Cache - LookUp values

Hi,
Is there any possibility to cache the values when we used Lookup's in XI. So that we can not poll the database everytime in production environment.
Can anybody share their valueable experiences with me.
-Esha

Hi,
See the below links
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/02/sxicache--ripped-off - SXI_CACHE - Ripped Off
http://searchsap.techtarget.com/ sDefinition/0,,sid21_gci852485,00.html - 45k - Cached - Similar pages
XI Runtime cache error: Cache contents are obsolete
Cache Refresh - SAI_CACHE_REFRESH
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/11/03/cache-refresh-errors--new-phenomena
How To Handle XPI Caches in SAP NetWeaver
2004s https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c0332b2a-eb97-2910-b6ba-dbe52a01be34
also look at this forum link
XI lookups - Cache - Performance Issues
Please reward points if it helps
Thanks
Vikranth
Edited by: Khimavath Vikranth on Jun 6, 2008 3:19 AM

Similar Messages

How to get lookup value for a lookup_type and pass as a parameter in OAF

Hi,
I have requirement wherein I have to enable the "Add Attachment" Button only for a particular deliverable name.
Steps I followed
1) I have extended the corresponding Controller class.
2) Sting str1="XYZ";
3) Getting the attachment table bean and the deliverable name thru Data Mappings as Attachment is the built-in funtionality in OAF.
4)Checking if the deliverable name whether it is equal to str1 or not
Case1: If the deliverable name is not equal to str1 then I am placing the insertallowed as BOOLEAN.FALSE
Case2:If not it will be enabled.
5)The functionality as per the requirement is working fine.
6)Here for str1 I have hardcoded the value initially but I need to take up the value from a lookup created for this value because may be in future if for more than one value the "Add Attachment" Button has to enabled they it will be easy to add in the look up only. No need to change the controller class.
7) So please let me know the steps in getting the value from a lookup and have to pass the lookup values (Here str1--"XYZ","ABC","DEF") into the extended Controller Class.
Thanks in Advance,
Regards,
Ramya

Ramya,
Here for str1 I have hardcoded the value initially but I need to take up the value from a lookup created for this value because may be in future if for more than one value the "Add Attachment" Button has to enabled they it will be easy to add in the look up only. No need to change the controller class.For this u need to iterate through the lookup values.
Share ur existing Controller Code.
Regards,
Gyan

Workflow Activity "Lookup Value" returns An error occured while enumerating the filter using [//WorkflowData/customvalue]

I want to generate an Accountname using EmployeeID, FirstName and LastName via a workflow.
I'm using the Granfeldt Workflow Activity Library (https://fimactivitylibrary.codeplex.com/)
I'm using the FIM Powershell Workflow Activity (https://fimpowershellwf.codeplex.com/)
Steps:
Passing the EmployeeID, FirstName and LastName to the powershell Activity, generating a logonid based on logic.
Add-PSSnapin FIMAutomation
$EmployeeID = $fimwf.WorkflowDictionary.EmployeeID
$Forename = $fimwf.WorkflowDictionary.Firstname
$Lastname = $fimwf.WorkflowDictionary.Lastname
'logic creating a custom logonid here
==> This works
Returning data back to the workflow via that powershell script:
$fimwf.WorkflowDictionary.Add('NewAccountName',$newlogonid)
==> This works
Using Lookup Value Activity to read the Workflow data and update the [//Target/AccountName] fails.
This gives an error:
An error occurred while enumerating the filter 'string' .
(where string is the actual generated userid that I've got back from the powershell script. Example dab2563)
I tried with only [//WorkflowData], then this gives the error:
Index was outside the bounds of the array.
Any hints to solve this?
Kind regards,
David

The Lookup Activity is for looking up an object in the FIM Service. Seems like thats not what you're trying to accomplish.
For updating the target of the workflow, just use the built-in Function Evaluator. The Lookup WF was not built for that and it is failing because you have not specified a valid XPAth lookup filter, such as /Person[AccountName='BillG']
Regards, Soren Granfeldt
blog is at http://blog.goverco.com | facebook https://www.facebook.com/TheIdentityManagementExplorer | twitter at https://twitter.com/#!/MrGranfeldt

