Business transaction type parking permit is blocked for further business transactions

I have a testing for web request demo-parking permit. When I finished the web table and sent it. System show "business transaction type parking permit is blocked for further business transactions". Could you help check it?

Hi Hamendra:
Thanks for your hint. I have created the web request successful. Next , I have new issue. If I create a web request that be approved. How to send the web request message to inbox which is belong to approver by configuration? Thanks.

Similar Messages

Biz transaction type Incoming Call blocked for further biz transactions

Gurus:
When I go txn cic0 at CRM6.0, I get the message :
Business transaction type Incoming Call is blocked for further business transactions
Message no. CRM_ORDERADM_H501
I searched SDN and SSO but found no fix.
Could you tell me how to fix this?
Thanks!

Hi,
What must be hapening here is that you are accesing a IC profile, which has a default sales transaction assigned which is not active in customizing.
What is the source of this error, or better, is this happening with all users, is this result of any upgrade?
With these answers it will be easier for us to help you find the error. At first moment, it seems that the user you are logged in is not assigned to any position in PPOMA_CRM, or the position to which he is assigned doesn't have any IC profile, so the system logs in standard IC profile from SAP, and this IC Profile calls transaction type 0001 (Incoming Call) which probably you deactivated because you must have being using your own Z document types.
Regards,
Susana Messias

Transaction type 100 cannot be used for activity 'Acquisition from invoice'

Hi
My user got the error message : Transaction type 100 cannot be used for activity 'Acquisition from invoice receipt w/ affil. comp.'
when post the invoice via MIRO t code for 98% of the total amount.
The posting was is related to affiliated company, & by right it should pick transaction type 153 but it is pointing to 100.
If user post 100% , no error.
Please advice.

Check any of the following notes:-
=> Note 972556 - MIRO: Incorrect movement type with affiliated companies
=> Note 1060719 - Error AAPO 176 for postings from Logistics without vendor
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Set order block for new business partner

Hi experts,
I have the requirement to set the order block for a business partner (based on some attributes) at the moment when it will be created or changed.
I tried to use the BAdI BUPA_GENERAL_UPDATE where I am using the FM CRM_BUPA_FRG0050_READ/ CRM_BUPA_FRG0050_GET_DETAIL to retrieve the already existing status data and the FM CRM_BUPA_FRG0050_CREATE/ CRM_BUPA_FRG0050_CHANGE to add or change this data.
In the SAPGUI at least the update scenario (CRM_BUPA_FRG0050_CHANGE) is working.
In the WebUI application none of the both is working: In the create scenario the application is even dumping (SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC) but this dump happens in an other implementation of this BAdI!
In the BP update scenario nothing happens though the UI will be refreshed by some coding like
lr_bol_core = cl_crm_bol_core=>get_instance( ).
lr_bol_core->modify( ).
Is there something wrong or missing or is there a better BAdI to achieve this requirement?
Thanks for any help!
Regards,
Wolfhard
PS: I found another post which covers exactly my requirements but unfortunately without a solution...
[Re: Update of BP General Data during creation of BP]

Hi Bruce,
I propose to select the right value programmatically and then hide the original combo box (use the FromPane / ToPane properties - better don't disable it or make it invisble) and display a disabled EditText item which displays the pricelist which should be applied to new customers when the Form is switched to - or launched in "Add" mode.
When the form is switched to other modes than "Add" reactivate the original ComboBox...
HTH,
Frank

Transaction Type field not getting value in F-05 transaction

Hi All,
When ever we are doing a reverse posting for foreign currency valuation using F.05 Tcode it will create a BDC session where we can execute this batch Input session thru SM37.
This will use F-05 Tcode to post the the entries, but the problem is one of the field Transaction Type is not getting value for some of the GL account numbers range. This is totally SAP standard program take cares of it. Transaction type field value shuld be populated by '990' value for this GL account range, this is fixed. So is thr any User exit or Screen exit for this Tcode or how we can populate the value....
Help me...
Chandar
Edited by: Bala Chandar on Feb 12, 2009 1:25 PM
Edited by: Bala Chandar on Feb 12, 2009 1:28 PM
Edited by: Bala Chandar on Feb 12, 2009 1:33 PM

Hi Mr/Mrs Bala Chander,
I am having the same problem.
When running F.05 a BIM is created for GL account X. GL account X has a field status in which transaction type is defined as a required field because of BCS / ECCS. We have a substitution rule in place which should default the transaction type, based on several criteria. But when executing the BIM, I see that nothing is filled in field transaction type. Did you find a proper solution for your problem? Changing the field status is not an option in my opinion.
Regards,
Joep

The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions....When inserting during trigger in linked server

Hi All,
I am getting below error while inserting into Linked Server (sql2012) thru trigger from sql2008 ....However if i insert the same thru Store Procedure it is inserting successfully....MSDTC service is started on both sql server machines....also both machines
rebooted....but still i am facing this error.
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX.XXX.XXX.XX" returned message "The partner transaction manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions.".
Msg 7391, Level 16, State 2, Procedure ins_test, Line 11
The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "XXX.XXX.XXX.XX" was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
Could assist to resolve.
Regards
Shehzad

