Bundle the uplink ports on FI ?

Hi,
Can i "bundle" two uplink ports into an Etherchannel and then statically pin the server ports to the "bundle" (portchannel) and not the individual links ?
regards,
Geert

Geert,
Yes, you absolutely can uplink the FI with a port-channel to VSS or vPC.
See this for a visual of this design:
http://www.internetworkexpert.org/2009/07/05/cisco-ucs-vmware-vswitch-design-cisco-10ge-virtual-adapter/
I think Mike Frase was referring to how the IOM (I/O Module) inside the blade enclosure uplinks to the FI -- and he is correct that port channel is not currently an option for those links.
Cheers,
Brad
p.s. Please rate if helpful

Similar Messages

  • Best QOS Practice for a congested Uplink Port?

    I have an MPLS uplink port to a carrier that carries both voice and data.
    For example, Customer 3750 Switch 100MB Uplink--->100MB Uplink Carrier Router---Carrier Router 6MB MLPP Voice/Data MPLS Uplink with QOS configured for Voice subnet on carrier side too.
    The port occasionally suffers from overutilizition and spikes to the full 6MB
    I have a centralized CUCM that has phones that occasionally reset due to TCP 2000 timeouts (usually during the period of high utilization)
    So that I can avoid most phone resets during high utilization I have prioritized all voice traffic (signalling and RTP streams) to EF
    My question: What is best practice configuration for a congested uplink port? I'm going to assume the answer is it depends (the all great technical answer )
    Here are my thoughts on how to configure the 3750 uplink port so far:
    apply mls qos trust dscp
    apply priority-queue out
    (Here's where I'm looking for help)
    apply some sort of policing or bandwidth statement on the interface to protect the voice traffic: What are the recommendations and what would those configurations look like?
    I would apply these these configurations to the uplink ports at the edge site as well as the central site.
    Any thoughts as to the best way to accomplish this?

    Disclaimer
    The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    You want to prioritize VoIP traffic at congestion points, which for you, looks to be whenever your LAN bandwidth hits your 6 Mbps WAN.
    If the carrier takes your 100 Mbps, and doesn't just generally police all traffic to 6 Mbps, but instead has different priority queues for the 6 Mbps, all you should need to do, is insure you traffic is correctly processed by your WAN vendor.  This, though, might require marking your traffic for the WAN provider.
    If you carrier first polices all your traffic at 6 Mbps (many do), then you need to shape the traffic (with you own prioritization) before the provider "sees" it.  If you need to "shape" on the 3750, there's a command to limit a port's bandwidth utilization, as a percentage.  However it's not exact, so you may need to "shape" slower than 6 Mbps to insure 6 Mbps won't be exceeded.  (BTW, for 6 Mbps, if you need to do QoS, you would be better off with an ISR.)
    You also mention 6 MLPPP, but it's unlclear what your device is for that.
    How to configure 3750 QoS is involved.  Basically when you enable QoS, each port has four dedicated egress queues.  By default, different traffic markings go into one of the four queues, each queue has same share of the bandwidth, and almost same share of the buffers.  The PQ command you noted, enables the first queue to always transmit its packets first.  Normally, you'll want to do that for VoIP bearer packets, which you've (insured are) directed to that queue.  You also want to insure that VoIP signally packets are not likley to be dropped and, more or less, are forwarded quickly.
    Cisco has multiple papers on QoS configurations, including papers for 3750s, so instead of my trying to present that, the above is intended as an overview.  Feel free to post additional questions, the more specific, the more likely you'll get an answer.

  • 6500 with 2 SUP's/do the GIG ports on the backup SUP work, when in backup?

    Hey I'm bout to install a 6500 series with 2 SUP engines, one for primary and one for backup in the same chassis.
    My question is: Do the fiber/GIG ports on the backup SUP engine work, when it is in backup mode, or ONLY when the SUP engine is in primary mode???
    thanks,
    cisco80211
    Chris Serafin
    IT Security / Cisco VoIP Engineer
    [email protected]

    Hi Chris,
    The gig ports on the standby supervisor are absolutely functional, and the converse is true in the event of a switchover.
    Documented here:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps700/products_installation_guide_chapter09186a0080123ecd.html
    "The uplink ports are fully functional on the redundant supervisor engine in standby mode"
    HTH,
    Bobby
    *Please rate helpful posts.

