Bypassing specific traffic on Guest SSID

Hey guys,
I have a guest access setup with WISM and Anchor controllers in DMZ for internet access. L2 security policy is based on WAP2+PSK awith Layer3 on web authentication. Would it be possible to let un-authenticated users to connect to some web sites say Cisco.com (That is without being authenticated by WLC).
Thanks in advance,
Jay

Sure, that is what the preauthentication ACL is for. Just create an ACL on the WLC and under the WLAN select that ACL for the preauth ACL on the layer-3 security tab. Anything that is permitted by the ACL will be allowed to pass through the controller regardless if the client has authenticated yet or not.

Similar Messages

CSS Bypassing farm traffic based on matching HTTP header

Hi,
I am trying to find out whether the CSS is able to bypass specific traffic.
I have an existing content to match all HTTP and send to a farm. However, there are some HTTP flows i dont want to goto the farm, i just want CSS to route them onward to the destination. These specific HTTP packets are differentiated by the host field in the header. What config is needed to allow these host annotated packets to bypass the serverfarm?
Thanks
Alan

Hi Gilles,
Thanks for your response. The only thing you may have misread is that i need to select the host header field, as the URL's may not have host part in them, ie. raw http, not proxied. I guess then i need a header match rule linked to the new content, instead of the URL filter you mentioned.
BR
Alan

Best place to create the DHCP scope for Guest SSID for remote office connected to HQ Foreign-Anchor controller

Hi Experts ,
Need help with the respect to understand the best practice to place/create the DHCP scope for remote site Guest SSID which will be connected to HQ Foeign-Anchor controller set-up.
how about internet traffic for Guest SSID , which one will be recommanded :
1) Guest SSID gets authenticated from HQ ISE and exposed to the local internet
2) Guest SSID gets authenticated from HQ ISE and exposed to the HQ internet
Thanks

Hi George ,
Thanks for your reply ...So you mean, best design would be to create the DHCP scope into DMZ for guest and let it get exposed to HQ internet ...
how about if I have another anchor controller in lets say in other office and I need to anchor the traffic or load balance from HQ foreign controller , in that case if I create DHCP scope into HQ anchor controller and if its down , I will loose the connectivity , how do I achieve fail-over to another anchor ?
Do I need to create secondary scope into another anchor controller and let the client get reauthenticated from other location ISE and get ip address as well from another anchor controller . Is it what you are proposing ?

