Calculation of output tax A1 in only through Sd but nto through F-22

Hi all,
While making posting through SD transaction VA01 by giving output tax code A1,tax is getting calculated but the same tax code A1 when used in TCode F-22 (manual FI posting) tax is not getting calculated even if we check the calculate tax and give the tax code A1.
Can anybody please explain why it is not getting calculated through F-22.
Thanks in advance, points are reward for the relevant answer.
Regards
SAINT

VA01 (Create Sales Order) does not create any FI postings. Tax may be getting calculated basing on the rate in the tax code definition and must be appearing on the sales order conditions. But when you enter a customer invoice (F-22), it generates an FI posting and needs a GL account behind the tax code. See if there is a GL account attached to your tax code (FTXP, enter country and tax code and in the next screen, click on 'Tax accounts').

Similar Messages

Sound through speakers but not through headphones

hello i have an hp envy 15-k002ne laptop wtih beats audio. i recently reinstalled windows 8.1 on the machine and was able to get all my drivers from the hp support website and unortunately the realtek high definition audio driver for sound on my machine made it in such a way that sound only comes from my speakers but not through my headphones. i tried using different headsets but it recognises some of them as microphones only because of that feature. someone please help me for i have been restless for days. thanks in advance

Hi @aflokko ,
Welcome to the HP Forums!
I would like to take a moment and thank you for using the forum, it is a great place to find answers. For you to have the best experience in the HP forum, I would like to direct your attention to the HP Forums Guide First Time Here? Learn How to Post and More.
I understand that you recently reinstalled Windows 8.1 and were able to get all the drivers from the HP support website.
You have audio through your speakers but not your headsets.
Have you ran The HP Support Assistant to aid with HP updates and resolving issues?
Have you tried Using Automated Troubleshooting (Windows 8) to aid with this difficulty?
Here is a link to Troubleshooting Audio Problems with External Speakers, Headphones, and HDMI Sound Devices that should help.
If you are still having an issue, I suggest contacting HP support for further assistance.
Please call our technical support at 800-474-6836. If you live outside the US/Canada Region, please click the link below to get the support number for your region Technical Support Sitemap .
Sparkles1
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

SQL query can be executed through TOAD but not through Discoverer

Hallo, everybody:
Got another problem. A SQL query can be executed through TOAD, but when I want to execute it by a worksheet of Discoverer Plus, it always shows there is no data.
PS: I copied this query from Discoverer Plus to TOAD, which means, this query is generated through the Discoverer. Does anybody know about how could it be?
Thank you.
Geng

Hi,
If you are able to get data in TOAD with the same user credential as that of Discoverer Plus then it will implies an issue with Discoverer.
Else it is privilege issue , your TOAD user has select privilege to the base objects (tables/views etc) where as your Disoverer used does not.
Compare the privileges granted to these 2 users and you can narrow done to the issue .
Thanks,
Sutirtha

Can't logon to directory through sync_user, but can through Tx LDAP - Find

Hi,
I'm trying to import users into SAP from MS Active Directory using RSLDAPSYNC_USER. When running it I get the error "Could not logon to directory" with the diagnosis "The combination of user name (DN) and password transferred to the directory was not accepted by the directory."
My settings in RSLDAPSYNC_USER is:
Connection: the only server and connector I have created
User: no information entered here
Both Dir and DB: Ignore
Only Dir: Create in DB
Only DB: Ignore
Time meas: no information entered here
I have not extended the schema since I don't want to change anything in AD, only copy the users from AD into SAP. I have set Import Mapping, and Import Synch on all my fields in LDAPMAP, and one field with the additional indicators Filter, Export mapping, RDN Mapping (since theses apparently are required, even if you don't want to write anything in the AD?).
I can however logon to the server using Tx LDAP, and I manage to get search results using Find in Tx LDAP. I have only created one LDAP server, one System User and one LDAP Connector in Tx LDAP.
I have tried to use both Simple Memory and Secure Storage as the Credential Storage for the System User. I have entered the password for the user in credentials. When I for testing purporses choose Simple Memeory and also remove the credentials for the System User, and try to run RSLDAPSYNC_USER again, I get the following messaged:
<green> Conenction created to server AD_X
<red> Operation Failed
<red> LDAP_SEARCH failed
<red> The system could not create the directory object ppol
<green> Connection to server AD_X terminated
Can I interpret this error message in some way? Logically I think my first try should work since I'm using the same server/user/connector when running RSLDAPSYNC_USER and it fails, as I do when I run a Find through Tx LDAP and it works.
Is there something I'm missing?
Thanks, Oscar

The order of the DN of the user was wrong... it worked when I switched places of the DCs...