  • NCS wired MAC trace incorrectly puts MAC at uplink ports

    Greetings,
    I generally love the Cisco Prime NCS functionality which allows one to quickly trace a MAC address to a switch and port.  However, I'm having trouble with some MACs appearing at the uplink port of a closet switch rather than it's real access port on a different.  While it is true that this PC's MAC is in the CAM for that closet uplink port, it's there with hundreds of others.  It is also in the CAM for the port it is actually connected to, and in that case it's the ONLY MAC for that port, as expected.   Both switches are functioning within NCS, and in fact if I drill down into the switch it is connected to, the client detail shows this MAC connected to the proper port.  It's just the search trace that "incorrectly" shows it out at some uplink.   In fact, it moves around to different closet uplinks (per the MAC search history results).  It doesn't only happen with this MAC, either.   I kind of sold the customer on this functionality and it's a little embarrassing.
    1. Has anyone seen it and knows of a way to get it to show correctly and/or prevent this problem?
    2. What criteria does NCS use to determine where to place the item when the MAC appears in multiple places?  I would think it would at least pick a port that does not have other MAC addresses on it first, under the assumption that ports with multiple MACs are uplinks (I realize that there are cases where it COULD be on a multiple MAC port, such as an uplink to an unmonitored switch...not the case here).   I can tell you that in the cases I've noticed, the uplinks are not 802.1q, just access ports.
    Thanks!
    Gary

    Had the same issue here.  Here is the best solution I have found so far:
    Hotspot + Pepwave Max On-The-Go (w/ Load Balancing) + Airport Extreme
    I have a VZW MiFi, but I believe this set-up will work with other hotspot devices.  I actually have 2 MiFi Hotspots with a monthly allowance of 20G each.  They are plugged directly into the Pepwave router (aka, tethered).  (Note:  you have to have the right cable to do this.  The one that came with my Hotspot was only for charging.)  If, for some reason, you cannot tether with your Hotspot device, you want a router that offers WiFi as WAN.  The Pepwave will do this.  The Pepwave is connected to my Airport Extreme via ethernet cable.  I have the WiFi on the MiFis and the Pepwave turned off.  So the only visible network is my Airport Extreme.  The Pepwave is essentially just functioning as a modem.
    I used to have a Cradlepoint, but I did not find it very user friendly--too complex for home use.  The Pepwave Max OTG is awesome.  I got the one with Load Balancing so it allows you to connect up to 4 cellular devices.  If you only need the one Hotspot, you can just get the cheaper Pepwave Max OTG.  The Pepwave allows me to run off one of the MiFis until I hit my 20G/month allowance, then it automatically switches to the other one.  That way I never max-out on my monthly data allowance.  Additionally, it gives you a real-time, hourly, daily and monthly running tally on data usage.
    The guys at the 3Gstore are excellent and can help you figure out the best solution for your situation.

  • Catalyst 2960 uplink ports

    Hi,
    is there any difference between uplink ports (using 1Gbps SFP) and any another 10/100/1000 port on Catalyst 2960X ?  What I mean is: if uplink port has a 1Gbps SFP and considering that standard port are 10/100/1000, is there a reason, for example related to Catalyst internal hardware and bus architecture, that should make me connect a server to the uplink port instead to any another port ?
    Thank you a lot,
    enrico.

    Although you can purchase Copper SFP's, people generally use the SFP ports on a switch to connect fibre cables to which means they they get the full 12/24/48 ports for their hosts.
    Using one or more of the standard ports for uplinks means there are less for hosts but if you have spare and don't want the cost of running fibre and purchasing additional SFP's then use the normal ports.