Cache lookup failed

Dear Experts,
I am stuck on the error :*' ERROR [HY000] ERROR: fmgr_info: function 0: cache lookup failed'* while calling a stored procedure(SP).
The function in the SP run successfully but while calling the same SP from call function then it is executing this type of error.
Please suggest
Best Regards,
Manish

hi guys,
sorry where to post this issue.But i am trying this in netezza.
dear p0428,
my calling function is
call AEI_OPS_MD_STEP_CHECK_PROC(1,1,1,1)
and the called function is :
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE AEI_OPS_MD_STEP_CHECK_PROC(INTEGER, INTEGER, INTEGER, INTEGER)
RETURNS integer
LANGUAGE NZPLSQL AS
BEGIN_PROC
DECLARE
pAPP_ID ALIAS FOR $1;
pSUB_ID ALIAS FOR $2;
pJOB_ID ALIAS FOR $3;
pSTEP_ID ALIAS FOR $4;
STATUS_CHECK INTEGER;
BEGIN
SELECT CASE DSL.PROC_STATUS
WHEN 0 THEN 0
WHEN 1 THEN 1
WHEN 2 THEN 1
ELSE 3 END
INTO STATUS_CHECK
FROM DEVELOPER.AEI_APPLICATION DA
JOIN DEVELOPER.AEI_SUBJECT_AREA DSA
ON DA.APPLICATION_ID = DSA.APPLICATION_ID
AND DA.APPLICATION_ID = pAPP_ID
AND DSA.SUBJECT_AREA_ID = pSUB_ID
JOIN DEVELOPER.AEI_JOB DJ
ON DSA.APPLICATION_ID = DJ.APPLICATION_ID
AND DSA.SUBJECT_AREA_ID = DJ.SUBJECT_AREA_ID
AND DJ.JOB_ID = pJOB_ID
JOIN DEVELOPER.AEI_STEP DS
ON DJ.APPLICATION_ID = DS.APPLICATION_ID
AND DJ.SUBJECT_AREA_ID = DS.SUBJECT_AREA_ID
AND DJ.JOB_ID = DS.JOB_ID
AND DS.STEP_ID = pSTEP_ID
LEFT OUTER JOIN DEVELOPER.AEI_STEP_LOG DSL
ON DS.APPLICATION_ID = DSL.APPLICATION_ID
AND DS.SUBJECT_AREA_ID = DSL.SUBJECT_AREA_ID
AND DS.JOB_ID = DSL.JOB_ID
AND DS.STEP_ID = DSL.STEP_ID
AND DA.CURRENT_LOG_ID = DSL.LOG_ID
Return 1;
END;
END_PROC;
where DA,DSA,DJ,DSL are the tables
Help is hugely appreciable
manish

How to achieve transport of value mapping replication cache table values ?

During the migration of our interface from XI3.0 to PI 7.11,
I need to transport the value mapping replication cache table values present in cache monitoring of runtime workbench in
XI 3.0 PRD to PI 7.11 DEV .
Please let me know the ways to acheive this so that I can have the same values present in PI 7.11 Value Mapping Cache table as maintained in XI 3.0.
Please point me into correct direction.
Regards
PS

Click on "Tools" option, select "Export Configuration Objects" -> "Individual Objects" -> Choose the "Value Mapping Group" type, and then select the value mappings you want to transport.