Clients not receiving DHCP IP address from HREAP centrally Switched Guest SSID

Hi All,
I am facing a problem in a newly deployed branch site where the Clients are not receiving DHCP IP address from a centrally switched Guest SSID. I see the client status is associated but the policy manager state is in DHCP_REQD.
The dhcp pool is configured on the controller itself. The local guest clients are able to get DHCP and all works fine, the issue is only with the clients in the remote site. The Hreap APs are in connected mode. Could you please suggest what could be the problem. Below is the out of the debug client.
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Adding mobile on LWAPP AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00(1)
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Reassociation received from mobile on AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing ACL 'Guest-ACL' (ACL ID 0) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:1393)
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Applying site-specific IPv6 override for station 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 - vapId 17, site 'APG-MONZA', interface 'vlan_81'
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:1393)
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Applying IPv6 Interface Policy for station 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 - vlan 81, interface id 13, interface 'vlan_81'
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Applying site-specific override for station 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 - vapId 17, site 'APG-MONZA', interface 'vlan_81'
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 START (0) Changing ACL 'none' (ACL ID 255) ===> 'none' (ACL ID 255) --- (caller apf_policy.c:1393)
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 STA - rates (8): 140 18 152 36 176 72 96 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 START (0) Initializing policy
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 START (0) Change state to AUTHCHECK (2) last state AUTHCHECK (2)
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 AUTHCHECK (2) Change state to L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) last state L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4)
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) Plumbed mobile LWAPP rule on AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00 vapId 17 apVapId 1
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 L2AUTHCOMPLETE (4) Change state to DHCP_REQD (7) last state DHCP_REQD (7)
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.372: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 apfMsAssoStateInc
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 apfPemAddUser2 (apf_policy.c:222) Changing state for mobile 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 on AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00 from Idle to Associated
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 49) in 28800 seconds
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Sending Assoc Response to station on BSSID 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00 (status 0) ApVapId 1 Slot 1
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 apfProcessAssocReq (apf_80211.c:4672) Changing state for mobile 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 on AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00 from Associated to Associated
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) State Update from Mobility-Incomplete to Mobility-Complete, mobility role=Local, client state=APF_MS_STATE_ASSOCIATED
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) pemAdvanceState2 4183, Adding TMP rule
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 11:35:53.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Adding Fast Path rule
type = Airespace AP - Learn IP address
on AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00, slot 1, interface = 13, QOS = 3
ACL Id = 255, Jumbo F
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Fast Path rule (contd...) 802.1P = 0, DSCP = 0, TokenID = 7006 IPv6 Vlan = 81, IPv6 intf id = 13
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Successfully plumbed mobile rule (ACL ID 255)
*pemReceiveTask: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 Added NPU entry of type 9, dtlFlags 0x0
*pemReceiveTask: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Sent an XID frame
*apfMsConnTask_3: May 24 13:26:49.401: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Updating AID for REAP AP Client 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00 - AID ===> 1
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:28:49.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) DHCP Policy timeout
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:28:49.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Pem timed out, Try to delete client in 10 secs.
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:28:49.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 12) in 10 seconds
*osapiBsnTimer: May 24 13:28:59.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 apfMsExpireCallback (apf_ms.c:599) Expiring Mobile!
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:28:59.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 apfMsExpireMobileStation (apf_ms.c:4897) Changing state for mobile 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 on AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00 from Associated to Disassociated
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:28:59.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Scheduling deletion of Mobile Station: (callerId: 45) in 10 seconds
*osapiBsnTimer: May 24 13:29:09.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 apfMsExpireCallback (apf_ms.c:599) Expiring Mobile!
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:29:09.316: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Sent Deauthenticate to mobile on BSSID 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00 slot 1(caller apf_ms.c:4981)
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:29:09.316: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 apfMsAssoStateDec
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:29:09.316: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 apfMsExpireMobileStation (apf_ms.c:5018) Changing state for mobile 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 on AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00 from Disassociated to Idle
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:29:09.316: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Deleted mobile LWAPP rule on AP [3c:ce:73:6d:37:00]
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:29:09.316: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 Deleting mobile on AP 3c:ce:73:6d:37:00(1)
*pemReceiveTask: May 24 13:29:09.317: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 Removed NPU entry.

#does the client at the remote site roams between AP that connects to different WLC?
#type 9 is not good.
*pemReceiveTask: May 24 13:26:49.373: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 Added NPU entry of type 9, dtlFlags 0x0
#Does your dhcp server getting hits.
#Also, get debug dhcp message & packet.
#Dhcp server is not responding.
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:28:49.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) DHCP Policy timeout
*apfReceiveTask: May 24 13:28:49.315: 10:40:f3:91:7e:24 0.0.0.0 DHCP_REQD (7) Pem timed out, Try to delete client in 10 secs.