Discoverer report accessible through Desktop but not through Viewer

Does anyone have a hint for me about this problem: we can use a Discoverer report via Discoverer Desktop, but when we try to access the same report through Discoverer Viewer, we get an error message: the page cannot be found.

It sounds like discoverer viewer may not be correctly configured or the permissions on the database account may not be correct. Can you run any reports through Discoverer viewer as any other user? What version of Discoverer are you running?
Matt Topper
TUSC, The Oracle Experts
[email protected]

Beat audio low volume through speakers but okay through headphones

My beats audio works fine through my headphones but the volume through the speakers is not very loud. I am teaching a class where I need to have the volume loud enough for people to hear it across a small room, not huddled around my laptop. I have a HP pavilion dv6, windows 7

Hi trirainbow,
For what is described in your post, it sounds as though it is probably functioning as designed. I have tested a similar notebook in a small room, and need to use external powered speakers for it to be audible. Double check all the volumes to make sure that they are maxed, and what program are you using for your presentation?
Thank you.
I worked on behalf of HP

Heard through speakers but not through applicati

Greetings,
Right now with my Audigy 2 card I can plug in my scanner to the line in and hear it through the speakers but I can not use the audio with applications. Another example, connecting line in to my Ham radio I can hear the traffic through the speakers but can not process the audio through a ham radio application.
Any ideas?
Thanks.

I recently got the same problem. Its not that bad but confused me at first. If that is the worst problem you get with your computer consider yourself lucky. You could bring it by an apple store genius and see what they say but its most likely a switch problem like tteuer said. If my memory serves me right that switch is connected to the logic board, if you have it still under warranty, great, if not, you might as well get another laptop if it really bothers you.
Tip: I have made it work by either slowly removing the headphone from the jack or rotating it. If that did not work the first time I repeated it.

IPhone won't charge through dock but will through same cable

Hello All
I have been facing some weird issues since last couple of weeks. I will try to be as clear and descriptive of my problems as I can.
What I have:
I have an iPhone 4S, two iPhone docks I bought with the 4S.
Current setup:
One dock is connected to wall mount through iPad charger.
Second one is connected to my thunderbolt display.
What does happen:
I am able to charge my iPhone when I connect with either of the cables directly (removing the docks).
What doesn't happen:
I am not able to charge my iPhone when I connect with either of the cables with either of the docks.
Any thing shown by device:
It doesn't give any error messages, just the charging symbol changes to "Full Charge" symbol and I think (I think) it charges the phone really really slow.
What I tried doing:
Googling the problem (and failed)
Restarting the iPhone
What I am looking for:
Any one got any clue as to what could be happening? or any steps that I should follow to perhaps find a solution to this?
Thanks
Sajat Jain

Reinstall iTunes. If that doesn't work, remove and reinstall AMDS:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1747

No rows returns through Oracle, but lots through MS SQL with same SQL.

