BW server raises exception SYSTEM_ERROR
Hi,
When trying to run a query in BEx, the BW Server is throwing an exception name SYSTEM_ERROR. These are the details
<internal error> Recieving from the BW System failed. BW Server raised exception SYSTEM_ERROR
Error Group: RFC_ERROR_SYSTEM_FAILURE
Message: Time Limit exceeded
I first referred to this thread Query Execution Error
and this one
Re: Error in Reprots: BW server raised exception:SYSTEM_FAILURE
but I still have some doubts. First,
this error is coming only for one specific report. Other reports are executing perfectly fine. If it was a problem with the SAPGUI or with the RFC connection itself, all reports on the BW system should have thrown the same error.
Plus, the Message in my case is "Time Limit Exceeded", not Field Symbol not assigned, or RFC Destination on-existent.
Is there any other note or do the above links also apply in this case?
Restrict your query with some values and then try running the query. Generally, if the data volume is very high, the system shows this kind of error.
You can also use a variable in your query and while running the query, select a smaller part og the data.
Hope it will help you.
Thanks.,.
Shambhu
Similar Messages
-
Oracle BI Scheduler raised exception while exporting report by iBot and cus
Hi,
I have the issue. When I export BI report using iBot and Java program(BI Publisher Java API) - Oracle BI Scheduler raised exception.
Platform:
OBIEE 10.1.3.4 on aix 5.3.0.0
See the captured log below and any suggestion to fix this will be greatly appreciated.
- javahost.out.log
Sep 23, 2009 2:46:35 AM SchedulerComponentLoad load
INFO: Loading config ...
Sep 23, 2009 2:46:35 AM SchedulerComponentLoader load
WARNING: Scheduler RPC components is disabled due to incorrect configuration.
Sep 23, 2009 2:46:35 AM ApplicationImpl init
INFO: Running configuration:
JVM=IBM J9 VM(2.3)
Listener.Port=9810
Listener.PermittedClientList=*
Listener.Address=null
JobManager.MinThreads=100
JobManager.MaxThreads=100
JobManager.MaxPendingJobs=100
JobManager.IdleThreadTimeoutMls=300000
MessageProcessor.SocketTimeoutMls=5000
Charts.InputStreamLimitInKB=1024
Charts.RequestResponseLogDirectory=/oracle/oraclebidata/tmp
Chart.Enabled=true
Chart.InputStreamLimitInKB=1024
Chart.ChartRoot=/oracle/oraclebi/corda50/chart_root
Chart.CordaRoot=/oracle/oraclebi/corda50
Chart.EnableConsoleOutput=false
Chart.EnableXmlValidation=true
Chart.MaxAttributeLength=127
Batik.InputStreamLimitInKB=1024
Batik.RequestResponseLogDirectory=/oracle/oraclebidata/tmp
Batik.EnableXmlValidation=false
Scheduler.Java.Enabled=false
Scheduler.Java.DefaultUserJarFilePath=null
Scheduler.Java.PurgePeriod=0
Scheduler.Java.TempPath=null
XMLP.InputStreamLimitInKB=8192
XMLP.RequestResponseLogDirectory=/oracle/oraclebidata/tmp
OBISAuthenticatorProxy.InputStreamLimitInKB=128
OBISAuthenticatorProxy.RequestResponseLogDirectory=/oracle/oraclebidata/tmp
OBISAuthenticatorProxy.ClassName=oracle.bi.server.customauthenticatorimpl.javahostrpccall.DisabledAuthenticator
Sep 23, 2009 2:46:35 AM Main main
INFO: Listening for new connections
Sep 23, 2009 3:01:56 AM RpcSchedulerJob processMessage
WARNING: Error
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.io.File.<init>(File.java:220)
at com.siebel.analytics.scheduler.javahostrpccalls.SchedulerJavaUtil.getMaxCount(SchedulerJavaUtil.java:118)
at com.siebel.analytics.scheduler.javahostrpccalls.SchedulerJavaUtil.makeUniqueFileName(SchedulerJavaUtil.java:109)
at com.siebel.analytics.scheduler.javahostrpccalls.SchedulerJavaUtil.readJobInfo(SchedulerJavaUtil.java:68)
at com.siebel.analytics.scheduler.javahostrpccalls.RpcDisabledSchedulerJob.processMessageInternal(RpcDisabledSchedulerJob.java:36)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.AbstractRpcCall.processMessage(AbstractRpcCall.java:107)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.MessageProcessorImpl.processMessage(MessageProcessorImpl.java:175)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.Listener$Job.run(Listener.java:223)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.standalone.SAJobManagerImpl.threadMain(SAJobManagerImpl.java:205)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.standalone.SAJobManagerImpl$1.run(SAJobManagerImpl.java:153)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:810)
- nqscheduler.out.log
[Util Logger] Exception occured:
Severity:Not set
Type:const saw::Exception *
+ File:/net/sdcb80a022/vol1/users/anabuild/views/nightly/Tue/101341/AIX/vobs/090414.1900/analytics_web/main/project/webcomm/rpc.cpp+
Line:371
Message:A fatal error occurred while processing the request. The server responded with: Error while executing RpcSchedulerJob.processMessage
java.lang.NullPointerException
at java.io.File.<init>(File.java:220)
at com.siebel.analytics.scheduler.javahostrpccalls.SchedulerJavaUtil.getMaxCount(SchedulerJavaUtil.java:118)
at com.siebel.analytics.scheduler.javahostrpccalls.SchedulerJavaUtil.makeUniqueFileName(SchedulerJavaUtil.java:109)
at com.siebel.analytics.scheduler.javahostrpccalls.SchedulerJavaUtil.readJobInfo(SchedulerJavaUtil.java:68)
at com.siebel.analytics.scheduler.javahostrpccalls.RpcDisabledSchedulerJob.processMessageInternal(RpcDisabledSchedulerJob.java:36)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.AbstractRpcCall.processMessage(AbstractRpcCall.java:107)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.MessageProcessorImpl.processMessage(MessageProcessorImpl.java:175)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.Listener$Job.run(Listener.java:223)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.standalone.SAJobManagerImpl.threadMain(SAJobManagerImpl.java:205)
