BUG: Face Recognition splatters Face Tag rectangles all over my Images

hello,
happend a few times with a new catalog.
i run the people view and everything but faces are recognized as faces.
green gras, white walls, blue sky etc.
and i don´t mean a few images i mean 2-4 wrong rectangels per image.... for hundreds of images (i stopped it or it would be way more).
happend a few times now.
also the keywords in the keywording windows do not change when i enter people view.
i mean the windows only shows the keyword of one image and when i change the image in grid view, the keywords of the actual image are not shown. (the window is not updated)
they are also stuck when i close people view. only a LR restarts helps.
i run windows 7 x64
32gb ram
980gtx (latest drivers)

example.... hundreds like these in people view.
not always but it happens.
then i manually have to delete them.
honestly, i think adobe should ask google how to do facial recognition right.

Similar Messages

  • Face Recognition Wrong Face

    Face Recognition use to work fairley well. Most of the time it get's it right.
    Lately it's been asking me if this is [insert name here...John Doe]? and it's not even close. This person been tag in the past as Jane Doe.  How do I get it to start recognizing Jane Doe again as Jane Doe and not John Doe?

    Hi fader5,
    I'm curious to know how come it suggest John instead of Jane all of a sudden.
    What version of PSE are you using?
    Is the tag Jane Doe still present in your tag tree and is not renamed by any chance?
    Thanks
    andaleeb

  • Colored rectangles all over page when firefox is maximized

    when I have firefox maximized, blue-green, red, and black rectangular blocks appear all over the page...I know it's not my monitor, it's cable, or my graphics card...all have been tested...when I uninstalled firefox and used ie, the issue did not exist...I just now reinstalled firefox with no add-ons, and the problem immediately returns...I really prefer using firefox but this display issue is troublesome

    Start Firefox in <u>[[Safe Mode]]</u> to check if one of the extensions is causing the problem (switch to the DEFAULT theme: Firefox (Tools) > Add-ons > Appearance/Themes).
    * Don't make any changes on the Safe mode start window.
    * https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode
    * https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes
    In Firefox 4 [http://kb.mozillazine.org/Safe_mode Safe mode] disables extensions and disables hardware acceleration.
    * Tools > Options > Advanced > General > Browsing: "Use hardware acceleration when available"
    If disabling hardware acceleration works then check if there is an update available for your graphics display driver.
    In Firefox 4 you can use one of these to start in <u>[[Safe mode]]</u>:
    * Help > Restart with Add-ons Disabled
    * Hold down the Shift key while double clicking the Firefox desktop shortcut (Windows)

  • Conditional Build Tags Generated All Over Topics in RoboHelp 9 (HTML)

    I'm creating a help system and user manual using RoboHelp 9. The whole thing depends very heavily upon the conditional build tags. (Some parts are online and others are only for the print version of the manual.)
    Here's my problem: When I go back to topics I've already created, the tags are automatically generated in the wrong parts of the topic. The error lies in how RoboHelp is generating the HTML behind the scenes. (This was verified by one of our in-house developers who was thoroughly amused with RoboHelp's attempt at writing HTML.) I'm at my wits end. We have tried generating a new help system, only importing images from the old help system. It worked fine for awhile, but then the same problem cropped up. Is this some sort of bug? Is there a setting that I'm overlooking?
    I'm officially at my wits end. Help.

    Never seen what you're describing - when you tag text in a topic with a CBT, it stays stuck to it - there's no auto generation of CBTs. When you create your help, you specify what to show & what to hide in your SSL layout recipe.

  • Face recognition using labview

    I, am into my final year project. I am  doing face recognition using labview. I want to know how to compare image using labview. it would be  great if someone helped , as it is proving to be a major obstacle in my way

    Hi Sibom,
    There are various face recognizing algorithms available. If your purpose is simple face recognition, then the simplest method would be to segment the image using a line, and to perform the recognition for every tilt of the image.Tthus when the line traces 180 degrees, all possible positions would have been verified. 
    If you like a more holistic approach you can have a look at the trace transform model and the active appearance model, which are used in the industry.
    These models can be studied at : 
     http://www.face-rec.org/algorithms/#Image
    Here are a few other algorithms for face recognition :
    *Automated Face Detection System utilizing USB WebCam 
    *Face Recognition using Vector Quantization Histogram Technique 
    Regards,
    Siva
    A Face Recognition Software using Vector Quantization Histogram Technique 

  • Qosmio F750-03W - face recognition not start and video freezes

    I apologize for my English.
    Nvidia 3D testing program wheel shots. The face recognition does not start.
    If on, the image activator 3D is disturbed and I do not see the image in 3D.
    If I try the Games 3D compatible (Left4Dead) activates the 3D in 1080p but the game is jerky as the test image 3D not activate the face recognition.
    3D play is to see in 2D photos into 3D but how do I vadere photos in 3D?
    If active 3D activator the image quality is poor.
    I did set both normal and advanced, but the videos have gost effects especially on the sides.