VLOOKUP not reading lookup value correctly

Hi,
I'm having a problem with my VLOOKUP. For my lookup value, I'm using a cell containing a RANDBETWEEN so that whenever I refresh with F9, I would get a new number in the RANDBETWEEN cell, which will then make VLOOKUP show the cell corresponding to the newly
generated number.
This isn't exactly what I did, but this is an example of the basic gist of what I was trying to do.
On Worksheet A, I had Column A list numbers 1 through 12, while Column B had January through December.
On Worksheet B, I had Cell A1 contain RANDBETWEEN(1,12) and Cell B1 contain VLOOKUP(A1,'Worksheet A'!$A$1:$B$12,2)
So, when I pressed F9, I would be able to get RANDBETWEEN to generate a random number between 1 and 12, and the VLOOKUP would generate the corresponding name of the month.
However, when I tried this, the random numbers continued to be generated, but the VLOOKUP did not keep up with the new numbers being generated. What did I do wrong? I tried using my file on Onedrive's version of Excel as well as OpenOffice Calc, and none
of them are working.
As noted in my username, I am still in the beginning stages of learning Excel. So, if I'm doing something stupid, please be easy on me...
Thank you for your time.

Could you create a stripped-down copy of the workbook (without sensitive information) and make it available through one of the websites that let you upload and share a file, such as Microsoft OneDrive (https://onedrive.live.com),
FileDropper (http://filedropper.com) or DropBox (http://www.dropbox.com). Then post a link to the uploaded and shared file here.
Or register at www.eileenslounge.com (it's free) and post a message in the Excel forum. You can attach files up to 250 KB to a post there (zipped if necessary).
Regards, Hans Vogelaar (http://www.eileenslounge.com)

Group by Clause displaying all lookup values

Hello Friends
I've a simple table with columns namely Date, Reason, Product and Count and the sample data is displayed below.
==========================
Date Reason Product Count
==========================
06/08/2012 Reason1 Home 1
07/08/2012 Reason2 Motor 1
08/08/2012 Reason1 Home 1
09/08/2012 Reason3 Home 2
10/08/2012 Reason1 Home 1
06/08/2012 Reason5 Home 1
===========================
In total I've 5 reason lookup values from Reason1 through to Reason5, but the above table consists of few of them.
I would like to diplay result per day and take an example of 6th August, I want to display below result, i.e. display all 5 reason looksup and assign zero count if there are no records for that day.
=====================================
DATE REASON HOME_COUNT MOTOR_COUNT
=====================================
06/08/2012 Reason1 1 0
06/08/2012 Reason2 0 1
06/08/2012 Reason3 0 0
06/08/2012 Reason4 0 0
06/08/2012 Reason5 1 0
=====================================
If we write group by clause, missing reasons like Reason3 and Reason4 will not be displayed in the result set.
And I've tried to write multiple UNION ALL queries to get the above result which works fine, but if there 100 lookup values, I do not want to write 100 Union queries.
Please let me know if you have any analytical functions to display the end results?
Thanks
Murali.
Edited by: Muralidhar b on Aug 19, 2012 8:17 PM

If you followed relational design, you have reason lookup table. If you do not have it you should create one. Also, date is reserved word and count is a keyword, so do not use them as column names. Then use outer join:
SQL> create table tbl as
2 select to_date('06/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy') dt,'Reason1' reason,'Home' product,1 qty from dual union all
3 select to_date('07/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason2','Motor',1 from dual union all
4 select to_date('08/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason1','Home',1 from dual union all
5 select to_date('09/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason3','Home',2 from dual union all
6 select to_date('10/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason1','Home',1 from dual union all
7 select to_date('06/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason5','Home',1 from dual
8 /
Table created.
SQL> create table reason_list as
2 select 'Reason' || level reason from dual connect by level <= 5
3 /
Table created.
SQL> select d.dt,
2          r.reason,
3          nvl(
4              sum(
5                  case product
6                    when 'Home' then qty
7                  end
8                 ),
9              0
10             ) home_qty,
11          nvl(
12              sum(
13                  case product
14                    when 'Motor' then qty
15                  end
16                 ),
17              0
18             ) motor_qty
19    from      (
20               select min_dt + level - 1 dt
21                 from (
22                        select min(dt) min_dt,
23                                max(dt) max_dt
24                          from tbl
25                       )
26                 connect by level <= max_dt - min_dt + 1
27              ) d
28          cross join
29              reason_list r
30          left join
31              tbl t
32            on (
33                    t.dt = d.dt
34                and
35                    t.reason = r.reason
36               )
37    group by d.dt,
38             r.reason
39    order by d.dt,
40             r.reason
41 /
DT        REASON                                           HOME_QTY MOTOR_QTY
06-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 1          0
06-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          0
06-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 0          0
06-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
06-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 1          0
07-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 0          0
07-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          1
07-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 0          0
07-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
07-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 0          0
08-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 1          0
DT        REASON                                           HOME_QTY MOTOR_QTY
08-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          0
08-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 0          0
08-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
08-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 0          0
09-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 0          0
09-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          0
09-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 2          0
09-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
09-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 0          0
10-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 1          0
10-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          0
DT        REASON                                           HOME_QTY MOTOR_QTY
10-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 0          0
10-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
10-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 0          0
25 rows selected.
SQL> SY.

