Burn full size Jpegs in 64 bit version?

The export prest "burn fullsize jpegs" apeears to missing in the 64 bit version but is present in the 32 bit version> Is this a limitation or an error?

The 64-Bit version is missing some needed libraries to burn to CD straight out of LR.
Save to the OS frist, and burn for the OS afterwards.
HTH
Franz

Similar Messages

Aperture won't export full-size jpegs

I'm trying to export full-size jpegs, but Aperture is sending out 24 KB images. I'm selecting the edited versions I want, then going File>Export>Version. I have the dialog set to JPEG - Original Size. Still, what comes out is a thumbnail.
Aperture 3.4.5
OSX 10.8.5
MacBook Pro
2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4 GB Memory

Check, if your export preset "JPEG - Original size" is still set correctly.
In the "Export" panel set the "Export Preset" pop-up to "Edit".
In the "Edit" panel make sure, that "Size to" is set to "Original Size", and the quality to a high value, at least 10.

Burn Full-sized JPEG's option missing in new installation

I have been using 2.5 on my old XP box and it has been fine. I have just built a new Windows 7 PC and installed LR2.5 64 bit and have noticed that on file > export with preset the option to Burn Full-sized JPEG's is missing! Not there at all. Any ideas?

Are the other two presets there? Perhaps deleting Prefs (assuming you brought it over from the old)- might do it.
How to locate Preferences files in LR

Exporting full size Jpegs from DNG converted files

Hi there
I imported some RAW files into Lightroom 4, which I then copied/converted to DNG, then edited them. I now want to export them as full size, high-quality jpegs but I only seem to be able to export them at a maximum of about 800kb, which is far lower than full-size. Is this to do with first the conversion to DNG from RAW on the import? Am I best copying them from raw and not converting them to DNG at all? Next question is, will I have to import the original RAWs again and re-edit them to be able to export as full-size high quality jpegs or is there some way to not have to do them again? Many thanks, Sophie

The curious thing is that when I try to export full size jpegs through the email function,
Do you mean exporting through the e-mail the EXACT SAME photos that you were discussing above?
Have you done any cropping of the photos? What is the size, in pixels, of one of these photos according to Lightroom? What is the size, in pixels, of the corresponding exported photo, according to your operating system?
Can you show us screen captures of the export dialog box?
At this time, I am not going to deal with the print at A4 size being pixelated, as printing introduces a lot of other places where something can go wrong. To see if the problem is in the export, I want to know if you look at the exported photo outside of Lightroom, does it appear pixelated or not?

Exporting smaller size JPEGs

In managing a library of thousands of scans of LP record covers I typically save one very large .psd file. I save a 2nd cropped reduced .jpg for use in FileMaker and iTunes and possible web use.
Now with Aperture I don't need to save an additional copy of the smaller file. But a resaved JPEG from GraphicConverter at 300x300 is approx. 45k. The same cropped version exported from Aperture is about 245k. I'm wondering if this is because GConverter allows me to save without a resource fork. Or is it all because of the quality of the preview chosen in Preferences?
Does exporting for email reduce a file size more than a version export?

The curious thing is that when I try to export full size jpegs through the email function,
Do you mean exporting through the e-mail the EXACT SAME photos that you were discussing above?
Have you done any cropping of the photos? What is the size, in pixels, of one of these photos according to Lightroom? What is the size, in pixels, of the corresponding exported photo, according to your operating system?
Can you show us screen captures of the export dialog box?
At this time, I am not going to deal with the print at A4 size being pixelated, as printing introduces a lot of other places where something can go wrong. To see if the problem is in the export, I want to know if you look at the exported photo outside of Lightroom, does it appear pixelated or not?

When I import files (copy from jpeg or copy as DNG from raw, where is the full size original stored?