at com.siebel.analytics.javahost.standalone.SAJobManagerImpl$1.run(SAJobManagerImpl.java:153)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:810)
Edited by: user8096018 on Sep 23, 2009 5:40 AMI am also having the same issue......Can some body help me please? Thanks
-
SharePoint 2010 Search Error: "Internal server error exception"
Hi,
We have a SharePoint 2010 Farm with 5 servers:
1 SQL Server Cluster
2 WFE
1 Index Server
1 Search Server
Please see bellow a more detailed specification.Our DNS is using a Load Balancer
It turns out that when it uses one WFE (SERVWFE05) it throws this error:
SharePoint 2010 Search Error: "Internal server error exception"
when it uses the other one (SERVWFE06) it works.
What can be wrong?
SERVERS IN FARM
Server
SharePoint Products Installed
Services Running
Status
SERVAPI07
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Portuguese/Português
Central Administration
Upgrade Available Remove Server
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Russian/русский
Claims to Windows Token Service
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Spanish/Español
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Incoming E-Mail
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Portuguese/Português
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Russian/русский
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Workflow Timer Service
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Spanish/Español
Secure Store Service
Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010
SharePoint Server Search
Web Analytics Data Processing Service
Web Analytics Web Service
SERVAPI08
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Portuguese/Português
Central Administration
Upgrade Available
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Russian/русский
Claims to Windows Token Service
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Spanish/Español
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Incoming E-Mail
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Portuguese/Português
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Russian/русский
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Workflow Timer Service
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Spanish/Español
Search Query and Site Settings Service
Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010
SharePoint Server Search
SERVSQL13
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Database
No Action Required
SERVWFE05
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Portuguese/Português
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Incoming E-Mail
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Russian/русский
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Spanish/Español
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Workflow Timer Service
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Portuguese/Português
Upgrade Available Remove Server
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Russian/русский
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Spanish/Español
Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010
SERVWFE06
EMBWFEPRD06 Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Portuguese/Português
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Incoming E-Mail
Upgrade Available
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Russian/русский
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application
Language Pack for SharePoint Foundation 2010 - Spanish/Español
Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Workflow Timer Service
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Portuguese/Português
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Russian/русский
Language Pack for SharePoint, Project Server and Office Web Apps 2010 - Spanish/Español
Microsoft SharePoint Server 2010
MODIFY TOPOLOGY
Server Name
Category
SERVAPI07
Admin
Administration Component
SERVAPI07
Crawl
Crawl Component 1
SERVSQL13
Databases
Administration Database : Search_Service_Application_DB1
SERVSQL13
Crawl Database : Search_Service_Application_CrawlStore_DB2
SERVSQL13
Property Database : Search_Service_Application_PropertyStore_DB3
SERVAPI08
Index Partition - 0
Query Component 1
Many thanks
J.CLUAHI,
1.
Ensure that the IIS Admin service is running
2.
Ensure that the ApppPool related to the service is running
3.
Ensure that the DB server that application is located is running and have enough space.
4.
Ensure that the Apppool is set with the correct credentials and password.
Do you see any correllation ID while search or any error.If its a correlation ID,please check the below site to get the exact error from where its generating.
http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/2014/07/how-to-find-correlation-id-error.html
- See more at: http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/search?q=internal#sthash.rS79y0Nd.dpuf
Anil Avula[Partner,MCP,MCSE,MCSA,MCTS,MCITP,MCSM] See Me At: http://expertsharepoint.blogspot.de/ -
Re: Raising Exceptions Vs returning erro[Ref:C809787]
Hi Steve !