How to pass one lookup value to another lookups

Hi All,
I've two relational sources with a join condition,added lookup and kept join condition too.I've to pass this lookup value to another lookup.
let me know how we can handle this in odi.
Thanks

If you don't use "expression in the SELECT clause" option, why don't you simply drag and drop your file datastores in your canvas and do a standard join?
The result will be the same.
See here for more details : Re: Lookup Vs Join

Lookup value not getting populated...

I am using following xml code (copy.asmx > method CopyIntoItems). Per Microsoft
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/websvccopy.copy.copyintoitems(v=office.14).aspx I should be able to update lookup fields value as well because Lookup list is on the same subsite and both source and target libraries are on the same sub-site as well.
Any idea? Item gets copies and all the columns get populated except the lookup column. I verified that the ID and value matches for the lookup value.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:soap="htthttschemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:m="schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/">
<soap:Header>
</soap:Header>
<soap:Body>
<m:CopyIntoItems>
<m:SourceUrl>http://internal.col.com/sales/bymonth/Active/0973410.pdf</m:SourceUrl>
<m:DestinationUrls>
<m:string>http://internal.col.com/sales/bymonth/NonActive/0973410.pdf</m:string>
</m:DestinationUrls>
<m:Fields>
<m:FieldInformation Type="Text" DisplayName="Sales Code" InternalName="SalesID" Value="99999"></m:FieldInformation>
<m:FieldInformation Type="Text" DisplayName="Sales Person Name" InternalName="FullName" Value="TEST, John S."></m:FieldInformation>
<m:FieldInformation Type="Choice" DisplayName="FileSection" InternalName="PersonnelFileSection" Value="1- New Hire Paperwork, ECA, Termination, LOA"></m:FieldInformation>
<m:FieldInformation Type="Choice" DisplayName="FileCategory" InternalName="PersonnelFileCategory" Value="Termination Paperwork"></m:FieldInformation>
<m:FieldInformation Type="Text" DisplayName="Year" InternalName="Record_x0020_Year" Value="2014"></m:FieldInformation>
<m:FieldInformation Type="DateTime" DisplayName="Effective Date" InternalName="Anniversary" Value="04/22/2014 00:00:00"> </m:FieldInformation>
<m:FieldInformation Type="Choice" DisplayName="Status" InternalName="Current_x0020_Status" Value="Terminated"></m:FieldInformation>
<m:FieldInformation Type="Lookup" DisplayName="AreaCode" InternalName="AreaCode" Id="cdae6ca0-d49c-4971-a580-2adcd7a282f1" Value="4;#1795004"></m:FieldInformation>
<m:FieldInformation Type="Text" DisplayName="Title" InternalName="Title" Value="TEST"></m:FieldInformation>
</m:Fields>
<m:Stream>base64Binary</m:Stream>
</m:CopyIntoItems>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>

How many values are pulled in the lookup column?
Also thourgh UI are you able to see values for the lookup column.
Please ensure that you mark a question as Answered once you receive a satisfactory response.