I have the photos go here file, does LR5 put the untouched original there? Do I need my own file for originals and if so, how does LR5 know where to find the full size original? I have everything working but don't understand where my untouched originals go after import. Say I import off my card to My Pictures/Lightroom Catalog/ Photos go here ..... are my originals there? What if I erase my card now, do I only have partial size negatives basically? I don't understand why LR5 didnt put in an originals do here file that imports the full photo to a stock folder. I am so confused I am about ready to throw out LR5. I even bought your instructional DVD and it doesnt make where the original files location clear, it just repeats that LT5 does NOT import the original, just thumbnail and instructions, where is the program getting the photo when I double click to open it , or am I only seeing a lower resolution version of the photo and the full res is now gone because I formatted the card?

When you import photos, you can choose "Copy" or "Move" or "Copy as DNG", and then select a destination folder on your hard disk. This happens on the right hand side of the Import dialog box. So your original files go to this destination folder.
Alternatively, if your photos are already on your hard disk, you can import by choosing "Add" and the original photos remain in the existing location.
If you're not sure where the photos are, open Lightroom, go to the Library Module, and on the right hand side is the Metadata Panel. Set the dropdown to "Default", and it will show you where your photos are stored. Alternatively, you can right-click on any photo and select "Show In Finder"/"Show in Explorer" and Lightroom will take you to the exact folder where the photo is located.
So, bottom line, you are in total control of where the originals go, and if your forgot where you put them, or made a mistake, you can always find out where they are.
What if I erase my card now, do I only have partial size negatives basically?
If your import was successful, then the photos are now stored on your hard disk. So you have the full size original for Lightroom to work with.
it just repeats that LT5 does NOT import the original, just thumbnail and instructions
Lightroom does import the original, which means, in Lightroom jargon, that it records the location and metadata about the photo; in other words, Lightroom knows where the photo is, but Lightroom NEVER contains your photo, your photo is ALWAYS stored on the hard disk.
Because Lightroom now knows where your photo is located, it is important that you not manage your photos (move, edit, rename, delete) outside of Lightroom. Photo managements tasks now must be done in Lightroom. (There are advanced methods that let you manage your photos outside of Lightroom, but these would be NOT RECOMMENDED for beginners)

APERTURE users: how do we send full size images without compression? Mail compresses, Drop Box, all that have a tag "badges" next to JPEG under 'Info' in Aperture compress? What can I do, HELP Please.

In Aperture under INFO at bottom it says Badges; if it has an Icon in the block it compresses JPEG image down to KB? Using mail, using drop box with my Aperture and can't figure out how to get rid of 'Badges with the Icon in the box to be able to send full size. Also have been using: "onOne Software" an add on editing program thats awesome, works as a stand alone, Aperture, & Lightroom.
Bottom Line I can't send to lab my web page, or individule without it compressing. Even created a desk top folder droped & dragged in ZIP & still Compression?

See this link: Aperture 3 User Manual: Understanding Badge Overlays
The badges in the Info panel have nothing to do with compression. The tell you, if your image has keywords attached, if it is a raw or jpeg image, if has been externally edited, or if it is referenced.
When you send an jpeg using mail, you need to set the image size in Mail to "Acual Size", otherwise will Mail compress the image. For example:
If you have really large images, Mail may not be optimal, because the server of the recepient may refuse to accept large Mail attachments. In that case export the image from Aperture in the resolution you want with "File > Export" and compress it as a zip file. That will not reduce the quality.
Send the zipped file, if it is small enough, otherwise upload it to an ftp-server.
The receiver can uncompress it.
Regards
Léonie

In iPhoto most of my photos appear to have been replaced by much smaller versions. What has happened and how can I get the full size photos back?

In iPhoto most of my photos appear to have been replaced by much smaller versions. What has happened and how can I get the full size photos back?

That is either a bug in Firefox 5 or the script has a problem with Firefox 5.<br />
It works in all other Firefox versions like Firefox 3 and 4 and 6 (Aurora) and 7 (Nightly).

HT4407 It will not burn the 32-bit version of the software.

Mac Mini 2012. I've tried twice and it will not burn me the 32-bit version of the Bootcamp drivers for my Windows 7 32-bit install. Where can I get the blasted 32-bit drivers?

