Calculation of planned revenue after upgrade to ECC 6.0

Hi,
I have a customer who has done an upgrade from 4.7 to ECC 6.0.
When running results analysis for service contracts, TC KKAK, the amount of planned revenue is wrong. It doesn't pick up the value from table VBAP, field VBAP-NETWR, but it looks as though it picks up the target value and multiplies it with the number of entries in the billing plan. The error doesn't occur for all contracts, but for many of them.
I have searched notes both from SAP Help and from the upgrade forum, but didn't find any to be of help.
Did any of you experience the same?
Thank you
Regards,
Berit Eide

This issue was also posted with an OSS-message to SAP, and the solution was to run this  program SD_PLANVALUE_UPDATE
Berit

Similar Messages

  • ERROR MESSAGE IN PPOME TCODE AFTER UPGRADE TO ECC 6.0

    Hi Experts,
    I have a question.
    Recently our system went for upgrade and during testing phase we have found one issue.
    Error message is appearing in PPOME transactio code after upgrade to ECC 6.0
    The screen is getting defaulted to Budget section and unable to find the subtype as there are no subtypes available there and showing error message as "Fill in all required fields".
    Please let me know your solution on this.
    Regards,
    Sekhar.

    Hi,
    - you can deactivate the budget tab in the IMG-activity 'Hide/Show Tab Page'
    (SIMG_CFMENUOHP1HFW20 alternatively use SM30 on view 'T77OCTABUS')
    1. Create new entries for the following KEY:
    a) Scenario OME0
    b) Object type 'P', 'O', 'S'
    c) Tab Page 'PBC_ORIG'
    2. for each of this entries, set the 'Exclude Tab Page'-Flag.
    - in case you do not want to deactivate the Budget tab:
    The error occurs due to missing entries for subtypes in table T778U
    for infotype 1516.
    Please maintain the according subtyes you want to use if you create a
    budget.
    Regards,
    Ana

  • Special Characters in Packed Field After Upgradation from ECC 5 to ECC 6

    Hi All,
    After Upgraded from ECC 5 to ECC 6, we are getting error as 'Packed field contains incorrect BCD format'.
    I found the error in below code..
    CALL METHOD cl_abap_container_utilities=>read_container_c
          EXPORTING
            im_container           = j_2iextrct-extrctdata
          IMPORTING
            ex_value               = i_rg23part2-i_part2_typ
          EXCEPTIONS
            illegal_parameter_type = 1
            OTHERS                 = 2.
    i_rg23part2-i_part2_typ-EXAED = 0.<0
    i_rg23part2-i_part2_typ-CESS   = 0.<0
    for some packed fields special characters are appearing, which leads to a short dump.
    Any Suggestions.....
    Thanks,
    Satish Reddy.
    Edited by: Sathish Reddy on Jun 25, 2010 4:49 PM
    Edited by: Sathish Reddy on Jun 26, 2010 11:01 AM
    Edited by: Sathish Reddy on Jun 29, 2010 12:58 PM
    Edited by: Sathish Reddy on Jun 30, 2010 11:51 AM

    HELLO,
    Search the form you will get few links.
    Also many companies have gone technical upgradation , but not functional upgradation.
    Thanks
    RK

  • Statistical-relevent delivery date not showing up in PO after upgrad to ECC

    Hi Gurus,
    After upgrade to ECC, Statistical-relevant delivery date (PO Item details --> delivery schedule tab) is not showing up when I convert PR to PO from Stock requirements list(MDO7).
    Could you please help me out this issue.

    Maintain the item category in your material master at sales organisation level and try again.
    Also Please Check the delivery item category determination in trxn code 0184 there you define which item category is to be found for the combination of delivery type NL and item category group.
    Regards,
    Ashok
    Edited by: Ashok Kumar Telikula on Aug 27, 2008 2:35 PM

  • Barcode doesn't work after upgrade to ECC

    Hi All,
    In sapscript, we used bardcode. But after upgrade to ECC, it doesn't work.
    Could you help me about it??
    And we don't want to convert the sapscript to smartforms and use the new barcode technique.
    Looking forward you help!!
    Thanks & Best Regards,

    Hi ,
    I think some function moule is missed, please check the driver program also. In production you are getting Barcodes ?. Or otherwise goto se73 - we have bar codes types.. system and printer barcodes . please assign the printer bar codes in output devices.
    Best Regards,
    Narasimha Rao.