3850 WLC - 5760 Anchor: Multiple Guest SSIDs issue

Hi,
I have configured a 3850 Foreign WLC and a 5760 as anchor WLC in a DMZ behind an ASA FW. The Anchor Controller is configured to advertise 3 GUEST Wireless:
(INSIDE) ---- ASA FW (guest in interface) -------------------------- (Te1/0/1) 5760 ANCHOR (Te1/0/2) -------------------- L3 Link-------------------- (guest out interface) ASA FW ---- (OUTSIDE)
GUEST1: 10.9.65.0/24 – VLAN 11
GUEST2: 10.9.66.0/24 – VLAN 12
GUEST3: 10.9.67.0/24 – VLAN 13
Management VLAN 1: 10.8.252.1 (Anchor Management VLAN – Mobility)
The link between the WLC and the Guest OUT Interface on the ASA Firewall is a L3 Link, NOT a Trunk.
The 5760 WLC is also a DHCP server for the three client VLANs above. I have also configured 3 SVIs as default gateways for these VLANs:
Interface vlan 11 – 10.9.65.1
Interface vlan 12 – 10.9.66.1
Interface vlan 13 – 10.9.67.1
wgh-anchorwlc5760-primary#show ip interface brief
Interface              IP-Address      OK? Method Status                Protocol
Vlan1                  10.8.252.1      YES NVRAM up                    up
Vlan11                 10.9.65.1       YES manual up                    up
Vlan12                 10.9.66.1       YES manual up                    up
Vlan13                 10.9.67.1       YES manual up                    up
GigabitEthernet0/0     10.8.252.85     YES NVRAM down                  down
Te1/0/1                unassigned      YES unset up                    up
Te1/0/2                10.8.253.1      YES NVRAM up                    up
Capwap0                unassigned      YES unset up                    up
If a client connects to GUEST1 SSID it gets an IP address in VLAN 11 and its default gateway is 10.9.65.1.
If a client connects to GUEST2 SSID it gets an IP address in VLAN 12 and its default gateway is 10.9.66.1.
If a client connects to GUEST3 SSID it gets an IP address in VLAN 13 and its default gateway is 10.9.67.1.
Mobility is UP and I can see clients connected to the Anchor WLC either in IPLEARN or WEBAUTH_PEND state. DHCP is working fine, clients get an IP and the right default gateway and DNS servers when connect, for example, to GUEST1.
anchorwlc5760-primary#show wireless client summary
Number of Local Clients : 3
MAC Address    AP Name                          WLAN State              Protocol
04f7.e482.b21c N/A                              2    IPLEARN            Mobile
bc3e.6d32.17f6 N/A                              2    IPLEARN            Mobile
a826.d5b3.5ae8 N/A                              2    WEBAUTH_PEND       Mobile
However, they are not able to ping the default gateway – SVI VLAN 11: 10.9.65.1, so I can not see any traffic leaving the Anchor WLC to continue with the Web Authentication Process (cwa) using ISE. I can see that the authorization policy (“unkown” and the URL to ISE) has been pushed to the clients but I am not redirected to ISE Web Authentication Portal when I open my web browser. I have done some captures on the FW interfaces but I cannot see any traffic coming from the clients.
I know that usually there is a Trunk (that allows client VLANs) between a WLC and L3 Switch when you configure multiples SSIDs and then configure the SVIs on the L3 Switch. However, I think this design with a L3 Link should work too because 5760 is a WLC+L3Switch.
My question is: Why clients are not able to ping their default gateway?
I hope it makes sense.
I appreciate any thoughts and help. Thanks in advance.
Joana.

Hi,
I couldn't get it working (I doubt if it is really possible). I had to add a switch between the 5760 Anchor Controller and the ASA Firewall:
(INSIDE) ---- ASA FW (guest in interface) -------------------------- (Te1/0/1) 5760 ANCHOR (Te1/0/2) -------------------- SWITCH-------------------- (guest out interface) ASA FW ---- (OUTSIDE)
The link between the 5760 and the Switch is configured as a Trunk and it allows the 3 Guest SSIDs (VLANs). The link between the Switch and the ASA FW is configured as a Layer 3 link. I also set up the default gateways for the 3 GUEST VLANs in the Switch (3 vlan interfaces) and the 5760 as DHCP Server.
I hope it helps.
Joana.

WLC user rate limit on guest ssid anchor controller

Hi,
I have been looking through the forums & some cisco documents but not found a good example similar to what I am seeking to do so now I am turning to the expertise of my peers.
We have been deploying 3502 APs remotely to locations with full T1s that backhaul to where I sit at HQ.
Both the foreign and anchor controller are here at my location.
I am seeking to rate limit per user the bandwidth each client will get on the guest internet ssid.
As you know this traffic is encapsulated in capwap between the AP and the controller so I cant use a standard ACL on the switch or router.
We are trying to keep the guest internet access usage in check on the T1 at any given site so the other ssid's & local lan traffic is not overly competing for the bandwidth.
I found the place to edit the default profiles in the controller but the documentation really isnt clear on best practices.
So I put it to you my fellow wireless engineers to suggest how you are implementing bandwidth management on your wireless guest internet.
Thanks guys!
Oh and here is my hardware & software levels.
5508wlc - forgeign
4402wlc - anchor
Software Version
7.0.230.0