Probably the following explanation might help in resolving the issue raised by
you:
At a more abstract level, there is only one thing, i.e. the EVENT. According to
it's definition, an event is a relatively infrequent occurrence in one portion (lets
call it event raiser) of the application, which some other portion (or portions,
lets call them event handlers) (of the same application) are interested to respond
to it. Now there are two scenarios:
(A) Event raiser and Event handler(s) are being executed under different threads
of control (Asynchronous) and
(B) Event raiser and Event Handler(s) are being executed under same thread of
control (Synchronous).
So, Exception Handling belongs to scenario B where the method raising the
exception (Event Raiser or exception raiser) and the method handling it (Event
Handler or exception block) are under the same thread of control. More ever it has
to be insured that at a time only one handler (first the inner most one) receives
the message.
Forté provides a generic Event handling mechanism (Post Event and Event Loop) to
handle the scenario A (which is the more generic one). But it also provides a
specialized Event Handling mechanism (Raise Exception and Exception block) to
efficiently handle the relatively simple scenario B. Why I am saying that the later
is efficient because it won't be needing to register the event queue address of the
interested task (after all there is only one task involved) and put the event
message in queue.
Finally let me mentioned that it is just my view based on the understanding I
have and it may not be true. Only a person from forté can confirm it. I will really
appreciate if somebody correct and or refine it.
Wish a Very Very Happy New Year to all Forté Users
Regard,
Kailash.
[email protected] wrote:
I would agree with Eric entirely. Exceptions seem to me to be a much more
complete solution to the problem of error handling. A little bit of effort up
front in making clear the strategy for exception handling and specifying the
exceptions that can be raised by a class\method will provide an excellent method
for error handling.
In the case of ensuring exceptions are always handled, a top level handler for
GenericException will usually do the job, allowing you to write error
information out to logs, screen, etc, and then shut down gracefully.
The only issue I would raise with exceptions is that they are not propagated
outside an asynchronous task. If an exception is not handled within an
asynchronous, it will not propagate to the task that started that asynchronous
task. Forte provides return and exception events when starting asynchronous
tasks to cope with this, but it seems a shame to have one method of dealing with
errors (exceptions) for synchronous behaviour, and another (events) for
asynchronous behaviour.
Steve Elvin
Systems Developer
Frontline Ltd.
UK
Mark,
The problem with return codes is that there is an underlying assumption
that the receiver will always catch and interpret that error code. This
may or may not be good thing, depending on how you architect your
application. If, on the other hand, you want to ensure that an error is
always handled, if not by the receiver then by the Forte, Exceptions are
the way to go. To extend this mechanism further, I would subclass
GenericException and created my own error code attribute on that
subclass. That way the receiver has the choice of interpreting the
exception based on that error code, and wrapping it in a
MessageDialog/window or do the usual 'errormgr.showerrors()'.
Exceptions seem a more flexible approach to me. That is, if you can live
with the fact that by using it, you're violating the 'exceptions for
behavioral anomalies' software engineering principle !
Best wishes.
Eric Pereira
Forte Consultant
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Kallambella, Ajith" <[email protected]>
To: "'Mark Sundsten'" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Raising Exceptions Vs returning error codes
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 08:52:39 -0500
Reply-To: "Kallambella, Ajith" <[email protected]>
Mark,
Identifying conditions where you would rather use an exception
to an error_code ( and vice-versa ) normally depends on
your application design. Usually exceptions
are used to handle behavioral anomalies which are
not expected during the normal course of execution of
the program, and which would affect the continuity of
your algorithm if ignored. Examples would be a fatal
error, a semantically invalid( but syntactically-valid
token ) etc.
Error_codes and return status's can be used to handle
anticipated and recoverable errors. Example would
be presentation layer validations. In any normal
UI system, the user is expected to make errors and it
would be annoying to throw an exception( and to handle
it ), every time user enters wrong data. A well
modeled client layer should not only handle
data-validation errors , but should be smart enough
to encourage users to input correct or
"near-correct" data. Examples could be
making use of look-up windows etc. Interestingly,
Express uses exceptions to handle data-validations.
As you see, exceptions fit well into your processing
logic where severity of damage caused by an error
is more. Where as error_codes fit well into presentation
logic( and some not-so-critical processing logic ) where
errors are usually recoverable and normal path of
execution can be easily restored.
Hope this helps. I would be very interested to hear
what others have to say.
