BUG: Declaring Method Validation (Validation Rules)

JDev Team!
Situation:
WHen I create validationXXX() on Entity level or validationXXX(...) methods and I set my custom error message (MessageBundle created for this Entity) and then rum UML application or tester for application module I didn't get defined message. I got some generic message.
Same thing happend when I create validation rule and connect to entity or attribute.
What do I wrong or anybody help me?

Messages provided via the editor when you select a method-validation rule are generated in the message bundle file but are not used at runtime when the method validation fails. The expectation is that the method itself will use the message when throwing an exception. However a number of folks have reported this confusion via OTN and other means and an ER (2716501) has been logged to modify this behavior so that if the user does not throw a JboException in the method itself, that the framework will pick up the supplied error message to throw.

Similar Messages

Customer Master Data - Validation / Substitution Rule

Is there a way to perform a validation / substitution rule in the customer master data?
Eg: In customer master, payment history checkbox is a required field so the user will always have to tick the checkbox when creating a customer master.
Question: how to make this payment history checkbox defaulted to tick so that user don't have to manually tick it themselves when creating customer master.
Is there a validation / substitution that can be performed in customer master because in accounting document, we will be able to perform the validation/substitution.

Hi
You could potentially use a BADI to substitute the data. IMG > Financial Accounting > Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable > Customer Accounts > Master Data > Preparations for Creating Customer Master Data > Adoption of Customer's Own Master Data Fields > Business Add-In: Customer Subscreens
You'd need to get an ABAPer to code the change in the relevant Method.
Kylie

Error while validating Business Rule (Error Cause: nativeGetNewTLA Rule)

Hi, I am receiving an error while validating business rules
An error occurred in: Rule:HypLive.Plan1.Product Interest
A validation error was received from the Planning server 'http://abc:8300/HyperionPlanning/servlet/HspAppManagerServlet?appname=HypLive'.
'Error:
Error Cause: nativeGetNewTLA Rule HypLive.Plan1.Product Interest'.

Are you able to validate the rule in EAS (or Calc Manager)?
Normally nativeGetNewTLA Rule is followed by out of memory errors like java.lang.OutOfMemoryError,
Increase the heap size to 1024, re start Planning and try validating it again.
Cheers..!!

Valid settlement rules

We received a request from the business to block time entry charges for WBS with C* status. Also, block time
charges for PM order and Network order if their settlement receiver WBS is in C* status.
I was trying to find a transaction or functionality in SAP that will provide me all valid settlement rules (senders and receivers) in a given project.
Before users can charge labor time to a charge object 'orders' (PM or network orders), validity of the settlement rules need to be checked. If there's a valid settlement rule, the status of the settlement receiver will be checked to determine if time entry for the charge object can be allowed.
Basically, what I'm looking for is anything that will give me the valid settlement rules of the settlement receiver given a specific period or date.

Hi
Even though system allows you to specify the percentage in PM order ,it will not allow you to settle the cost.Just execute the settlement process KO88 and check
regards
thyagarajan

Validation Business Rule Problem

Hi Community
I´m working with SAP BPC 7.0 NW SP09 Consolidation, the problem I have is when I execute the validation package, the result of the Validation Rule because the business rule don´t respect the number sign of the value calculated.
For example I try to confirm this formula ASSETS = LIABILITIES + EQUITY
ASSETS      AST   1000
LIABILITIES LEQ     800
EQUITY        LEQ     400
RESULT                  -200
BUSINESS RULE      200
I was investigating all the posible combinations of dimensions, and I found it could be possible that this error occurs when (Liabilities + Equity) > Asset.
Rule
VAL01     ASSETS=LIABILITIES
Rule Details
Validation Account     Account 1     Flow 1     Sign 1     Account 2     Flow 2     Sign 2     REMARK
VAL01     ASSETS     F_CLO     1     LIABILITIES     F_CLO     1
ASSETS and LIABILITIES are configures as part of dimlist property, where Liabilities have all the equity accounts too.
Hope anyone help me with this problem
Thanks in advance