  • 2960 dual purpose uplink ports

    Hello folks, I just need to confirm the uplink ports for the 2960.
    The Data sheet shows.....
    WS-C2960-24TC-L
    • 24 Ethernet 10/100 ports and 2 dual-purpose uplinks (each dual-purpose uplink port has one 10/100/1000 Ethernet port and 1 SFP-based Gigabit Ethernet port, 1 port active)
    • 1 RU fixed-configuration
    • LAN Base Image installed
    Does this mean that I can only have 1 active uplink port (interface) at a time?
    Or
    Does it mean that I can use either Copper or Fiber at a time?
    Thanks in advance I appreciate your help.
    Regards,
    JP

    Disclaimer
    The  Author of this posting offers the information contained within this  posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that  there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose.  Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not  be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this  posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
    Liability Disclaimer
    In  no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including,  without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out  of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author  has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
    Posting
    Or one port as copper and one port as SFP.
    Basically, the a copper and SFP port are paired, either of the pair can be used, but not both of the same pair at the same time.
    As you have two uplinks, you have two pairs.

  • Uplink port VLAN

    Hi there:
    I'm lost
    I know when you have for example two uplink ports that belong at the same vlan, and two or more vNICs asociated at this vlans, pinning happen dinamically
    I know how configure a VLAN and assign it to an vNIC
    But I can't found how to associate the uplink port to this VLAN in UCS manager
    Can anybody help me please
    Thank you in advance
    Al

    Al,
    In the end-host mode for the ethernet, once you define the vlan in the UCSM the vlan is automatically assgined / configured on all the uplink and the server ports.
    Here is a chapter from the config guide:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2.0/UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter15.html
    However starting with version 2.0 there is a feature under which you can control or confiure different vlans on different uplink ports. This feature is L2-disjoint feature and here is a URL to configure it:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/2.0/UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_2_0_chapter21.html
    Hope this helps!
    ./Abhinav

  • Uplink ports and actual switches sfp usages (please help~~)

    Dear all,
    I am reading around to see the differences between uplink ports and normal ethernet ports. It seems to be uplink port just reverse the rx,tx pins and remove the needs of using a crossover cable.
    I have done a simple representation of using the below (normal ethernet ports)
    PC
    SWITCH
    ROUTER 
    RX
    straight
    TX
    straight
    RX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    straight
    RX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    straight
    TX
    I assumed that the SWITCH ethernet port pins are naturally arranged as opposite from the PC so that a straight cable can be used and the same applies to a router port.
    Q1) Hence from PC to Router ethernet port, I will need a cross cable, am I right ?
    ============================================================
    Then I chance upon this website http://duxcw.com/faq/network/uplink.htm which states "A PC can be connected to an uplink port with a crossover cable"
    As per my assumption above, a router has normal ethernet ports and uplink ports (for connecting to the wan/modem), since the normal ethernet ports of a router are in the order of (RX,RX,TX,TX) as shown above, I assumed the uplink port is (TX,TX,RX,RX).
    PC
    ROUTER normal ethernet port
    PC
    ROUTER uplink port
    RX
    cross
    RX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    RX
    cross
    RX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    cross
    TX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    TX
    cross
    TX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    Q2) So how can the PC connect to the Router's Uplink port using a crossover cable ? Shouldn't it be using straight cable instead if it is trying to connect to a router's uplink port ?
    ============================================================
    Q3) Where connecting switches (switch 1 to swtich2) using uplink port, can I say that a straight cable will be connected to switch 1 uplink port on 1 end, and a normal ethernet port in switch 2 on another end ?
    SWITCH#1 ethernet port
    SWITCH#1 Uplink port
    SWITCH#2 ethernet port
    TX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    RX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    RX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    ============================================================
    Q4) What is the purpose of an SFP port in a switch ? is it use as an uplink port ? Where does it actually uplink/connect to ?
    Q5) If i connect a switch Uplink port to another switch Uplink port, does it means that I have to use a crossover cable ? does SFP fiber come with "crossover" type too ?
    ============================================================
    Q6) If an uplink port in a switch is use to connect to a router (can we?), do i need to use a crossover cable then ? since a normal switch ethernet port will use a straight cable to connect to a router port ? as shown below
    SWITCH
    ROUTER 
    SWITCH UPLINK
    ROUTER 
    TX
    straight
    RX
    RX
    cross
    RX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    RX
    cross
    RX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    cross
    TX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    cross
    TX
    ============================================================
    Q7) Last but not least, if a design connect two switches using SFP uplink ports on both side, what would be the main purpose ? to increase the amount of ports ?  Why not stack them then ?
    Sorry for the lengthy post, will really appreciate if some gurus can shed some light on the above.
    Thanks a million.
    Regards,
    Noob