    Hi
    It looks your Qosmio F750-03W PQF75C-03W001 is an Toshiba Canadian model as I found this here:
    http://support.toshiba.ca/support/isg/center/en/index.asp?s1=Notebook&s2=Qosmio&s3=F750&s4=PQF75C-03W001
    First of all you should update the BIOS to the latest version (at this time it seems that BIOS 2.0 is the latest one).
    Also update the
    nVidia Display Driver version 8.17.12.9039
    Super-D IC Driver version 1.0.1613.809
    Toshiba Blu-ray Disc Player version 1.0.1.299
    as mentioned here http://support.toshiba.ca/support/isg/tsb/en/view.asp?docid=TSB001633
    if 3D stereo effects are not ok use the X-tune to calibrate this.
    You are recommended to use this utility to optimize the 3D stereo effects when using the Glasses-Free 3D function for the first time or being unsatisfied with the 3D effects.
    To operate the X-Tune utility, follow the steps as described below:
    1. Select the language and optimization mode, and then click OK. There are three optimization modes: Primary, Advanced and Professional. You can choose one based on your own experience.
    2. Sitting about 60cm away from your computer, click Start to continue.
    3. Follow the on-screen instructions on each step.
    4. Use the left or right arrow key on the keyboard to adjust the effect. When you are satisfied with the effect, click Enter and then an information window will appear on the screen. Press the ESC key on the keyboard to cancel the optimization procedure.
    5. Click Finish to close the X-Tune utility.
    You said your face recognition does not work properly so uninstall this software. Do this also with the webcam driver/software. After both tools has been uninstalled, clean registry using CCleaner and install both tools again using the newest version.
    Reboot and start the X-Tune again to calibrate the 3D effects.
    In the Toshiba doc (link posted above) you can find this notice:
    1. Set [Screen resolution] to 1920x1080. Glasses free 3D mode is not enabled except in 1920x1080 mode.
    2. Depending on game, it does not work with glasses free 3D mode and work with 2D mode.
    3. Depending on game, it is not displayed correctly with stereoscopic 3D mode
    4. Game is not displayed with glasses free 3D mode when running TOSHIBA Blu-ray Disc Player with glasses free 3D mode
    or running TOSHIBA Web Camera application.
    5. The performance of the game will be decreased when playing game with glasses free 3D mode. If the performance of the game is decreased dramatically, please decrease the quality of image of the game using settings
    of the game. If the performance of the game is still not enough, please disable glasses free 3D mode by unchecking [Enable stereoscopic 3D] at NVIDIA Control Panel.
    6. Small fonts in the games may be difficult to read with glasses free 3D mode. At that time, please push 3D button of PC and disable glasses free 3D mode temporarily. Glasses free 3D mode is enabled if you push 3D button again
    7. The response of the game may delay with glasses free 3D mode enabled. If you feel it and can not enjoy the game, please disable glasses free 3D mode by unchecking [Enable stereoscopic 3D] at NVIDIA Control Panel.
    8. Glasses free 3D mode can be disabled temporarily by pressing 3D button of PC but it may be enabled while playing game. At that time, please push 3D button and disable it again.
    9. When [Enable stereoscopic 3D] in NVIDIA Control Panel is unchecked, game will start with 2D mode. At this time, glasses free 3D mode is not enabled even if you pressed 3D button of PC while playing the game.
    10. Glasses free 3D mode may be enabled except TOSHIBA Blu-ray Disc Player and games. At this time, please disable glasses free 3D mode by unchecking [Enable stereoscopic 3D] at NVIDIA Control Panel.
    11. The color of video may be different from original when playing video with full screen mode on RGB and non 3D TV if [Enable stereoscopic 3D] is checked. At this time, please disable glasses free 3D mode by unchecking [Enable stereoscopic 3D] at NVIDIA Control Panel.
    Hope this helps.

  • Urgently require guidance for face recognition system

    I urgently require some guidance for developing a face recognition system.
    please tell me all the essential packages required for developing it...

    BalusC wrote:
    Tell your boss that he have to look for another developer.I guess I'd better shelve the thread requesting the code to help build and guide a small intercontinental thermonuclear device...

