Build time in Robohelp 8

Hi all,
I've been playing around with the trial version of RH8 before
making the upgrade from version 7, and after importing my project
the main thing I've noticed is that it takes a lot longer to
generate my primary layout (webhelp), and it seems to be spending
most of it's time building the search...
I can see that the search facility has been greatly modified
and it looks better, but it does seem to take a long long time to
generate builds in this version... roughly 30 mins where it was 5
mins or less in v7.
My project has around 700 pages, and have not yet assigned
any of the new "search keywords" (just added one to test it out)...
Windows XP SP2 (I know!! corporate managed environment!!), Core 2
Duo 1.8GHz, 1GB RAM, running from C drive, not in source
control...

Hi there
Where is your project located? Is it by chance on a network drive? If so, close things down, copy it to your C drive and try again. You will probably be astonished at the speed difference.
Networks and RoboHelp project files are like trying to mix oil and water. WebHelp OUTPUT is fine on a network. But you don't want to open RoboHelp and then browse to a project on a network and make edits.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

Similar Messages

Usage dependency is created at Build time and installation time

Hi,
The infrastructure guys have selected the usage dependency as Build time and Installation time, while creating software components.
"Y" SWC is created as depedency for "X" software component.
In SLD(software catalog), we are able to view the Y component as dependency in X component(at both build time and installation time). In usage dependency we are able to view Y component but when we click Y component in usage dependecy we are also able to view X component. Is there any problem with this ?
There is another issue. we are able to view basis object(in IR) in Y component but not in X component. Actually as per the above configuration basis object in IR should appear in X component.
Please refer to another forum which may give you some more idea.("BPM - Message interfaces of one component are not appearing in another comp") pasted on 17 Nov,2006.
Please could you provide us the inputs.
Thanks,
Ramesh

hi,
as you see per my weblog try choosing Installation Time
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/08/26/xi-are-you-independentfrom-your-dependencies
more about it on:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/d4/8d784289b4de54e10000000a155106/content.htm
Regards,
michal
<a href="/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/06/28/xipi-faq-frequently-asked-questions"><b>XI / PI FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions</b></a>

How can you build time series measures in OBIEE without using TODATE AGO fu

How can you build time series measures in OBIEE without using TODATE and AGO function?
Please provide steps to build time series
measures in OBIEE without using TODATE and
AGO function. Dashboard results not storing
in cache when using TODATE and AGO functions.
eventhough its cached users queries not
hitting cache because queries doesn't match
exact date time when using TODATE and AGO
functions. so I want to build queries using
sysdate and some simple calculations. Please
send your inputs/ideas for my questions..
Thanks in Advance

This can be using Msum function in answers. Use the following formula, here dollars is my metric. Change the formula based on your metric.
Msum("Sales Measures".Dollars ,2) - "Sales Measures".Dollars
the report will be cached and better performed compared with time series. check ti
- Madan Thota

How can I change default build time from 1 sec to .5 sec?

Whenever I create a build, the default time is 1 sec. I'd like it to be .5 sec. I use a blank master slide. How can I change the default build time for all slides? Or can I?

I'm sorry, but Apple does not provide a downgrade path for iOS. Because downgrading is unsupported by Apple we cannot discuss it on these forums, but you can use Google to find information on how to install an older version of iOS on any iDevice.

Flex 4.5 Build Times

We are building a Flex 4.5 application using the pure MVC framework. We use the Apache Subversion SVN server for source code control (and ant for building). When we do a build of the project the build time can vary between 30 seconds and 15 minutes! Can anyone cast any light on why this might be, as you can imagine it is having quite a negative impact on our productivity! There does not seem to be any pattern to this and is common to all the machines on our network. Any help would be hugely appreciated!

OK
I found it project>properties add a device
KBn

Tips on how to speed up preview/debug build time?

I am building an air2.5 application and I am still learning the finer details of Flash.
Our project has a number of images and sounds, and the file size is starting to get up there, but nothing that we are worried about for our end product.
However, every time I try to run the program by using CTRL+Enter or CTRL+SHIFT+Enter (which I use ALOT), it takes FOREVER to "exporting SWF movie" (like 3 minutes every time) and I suspect as the project continues to grow and more assets are added, it will get signfigantly worse.
I've tried to disable the "compress move" option in the publish settings, but it made no difference.
All my images and sounds have been setup as classes so i can reference them through my as files and flash code, I rarely do anything "on the stage". Alost all my sounds are wav files (for the moment) and the images are PNG's (as I need the alpha channels)
The only thing that I was able to think of is making the graphics and sound assets in some kind of pre-compiled library that doesn't have to get compressed and compiled every tiem I try to debug, only I haven't a clue how to do that, or if it's possible.
Does anyone know of any ways to improve the build time for debugging and such?
Or anyone have any tips and tricks/do's and don'ts when it comes to this kind of thing?
Thanks.

the SWC thing may be exactly what I need.
I read that link you gave me and I will definately do a little more research on SWC, even if it's not completely clear how to use them at this particular moment.
let's say I have an image called MyImage.png which I have setup to export for actionscript on frame 1 and the class is called "MyImage"
Assume I have the same thing setup in my library for a sound file called "MySound"
Now, without doing any reading first, I would assume that I would create a new fla file, put those 2 assets in said fla's library and then compile that fla into an swc? And then access thoughs assets in my main project by importing the swc into it? or it is more simple than that?
Cheers
Dave

Minimize WLW build time?