    An uplink port doesn't necessarily run at wire speed but it is more likely to.
    But this doesn't mean you don't get oversubscription from the switch to other switches.
    It's quite a big subject to cover but i'll try and keep it brief.
    Internally within a switch there is a crossbar switch fabric which I think we covered before. Think of it of as pathways between ports. On any switch there are a number of ports that are capable of certain speeds.
    Put simply if you take the number of ports on the switch and multiply that by the fastest speed the ports can operate at, if that number is greater than the switch fabric then the switch is said to be oversubscribed.
    It doesn't mean in practice it will be oversubscribed but the potential is there.
    What can happen though with oversubscribed switches is that the uplinks ports are guaranteed not to be oversubscribed ie. they do not need to contend with the other ports on the switch. It's complicated but it is to do with the connectors per port group etc. to the switch fabric.
    But even though the uplinks ports can run at wire speed so they are not oversubscribed, if they are uplinks to other switches there may very well be more traffic combined from the other ports on the switch to that uplink port so you still get an oversubscription ratio.
    But what would make it a whole lot worse was if your uplink port was oversubscribed within the switch as well.
    So there is oversubscription within the switch and this is where we talk about ports running at wire speed or not and then there is oversubscription between different layers of the network eg. access to distribution for example.
    Jon

  • Uplink ports and actual sfp port in switches ( please help )

    Dear all,
    I am reading around to see the differences between uplink ports and normal ethernet ports. It seems to be uplink port just reverse the rx,tx pins and remove the needs of using a crossover cable.
    I have done a simple representation of using the below (normal ethernet ports)
    PC
    SWITCH
    ROUTER 
    RX
    straight
    TX
    straight
    RX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    straight
    RX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    straight
    TX
    I assumed that the SWITCH ethernet port pins are naturally arranged as opposite from the PC so that a straight cable can be used and the same applies to a router port.
    Q1) Hence from PC to Router ethernet port, I will need a cross cable, am I right ?
    ============================================================
    Then I chance upon this website http://duxcw.com/faq/network/uplink.htm which states "A PC can be connected to an uplink port with a crossover cable"
    As per my assumption above, a router has normal ethernet ports and uplink ports (for connecting to the wan/modem), since the normal ethernet ports of a router are in the order of (RX,RX,TX,TX) as shown above, I assumed the uplink port is (TX,TX,RX,RX).
    PC
    ROUTER normal ethernet port
    PC
    ROUTER uplink port
    RX
    cross
    RX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    RX
    cross
    RX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    cross
    TX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    TX
    cross
    TX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    Q2) So how can the PC connect to the Router's Uplink port using a crossover cable ? Shouldn't it be using straight cable instead if it is trying to connect to a router's uplink port ?
    ============================================================
    Q3) Where connecting switches (switch 1 to swtich2) using uplink port, can I say that a straight cable will be connected to switch 1 uplink port on 1 end, and a normal ethernet port in switch 2 on another end ?
    SWITCH#1 ethernet port
    SWITCH#1 Uplink port
    SWITCH#2 ethernet port
    TX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    RX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    RX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    ============================================================
    Q4) What is the purpose of an SFP port in a switch ? is it use as an uplink port ? Where does it actually uplink/connect to ?
    Q5) If i connect a switch Uplink port to another switch Uplink port, does it means that I have to use a crossover cable ? does SFP fiber come with "crossover" type too ?
    ============================================================
    Q6) If an uplink port in a switch is use to connect to a router (can we?), do i need to use a crossover cable then ? since a normal switch ethernet port will use a straight cable to connect to a router port ? as shown below
    SWITCH
    ROUTER 
    SWITCH UPLINK
    ROUTER 
    TX
    straight
    RX
    RX
    cross
    RX
    TX
    straight
    RX
    RX
    cross
    RX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    cross
    TX
    RX
    straight
    TX
    TX
    cross
    TX
    ============================================================
    Q7) Last but not least, if a design connect two switches using SFP uplink ports on both side, what would be the main purpose ? to increase the amount of ports ?  Why not stack them then ?
    Sorry for the lengthy post, will really appreciate if some gurus can shed some light on the above.
    Thanks a million.
    Regards,
    Noob

