Business Functions concept in JD Edwards.

Can u please explain me the Business Functions concept in JD Edwards.
Thank you..

hi,
check the following Blogs,
part -I /people/yomeshp.sharma/blog/2006/06/01/integrating-jdedwards-system-with-xi-using-iway-adapter-part--i
part -II /people/yomeshp.sharma/blog/2006/06/01/integrating-jdedwards-system-with-xi-using-iway-adapter-part--ii
part -III /people/yomeshp.sharma/blog/2006/05/31/integrating-jdedwards-system-with-xi-using-iway-adapter-part--iii
These shouild help you out.
Regards
Sreeram.G.Reddy

Similar Messages

  • Debug JD Edwards "C' Business Function setup for Vistual Studio 2008

    Please can anyone send me the setup for Debug JD Edwards "C' Business Function with Vistual Studio 2008
    using C:\e812\system\bin32\activConsole.exe

    You don't need any setup; just build the bsfn in debug mode, exit form jde, run VS2008, opne the jde solution file, set a brekpoint into your bsfn and it works.

  • Help on Business Function "Reporting Financials 2" and its impact

    Hi All,
    I am looking at 'SAP Help' for Reporting Financials 2 (EhP4).
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/6a/cd7dbd74694af3ac13b3c24a10def4/frameset.htm
    basically I want to use the standard extractor 0FI_AA_20 FI-AA: Transactions and Depreciation . when i try to run the extractor i get an error saying: Business Function "Reporting Financials 2" is not switched on
    In order to use the new data sources the pre requisites are:
    1. SAP Enhancement Package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0
    2. Activated the Reporting Financials 2 business function.
    The EnP4 is already implemented what i have do next is to activate the business function.
    Can any one help me with more details on what all gets activated with this business function 'Reporting Financials 2' and its impact.
    With Best Regards
    Shilpa.

    Hi,
    in SFW5 you can get an overview over the business functions. There you could activate the appropriate Business Function.
    But I would recommend you strongly before to read some information and documentation about business functions and the enhancement package concept.
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Business Function Set: Enterprise AddOns in Solution Manager

    Hello
    For testing purposes I want to activate the Enterprise AddOn EA_PLM in transaction SFW5 inside a Solution Manager 4 installation but no Enterprise AddOn is available. Additionally there is only one Business Function Set called "telco reference pack" with two Business Functions. Do I have to set up something before I can active the Enterprise AddOns? I thought PLM is part of the Solution Manager 4 installation.

    Hello Marc,
    the Solution Manager consists "only" of an CRM-component, the SolMan component itself and the Netweaver 2004s platform. So no PLM (and no Enterprise AddOn) is available. SolMan coves some functionalities of Software Lifecycle Management, but does not include the PLM coding itself. For EA_PLM you need an ERP system.
    Best regards, Alexander

  • Business packages, Business Functions and Business Components

    Dear All,
    I am new to ESS/MSS.
    We are going to implement the following applications. (Company is Indian based).
    Version : EHP6 and Portal 7.3
    1. Employee Search
    2. Personal Information
    2. Working Time
    3. Benefits and Payments (Reimbursements, Salary Advance, URL iviews have to create for PF and ESI)
    4.Travel Management (No 3rd party integration for booking tickets)
    5. Performance Management Systems (360* Degree Appraisal)
    6. E- Separation
    7. Corporate Information
    8. E- Recruitment
    9. MSS
    What are the Business Packages have to deploy?
    What are the Business Functions have to deploy?
    What are the Business Components have to deploy?
    Regards
    Somu

    What are the Business Packages have to deploy?
    In portal side you need to deploy the below packages.
    ->  BP ERP05 ESS 1.41
    ->  BP ERP05 MSS 1.51
    ->  BP ERP05 COMMON PARTS 1.51
    -> BPERPESSWDA1.50
    ->  BP MSS ADDON 1.0
    -> BP Recruiter
    -> BP Recruiter Administrator
    If you want implement TMS applications then you required below BP's
    ->  BP ERP TMS 1.51              
    ->  BP ERP05 TALENT DEV 1.01
    And the components should be SP level compatibility with SAP ECC system
    -> SAP ESS
    -> SAP MSS
    -> SAP PCUI_GP
    What are the Business Functions have to deploy?
    You need to activate the below BF's in ECC HR system
    HCM_ESS_CI_1
    HCM_ESS_WDA_1 
    HCM_ESS_WDA_2
    HCM_MSS_WDA_1
    HCM_MSS_WDA_2
    FIN_TRAVEL_1
    FIN_TRAVEL_2
    FIN_TRAVEL_3
    HCM_ASR_CI_1
    HCM_ASR_CI_2
    HCM_ASR_CI_3
    HCM_ECM_CI_1
    HCM_ECM_CI_2
    HCM_LSO_CI_1
    HCM_LSO_CI_2
    HCM_LSO_CI_3
    HCM_OSA_CI_1
    HCM_OSA_CI_2
    HCM_PD_UI_1
    HCM_TMC_CI_1
    HCM_TMC_CI_2
    CA_HAP_CI_1
    HCM_OSA_CI_1
    HCM_OSA_CI_2
    HCM_TMC_CI_1
    HCM_TMC_CI_2
    HCM_HCP_CI_1
    HCM_ECM_CI_2
    HCM_ERC_CI_4
    HCM_PD_UI_1
    FIN_CO_MSSBUA_NWBC
    FIN_REP_SIMPL_1
    ERP_ENTERPRISESEARCH
    What are the Business Components have to deploy?
    In ECC side import the addon components based on your system component levels.
    MSS Addon 1.0
    ERECRUTIMENT

