Business area problem in MIRO

Hi Gurus,
In my client place they using business areas, there three business areas created 8100 , 8200,8300
OMJ7 business area assigned to plant.
In miro one of the materai the business area it is taking 8100 it is correct , but where in tha miro
Suncontract charges it is taking 8200 business area, for all subcontract charges it is taking 8200 only,
IN OKB9 also this subcontract gl-cost element assigned three business areas an plnat, but still in case
of subcontract charges it is taking single business area that to it is 8200 only, it is not taking based on plant, this creating a problem, how i solve this issue,
Please advice me.
Regards
Sreenivas.P

Hi
Check is there any substitution written in this case.
Goto TCODE :GGB4
search withe Business area field is there any substitution written.
SKS

Similar Messages

Business Area missing in MIRO

Hi all,
I am facing problem with business area in MIRO. when I check MIRO for a PO and click on follow-on documents then it shows business area for few items but for some items its missing, please help me to solve the problem
rgds,
Shweta

Hi Shweta,
I cannot get the details of FS00 as mentioned by you as I am not linked to your server now.
The GR/IR Clearing account is a centralized clearing and reconciliation account which works like a bridge
which is getting debited on procurement and reversed during MIRO and is not linked to any Business Area.
It is a Balance Sheet account which reveals the nature of goods received by your Plant whatever may be
the storage location. If the inventory account is there, it will show for which business area you have
purchased. During MIRO the GR/IR account becomes nil and it is an automatic internal posting through OBYC
assignment. The other accounts will be vendor account which may carry BA classifications. Hope you are clear.
Best Regards,
Sadashivan

Posting intercompany items in FB01 (business area problem)

Hi guys,
Have you tried posting intercompany items in FB01?
My problem occured when i tried to post concur documents in FB01.
In line item1, i didn't enter a business area.
In line item2, i entered business area 0005.
I clicked simulation.
The business area in line item 1 is now populated with 0005.
When i debug the program, item 1's business area was populated because of OSS notes 566083.
I look for OSS notes that may solve this problem but i haven't found any.
I considered using the substitution exit that is called before simulation, but i'm afraid it might cause conflict in other modules!
Help.
Any suggestion is highly appreciated.
warm thanks,
navi

Hi Prabhu,
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts.
Yes, i ikow I can manipulate the business area's value in a substitution exit.
But the problem is, the OSS note was called after the line item passed through the substitution exit.
Meaning the filling-up of the BA happens after the program executed the substitution exit.
It could have solved the problem if the substitution exit comes after the OSS note but its not the case, so I really can't use that exit.
I search for another exits that occurs when simulation was ticked, but there's none.
I asked my functional to ask SAP for OSS notes that may solve this problem and I am also conducting thorough investigation in my end.
Do you have any other idea regarding this problem?
Thanks again so much in advance.
Navi

FI/CO Posting - Business Area Problem

Hi all,
I am running PC00_M99_CIPE program.
Business areas seem to accurate that consisting of payroll document . But business areas is all the same within the FI document.
What causes this problem? (user-exit? customizing? OSS-Note?)
Can you help me please.
Best Regards.

Sir,
Wat is the Sap FI Procedure for Transfer Posting of Costs booke from one BA to another
eg. Suppose while doing any transaction business area 4500 should be picked but instead of 4500 business area 7000 is being assigend which is wrong the correct busines area should be 4500. so it is not possible all the time to reverse the enter so wat is the procedure to assign the correct businee Area
Suppose the transaction like Payment Posting Excise Cenvat Posting etc..
So please suggest
Urgent Help required
Juhi

Business Area at MR8M - MIRO Invoice

I have posted IV - MIRO based on PO, but while reversing the MIRO document - MR8M, the system is not taking the Business area at line item of taxes GL (Excise clearing and VAT).
Pls advice.

Mu question has not answred

BADI - ac_document for Non Business Area updation in MIRO - Manual entry

Hi,
We have customised the above badi to Zac_document1 and implemented successfully in our system. It is working correctly and giving proper / expected result except while doing the manual G/L entry in MIRO (In some of the scenarios).
In our Production system, one of the end user has generated a MIRO document in reference to a PO. In actual Invoice there were miscellaneous charges added by the party (Vendor), but not mentioned those in PO. End User has adjusted those charges by debiting the required tax G/L - u201CAP-CG Deduct-VATu201D account (In G/L Tab - in MIRO) and crediting the same amount to Material (In material tab of MIRO) that was used in PO.
While debiting the amount to G/L u2013 u201CAP-CG Deduct-VATu201D account, End User has not put the Business Area (In G/L Tab u2013 MIRO) which in turn result into entry in "Non Business Area" for the "G/L - AP-CG Deduct-VAT" irrespective of BADI was active in the system to update the business Area.
Could anybody suggest me the possibilities of non-picking up the Business Area in the line item of manual entry (In G/L tab of MIRO) entered in MIRO.
FI document is getting generated properly with updation of Business Area in all other scenarios (i.e. MIRO & SD Billing generation).
Points will be assigned to proper answer.
Regards,
Shridhar Sawant