    Hi Noob,
    On some kit like netgear hubs etc, you may find a little button or
    slider switch which may be labelled MDI or MDI(X) this allows a
    straight cable to be used between 2 Hubs or switches (Both DCEs).
    Some Cisco switches/routers will allow you to do the same but in software
    interface fastethernet 1/0/1
    mdix auto
    ====================================
    DTE devices like say your laptop PC NIC card has an MDI (Medium Dependant Interface).
    Physically this wires out as ( For 10/100M):-
    RJ45 PIN
    1  -- TRANSMIT +ve
    2  -- TRANSMIT -ve
    3  -- RECEIVE +ve
    6  -- RECEIVE -ve
    DCE devices like hubs & swiches have MDI-X (Medium Dependant Interface - Crossedover).
    Physically this wires out as ( For 10/100M):-
    RJ45 PIN
    1  -- RECEIVE +ve
    2  -- RECEIVE -ve
    3  -- TRANSMIT +ve
    6  -- TRANSMIT -ve
    So lets connect the device together with a STRAIGHT cable ( Function DTE to DCE)
    PC/NIC = DTE = MDI                                SWITCH = DCE = MDI(X)
    RJ45 PIN                                           RJ45 PIN
    1  -- TRANSMIT +ve -------------------------------- 1  -- RECEIVE +ve
    2  -- TRANSMIT -ve -------------------------------- 2  -- RECEIVE -ve
    3  -- RECEIVE +ve --------------------------------- 3  -- TRANSMIT +ve
    6  -- RECEIVE -ve --------------------------------- 6  -- TRANSMIT -ve
    So we transmit from the DTE and receive on the DCE and vice versa (BINGO).
    Remember Routers are regarded as DTEs
    =================================
    So lets connect 2 switches  together with a CROSSOVER cable ( Function DCE to DCE)
    UPLINK to UPLINK
    SWITCH = DCE = MDI(X)                           SWITCH = DCE = MDI(X)
    RJ45 PIN                                           RJ45 PIN
    1  -- RECEIVE +ve -------------------------------- 3  -- TRANSMIT +ve
    2  -- RECEIVE -ve --------------------------------- 6  -- TRANSMIT -ve
    3  -- TRANSMIT +ve ------------------------------ 1  -- RECEIVE +ve
    6  -- TRANSMIT -ve ------------------------------- 2  -- RECEIVE -ve
    So we transmit from the DCE and receive on the DCE and vice versa (BINGO).
    Regards
    Alex

  • Stop ethernet uplink port will cause appliance port down

    Dear All,
    I would like to make sure what kind of network traffic will communicate internal in FI.
    I disabled the uplink port, and found appliance port was also down.
    Does appliance port need to route to uplink port and then back to UCS server ?
    Thank you for clarification.
    Best Regards,
    Dennis Dai

    Expected behavior.  By default, if there are no uplinks online & fwd, then all southbound links (server links and appliance ports) will also go down.
    See Abi's explanation here for details how to modify this behavior.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2187144?tstart=0
    In short you have to change the Network Control policy of the Appliance port from the Equipment Tab.
    Regards,
    Robert

  • FI's uplink ports Error Disabled on ENM loop

    Hi,
    I have two UCS6120XP FIs connected to a Cat2948G-GE-TX switch via port 1/3 on each FI. One port on the Cat2948G-GE-TX acts as the uplink port and is connected to the LAN. All ports of the Cat2948G-GE-TX are in VLAN 1 to allow all connected devices to reach the Gateway via the LAN uplink port.
    Now after a while both ports 1/3 on the FIs get error disabled on ENM loop.
    'show cdp neighbor' on the Cat2k shows FIs hanging off of 2/45 & 2/46. The management ports of both FIs are connected to ports 2/1 and 2/2 of the
    Cat2948G-GE-TX as well, as are some other devices.
    I'd like to keep both FI uplink ports enabled for failover scenarios - how can I achieve that w/o the ports getting error-disabled?
    Thanks,
    Matthias

    Hi,
    The reload was to test the loss of a FI prior to going into the production environment. A disassociate/reassociate of a SP made no difference.
    I plan to upgrade to V2.2(1D) and re-test again tomorrow.

