Business area correction in FSV

Hi experts,
we have some problem in Business area updation in Financial statement version. the problem arise because of the following reasons
1. After the Go Live we have created the 3KEH table & updated it in Productions server because of this cost center will update based on the business area settings.
2. After the Go Live for few weeks Business area is not mandatory while posting the documents. at the time of 3KEH table updation we made Business area also mandatory,
3. we have document spiting option also. in that we have business area as mandatory field.
so because of all this reason in the Financial statement the document which is posted earlier then this day (after go live & updation of 3KEH table) business area wise Balance sheet is not tally. & many of the document which is posted before to this day doesnt have business area in any one of the line items. say e.g. a document is have 4 line items, out this 4 line 1 or 2 line items doesnt have business area.
Document which doesn't have business area or part of business area (1 or 2 line items missing the busines area) for which vendors / customer we are not able to clear the document.
For the Financial statement we want to correct the business area details.
what could be the solutions except the reversing the entry & posting new document - which is very risky in this situation.
Thanks
Ravi

Dear,
You can not update the business area in Posted document...
The only solution is the reverse those entries and post with the business area...
Br,Vivek

Similar Messages

  • Business Area not coming in FS10N layout.

    Dear SAP Friends,
    I am working in a client where "Document Splitting" was activated on the basis of "Business Area" from the 1st August,2008. In this client their is four business areas. When I am getting the balance sheet as per Business Area in F.01 every GL shown the amount as per business area & also a some of amount is shown under the not assigned head. Amount under the not assigned is total of document of having no business area.
    Now my client wants that all not assigned amount should be distributed as per the business area & not assigned amount will come to zero.The field of business area is "GSBER".
    Now for that I am testing it on development. I have selected on document having no business area and updated the table "BSEG" for filed "GSBER" for that business area manually through ABAP. When I am seeing the same  document under FB03 the system shows the Business Area correctly which I have given in the table. But when I see the General Ledger balance in FS10N (In layout selected business area column) the same document does not give business area in that business area column. But when I select it for details it shown the business area in that document.
    Now my issue is why this is happening ? or is their any another way to do this ?
    Because i have to update all of documents of before 1st, August 2008 with no business area .
    Please give any solution ASAP & for helpful answer points will be surely awarded.
    Thanks & Regards in advance  
    Sandeep
    Edited by: Sandeep on Dec 6, 2008 11:34 AM

    Hi,
    Touching a cluster table like BSEG thru ABAP is a tricky thing.  You would need to work out all linkages to other tables for the data you are touching, would suggest a where used for field business area and update all other tables relevant to the data, like BSI* and BSA*.
    For FS10N, the data is not read from BSEG but rather from the totals tables like GLT0.
    Cheers

  • How to Define Workbook / Business Ares Security Correctly for new Users

    Hi All,
    Please could you help me understand the Security Model for Workbooks and business Areas as I believe I am very close to understanding it, but missing something important.
    Background Information:
    We are using the predefined Oracle Business Areas (Payables, Receivables, Purchasing & General Ledger) to build our reports on. These are the steps I am taking to try and assign a new user & responsibility access to the existing report.
    1. I create the Report in Discoverer Desktop under the ‘General Ledger Responsibility’ logged in as myself – assume report name = ‘Report_1’.
    2. I create a new Responsibility in Oracle Apps called ‘Discoverer Resource Coordinators’.
    3. I create a new User in Oracle Apps called ‘Joe Bloggs’ and assign the responsibility ‘Discoverer Resource Coordinators’ to the Joe.
    4. Logged in as myself in Discoverer Desktop, Responsibility ‘General Ledger’ I Share the Report (Report_1) to the new Responsibility I just created ‘Discoverer Resource Coordinators’.
    5. In Discoverer Administration, Security, I assign the new Responsibility ‘Discoverer Resource Coordinators’ to the predefined Oracle Business Areas (Payables, Receivables, Purchasing & General Ledger).
    6. In Discoverer Administration I set privileges so that the Responsibility ‘Discoverer Resource Coordinators’ can do all tasks, query data, administer. .etc. etc..
    7. I therefore believe everything has been done and attempt to Login and run the report under Joe Bloggs, but am unable to retrieve any data.
    Help… what am I missing!
    Thanks,
    Lance
    Message was edited by:
    Lance