Hi!
Is it possible to get Workshop only to build elements that actually has changed
on the file system? In regular ant you typically achieve this by using the timestamp
mechanisms.
This would greatly decrease the build time, and thereby increase the WLW user
experience significantly!
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Vidar Moe

hi,
Thank you Dhanya, so if i get it right it's possible to have zero down time during setup and initialization with this method :
1. delete data in infoprividers in BW
2. Delete setup tables and delta queues in R/3.
2. Run init from BW with no data transfer (supposition: this will setup delta queues).
3. Run setup tables filling in R/3 (supposition: all documents posted while this operation is going on will be stored in delta queues)
4. Run full repair load in BW
5. Run delta load in BW.
is this right?
how about compression with and without marker update mentioned here? [https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f83be790-0201-0010-4fb0-98bd7c01e328|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f83be790-0201-0010-4fb0-98bd7c01e328]
we are using first scenario : Inventory management with non-cumulative key figures.
Thank you.

Which dc and sc should add in build time form sld when integration uwl

hi
i have to create a webdynpro to show info from uwl, like follow
IUWLService uwlService=(IUWLService)PortalRuntime.getRuntimeResources().getService(IUWLService.ALIAS_KEY);
but i don't know which dc and sc i should add in build time form sld and use it.
i try add UWLJWF from sld, and ?
i develop with nwce ehp1
thank you

1) tc/je/security/api
2) tc/je/usermanagement/api
from ENGFACADE.
3) tc/kmc/bc.uwl/api
from UWLJWF

Build time

Is there a way to change the default build speed? All builds open with 1 second and I prefer .5 second.

j.d.darcy wrote:
Robert.Bossy wrote:
This is a couple of yes/no questions to confirm that I got it right. I'm in the context of build-time annotation processing where the AnnotationProcessor analyses each specified annotated class as well as their ancestors.
Let's assume barClassType is a com.sun.mirror.type.ClassType instance representing the type named foo.Bar.
Would barClassType.getDeclaration() return a non-null ClassDeclaration instance,
even though: foo.Bar was not specified when the annotation processing tool was invoked,
provided that: foo.Bar can be found somewhere in the class path?Yes.
If so, let's assume barDeclaration was assigned to the said return value and Qux is an annotation type.
Would barDeclaration.getAnnotation(Qux.class) return a non-null Annotation instance,
provided that: the Qux retention policy was set to either Retention.CLASS or Retention.RUNTIME?If the Bar type declaration included the Qux annotation (either directly or by annotation inheritance), yes.Yeah, that was implicit. Thanks a lot.

Extremely long build times using object oriented code

We have a LabVIEW application that we need to build an .exe for distrubution purposes. The application relies on several object-oriented classes for data handling and dynamic dispatch type casting and function selection. Currently it takes approximately 1.5 hours to build the application and it seems that most of the time is spent processing the object oriented files. Has anyone else seen this issue and are there any creative ways to improve the build times?

Hi again. We are still having issues using LVOOP due to extrmely long .exe build times as well as long labview loading times. I traced the source of this to one class hierarchy, shown below. This hierarchy also relies heavily on overriding top-level functions, declared as virtual VIs in the top level class, which I suspect contributes to this problem. While debugging another issue, I was trying to build a small piece of my main code into an .exe to verify its functionality and experienced the same extremely long build times. When I removed this class hierarchy from the VI, it built extremely fast. Also to be clear, I am using neither the mean function or Mean.vi anywhere in this set of code. To date we have been delighted with LVOOP and how it has made our code cleaner, mroe robust, and more maintanable. However, when creating new functionality in the code we often elect NOT to create new objects (even though they would be beneficial) because we are hesitant to introduce the extra time (load and build) required for LabVIEW to handle these classes. If our entire system was rewritten in LVOOP, I would suspect that it would become unmaintainable and unbuildable due to the LVOOP overhead. I was hoping that LV2009 would address some of these issues but, alas, it did not. Still looking for a way to improve this and thanks in advance for all of the replies.