Hi SHzKhan,
According to your error message, we need to verify if you configure the MSDTC correctly, When you have more than one SQL Server involved in a Distributed Transaction, you need to make some changes to the default configuration of MSDTC for these distributed
transactions to succeed. There is a detail about recommending MSDTC settings for using Distributed Transactions in SQL Server, you can review the following article.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2027550/en-us
There is a similar issue about error 7391, you can refer to the following link.
http://dba.stackexchange.com/questions/30235/msg-7391-distributed-transactions-dtc-on-sql-server
Regards,
Sofiya Li
Sofiya Li
TechNet Community Support

Blocked for further processing.

hi every body
plz can anyone tell me
How to classify an item as 'Fast' or 'Slow' moving? There is a requirement to ensure that any PO with a slow moving item is automatically blocked for further processing.
thank u
mahesh

hi,
\i dont think u have any such option in standard SAP.
how ever u can block the material for further purchasing, once u have the list of slow moving items, considering the last consumption pattern.
once u block the same u will get the message while creating the PR / PO

Specific incoming mail types block for further incoming mails??

Since upgrading my 3GS to iOS4, I have experienced a new strange phenomenon within mail-reception:
Now and then I am receiving a mail, which places itself at the bottom of the incoming mail list. Such mails are always WITHOUT any sender/WITHOUT any contents, and ALL of them dated 1.1.1970! I can't wipe them out, neither can I delete them/move them. The effect is further that upon reception of such mail types, any further reception of mails is BLOCKED - I only hear the sound when new mails are coming in, don't SEE them in the top of the list. The only immediate way of eliminating the problem is to make a COLD reboot of the phone - then the odd mail(s) at the bottom of the incoming mail list disappear(s), and new mails are coming freely in without obstructions. A new restore of the system appears to be without effect.
I would be grateful for any hints which might eliminate the problem, thanks!

CUCM takes decisions on called number, not calling. one all time favorite question a quick search on NetPro would have provided you the answer
Call Blocking Configuration Examples
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/customer/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_configuration_example09186a00803f818a.shtml#con11
Reject Calls
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a0080325e8e.shtml#reject
In case you ask, only h323 can do this.
MGCP can NOT do this
in case you want to block an outgoing call from the fax to a particular number create a route pattern with the exact number and block the call.
HTH
javalenc
if this helps, please rate

Business Content for Bill Up transaction in CRM system

To all Experts,
I'm currently working on a project that requires Bill Up transactional data ( Source Table: CMSD_BU ) to flow from CRM to BW system. I'm looking for Business Content that can fulfill this requirement. However, till to date, I couldn't find any information of such Business Content. I'm not sure if such BC exist. Can anyone help if you have experience implement this data flow?
When searching for the DataSource / Extractor, I found BW Extract Structure CMST_BU_BW and CMST_BU_BW_C in the CRM system. But couldn't find any DataSource for both extract structure. Not sure if we need to install any support pack in order make the BC available in the system. Please help if you have any idea.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Hui Pin

Hi Shalini,
The document is replicated from ECC to CRM without any errors.
For this document I just want to create follow up transaction in CRM.(I dont want to change the document in CRM)
The follow up transaction is in display mode. this is my problem.
Hi Rekha:
I have done following setting in CRM to create follow up transaction in CRM for the document which is replicated from ECC to CRM.
1)     Defined the Copying Control for Transaction type
2)     Defined Copying Control for Item categories
3)     Defined Item category determination when copying
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
-Rahul.

Purchase order Block for UB document type

Hi
I have closed the site (e.g. R200) through transaction code WB02; closed the site date and also bloke the vendor u2013 R200.
When I am trying to create purchase order with document type UB, as supplying site u2013 R200, it is allowing me to create Purchaser orderu2026
While, vendor u2013R200 is blocking during creation of purchaser order with document type NB, as it should be, because we have block the vendor.
My requirement is that, I would like to block PO during document type UB as well.
Please help me, if there are some master data needs to be block.
Please note that, we have been asked not to remove config from u2018default document type for stock transfer orderu2019,
Regards
Vanraj

Thanks Padmsri,
as you suggested, supplying site R200 is already assigned to R200 vendor and we have blocked the vendor as well.
and company code is also same for both,
but still, we are able to create PO for UB type, however it is blocking for NB type.
could you please help more on that or guide us to where we can explore... is it some config or master data?
Regards
Vanraj

Transaction type for interaction record

Hi All,
I created Z transaction for interaction record(transaction type 0010).But on UI instead of Z transaction,standard transaction is coming.Channel for Z transaction is maintained.
All settings given in best practice have been maintained.
Please let me know what can be the issue?
Thanks in Advance..