Lookup value in assignment

Hello All,
We are using lookup field value in assignment.
field1 is lookup field and Lookup table has only one field Name
Name
a
   b
   c
Field2 is lookup field and Lookup table(Cross Ref) has 2 fields Name1 Name2
Name1          Name2 (Display field)
a                      1
b                     2
   c                    3
What we are trying to do is
if field1 has value a than Field 2 needs to have value 1
i am running an assignment
in Expression window i am putting "field1.(Record)
and in table field i am putting Field2. so that depending on field1 value Field2 will be assigned values based on cross ref manitained.
Is this the right way to do it ? is there any other way around?
(we want field2 value to be poppulated dynamically based on field1 value. We have cross ref table that is referenced to Field2 as lookup table where we maintain field1 lookup value and corresponding Name2 value of Field2)
If this is the right design than i am facing one more problem ...
In Field2 lookup i have following entries
Name1                Name2
a                          1
b                         2
c                          3
d                          4
   e                         5
f                           6
g                          7
h                          8
i                           9
Now except h and i values i am getting value assigned dynamically if Field2 has values from a to g .but when it comes to h and i i am getting assignment error as Assignment failed.????
Instead of this can we have middleware like XI to take care of this cross Ref? as based on Field2 we are syndicating records to target system via middleware?

Hi,
The following are steps to be followed in the data manager to make Assignment to work.
1) Create Assignment
2) By Default Main table gets assigned .
3) Select table where you want to change.
4) Go to Assignment Editor
5) Go to Looks ups and select the Lookup value what you want to assign...
Hope this will help .
Thanks
Ganesh Kotti

Lookup values displayed in info path

Hi Experts of the world,
Here is my scenario
List A is a list of companies and their details.
List B is a order form with a lookup value on the ID of company
On my infopath form I would like to populate more information on to the form regarding the company.
So when they select company A it will display , address, postcode, telephone no ect on List B
My issue is when I go to data connection is't only displaying Company name and ID and not the rest.
I've looked on youtube and blogs and it's not answering what I wan't
This video shows me what I wan't but I would like to have all the other fields on company to come over and populate on the form when the compnay is selected
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-HnLhXVQf-M
Please help
Thank you for taking the time to read my post.
Regards

Bascially it's having the addtional fields populate in info path.
So when you click on the lookup field in the list it will bring up that particular item in another form with all it's details.
I would like that to populate in my form so when they select the ID it will auto populate the fields in the form.

Urgent! Display lookup value and return value at the same time.

We are using pop up lov.
How can we display lookup value and return value at the same time. let me claer..
Our lov query is like fallowing
select dname, deptno from dept
we want to return deptno column into a database bind text item and dname column into a display item (look up)
can we do it (we need to do)
thanks for your help.

We did it .
But pop up key lov (display description return value ) property doesn't appear for tabular forms item.
(Report Attributes pages Tabular Form Element section display As property list)
can we set or not.
Thank you.

Does coherence cache the value from the cache?

Hi, I have the question about if the coherence caches the value from the cache? I believe it does from my test, just want to get the confirmation.
I like to use an example to describe my question. For example:
If (key1, value1) are in the cache1, (value1 is an object),
for the first time, if cache1.get(key1), coherence will deserialize value1 and return. But if in the same JVM, when cache1.get(key1) is invoked again, coherence will return value1, which I believe is cached by coherence in the current JVM, and return; instead of deserializing and return it. Is that right?
I am asking this question because I found a problem in our project when use coherence. As the above example, if I use value1 = cache1.get(key1), and in our project, value1 object has a set method to change one of its internal attributes, and this method was indeed invoked after value1 get from cache1. Then in another class, value2 = cache1.get(key1) is called again, and I found out that value2's attribute will have the modified value, even cache1.put(key1, value1) is never invoked in the first place.
Of course, this kind of behavior matches the java.util.Map. But coherence cache is a cluster/distributed environment. In the above example, if on another data node, value3 = cache1.get(key1) will get the original attribute value in value3, since the deserialize object will always get the original value, unless the new value is put in explicitly by cache1.put(key1, value1).
In this case, should cache1.get(key1) always return a clone object make more sense?
Thanks