Build-time access to declarations and annotations

This is a couple of yes/no questions to confirm that I got it right. I'm in the context of build-time annotation processing where the AnnotationProcessor analyses each specified annotated class as well as their ancestors.
Let's assume barClassType is a com.sun.mirror.type.ClassType instance representing the type named foo.Bar.
Would barClassType.getDeclaration() return a non-null ClassDeclaration instance,
even though: foo.Bar was not specified when the annotation processing tool was invoked,
provided that: foo.Bar can be found somewhere in the class path?
If so, let's assume barDeclaration was assigned to the said return value and Qux is an annotation type.
Would barDeclaration.getAnnotation(Qux.class) return a non-null Annotation instance,
provided that: the Qux retention policy was set to either Retention.CLASS or Retention.RUNTIME?

j.d.darcy wrote:
Robert.Bossy wrote:
This is a couple of yes/no questions to confirm that I got it right. I'm in the context of build-time annotation processing where the AnnotationProcessor analyses each specified annotated class as well as their ancestors.
Let's assume barClassType is a com.sun.mirror.type.ClassType instance representing the type named foo.Bar.
Would barClassType.getDeclaration() return a non-null ClassDeclaration instance,
even though: foo.Bar was not specified when the annotation processing tool was invoked,
provided that: foo.Bar can be found somewhere in the class path?Yes.
If so, let's assume barDeclaration was assigned to the said return value and Qux is an annotation type.
Would barDeclaration.getAnnotation(Qux.class) return a non-null Annotation instance,
provided that: the Qux retention policy was set to either Retention.CLASS or Retention.RUNTIME?If the Bar type declaration included the Qux annotation (either directly or by annotation inheritance), yes.Yeah, that was implicit. Thanks a lot.

The Building Installer with Robohelp

I am using RoboHelp for HTML version 8
So, the build engineers and others are wondering if there is not some way to cut down on the number of files or reduce the compiled help to a single file. Apparently, with chm files they just had to account for a single file. But they regard the current process as quite complicated, since they have to put lines in the installer for each of the Robohelp files, of which there may be over a 100 depending on the number of topics, etc. Is there some way I can help them out?

Hi there
If you are generating WebHelp, you really do need to consider ALL the output files to be needed. But that's only if you really want your help to function under all circumstances.
Note that it should be possible for your developers to use wildcards to specify files. This means that instead of painfully adding entry after entry of this.htm and that.htm and theother.htm, they specify *.htm and all files in the folder would be included.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

Very Slow Build Time

Hi All,
Just wondering if anyone had any advice on what steps I could follow to try and solve a very slow build I have for one of my DVDs I'm making. It has completed 20% and it has been running for about 28 hours.
Here are my project details:
- 1 best quality compressor encoded m2v video track (45min length)
- 1 ac3 audio track
- 6 menus with motion .motn project files as the background
- 1 track (hosts the video and audio)
Any ideas on what I could try to solve this slow build I would be very grateful. I haven't had slow build problems with other DVDs before. It is slowly building the DVD, it hasn't crashed, and it is taking up processor power.

Hi
6 menus with motion .motn project files as the background
These items must be taking all the encoding time. They must be rendered and MPEG2 encoded by DVDSP.
Are they very complex and long animations?
The mpeg2 and ac3 files are already encoded and DVDSP will just mux them in the final files; that don't take so long !!
Hope that helps !
Alberto

Converting Report Builder time-based metrics in Excel

I am having trouble with my time-based metrics (avg. time spent) when I pull it in using Report Builder. Excel seems to take it out of the HH:MM:SS format and makes it a number. So when I run a report with the Avg Time Spent metric in the Adobe Interface, the correct format is displayed but when I run it with Report Builder a random number is displayed. I can't seem to convert it to the correct time. Can anyone help?

Hi
I've just resolved a similar problem in Visual Studio whereby I had created a matrix with several columns and wanted to show each column as an overall percentage of each row.
It wasn't in sharepoint, but it may give you an idea of where to look to help you resolve this issue?
Basically, you have to tell the formula which set of data you want to add together to use as the number to do the divison by:
For example:
          |Column1| Column 2 | Column 3 |
Row 1 |     10    |     10       |     10       |
Row 2 |     10    |      10      |     20       |
If we assume we want to add the numbers in row 1 and show them as a percentage, we would expect to see 33% across all columns. In row 2, we would expect to see 25%, 25% and 50%. The formula to do this is:
Sum(Field)/Sum(Field,"RowGroupName")
It works in Visual Studio in a report matrix - hope it helps point you in the right direction for Sharepoint?
Regards
Kaz

Build-time Warning for EJB DC: Package is not reserved

Hi,
I have created an EJB DC and added a session bean into it.
Now while building I am getting following warning :-
Checking package reservation
Warning: Package com.vendor.we_kmapi.sessionbeans.kmopbessionbean is not reserved for DC : lda/sclda/we_kmapi.
Package reservation check finished in 0 seconds
How do I get read of this warning?
Please help.
Thanks and regards,
Amey Mogare

Hi Amey,
I think you need to reserve name in SLD by using Name Reservation. Please try it in SLD and try to build you project.
[Name Reservation |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/df/2761930dd9b74a85198f9e48850046/frameset.htm]
Hope it helps
Regards
Arun

Build time in Robohelp 8

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for