BWD to BWP version compare

Hi all,
maybe a stupid question but is there an easy way to compare a set of objects between systems (BWD and BWP). My predecessor had SAP-ALL in both boxes and so things are a bit out of wack. I guess BWD is accurate and BWP may be the same.
Is the only way to collect and transport from BWD to BWP? If so what settings should I use? How to I transport custom ABAP used for processing flat files?

Hi Barnaby,
I Guess BWD & BWP are your systems ? BWD for Development environment, and BWP for Production ?
I think you will need abaper's advices...

Similar Messages

Function module for Version compares in different systems

Hi,
Can you let me know which function module would provide me with the version compare log.
i need this comparison log to be generated internally by my program.

Hi,
I debugged what the Std does in version comparison. It basically calls :
the FM : SVRS_SHORT2LONG_NAME
for both the programs to be compare and passes the values to
the Report : RSVRSRS3
Set a break-point within the Form : compare_versions in the include : LSVRLF04
and check how the values are getting populated.
Cheers,
Remi

Version compare during SPDD

Hello, We are in the process of carrying upgrade. I am using SPDD. I see some yellow lights for table indexes. For most of the table indexes, when i do the version compare i see that almost 99% of the old version are identical to the current version and need no changes to the new version. Am i doing the version comparison correctly? Do i need to create a Transport (TR) even if the versions are identical? Thanks

Hi Ricky,
It's this function and the literature says it's a valid choice during SPDD phase:
Yes, the object should get added to SPDD TR and should disappear from SPDD after refresh.
However, after reading the follwing helptext to Message no. 0M400 (I do think it applies only to using SE95 to reset, not the SPDD):
"In the Modification Browser (Transaction se95), you can reset modified objects to the original.
Caution: In the SPDD phase, you should never use SE95 to reset objects because activation is required for this. Instead, modify the object - for example, using SE11 - so that it is identical with the original object. For this purpose, use the compare option in Version Management."
you also could choose to play safe, accept the "nonexistant" Modification, and reset to original in SE95 only after you are through with SPDD and DDIC Activation and have released the SPDD TR. You'll record the resets to original in another TR then.
Reset to original is also possible only if you do have the original in the system; use menu Modifications->Display Original to verify that.
cheers
Janis

What are the enhancements of ECC5.0 version compared to 4.6c

HI
what are the enhancements of ECC5.0 version compared to 4.6c

With a little experimentation, I've discovered a number of useful things about iTunes in the past few weeks. Most important is that the iTunes folder (remembering to remove the iTunes music first) can actually be backed up to another drive, and then even shared with another computer directly. Very simple and effective.

Issue with links on WAD Template when transporting from BWD to BWP

Hello experts,
We're facing a problem in our project.
Until now we we're working directly in a productive system, but last week we've copied our productive system (BWP) to the development system (BWD).
Now we change almost everything in BWD and then transport to BWP.
However, our templates that have been constructed in the Web Application Designer (WAD) have some links that have dependency on the string 'bwd', example:
"http://sapbwd.tap.pt:8"
All the links with this issue are ragarding to workbooks constructed over the Excel (BEx Analyzer).
When we transport the template to BWP the link remains the same, where the link should be "http://sapbwp.tap.pt:8"
We would like to eliminate this issue, eliminating the reference to the system (BWD) or changing the link name when the template was transported to BWP.
Is there any easy way to workaround this problem?
We're counting with your knowledge and know how to help us.
Best Regards,
Rui Romba
Portugal

Hi Rui,
i don't know if understood you well, but if your requirement is to restrict users and queries execution to a specific server the solution is to create logon groups (transaction SMLG1), however this solution have impact not only in reports execution but also in the login options.
In this transaction you define for a group which instance server is allowed, in your case you could specify the server where the reports should run.
I strange the fact of your Wad reports allways open in the correct server, but it could be due to authorization definitions.
Hope it helps.
Renato Pedro

Steps for transporting info source from BWD- BWQ- BWP

Hi all,
any body tell the steps for transporting Infosource from BWD to BWQ to BWP.
Thanks in Advance
Satya

HI Satya,
Go to transport connection select the infosources under it...select objects there select ur infoaource u want to transport-there is an option tpo change the paskage if u want...assign a new request..once the new request is aassigned...then go to SE10 and then release the request. Now its ready for transport.Normally after releasing the request the Basis guys transport the request.
Regards,
Marc.
Message was edited by: Marc

Shocked by lack of features on Mac version compared to Windows. Why?

Just downloaded Premiere elements 11 and shocked to find that the full set of features are not supported on the mac version, most notably the chroma, green and blue keying effects/ filters. Why is this?? I use a mac not as a fashion statement, but because they are the industry standard for creative businesses. ALL photographic, graphic design, editing etc suites use macs, so why give these features to windows and NOT macs? Makes absolutely no sense at all and I am shocked not to mention disappointed!!

