Bulk put away strategy

Hi Experts,
I have a question regarding bin search in Bulk Putaway strategy following are the settings for my bulk st sectioning and storage bin search
wh                st type        St bin type      SUT              blk st indi       stacks       stack height      No SUs
113     425     A0     EP     X3     1     3     3
113     425     A1     EP     X3     2     3     6
113     425     A2     EP     X3     4     3     12
113     425     A3     EP     X3     6     3     18
113     425     A4     EP     X3     8     3     24
113     425     A5     EP     X3     10     3     30
113     425     A6     EP     X3     12     3     36
113     425     A7     EP     X3     14     3     42
113     425     A8     EP     X3     16     3     48
113     425     A9     EP     X3     18     3     54
St bin type search
113 EP----->           A2   D3   A9 A3 A0     A1
I have bins (all of them in same st section) in 425 st type for all bin types now if i try to putaway a material (having X3 in material master) where would the system look to propose a bin ? I am seeing that system is picking bins with bin type A1 and i was expecting it to pick A9 as per st bin type search (there is no bin with A0)

Hi
Pls check the following:-
1. Pls deactivate the capacity check if you have activated.
2. at most, one partila pallet qnty in addition to the full storage units.
3. dont activate Mixed storage.
4. It is not absolutely necessary to activate the storage unit type check, the check is executed automatically via the definition of the bulk storage area.
5. Check for palletization data for LE qnty & controll qnty in MMR wm views
Rgds
Ram

Similar Messages

Put Away Strategy

Hi,
Here is my scenario:
I am using put away strategy to propose destination details. While proposing bins I need to check if there is a material already available in that bin and a Condition (date placed +1 day) otherwise another bin need to be proposed.
Could you please suggest me a user exit/badi available for this scenario? If so could you please also provide additional details how to implement?
BR/Sanjeeva

Hi,
Youhave use the enhancement MWMTO003 for this.
There are 4 exits available : EXIT_SAPLL03A_001 to EXIT_SAPLL03A_004
hope this helps
regards

Chainging Warehouse Put Away Strategy

Hi all,
Our business is considering a change in putaway strategy because we feel our current set up doesnt suit the needs of 1 or more plants.
Whilst we have identified the more suitable setting (A change from 'P' to 'I'), can anyone advise if this can be done within an opertaional warehouse whithout any major issues? Additionally, can setting 'I' accomodate different batches? (i.e. add stock to an existing bin ONLY if the batch number is the same)
(I appreciate everyone may have SAP setup slightly differently, but generally speaking is this possible)
Currently SAP allocates a new location each time a part is goods recipted without considering any empty capacity within an existing bin. This is resulting in man locations per part and increased picking times. In addition, we currently manually consolidate these bins when the staff have time, and this potentially results in human error if people miscount/mistype when moving the stock.
Thanks,
Stephen

Hi Jürgen,
We have a warehouse which operates with with standard rows of bins which are handled manually. The bins contain small/medium sized items which for the most part are not life-limited. In addition, they will all typically have the same batch with only the small exception - and for these exceptions we're happy to have SAP allocate to a new location to keep the batches separate. We do have pallet racking, but this is only for one row - 95% of the warehouse utilizes manual bins.
We define capacity using the appropriate fields in the Material Master where we stipulate the bin type and max qty per bin type (Warehouse Management 2).
Our Head Office warehouse uses automated picking machines and all products are handled in pallets - I believe this is why our additional UK plant has been automatically allocated the same P strategy - however, we have different requirements, and it would seem that ' I ' would suit us better. Our requirements are only simple and straight forward.
Thanks,
Stephen

Why 'Allow Negative Stock' doesnt go with put away strategy L

Just a quick question
Why Putaway Strategy L doesnt go with 'Allow Negative Stock'

Hi,
If you enter the putaway strategy L- system will finds the next empty bin where there is no quantiy or no quant.
If you assign "allow negative stock indicator", if stock is not there (ex for goods issue / delivery) system will generate a negative stock with a negative quant.
But while placing the new stock system will them neglect the bins with negative quantity (considering as quants), it will place it in the next empty bin.
It contradicts the logicof negative stock check, so standard will not allow negative stock indicator for putway strategy L.
thanks,
JK

Material Placememt - Put away strategy

Hi ,
We have a requirement like
Suppose we have bins like A , B , C , D , E etc with capacity of 100 boxes.All are empty initially.
Now at the time of first placement (say 60 boxes) we want system to select and place material BIN A.We want system to select the same bin till it gets filled completely (i.e 100 Boxes).Thereafter subsequent placement (say of 40 Boxes) are placed into next Bin i.e B.
Now when we picked some boxes (say 80 Boxes) from BIN A.
And make another placement (say of 10 Boxes) then system should continue to place material in STORAGE BIN B ( not in Bin A), as we want placement should continue to be in SINGLE BIN till the time it gets fully filled and then should select the next Bin.
How can we do this.
regards
Shrey