  • Why the Fibre uplink ports are down state even after giving no shutdown command at the interface

    Hi
    My Predecessors brought 2 CISCO 3750 switches and implemented LACP on these core switches. Due to looping in the network the Fibre uplink ports GigabitEthernet1/1/3 and GigabitEthernet2/1/3 are down (I think these uplink ports are mirrored in the LACP concept)
    Please see below from the configuration.
    I logged into the core switch and went to this particular interface GigabitEthernet1/1/3 and I gave the following command and still the port is in the down state after I gave no shutdown command. Do I need to give the same no shutdown command at interface GigabitEthernet2/1/3 as well ?
    Switch-Core1(config) interface GigabitEthernet1/1/3
    Switch-Core1(config-if)#no shutdown
    Switch-Core1(config-if)#
    Please see below  After no shutdown command given still these 2 Gigabit fibre uplink ports are down.
    GigabitEthernet1/0/20  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet1/0/21  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet1/0/22  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet1/0/23  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet1/0/24  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet1/1/1   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet1/1/2   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet1/1/3   unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet1/1/4   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    Te1/1/1                unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    Te1/1/2                unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/1   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/2   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/3   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/4   unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/5   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/6   unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/7   unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/8   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/9   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/10  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/11  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/12  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/13  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/14  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/15  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/16  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/17  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/18  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/19  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/20  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/21  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/22  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/0/23  unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/0/24  unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/1/1   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/1/2   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    GigabitEthernet2/1/3   unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    GigabitEthernet2/1/4   unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
    Te2/1/1                unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    Te2/1/2                unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    Port-channel1          unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    Port-channel2          unassigned      YES unset  down                  down
    Please  let me know if I am doing something wrong .Please post me some tutorial to sort this.

    It is possible you are overloading that little 4215. If that is the case you should also be seeing "missed packet percentage" messages in your events.
    How much traffic is your 4215 getting? Those sensors will start to drop packets for inspection at about 30 Mb/s.
    - Bob

  • WRT54G v5 Uplink Port Not Designated

    Running out of ethernet ports, wanting to add a Fast Switch (SMCGS5), the back panel of this router doesn't designate which port is an uplink port, likewise the switch. Unless I went blind, my User Guide and the User Guide online for this model, has no mention of any uplink port designation, other than the 3rd paragraph of the online Product Description, for this model.
    I'm currently using one laptop, two PC's, and one NAS, and want to add one more wired PC. I'm noticing intermittent stalling or freezing after I installed the switch into Port 1. So I switched over to running to the switch from Port 4, noticed no difference in wired performance. Shutdown everything to be used on the network, including doing a reset all, no change in wired performance when the switch is used, otherwise, works fine with existing router/switch ports. 
    Took switch to friends house to install in their network. They have no problems with this switch.
    Would anyone be able to help me identify if the WRT54G v5 Router even has a uplink port? Or are "all" the ports, uplink ports? I've read the pre-posting information and have searched for similar question(s).
    Message Edited by EdGordonJr on 12-28-2008 08:59 AM

    You can still keep your linksys router...I would recommend you to upgrade the firmware on the router , then reset and re-configure it...
    Download the firmware from here ,
    Follow these steps to upgrade the firmware on the device: -
    Open an Internet Explorer browser page.In the address bar type - 192.168.1.1
    Leave username blank & in password use admin in lower case...
    Click on the 'Administration' tab- Then click on the 'Firmware Upgrade' sub tab- Here click on 'Browse' and browse the .bin firmware file and click on "Upgrade"...
    Wait for few seconds until it shows that "Upgrade is successful"  After the firmware upgrade, click on "Reboot" and you will be returned back to the same page OR it will say "Page cannot be displayed".
    Press and hold the reset button for 30 seconds...
    Then, unplug the power cable while holding down the reset button for another 30 Seconds...
    Plug the power cable back in, and keep holding down the reset button for another 30 Seconds...
    Release the reset button...Now re-configure your router and connect it to your switch...I hope this works...