Ajith Kallambella. M
Forte Systems Engineer,
International Business Corporation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sundsten [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 1998 2:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Raising Exceptions vs returning error codes
When dealing with error handling, I find myself struggling with the
choice
of
raising exceptions (and handling them) from the caller
vs returning an error code of somekind.
When would you want to use one over the other?
Should you always use exception handling?
Any discussion would be appreciated.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>-
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>Hi Steve !
Probably the following explanation might help in resolving the issue raised by
you:
At a more abstract level, there is only one thing, i.e. the EVENT. According to
it's definition, an event is a relatively infrequent occurrence in one portion (lets
call it event raiser) of the application, which some other portion (or portions,
lets call them event handlers) (of the same application) are interested to respond
to it. Now there are two scenarios:
(A) Event raiser and Event handler(s) are being executed under different threads
of control (Asynchronous) and
(B) Event raiser and Event Handler(s) are being executed under same thread of
control (Synchronous).
So, Exception Handling belongs to scenario B where the method raising the
exception (Event Raiser or exception raiser) and the method handling it (Event
Handler or exception block) are under the same thread of control. More ever it has
to be insured that at a time only one handler (first the inner most one) receives
the message.
Forté provides a generic Event handling mechanism (Post Event and Event Loop) to
handle the scenario A (which is the more generic one). But it also provides a
specialized Event Handling mechanism (Raise Exception and Exception block) to
efficiently handle the relatively simple scenario B. Why I am saying that the later
is efficient because it won't be needing to register the event queue address of the
interested task (after all there is only one task involved) and put the event
message in queue.
Finally let me mentioned that it is just my view based on the understanding I
have and it may not be true. Only a person from forté can confirm it. I will really
appreciate if somebody correct and or refine it.
Wish a Very Very Happy New Year to all Forté Users
Regard,
Kailash.
[email protected] wrote:
I would agree with Eric entirely. Exceptions seem to me to be a much more
complete solution to the problem of error handling. A little bit of effort up
front in making clear the strategy for exception handling and specifying the
exceptions that can be raised by a class\method will provide an excellent method
for error handling.
In the case of ensuring exceptions are always handled, a top level handler for
GenericException will usually do the job, allowing you to write error
information out to logs, screen, etc, and then shut down gracefully.
The only issue I would raise with exceptions is that they are not propagated
outside an asynchronous task. If an exception is not handled within an
asynchronous, it will not propagate to the task that started that asynchronous
task. Forte provides return and exception events when starting asynchronous
tasks to cope with this, but it seems a shame to have one method of dealing with
errors (exceptions) for synchronous behaviour, and another (events) for
asynchronous behaviour.
Steve Elvin
Systems Developer
Frontline Ltd.
UK
Mark,
The problem with return codes is that there is an underlying assumption
that the receiver will always catch and interpret that error code. This
may or may not be good thing, depending on how you architect your
application. If, on the other hand, you want to ensure that an error is
always handled, if not by the receiver then by the Forte, Exceptions are
the way to go. To extend this mechanism further, I would subclass
GenericException and created my own error code attribute on that
subclass. That way the receiver has the choice of interpreting the
exception based on that error code, and wrapping it in a
MessageDialog/window or do the usual 'errormgr.showerrors()'.
Exceptions seem a more flexible approach to me. That is, if you can live
with the fact that by using it, you're violating the 'exceptions for
behavioral anomalies' software engineering principle !
Best wishes.
Eric Pereira
Forte Consultant
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Kallambella, Ajith" <[email protected]>
To: "'Mark Sundsten'" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Raising Exceptions Vs returning error codes
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 08:52:39 -0500
Reply-To: "Kallambella, Ajith" <[email protected]>
Mark,
Identifying conditions where you would rather use an exception
to an error_code ( and vice-versa ) normally depends on
your application design. Usually exceptions
are used to handle behavioral anomalies which are
not expected during the normal course of execution of
the program, and which would affect the continuity of
your algorithm if ignored. Examples would be a fatal
error, a semantically invalid( but syntactically-valid
token ) etc.
Error_codes and return status's can be used to handle
anticipated and recoverable errors. Example would
be presentation layer validations. In any normal
UI system, the user is expected to make errors and it
would be annoying to throw an exception( and to handle
it ), every time user enters wrong data. A well
modeled client layer should not only handle
data-validation errors , but should be smart enough
to encourage users to input correct or
"near-correct" data. Examples could be
making use of look-up windows etc. Interestingly,
Express uses exceptions to handle data-validations.
As you see, exceptions fit well into your processing
logic where severity of damage caused by an error
is more. Where as error_codes fit well into presentation
logic( and some not-so-critical processing logic ) where
errors are usually recoverable and normal path of
execution can be easily restored.
Hope this helps. I would be very interested to hear
what others have to say.
