Bug: multiple tracks with Matrix Reverb causes static on playback

Some of my .bands I developed under an earlier GB sound atrocious under the latest '08 (v4.1.2) -- if I have more than one real instrument track using my Matrix reverb preset, the playback of the second track has static (not subtle at all... clearly a software issue). The track sounded fine when recording it with the same effect on, but the playback is extremely smurfy. I can deselect the effect on the second track and the static disappears (that is, it was clearly not part of the dry track recording).
Do others see this or similar issues?

this has been mentioned by more than a couple of people, unfortunately.
you might try using another reverb plug-in:
http://www.bulletsandbones.com/GB/PluginsAUEffects.html

Similar Messages

Moving multiple tracks with volume changes

I'm sure this has been addressed but I can't find it here - I have multiple tracks in Garageband 9. I can move multiple tracks but any volume adjustments do not move with them. Is it possible to move tracks and volume adjustments together? For instance if I shorten the first track how can I move all the other tracks and volume adjustments related to those tracks at once without having to reset every volume curve point?

dcappe wrote:
Is it possible to move tracks and volume adjustments together?
http://www.bulletsandbones.com/GB/GBFAQ.html#lockautomation
(Let the page FULLY load. The link to your answer is at the top of your screen)

Cracks with matrix reverb on intel macpro

I use matrix reverb on G4 and G5 without problem. since i am on intel macpro, there are crackles with the matrix reverb.
Do you have an idea ?

Hi,
I never use that plugin,I use Logic's Space Designer...
Maybe Apple knows why it crackles on an Intel machine,ask them please...

BUGS: Multiple Undos with Single CMD-Z (and other buggy tales)

BUG #1:
In the SIDs thread (now locked) I said in response to Logic Pro Help, "Hey, after all, Logic ain't that bad". Today I've changed my mind.
In full view of my writing partner, we witnessed numerous times that Logic would undo multiple edits after hitting CMD-Z just once. I've reported this in numerous other threads I've started here on the Apple Forum. I've posted Feedback about it. Naturally, there's been no response from the company.
BUG#2a: we tried to troubleshoot why certain SMPTE-locked regions would unlock (using a key command) and other locked regions on the same MIDI track would unlock.
BUG#2b: while checking to see whether my key command for Unlock SMPTE Position was still intact or not, I went to the key command window and hit cntrl-opt-cmd-U (custom assignment) expecting that the assigned command would scroll into view in the KC window. But I should have known better --- this is one of those key combinations which will NOT cause the assigned command to scroll into view. Sure enough, entering the word "SMPTE" in the search window caused the display to show the Unlock SMPTE Postion command. So why does pressing some keys/key combinations in the KC window show the assigned command while some do not?
And we're supposed to be OK with this kind of behavior?

Hey Cozmicone,
Yes I have done that - I mapped CMD + Z but that kind of gets in the way of years of habit and is a bit frustrating and confusing when you're working quick etc...
It does work fine doing that (I have just uninstalled 3 versions of Photoshop and reinstalled CC 2014 and still no multiple undos on OPT + CMD + Z?! It's like it won't accept the key combination because if you go into map back to OPT + CMD + Z after changing it to CMD + Z it won't let you. You have to revert to default to even get that option back. C'est bizarre...non?

Selecting Multiple Objects with Output Preview Causing Problems

I'm trying to edit a PDF and need to select multiple objects. Without Output Preview open, I can easily select all the items I need using the shift key. With Output Preview open, whenever I try to select the second object, Output Preview creates a sticky note, instead of selecting the second object.
I am also using the PitStop Pro plug-in.
Any idea how to correct this problem? Thanks!

Unfortunately it seems that the new sticky note feature with the output preview in Acrobat XI uses the same keyboard shortcut as multiple selection tool in Pitstop (shift).
Closing the output preview is the easiest way to get around this issue.
We could consider changing the key for multiple selection in PitStop, but 'shift' is pretty much a default, so what could we change it too?
If anyone has any thoughts could they email me, I am the product manager responsible for Pitstop at Enfocus and my email is '[email protected]'
All feedback gratefully received.

Can you do multiple tracks with soundbooth?

I have been trying to mix some sounds together but i can 't seem to find how to mix more than one tracks? Or do i use another programe for that?

Hi Chad,
The CS3 release of Soundbooth consists of an asset editor only. There are some features that enable the mixing of multiple sounds, such as mix paste, but there is no hidden full-featured multi-track environment.
Durin

How can I export an audio track with just the effect signal without the audio?

I want to export dry audio tracks and their effects signals as separate tracks. For instance a track with a reverbed snare would be one track with the dry snare and one with just the reverb.
I know from people who use Reason that it's just a box you need to tick, but I'm struggling to find out how to do it in Logic. Surely it must be a way?

I don't remember Reason being that straight forward, but the obvious way to go, is to mute all sends and bounce.
Then solo the reverb channel, in aux, checking it isn't shared by other sources, and bounce. You should have a dry and a reverbed signal, at your convenience.

