BW Specific Change

Hi gurus,
I got one requirement like thisin DEV side.
BW-Specific Change.
Possible change to existing ODS/PO Line Item Attributes(Ref: o01).
Here I m having an exixting ODS namely ZODS_p01. But I m not having PO Line Item Attributes in the above existing ODS. Here my doubt is possible change means what, i mean adding(include) newly PO Line Item Attributes in existing ODS or any other meaning? Generally changes(Possible) in existing ODS means what(changes it maybe & where can we do these in ODS)? I m not understanding this clearly?
Any inputs r greatly appreciated.
Thanks Inadvance,
Yogeswaran.

Hi Yogi,
Yes u can change the existing ODS by adding the new PO line item attributes normally there is no specific methods to do that. we will do this normal way. As of ODS is overwritten what ever data is added it will be overwritten. it will not maintain duplicate data.
regards,
anil

Similar Messages

How Does EJB 2.0 Specification Change the BC4J?

Hi,
I had read the while paper of BC4J thoroughly. The following statement interested me:
"As Oracle9iAS, WebLogic, and other J2EE application server vendors begin to rollout complete support for the new EJB 2.0 specification in the first half of 2002, a new release of the BC4J framework will be released which includes support for the new local entity beans. This work entails enhancing our lightweight, local entity classes to support the necessary interface to be lightweight EJB 2.0 Local Entity Beans. ...."
I have searched all the documents about BC4J, but I couldn't find anything more about "How Does EJB 2.0 Specification Change the BC4J?"
I think the "Local EJB Entity Beans" is similar with BC4J DAO. So is there someone who can tell me how does EJB 2.0 Specification change the BC4J?
Any help would be appreciated!
James

We support using local CMP entity beans as your persistence layer for your entity objects, but as it adds an extra layer, it's turned out (in all honesty) to not be that popular a feature.
The performance offered by the simpler BC4J entity object (plain old java class) is fine, and the notion of using simple java beans for your model is widely recognized as a fine option for J2EE applications.
For example, check out Rod Johnson's book called "Expert one-to-one: J2EE Design and Development" which covers this subject excellently.

Can the specific changes/updates made to a customer be captured with the detail of changes?

One of our 11i Customer placed the below requirement:
We are creating a report that will extract customers that have changed or updated in Oracle. The user requested to include also the specific change made to the customer. Is there a way that we can capture what are the changes/updates made to a customer?
We understand that the last update date and updated by could be tracked. But, is it possible to find what change was done in which field?
Gurus, kindly respond.

This will only tell you if the user you're interested in was the most recent person to update that table, but not what they did, and if they were not the most recent, then all trace will be gone.
Have you considered enabling auditing? It's not going to provide details of anything which has already happened, but it keeps fairly detailed records, but at the cost of a large performance hit.

How to trace specific changes made to an object?

Hi experts,
Is there any log or trace file in the SAP Portal where to check specific changes made to an object by an administrator ? (i.e. current and former value for "Maximum Automatic Height" iview property, who changed that value, when...).
Thanks in advance.

Hi ,
As you told some changes identified. so navigate to corresponnding portal obejcts and find modified and last changed by similar properties in the property editor object.
portal activity reports gives how many users visted specific pcd object but not who visited. You can use pcd filter to compare properties.
Regards,
Koti Reddy

Specific changes are left undetected when using proxy indirection

Hello!
Recently, the following issue have been identified:
ObjectReferenceMapping together with ProxyIndirectionPolicy and *UnitOfWorkValueHolder fails to identify specific changes - setting a reference to 'null' when the attribute's value was not instantiated previously.
Detailed description:
Consider we have 2 objects: A and B, and A has OneToOneMapping to B and uses ProxyIndirection.
In initial moment we have A1 that references B1 in DB.
Then we register A1 for modification. What we have in memory in UnitOfWork? Something like the following:
A1(Clone) with attribute for B reference uninstantiated;
A1(Backup) with <null> reference for B, as the attribute is expected to be retrieved when we access B from A1(Clone).
Then we set reference in A1(Clone) for B to <null>.
This change then will not be identified during commit phase, because of the result of getAttributeValueFromObject both for B reference in A1(Clone) and A1(Backup) is <null>. This part is clearly visible from the ObjectReferenceMapping.compareForChange method code:
if ( !owner.isNew() ) {
backUpAttribute = getAttributeValueFromObject(backUp);
if ( (backUpAttribute == null) && (cloneAttribute == null) ) {
return null;
Accessing the B field in A1(Clone) fixes the problem, because in this case backUpAttribute value is initialized through *UnitOfWorkValueHolder.
So it seems the part should be reworked to handle such cases, it seems reasonable that fields in backup clones that are using proxy indirection should be initialized even if not accessed to contain all required information to allow correct comparision in such cases.
Can somebody from TopLink team comment this?
Thanks,
Sergey

This does appear to be an issue. I will log this problem internally, you may want to follow it up with support.
A work around is to instantiate the proxy in your set methods.
i.e.
public void setAddress(Address newAddress) {
if (this.address != null) {
this.address.hashCode();
this.address = newAddress;
}

OS specific changes in ABAP program

Hi guys,
I know due to OS migration ABAP program changes are not mostly required.
possibly Except few things.
1-External commands check
2-File path or logical path settings check.
3-Native sql check.
Apart from this is there any possible that OS specific settings would be used in ABAP programs. I want to find out those things in advance.
Could somebody shed light on this..
In my case Os is unix to solaris 11. so just want to know if any specific things has to be checked or taken care after OS migration.
Advice please.
Thanks.
Baasha.