Ajith Kallambella. M
Forte Systems Engineer,
International Business Corporation.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Sundsten [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 1998 2:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Raising Exceptions vs returning error codes
When dealing with error handling, I find myself struggling with the
choice
of
raising exceptions (and handling them) from the caller
vs returning an error code of somekind.
When would you want to use one over the other?
Should you always use exception handling?
Any discussion would be appreciated.
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/>-
To unsubscribe, email '[email protected]' with
'unsubscribe forte-users' as the body of the message.
Searchable thread archive <URL:http://pinehurst.sageit.com/listarchive/> -
sys.webforms.page request manager server error exception:An unknown error occured while processing the request on server. The status code returned from the server was:0 We got this response(In firebug console) when we try to click on link (after leave webpage for 3 minuts ideal) which is AJAX based. Please reply ASAP because its urgent.
Hi SP,
Please check if the following web config appSettins value settings from SSRS server could fix the issue (Note, back up your original web config file before any modification).
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10911610/ssrs-webpage-error-status-code-500
http://srinivasbn.blogspot.in/2013/09/syswebformspagerequestmanagerservererro.html
http://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/782155/ssrs-2012-failed-with-win32-error-0x03e3
If you have more questions about the SSRS error logs related to this issue, you can post in the SSRS forum for a better assistance with more experts.
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/home?forum=sqlreportingservices
Thanks
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place. -
ECL Viewer 5 raise exceptions viewing tif drawings
Hello all,
Bit of a strange one here that hopefully someone may be able to help me with...
We are (still) running 4.6C, on Ora 9.2.0.7 over Windows.
We are running 640 Gui patched to 24
We have deployed (in a failed attempt to stop the error I will describe below) ECL viewer 5.1.3.
Client machines are running XP with SP2
Error:
after entering MM03 and choosing Additional Data > Document Data we click on an attchment (doc type DRG) and choose to view via the display (glasses) icon. The tif file (which is copied into C:\temp) opens. many of the tif files (scanned drawings) have multiple pages so we move to the next page by clicking 'Navigation' > 'next'.
The problem is that after a seemingly random amount of clicks on to next pages a raise exception occurs. After the short dump it is no longer possible to view the document again as we get the error 'file c:\temp\xxxxx.tif cannot be created' and so the only way to view the drawing is either to access the file from the temp directory or completly log out of SAP and relog back in.
i have searched for notes and we were advised to deploy the 5.1.3 viewer which only seems to have made it worse because before the 5.1.3 deployment we were getting many short dumps but the user oddly didn't see the short dump on their screens - now 5.1.3 is in place the user now sees the short dump and calls the support desk very often.
Has anyone been unfortunate enough to have experienced this before or anyone got any brain waves????
yours thankful in advance and loosing the will to live,
Andy
ps here is the short dump extract:
Error analysis
A RAISE statement in the program "CL_GUI_CFW====================CP " raised the
exception
condition "CNTL_ERROR".
Since the exception was not intercepted by a superior program
in the hierarchy, processing was terminated.
Short description of exception condition:
For detailed documentation of the exception condition, use
Transaction SE37 (Function Library). You can take the called
function module from the display of active calls.
How to correct the error
If the error occurred in a non-modified SAP program, you may be
able to find a solution in the SAP note system.
If you have access to the note system yourself, use the following
search criteria:
"RAISE_EXCEPTION"
"CL_GUI_CFW====================CP " or "CL_GUI_CFW====================CM00P "
"UPDATE_VIEW"
or
"CL_GUI_CFW====================CP " "CNTL_ERROR"
or
"SAPMMG01 " "CNTL_ERROR"
If you cannot solve the problem yourself, please send the
following documents to SAP:
1. A hard copy print describing the problem.
To obtain this, select the "Print" function on the current screen.
2. A suitable hardcopy prinout of the system log.
To obtain this, call the system log with Transaction SM21
and select the "Print" function to print out the relevant
part.
3. If the programs are your own programs or modified SAP programs,
supply the source code.
To do this, you can either use the "PRINT" command in the editor or
print the programs using the report RSINCL00.Hi Andy,
I would recommend you to upgrade to the latest available ECL Viewer version 6.
Please see SAP note 1083901.
Further please upgrade also your SAPGUI to the latest patch level as explained in note 164203. After this upgrade please un-install your ECL Viewer 5.1.3 by using one of the following mehtods:
Search for WebViewer2d.dll file. If it is present at more than one place then it means ECL Viewer is installed more than once without uninstalling the previous version (You can check the folders and should be able to see all the dll's for ECL Viewer such WebViewer3d.dll/Printing.dll etc to make sure that there is not only single file but the whole installation).
In this case:
A) Uninstall the version integrated with SAP GUI by using SAP Installation scripts. You need to uncheck the 'EAI Viewer' component in 'General Add-on' option.