    Dear All,
    This has now been adjusted according to your recommendations but to no avail.
    Myself and Lance have ensured that this new responsibility has unlimited access to all the existing Business areas to eliminate joins within folders not being recognised, we have also ensured that the workbooks that have been created are shared with the correct responsibility.
    I have thoroughly tested this set up by logging in as this new responsibility within Disco. Client to try and retrieve data in a new Workbook, but even for the simplest of queries this fails.
    It seems that there may be a problem with the Responsibility linking to the EUL, could this be due to the new responsibility being created after the Current EUL was set up?
    Does anyone have any information or knowledge where this could happen?
    Regards
    Si

  • Business Area is not getting updated in "Main Bank Account" Line item (FF_5

    Hi Gurus,
    I am executing T Code: FF_5 for uploading the "Multi-Cash" Format. This transaction clears the Bank Clearing Account and post the entry to the credit of "Bank Main Account".
    Now while i had executed F110, the Business area was properly captured in the Bank Clearing Account Line item. But while executing FF_5, the Business Area is not getting captured against the "Main Bank Account" Line item.
    Can you please tell me how to capture the Business Area against the "Main Bank Account" Line item.
    Rgds,
    Prasad.

    Hi,
    1. In case of Business where payments are made centrally it is important to report
        Bank A/c Business area wise.
    2. However I have solved the problem by doing "Sustitution", and its working fine. The Business Area is getting updated against the Main Bank Account Line item.
    3. I am however getting one error while doing the upload in FF_5. The error occurs
       only if Business Area is a "required" field in Bank Account's "Field Status
       Group".
       Error: (00 298) Formatting error in the field COBL-GSBER ; see next message.
       But if I make Business Area as an Optional Field I am not getting an error and
       also the posting is done to Main Bank Account.
    Is there anyother method by which this error can be corrected.
    I have assigned 2 points for your inputs. Can you help me to solve this error as well.
    Rgds
    Prasad

  • Customer Open Items by segments or Business Area

    Dear All
    Good Morning
    We would like to discuss one issue which may be other companies also facing related to New General Ledger. We book one vendor liabity which belong to two Business Area or Segment. Now we enter vendor line item only once and do not enter the business area in vendor line item. Document is posted and vendor line item is without business area. But if we see GL view document reconciliation account is splitted in two business area based on expense propotionate. which is correct but still our problem is that when we run the vendor report by business area this vendor line item will be shown without business area.
    Can any one have a solution for this problem
    Thanks and Best Regards

    Hi Ravi,
    SAP will pick these invoices for payment according to vendor open items which are due according to payment terms.
    When it comes to customer invoices, clearing depends on when customer pays payment to particular invoice, these customer invoices will get cleared.
    I assume you are talking more closely to intercompany scenario (If it is not intercompany invoices clearing, you should not worry mostly about customer invoices clearing), where you want to clear vendor invoices and customer invoices. So you need to incorporate entry date in your functionality to pick intercompany invoices clearing.
    Thanks much
    Raghu Kolla

  • Removing the business area from the WBS element

    Hi Experts,
    I have created the WBS element with business area. Then created the PR against that WBS element , converted the PR's to PO's.
    Now I want to remove the business area from WBS element.
    Now as Business area field become grayed out hence I canot remove the Business area from WBS element.
    Hence I have cancelled the PO's then Cancelled the PR's. So now there is no actual cost & no commitment exists against the WBS element.
    But still Business area field is grayed out for that WBS element.
    Could you please let me know how to remove the business area in this case ???
    Regards,
    Pradip

    Hi,
    Once BA is grayed out then you can not change the same, this is sap std. behavior. Here you can lock the existing wbse which having wrong BA to avoid further actual postings.
    Create new wbse with correct BA & then create pr & po.
    Regards,
    Sandeep