Closing the issue from my side since there was inconsistancy in coding at our end.
Regards,
Shridhar

Business Area Mandatory in MIRO

DearAll,
While doing MIRO , Business Area is mandatory , we need to change the same , please letus know how can we do thesame.
Thanks & Regards
Sameer Chitre

This should have been posted in Financial forum. Check in OBC4.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Suggestions needed for Export/Import Business Area Problem

I'm trying to export/import a Business Area from one instance to another and I get the following error during import processes.
Database Error - ORA-00001: unique constraint (EUL4_US.EUL4_EXP_PK) violated
The Business Area I'm trying to import doesn't exists in new instance. During the import wizard I've checked refresh existing object and match by identifiers.
I think my target instance has objects with same identifiers, so I went ahead and changed the identifiers in my source, but still problem persists. How can I correct this error?
Thanks

Did you happen to copy the EUL from one database to another before you were importing/exporting the BA?
Discoverer recognizes EULs using unique reference numbers. However, if you use the database export and import utilities to copy an EUL, the new EUL (including its reference number) will be identical to the original EUL. When EULs have the same reference number, EUL consistency issues can arise if you do both of the following:
* If you modify objects in both the original EUL and in the new EUL
* Having modified objects in both EULs, if you then attempt to copy objects between the two EULs using the Discoverer Export Wizard and Import Wizard (or the Discoverer /export and /import commands)
To avoid potential EUL consistency issues, run the eul5_id.sql script as the owner of the new EUL. The eul5_id.sql script gives a new refererence number to the new EUL and thereby avoids any potential EUL consistency issues.
Reference
* How to import an EUL using the standard database import utility
http://download-west.oracle.com/docs/html/B13916_04/maintain_eul.htm#i1008632
For 4i, you will ned to run:
sql> update EUL4_VERSIONS set VER_EUL_TIMESTAMP =TO_CHAR(SYSDATE, 'YYYYMMDDHH24MISS');
sql> commit;
Some similar EUL inconsistencies are documented in:
Note.267476.1 Discoverer Workbook Fails With 'Cannot join tables.Item dependency "" not found in EUL' After EUL Migration, Importing Or Cloning
You might want to check that if the EUL version timestamps are the same.
~Steve.

Business area problem

Sir in tcode VA01 i am getting following error :-
No business area can be determined for item 000010
Messagae no. V1599
Diagnosis
The system could not determine a business area for item 000010. The item has plant AMBA and is assigned to company code ARP for which a business area is required. This is caused by incomplete settings in Customizing.
System response
The system does not allow you to create the item.
Procedure
Before creating the item, make sure that you have completely maintained business area assignments in Customizing.
In which tcode i will have to do customization?
I wait on line.

Hi,
This because the determination rule is not maintained.
If you maintain the determination rule then system will pick up the business based on plant /division
or otherwise based on sales area.
If your triggering the business area based on plant and division then u need to give the rule 1.
T.code:IMG
Enterprise structure>Assignment>Sales and Distribution>Business Area Account Assignment>Define Rules by Sales Area.
1--> based on plant and division
2--> based on Sales Area
3-->Based on Sales Org/distribution channel and division.
Regards
Saju

Business area problem in vf01

Hi,
we have implemented business area concept on 01.04.2008 onwards. previuos year in 2007 we have some sales order pending but while doing billing it is not taking the business area which are sales order created in 2007 financial year.but what are the sales order created in current year 2008 for this it is taking. please help me in this issue .
it is very urgent.

Business area is derived from the config assignment per sales area or plant.
SPRO>Enterprise Structure>Assignment>Sales and Distribution>Business Area Account Assignment. You may allocate business area based on sales area; Have you explored that way?

Automatic Picking of Business Area in MIRO

Hello SAP Gurus,
I have the following problem while making MIRO after MIGO.
While I am doing MIRO after I entered the all relavant data the system is asking Business Area field in Details Button becz it is mandatory field on Vendor Reconciliation G a/c.But my client is asking instead entering every time business area while making MIRO they want to pick this automatically,
How can I do this ? Is there is any special customization I have top make for this.
Plz suggest becz it is very urgent and I will give you full credit for this.
Thanx,

Hi,
OB65 Enable Business Area Balance Sheet
OBXM Define Accounts for Subsequent Adjustment
In the transaction OBXM you fill in the g/l account (creditor / debitor) and the ofset account. The postings are only on the ofset account!
When you are using PCA these account should not be set up in 3KEH Choose Additional Balance Sheet and P&L Accounts !!
Paul