  • Business Functions of type Validation/Constraint not used when defined in the Glossary

    Hi,
    the problem is the following: in the Glossary, we have some Business Rules defined. They are of type Validation or Constraint and shall be used to validate the data in the system. These Business Rules are used in Domains in a CDM model.
    From that CDM model we are generating a PDM model (for HANA, but it's not working for any of the databases available for selection). Now: I would expect, as this has been defined in the CDM, the Business Rules replicated in the PDM model and used as constraints.
    This is unfortunately working only for Business Functions, which are directly defined in the CDM model, not for those ones, defined in the Glossary and reused in the CDM model.
    Working case:
    - define Business Rule in CDM
    - define Domain in CDM and assign Business Rule
    - assign the domain to a attribute
    - generate PDM from the CDM model
    - the Business Rule is replicated in the PDM model, the check constraint for the table is generated correctly
    NOT working case:
    - define Business Rule in Glossary
    - define Domain in CDM and assign the Business Rule from the Glossary
    - assign the domain to a attribute
    - generate PDM from the CDM model
    - the Business Rule is NOT replicated in the PDM model, the check constraint for the table is MISSING
    Do you think it's a bug, or am I doing something wrong?
    P.S.
    We are on 16.5 SP05
    Thanks,
    Rafal

    Looks like a bug to me; I would expect the source of the rule to be irrelevant, assuming the PDM has access to the relevant metadata at the time of generation. Perhaps Glossary shortcuts don't have access to all the metadata?

  • How to create business functions and expose as webservice?

    Hi...
      How to use Java to create business functions and expose that as a webservice.

    Hi Leela,
    Can you please post the answer to the question posed?
    We are also looking for a similar implementation in our integration and would really appreciate any help.
    Regards

  • Fi Invoice workflows - using Business Functions

    Dear Experts,
    Please provide the list of business functions to be activated for MM & FI integration for automatic clearing of down payment or automatic capture of vendor details for vendor payment.
    My Client requirement is as follows.
    My Client organization having decentralized system where invoice entry and payment entry will be generated by the respective department and verification & posting the same will be done by the Finance department.
    PR & PO will be raised by the respective departments, during the invoice verification they want to clear the vendor down payment. However, Finance department wants to have two levels of approvals for down payment and balance payment (save the entry) to vendor for each department and two more levels of approvals for posting the down payment and balance payement.
    Please advise.

    Hi Asripati,
                      In FI do the settings as Check calculation Procedure(spro-f.ac-f.ac global settings-Taxon sales/purchases-basic settings-check calculation procedure and do all the settings for Automatic clearing of down payment do the settings at Tcode-OB40 or OBYC and create 3 GL accounts at  FS00-inventory r.m/gr/ir clearing ac(Select Post automatically)/rawmeterial consumption/c.
    Cheers====
    Sridhar

  • Add Horizontal Layout in Business Functions

    Hi,
    I would like to customize the Business Function layout.
    The goal is to get something like that:
    I'm trying to achieve this by changing the display preferences for Business Function -> Advances -> Customize Content, but for some reason it's not working.
    We are running on 16.5 SP03 PL02
    This is what I typed in:
    I would expect, After the Activity ID, I get a horizontal tab with Frequency and Role associated. But it's not the case ... What I get instead is this:
    Question: Am I doing something wrong, or does this function not work for Business Functions in SP03 PL02?
    Same applies to Comments for Tasks in Business Process Diagrams ... even though, the Comments are set to be displayed ... they don't appear.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Rafael

    Hi George,
    no, saying 'task', I meant an BPMN Activity -> Task/User Task/....
    I can force PD to display the comments, but only if I change the current process language to -> Analysis, then a 'Task' converts into a 'Process' and the comments do appear:
    So the question is: is it a bug or is it a 'feature' of BPMN? Or maybe a process in Analysis is not the same as a Task in BPMN ... and I can't set any properties for Tasks in PD... but then ... why does it convert? Task into Process and vice versa?
    Once I change the current process language back to -> BPMN 2.0, they dissapear from the diagram.

