Business vendor volume not updating

Hi,
We have the following problem: when creating subsequent settlement with MEB4 the field S015-BONBA (business vendor volume) is less than expected, this can be seen comparing to the movements in MB51, but we cant find the origin of the problem because the system dont show any error messages. We believe it can be a problem related to support packages implemented months ago.
Any ideas? . Thanks in advance

Hi
See SAP Note 429980 - LIS: Incorrect data in an info structure
Regards
Eduardo

Similar Messages

Vendor field not updated in CRM pricing condition table

Hi,
We have maintained condition table with Material and Vendor fields in ECC and table is active
After replicating this table from ECC to CRM, vendor field not updated in table and it is inactive.
There is any mapping settings required to update vendor field in CRM table from ECC.
Please help me out to solve this issue
Regards
kishore kumar

hi, the data field of vendor is a standard one or custimizing one?
I remeber there is a data mapping setting in CRM, for condition field. If you want to mapping a ERP standard field to a CRM custmizing one, you need to setting your rule in it. Maybe you can find it in SM30 view.
I can't login a CRM system now, so sorry for not offer your the view name.

Vendor is not updating in batch while doing STO

Hi All,
I created a PO with vendor 123456.Did a GR for it.
In GR i maintained a batch AA1 and received the material. Now the stock is in A plant with batch AA1 and vendor 123456.
Then i went in to batch AA1 and found that vendor(123456) was updated in batch master.
Next i created a STO for moving the stock from one plant to another. Stock transfer A plant to B plant.
In STO also i used the same batch AA1 and in outbounddelivery i used same batch AA1 and in GR i maintained the same batch AA1 but plant B.
Now i checked the batch AA1 for plant B.
Here the vendor is not updated in the batch AA1 for plant B combination.
What may be the reason.
If STO is done system cant able to pick the vendor?
KIndly help me in this regard.
Regards
KK

HI,
Thanks for the reply.
Yes you are exactly correct.
Is there anyother way that vendor can be updated in the batch?
Regards
KK
Edited by: Kishore Kumar Galla on Nov 10, 2009 2:17 AM

Business area is not updating when allocating stock to sales order

Dear Experts,
When ever we allocating/dislocating stock in MB1B with 412E and 411E movement type,business area is not updating in the
accounting documents.but we assigned business area to plant in the customization.its happening to our Depot,for remaing plants its working.
Regards,
Varun

please suggest me right forum to post the issue.
Regards,
Varun

Retention amount paid to vendor is not updated in PO history tab

Dear All,
I had activated business function 'LOG_MMFI_P2P'. As a result i am getting Payment processing tab in PO.
There i can define Down payment and Retention percentages. I had created a service purchase order and then service entry sheet.
After the acceptance of service entry sheet i did invoicing (MIRO). Here i get an option to clear down payment (an additional button becomes available to clear down payment). That scenario is working perfectly fine. System also proposes the retention amount. I can change retention amount/percentage or continue with same.After invoice is posted the retention amount is visible under PO history tab against Invoice number.
Now my problem is when i am doing payment of retention amount(after doing payment of services deducting down payment and retention) to vendor the 'Posted Retention in Document Currency' column in PO history tab is not updated.
Regards,
Kamal

Dear Pankaj,
Thanks for quick Reply.
I think you did not understand my question. In PO history tab for down payment scenario (defined through PO and cleared in MIRO) proper lines are getting created. For retention new line will not be created. But the invoice row in PO history tab is having two columns -
1) Retention in Document Currency.
2) Posted Retention in Document Currency.
The first column is having value which is the retention amount. But second column is not having any value even after the payment (portion held as retention)is made.
I will add one more thing. If i run FK10N for the vendor- then Special G/L account for retention is updated properly.
Regards,
Kamal
Edited by: kamal.anandani1 on Apr 22, 2011 8:02 AM

Vendor information not updated in the PO

Hello,
I have a case where a PReq was created with a blocked vendor GE Canada then when the buyer converted the Preq into the PO before saving the PO they she changed the vendor to GE Canada (Not blocked) but when she save the PO it still kept the old vendor's address which is in Toronto instead of updating the address with the unblocked one which is in Calgary.
What causes this?
Thanks
Ibou

Hi Ibou,
If it's only for that one PO, why not update the Vendor address in the purchase order itself? I assume that all other purchase requisitions created after the change copies the udpated address already.
I also tested the scenario in our system and it behaves similarly to your sandbox system.
Cheers.

R/3 Vendor changes not updated in to SRM

Hi,
1) Vendor changed on 01/05/2009 in R/3 (Blocked) but not updated in to SRM,
2) User created shopping cart for this vendor on 20/08/2009 and approved PO gone in to Error
Error:21.08.2009 16:55:28 PO 4710113629: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
3) 26/08/2009 R/3 vendor is changed in R/3 i.e street changed
4) SRM vendor updated with all changes i.e vendor block also which changed in R/3 on 01/05/2009
I am struggling to find why it is not updated on 01/05/2009 and updated on 26/08/2009, there is no workflow also
and
what to do for error PO we dont want to use this vendor
Thx
Jai

Hi,
Please check the SLG1 log for object BBPUPDVD and BBP_VENDOR_SYNC.
You see what is updated in the past.
Regards,
Masa

Business Hub rate not updating.