For what it's worth, I don't have OpenCL capability in 32 bit Photoshop either, and I have an ATI card.
Notably the 32 bit Adobe GPU sniffer application says nothing about OpenCL support. It may just be something they don't do (though I have never been able to get them to say so). It would make sense for them to concentrate on 64 bit mostly, since there's no Macintosh 32 bit version at all.
As far as I understand it, if you don't have OpenCL, Photoshop will attempt to implement GPU programming via OpenGL shader, so you may not be missing anything at all.
FYI, here are respective sniffer outputs:
C:\TEMP>cd "\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6"
C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6>sniffer_gpu
Device: 002CE8B4 has video RAM(MB): 0
Device: 002CE8B4 has video RAM(MB): 2048
Vendor string:    ATI Technologies Inc.
Renderer string: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Version string:   3.0.11979 Compatibility Profile Context
OpenGL version as determined by Extensionator...
OpenGL Version 3.0
Has NPOT support: TRUE
Has Framebuffer Object Extension support: TRUE
OpenGL ok
Return code: 1
C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6>cd "\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)"
C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Photoshop CS6 (64 Bit)>sniffer_gpu
Device: 00000000005FAD68 has video RAM(MB): 1434
Device: 00000000005FAD68 has video RAM(MB): 2048
Vendor string:    ATI Technologies Inc.
Renderer string: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
Version string:   3.0.11979 Compatibility Profile Context
OpenGL version as determined by Extensionator...
OpenGL Version 3.0
Has NPOT support: TRUE
Has Framebuffer Object Extension support: TRUE
OpenGL ok
OpenCL ok, version=1.2 AMD-APP (1084.2)
Return code: 3
-Noel

Upon opening a thumbnail to view full size image, it often spontaneously zooms to only display bottom left quarter of image.

When double-clicking on the thumbnail image of an iPhoto album, the full size image will often spontaneously zoom to only display the bottom left quarter of the entire photo when it displays in full size. I can easily work around this by clicking on the right arrow to go to the next full size image (which will display properly) and then click on the left arrow to go back to the initial affected image (which will also then display properly). It does not do this when full-sizing all images from their thumbnails - probably less than 10% of the time; but still often enough to be a pian. I cannot find anything in the preferences which would appear to cause or correct it.
It is a recent problem. I have been using iPhoto extensively for many years without any problems. I cannot recall for sure, but it may have started after my update to version 9.4.2.
Using an iMac with plenty of RAM, latest version of iPhoto 11 and Mountain Lion version 10.8.2.

What is the format of the PS photos and are there any alpha channels in them? You might try to re-edit them with PS, making some insignificant change and then saving. See if the new edit will display properly. Are you saving as jpgs with the Baseline format?
I may be preaching to the choir here but this may be of interest:
Using Photoshop or Photoshop Elements as Your Editor of Choice in iPhoto.
1 - select Photoshop or Photoshop Elememts as your editor of choice in iPhoto's General Preference Section's under the "Edit photo:" menu.
2 - double click on the thumbnail in iPhoto to open it in Photoshop. When you're finished editing click on the Save button. If you immediately get the JPEG Options window make your selection (Baseline standard seems to be the most compatible jpeg format) and click on the OK button. Your done.
3 - however, if you get the navigation window
that indicates that PS wants to save it as a PS formatted file. You'll need to either select JPEG from the menu and save (top image) or click on the desktop in the Navigation window (bottom image) and save it to the desktop for importing as a new photo.
This method will let iPhoto know that the photo has been editied and will update the thumbnail file to reflect the edit..
NOTE: With Photoshop Elements the Saving File preferences should be configured as shown:
I also suggest the Maximize PSD File Compatabilty be set to Always. In PSE’s General preference pane set the Color Picker to Apple as shown:
Note: to switch between iPhoto and PS or PSE as the editor of choice Control (right)-click on the thumbnail and select either Edit in iPhoto or Edit in External Editor from the contextual menu. If you use iPhoto to edit more than PSE re-select iPhoto in the iPhoto General preference pane. Then iPhoto will be the default editor and you can use the contextual menu to select PSE for your editor when desired.