There are differences between the Mac and PC platform, and not just with Premiere Elements, but also Premiere Pro. The PC gets more Effects, and Transitions. This was first noted in Premiere Pro CS 3, when it was ported to the Mac. Before, with Premiere Pro 1.0, through CS 2/verson 2.0, the program was PC-only. When PrPro CS 3 was introduced, the Mac-users took note that their PC friends got more than they did.
At that time, there were many posts to the PrPro Forum, regarding the differences. Adobe engineers commented on the differences between how the two platforms handled some aspects of the program - and mainly display functions. This list of Effects & Transitions in CS 3, for Mac and PC, will show what was different between those two platforms: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/460313?tstart=1470 [Note: this was for PrPro, and it has/had many differences, from PrE, so this is not a clear difference chart between PrE for the Mac and the PC, but you can get the idea. It is for background reference use only.]
Something similar happened, when PrPro went from CS 4 to CS 5, which was a 64-bit program ONLY. A lot of Effects and such were lost in the new version, and some were "old stand-bys" for users of the earlier program. In time, a few DID show up in later versions of PrPro, but not all. Some were 32-bit only, and Adobe deemed it too expensive to port all of them to 64-bit, so they were just dropped, and have never reappeared. The same thing happened with many 3rd party plug-ins. Once, they were all 32-bit, and that worked up until CS 5. Most suppliers then went back to the lab, and recoded their plug-ins for 64-bit, but not all. Some just dropped their support for PrPro.
While this does not help you get your job done (ATR's blog post will, however, and that was also why I suggested other Effects for Keying), it shows that PrE is not alone with the differences between platforms.
Good luck and happy editing,
Hunt

Java source version compare

How do you view the code differences for .java files versioned in a web dynpro project? They are not in the src fiolder for either active or inactive DC. I do see they are under the gen_wdp folder but the version tools are disabled there.
This I am assuming as a very common practice but I see nothing in the SAP help. I am using release SP18 of dev studio.

Hi Mike,
The files like TimeEntryView.wdcontroller also have java code in them. This is used while generation. You can use same tool to check differences here for the code also.
You can do one more thing. [ This is a bit tedious:) ]
Take the generated java file in gen_wdp folder and use tools like "WinMerge" to check the difference. [Not a gr8 idea but works ]
Regards,
Ashwani Kr Sharma

How to compare variant(Version compare)

Hi experters.
Can you tell me how to compare variant between DEV and QA system?
I find the transaction variant in my DEV system is a little different from QA system,
so I want to compare them, but there are too many fields..
so can you tell me how to compare them ? is there any easy way to do it?
Regards,

Hi Harry,
Me too did not come across such tool, report which compares 2 variants in 2 systems. ALthough i dont have an answer - felt like sharing and would be good if you come across any such info...
( Also the usage of such tools will be very less how frequent do we get to do that )
Rgds,
Sri
Award points for helpful answers

BWP - BWD Sync

Hello All,
Has anyone had experience with BI upgrades when the production and development environments are out-of-sync?
A little background:
Our NW-2004s BWD and BWQ environments will be on a new box (i.e., a dual landscape for awhile). BWP will be upgraded on the existing box.
The existing BWD and BWQ clients were copied to the new box in preparation for upgrade several months ago. Delays happened in the upgrade process and during this intervening time, development (and transports) were made to BWP within the existing environment.
The months old copy of BWD has now been upgraded to NW-2004s (i.e., new-BWD). BWP has yet to be upgraded.
However, I am wondering what the effect of this mismatch will be with future transports. That is, after BWP is upgraded, it will have objects in a more recent version than the new-BWD.
Has anyone had experience with upgrades when the production environment has more advanced objects than what is in BWD? Any comments and/or solutions that you can propose?
Thanks in advance.
Dave

Hi arjun,
Im not aware that you can sync them as such, but just re-transport the query to prod which will solve your problem. Then close production for chnages which will solve your problem so colleagues cant chnage quieries in prod.
Thanks,
Nick

Compare Version

Hi
Iam working in cProjects 4.0 implementation. Iam testing Simulation Version Compare Feature
I have created Simulation Version for an Operative Project
In Versions Menu, we have selected Version Type : Simulation
I have selected a version I have created : SIM001
I have selected an operative project
I have clicked on "Identify Projects for Comparision"
Error Message is displayed and the details are as follows
Error when processing your request
What has happened?
The URL <> was not called due to an error.
Note
The following error text was processed in the system <> R10 : The node does not contain any elements. VI_ENTRY_COMPARE.1.TARGET_VERSION eꯂ
The error occurred on the application server Removed and in the work process 0 .
The termination type was: RABAX_STATE
Can you pls guide me