Help. I am running the following statement on the Oracle 9i Database. The db link @scala references a MS SQL database running on a Windows 2003 machine connecting using the hsodbc.exe with HS.
SELECT
'Scala' "System"
,"A"."Emission Period" "EP"
,"A"."Client Contact Num" "Contract"
,sum("A"."Amount") "Scala_VIC"
FROM
"_GL030106_CC"@scala "CC"
INNER JOIN ("_GL030106_VT"@scala "VT"
INNER JOIN "_GL060106"@scala "A"
ON "VT"."Acc Dim" = "A"."Product")
ON "CC"."Acc Dim" = "A"."Client Contact Num"
where
     not "A"."Account" in (N'80000000',N'70500000',N'46110001')
and "A"."Client Contact Num" <> N'100000'
and "A"."Emission Period" <> ''
and "A"."Product" in (N'080',N'088')
and "A"."Emission Period" >= N'0444'
GROUP BY
"A"."Emission Period", "A"."Client Contact Num"
HAVING
sum("A"."Amount") <> 0
ORDER BY
"A"."Emission Period"
,"A"."Client Contact Num"
This runs and returns 0 rows. I can select data from the tables and get lots of data back, so the connection is working fine. If I run the following command on MS SQL I get 115 rows.
SELECT
'Scala' "System"
,"A."Emission Period" "EP"
,"A"."Client Contact Num" "Contract"
,sum("A"."Amount") "Scala_VIC"
FROM
"iScalaDB"."dbo"."_GL030106_CC" "CC"
     INNER JOIN ("iScalaDB"."dbo"."_GL030106_VT" "VT"
     INNER JOIN "iScalaDB"."dbo"."_GL060106" "_GL060103"
          ON "VT"."Acc Dim"="A"."Product")
     ON "CC"."Acc Dim"="A"."Client Contact Num"
WHERE
not "A"."Account" in (N'80000000',N'70500000',N'46110001') /* Take out Stats, Income and Old accounts */
and "A"."Client Contact Num" <> N'100000' /*Ignore NASS Accounts */
and "A"."Emission Period" <> '' /*Ignore blank EPs */
and "A"."Product" in (N'080',N'088') /* Select Scala CCC & CCP Voucher products */
and "A"."Emission Period" >= N'0444'
GROUP BY
"A"."Emission Period"
,"A"."Client Contact Num"
HAVING
sum("A"."Amount") <> 0
ORDER BY
"A"."Emission Period"
,"A"."Client Contact Num"
Is there anything in the SQL that is wrong or is it the HS connectivity that is causing the problem?

I have been trawling around this forum for similar issues and may have posted the original isue in the wrong post.
I have deducted that there is not a solution for this, using MSSQL2005 64bit you cannot get the msdaora to work( cos its 32 bit)
There is an issue with oracle oledb provider (OraOLEDB.Oracle) and ref cursors come on ORACLE get it bleeding sorted
If anyone else out there has been thwarted by the same problem then all I can suggest is that they utilise a production 32bit SQL2005 box and use it as a proxy to oracle with the msdaora if they can.

Error for output tax code:Tax code I4 may only contain one assignment line.

Hi
While posting customer invoice with output tax code, I am getting following error.
Tax code I4 may only contain one assignment line.
Please help me resolve.
Regards
Rekha

There are quite some answered questions in this forum for this issue.
Here is one.
Error in Sample document (Message no. FF731)
Also, please search the forum with the following search key words.
Tax AND code AND may AND only AND contain AND one AND assignment AND line
Make sure you select all posts, not just the past 90 days (the default option), and you will see quite some hits.

Error In MIRO GL account allows only output tax

Hello All,
We are facing an error in MIRO that GL account xxxxx allows only out put tax. The scinario & settings are as below.
FB60
There is no error when using the particular tax code sytem posts the document
MIRO
Same vendor & tax code used as in FB60
The systemshows an error that GL ***** allows only output tax.
TAX CODE settings in FTXP
The GL showing error is in tax code
GL settings
In GL master data in control tab , the tax category is defined as out put tax
QUERY
Why in FB60 it allows the GL & not in MIRO ( Both are vendor invoice and suppose to work in similar manner)
please note in both the cases the entries are same
Vendor Cr
Expense / Stock Dr
VAT GL **** Cr
VAT GL-2 Dr
VAT GL**** is not picking @ MIRO & Picks @ FB60 with out any error
Any Idea !!!
Thanks & Regards
Arun R

Hi,
The problem is resolved .
The error was due to the fact that the VAT was an aquisiton tax for europe.
The details are in note 373587
Thanks for the support
Regards
Arun

Input Tax and Output Tax calculating wrong figures

Hi,
I have created Input Tax and Output Tax codes in SAP.
Input Tax- 3%
Output Tax- 4%
All the configuration is done as required. But when I am posting the Purchase and Sales Invoice, the tax amount is not calculating correctly.
For example:
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)
Input Tax Calculation in SAP:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 30000)
The same is happening to Output Tax transactions.
Please advice.