How to create ePUB with full size images/pages to adjust according to device?

Friendly Greetings,
        I have been trying, for nigh on two months, to convert/create my 7 books that are in print into eBooks; with first publishing scheduled to be Nook, with Kindle on the eventually list. I am, sadly still working on just getting the first one published! And I could really use any assistance to get this figured out. My intent was to publish several weeks ago...now my desperation is to publish before the weather gets too warm and kids are outside most of the time...or at least no later than Easter. :0)
        First and foremost, my books are picture/poetry books for kids of all ages. They were fully designed in Photoshop, where I also created the full size images for the first eBook. I received the specifications from B&N for the various Nook devices. Under the assumption that it would be best to create the largest of the files, thus allowing smaller sized devices to adjust the page accordingly to fit and the largest would not overstretch a smaller image, I sized my pages to 1280px x 1920px at 72dpi. (now I hear 150 is standard??)
        My text is included within the image as the design is one image = one page. I included a full text only version of the story/poem at the end for those wishing to adjust text or use a voice reader. I obviously have all the original files, but for publishing they were all saved as JPGs.
        After quite a struggle and a whole lot of frustration I managed to complete the manuscript in Barnes and Noble's Nook Press Manuscript Editor. My internet is molasses and thus much of this was done in the wee hours of the morning when the rest of the time zone is asleep. I only had one page with an issue, of an extra blank line/space that was irreparable. I published, and found it was completely botched in publish, though the preview looked a-okay. Only about the top left 1/6 of each image/page was visible in either my laptop's Nook for PC or my Android Tablet's Nook App. So I agonizingly awaited another 10 hours, hoping no one would buy my book during that time, for it to be removed from sale.
        I downloaded a trial of InDesign CC, and after two weeks of not even being able to create a single new document for some screwy reason, I bought a month's subscription. So far I'm not entirely convinced of this whole Creative Cloud malarkey, especially considering...as like I said my internet is slow...it took me nearly 20 hours just download the software. (Is it really that difficult to offer disc, seriously?) After a chat and phone call I can, in theory, now use InDesign.
        I created a New Document for Digital Publishing at the aforementioned specs (1280 x 1920 px). I made the rectangle placeholders the full size of the page, and place one image per page. This usually inserted the image at about 50% and I would have to select 100% and then move as necessary in to place.
        Thus, my first question is: Is there a way to place an image at 100% without having to do that extra resizing step? Or if there is an alternative way to place the image to the full size of the page without any of those other steps that would be lovely too.
        Okay, after placing several pages/images I also selected each and went to Object Export Options and Checking the Custom Rasterization and "Resize to Text Flow". I then exported a trial ePUB to see what it would look like. On both the PC and Tablet in landscape mode it was a far cry better than the other, but about oh a 1/3 of the bottom of each page was cut off. On the tablet I rotated to portrait and voila full page. Woohoo! But alas, I don't want to limit it.
        Is there something I am doing wrong? Did I miss a step or two somewhere so that the full image will fit on the page? I feel like I'm just about to turn the page on this thing, but it's stuck to the one after that.
        I would greatly appreciate any insight, tips, help that anyone can offer. I have run the gauntlet of Barnes and Noble...cough, cough...support and apparently I ask questions which no Nook Press rep can answer and the forums over there have no clue about InDesign. It's almost as if with all the fantastic beautiful screens out there today nobody wants picture books! How does National Geographic do it?!
        Thank you very kindly.
In case it is necessary: My laptop uses Window 7 Pro 64-bit, InDesign CC is 64-bit and my 10.1 tablet uses Android. I can view the EPUB files in Nook for PC and Nook for Android. I also have Kindle, LumiRead, and various other apps on the tablet. I can also have someone preview the finished epub, if need, on a Mac, iPad, and/or Android phone...though I do not have any of these. Not sure who has a Nook I can look at though. Thanks again.