  • BUG: Face recognition data not saved to images.

    i have the option to automatically save XMP data into the images activated.
    so all keywords and metadata changes are not only saved to the catalog but also into my DNG and TIFF images.
    now this works fine for everything except the new face recognition data.
    i mean the areas (rectangles) where the faces are.
    i guess the problem is that the images already contain the keywords (names) of the persons in the images.
    what i did was using the rectangles to identify the persons in the images. drawing rectangles around their faces and name them.
    this info about the rectangle positions is NOT automatically stored in the image files. not after hours of letting LR run idle.
    this info is only stored when i manually save (CTRL+S) the images or do something other to the metadata (like adding NEW keywords to it).
    so in short:  just adding the face region data (the rectangles) will not trigger the automatic XMP save function when the name keyword was already asigned as keyword to the image.
    that´s very bad and must considered a bug in my opinion..
    i don´t like to rely on the LR catalog only. it´s unsave even with backups.
    i want that the metadata info is stored in the images.
    also when i give away my images i want that the metadata is in the images.
    that´s why "automatically save XMP" is always active and very important for me.

    I don't have any info but repost your original info at this site.  Supposedly Adobe reads this and it should not get lost in the clutter  I have posted a few bugs there and they were acknowledged but not fixed but Adobe seems to be pretty good at fixing potential data loss bugs/problems which I consider this to be if it is working as you describe.
    Photoshop Family Customer Community

  • Strange UI bug when using People view/face recognition

    I've started playing with the face recognition in LR6/CC and have encountered an odd display bug when viewing the groups of 'named people':
    The thumbnail for each named person includes a count of how many images (or perhaps that should be faces) are attributed to their specific name. However, once the number of images for a person exceeds 100, LR only displays the first two digits in the thumbnail and drops off the third one, e.g. 254 is displayed as 25. If you hover over the thumbnail, the full count (e.g. 254) is displayed so long as the mouse cursor is kept on the thumbnail. Interestingly, once the number of images attributed to a named person exceeds 1000, it does the same thing, only it adds an extra digit (so 1400 becomes 140).
    I'm running this on Win7.
    Anyone else seeing this?
    M

    I guess I was primarily "testing the water" to see if the problem was specific to my configuration in some way, but you make a fair point John.
    Here's my (possible) bug report: LIGHTROOM Facial recognition: thumbnails not displaying full number
    M

  • People and Face Recognition tags not showing up under People page after converting to PSE11

    Hi Forum
    Upgrade from PSE 10 to PSE 11
    Beware, having just spent over 3 hours using the face tagging feature in Elements 11 (because it does not use people tags from earlier versions to populate the new People Tab). I can only say the result was less than useless. I now have over 1200 images tagged with the wrong people and multiple wrong people at that. And worse still the person that should have been tagged is not there at all!
    I noticed that during the tagging process the image displayed to provide a name for is not the image when selecting full screen view - it actually displays another image. So my guess is it is not actually tagging the face you see but applying the tag to the image it actually thinks it is.
    Therefore the result is utter garbage.... What a waste of time and effort. Not happy at all. When will Adobe release working software, hard lesson learned here.
    Regards
    David
    Message title was edited by: Brett N

    Hi Andaleeb
    Yes this is definately frustrating - what should be a simple process during the upgrade from 10 to 11 is a painful manual task to correct afterwards.
    Okay I restored the catalogue which contained the original people tags. But because they were called named 'Family' they are not treated as People in People Tab. So I changed the name Family to People and then yes the images started to appear in the People Tab. But there are groups of people such as my wife and sons who are not imported into the People Tab because (I think) they are a sub level below me. So are ignored in People import process. Viewing images in Media View shows they are marked with a 'Group' icon but still these do not show up in People - Groups. The tags are shown when clicking 'Groups' but when selecting one shows the message 'no people exist in this group'. So how do i get them in? I can't find a way of changing the person concerned to have a non group tag like the other images that were recognised as people. I hope this makes sense.
    Help appreciated.
    Regards
    David

  • Duplicate Face recognition Boxes Possible Bug????

    I am having a heck of a time with face recognition and assigning a name to a face and then putting another box around the same face, telling me its unnamed. The boxes vary the slightest bit in size, I cant "x" out of the unnamed box, so I have to close the named box, then use the present unnamed box and re-type the name of the person into it. This is extremely time consuming and if the name is already present, I am not sure why Aperture is putting another unnamed box around the same face which is some cases is exactly the same size and others is differs my .5mm. Is there a way to turn this 2nd unnamed box off or to ideally remove the unnamed boxes from all the photos that have multiple naming boxes? Thanks in advance!
    Message was edited by: rhammerman
    Message was edited by: rhammerman

    Maybe try rebuilding the database by holding down option-command when starting Aperture. I had some issues with duplicates in Faces and rebuilding the library worked wonders.