Hi,
To create and compare simluations:
1. Open cProjects and goto the project for which you have to create a simulation
Pre-requisite for this is that in your customizing for the project type you have activated the Versions function.
2. go to the versions tab page, select simulations and say create.
3. After creating, make sure you save the simulation.
4. You can now click on the simulation name and simulate the project/ change some parameter values.
5. In order to compare, go to cProjects Select the Versions tb page
6. Click on Compare. Select the version, In project number, select the project version that you have created in the above step.
7. Click on Identify Projects for Compariosn button.
8. Now you shud be able to see the project for which you created version (original project). Version Type is Operational.
9. Click on Compare button.
You will be able to see a complete comparision along with differences, matches and values that cannot be changed.
Regards,
Reema.
PS. Pl award points to useful answers.
Pl write your queries in a more systematic and readable way.

What are the advantages of CRM 2007 version

Hi Experts,
Presently my client using CRM 4.0 version so the requirement is I want impress the client for upgrade the version into CRM 2007. Please give some brief interdiction and what are facilities are available in CRM 2007 or 5.o version compare with using version CRM 4.o
Please suggest
Points will be given
MVN

Hi MVN,
You can find the differences between CRM 4.0, CRM 5.0 to CRM 2007 in the release notes of them at the link provided below.
https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?SHORTKEY=01100035870000429833&SCENARIO=01100035870000000202&
But you need to have an OSS account for accessing this page. Incase if you don't have OSS account, you can create the same at the below link.
https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~sapidp/002006825000100141192000E
Also you can find the CRM 5.2 to CRM 2007 review by customer below.
The specified item was not found.
For any other information, feel free to reply me.
Thanks and Regards,
Pavan Kumar Gali.

Differences between the Mac and PC versions of Premiere Pro CS5

Hello. I am considering to buy the Educational version of Adobe CS5 Production Premium (mainly using Illustrator but once in a while photoshop and Premiere). For Premiere CS5, how is the Mac version compared with the Windows version? Is it better or the same? Thanks

> I'd add that it looks as if some of the Mac documentation is just...missing?
That may very well be the case. I was only in charge of the Premiere Pro documentation for a few weeks (part of June and part of July), and that wasn't enough time to get it into the "I will stake my reputation on it being complete and correct" state that I took years to get the After Effects documentation into.
If you see a gap or error, please leave a comment on the relevant page(s) of the document so that the people who are now in charge will see them. These comments are the most direct line of communication that you have with the documentation team.
Now that I'm in Technical Support, I'll do what I can to advocate for more comprehensive documentation in Help and such.

Comparing iMovieHD vs. iMovie08

I loaded iMovieHD today and noticed that encodings are so much more faster with HD than 08. So I started trying to figure out why. I noticed that a 2 minute clip imported is HUGE in the project where as in 08 it is about actual size(regardless of importing from camera or card). This HD project was over a 1gb in size.
I ended up creating the same size 720P AIC movie file in each version. It took 4 minutes in HD vs 16-18 in '08. The file output sizes was 538mb(HD) to 747mb('08). I compared by viewing in Quicktime at the same timecode. I can tell considerable differences where the larger 747mb('08) was sharper and more vivid. I attribute this to more databits in the file.
The source file was 4 clips from a Sanyo HD camera captured a 1920x1080 at 30P. The import was close to 8 minutes in HD and almost 4 in '08.
My question is, short of the editing functions that HD provides does the HD version compare with 08 in quality? I guess I am a little nitpicky about this even though HD seems so much faster. Maybe it is personal preference but I thought I would ask others what they thought about the two.
Thanks in advance.
--Mickey

I'm only guessing but in your particular case the difference may come from how each app treat 'still camera movies'.
I'm assuming Sanyo's HD clips are from Xacti HD1000, and although it is more like a camcorder than a still cam it does not fall into traditional camcorder category. Camcorders usually generate certain closed file types - DV, HDV, AVCHD and iMovie 08 either import them natively (DV) or convert to AIC movies (HDV,AVCHD). But when it comes to h264 or mpeg4 movies out of other cameras iPhoto store them as still cam movie and iMovie does not perform any conversion on them. Sanyo's h264 mp4 files are still considered this 'still cam movie' even at 1920x1080 res, and iMovie08 has difficulty performing in all realtime.
iMovieHD, on the other hand, converts everything to work with the project type. It does not support multi format / multi resolution mix up like iMovie08, and if you choose 1080i or 720p project setting it converts all source movies to AIC codec unless your source movie happens to match the target format. Thus file size becomes much larger but lighter on CPU to perform editing function.
As for 720p export, the file size difference is probably from the export setting if both movies are identical in length. Perhaps iMovie 08 uses a bit higher bitrate. Better quality attributes to higher bitrate, and also to the fact that iMovie08 did only one conversion (h264 -> 720p AIC) where as iMovieHD did it twice (h264->1080i AIC -> 720p), thus more generation loss in quality.
Personally I think iMovie should treat HD res h264 like the ones out of camcorder and convert them to AIC to maintain realtime operation, which is why it converts AVCHD - another HD res h264 movies - to AIC.