B) Check add/remove program and if there is an entry like SAP Viewer, uninstall it.
After this search again, and you should not get WebViewer2d.dll file on machine. Now reinstall the latest Viewer. This should solve most of the issue related to inconsistencies.
Then install the latest ECL Viewer 6 and the issue should be solved.
Best regards,
Christoph -
Error text missing in raising exception (In ABAP mapping)
Hi,
iam using ABAP Mapping for 1 interface.
Based on some condition i am raising exception with error text. When i executed this in SXI_Mapping_test it's showing the Error text. But when i execute the interface directly error text is missing in the Error details.
can any one figure out y its not coming..
regards
KishoreHi,
I think you need to write the error to mapping trace.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ba/e18b1a0fc14f1faf884ae50cece51b/content.htm
Regards
Vijaya -
Error in Raising exceptions in a method and handling the same in the WF
Hi All
I tried to implement Raising exceptions in a method and handling the same in the workflow
in the same way given in SAPtechnical site .
1.by adding a error msg in exception parameter .
2. if the select query fails, to fetch the agent then :exit_return 9001 'ztable name' space space space.
3.in the Background activity in which this method is called there automatically one outcome appears ,and I hav acitvated that outcome and in that done what need to be done for that error handling - just send a mail to concern person .
4. in the normal outcome of the activity , the step to be executed are there .
but its not working , if exception come then the WF stuck there only . it do not follow the exception outcome .
Kindly help me , How can I do the exception handly in WF.
thanks & Regards
Kakoli> That is usually the case - you catch an error in the underlying program and pass that back so the workflow can go into error.
> You're doing it correctly.
I don't think that's quite right.
If you define an error/exception in a method, it is automatically mapped to an outcome of the step/task.
If you activate that outcome, then you can handle the exception in a branch of the workflow.
For example: 'Remote connection is down, please contact Basis'
The step should only go into error if an outcome occurs that you have NOT activated.
So the original question is valid. Please give some more information on what the error message is..
chrs
Paul -
Raising exceptions in PL/SQL
Hi Friends
I have the following code:
declare
var1....
var2....
cursor c1
begin
insert stmt;
update stmt;
update stmt;
for r1 in c1 loop
end loop;
end;
I will be having about 6-7 million rows every month to process. To raise exceptions, I am thinking of either of the following options:
Option 1_
declare
var1....
var2....
var3 exception;
var4 exception;
var5 exception;
cursor c1
begin
insert stmt;
update stmt;
IF SQL%NOTFOUND then
var3;
end if;
update stmt;
IF SQL%NOTFOUND then
var4;
end if;
for r1 in c1 loop
end loop;
IF SQL%NOTFOUND then
var5;
end if;
Exception
when var3 then blah blah
when var4 then blah blah
when var5 then blah blah
end;
Option 2_
declare
var1....
var2....
cursor c1
begin
insert stmt;
update stmt;
update stmt;
for r1 in c1 loop
end loop;
Exception
when others then blah blah
end;
In terms of performance, which option is better? And is there any better option?
Thanks....In terms of performance, which option is better? And is there any better option?If you consider in terms of performance i think you cant find any difference in both ways.
But your both code does not do the same thing. They are entirely different. They are not the same.
For example, If your UPDATE statement fails with a Too many rows error what will happen.
In the first procedure the procedure will raise the error to the client. But in the second case the error is caught by the WHEN OTHERS block.
So now here the real thing is what you do in the WHEN OTHERS block. Do you suppress the error? Do you return NULL? What do you do, That is what matters.
Your Bla..Bla..Bla.. part in the EXCEPTION is very important. Most of them do mistake there.
WHEN OTHERS is a great feature. But it must be used properly. Its like a very sharp knife. If you dont use it properly there will be blood. -
Raising Exceptions in WDA?
Hi,
I want to know about raising exception in wda. Please explain in details.
Scenario: I have one input field as mandatory. if i click the button without filling that input field, self defined exception should raise. How to do this?
Thanks,
Gopi.hi ,
place a UI message area in the RootElement Containeru cn make use of control wizard ( CONTROL + F7) to generate error or exception messages
select the radio button , generate messages and choose the method report_error_message
this code wud be automatically generated thru code wizard
* get message manager
DATA lo_api_controller TYPE REF TO if_wd_controller.
DATA lo_message_manager TYPE REF TO if_wd_message_manager.
lo_api_controller ?= wd_this->wd_get_api( ).
CALL METHOD lo_api_controller->get_message_manager
RECEIVING
message_manager = lo_message_manager
* report message
CALL METHOD lo_message_manager->report_error_message
EXPORTING
message_text = 'Error_Text' " Give your error text here.
regards,
amit -
Raising exceptions in event handlers?