Business Place & Business Area in VAT Line item in MIRO

Hi Gurus,
I want to defualt the following values in the VAT line item in while doing MIRO.
1. Business place in the "VAT line item" to be defaulted from the "Vendor Line item".
2. Business area in the "VAT line Item" to be defaulted from its relevant "Material / Expense/ GR/IR Line item".
The same thing i have done in FB60 transaction by using a BADI. But the same BADI is not working for MIRO.
What the BADI does it goes and updates the BSEG table for the fields "Bupla (Business Place) & GSBER(Business Area).
But while doing MIRO the BSEG table is not called at all and hence the BADI which is used earlier is not able to update the fields and hence cannot be used.
I feel the reason could be that while doing MIRO the BSEG table is not called directly but it is called through a Function Module. In such case a BADI will be required which will call the relevant Function module.
Need your help in how to update the VAT Line Item's Business Place & Business Area in the MIRO document.
Will award points if issue is resolved or if your answer is useful.
Rgds
Prasad

Hi
Try using substitution maintained in FI.Transaction code OBBH.
Maintain the prerequisite based on the Transaction code.
Copy the same logic used in BAdi for the exit created.
We have used this for similar type of requirements
Award points if useful
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Business area not picking up for substitution...

Hi
I have created susbstitution for GL account..for substituting business area for GL account....(tax GL account
Tax line item is automatically created in document.....i want business area to be pickep up for the same.
We want substitution create for Business area updating ;- When Document has 4 line item at the time of TAX and TDS line item the Business area not update, MIRO Document also not update the Business area.
Please reply
thanks

Dear Vijay,
Please kindly read the SAP note number 199886 Business area in tax line
In the value-added tax line items, the field "Business area" is NEITHER
automatically filled NOR can you enter a value manually.
Postings to VAT accounts must be made WITHOUT business area. The reason
for this is that the field "Business area" does NOT exist in the tax
data. Therefore,the advance return for tax on sales/purchases can also
only generate postings WITHOUT business area and these postings must
correspond exactly to the original tax postings in your account
assignments. Otherwise, the tax accounts would have steadily increasing
business area balances.
Unfortunately I must inform you that the business area is not available
for substitution because it can cause inconsistences in AM,CO and MM
modules.
Substituting the B.A.field is a modification to the standard SAP
system. To make the business area field substitutable you must have
written an ABAP to update table GB01 for the GSBER field, this is
all explained in SAP note 42615.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

MIRO - Business Area not getting updated in Vendor Line item

Hello friends,
I am posting Vendor invoice in MIRO transaction.
After Posting if i see the financial document generated,
Business area has not got updated in Vendor Line item.
What could be the problem ?
Please help me out.
Hari Prasath

Hi Kale,
Make sure the field Business area is not supressed in tx. OB14. for the GL account in line item 001.
On the other hand, have a look to the note and kba below:
41294 - Business area in customer/vendor item
Kba 1727802 - Business area not getting populated in sales/ purchase tax

Customisd err message at MIRO - Business area V/s company code validation

Hi experts,
We have simple validation for company code V/S Business area check in place ,
While doing MIRO system throws error for a particular company code and Business area
combination the set error message ( customized - Business are does not match with company code)
This validation has given as a sub node (step) of another consolidation trx. types against GL validation (that was in place earlier, thats why)
But when we do through F-02 (Journal entry ),F-43(vendor invoice), F-22(customer invoce) for the same combination system passes the entry !!!
what may be the cause ?
the error message is the standard one set -251 this message is custom created at Validation (GGB0)
Business area doesnt belongs to the company code
Message no. /ASU/GENERAL251
One more thing Noticed
The Material PO is a account assigned (K) cost center and the
cost center Business area is 1003.
In PO plant is 1003 and i checked the MSEG the plant shows 1003
But in Logistics assignment the Business area 1001 is tagged to Plant 1003
not THE BUSINESS AREA 1003 !! . I mean at plant/valuation area to Business ara configuration
the valuation area 1003 is assigned to Business are 1001 not to Busienss are 1003!!!
Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 1:42 PM
Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 1:43 PM

Hi
thankx for the reply,
there is no exit/ set for validation here
I have done like this
Pre requisite
company code = xxxxx
Check
Business area = xxxx or BA = XXXXXX or BA = XXXXX ......
Message
E Message class /ASU/GENERAL
251
Business area doesnt belongs to the company code
Message variables
1 BSEG - GSBER
The t codes like F-43 AND f-02 1003 cc TO 1003 BA is perfectly working !!! our problem is at MIR7/MIRO
only there the error pops up even the combination is allowed in the above mentioned validation??
Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 2:03 PM
Edited by: melgibson on Feb 15, 2012 2:04 PM

Business area problem in MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for