Hello Ruben
If Account: VAL01 is 'AST' account than Validation Business Rule will give 200 as the result.For 'LEQ' result will be -200.
I think the business rule is working as expected.
Hope this help.
Regards
Venkatesh KPS

Validation business rule on a cumulative basis with periodic data storage

Hi BPC Experts,
Is it possible to set up a validation business rule on a cumulative basis when we have periodic data storage type?
Appreciate your assistance with this.
Thanks.
Mila

Hi Mila
Please could you tell me how you solved the issue?
We have it the other way round, a YTD storage, but would like to validate accounts on a periodic basis.
Thanks for sharing your findings.
Melanie

Validation business rule

Hi,
I am trying to reconcile account 1 with accounts 2 to 8 with a validation business rule. When I define the rule, I have one line with account 1 and account 2 filled and another 6 lines with only account 2 filled. This creates an error on validating the rule.
How can I create such a validation rule?
Thanks,
Arnold

Instead of using a validation rule I have set this up as an account transformation rule which works just as well and doesn't generate any errors.

EA1 BUG: Editing a Process Validation then cancelling appends spaces to lines

There is a bug in the Unit Testing section of SQL Developer where spaces are appended to Process Validations.
To re-create the bug:
Create a Process Validation and type a multi line SQL statement e.g.
    select count (*)
    from USER_TABLES
    where TABLE_NAME = 'EMP'
Edit the Process Validation and click "Cancel"
Edit the Process Validation again - a space will have been appended to the end of the each line.
The above can be repeated, so editing and cancelling five times will append five spaces to each line.
This bug was present in version 3.2.2 (see my previous post) and is still present in version 4.0.0.12.27.

quote:
However, where it's become something not just mildly annoying
but seriously broken is that sometimes, it adds large chunks of
space in the MIDDLE of your continued lines, sometimes even inside
the quotes, which of course makes the text break by adding a whole
bunch of space where it shouldn't be.
I've noticed this bug too and it can really screw things up
when it adds spaces in the middle of subsequent lingo commands.
It's one of the main reasons I started using an external script
editor.

[svn:fx-3.x] 16321: Backport trunk rev 15228 to fix bug SDK-25731 - Clearing validation result (via 'errorString') prevents new validations.

Revision: 16321
Revision: 16321
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-05-25 15:01:42 -0700 (Tue, 25 May 2010)
Log Message:
Backport trunk rev 15228 to fix bug SDK-25731 - Clearing validation result (via 'errorString') prevents new validations.
I tried to do this with svn merge and it didn't work so I merged it by hand. The bug file seems to work correctly now.
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-25731
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/branches/3.x/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as

Validation Business rules..

Hi all,
          Does the validation business rules work on parent/ calculated members of other dimension other than the account and the account flow..
im using the accounts
SOURCE..
ACCOUNT              ACCOUNTFLOW      OTHERDIM1
SR10313000     F_CLO                        NONE1
DESTINATION
ACCOUNT              ACCOUNTFLOW      OTHERDIM1
SA10411200     F102                           PARENT
SA10411200     F103                           PARENT
which   PARENT has a CHILD1 AND CHILD2 children.....
Thanks..

Hi,
I don't think business rules work on parent or calculated members( though I haven't tried it), as business rules are developed using SQL stored procedures, which use the data in relational data base( fact tables), not the analysis server and fact table only has values of base members..
if any one has tried this scenario, may be they could share more knowledge.
Kranthi

Error in Validation Business Rule

Hello Experts,
I am trying to perform validation on Intercompany Account Receivable and Account Payable accounts. For the same I added the Validation business rule, but getting an error while trying to save and validate the business rule. The error is:
Error = "No Data to Validate"
I have data in these accounts that I am performing validation on. Also, I am able to save and validate the Validation Rules Table.
Experts, could you please provide suggestions regarding why I am getting this error and how to resolve it.
Thanks
Rahul