Hi,
Did exactly the same, everything was fine. Your check scope is perfectly fine.
Just to add, that external progs. could be used in jobs as well, and can be called directly from ABAP.

HT1386 How to change fist time sync specifications (change back from icloud to outlook?

How to change fist time sync specifications for calendar (change back from icloud to outlook?

Go to icloud.com on your computer, sign into your iCloud account, click Calendars. Are your events still there? Also, what version of OS X are you running on your mac and what version of iOS are you running on your phone?

Field Specific Change Log

Hi All,
Is it possible to only log the changes for specific fields of a table? My guess is this is not possible but it is suggested not to log data changes due to performance issues. If we were to limit the tables to specific fields, perhaps we can limit the affect on performance.
Also, how big of a hit on performance can we expect if we only add logging for one additional table?
Thanks. Points will be awarded for helpful responses.

Thanks, Anji, but I was wondering if it was possible to set specific fields. So let's say I have table ADRC and I only want to see changes to field NAME1. Can I set only this field to be logged instead of the entire table?
Message was edited by:
John S

Making Canada specifi changes to RPIPSR00 Payscale Reclassification Report

Hi Guru's,
We got the requirement to work around the standard SAP report Payscale Reclassification which RPIPSR00. Since this is not suits to our client specific Canada changes we are required to create a custom program or need to impliment BADI. Please find the following changes that we need to impliment in the custom progrem.
1.The program should automatically progress full-time employees which have reached the threshold (time in level or hours worked) to progress to the next level.
2. Employees that are part-time and must meet a certain number of actual hours to jump to next step in the progression program and this is done manually by HR. These employees should be excluded from the progression program but are included on the progression report.
3. Employees that require an examination prior to moving to the next level do not progress automatically. The manager notifies HR once they have completed the appropriate training and HR manually progresses them to the next step. These employees should be excluded from the progression program but are included on the progression report as due to progress pending examination. Need an indicator within the rules configuration to be able to note levels which require an examination prior to progression
3. Check for a temporary rate higher than next step rate
4.Not progress any employees that are part-time or require certification.
5. Program needs to read the IT0019 Date stored in u201CStep Progression Base Dateu201D field to determine when the previous progression date was. Step Progression program will need to update this date when the program is run to match the begin date (BEGDA) of IT0008 Reason Code u201CStep Progressionu201D.
6.Program should run report to automatically update the Pay Scale/Level for eligible employees and reflect this update on their IT0008 basic pay record.
Could you please advise me on this whether do we have any BADI's or Enhancements to achieve this requirement or need to go for Custom program with the prototype soluiton.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Regards,
J.
Moved the thread from SAP HCM to SAP North America

Dear Amit,
Thanks for your reply..
I have maintained the TARIFF and LGMST properly..
One employee has joined 02.01.2011.In configuration i have maintained the condition 1 year(11 months)..I have maintained the IT0041.
If run report RPIPSR00 i am getting the error..
Please correct me..
Regards,
R.Rajesh

ESS / MSS WDA Customer specific Changes in EHP6 / EP 7.3

Hi
we have deployed SAP Portal 7.3, EHP6 in that we are planning to use WDA based BP (BPERP5WDA 1.50 and MSS Add on 1.0). We are planning to roll out more than 15 countries.
W.r.to the country wise we have the requirement to hide / visible, edit , read only for some of the fields in ESS and MSS based WDA applications. In some cases we need to hide / make it as read only as globally.
I could see the following two different options, FPM based approach, Administrator Personalization (by adding sap-config-mode=X in the URL of WDA).
And also I could see in some of the SCN thread,
Say for example, w.r.to the Admin personalization where for one user who hides the field in English (US) the same field appears if we login as English (UK). Is it based on languages in User DB of Portal (or) the country / molga parameter belongs to that user in HR Org structure.
Please let me know, as per my requirement, which is the right approach either FPM based approach / Administrator Personalization.
Also let me know, when we implement (either hide / read only) changes through Admin Personalization, I understand it creates some entry in the SAP DB table. Is there any specific parameters are getting added molga/ country details when we make the changes through Admin Personalization in backend table?
Kind Regards,
Prasath