You observation is correct. More specifically for cache topologies which include an in-process cache Coherence may return the same object reference for repeated get requests on the same key. I say "may" because for any variety of reasons we may also have to retrieve a fresh copy from a remote cache server. When possible we will return existing objects for performance reasons avoiding costly things like network hops, and de-serialization. Any modifications made to an object returned from the cache will not be made automatically available to other cluster members. Additionally if these modifications are made concurrently with another thread performing a cache.put() on the same value could result in a corrupt cached value if your serialization methods are not thread-safe. Best practice dictates that unless you are sure that you are using a cache topology which does not include an in-process cache that you treat the values returned from the cache as immutable, and instead deep clone() it before making any modifications.
The distributed-scheme and remote-scheme are the only types of caches which do not include in-process caching, and thus always return "mutation safe" values. The most common in-process cache topology is near-scheme, but others include replicated-scheme, optimistic-scheme, local-scheme, and the programatically created ContinuousQueryCache.
thanks,
mark

UIX LOV: How to Design an LOV that provides lookup value to multiple field

Hi,
I've have an input form which has following fields.
1) Task Name1: (input lookup field. invokes LookupTask.uix)
2) Task Name2: (input lookup field. invokes LookupTask.uix)
3) Task Name3: (input lookup field. invokes LookupTask.uix)
4) TaskId1 (hidden form field. tied to field Task Name1)
5) TaskId2 (hidden form field. tied to field Task Name2)
6) TaskId3 (hidden form field. tied to field Task Name3)
the way I intend to have the LOV work is as follows:
The three Task Name input fields are populated by using the same LOV page LookupTask.uix. The user will select a task name from the LOV page.
When the user invokes the LoV against the TaskName1 field, and selects a value from the LoV and closes it, then it should transfer the task name from the LoV to the Task Name1 field and the corresponding task id to TaskId1 hidden field on the input page. If the LoV was invoked from the TaskName2 field, then the lookup values should be transferred to the TaskName2 and TaskId2 fields correspondingly.
I am able to make it work if there is just one pair of field, i.e. TaskName1 and TaskId1. I'm not able to make it work with multiple fields served by the LOV window.
any suggestions on making this work will be greatly appreciated.
thanks
Lalit Agarwal

Lalit -
Have you tried setting the onLovSelect attribute on the lovInput to a javascript callback function that populates the hidden form fields?
Matt Lee
UIX Team

Validate the Selected Lookup value.. Is it possible??

Hello Experts,
Can we Validate a lookup field across a Integer field??
In detail..
I have a Look up field which holds 4 digt numeric values
Order Number
0001
0002
0003
0004
Serious is a integer field where the user enters 4 digit numbers..
So, i need to validate whether the user Selected a value from Lookup Field and its the same value that he keyedin in the Serious Field Or not!!!
Did anyone face similar situation!! If so how did you resolve, i have tried many tricks in validation but not sure What i am missing!!
I have tried the below but it did not Work..
IF (Order Number.[Record] = Serious,TRUE)
KR
John

To be very specific..
My Maintable has..
1) Material Type - Lookup Field
    Lookup values:
    Raw material
    Storage
2) Order Number - Lookup field
Lookup values:
0001
0002
0003
DUMMY
3) Serious - Text Field With length as 4
Now my requirement is IF Material Type is Raw material THEN Order Number Should be Equal to DUMMY or Equal to Serious...
I tried may types of validatios but none worked, Like for example..
IF(Material Type . Type = Material Type [Raw material] AND Order Number . Number = Order Number [DUMMY] OR Order Number . Number = Serious , TRUE)
Did anyone face similar situation, If so how di you fix!!!!
Please Help
KR
John

Cache - LookUp values

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for