Amjad,
Thank you for taking the time to respond as well as the document link.
It was pretty clear on the steps and what it would impact.
Two things that push me for a different solution (assuming their is one).
Note The values that you configure for the per-user bandwidth contracts affect only the amount of bandwidth going downstream (from the access point to the wireless client). They do not affect the bandwidth for upstream traffic (from the client to the access point).
As you can see from the above note taken out of the linked document the roll based rate limit doesnt really rate limit the T1 traffic any guest user consumes it only limits usage from the AP down to the client.
#1 I am looking for a solution that limits the users up & down streams (if possible) & also before it leaves the AP for the T1.
The idea is to limit WAN utilization.
#2 I read in the forums here others asking about the "user role" and saw some comments saying it is not considered "best practice" to use user roles.
Let me clarify that our guest ssid's are using the http webpage pass through for authentication and it is really only the tic mark to indicate they understand the terms and conditions of using our internet as a guest service. No actual user accounts are used on the guest ssid's.
***One last question about this and any other changes***
Will any change I make be on the "Foreign, Anchor" or both Controllers?

E4200 Guest SSID Login page fails

Config:
Netgear ProSafe Gigabit Router is my DHCP Server -- The entire home net work is on the same subnet (192.168.15.xxx)
Linksys E4200 configured as an access point ONLY -- wired connection -- static IP assigned -- DHCP server turned off
Linksys WRT610N configured as an access point ONLY -- wired connection -- static IP assigned -- DHCP server turned off
3 -- 5 port gigabit switches
1 -- 8 port gigabit switch
No more than two switches between any two wired devices
Both Linksys access points have the same SSID and WPA2 security phrase -- total of 4 radios
Nonoverlapping channels are selected on both the 2.4Ghz and 5.0Ghz radio to minimize interference
All computers are running Windows 7 Professional 64bit with all the latest updates
Two iPhones and one iPad also access the network
All LAN and WAN connectivity is working as designed
Problem:
guest SSID is turned on
password is established
All devices will connect to the guest SSID and the E4200 is assigning an ip address to the device in the 192.168.33.xxx range which is what it's supposed to do.
When I open a web browser, I am not automatically redirected to the Cisco Login Page. If I enter 192.168.33.1 as the URL, the login screen is presented. I enter the password I have created in the guest admin page on the wireless guest tab. I then see a blank page and a URL of 192.168.33.1/guestnetwork.asp. THIS IS WHERE I GET STUCK. THE ONLY WAY TO EVER SEE THE LOGIN PAGE AGAIN IS TO REBOOT THE E4200, otherwise you just get unable to connect messages when opening web browsers and the wireless status icon in the system tray shows a yellow exclamation mark.
I successfully connect to the guest SSID but I do not get access to the internet. When I type ipconfig, I see that the DNS is set to 192.168.33.1 which does not exist on my network. I assume there's some internal NAT magic that is supposed to happen in the E4200 to bridge me over to my 192.168.15.xxx network but it doesn't seem to be happening.
At the beginning of the call I specifically asked them if the E4200 must be the DHCP server in order for the guest SSID feature to work and they said no. 1.5 hours later they had no answers so they told me that it wasn't working because the E4200 was not the DHCP server. The documentation says nothing about a DHCP requirement for guest AP service. Linksys support further could not answer what you would do if you needed more than one AP with guest service enabled.
It seems like this is a firmware issue but it may be the guest SSID service requires the E4200 to also act as the DHCP server. Can anyone shed any light on whether this is a bug or if the router/AP is working as designed?
Thanks,
(Mod note: Edited for guideline compliance.)

Yes the E4200 must have DHCP turned on in order to pass out IP's to your Guest Network. No DHCP, no Guest Network.

Anchoring multiple Guest SSIDs to the same WLC

Hi All,
I've currently got a typical 'anchored' Guest WLAN solution where several WLCs tunnel guest traffic back to an isolated WLC for WebAuth - this all works fine using a mix of 5508 / 4400, all on v7.0.98.0 code.
The question is, can I add a second Guest SSID to the estate and anchor it back to the same Guest Anchor WLC that I'm already using?
I can't find anything to say it won't work and have found this that says it should, but none of this is very concrete... Does anybody know of any better references and/or have you done this in the wild?
https://supportforums.cisco.com/message/1276785
Cheers,
Richard

Hi,
yes it's totally ok.
On the foreign, just create a second WLAN and anchor it to the other WLC. On the anchor, create the same second WLAN that you anchor to itself ...
Nothing speciali in order to configure it.
Nicolas
===
Don't forget to rate answers that you find useful

NAC Guest Server and Multiple Guest SSID's/Splashpages

Hi All,
If I have multiple guest SSID's on a single controller and I use NGS as the Radius. How do I configure NGS to "send" the clients to differnet login pages corresponding to the SSID they came from.
I can configure different splash pages in HotSpots section but how do I map the different SSID's from the controller to the different splash pages. Then I guess that raises the question when I generate guest users on NGS is it possile to only allow them associate to a specific SSID.
TIA,
Eoin.

Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for the reply. I can see that config on the WLC and have used it before where there is only a single guest SSID. What I dont know is if the NAC Guest server sees radius requests coming from different guest SSID's on the same WLC. How does the NAC Guest server apply the correct guest policy to that user. And when sponsors genereate guest accounts how do they specific which policy is to be applied to that guest so it can only get access to a specfic guest network/SSID I'm not sure where the "mapping" of accounts/splash pages/policies takes place on the NAC guest server. I've only ever set up NAC Guest when there has been a single guest SSID.
Regards,
Eoin.

AIR-AP1142N-A-K9 configuration issue for guest ssid

I'm trying to get the guest ssid working. I was frustrated so saved my old config and wiped out everything on this AP. Now my bvi1 does not come online.
ap#sh ip int bri
Interface                  IP-Address      OK? Method Status                Protocol
BVI1                       192.168.2.249   YES NVRAM down                  down
Dot11Radio0                unassigned      YES NVRAM up                    up
Dot11Radio0.50             unassigned      YES unset up                    up
Dot11Radio0.51             unassigned      YES unset up                    up
Dot11Radio1                unassigned      YES NVRAM administratively down down
GigabitEthernet0           unassigned      YES NVRAM up                    up
GigabitEthernet0.50        unassigned      YES unset up                    up
GigabitEthernet0.51        unassigned      YES unset up                    up
ap#
ap#sh int bvi
*May 6 15:05:24.611: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station 847a.8835.4f22 Associated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]1
BVI1 is down, line protocol is down
Hardware is BVI, address is 003a.99eb.8d00 (bia b862.1fe9.9af0)
Internet address is 192.168.2.249/24
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 54000 Kbit, DLY 5000 usec,
     reliability 255/255, txload 1/255, rxload 1/255
Encapsulation ARPA, loopback not set
ARP type: ARPA, ARP Timeout 04:00:00
Last input never, output never, output hang never
Last clearing of "show interface" counters never
Input queue: 0/75/0/0 (size/max/drops/flushes); Total output drops: 0
5 minute input rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
5 minute output rate 0 bits/sec, 0 packets/sec
     0 packets input, 0 bytes, 0 no buffer
     Received 0 broadcasts, 0 runts, 0 giants, 0 throttles
     0 input errors, 0 CRC, 0 frame, 0 overrun, 0 ignored, 0 abort
     3 packets output, 180 bytes, 0 underruns
     0 output errors, 0 collisions, 0 interface resets
     0 unknown protocol drops
     0 output buffer failures, 0 output buffers swapped out
ap#
I have a private vlan 50 and the public vlan 51. The private ssid seems to work and allow connectivity to the internet but I don't understand with the same configuration the Public ssid doesn't seem to work.
I get this output when trying to connect with my cell phone.
*May 6 15:00:37.288: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 847a.8835.4f22 Reason: Sending station has left the BSS
*May 6 15:00:38.432: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station TYLOR-NB 9c4e.3617.483c Reassociated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
*May 6 15:00:42.935: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station 847a.8835.4f22 Associated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
*May 6 15:00:54.320: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station   2c44.01c3.70a6 Associated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