  • Any problem if we use Business area concept other than Profit Centr

    Hi,
    what are the problems and difficulties if we use Business area concept other than Profit Center.
    Kindly give me brief deatils,,,will assign points
    thanks
    Sap Guru
    kischowdary*gmail.com

    Hi:
    Business area will not be supported by SAP in the future
    The problem of splitting of account balance is more pertinent in case of tax accounts.
    In month end procedures, there are big problem in reconciliation.
    Not Efficient  in Reporting.
    SAP Recommends Profit Center Accounting instead of Business area
    Please let me know if you need more information.
    Assign points if useful.
    Regards
    MSReddy

  • EHP4 - Business Function - FIN_REP_SIMPL_2

    Hi,
    I´m in Petrobras and I have a doubt about the reports generated after the activations of the business function FIN_REP_SIMPL_2 - Reporting Financials 2.
    I Would like to now where I can or I will look the reports? What ne next steps that I heve to do to have, to see the reports on the portal and the address of the portal?
    I´m looking for a documentation about the activation of these business function X Portal (acess) on SAP´s site, but I have not success, can you help me?
    Thanks In advance,
    Best regards,

    Hi Egberto,
    You can find the business function document, containing links to information on the individual reports, here: http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/en/6a/cd7dbd74694af3ac13b3c24a10def4/content.htm
    Best regards,
    John

  • How to activate the business function HCM and HCM_LSO_CI_2

    Hi!
    To use the role of course administrator 1.4, we have to activate the business function HCM, Learning Solution 02 (HCM_LSO_CI_2).
    On IMG, I do not see about HCM_LSO_CI_2. Could you tell me the right way to do that?
    Please help.
    Thanks!

    Hi Linda
    You should be able to active business functions through SFW5 T code or by executing the very first (top) node in SPRO.
    Hope this helps
    Best Regards
    Reddy

  • Business function Activation

    Hi All,
    Wanted to understand what would be the impact activating business function "FIN_TRAVEL_2" for Travel management.
    Presently we are on FIN_TRAVEL_1 and EHP6. Wanted to have both Travel request and Travel expense report output view though PR05.
    As FIN_TRAVEL_2 has this extended feature, wanted to activate that before which thought of taking the experts view on the impact it can have on the existing system.
    As new fields get activated on TRIP, Travel Request and Travel expense report, will this have issue for the ones created before the activation.
    Regards...

    Wanted to know, if we activate "the FIN_TRAVEL_2" business function now, will that impact anything on the current Travel Requests or Expense sheet in any ways for processing. Also there is portal in place through which Travel requests are created too.
    The answer to that and to the activation of any business function in general is always YES. There's loads of coding in hundreds of subparts of the frame program that polls the Switchframework whether certain switches are switched on. I'm pretty sure there's nobody (including myself) who can line out every change in programmable process that takes place due to the activation.
    You say you are using a portal, I assume you are using the WebDynpro JAVA Services here? Or are you using transaction iviews with TA TRIP?
    What is stated in the help simply means that trips that are created in TA TRIP and WDA are not interchangeably processable. This does not mean that you cannot use the TA TRIP anymore once the business function is activated, but in case in your current business process you are furhter processing requests that are at the moment created in WebDynpro JAVA, that is not going to work likewise with WDA. (I hope this answers your question).
    Hence, just wanted to know if i activate this which cant be irreversable, will that have adverse impact on the existing TR or Travel expense reports or any other functionality.
    Careful. The activation of FIN_TRAVEL_2 IS irreversable, this means it is NOT reversable. The only unofficial way to deactivate such a business function is to roll back the Database.
    I have a question: What exactly are you using the Transaction TRIP for anyway? From EHP2 onwards it's practically obsolete, so you could shift your processes completely to the WDA services and TA PR05.
    Cheers, Lukas

  • Business Function for Business Context

    Dear All,
    I have a technical question regarding business function FIN_SSC_AIC_1.
    This Business Function is activated on the ERP side, my doubt is if this business function is not activated can we use business context on the service request to add a FI document from the ERP?
    Many Thanks and Best Regards,
    João Graça

    You should decide the flow in your action class only based on the configuration parameters of struts-config.xml

  • Active business function RE_GEN_CI_1

    Hi experts,
    I have installed SAP ERP 6.0 EHP4 Ready - Support Release 1, ABAP-based
    I want to active business function RE_GEN_CI_1. But I cannot find RE_GEN_CI_1 in T-code SFW5, what wrong?
    Please help me,
    Thanks so much

    Hi,
    business function RE_GEN_CI_1 is part of software component EA-APPL. Have you installed EA-APPL already and activated EA-FIN? Please refer to SAP note 628208 for further information about prerequisites for activation of RE-FX.
    Regards,
    Franz

Maybe you are looking for