  • Error AA662 in Asset accounting after upgrade to ECC 6

    Hi,
    After upgrade to ECC6 from R3 Enterprise, when we try to browse an asset,  using transaction code AW01N,  and go to posted values/Comparisons tab we get the following error:
    SYST: You cannot change the depreciation periods
         Message no. AA662
    Asset affected: 000000003983-0000
    Diagnosis
        Processing terminated because the number of depreciation periods in company code 1100 has been changed. However, you cannot change the number of
        periods in your live (productive) system.
    Procedure
        Change the depreciation periods back to the original value in company code 1100. The number of depreciation periods is determined by the fiscal year version and the use of half-periods. At least one of these parameters was changed.
         If you want to change your system so that you can now work with half-periods, you have to use depreciation keys with time-dependent period control in that company code.
        If you need to make general changes to the number of periods for calculating depreciation per fiscal year, you will have to consult your system administrator.
    We were not getting this error in R3 enterprise. We have tried implementing sap note 1009699 but it does not resolve the issue. What we observed is, AA662  occurs if you change the number of period in the fiscal year version or the use of half-periods, after you have already posted to assets. The most common cause is a different value in field ANLB-PERFY which is the number of periods in the fiscal year. If the number entered here does not correspond to the number of posting periods of the fiscal year used, the system raises error AA662 (except for none posted areas for which ANLB-PERFY = 000 or areas with depreciation to the date for which ANLB-PERFY = 365). For us there are many assets with ANLB-PERFY=24.
    Is there a way to fix this problem by some config change or data fix. If any of you have come across a similar issue or have any insights on the same, please respond back.
    Regards,
    Milan
    ([email protected])

    Hi All,
    I could not find any solution to fix this in new depreciation calculation method. I also did not get any help from SAP or SDN. So, we decided to switch back to the old calculation method.
    There are 3 ways of implementing the old calculation.
    1. SAP Note 984161 : Code change at ABAP level.
    2. User Level : By setting the user parameter FAA_DC_SWITCH to OLD
    3. By default Config : If we make an entry in V_TABWD_VID in SM30 and create a new entry with Acct. Transaction ID to 'AMBUAFAR000000000000', It should use old calculation method.
    Thanks,
    Milan
    +1-310-691-3978
    +91-994-571-5063

  • Distribution rule creation is not possible in CJIC after upgradation of ecc

    We are using  settlements for PS in ECC 6.0. Trying to partial settlement for WBS from CJ70 tcode, unable to find Final Settlement button/ icon where we give amount for settlement after some service patch upgrade .Can any one pls suggest any alternative /solution for this. Even it is same with T-Code CJIC too. your information we have undergone upgradation from 4.7 to ecc 6.0.we can be able to run these transactions in 4.7.I know this can be done through CJ88.But due some specific reasons i want to run these t-codes.(CJ70 & CJIC)
    Thanks in advance.
    regards
    Thanna

    No in addition to display ,you can maintain settlement rule also. In cj88 we are not able to settle by amount.so will maintain settlement rule by amount in cj70 & we will do settlement by cj88.this we did it in 4.7 version but after upgradation we could nt do it.
    thanks for your reply.
    regards
    hari

  • Short dump in BP after upgrade to ECC 6.0

    Hi,
    We have upgraded system to ECC 6.0 from ECC 5.0
    After upgrade system is giving short dump in transaction BP, event tried to navigate on BP screen.
    Short dump description:
    A RAISE statement in the program "CL_OS_TRANSACTION=============CP" raised the exception condition  "OS_COMMIT_TOP_FAILED".                                             
    Since the exception was not intercepted by a superior program, processing was terminated.
    Please advise to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Dipak

    When exactly does this error appear? On save? clicking on a specific entry?
    I suggest opening an OSS call for this problem, this doesn't seem to known (at least I didn't find any notes)
    Markus

  • Missing some entries in trasaction OKB9 after upgrade to ECC 6.0

    We're missing some entries in transaction OKB9 after the upgrade to ECC 6.0. Pariculary, a significant number of records in table TKA3C were not copied over to ECC 6.0.
    Have anyone experience this same problem as well. We're at the early stage of unit testing a we're worried that there maybe some other config tables that were not properly copied.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Apollo

    Hi friends, i fixed this issue.Its a configuration problem.In table T882 they didnt maintaine fisical variant filed for particular compony code.Once this is maintained the problem got solved

  • Increased number of journal receivers after upgrade from ECC 5.0 to 6.0

    After are upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 on an iSeries machine we have noticed an increase in the number journal receivers being created by SAP approximately twice as many that were being created on are 5.0 system. I've checked all the attributes for the journal receivers and they were set the same on both versions. This hasn't caused use any issues but just wondering if anyone else has experienced this or knows the cause of this. Thanks, Jason Duncan

    After are upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 on an iSeries machine we have noticed an increase in the number journal receivers being created by SAP approximately twice as many that were being created on are 5.0 system. I've checked all the attributes for the journal receivers and they were set the same on both versions. This hasn't caused use any issues but just wondering if anyone else has experienced this or knows the cause of this. Thanks, Jason Duncan