Hi guys, me again!
It's been a little while so I thought I'd post a problem I've been having with my Business Hub. Effectively when I first got the business hub, the Rate would always match the Max Rate, I.e. when the line capacity changes (which can do because of the length of the line) the rate would change with it. I was happy with this as my Max rate rarely dropped below 1150kbps and so I stayed in that profile. Often it would go up to above to 1300 and the rate would follow even if it didn't mean a change in IP profile.
However, now things have changed. It seems as though the rate doesn't follow the Max Rate and it's actually causing problems. For instance, for the last 2 weeks my rate was stuck at 944kbps (which gives me a profile of 750kbps) while my rate was 1250 with 6.4db noise (which gives me a profile of 1000kbps). I checked the diagnostics and Max Rate dropped below 1150kbps only once for a very short time and it was soon up again to 1200+. What's annoying is that for the last 2 weeks I could have been on a higher IP profile but it simply wasn't updating. Then yesterday the rate went up to 1360 (still in the 1000kbps profile range), yippee I thought, but to no avail as it was down to 1050 (back down to 750 profile) again this morning, despite having a max rate of 1200. It seems as though it rarely updates the Rate if Max Rate is higher, but instantly updates it if it has a lower value.
I don't know why it's begun doing this but as you can see it shouldn't be doing this as its stopping my IP profile from rising despite my Max Rate increasing.
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Regards,
Mike.

unless you are on a non adsl-max/adsl2 line then what you seem to think happens does not sound at all correct, certainly it is not how either of my lines work (both business hubs),
What happens is that you get a sync, fine, at that stage it determines the amount of data that can be send and that becomes your rate, over the length of the connection the max rate value can vary due I believe to bitloading and fluctuation normal interference on the line but this does not alter the sync rate on any of my lines EVER.
You seem to be losing sync then due to some reason and this causes you to swtch to another rate, either you have a line issue, an internal wiring issue or your target margin is set to low for the line you have (which would mean you get a really good sync during the day but at night it would tend to drop).
Now when you get a new sync and it is in the different IP profile band to the last ones(s) then two things can happen
1 - your sync means you drop a band and in which case this happens within 75 minutes, normally much quicker
2 - Your sync means you should go up a band and this should happen eventuallly.
When going up a band (unless you are on the CN21 88.2% method (which you are not by what you say) then there are two methods that would apply to you depending on your exchange.
Method 1 - 3 days. After 3 days of having a sync rate ALWAYS within the new higher band the profile should change, it does not matter despite what others saty if you have resyncs in between but every single one of them must be in the same band or greater.
Method 2 - Adaptive max. Same rules as above re syncs but the timeframe is much reduced, At the speeds you are talking about it basically works out at 24 hours if jumping 1 band and 12 hours if jumping more than 1 (allow 2 hours extra that these since the update seeems to be a scheduled task).
IN either of the above your profile can stick so if it has not updated within 3 days then you need to contact the mods on this site, posting the results of a bt speedtester and your hub stats and ask for the profile to be checked. They will be able to see the correct value on their systems and the wrong value on the speedtest and so know it is stuck or not.
Stuck profiles in my experience do occasionally get unstuck without any help but so far when this has happened it has been at 3-3.5 days only and if after that time then it never happens.
If my post was helpful then please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side If the the reply answers your question fully then please select ’Mark as Accepted Solution’

Business Area Field not Update in VF02 for output tex

Hello All,
in vf02 transaction the business area is not populating in case of output tex,i already search the relavent document in sdn but its not working,i impliment the exit userexit EXIT_SAPLV60B_006 (member of enhancement SDVFX006). as referance of http://scn.sap.com/thread/3146034,but my exit is not at all triger i check all the things like the project is already activated and i also thing that we need to fiel the bseg-table for tha i wrote the code also, as refer to
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3164333,please suggest to resolve this issue. in note SAP Note 199886 it say its a stnd.behv .
THANKS,
Sam

Hi,
iam not sure how it can be checked but in FS00 you can compare both GL Accounts at - control in chart of accounts whether it is p& l account or Balance sheet account
also check the field status group
if you can compare both GL accounts you will get the answer
If you are doing sales order check whether the Business area is appaering in the order
iam sorry business area does not come from material master,profit centre comes from material master

Vendor address not updated in Scheduling Agreement

I have a peculiar problem where the vendor address is not being updated in all scheduling agreements. I have multiple SAs against a vendor. When i change the name of the vendor, the name changes only in one of the SA. All the remaining SA carry the old name of the vendor. I tested with another vendor on the test system and the names on all the agreements change as soon as I make the change in the vendor master.
Does anyone have any explanation on why the system is behaving strangely?
Thanks