Hi ,
I believe NEXT EMPTY BIN will not work for me .With said satretegy at the time of every placement system will look for the next empty bin.
While I want system to cont place material in same bin till the time it gets fully occupied even if the previous bin is empty now.
I simple words, I want system to fill 1 bin at a time time and once it is fully filled only then system should search for next bin
Any idea
regards
Shrey

Pallet Wise Put Away

Hi Experts,
I am new to warehouse management, I have a scenario. Suppose we receipt material code xxx Qty 3300 Nos. One Pallet Qty 500 Nos. We can place one pallat in one bin only. Now we have to place this material in 7 pallets, 500 nos = 1 pallet in 6 bins and rest 300 nos in 7th bin.
Please help me how to configure in system / spro.
Thanks and Regards
Ishu

Hi
In the WM2 view in the material master in the palletization data you need to say that 500 of yopur base unit of measure i.e. EA = your Storage unit type
Example
500 EA S1
When you do a GR the syatem will calculate that 3300 = 5 X 600 and 1 X 300
Depending on yor put away strategy the system will then put away the pallets in to individual bins
I hope that this helps
Frenchy

User Exit for Put Away for multiple storage type

Hi All ,
we are using the exit EXIT_SAPML03T_002 for doing some capacity calculation and bin selection while doing a put away process in Ware house .
now i want to have two different type of storage types
say
A and B ,
if their are no empty bins in storage type A , then as per storage section search strategy the material should go in B storage type.
Both the storage type has next empty bin search strategy with user exit activated.
The difference between the two storage type is their individual capacity which is maintained in a custom table .
I am facing the problem that the exit is getting triggered only once .
ie. it will check for storage type A if the criteria is not met at a later stage while bin allocation , the system is not triggering the exit for B storage type .
do i need to do all validation and possibilities of not getting placed in storage type A in the exit . or does this exit will trigger for each storage type as per strategy if for any reason the stock is not placed in the previous storage type ?

Hi Experts
Thanks for the response,
As i tested for the 561 movement (initial upload) we need to do the put away manually.
So the system will not suggest Full qty to move to one Bulk and partial to different.
But for normal Goods receipt process the goods will be automatically placed to different storage type
based on the search strategy and in the Bulk structure we need to unchek the partial pallet allowed.
If anybody has difference pls revert
Regards
Depin

REG:PUT AWAY SRTATEGY

Hi Gurus,
I am new to these put away strategies,well i have a scenario were I need to add the stock in addition to existing stock first
if there is no bin with same stock it should go to next storage type,but it is not working.Can some one help me out with this.
Thanks,
Raju

Hi Raju,
I think you are using Strategy I: Addition to Existing Stock.
When addition to existing stock has been defined as a putaway strategy for a storage type, the system places goods in storage bins that already contain the same material. With this strategy, the system searches for a storage bin in which the material is already being stored. If the system cannot find a storage bin with the same material or the capacity of the storage bin will not allow additional quants to be stored, the system switches to the "next empty bin" strategy, that is, it searches for the next available empty storage bin. It is not working because it is finding an empty bin and does not going to next storage type.
I belive you should activate a user exit to solve the problem.
Regards.
Patricio.

Automatically split quantities on a put away.

The scenario is as follows:
We have two locations for a product '123'. One is a pick location which will hold up to 150 units of item '123' and the other is a bulk storage location.
When a put away task is created we want it to automatically show a quantity up to 150 to be put in the pick location and the balance of the delivery to be assigned to the bulk storage location.
Is this possible without manually going into the confirmation of the put away task and selecting the split quantities and then manually selecting the second location?

Hi Sanjeev,
as far as I see, the invocation service really does not start up automatically.
However, the following code should autostart all services marked requiring autostart according to the documentation of the DefaultCacheServer.start() method, which by the way also implies that this is the expected behaviour (that autostart services are not started by reading the cache configuration, but only the start method, which is by the way called by the DefaultCacheServer application, so you need not worry about that in case of the standalone cache server JVMs).
CacheFactory.ensureCluster();
DefaultCacheServer.start();Depending on what kind of container you deploy to, a single place is probably available for starting up the cluster.
E.g. in Weblogic:
- you can use an application server startup class if you have Coherence deployed to the server classpath.
- if you have Coherence deployed as part of your application, then you can just use an application startup class (deprecated) or application lifecycle listener (recommended). In this case you need to have such a class (application lifecycle listener or application shutdown class) anyway, to properly shut down Coherence, otherwise you will get strange NoClassDefFoundError-s upon redeploying the application.
Best regards,
Robert

SMQ2 Error: Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely) in ECC

Hi All,
I am processing an Outbound Scenario..everything is fine until SMQ2 shows an error in ECC system. SMQ2 shows me the following error:
Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)
Message no. VL609
My outbound delivery which was distributed to EWM system has overall picking status as blank (Not relevant for picking).
Our system is recently upgraded to EhP6, since then we are seeing this issue. Interestingly VL01NO (Delivery without reference to Order) works properly.
Other ECC-EWM integration settings are fine. Delivery Type and Item Category also look good.
I could not be able to find any OSS Note relevant to this situation.
Could you anyone help me.
Thanks
Mahesh.