  • Error while posting billing document - Error belongs to Business area/G/L a

    Hi All,
    When i am posting the billing document i ma getting below error message:
    Business Area must be entered, Pl check if the Business Area is correct Message no. ZT017
    I think it is due to MWST tax condtion type and respective G/L account only.
    When i post 17% tax of MWST i am able to post it - it is having one G/L account,
    When i post 5% tax of MWST, i am not able to post it - Different G/L Account - I am getting above error.
    Please suggest us to proceed further.
    Regards
    Lakshmikanth

    Hi Lakshmipathi,
    This is not at all related to VKOA settings, because the G/L account determination through OB40 here. But every thing is in place. A1 tax code with XXXXXX G/L account is working fine, A2 tax code with YYYYY G/L account is not working fine. If change A2 tax code G/L account to XXXXXX, it is working fine. Here only with YYYYY G/L account issue,
    The error details already available in this thread.
    Thanks and Regards
    Lakshmikanth

  • Account assignment not possible (Asset not assigned to a business area)

    HI
    While posting an asset acquisition through F-90 by entering Business area, doc.type AA,TT-100,PK-70, i am getting the error messege AA483 - "Account assignment not possible (Asset not assigned to a business area)".
    I have correctly created asset master and assigned Business area and Cost centre.
    And i am not getting any problem in another company code for same asset class.
    Please suggest
    Bhanu Prakash

    Hello
    Assets are assigned to a single business area in their master record. Every posting to an asset balance sheet account is automatically posted to that business area. The business area for an asset is passed on to all line items connected with the asset. Therefore you do not need to make a manual account assignment for a business area at any point.
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/5f/1fac7c4aee11d189740000e8322d00/frameset.htm
    Check the info on the link please
    Reg
    assign points if useful

  • How can I make Business area field optional in MIRO

    Hi,
    whyle posting invoice the system is asking business area as required input.
    I don't want to put business area.
    Is there any way to avoid this ?
    I don't want to change, spro settings.
    How can I avoid business area in MIRO?
    waiting for your input..
    Thank you,
    Marella.

    check the GL accounts field status variant attached to the Invoice posting.
    also check in PO whether u have the BA field filled up. in case u r using BA accounting then that value shld be there..... as u said u dont want to put BA as field in miro , that means u r not using BA thing... so u can always maintain all the FSV of GL for BA as optional/supressed...

  • Business Area and Profit Center In Document Splitting

    Hi,
    We are using Business area and Profit Center characteristics for document splitting.
    In one transaction, the Business area and profit centers are defaulted through the cost center.
    The document is successfully split in respect of the business area, but the profit center is not filled, thereby giving error while posting.
    Please suggest.

    Hi,
    Actually, we have all three scenarios, profit center, segment and business area..
    As suggested, we have checked all field status relevant.. profit center is optional in all cases..
    Now, Pls consider the scenario without business area in document splitting characteristics..
    If I post an expense, profit center is picked thru cost center and segment thru profit ctr. The vendor or bank line item inherits the characteristic values from the previous line item.
    Now, in addition we have business areas in doc splitting characteristics.
    Business area, again is populated thru cost centers, along with profit ctr and segment.
    The business area gets correctly populated in the vendor line item.. but the profit center doesnt.
    Please let us know the reason..
    Edited by: Swapvik on Mar 23, 2009 4:07 PM

  • Cost centre without business area

    Hi All,
    I have document splitting with business area and profit centre mandatory, along with this i have configured business area wise FSV in OBY6.
    We have  configured 10 business areas and 5 profit centres, but i have  created cost centres without business area and i dontwant to create cost centres with business area becoz junk master data in system and no control to users. also i have done configuration in OKB9 for automatic posting expences account with the combination of valuation area-business area- & cost centre, but when we are posting any financial document though MM or SD transactions like PGI or MIGO for service, system is not allowing to post financial document without business area cost centres. Error "Business Area XXXX / Cost centre XXXX is not assigned".
    After all analysis i came to know that, if we have cost centre with business area then only we can move with this set of configuration. Is it right?
    In No. what need to be done. basically we dont want to create cost centres for all Business Area
    Thanks in Advance,
    Sahil

    Hi,
    If you are not ready to maintain BA in CC master you should write Substitution / you should maintain derivation rule for deriving business area.
    Regards,
    Viswa