Q: Is there a way to place an image at 100% without having to do that extra resizing step?
I think here you want your images to fit in the full page size frame automatically. For this you can try the follwoing steps:
1. Create a new doc
2. Goto Object menu and choose Frame fitting options
3. Select Autofit and from Fitting drowdown, select "Fit content to frame". Refer the screenshot below:
After this you images should automatically fit in the entire page placeholder frames. Please let me know if this does not work or if the problem you are facing is different and I did not understand your problem correctly.
Regards,
Pooja

Forms Crashing Forms [32 Bit] Version 10.1.2.0.2 On Windows 7

Dear All,
Recently we have migrated all our Development PC's to Windows 7, and then after whenever we open any forms which is having more size the system is crashing. Does anybody have any solution for this .Currently we are working with XP MODE and this is also not a full proofed solution.
OS : Windows 7 Professional 32 bit
Forms Developer Version : Forms [32 Bit] Version 10.1.2.0.2
Thanks in advance.

It is likely that you are either not using a Professional release of Windows (i.e. "Home Edition") or have some other issue on your machine. Assuming you are in fact using one of the Professional releases of Win7 and believe that you have carefully followed the installation instructions which I previously mentioned, I would suggest you completely uninstall (including the manual deletion of any registry entries and directories in the file system) then reinstall. It is very important that you are in the "Administrator" group before attempting to install. The same is true when you attempt to use the Builder. Also, helpful would be to disable or relax Windows UAC before starting the installation.
As an alternative, consider installing and using Windows XP Mode (Windows Virtual PC)
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows7/install-and-use-windows-xp-mode-in-windows-7
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/virtual-pc/download.aspx

How to download the 32 bit version of Lightroom 3.3, with a Windows 7 operating system?

When I originally downloaded my version of lightroom, it was on my older computer- and the 32 bit was downloaded. Have not had any problems with it. When I re-downloaded lightroom onto my newer computer, it automatically downloaded the 64 bit version (because the new computer is Windows 7)... I didn't think any thing of it until I attempted to burn a disc and was unable to- so, it's basically useless to me.
So- I was told to uninstall the program and re-install (typing in same serial number) and to be sure to choose 32 bit this time... but i've done that and now realize that it doesn't even give me the option- just automatically downloads the 64 bit, so not sure what I am supposed to do now? I had no idea that there would be issues with newer windows operating systems!
Any advice????

And just to be totally clear, the only 'issue' with the 64bit version of LR3 was the lack of a dedicated "Burn to Jpeg" Export Preset, caused in turn by the lack of an appropriate 64-bit driver.....however, it was/is still easy enough to export to a CD/DVD using LR3 64-bit, simply by selecting the DVD drive in the Export Location field in the export dialog.
So no need to upgrade from LR3 to LR4 just to be able to burn a DVD (plenty of better reasons than that for upgrading), and also no need to downgrade LR3 from 64 bit version to 32 bit version either.

64 bit version of itunes

Am using and HP with Windows Vista. When I download itunes it tells me my installation is not complete. It tells me I can't import CD's or burn CD's. When I plug in my I phone it tells me I can't activate it, that I must uninstall itunes, and reinstall the 64 bit version of itunes. Is the 64 bit version of itunes not itunes 7.2? If not where can I get the 64 bit version?
Schtevenboy