Hi Reddy
YEs I have a requirement based on the applicaiton wise in MSS Add on 1.0. w.r.to the country.
Since this is the another question, I have created seperate thread for the same.
could you check the same and let me know your feedback
http://scn.sap.com/thread/3554348
Regards,
Prasath
Employee profile in MSS Add on 1.0 – removal of tabs w.r.to Country

Transactional replicated articles Identity Specification changes when Publication was scripted

I recently scripted out a Publication on my SQL 2008 R2 (Standard) Server because I was in the process of restoring the publishing database and needed to tear down/ rebuild replication. After restoring, running my script to recreate replication I noticed
that the the tables in the subscriber went from having their Identity Specification set to Yes to No.
I had manually tore down and rebuilt this same publication in the past, without scripting, and not seen this behavior so I used the UI (SSMS) and did that again. This time the identity specification was back to Yes on the columns where it should be.
Why would scripting out an existing publication cause this to happen? What setting or behavior am I missing?
Thank you

Please verify the below link:
http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1274/change-not-for-replication-value-for-sql-server-identity-columns/
Solution:
The "Not For Replication" setting for identity columns allows replication to pass the ID value from the publisher to the subscriber without the subscriber creating a new ID. Since identity columns will always generate a new number when records
are inserted, this setting allows you to ensure the values on both your publisher and subscribers stay in synch.
Regards, Pradyothana DP. Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue. Please Mark This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue. ========================================================== http://www.dbainhouse.blogspot.in/

Deploying application with specific changes

Hi guys,
I think I might have a weird issue and scratching my head with this one :)
I have an MSI file of a certain application that I packaged with EMCO Packager. When creating a package it I defined a setting that I want to use with this application (which modifies a specific .ini file). When running the MSI locally on a PC everything
works great and the setting is set to how I defined it, but when I deploy the same MSI with SCCM using the same install parameters the setting is changed to default. This issue is also not specific to this one application but other applications as well.
Do you guys have any ideas?
Thanks a lot!
Steve

OK. So you are expecting your (self-created) MSI, run in the System context (which is what ConfigMgr does when running an app as system), to drop the ini into another user's directory?
This is possible, but it requires self-healing which involves some added complexity and a deeper knowledge of Windows Installer.
You can also use Active Setup:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/aruns_blog/archive/2011/11/02/10176957.aspx
http://blogs.flexerasoftware.com/installtalk/2011/11/using-active-setup-to-repair-user-settings.html
Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

Has the FTP Root Directory specification changed in CS6?

I recently upgraded from CS5.5 to CS6 and it appears that the method of specifying the root directory for the remote server has changed. For example I had a root file specification of /htdocs/milehighmgc/ that worked perfectly in CS5.5 both in the Site Manager and when I connected to the server from the Files Panel. After upgrading to CS6 it sttill would connect from the Site Manager but when I tried to connect from the Files Panel I got an error message that said "An FTP error occurred - cannot make connection to the host." I was able to get it to go by adding another / to the root folder definition so that it read //htdocs/milehighmgc/.
Has anyone out there seen this? Is there a proper syntax that I am not aware of after using this stuff for 3 years?

No, it hasn't changed, and I've never seen a double-slash at the beginning of the path, either. How odd.

Firefox won't save changes I make to the applications actions panel. Specifically, changing pdf files to open in Firefox

If I change the option to "Use Adobe acrobat in Firefox", the next time I open Firefox, it will have reverted its setting back to "Use adobe Acrobat 7.0"

Using "System Restore" can cause your Firefox installation to get corrupted because not all files are restored (only files in a white-list), so be cautious with using System Restore.<br />
You need to (re)install software that was affected.<br />
Remove the Firefox program folder (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\) before reinstalling a freshly downloaded Firefox copy to do a clean install.
You can find the latest Firefox release in all languages and for all Operating Systems here:
*Firefox 11.0.x: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/all.html
Remove all rules for Firefox and the plugin-container from the permissions list in the firewall and let your firewall ask again for permission to get full unrestricted access to internet for Firefox and the plugin-container process and the updater process.
See:
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Server+not+found
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Firewalls

QM-Inspection Lot Specification changes

Dear Gurus,
We have maintained some specifications in the inspection plan.
during Delivery, Inprocess during process order relese Lot got generated with specifications maintained in the inspection plan.
Now user finds a problem in the specification, so he corrected in the inspection plan.
Is there any possibility of read again the master data for new specification for the already existing lot.
or is there any possibility of editing the inspection lot with new specification.
Thanks in advance,
Siva

Dear Siva
You can attach the new specification, if there has been no result recording or any activity confirmation done for the lot. Here is the steps for assigning the inspection plan again
1) Go to QA02
2) Menu > INspection lot > Reset Sample
3) Enter & Save
4) QA02
5) Inspection specification > Assign task list by click on Task/ specification
6) Go to Sample, do the SAmple calculation
7) Save
8) Check whehter lot status is Rel
Regards
gajesh

BW Specific Change

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for