Further what I see in this Outbound Scenario in EWM is when I am creating Outbound Delivery meant for EWM system with ref. to Sales Order, "Picking" tab shows EWM WHN but also shows Overall WM status as "Transfer Order Required" which is not correct.
If I remove Storage Location and re-enter then Over all WM status and Over all Picking status fields come as blank. But after all EWM processing, SMQ2 queue (FM: BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CONFIRM_DEC) fails with error
Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)
Message no. VL609.
Any thoughts?
Thanks
Mahesh

Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)

Hello SDNers,
I have a Batch program that is calling VL02n for Delievry Picking ,Pcking & PGI....
This batch program runs in Background
For Some Delivery it is giving this Error Message "Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)"
...But When i run the same program in foreground delivery got Processed Well.
CAN U PLS HELP ME
>Why this Happening
>In what scenarion we genearally get this message(we dnt have TO Confirm Step in our Process)
>even i Analyze the Program of VL02n ...This message is not there
From Where this message is comming
Thx in advance
PLS RPLY ASAP

After reading again through your messages, I understand that you are doing both PICK and PGI in single update BDC call to VL02N.
This is NOT correct way to do this, as this does not ensure that PICK values are committed first and then only PGI is attempted. We did face similar problems and have solved it by separating PICK and PGI in to two calls separated by COMMIT WORK AND WAIT.
I would suggest you to split your BDC into two calls. One which does only PICK and save and then followed by COMMIT WORK AND WAIT and then followed by another which does PGI and save. This should avoid the problem altogether.
Why it is not happening in foreground mode is it does not happen so quickly as in background. Even a split second can make a difference, that is why I would want you to split up both PICK and PGI update in two separate CALL TRANSACTION VL02N
I am not sure if it would help to know where the "Delivery has not yet been put away / picked (completely)" message is raised, as it is raised withing SAPs PGI routines, and it is mandatory that ONLY picked values are used for PGI.
I can only say that the message is given under id VL and no 609, it should be embedded somewhere in the PGI call, why don't you try to PGI without picking and put a watchpoint SY-MSGNO = 609

Backup Device not being "put away" properly.

I use a WD 1TB hard drive for my time machine backups. It's designed to sleep with and wake up with my mac. Now, whenever, I close the lid of my mac without ejecting the time machine drive, I always get an error message that "Data in the disk might be corrupted as the disk was not put away properly". What should I do to ensure that this message does not appear?
In Windows, I used to disable "Write Behind Cache" for that disk. Is there something like that here? I'm new to mac. Please help.

I would suggest you unmount the disk (drag it to the trash - no it won't be deleted!) before closing the lid.

I've had my iMac put away for about a year, now I can not remember the admin password upon startup. And I don't have the installation cd's (of course)! Is there any way to re-boot, re-do, get into my Mac to change it. I don't remember it even w/ the hint

I've had my iMac put away for about a year, now I can not remember the admin password upon startup. And I don't have the installation cd's (of course)! Is there any way to re-boot, re-do, get into my Mac to change it. I don't remember it even w/ the hint

Call Apple with the Serial and they will send you the ones that came with the Mac. Or search the Net.

Trigger on RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS while Receipt Updation in Put Away Report

Hi,
I am working on PUT Away Label Report :
The process is follows:
When receipt is saved , a trigger will fire on RCV_SHIPMENT_HEADERS and in trigger a package will be called which in turn will submit the report for the receipt that is newly created.
The problem here is trigger is working fine when new receipt is created,But when receipt is updated using ADD to receipt option or In case of Internal sales order.The trigger is not firing as trigger is fired for every new insertion.
I am not able to find any column to know that receipt is updated and to track the quantity that is receipted recently . Since RCV_SHIPMENT_LINES table will have the track of the Total receipted quantity till date.
I am attaching the script of Trigger i am using for insertion.Please suggest me how to approach in this scenario.
Trigger that is used for new receipt insertion:
AFTER INSERT
ON rcv_shipment_headers
FOR EACH ROW
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
l_request_id1 NUMBER;
BEGIN
BEGIN
If :NEW.RECEIPT_NUM IS NOT NULL
Then
l_request_id1 :=
fnd_request.submit_request ('XXINV',
'MTUPUTAWAY',
NULL,
:NEW.RECEIPT_NUM,
:new.SHIP_TO_ORG_ID
commit;
End If;
END;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS
THEN
NULL;
END;
Thanks in advance,
Best Regards,
Mahesh

you should post this question in the ebusiness-forum..

Difference between open storage & Bulk storage PUTAWAY STRATEGY

Dear all,
What is main difference between open storage & Bulk storage PUTAWAY STRATEGY ?
Thanks & Regards,
Olet Malla

Hi,
Open storage is a type of warehouse organization in which you define a single storage bin for a storage section. Normally if it a large area with one (or more) storage sections.
Materials that occur in large quantities and generally take up a lot of space in storage are often stored in bulk storage. Mainly it is used for Reduced need for physical storage bins, Fast access to the trading units, Clear structuring of the warehouse (into blocks and rows)
This putaway strategy searches for storage bins in bulk storage.
Thank you

Bulk put away strategy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for