My understanding about the Input Tax and Output Tax was wrong. In the issue reported
Input Tax Calculation should be:
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29100
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 900 (@3% on 30000)---my understanding was wrong.
Input Tax 3% should be charged on Expense amount, in this case Rs 30000. But because in the editing option calculate tax on net amount option was not selected, hence SAP was giving the below entry, which is correct as well.
Vendor A/C.............. Cr 30000-
Expense A/C............ Dr 29126.21
Input Tax A/C............ Dr 873.79 (@3% on 29126.21) which is correct.
Hence, the Vendor amount should be Expense + Input Tax= 30000 * 3%=900 + 30000 (expense) = 30900.
Correct Entry should be:
Vendor A/C...............Cr 30900
Expense A/C............Dr 30000
Input Tax A/C............Dr 900
Resolved. Pankaj has given the correct answer.

While creating VK11 for output tax it should allow only Output taxcode

Hi all,
while creating condition record VK11 for output tax ,in condition record only output tax code should be possible ,if they use any input tax code then error messsage should come or system should not allow to create.how we do this.
Thanks in Advance,
Bala

Hi ,
If you see it practically in Production..You will be maintaing condition record once and even if changes, it won't be so often. Secondly in Tax procedure what ever Tax codes are present that will displayed as a choice while maintainig condition record.
If it affecting by maintaining wrong code then better would to be educate Business users as per my understanding.
Thanks,
Veerendra

Condition value on Output tax (MWST) is wrong calculated

Hi experts,
I am facing an error when we are creating sales orders using the function module BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2. For different sales order position with the same price I am obtaining different condition value.
For example,
Sales Document item = 20 for Material1
CnTy
Name
Amount
per
UOM
Condition Value
ZE01
Price list SB
1.333,33
100
PC
13,33
ZE02
Customer Price SB
1.600,00
100
PC
16,00
MWST
Output Tax
20,000%
2,67
ZE03
Rounding Off
0,00
0,00
Sales Document item = 110 for Material2
CnTy
Name
Amount
per
UOM
Condition Value
ZE01
Price list SB
1.333,33
100
PC
13,33
ZE02
Customer Price SB
1.600,00
100
PC
16,00
MWST
Output Tax
20,000%
2,63
ZE03
Rounding Off
0,00
0,00
I don't know which could be the reason why the output tax is differing in both items with the same price (2,67 vs 2,63). Could you please guide me to get a solution?
Lots of thanks,
Javier

Hi G. Lakshmipathi,
I was trying to find the differences explained but I can't identify the issue.
These are the screen shots of both item positions:
Item number 20:
Ítem number 110:
Hope it helps to find a solution.
Thanks again,
Javier

Automatic Calculation of Input Tax in a Purchase Order

Hi SAP Gurus!
Good day! Please help with my problem. During my creation of a Purchase Order, I will have to indicate what Tax Code to use. In this case, I use "Input Tax 12%". On the Item Condition TAB, the calculation of the input tax is not reflected. How can I customize this, in order for us to see the breakdown of Taxes automatically?
Thank you.
Mik

Hi Mik,
If you maintain the tax codes in the system for your company code then the tax codes will be picked automatically in PO through FTXP and the same is reflected in PO.In Invoice tab you have to give tax code, then in Condition tab, the values will be calculated as per the condition values maintained for the tax code.No need to maintain any thing in pricing procedure.
If your tax procedure in TAXINN, you have to maintain the condition records for the condition types ( JMOP, JEC1, JSEP etc..), then only the values can be shown in PO in Condition tab.In TAXINN, the tax code has to be assigned to the company code.
Regards,
Gangadhar Y

Calculation of output tax A1 in only through Sd but nto through F-22

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for