Hello,
is this with the Product Hyperion Financial Management?
If yes, you might close the issue here and post it in the HFM group.
Regards,
Philip Hulsebosch

SAP BPC 5.1 Validation Tolerance in Validation Business Rules

I am trying to use the the validation tolerance field in the validation business rules and I make it work
This is how i understand it:
For example, I am trying to create a control that check that net assets = equity in the balance sheet with a tolerance of 10.
I have set up the following validation rule header and detail:
Header: CTRL1 ;validation operand = ; validation tolerance 10; all other fields are blank
Details: CTRL1; account1=netassets;flow1=F_CLO;SIign1=1;account2=equity;flow2=F_CLO;sign2=1
After running the validation package:
If my netassets-equity=9--> i should see CTRL1=0
If my netassets-equity=-5--> i should see CTRL1=0
If my netassets-equity=15--> I should see CTRL1=15
Is my understanding correct? Has anyone been able to use the validation tolerance?
Regards
Lena

In addition to James comments, I just wanted to add a few additional notes:
1. The Demo application that was presented contains the applications that you described in your question. Historically, the consulting team would either use the ApShell or the demo as the foundation for developing a set of applications for the customer based on the design sessions held with the customer. BAsed on the customer requirements and design, often we start with ApShell and pull in components from the Demo that would support functionality requirements that may go beyond what Apshell has out of the box. Many of these components are covered in an Advanced Training for BPC, including the helpful and not so helpful components.
2. You can pull many of the Demo dimension files, logic scripts and rules from the Application Server file folders for use in an Application set design. Unfortunately, BPF's can not be transfered, since they are built in to an application and reside in tables in SQL. In addition, many BPF's need to be defined to meet a customers requirements, file names, location, users, and dimension structure.
3. Many of the dimensions utilize several supporting properties that may be added via the admin console to any dimension. The properties are a key ingrediaent to a well running application set, supporting reporting, script logic, and business rules.
4. The Performance dashboard is no longer an option that is included out-of -the-box, howvere it is just a shell that was adjustable to the application set designed for the customer.

[svn:bz-trunk] 23143: Certain code needs to check the existence of the class validation validator (some brokers and other listeners) during message broker init, however the validator was not being created till the very end of the method .

Revision: 23143
Revision: 23143
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-10-27 06:31:02 -0700 (Thu, 27 Oct 2011)
Log Message:
Certain code needs to check the existence of the class validation validator (some brokers and other listeners) during message broker init, however the validator was not being created till the very end of the method. Promote it to be at the top instead of at the bottom.
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/MessagingConfiguration.java

Revision: 23143
Revision: 23143
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-10-27 06:31:02 -0700 (Thu, 27 Oct 2011)
Log Message:
Certain code needs to check the existence of the class validation validator (some brokers and other listeners) during message broker init, however the validator was not being created till the very end of the method. Promote it to be at the top instead of at the bottom.
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/core/src/flex/messaging/config/MessagingConfiguration.java

When registering at websites, my correct email address is declared "not a valid email"

Often when I try to register at websites, my correct email is declared "not a valid email". Sometimes when I enter it over and over, it is accepted but not always. I have tried several email addresses and no luck solving the problem.

There are websites that do not accept email addresses from domains like Hotmail or Yahoo!, but require an email address from your ISP. So if you use one of those then you may need another email address for such sites.

Declaration method in users Class

What's different between declaration method in these codes
class Programm
ClassA class1 = new ClassA();
class1.TestMethod();
public ClassA
public void TestMethod()
and
class Programm
ClassA.TestMethod();
public ClassA
internal static void TestMethod()

There are 2 main differences.
Your access modifier is different (public / internal). See this link for information about the 4 different access modifier. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms173121.aspx
Your first method has instance scope and the second one has a static/global scope. See this link on what the difference is between the 2. https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa645629(v=vs.71).aspx
-Igor

BUG: Declaring Method Validation (Validation Rules)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for