[svn] 949: Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name , it causes a ClassCastException in the server

Revision: 949
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-27 07:12:59 -0700 (Thu, 27 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name, it causes a ClassCastException in the server
QA: Yes - try again with legacy-collection true and false.
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Details: Another try in fixing this bug. When legacy-collection is false, Actionscript Array on the client becomes Java Array on the server and my fix yesterday assumed this case. However, when legacy-collection is true, Actionscript Array becomes Java ArrayList on the server. So added code to handle this case.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-96
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/proxy/src/java/flex/messaging/services/http/proxy/RequestF ilter.java

Hi all!
Just to post the solution to this if anyone ever runs accross this thread...
For some reason i had it bad the first time, don't have time right now to see why but here is what worked for me:
HashMap primaryFile = new HashMap();
primaryFile.put("fileContent", bFile);
primaryFile.put("fileName", uploadedFile.getFilename());
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("primaryFile", primaryFile);
HashMap customDocMetadata = new HashMap();
HashMap [] properties = new HashMap[1];
HashMap customMetadataPropertyRoom = new HashMap();
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("name", "xRoom");
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("value", "SOME ROOM");
properties[0] = customMetadataPropertyRoom;
customDocMetadata.put("property", properties);
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("CustomDocMetaData", customDocMetadata);
Basically an unbounded wsdl type is an array of objects (HashMaps), makes sense, i thought i had it like this before, must have messed up somewhere...
Good luck all!

[svn] 931: Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name , it causes a ClassCastException in the server

Revision: 931
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-03-26 11:31:01 -0700 (Wed, 26 Mar 2008)
Log Message:
Bug: BLZ-96 - When sending a HttpService request from ActionScript with multiple headers with the same name, it causes a ClassCastException in the server
QA: Yes - we need automated tests for this basic case.
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Details: RequestFilter was not handling multiple headers with the same name properly.
Ticket Links:
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/BLZ-96
Modified Paths:
blazeds/branches/3.0.x/modules/proxy/src/java/flex/messaging/services/http/proxy/RequestF ilter.java

Hi all!
Just to post the solution to this if anyone ever runs accross this thread...
For some reason i had it bad the first time, don't have time right now to see why but here is what worked for me:
HashMap primaryFile = new HashMap();
primaryFile.put("fileContent", bFile);
primaryFile.put("fileName", uploadedFile.getFilename());
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("primaryFile", primaryFile);
HashMap customDocMetadata = new HashMap();
HashMap [] properties = new HashMap[1];
HashMap customMetadataPropertyRoom = new HashMap();
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("name", "xRoom");
customMetadataPropertyRoom.put("value", "SOME ROOM");
properties[0] = customMetadataPropertyRoom;
customDocMetadata.put("property", properties);
operationBinding.getParamsMap().put("CustomDocMetaData", customDocMetadata);
Basically an unbounded wsdl type is an array of objects (HashMaps), makes sense, i thought i had it like this before, must have messed up somewhere...
Good luck all!

How do you setup a send to a track with multiple effects?

I am just learning how to mix and master songs as well as using Adobe Audition and was wonder if it was possible to allow a track to have multiple sends on them, Lets say one send containing Reverb on one bus, then another send applied to the same track containg delay thus allwoing me to controll idependently how hard the two seperate affects will contribute to the mix.

Audition allows you to have up to 16 sends on each track with a separate level control on each. And you can set up a bus track for each containing it's own effects rack. If you really want to you can use any one of the sixteen sends from a bus to another bus or to the master track.

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

[svn:fx-trunk] 21141: Bug: 2780176 - Logging and logging out multiple times in LCDS can cause duplicate session detected errors .

Revision: 21141
Revision: 21141
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-04-26 06:40:39 -0700 (Tue, 26 Apr 2011)
Log Message:
Bug: 2780176 - Logging and logging out multiple times in LCDS can cause duplicate session detected errors.
QA: Yes
Doc: No
Checkintests: Pass
Details: When a logout was followed by an immediate login, sometimes the server would throw duplicate session detected errors. This was because when logout happened, a fire-and-forget disconnect message was sent to the server that established a new session, and if the subsequent login happened before disconnect ACK returned from the server, that would establish another session and hence the error. The fix is to insert a slight delay between disconnect and ResultEvent dispatching. This way, disconnect has a chance to return before a login is performed.
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/rpc/src/mx/messaging/ChannelSet.as

You've got an incompatible Logitech driver and java was incompletely uninstalled.
You may have a problem with the Wacom driver.
I don't know if fixing those things will help.
There also a few window server errors, but I don't know if they are causal.
If you can note the time of the hangs, that might help narrow it down in the logs.

Looping a video track with escape -- Bug or Pilot error?

