C;\Windows default share session increased for the same user

in win 2k8 server I seem some strange things, that for the same user, shared folder sessions are increasing. Support is appreciated
Regards Prabhu

It might be connecting from multiple devices.
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile

Similar Messages

Multiple sessions for the same user

Hi,
The scenario is like this. The user is logged into the system using JAAS and
has a session object created. I want to create a new session for the same user
with the already available credentials. This is to provide the same user the access
to the application in another window with different session object. How can do
that in Weblogic 8.1 server ?
thanks in advance,
Krishna.

Hi
I think it would be easier to enable session time out settings using GPO considering you work in a domain environment..
Having session timeouts settings you could say... hey after 15 min of inactivity disconnect the user and then after 15 min of disconnected session log him off
Take a look at this URL: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc754272.aspx
Hope this helps
Best regards
Joaquin Camarero Muñoz

Imp: new session for the same user if idle for 4 mins. or else throw error

Dear All,
I have a requirement where for security reasons if a session remains idle for 4 mins. or more, it should redirect to login page. This is easy as there is a feature in apex itself under security in application properties. This works fine.
But I also don't want the users to start two active parallel sessions for the same user, and allow user to login only if the session for the user is idle for 4mins. or more or else display error message that the user has already logged.
A second in sequence, on submit process for this in page 101 when login button is hit is written for this. It is as follows:
declare
found boolean := false;
begin
for x in (SELECT a.apex_user from apex_workspace_activity_log a,apex_workspace_sessions b, (SELECT max(view_date) as maxdate FROM apex_workspace_activity_log where upper(apex_user)=upper(:P101_USERNAME) and APPLICATION_ID=120) maxresults, (SELECT max(session_created) as maxcreate FROM apex_workspace_sessions where upper(user_name)=upper(:P101_USERNAME)) maxsession where b.session_created=maxsession.maxcreate AND b.APEX_SESSION_ID!=:SESSION and upper(b.user_name)=upper(:P101_USERNAME) and b.APEX_SESSION_ID=a.APEX_SESSION_ID and a.seconds_ago<240 AND a.APPLICATION_ID=120 and a.view_date=maxresults.maxdate and rownum=1) loop
found:=true;
raise_application_error(-20000, 'Already Logged.');
exit;
end loop;
IF not found THEN
null;
END IF;
end;
But for some this reason this does not work as intended. Two users can login parallely.
When I trace the program, I see that it should catch the parallel user login. But it does not.
Is it some db cache issue? I don't know.
Kindly let me know how to fix this. It is crucial for us to achieve this.
Thanking in advance.
Regards,
Deepika.

Dear Fateh,
Thanks for the reply.
The features of this plugin are:
Configurable timeout actions including alert, redirect, and logout
Optional and configurable warning message
Option to keep session alive if user isn’t truly idle. Special thanks to Martin D’Souza for a great idea on how to implement this feature.
But it cannot stop a new session for a user, if there is an active (in my definition apex_workspace_activity_log.seconds_ago<240) session already running for that user.
Regards,
Deepika.

What's the easiest way to switch the license to a new computer for the same user?

What's the easiest way to switch the license to a new computer for the same user?

Cloud License allows 2 activations http://www.adobe.com/legal/licenses-terms.html
-Install on a 2nd computer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1452292?tstart=0
-Windows or Mac does not matter... 2 on the same operating system, or 1 on each

Auth: Restrict Infoobject for Queries differently for the same user

Hi guys,
I need to restrict an infoobject differently for some queries (analysis authorization). For example, I need to give full hierarchie access for query 1 to user 1. But for another query for the same user I need to restrict the hierarchie authorization. Furthermore, both queries are based on the same multi provider. It is not possible to use different multi provider ... the adjustment effort is to high (to many queries).
I have set up an authorization with rsecadmin
QUERY1:
ZHier1     Hyrarchie 1
ZHier2     Hyrarchie 2
0TCAACTVT     Activity in Analysis Authorizations
0TCAIPROV     Authorizations for InfoProvider
0TCAVALID     Validity of an Authorization
0TCTQUERY     Query
-->I added the respective values for the queries, the used multiprovider, hierarchies, etc.
I have set up the same for QUERY 2 with different Hierarchy and Query values, but it does not work correctly. The user is always authorized for the hierarchie values of both queries.
Thanks foryour helpin advance!!
Regards,
Sven