  • PSE 8 Face Recognition and PSE5 "People" Tags

    I have a lot of photos tagged in Windows PSE5  Organizer.  I have recently upgraded to PSE8 and need to think about how to align the two.
    A simpliifed example: In my current catalog, I have two tags upder the tag category "People": Bert and Ernie.  Over the years, I have tagged pitures with both Bert and Ernie with both tags.   When I do a search on "Bert" I find pictures with just Bert and pictures with both Bert and Ernie.   This has been satisfactory.
    Now PSE8 is finding Bert's face and asking me "Who is this?" or "Is this Bert?"  It creates brand new "Bert" tags.  (And oddly, they are in a different namespace than my old Bert tags since I don't get a "duplicate tag name" message.)
    How should I align my old tags wtih the new? 
    * Should I only drag the new "Bert" tag on those pictures with only Bert in them?
    * Or can I drag the new Bert tag on pictures with both Bert and Ernie?
    I don't understand the technology well enough yet to know if it can get confused by the latter.

    The Who Is This box is part of the new face-tagging in PSE 8.  When you invoke Find > Find People For Tagging, it will let you tag individual faces with People tags via the Who Is This box.  When a face is tagged, that tag can still be used like the old People tags -- you can assign it other pics, you can search for all pics that have the tag, etc.  But the Find People For Tagging command will also show the face associated with the tag.
    For some people (including me), if you type the name of a pre-existing People tag exactly into the Who Is This Box, PSE will use it.  But some others have reported that PSE makes a new, duplicate tag in this case.  I don't know why.  (But it is clear that Adobe didn't really think through the issues of people with existing catalogs.)
    The Find People For Tagging command creates its tags immediately under the People category.  You can merge the old tag with the new tag by selecting the old tag in the Keyword Tags pane, Edit > Select All, dragging the new tag (created by the Find People command) to those photos, and then deleting the old tag.   In the Keyword Tags pane, you can drag the new tag anyhere you want in the tag heirarchy.

  • LRCC Face recognition - best practices?

    Ok so we are all new to the wonderful world of face recognition in LR.  I'm trying to work out what would be the best practices for using this.
    A little bit of background - I have a catalog of over 200,000 images.  In addition to portrait and wedding clients, a significant part of my work is with models and another significant part of my work is theatre photography.  I have be wanting some sort of face recognition to help with both for some time.
    What are your namining conventions for people? - here's mine:
    Ideally I would label people as "surname, firstname" so that I can keep members of a family together in "named people" display, but commas are not allowed in names.  Also the professional name of many models doesn't fit that pattern eg "Strawberry Venom" or "Cute as Sin" are to models I have worked with.
    I am trying to come up with a sensible naming convention at the moment it is "Surname/ Firstname" for clients, theatre folk and friends/family.  Models are still a problem, at present I am thinking of "Surname/ Firstname (model name(s))"  While I may not be able to remember the real names of models, I do usually know the names from model releases.  This naming will still permit me to filter/find them in the keyword List panel by just entering the model name.
    On final addition I am making to this this naming convention is the use of a hashtag suffix to the name:  #F for friends and family, #C for clients, #T for theatre/actors and #M for models.  This enables me to filter on just models, or just actors, or just friends and familiy.  Where people fall into multiple categories I add multiple hashtags.  So photos of me would be keyworded with "Butterfield/ Ian #F #T"
    Unknown / unidentified people.
    What I am not yet certain about is how to handle unknown / unidentified people.  Unidentified people fall into a number of different categories.
    People I don't know and I am never likely to know (Eg random strangers on the street, local tour guides on holiday, random people in the background etc)
    This group is relatively easy to deal with - that is to simply delete the face recognition, End of story.
    People I don't know the names of yet but I am likely to find out (Eg actors in a production for which I don't have a programme)
    For these people I am making up a unique name using the format "date/ Context-Gendernn" Eg an unknown male actor at Stockport Garrick Theatre would be named as "20150313/ SGT-M01"  Although this may appear a complex solution it has a number of advantages.  If/when I do learn the name of the individual (Eg I photograph them in a different production) it is simply a case of renaming the people keyword.  Creating a unique name and not simple assigning all unknowns to a bucket name will help the face recognition algorithms find this person without it being confused by have different faces assigned to the same name. I am also using the hashtage #U to make it easier to filter the unknown faces when I need to.
    People I don't know the names of and there is only a slim possibility of meeting/photographing again (Eg guests as a client weeding)
    It feels as though I out to just delete the face recognition and have done with it, and this is what I would do except for thing. Other than manually drawing face regions I have not yet found a way to get lightroom to rescan a folder for faces if you have previously deleted the face recognition.  This means that deleting face regions from a large number of people is something that cannot be easily reversed.  I might just leave these people in the "Unnamed People" category... at lease until such time as there is a way to rescan a folder or colectoin.
    Summary
    My practices are still evolving. But I hope these thoughts and idea will help others think through the issues and come up with solutions that work for their situation.  I am interested in hearing how other people are using the face recognition system.  Especially if anyone is aware of any 'best practices' that Adobe or anyone else has recommended.

