk domain nake is not possible..
ePrintCenter lets you control who can e-mail print jobs to your HP product from mobile or network connected devices. Follow these steps set your ePrint-enabled product to receive print jobs from allowed senders only.
Log into your ePrintCenter account at HP ePrintCenter .
On the ePrintCenter Printers page, click ePrint Settings . The ePrint Settings window opens.
On the Allowed Senders tab, select Allowed Senders Only , and then click Save .
Type an allowed sender's email address in the dialog box, and then click Add Email . The email address is added to the Allowed Email Addresses list.
NOTE:You may specify up to 500 e-mail addresses allowed to send print jobs to your product. Your HP product ignores e-mail from addresses not on your allowed senders list.
(Optional ). To send a confirmation email to the sender after the ePrint job prints successfully, select the check box next to the email address in the Email job status column.
NOTE:To remove an email address from the Allowed Email Addresses list, click the X next to the email address in the Remove column.
Say thanks by clicking the Kudos thumb up in the post.
If my post resolve your problem please mark it as an Accepted Solution

Error : Modification not possible- while creating source system in BI7

Hi BI Guru's,
We are using BI7 and source system ECC6 ,We are about to move to production, When creating the source system in BI PRD system we getting the Error Modification not possible.we created RFC connection, background user and remote connection works fine.
Is there any body put some light on this issue
thanks in advance,
Regards,
Mohan

Mohan,
Check if your logical systems are in place in SCC4 and also in the transport connection.
Also check if you are connecting to the source system by IP Address or by logical name.
Accordingly you would have to maintain the source system connections.
Arun

Error importing *.SCA file into NWDS: Import (into source SC) not possible

All,
When attempting to import an SCA into a new project in NWDS, an "Import (into source SC) not possible: SCA doesn't contain DC sources" occurs. Any assistance to fix this issue appreciated.
Thanks,
Lee

You can indeed import SCAs into local development configurations in NWDS (Eclipse). You have to have a pre-existing software component of the same name and vendor which may or may not be empty.
In the Development Infrastructure perspective in NWDS 7.1, just right-click on the software component you want to overwrite with the import and choose "Import".
To import SCAs into a CMS track in the NWDI, you have to go to http://<NWDI server>:5<nn instance no>00/devinf/ and import the SCAs from the transport inbox directory of the NWDI server. Don't forget to maintain the SLD if necessary.
Cheers,
Thorsten

Subject:-Tax reduction in invoice is not possible at the time of LIV when c

Dear SAP expert
Subject:-Tax reduction in invoice is not possible at the time of LIV when corresponding order is closed.
While carrying out the LIV of vendor invoice against service entry sheet , ERROR message of Order xxxxxxx created in PM module is closed. Main reasons for the same is Service tax at time of service entry sheet is 12% and at the time of invoice verification it is 3.96% and reduced tax amount is credited to order. Which we can say is restricted as after Order closure cost cannot be changed on order.
Is there any solution available?
s ap

Hi,
In response to your requirement:
let me clear my business scenario...
total price of po is usd100 and sales tax is 20%.
system calculate sales tax separate the reason being the codition type for sales tax is statistical.
is it possible that the value of sales tax included in the PO net price but not calculate at the time of GR.
Regards,
Ali
This is very much possible. Include your tax condition type in the calculation of net price and make this tax as deductible.Donot assign NVV key to it.
Also donot make it statistical as you want to include it in the net price calculation.
Thanks,
Atal

Error Message: Creation of Temporary Table "#BIMC_SETS" not possible

Hello,
I am trying to get data from HANA Virtual Data Model (VDM) from MDX connection in MS Excel. The VDM Views and models are visitble after the connection is successfully made.
But when I try to fetch the data, I get the following error:
"Creation of Temporary Table "BIMC_SETS" is not possible".
Can someone let me know how to resolve this?
Best regards,
Akhil

Hi Lars,
I am getting the same error. We are trying to build a role for Adhoc reporting. The role has analytic privilege, object privilege with select on individual models in _SYS_BIC (models we want to expose and part of AP), object privilege on _SYS_BI with select and execute and also object privilege execute on REPOSITORY_REST.
I am able to execute the models using Lumira and Analysis for excel, however getting error with MDX connection.
Also we want to try and restrict direct ODBC access to HANA using query from excel. With the above privileges user is able to see all the M_ views and get data for it. Can we restrict this?
We are on SP6 rev 67.
Thanks,
Aamod

XI IDoc Acknowledgement - Acknowledgement not possible status

Hi Experts,
My scenario:
SAP IDOC - XI - jdbc (oracle)
Problem:
Getting the infamous "Acknowledgement not possible" status in SXI_MONI. I only need the transport acknowledgements back to SAP not the application acknowledgements. The messages themselves route fine from source to destination.

check if this blog helps you:
/people/saravanakumar.kuppusamy2/blog/2005/01/20/configuration-tips-for-a-business-serviceintegration-process-to-send-back-ale-audit-idoc
From the blog:
The system acknowledgement sent by the file adapter is converted into an ALE audit message and sent
back to the sender SAP system by an IDOC ACK channel configured in XI(an IDOC receiver adapter).
For your info:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/903a0abc-e56e-2910-51a8-9dc616df56eb
Edited by: abhishek salvi on May 15, 2009 10:48 AM

Is it not possible to give the select single field without an into clause

Hi,
i have to check whether my input value( only one filed) is available in the table.
for eg i need to check whether company code is available in the table t001.
then i will give .
data lv_bukrs type t001-bukrs.
lv_bukrs = 1010.
select single bukrs from t001 where bukrs = lv_bukrs.
here its asking for me to give a vaible to store the bukrs that is
select single bukrs into dummyvalue from t001 where bukrs = lv_bukrs.
Is it not possible to give the select single fieldname without an into clause

Its Possible by declaring the tables statement
<b>tables : AFKO.
select single * from AFKO where <condition>.</b>
If SINGLE is specified, the resulting set has a single line. If the remaining additions to the SELECT command select more than one line from the database, the first line that is found is entered into the resulting set. The data objects specified after INTO may not be internal tables, and the APPENDING addition may not be used. The addition ORDER BY can also not be used.
An exclusive lock can be set for this line using the FOR UPDATE addition when a single line is being read with SINGLE. The SELECT command is used in this case only if all primary key fields in logical expressions linked by AND are checked to make sure they are the same in the WHERE condition. Otherwise, the resulting set is empty and sy-subrc is set to 8. If the lock causes a deadlock, an exception occurs. If the FOR UPDATE addition is used, the SELECT command circumvents SAP buffering.
Notes
When SINGLE is being specified, the lines to be read should be clearly specified in the WHERE condition, for the sake of efficiency. When the data is read from a database table, the system does this by specifying comparison values for the primary key.
If accessing tables for which SAP buffering is planned for single records, the SAP buffer is bypassed if the addition SINGLE is not specified. This behavior depends on the current implementation of the database interface and may change in future releases. In particular, it should not be used to bypass the SAP buffer. You should use the explicit addition BYPASSING BUFFER for this instead.
The addition SINLGE is not permitted in a subquery.
Regards
- Gopi

Buffering not possible, transport restricted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for