Hi Sankar,
Sorry for the confusion. Lets focus only one hierarchy ... ZHier1.
QUERY1:
ZHier1     -> value: node2
0TCAACTVT     -> value: 2 & 3
0TCAIPROV -> value: multiprovider1
0TCAVALID     -> value: *
0TCTQUERY     -> value: query1 (based on multiprovider1)
QUERY2:
ZHier1     -> value: node2.1 (sub node of node 2)
0TCAACTVT     -> value: 2 & 3
0TCAIPROV -> value: multiprovider1
0TCAVALID     -> value: *
0TCTQUERY     -> value: query2 (based on multiprovider1)
But this does not work. When I use query2 in reports the user has access to node2 and not only to node2.1.
Any idea?
Thanks again!
Sven

Multiple instances of the same BSP app for the same user

Hi,
I currently have a BSP application which has a main page which consists of three frames. Each of the frames within the page is linked to its own controller, with one other controller controlling the whole page.
due to the nature of the program i need to access information from one controller in another. To do this I create a reference to the controller whose data I want within the controller that needs access to it. This works fine under normal processing, however when the application is executed / called up twice by the same user, the controllers for the initial instance of the application are de-referenced...
Does anybody know why this may be occurring...and how to get around it?
Thanks
Mike Law.

Whenever you open a browser anew, then there is no session data that the browser can send in any way whatsoever, therefor a new session on the server is started.
If you open a new window from within the first session this might not be the case, you can run multiple windows in the same session.
Either way, I would recommend to search the forum, there have been discussion about this (or a similar) topic, e.g. accessing the same model instance - it would be best if you look for them, read them, and if you have any questions left come back for more
Cheers,
Max

WebTools Creating multiple users for the same User

I had to make a few changes to a BP in SAP which will synch back into WebTools but now I am getting multiple users for the same contact. For example my user is cspehar_1 now in Webtools there are cspehar_1, cspehar_2, cspehar_3 and so on up to _8.
This is occuring for several users in webtools.
What causes this and how do I fix it?
Thanks,
Craig Spehar

Hi Craig,
There are two ways to cause this that I am aware of:
1. Change the "Business Partner Synch Contacts Field" setting after the initial synch.
2. Change the Web UserID on the BP contact in B1 (OCPR.U_PRX_SID).
After that, update the user in WT and synch. (might also happen if you update the BP in B1)
Since the synch is using the OCPR.U_PRX_SID to identify the contact, it will not be able to find it in B1 if the U_PRX_SID has changed. When it does not find it, it assumes it needs to be created. This results in a duplicate.
The solution is to reset the U_PRX_SID back to what it was or set the synch contact field back to what it was.
Then delete the last created duplicate contact from B1.
There may be further data corruption issues here. If orders/quotes/opportunities or other dependant data has synchronized referencing the duplicate user, these data will need to be correct as well.
FYI, whatever caused this was probably at the root of your order problem as well.

Multiple layouts for the same user in the same portal

Hello.
I have a challenge.
Currently there is a portal (6.40) running as a frontend for an application. So the portal is used for only this purpose. The content is a changed masthead and a number of WebDynpros and UWL's all accessing the same backend.
Now there is a wish to use the same portal to execute a transaction iView for the same backend. Simple. BUT when a user uses the portal for the product he/she shall not see the transaction iView and also when the user sees the transaction iView, the WDs and UWL's should not be shown in the navigation. And also the masthead should be different on the two views.
Putting in another portal is not anoption, this should be done on the same portal. The way I expect it to work is by accessing the same portal og two different URL's.
Companies cannot be used since some of the users should be able to access poth views.
I know that in a prefect world it would simply be a matter of creating two different roles and assign them as needed and if the user has both roles hen they would both be available in the navigation. But to the user the portal should look like different portals.
Any suggestions on how to achieve this functionality?
Br,
Thomas Mouritsen