*May 6 15:01:13.913: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 847a.8835.4f22 Reason: Sending station has left the BSS
*May 6 15:01:17.281: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station 847a.8835.4f22 Associated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
*May 6 15:01:48.181: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 847a.8835.4f22 Reason: Sending station has left the BSS
*May 6 15:01:51.583: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station 847a.8835.4f22 Associated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
*May 6 15:02:22.500: %DOT11-6-DISASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Deauthenticating Station 847a.8835.4f22 Reason: Sending station has left the BSS
*May 6 15:03:41.852: %DOT11-6-ASSOC: Interface Dot11Radio0, Station 847a.8835.4f22 Associated KEY_MGMT[WPAv2 PSK]
SSID [PUBLIC] :
MAC Address    IP address      Device        Name            Parent         State
847a.8835.4f22 0.0.0.0         ccx-client    -               self           Assoc
ap#
ap#show run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 2746 bytes
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
hostname ap
enable secret 5 $1$4jEJ$ajpjBvSx3DUhxyvLADj.91
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default local
aaa authorization exec default local
aaa session-id common
dot11 syslog
dot11 ssid PRIVATE
   vlan 50
   authentication open
   authentication key-management wpa version 2
   mbssid guest-mode
   wpa-psk ascii 7 01150F035E050E0A2D
dot11 ssid PUBLIC
   vlan 51
   authentication open
   authentication key-management wpa version 2
   mbssid guest-mode
   wpa-psk ascii 7 045D02010A2F444B05
username Admin privilege 15 password 7 0526071D3545175840
bridge irb
interface Dot11Radio0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
encryption vlan 50 mode ciphers aes-ccm
encryption vlan 51 mode ciphers aes-ccm
encryption mode ciphers aes-ccm tkip
ssid PRIVATE
ssid PUBLIC
antenna gain 0
mbssid
station-role root
interface Dot11Radio0.50
encapsulation dot1Q 50 native
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 50
bridge-group 50 subscriber-loop-control
bridge-group 50 block-unknown-source
no bridge-group 50 source-learning
no bridge-group 50 unicast-flooding
bridge-group 50 spanning-disabled
interface Dot11Radio0.51
encapsulation dot1Q 51
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 51
bridge-group 51 subscriber-loop-control
bridge-group 51 block-unknown-source
no bridge-group 51 source-learning
no bridge-group 51 unicast-flooding
bridge-group 51 spanning-disabled
interface Dot11Radio1
no ip address
no ip route-cache
shutdown
antenna gain 0
dfs band 3 block
channel dfs
station-role root
bridge-group 1
bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
no bridge-group 1 source-learning
no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
interface GigabitEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
duplex auto
speed auto
no keepalive
interface GigabitEthernet0.50
encapsulation dot1Q 50 native
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 50
no bridge-group 50 source-learning
bridge-group 50 spanning-disabled
interface GigabitEthernet0.51
encapsulation dot1Q 51
no ip route-cache
bridge-group 51
no bridge-group 51 source-learning
bridge-group 51 spanning-disabled
interface BVI1
ip address 192.168.2.249 255.255.255.0
no ip route-cache
ip default-gateway 192.168.2.1
ip http server
ip http authentication aaa
no ip http secure-server
ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
bridge 1 route ip
line con 0
line vty 0 4
end
switch config:
interface FastEthernet1/0/46
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 50
switchport trunk allowed vlan 50,51
switchport mode trunk