Hi,
have you assigned your business transaction profile to your business role?
transaction CRMC_UI_PROFILE.
Select your IC-businessrole --> Assign function profile:
Function profile ID = IC_BT
Maintain here your Z-Profile.
Kind regards
Manfred

Change transaction type group for transaction type

Hi
Is it possible to change the transaction type group for a TTY.For ex i want to change for 270 and 151 -TTY GRP -32 and 33 respectively.As of now it is TTY grp is 25 and 10.I need to change this so that in Asset history sheet when i do ABT1N i want these values to be in field transfer and not in acquisition and retirement in respective company codes.
Where is TTY grp are set for TTY.Can it be modified.Please suggest.

For creating transaction type see the wiki.
In the transaction types you assign them!
For 151
SPRO:
Financial Accounting / Asset Accounting / Transactions / Acquisitions / Define Transaction Types for Acquisitions.
Assign there the asst hist group you need for this transaction type
For 270
SPRO:
Financial Accounting / Asset Accounting / Transactions / Retirements / Define Transaction Types for Retirements
Assign there the asst hist group you need for this transaction type

Transaction type to be used for revaluation

Hi Sir,
Question is how to revaluate the asset.
1. In oabw, oayr and in ao90 I checked and the posting of gross revaluation in abaw Tty 800 is posted.
2. It is shown in aw01n.
Till here It is fine, after that What I need to do.
Pl Suggest different scenarios.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
You have been using manual revaluation, please go through following documnetation which will help you to understand. (If you have defined separate depreciation area for revaluation then such area post APC values periodically) or you are using existing depreciation area which post APC values periodically then you need to run periodic posting to post values in FI. IF APC values are being posted realtime for the area which is being revaluated e.g. area 01 then you have already done all activity and not required to do anything else.
Manual Planning
If you choose to plan revaluation manually, the revaluation report can still be used to create the depreciation areas required for the individual assets. If you choose, the report does not create a posting session in that case. For planning, use transaction type Rxx (xx = key of the revaluation). The system automatically creates this transaction type when you define the revaluation.
If you want to post gross revaluation, that is, with the revaluation of historical depreciation (backlog calculation), use transaction type 800. Transaction type 800 is defined in the standard system so that it posts to all depreciation areas that allow for revaluation and backlog calculation in their Customizing definitions. If you want to limit the posting of gross revaluation only to specific depreciation areas, you have to change the Customizing definition of transaction type 800 accordingly (function Areas). Or copy transaction type 800 and change the copy.
In this instance also, FI documents are not created until the periodic posting of the depreciation area to Financial Accounting is carried out.
Thanks!!!
Murlidhar Khatri

Block transaction types from being searchable

hi Experts
Currently we use only certain transaction types. I tried to use the 'inactive' status which disallows creation of new transactions under those types but I need to prevent search for these transaction types as well.
My question is, is there a configurable solution?
If so, please let me know how to do this.
steps:
spro
CRM
Transactions
Basic Settings
Definition of Trans. types
type LDCP for example is one I need to hide from searchability.
Thanks!
Chris

Hello Chris,
if you do not want to change this transaction types you wont see in WebUI in your customizing there is also another way.
Do not allow this transaction types in your authorization (PFCG-Role).
Transaction types you are not authorized for you won´t see in search result lists.
Hope this helps.
Best regards
Manfred

Implementation of Note 660016 for Follow up Transactions in CRM 2007

Hi All,
   We have a requirement to not show all the business activities and tasks available in crm for all the transactions as follow-ups.
   For this reason we implemented the note - 660016. Now its working fine.. It is not showing business acitivities and tasks as follow-up transactions in the CRM GUI and Web UI 2007 for all the transactions.
   But when I create a business activity as a followup for ztransaction in define copying control for business transactions.. It is showing in the CRM GUI but not in the WebUI.
But at the same time when I create a service complaint as a followup for my ztransaction, I am seeing the service complaint as a follow up in both CRM GUI and Web UI.
   Is the implementation of this note restricting business activities and taks in WebUI forever or do I need to write any extra logic or is this any configuration issue ?
Regards,
Raghu
Edited by: Raghu Danda on Mar 8, 2009 1:17 PM
Edited by: Raghu Danda on Mar 9, 2009 5:14 AM

Hi Robert,
   Thanks for your reply
   I checked the link, But I didnt get the full information there.
   Firstly, my problem is not with upgrade and
   the second thing is before implementing the note 660016, I am able to see both in CRM GUI and Web
   UI all the business acitivities and tasks along with other transaction types as follow-up transactions.
   After implementing the note, I am not able to see only the business activities and tasks in the Web UI
   as follow-ups and in CRM GUI, its appearing as follow-ups.
   Hope you got my question now...
   If this is not done in customization I need to code according to my scenario..
   When I kept a break point this class is triggering from another class.
   Do I need to code in the class CL_CRM_UIU_BT_ACT_CUST_GET, according to my scenario.
   Again I have a question here, will you please tell me in which component this class exists, so that I
   will enhance that component.
   Because when I debug after clicking on the Follow-Up button,this class is calling some where
   down...So I am unbale to get the right component for this.
Regards,
Raghu
I

Business transaction type parking permit is blocked for further business transactions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for