[The next 2 paragraphs are a repeat of my previous post. I'm including them for context.]
I'm working in DVDSP 4 and have encountered a few "anomalies". I wanted to see if I am doing something wrong or if I have found a bug. I will break this into two posts because they are two different issues.
Basically I am creating a DVD that will back a live presentation. The video track is timed to approximate the length of the presentation. But I want to have several "escape hatches". If a segment does run a little long then the presentation will dump into another track that has a still image and a background music track. I don't want to pause the play, because I want full-field video and audio. I also want to advance through the presentation by simply clicking the NEXT CHAPTER button.
[/End repeated section]
So the other problem with looping a still on a video track is escaping the loop. I've set this track's END JUMP to go to the "Chapter 1" marker of the current video program. (It's the only marker on the this timeline.) I've targeted the "Next Chapter" button to return me to my main timeline. Whether I simulate OR burn this DVD program I get the same results. The playhead does not jump tracks. Instead it returns to the start of the current timeline and begins playing again.
Is this supposed to happen? DVDSP lets me assign all these actions, and the manual and support seems to indicate this should work, but it doesn't. Not sure if this is a bug, a problem with the DVD spec, or simply my lack of knowledge. (please help)

Houghts & Aldershot -- thanks for your reply. To add a little clarity the project goes like this:
The MAIN track is 20 minutes long. If the speaker finishes a section early, he can "NEXT" to the next section (next marker). If he runs long, when he gets to the next marker the dvd will dump him into another track (Lets call it WAITING TRACK) that will "hold" (with some music) until he hits NEXT again. So far this all works.
The problem is getting OUT of the WAITING TRACK loop and back to the MAIN track. Putting a second marker near the end of this track (as Aldershot suggests) will jump me to the end of WAITING but how do I get back to the marker in MAIN? Can I just set an end Jump to go back to the marker I want in MAIN? Will the presenter then have to hit skip forward twice? (I guess I'll have to try and see.)
I guess I could target this marker in main with the MENU button, but then the presenter would have TWO buttons to worry about. I'm trying to make this as zipless as possible.
By the way, if I don't loop the WAITING track back to the first marker, this scenario works. The problem only arises if I loop back to Chapter1. Making the end of the track an infinite hold looked to be a promising option. But it seems to put the player into pause. The user must hit PLAY and then NEXT. Two buttons again.
I'll keep digging and follow up as I learn more.

Multiple Thumb Slider with Multiple Track Colors

Hi All,
Does any one implemented a Multiple Thumb Slider component with Multiple Track Colors. Please find the screen shot of the component below which I am talking about.
Any ideas or any link or sample source of code given would be highly appreciated.
If I drag any thumb the colored section between any two thumbs should increase or decrease.
Thanks,
Bhasker

Hi,
There is a sort of workaround I made myself. Basically you set up your slider into a canvas container and add new boxes exactly at the position between your thumb buttons, in order to imitate your 'tracks'. Look the image below and notice that the black tracks are in fact VBoxes. For different colors, make each VBox different backgroundColor style.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<mx:Application xmlns:mx="http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml">
   <mx:Script>
          <![CDATA[
      import mx.containers.VBox;
      var tracks : Array = [];
      public function changeSliderHandler(event : Event) : void {
         for (var i : int = 0,j : int = 0; i < tracks.length; i++) {
            var track : VBox = tracks[i] as VBox;
            track.setStyle('left', slider.getThumbAt(j++).xPosition + 3);
            track.setStyle('right', slider.width - slider.getThumbAt(j++).xPosition + 3);
      public function addTrackHandler(event : Event) : void {
         var track : VBox = new VBox();
         track.setStyle('backgroundColor', '#000000');
         track.width = 0;
         track.height = 2;
         track.setStyle('bottom', '7');
         tracks.push(track);
         canvas.addChild(track);
         slider.values = slider.values.concat(0, 0);
         slider.thumbCount += 2;
          ]]>
    </mx:Script>
   <mx:Panel title="My Slider" height="95%" width="95%"
             paddingTop="5" paddingLeft="5" paddingRight="5" paddingBottom="5">
      <mx:Canvas id="canvas" borderStyle="solid" height="40" width="100%">
         <mx:HSlider id="slider" minimum="0" maximum="100" thumbCount="2"
                     change="changeSliderHandler(event)" values="{[0,0]}" showTrackHighlight="false"
                     percentWidth="100" snapInterval="1" tickInterval="1"
                     allowThumbOverlap="true" showDataTip="true" labels="{[0, 50, 100]}"/>
         <mx:VBox id="track1" backgroundColor="#000000" width="0" height="2" bottom="7" initialize="{tracks.push(track1)}"/>
      </mx:Canvas>
      <mx:Button label="Add track" click="addTrackHandler(event)"/>
   </mx:Panel>
</mx:Application>

Multiple tracks in one matrix window

can anyone tell me how to get midi data from multiple tracks to show up in a single matrix window for editing?

wow. cool trick.
but it would be more helpful to me if i could select a few tracks... for example.. kick,snare,hihat, and bass. then open those 4 tracks in one matrix window. then the editing of those tracks would be very intuitive because of their relation to each other. is this possible?
ps.- why are so many things in logic "cool tricks?" I wonder if i can buy a secret book of Logics "cool tricks" at masonic temple or maybe from a wandering member of the knights templar.

Bug: multiple tracks with Matrix Reverb causes static on playback

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for