Hi
I know the bridge-group have to be identical to the sub interface number and vlan number
This is true for all other vlans except for native vlan. For native vlan sub-interfaces bridge group number always should be 1. In your case, if vlan 50 is the native vlan (192.168.2.x/24 belong vlan) then configure bridge-group 1 under those .50 sub-interfaces. Then everything should work :)
It is ideal if you could put AP management (BVI IP) into separate vlan & two user groups put vlan 50 & 51. Here is a sample configuration where vlan 110 is Mgmt & vlan 12,13 for user vlans.
http://mrncciew.com/2012/10/24/multiple-ssid-config-on-autonomous-ap/
HTH
Rasika
**** Pls rate all useful responses ****

BT is blocking specific traffic - Connection probl...

I started having this problem about two weeks ago, after multiple phonecalls to BT and a couple of emails nothing has been done, so hopefully someone on the forum can help.
The problem is the BT server that my hub connects to runs software to block specific traffic, I assume this is handy for restricted torrents or illegal downloads. But what it's blocking is a game called EVE Online, I used to play this game without a single problem until about two weeks ago. I logged in one day and the lag was unbearable, mainly due to the fact BT is blocking around 90% of packets that are sent to me. As I said, I used to be able to play no problem, but now I can't even go on for 2 minutes before I get kicked.
I've confirmed with the EVE support team that BT is causing the problem, EVE uses UDP and it only requires a packet loss of 5 consecutive packets before the game disconnects you. This may not seem like a lot, but due to the nature of it, any more than 5 packets can cause major problems in the game, so they just disconnect you. A friend of mine also had this problem, but to a lesser extent, but it did span accross multiple games, he has since then switched to another broadband provider which I will not name, and hasn't had the issue since. In EVE, recently BT have been known to block traffic, I'm not the first to ask EVE support for assistance on the matter, so they weren't strangers to the problem.
I've ran a program called Ping Plotter to the EVE server, for those of you unaware Ping Plotter is a useful tool to (as the name suggests) Plot the latency (ping) of your connection to the server. PP also records packet loss and the exact route the client is using to connect to the server. The results average about 90% packet loss, Below are the results of PP.
500 trace count, 1 second per trace.
Packet loss is highlighted in RED
BT IP's are highlighted in BLUE
EVE IP's are highlighted in GREEN
Target Name: srv200-g.ccp.cc
IP: 87.237.38.200
Date/Time: 21/01/2014 2:41:46 AM to 21/01/2014 2:50:12 AM
Hop Sent Error    PL% Min Max Avg Host Name / [IP]
1   500     0     0.0     1   34 2 BThomehub.home [192.168.1.254]  PC TO HUB
2   500    423    84.6    9   57   21 esr19.edinburgh8.broadband.bt.net [213.1.130.142] HUB TO BT
3   500    474    94.8   10 149 26 [213.1.130.125]
4   500   480   96.0 18   66 29 [213.1.69.74]
5   500    481    96.2 19   63 31 [31.55.165.77]
6   500    476   95.2 19   71 35 [31.55.165.107]
7    14    11     78.6   18   53 29 acc1-10GigE-4-1-3.mr.21cn-ipp.bt.net [109.159.250.114]
8   133   126   94.7 29   62 47 core2-te0-13-0-14.ilford.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.250.46]
9   262   238   90.8 27 69   47 peer3-te0-1-0-7.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net [109.159.254.251]
10  500   443   88.6 25   74 40 ccpgames.com [195.66.226.23]
11  500    465   93.0 25   69 42 te-d2-e2.ccp.cc [87.237.37.246]
12  500   422    84.4 25 77 38 srv200-g.ccp.cc [87.237.38.200]
As you can see, that is completely unacceptable. The connection between my PC to my HUB is perfect, from the HUB to BT is where things go pearshaped.
Onto another note, the three times I've phoned, I've spoken to someone reading from a card. What I mean by that is they haven't got a clue what they're speaking about. They are denying there is a problem because 'ping google' works fine. the first time I was redirected to the tech support, but then found out I wasn't paying for the service so I couldn't use it. The second time the advisor hung up on me when I requested to speak to her supervisor, and the third I hung up because the advisor claimed BT broadband isn't designed to support online gaming, and he said a 90% packet loss is to be expected when online gaming, alright then.
Any help whatsoever on this issue is greatly appreciated, If I've missed anything out just ask for it and i'll post it
Thanks.

What home hub model do you have and have you tried rebooting it? Lots of UDP traffic can be difficult for some routers to handle due to inbuilt firewall, an older router or possibly a router thats starting to have problems might cause issues(Dust blocking airflow slowing the processor down) like this due to load on the processor of the router(These things normally have very slow processors). Have you tried running extended ping tests ? I'd try ping -n 1000 www.google.co.uk and ping -n 1000 www.bbc.co.uk additionally try using ping -l 750 -n 1000 www.google.co.uk and ping -l 750 -n 1000 www.bbc.co.uk , What package are you on are you sure you're not on a package with traffic shaping? If the devices BT use to shape traffic dont understand what eve is it might assume its P2P related and throttle it? A glasnost test should help there. But the package you are on should be Totally unlimited rather than just unlimited and was introduced from sometime around Feb last year I believe. If you are on an older contract you are probably being traffic shaped. Additionally its best to concentrate on Packet loss to servers rather than to routers. Backbone routers are often setup to depriorize icmp traffic directed to their own addresses except from servers used to manage them, concentrating on packet loss to intermediate devices is often a red herring.
There are various utilities out there that can test a tcp or UDP in a similar sort of way to ping, however the remote servers if they are protected by firewalls and IDP systems might detect that as an anomoly and block it as a possible attack.