Hi Thomas,
you have several options with the portal standard:
1.) If the user only has one role assigned at a time you can attach the portal layout to the roles. So depending on the role the user has he sees the respective layout - BUT: how to asign the two roles to the user!? This can only be done by admins and I assume that it is no intended to call the admins every time the user needs the other role?
2.) The entry to the portal is realized with different urls like http://yourportal.com/VIEW1 and http://yourportal.com/VIEW2.
VIEW1 and VIEW2 are so called portal aliases and you can attach the different layouts to those aliases.
BUT: the two roles have nothing to do with the aliases so you still have the problem of role assignment.
3.) Each person gets two users with each user assigned to one role and one layout assigned to the user or group or role...
Anyhow: I would ask the people who brought up the idea of two different layouts - WHY?? A portal is ONE single point of entry for EVERY application and information a user needs. So why two different layouts? And what, if five others are coming each bringing their own layouts, too?
4.) If you really want to have different layouts each time a different top-level navigation point is active you have to program your own portal component. That would fit your needs but is besides standard.
Hth,
Michael

How to avoid one active session for the same user account concurrently

Hi all ,
i am using model 1 architecture in my application.
in my application ,if one user login through 2 browser at a time ,he can do it.
But now ,i want to close first browser or redirect him to a exception page.
plz guide me how can i do it.
plz include case1.
what happen if he close page ,not logoff
case2
what happen if power cut happen on client side.

+You can use a column in the table to check the current user logged in status. Once the user gets logged in the application change the flag at the backend. In this way you can know whether the user is already logged in the apllication or not, and based on this you can show a proper message to the user.+
+If the user closes the browser window without logging off the application, then in this case you can use the session Listoners.+
Well not the right approach Listeners would it for you.For browser closure problem.If user does that automatically container destroys the session object as per configured session-timeout.
*@OP*
Problem 1:
Try to a write an implementation of sessionListener / sessionAttributeListener (for having a check on user loggins and apply a global filter which checks available users who have already logged in)
Hope the below thread might give you some idea of how to go about.
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5226527&messageID=9922478
Problem 2:
consequently configure session-timeout parameter in minutes under web.xml for session browser close and inactivity state problems.
REGARDS,
RaHuL

Multiple Sessions in CMC for the same user

Hello,
Version: BOE XI R2 SP3
A user opens an Xcelsius Dashboard. As they are using the dashboard, multiple calls are being made through QaaWS to the database. In CMC, we can see multiple sessions created for that user. However, this is not 100% consistent.
Why are there multiple sessions created for one user consuming one dashboard? Shouldn't everything result in one session?
Thank you,
Scott

Thank you Greg,
The user shows multiple session after opening and refreshing just one Xcelsius Dashboard over and over again. It is using QaaWS to get its data.
Also, as you mentioned, we are also seeing problems with Logout. Sometimes, users click the logout, but their session does not terminate. Other times, it does terminate. And, also, sometimes the logout button does not work. The user is forced to just close the browser window.
Any ideas?
Scott

Is there a way to disable concurrent Weblogic Admin Console sessions for the same user?

A coworker on another workstation and I are able to log into same user account on the Weblogic Admin Console at the same time. I would like to restrict access so only one session per user account can be logged in to the Admin Console. Is this possible?
Alternatively, is there a way to log identifiable information (IP/workstation) when multiple sessions for one account occur at the same time?
I am using 10.3.6.0

Hi,
You could also check the http access logs for such info. There you could see records for the received requests, with each record starting with the source IP that initiated the request.
The default location for access logs is ${DOMAIN_HOME}/servers/${SERVER_NAME}/logs. Of course in your case, the ${SERVER_NAME} would be your admin server name (AdminServer if left as default).
Regards,
Mohab

How does iTunes Genius handle two libraries for the same user?

I've been reading lately about how iTunes Genius should work. To my understanding, one of its basic principles, is absorbing usage data from users in order to create a database consisting of as much information possible. I don't expect a detailed explanation about the algorithms here. I know Apple doesn't share that kind of information (for obvious reasons) and I doubt I'd be able to understand much of it anyway. What I would like to know, though, in general terms, is how does this mechanism handle an instance like mine, where I use my Apple ID on two computers - one at home, another at work. That way, I have all my songs on both computers, so I can listen to them in either location. Obviously, each such library produces different usage data.
Thanks in advance for any information, as I'm quite curious about it.