  • SR-IOV Uplink Port with NIC Teaming

    Hello,
    I'm trying to setup my uplink port profile and logical switch with NIC Teaming and SR-IOV support. In Hyper-V this was easy, just had to create the NIC Team (which I configured as Dynamic & LACP) then check the box on the virtual switch.
    I'm VMM it does not seem to like to enable NIC Teams with SR-IOV:
    Can anyone advise? I'm not using any virtual ports. I just want all my VMs to connect to the physical switch though the LACP NIC Team, something which I thought would be simple.
    I have a plan B - don't use Microsoft's NIC Teaming and instead use the Intel technology to present all the adapters as one to the host. I'd rather no do this.
    Thanks
    MrGoodBytes

    Hi Sir,
    "SR-IOV does have certain limitations. If you configure port access control lists (ACLs), extensions or policies in the virtual switch, SR-IOV is disabled because its traffic totally bypasses the switch.
    You can’t team two SR-IOV network cards in the host. You can, however, take two physical SR-IOV NICs in the host, create separate virtual switches and team two virtual network cards within a VM. "
    There is really a limitation when using NIC teaming :
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/dn235778.aspx
    Best Regards,
    Elton Ji 
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact [email protected] .

  • Bundling Cisco ISE ports

    Hello,
    Cisco ISE user guide suggests that all 4 ports can be assigned IP addresses and that's that. No suggestions such as if the all ports should be on different VLANs or if the ports can be bundled, hence saving IP address space. I have read the book by ISE expert Aaron Woland and no suggestions either.
    On a Standalone ISE, as soon as I configured Gi1 with a different IP subnet from Gi0, I lost GUI access. So my questions are as follows:
    1. Can all 4 ports be bundled
    2. If no bundling and all 4 ports are assigned IP addresses, can they be on different IP subnets, whether Standalone or Distributed personas. For example a PSN with 4 ports. Gi0 - 10.0.10.x, Gi1 - 172.16.5.x, Gi2 - 172.16.8.x, Gi - 10.2.5.x
    Thanks 

    The ISE log detailed steps are as follows:
    Steps
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11017  RADIUS created a new session
    Evaluating Service Selection Policy
    15048  Queried PIP
    15048  Queried PIP
    15004  Matched rule
    11507  Extracted EAP-Response/Identity
    12300  Prepared EAP-Request proposing PEAP with challenge
    12625  Valid EAP-Key-Name attribute received
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12501  Extracted EAP-Response/NAK requesting to use EAP-TLS instead
    12500  Prepared EAP-Request proposing EAP-TLS with challenge
    12625  Valid EAP-Key-Name attribute received
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12502  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response and accepting EAP-TLS as negotiated
    12800  Extracted first TLS record; TLS handshake started
    12805  Extracted TLS ClientHello message
    12806  Prepared TLS ServerHello message
    12807  Prepared TLS Certificate message
    12809  Prepared TLS CertificateRequest message
    12505  Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP-TLS challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12504  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response
    12505  Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP-TLS challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12504  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response
    12505  Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP-TLS challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    5411  No response received during 120 seconds on last EAP message sent to the client

Maybe you are looking for

  • IMovie 6 will not Share/Export

    I have successfully imported clips from my Sony HD camera. BUT iMovie 6 will NOT export nor share. Tried all possible options (even select clips only, reduced clip size down to 6 seconds). No luck. Any ideas what to do next? My computer is a new G5 P

  • How to change the template of a FSG report in General Ledger

    Hi all I have created a report in Financial Statement Statement Generator. I have created a new RTF template. Then created a new template in XML Publisher Administrator responsibility and uploaded the RTF template created previously. I am try to atta

  • How to get tamil font????

    i would like to read tamil ebook in my handheld but i found that my device is not supporting tamil fonts. I would like to know how to install fonts and where i can find them.

  • I18N, Sending from flex to Java server

    Hi I'm doing a flex application for client and Java for server side. i want to send the name of the user to the server. <Code> var loader:URLLoader = new URLLoader(); var vars:URLVariables = new URLVariables(); vars.name = name <-or-> vars.name = esc

  • Sld settings for idoc to idoc

    hi experts, for the idoc to idoc scenrio (not making use of BPM) I have 2 business systems in sld which will be referring to the two r/3 systems. suppose bus_system1 has logical system name as logsys1 for server1 suppose bus_system2 has logical syste