    Glad it helped.
    Yes and no.  You can still put the people keywords into hierarchies within the keyword list - you can arrange them just like any other keywords.so you just create a "smith family" keyword and store "john smith" under it.  What you can't do is apply BOTH smith family and john smith the the same face.
    My use of the hash tags came about because I initially had a top level keyword for models, one for clients, one for theatre peple and one for family and firends.  Then discovered that some of the theatre folk were also clients (headshots) and what to do when a friend is also a client.  So the hash tag system means a person can be both a friend, a model, an actor as well as being a client!  (#T #C #M #F).

  • Advanced Sort, Filter (color, image size), DUPLICATES, face recognition, GUI customizeability

    Hi,
    here are some of my Lightroom Feature Requests (maybe later more):
    - Filter based on image size. Example: show me all photos with a resolution of 1600x1200 or less.
    - More complex filtering. Example: show me all photos from the Collection A that are tagged with keyword 'k1' and 'k2' but not with keyword 'k3' and that are in the date range d1-d2 and were made with camera model X.
    - Automatic portrait/human face recognition
    - Sort and filter by color! Example: show me all photos that are mostly green (blue, yellow, red, ...)
    - Intelligent recognition and optional deletion of duplicates. Calculate some kind of fingerprint for each photo (file size won't do I guess) so that it will be possible to recognize duplicates EVEN if they are of different image resolution or orientation (landscape, portrait), i.e. really based on CONTENT of the image!
    - Make the components in the side panels movable so that the user can arrange his/her own panel with the components he uses most and on that side of the screen where he wants it.
    Besides that: I LOVE Lightroom. A GREAT product!! Use it A LOT!
    Nice greetings from Germany,
    Stefan.

    I second that.
    "More complex filtering. Example: show me all photos from the Collection A that are tagged with keyword 'k1' and 'k2' but not with keyword 'k3' and that are in the date range d1-d2 and were made with camera model X."
    This should be relatively easy to do. Most other DAMs in the market, e.g. ACDSee, do have this feature. It doesn't really becomes a real database until you have this feature.
    "Intelligent recognition and optional deletion of duplicates."
    Another great feature in ACDSee. Somehow it finds duplicates, even if filenames and dates are different, shows the different photos and gives you an option on what to do.

  • How does Aperture Face recognition work

    Just upgraded to Aperture 3 --- I'm a little baffled by the functionality of the face recognition. Aperture certainly found most (if not all) of the faces in my collection but I thought it was supposed to be able to actually do recognition (to some extent) so that when I associate a certain face with a name, it would automatically find the same face in other photos and mark them.
    I am not seeing any evidence that this actually happens --- I just seem to keep getting fed faces along the bottom that I have to name manually, even if it's a very similar picture that was already seen.
    What am I missing?

    I've noticed that sometimes (seems like all the time, but I've only done a few imports) when I first import new photos it can take a long time before Aperture decides to search for similar faces.
    I can tag a few pics of people in the "Faces View" and then double-click their photo to try to see suggested matches, but watching the "Activity Window" shows no searching for similar faces... I don't know what's stopping it, but it just doesn't seem to even bother searching for quite some time. It's not that it's still detecting faces in the photos (I've checked to see it's finished doing that) — there's nothing in the Activity Window and the CPU usage of Aperture is basically zero. Memory is not full, nothing else is using the CPU, it's just sitting there doing nothing...
    And then randomly, suddenly, it seems to remember that it is meant to search for similar faces and does so...
    Would be interested to see if others are having similar behaviour, where Aperture just doesn't even bother searching until some event, or some time after importing... Open up the Activity window in Aperture (from the Window menu), double-click on a face in the faces view and see if it starts searching for similar faces... if it's not even searching, then that might explain why you're not being given the ability to match faces. If it is searching, then I guess it's just not finding anything. Also note that you won't get any matches until the search finishes (it can take quite a while to search through the photos for similar faces; likely depends on (and is slowed down by) the number of faces for that person, the number of 'unknown faces', the total number of faces and/or people in your library)

Maybe you are looking for