Dear Fateh,
Thanks for the reply.
The features of this plugin are:
Configurable timeout actions including alert, redirect, and logout
Optional and configurable warning message
Option to keep session alive if user isn’t truly idle. Special thanks to Martin D’Souza for a great idea on how to implement this feature.
But it cannot stop a new session for a user, if there is an active (in my definition apex_workspace_activity_log.seconds_ago<240) session already running for that user.
Regards,
Deepika.

Building a page that only shows up once for the same user...

I've been asked to create a page that only shows up once for a user. This page is to include a form that the user fills out, but once the user has filled it out, they wouldn't see the page pop up ever again. Does anyone know the best way to do this?
I was told to build an ip logger that checks the database for ip addresses and only shows the page if the ip address is unique. That might be way beyond my ability. Is there a program out there that I could possibly use?
My client wants this done asap, so any help would be much appreciated...
Thanks in advance!
Jules

Some limitations of cookies are that user needs to enable cookies, cookies expire, cookies can be deleted by the client, and they're dependent on the machine/browser that the cookie was set to. Basically, by using cookies, you as a developer do not have any control over the presentation of the data for the visitor because the visitor can manipulate how the data is presented.
That means if more than one person shares the same browser on the same computer then after user 1 visits the page and sets the cookie then users 2,3,4 or whatever will not see the landing page that was intended for a first time visitor since user 1 already set the cookie. Once cookie expires the script will not see a valid cookie so the landing page will display once again. If cookies are disabled on the browser then a cookie will never be set and the landing page will always display. If cookies are enabled on the browser and cookie is set by a user then later the user deletes the cookie from their browser then the landing page will display.
Cookies can be set and checked using javascript or server side scripting. There's plenty of information on the limitations of cookies and how to set and check for set cookies if you search online for php cookies, javascript cookies, etc. or visit http://www.w3schools.com/PHP/php_cookies.asp
Control of your data from a database is the best method of development. If you do not have a registration system currently developed and it's imperative for each individual user to complete the form before continuing on to the site, then the form you speak of *IS* the registration form and should be developed with a database. What information does the user have to complete on this form?
Sometimes there are situations where you do not want to force a signup/login for the user to access a page, yet you still want to control data to some extent. In these scenarios the use of cookies is the only reasonable alternative, which is arguably better than using an IP method. It really all depends on the circumstances that are being considered. Personally I don't think this situation is well suited for cookies or IP use. Based off the information provided I believe this should be developed using a database and server side scripting. It also depends on the importance of the page that is being displayed after the landing page and the importance of the data retrieved from the submitted form on the landing page. If it's of low importance then go with a compromised method such as cookies or IP. If the data is important then use a database.
best,
Shocker

Multiple mailboxes for the same user

I have configured mail to work with virtual domains so I can create a different mailbox for each email address but how do only allow the mail to that specific address to come through. As I don't want the local and virtual in the same mailbox.

User A can have one mailbox associated with his ID. You can create other "User A" mailboxes with different names and e-mail addresses as shared mailboxes and grant User A full mailbox rights and send as right. User A can
then connect to each one of them separately.
Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

Multiple connections for the same user.

I have EJB A and EJB B. A and B use a JCA connector that
I have written. I have matchManagedConnections set so that if user U has not used EJB A or EJB B, then a new ManagedConnection is created. If user U has used A or B then that user is given a new virtual connection created from an existing ManagedConnection. Now the problem is that if user U access' A for the first time and then access' B BEFORE A has closed the connection, then a new ManagedConnection is created for user U. Therefore in this case user U gets 2 ManagedConnections to the EIS that we are using. Eventually one of the ManagedConnections is distroyed but I would like to eliminate this in the first place. How do a get Weblogic to see that a user has a ManagedConnection before that user is done with the connection.

You can't have multiple roles on multiple connection, as you are connecting to the same website (different sub directories) ultimately.
Here is the workaround:-
You can create a new user account on your machine and can manage different roles.
Hope it helps.

C;\Windows default share session increased for the same user

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for