Hi
Is it possible to raise exceptions in event handler? As an example, I added a listener to a UnitOfWork, and implemented the preCommitUnitOfWork() method. In the method, I'm performing some operations, and if something goes wrong, I need to roll back the entire UnitOfWork. Is this possible to raison an exception, or is there some other way to acheive this?
Thanks
Regards
EricHi
Is it possible to raise exceptions in event handler? As an example, I added a listener to a UnitOfWork, and implemented the preCommitUnitOfWork() method. In the method, I'm performing some operations, and if something goes wrong, I need to roll back the entire UnitOfWork. Is this possible to raison an exception, or is there some other way to acheive this?Eric,
I tried this and had some success with a simple test case. I created an exception that extends the oracle.toplink.exceptions.TopLinkException class. Then I added the throws clause to the preCommitUnitOfWork event handler. Throwing my custom exception (that extends TopLinkException) from the event handler works fine and should allow you to retry your update, etc. Note that as long as the exception is thrown at "preCommit" time you should not need to roll anything back as the updates were not applied to the cache or DB. Also, if you applied updates to your registered clones instead of the original objects, the original objects state should be unchanged.
Hope this helps,
Pete Farkas -
Hi All,
while Running Client Proxies from se80 im getting Following error. i already checked all the Services All are active only. can any one suggest me:
SOAP:1.026 SRT: HTTP-Code 500: ("Internal Server Error")
Exception of class CX_AI_SYSTEM_FAULT
RFC Trace:
**** Trace file opened at 20140630 124650 IST, by disp+work
**** Versions SAP-REL 721,0,201 RFC-VER U 3 1460390 MT-SL
XRFC> Begin of user trace
XRFC>
XRFC>
<
XRFC> TRACE SOAP RUNTIME - header
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC>
XRFC> SESSION_ID : 0002425553A5ECFC63B114C4E1000000C0A80141
XRFC> TS_CALL
: 20140630071647.5930180
<
XRFC> SY_UNAME : SAPADMIN
<
XRFC> HOSTNAME : SOLAR-DEV
<
XRFC> SY_SID
: DEV
<
XRFC> SY_MANDT : 001
<
XRFC> SYS_NR
: 01
<
XRFC> APPLSERVER : SOLAR-DEV_DEV_01
<
XRFC> ISPRESCHED : X
<
XRFC> PARENT_ID : ROOT_CALL_ID
<
XRFC> REQ_SIZE : 1821
<
XRFC> RESP_SIZE : 75
<
XRFC> DURATION : 2246
<
XRFC> NETHDRTIME : 2246
<
XRFC> CALL_STATE : 2
<
XRFC> ERRORTYPE : SYSFAIL
<
XRFC> ERRORAREA : COREMSG
<
XRFC> CTXDP_TYPE : SOAP_RUNTIME
<
XRFC> SYNC_ASYNC : S
<
XRFC> LOCATION : C
<
XRFC> DIRECTION : O
<
XRFC> REQ_ID
: 52EDA553B163C414E1000000C0A80141
<
XRFC> RESP_ID
: 00000000000000000000000000000000
<
XRFC> MSG_STATE : 114
<
XRFC> IF_NAME_I : YSCO_SAPORDERS_SOAP
<
XRFC> IF_NS_E
<
XRFC> IF_NAME_E :
<
XRFC> ISSHORTCUT :
<
XRFC> TRC_PATT : WSTEST
<
XRFC> TRC_KEY
: 50EDA553B163C414E1000000C0A80141
<
XRFC> TRC_SSID : DEV_01
<
XRFC> TRC_USER : SAPADMIN
<
XRFC> TRC_TS
: 20140630071647
<
XRFC> TRC_COUNT : 98
<
XRFC> TRC_EXT
<
XRFC> COMPLETE : OK
<
XRFC> CALLEDPROG : YSCO_SAPORDERS_SOAP
<
XRFC> SOAP_APPLI : urn:sap-com:soap:runtime:application:client
<
XRFC> CONF_ID
<
XRFC> BIND_ID
<
XRFC> OP_NAME
: InsertPPOrders_Development
<
XRFC> COMM_PATRN : Method:InsertPPOrders_Development
<
XRFC> OP_NS
: http://microsoft.com/webservices/
<
XRFC> REMADDRESS :
<
XRFC> LP_NAME
: YSLP1
<
XRFC> DT_OBJ
: YSCO_SAPORDERS_SOAP
<
XRFC> MEMCONSUMP : 198
<
XRFC> BONAME
<
XRFC> PROCCOMP :
<
XRFC> DEPLOYUNIT :
<
XRFC> <
XRFC>
<
XRFC> TRACE SOAP RUNTIME - trace records
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC> <
XRFC> E SOAP_RUNTIME 20140630071649.8380110 : CL_SOAP_RUNTIME_CLIENT
<
XRFC> ->EXECUTE_PROCESSING Exception handling in SOAP runtime
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC> E SOAP_APPLICATION 20140630071649.8382410 : CL_SOAP_APPLICATION
<
XRFC> _CLIENT ->IF_SOAP_APPLICATION_CS~EXECUTE_PROCESSING Exception
<
XRFC> handling in SOAP runtime
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC> E HTTP_TRANSPORT_BINDING 20140630071649.8368980 : CL_SOAP_HTTP
<
XRFC> _TPBND_ROOT ->HANDLE_STATUS_CODE Received return code 500 (
<
XRFC> Internal Server Error )
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC> E SOAP_RUNTIME 20140630071649.8379970 : CL_SOAP_RUNTIME_CLIENT
<
XRFC> ->EXECUTE_PROCESSING A SOAP Runtime Core Exception occurred in
<
XRFC> method get_http_headers of class CL_SOAP_HTTP_TPBND_ROOT at
<
XRFC> position id 3 with internal error id 1026 and error text SRT:
<
XRFC> HTTP-Code 500: ("Internal Server Error") (fault location is 1 ).