WAP321 - Guest SSID not working

                   I have a WAP321 with 2 SSID's. One is for local access and another for guest. The WAP connects to a 3550 and it's port is set to
description Cisco Wireless
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,20
switchport mode trunk
no ip address
spanning-tree portfast
     My ASA 5505 is set with both VLANs and I'm using DHCP to dishout the guest IP. MyWAP has both networks setup. VAP 0 is setup for VLAN 1 and VAP 1 is for VLAN 20. Both are enabled.
When connecting to my local wireless, I have no problem getting local access and Internet connection. When I connect to Guest I get an IP from my ASA's DHCP, but I cannot ping my gateway, which is my ASA. I know my guest VLAN is ok, because if I put a port on that VLAN, I can connect to the Internet.
When I do packet captures from the WAP (Administration-Packet Capture), I can't see any ICMP attempts either from the eth0 or VAP 1. When I capture my machines wireless interface I see ICMP attempts with no reposnds. It makes me think I missed something in the WAP321 setup.
Any ideas where to check?

Hi, My name is Eric Moyers. I am a Network Support Engineer in the Cisco Small Business Support Center. Thank you for using the Cisco Community Post Forums.
While what I am fixing to share is not in any way a great solution, It can be utilized as a workaround.
With the WAP321, after trying a few different scenarios that didn’t work. I simply created two vlans, left the Untagged vlan as main vlan and changed the Management vlan to the second. I then attached the guest SSID to the Management VLAN. This allowed me to authenticate to my guest captive portal and get an IP and get out to the internet. The Main SSID still worked normally.
Now for some caveats:
Problem: If a wireless client knows the IP of the WAP and the username and password they could get into the WAP.
Solution: Setup Management Access Control to an IP outside the DHCP scope for that VLAN and have a Strong Password.
Problem: Management of the WAP321 can only be from an IP on the Management VLAN. (In my case 2)
Solution: Setup Management Access Control to an IP outside the DHCP scope for that VLAN and have a Strong Password.
Not the very best solution, but the only workaround I can come up with for now.
Thanks
Eric Moyers    .:|:.:|:.
Cisco Small Business US STAC Advanced Support Engineer
Wireless Subject Matter Expert
CCNA, CCNA-Wireless
866-606-1866
Mon - Fri 09:30 - 18:30 (UTC - 05:00)
*Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

Guest ssid with anchor controller and Web policy

We have a WLC4404 and and anchor controller WLC4402 to provide guest access to the wifi net. We configured both in the same mobility group, and the guest ssid to attach to the mobility anchor 4402. All is working fine until we enable the web policy authentication on the 4402. In this case the client join the guest ssid but neither get an ip address from the dhcp server nor go anywhere. Is we disable the web authentication all works fine again. We are runnig 4.0.206.0 on both WLC. Anyone can help us?

Two things you might check. (1) The 4404's mobility anchor should point to the 4402, and the 4402 should anchor to itself. (2) Make sure you are configuring the same security policy for the SSID on both the 4402 and 4404. So if the SSID is "guest" and you turn on web authentication on the 4402, make sure "guest" is on the 4404 with web authentication. We are using a similar setup for guest access at several sites.

Rate limit guest ssid 5500 foreign to 2504 anchor

Hi
We have a need to limit bandwidth on guest ssid that is tunnelled to anchor controller. The 2504 doesn't have rate limiting options but the 5500 does. If we enabled the rate limit on the SSID details on the foreign would it work (seeing as though the anchor can't have same settings). I would have thought that the access points terminate on the foreign therefore the rate limit would apply there.
Would this work or do I need another 5500 as the anchor so that rate limits can match on the SSID?

Thanks. It would be nice if Cisco documentation actually clarified this as all guest anchor docs seem not to mention having to have both controllers supporting QoS profiles.

Web-redirect to external radius not wokring on some browsers for Guest SSID

Hi,
We are using Cisco 5760 with 3.7, and the guest SSID doesn't perform web-redirect to external radius (cisco NAC appliance), for some browsers. Although the same works on Cisco 5508 and 4402 WLC with the same NAC appliance for all browsers.
working browsers: IE9.0 and IE 11.0
Non-working: Chrome all versions, Firefox all versions, Safari all versions.
Can anyone provide some help if they have seen this issue before.?

You need to check the compatibility guide of Cisco WLC and check if those browsers are supported or not.

Bypassing specific traffic on Guest SSID

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for