calibur45 wrote:
Itunes does work with 64 BIT Vista/XP --- its just the iPhone and iTouch doesn't sync up because Apple has not released a driver for it
Unfortunately, I have 64BIT Vista .. and I am still waiting for Apple to hurry up and release 64-Bit Support
It get's a bit tiring to hear those without a full understanding of the issues constantly putting the onus on Apple for a lack of 64-bit Vista/XP support. I don't purport to know all of the issues, but it would bet it has more to do with MS than it does with Apple. If Microsoft were more adept at 64-bit implementation, while preserving 32 bit device driver support, this would not be an issue.
As has been the case in the past, I wouldn't doubt that MS itself has thrown technical roadblocks in Apple's way to limit, or slow, the implementation of a 64-bit version of iTunes with iPhone support. Why? To make Apple look bad and to slow the proliferation of a successful Apple product within the Windows user base. It's been proven that they've done it before and it will, no doubt, do it again. (BTW, my last statements will probably result in the pulling of my post, or this thread, as the moderators are quite even-handed in deleting posts that denigrate MS...and not just Apple.)
Every Mac OS since 10.2.7 (2003), introduced with the PowerPC G5 processors, has provided for some 64-bit hardware and software support while still providing support to 32 bit applications and hardware. Mac OS 10.5 is a full 64-bit OS, yet has virtually no issues with supporting and running 32-bit devices and applications.
64-bit MS-Windows systems often lack equivalents to software that is written for 32-bit architectures. The most severe problem is incompatible device drivers. Although most software can run in a 32-bit compatibility mode (also known as an emulation mode, e.g. Microsoft WoW64 Technology), it is usually impossible to run a driver (or similar software) in that mode since such a program usually runs in between the OS and the hardware, where direct emulation cannot be employed. Currently the 64-bit versions for many existing device drivers are not available, so using a 64-bit operating system can become frustrating as a result. The iPhone, is not unique, or alone, in it's lack of 64-bit WINDOWS only support and other support forums are rampant with similar issues with other devices. This is why many companies and individuals have rolled their Vista or XP systems back to 32-bit.
Because device drivers in operating systems with monolithic kernels, and in many operating systems with hybrid kernels, execute within the operating system kernel, it is possible to run the kernel as a 32-bit process while still supporting 64-bit user processes. This provides the memory and performance benefits of 64-bit for users without breaking binary compatibility with existing 32-bit device drivers, at the cost of some additional overhead within the kernel. This is the mechanism by which Mac OS X enables 64-bit processes while still supporting 32-bit device drivers.
Mac OS 10.5 Leopard delivers 64-bit power in one universal operating system. The Cocoa application frameworks, as well as graphics, scripting, and the UNIX foundations of the Mac, are all 64-bit. But, since it provides full performance and compatibility for 32-bit applications and drivers, there is no need to update everything on a system just to run 64-bit applications. Because of its universal nature, with OS 10.5 Leopard you don’t need a new set of drivers — or devices. New 64-bit applications work just fine with your existing printers, storage devices, and PCI cards. Even better, if you upgrade to new 64-bit-capable device drivers (when available), your 32-bit applications will also benefit from the increased throughput.
If only Microsoft were so forward thinking...

64 bit version does not support exporting to CD/DVD

The ability to burn a cd directly from LR is an extremely important feature which is not supported in the 64 bit version. Please add it to the 64 bit version to work as it does in the 32 bit version. Thanks

Lee Jay wrote:
....Anyway, opticals are largely obsolete.
How do you supply your work to your clients Lee Jay?
What a sweeping and personal comment.
I get through about 100 DVD's a month, putting out GB's of images to clients, providing proofs and originals to clients. Not one has asked me to provide the images on a flash disk or to FTP 4 Gb of high resolution TIFFS, I do FTP on occasion, but 80% of my clients dont want to chow bandwidth, and would prefer a disk or 2.
Maybe you are not a professional phtographer who supplies high resolution images to clients, but my clients dont want to FTP huge images, and won't pay for images to be supplied on flash disks.
Lee Jay wrote:
Apparently, it's an OS driver limitation, as has been discussed in the past.
This is a little more help.
If, as Lee Jay mentions that its an OS limitation which has been discussed ( somehere, but not provided a link), then you will just have to export all the photos to a folder and then burn to a disk.
I export all my photos to a folder and then I put my terms and conditions as a PDF on the disk as well as a jpeg of my card and contact details.At least the disk has information about the shoot, the photographer and T&C's.
These things should be on any disk supplied to clients, so they the images get passed around with your details on, so its not a bad thing that LR can't burn to a DVD.

Burn full size Jpegs in 64 bit version?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for