How does Mac Pro compare to iMac?

Ok I'm Pisssed!
I just bought a mac pro with AMD FirePro D700 6144 MB to photo editing. I noticed that it's a bit sluggish with my 4k Dell monitor. I figured what I can do I already have the best mac there is guess I'll have to live with it.
And then BAM, the new iMac comes out with AMD Radeon R9 M295X. Will it perform better with photo editing?

Actually you are wrong.
You can change CPU in mac pro, but you cannot fit inside anything better or newer as you are limited to specific TDP and chipset. For instance, putting in new generation of xeon won't give you TB3 support and so on. It can also lead to instability of the system overall. So in basic words: you shouldn't change CPU you already have inside so no CPU upgrade there as well.
Also iMac is much better in single core performance than mac pro and 99% of applications don't use more than 2 cores and even if they do those actions are not so critical (rendering where you can wait or go get one coffee meantime,...) compared to for instance 3D modelling or animation, where you need smooth rendering and good CPU real-time computation.
Also new radeon R9 M290X and M295X is much better supported from AMD side and also in windows. We all know OS X 3D performance is miserable compared to windows and having one year old drivers for mac pro GPU's (13.25 version) compared to newest radeon drivers (14.9).
In addition to all, 4K monitors are very poorly supported on mac pro. For example sometimes when I start OS X half of the screen remains black on my dell UP2414Q and only solution is to restart my computer again. Dell says that they haven't tested with apple hardware and it should be apple to fix this while apple says dell should fix it while customers remain in the dark and with poor support. Thank you dell and apple.
And there is more bad news for apple: adobe has started to shift their support to nvidia and windows system as Illustrator CC2014.2 now supports hardware accelerated graphics rendering with nvidia GPU on windows! And even more, new GTX980 beats any AMD cards on the market and AMD probably won't make anything better because they can't. I never understood apple latest fascination with AMD. AMD is the worst company for GPU's and their support is so bad I'm considering selling my mac pro.
The release of new iMac with 5K was a big slap in the face of professional apple customers who paid big money for their pro machine which can only run final cut pro X in it's full power. Any other software is unable to utilize all that "power" that apple put into mac pro. It's a big shame and a good waste of money to have just a nice room warmer.
Instead of fixing old things apple went and made new version of consumer class PC that is better or at least equivalent to pro class PC's the sell.
What apple need to fix is:
-10-bit support for displays. I don't know why we throw so much money on good displays when computer only outputs 8bit at the end.
-drop AMD and pick up nvidia cards. Apple already supports openCL 1.2 with nvidia cards under OS X and nvidia offers physX and CUDA in addition to only openCL that AMD offers. Also nvidia drivers are much more stable and performance of nvidia cards is better in all aspects.
-give more support to developers like adobe and others to upgrade their software to take advantage of GPU's we throw so much money on. What good is it to have a good computer and then software that can't even use that computer in it full potential except only few operations while majority of operations are still slow and laggy.
-give better support for 3D under OS X. Right now I'm watching like 9-30 FPS in Maya and Unity, and sometimes I even run some games to free my mind. WoW hardly reaches 60FPS on low settings while under windows bootcamp on same hardware I can get easily 60FPS! OS X still only has openGL 4.1, while we have there 4.3 and 4.4 GPU's out.
There has been almost one year since the release of this mac pro and nothing pretty much changed. This "pro" computer is actually pretty slow compared to what competition offers and the only good thing on mac is now the friendliness of OS X, stability and good integration with everything which windows lacks. But overall it's a very slow system to work on. Apple promised much but we got nothing of it except high price tag and a lot of lost nerves!
I'm very very disappointed in apple right now and really considering switching back to normal PC where at least I get latest drivers for everything and things at least runs at normal frame rate I can work with.
And don't even let me start on new Yosemite "flat" look which they obviously copied from windows and it is ugly as ****. Instead of changing icons they should fix old mac problems and give us professionals more to work with. In reality we get slapped and pushed on the edge. Don't try and make professional multimedia computer if you can't support it!

BWD to BWP version compare

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for