Hi,
I am more surprised that the name changed automatically on the ones that DID change.
I would not have expected this to update in this way. The main idea is that outline agrements can have different data to the master records because they are specific agreements and often relate to very specific data.
If you wanted to change the address of a vendor it should NOT change the address of existinmg VSAs etc. automatically because the document is a =fixed contract that is agreed between you and the vendor and should ONLY be changed manually.
We had a similar question earlier today asking why the system does not change the short description on a contract when the short description on the material master changes. My reply was basically the same, it SHOULDN'T change it automatically because the agreement is a legal document and cannot be changed by just ONE of the parties involved.
So I would be asking why the one VSA changed automatically (and the ones in the test syste) not why the others didn't change.
Just trying to lok at this from all angles.
Steve B

Banking Vendor Info not updated from HR Banking infotype

Hi Gurus,
I have an issue and I can't quite for sure know how to solve it.
My HR team are able to change the banking info of the vendors/employees( employees are also treated as vendors) ....
When we run a report or job for employee's direct deposit , the vendor master data keeps on giving us the old banking info.
My belief is that the changes made by HR for employees new Banking account is not beeng automatically updated in Vendor Master Data.
Can someone help me on this.
Thanks
Shilpa

In another term I would say that it is like synchronizing HR Banking info with Vendor Master data records
Thnaks

Skype for Business not updating icons on start menu - Using OCT for Lync 2013 deployment

We're currently deploying Lync 2013 to out fleet using the OCT to customize where the shortcuts are created.
What we are finding is that the Skype for Business Patch does not update these icons. It only updates the icons if they are in the default location (no OCT).
Is there a standalone Installer for Skype for Business we could apply a TRANSFORM to? Or some other method of updating all icons startmenu, taskbar etc.
Thanks

Hi Alan Dooley,
Have you tried to create a new desktop shortcut ?
In addition, you can try to follow the FAQ below to rebuild the icon cache.
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windows/en-US/bea47202-d869-4155-8c8f-2a5b8bd7be1d/forum-faqhow-to-rebuild-icon-cache
Best regards,
Eric
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

Data not updating in table ,data transfered using DTW

Hi Everybody,
I had transfered data using DTW, it shows that data imported,but it not updated, that means it not shows in database.
So please so me any solution to this.
Regards,
Srinivas

Hi suda,
I am giving he detailes of the BusinessObject
BusinessObject =oUserLanguages
template=oUserLanguages.csv
i had copied the oUserLanguage.csv file and entered data into it and saved it(comma deliminated)
steps:
1.i had selected oUserlanguage object from list.
2.i had selected source file (oUserLanguage.csv )
3.the data properly matched and data is displayed when source tab is pressed. and ields are properly matched.
4.three check boxes are checked.
5.i had seen the message you are sucessfully specified required information for imporing data
6.in lost step it shows like below
Total: 2 business object(s)
2 business object(s) imported successfully
0 business object(s) not imported
0 business object(s) updated successfully
0 business object(s) not updated
7.in log files status shows succeeded
But I had cheked the languages , the data imported not shown.
Regards
srinivas

LFA1-MCOD1 not updating

Hi ,
When creating a vendor, the name1 and city has to be copied to LFA1-MCOD1 , LFA1-MCOD3 respectively. For some vendors its not updating in the table LFA1. Please provide some information on this problem.
Regards,
Rosy.

Hello,
For anyoone who may be interested, SAP has released a Z report to correct discrepancies between MCOD1 and NAME1 fields.
Please check the note 544868.
The updation of field MCOD* has been brought by note 1009172 and you can even check the form MATCHCODEFEFLDER_FUELLEN into MF02KFM0 used by program SAPFM02K.
Regards,
Kev

Data not Updated in Custom Screen fields-Vendor Master

Hello,
I have created a custom screen in vendor master transaction and also implemented the two BADI's below.
Business Add-In: Processing Master Data Enhancements
(CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA/VENDOR_ADD_DATA)
Passed the Custom Program and Screen No in the method GET_TAXI_SCREEN
Business Add-In: Customer Subscreens
(CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA_CS/VENDOR_ADD_DATA_CS)
activate it with the BADI Processing Master Data Enhancements with method CHECK_ADD_ON_ACTIVE.
I also created a new screen and used few fields from LFA1 (Append structure fields) such that the fields on the screen are : LFA1-ZZFIELD1 etc...
Now the issue is the screen is displayed, but the data entered on the screen is not updated on the table LFA1 or data from the table is not displayed on the custom screen.
Am i missing something?
Regards,
Shiva

Solved this problem.
I built the query against InfoCube and not the characteristic itself. That's why I can't see the update.
Thanks.

Business vendor volume not updating

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for