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC>
<
XRFC> E SOAP_APPLICATION 20140630071649.8382290 : CL_SOAP_APPLICATION
<
XRFC> _CLIENT ->IF_SOAP_APPLICATION_CS~EXECUTE_PROCESSING A SOAP Runtime <
XRFC> Core Exception occurred in method get_http_headers of class
<
XRFC> CL_SOAP_HTTP_TPBND_ROOT at position id 3 with internal error id
<
XRFC> 1026 and error text SRT: HTTP-Code 500: ("Internal Server Error") <
XRFC> (fault location is 1 ).
<
XRFC>
<
Find The Attachment for error:Hi Brahmaji,
i also faced with the above problem, activete the srt services in SICF Transaction.
Regards,
Kumar.
Edited by: kmikkili on Nov 18, 2009 11:39 PM -
Hello Guys,
I'm getting the following error when calling a method of a normally
deployed facade session bean.
java.rmi.ServerError: A error occurred the server; nested exception is:
java.lang.AbstractMethodError
It's very confusing, it sometimes appear and sometimes the method is
invoked normally.
Thanks in advance for ur help.
Itani
[att1.html]That error means your are not running xserver process. Or, your ssh connection is not set-up to forward X-11 data.
-
Raise exception in function module call from SAP owned program
I need to raise an exception in a function module to terminate a transaction, display a error message and return to to previous selection screen so the user can fix the error before moving forward.......
How do you do this when the program using the function module is SAP owned?
Thank You!
JeffHi,
After calling the function module, you can do something like this.
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
RAISE EXCEPTION.
ENDIF.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto -
Catching errors in Web Dynpro for Java when thrown from RFC Raise Exception
Hello Developers,
I'm looking for information that explains how a Web Dynpro for Java application responds and processes errors that are thrown from a Raise Exception event within an RFC.
The Exceptions do not appear to be part of the Model and I can't identify how they get processed.
When rfc HRXSS_CAT_WD_RECORD raises exception PERNR_NOT_LOCKED this exception is passed back to the calling webdynpro CAT DC that displays the exception on the web page along with the log.
I would like to display a friendlier message and without the log. Any information on how to customize the handling of this error would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you,
Terry[see here|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.highlightedcontent?documenturi=%2flibrary%2fuser-interface-technology%2fwdJava%2FHowtoHandleExceptionsEffectivelyWhileWorkingwithWebDynproJava%28WDJ%29.pdf]
Maybe you are looking for
-
Remote for External I/O Console(Big Silver o
Ok I think I have a small problem with my sound card and External I/O Console and the remote that came with it. I bought the card on it'ss own and it worked perfect right form the get go, then I ordered the External I/O Console and suddenly the Auto
-
Embedding video in KN3 and exporting to SWF
G'day. I have KN3 on a PB G4 with QT7 Pro and iLife '05. I'm using iMovie to create a credit role video for the last slide of my slide deck with the intention of embedding narration and exporting the whole caboodle to a SWF file. I'm having problems
-
I cannot figure out how to delete my old email address from the mail program. Everytime I click new email, the drop down "Account" button at the top under the subject line shows my old email account. I deleted every place I could find it but it still
-
Unable to Download any Files in Safari.
Hi, Hopefully someone might be able to help with this one..... I tried a trial verson of speed downloader and then uninstalled. Ever since then I cant download anything through Safari. I have followed the directions at removing speed downloader and g
-
VA01 ITEM Level Exits for item validation
Hi Team, I have a requirement of filling some custom fields upon entering the item in the VA01/VA02. For that I need to know the suitable exits where I can fill this. The exit has to get triggered when the user gives the material and presses enter. P