  • Printing of cheque under company code instead of business area

    hai sap gurus
    pls help us in this issue
    At the time of running automatic payment program separate cheques were printing to a single vendor as per business area, now the client is asking that single cheques is to be issue to the vendor under company code instead of business area wise, but the same vendor is supplying the material to those business area.  Can we make the settings as per the requirement?
    many thanks in advance
    bye for now
    kishore

    Dear Kishore,
    I understand that your company wants to pay a vendor one cheque irrelevant of multiple business area transactions. If my understanding is correct, this can be handled by removing the tick in pay per business area
    Step
    transaction code - FBZP
    Tab                    - Paying company code.
    Control Data      - Remove the tick from Seperate payment   per business area.
    Hope this helps you.
    Regards,
    Nathan.

  • Business area in service tax

    Hi
    In India service tax liability amount is derived based on regional (UWK) sale/purchase .
    Service tax GLs are not updated with business area at entry level.But business place is updated against each line items.
    At the time of payment against clearing with open item , one UWK get all open items .
    Hence it is difficult to identify his/her own UWK for clearing those line items with payment. I have checked the possibility of filtering with business area but not by business place.
    Is there any way to search open items at the time of clearing with business place ? customized screen selection is possible for filtering purpose ?
    nishu

    Do you mean VAT by saying service tax? If VAT, you are correct, VAT lines do not have business area information. It is available by using New GL.
    F.5D F.5E Business Area adjustment may provide similar effect by offset balancing, but this is only summary basis, may not be line by line.
    Strict usage like F.03, New GL would not be sufficient to your requirement. New GL doesn't work with clearing screens, it only work behind FI transactions.
    But the overall need i.e. division balance sheet would be realized either way (F.5E or New GL).

  • Business Area field should not get translate while doing allocations in co

    Dear All,
    In ecc 6.0 when we will be allocating expenses through assessment and Distribution the system credits sender cost center and debits receiver cost center,the same will be applicable for Business Area also.
    But my client is having plant =business area for which they are making financial statements business area wise.
    The client wants its business area not to get affected by above allocations ,Is there any method of restricting costs to remain in same business area and not getting translated to another business area.
    Example :                    cost center           profit center           business area
    expenses                      1011                   1001                     101
    allocation from cctr to cctr 1012 which is having pctr 1002 and business area 102
    expenses                      1012                   1002                       102
    So my requirement is the system should not update business area 102
    Thanks and regards
    vijay

    Hi Vijay,
    Profit Center is derived basing on Assignments. If you have assigned a Profit Center in the Cost Center Master
    Data, obviously for whatever the postings that take place in that Cost Center, will be posted to Profit Center also
    (Statistical).
    In your case, Cost Center 1011 and 1012 have been assigned to different Profit Centers 1001 and 1002. So,
    conceptually what the system is doing is correct.
    You want to restrict the postings to happen to Business Areas. I suggest you, this is not problem of
    stopping/restricting the transaction postings but You have to restructre your Cost Centers and Profit Centers.
    It's rather a Business Process / Structure change required than technical requirement in the system by restricting
    the postings.
    Pls revert back for further discussion...
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Business area not appearing in Accounting document of 543's materail doc

    Hello ,
    We have created new plant CN06 (and assigend to Company code CN06) by copying existing plant CN03 (assigned to Company code CN03). Business area CN06 was defined and assigned to plant CN06 and valuation area. When we do normal GR document business area appears in material document but when we are doing GR for sub contracting (posting key 81) with movement type 543 Business area doesnt appear in the material doc .
    In cancellation of Subcontracting material document for plant CN06(Movement type 544) Business area appears properly . We are unable to analyse the issue.
    We have checked field status through RM07CUFA program , there wn't be any mismatch.  Please required your help.
    Regards
    Mahesh Naik

    Hello ,
    We have checked
    please check the for the sales area have u assigned rule (2 or 1) or not in t-code OVF2.----- Rule assigned is -1
    please check business area is assigned to plant & division in t-code OVF0----correct assignment is there
    please check assignment of business area to sales area OVF1.--correct assignment is there .
    Still we are facing problem.
    Regards
    Mahesh Naik

Maybe you are looking for