  • SE07 doesn't show Import status after upgrade to ECC 6.0

    Hi,
    we were on 4.7 and we recently upgraded to ECC 6.0 EHP4. When we were on 4.7, after a release, we used to monitor the import status of all the transports going in, using transaction SE07. Looks like this transaction wouldn't work anymore in ECC6.
    I can access the transaction, but I cannot expand the "Execution" to see the status of the transports which went in today. 4.7 used to show all the transports which were impoerted on that day.
    I know we can check the import logs by pulling up each transport, but SE07 will show you a consolidated list with all the detail and will be very easy to find what we are looking for.
    We are on Oracle 11g on Solaris 10. Please help.
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Hi Tony,
    I donot think it is an authorization problem. I have tried with a test user with full permissions and also with DDIC user, but still the same.
    Regards,
    Vijay

  • Too many syntax errors after upgrade to ECC 6.0

    Hello,
    We have made a test upgrade from 4.6C to ECC 6.0. OS --> AIX 5.3; DB --> DB2 8.2. After upgrade we have a lot of syntax errors, why? Anybody has the same problem? Do I must to check all my programs?
    Thanks.
    Martin

    Hello, here there is an example in Z program, but I have seen in no Z programs too with includes or userexits in the second example.
    Thanks.
    Martin.
    first example:
    Error in the ABAP Application Program                                                                               
    The current ABAP program "GBT10CO0" had to be terminated because it has        
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.                                                                               
    The following syntax error occurred in program "ZGGBR000 " in include "ZGGBR000
    " in                                                                          
    line 279:                                                                      
    ""SYST-MODNO" must be a character-type data object (data type C, N, D, "       
    "T or STRING) ."                                                               
    second example:
    Error in the ABAP Application Program                                                                               
    The current ABAP program "SAPLGBL5" had to be terminated because it has       
    come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.                                                                               
    The following syntax error occurred in program "GBT10FI0 " in include "GBT10FIB
    " in                                                                         
    line 1288:                                                                    
    "The FORM "SEND_CMPLX_DATA_015" does not exist."

  • Different sequence for ZEILE in 2LIS_03_UM DS after upgrading to ECC 6.0

    Hi All,
    We are in process of upgrading our ERP system from 4.7 to ECC 6.0 and we test dataloading into our quality BW system (BW version = 7.0). We have loaded the data from 2LIS_03_UM DS before and after ERP upgrade into the same DSO and have encountered duplicated values for some documents (our key in DSO is based on a combination of MJAHR,MBLNR,ZEILE,BUKRS  fields). We've investigated the problem and find out that there are differences in the sequence generation for the ZEILE field.
    For example we have a document with 3 items.
    Before the ERP upgrade, the data in 2LIS_03_UM DS looks like this:
    Material  /  Item (ZEILE)
    A           /              1
    B           /        2
    C           /        3
    After the ERP upgrade, for the same document in 2LIS_03_UM DS we have:
    Material  /  Item (ZEILE)
    A            /       3
    B            /       2
    C           /        1
    Have anyone encountered this situation? How you solved it? Of course in case of corrections of historical data in DSO there is always a solution of deleting the data before reloading it. There is another solution?
    Thx,
    Simona

    Hi,
    can i know how you rectified this Problem please,
    We are getting same issue now..
    Thanks
    Raj

  • Smart form Addon after Upgrade to ECC 6 EHP4

    Hi,
    I have succesfully upgraded my system from R/3 4.7 EXT 1 to ECC 6 EHP4.
    During upgrade i had to delete Pre configured smart forms Addon ( According to note 572392 ) .
    Since we are on EHP4 and no smart forms configured we are not able to print.
    The latest pre configured smart form addon ( Best Practice all in one)  available is for EHP3.
    Please let me how to proceed with this situation as there may be other compaines who are on EHP4 and use pre configured smart forms.
    Appreciate your help.
    Thanks,
    FBK

    If you have old system copy try to copy forms into the new.
    Kind regards,
    Mirek

  • Short dump in trx VL02N and MIGO after upgrade to ECC 6.0

    Hello,
    We are doing an upgrade from R/3 46C to ECC 6.0 and we face a shortdump in trx MIGO (upon saving the document).
    DBIF_RSQL_INVALID_REQUEST
    a BKPF_INSERT in program SAPLF005
    The same shortdump happens when doing a Goods Issue on the SD side.
    Looking at the program, this is not modyfied so I guess it is a standard SAP error.
    OSS however, up to know did not respond to my message and there does not seem to be a SAP Note on this issue!
    Anyone had this problem before. How did they solve it.
    Thanks for any reply,
    Aart

    When exactly does this error appear? On save? clicking on a specific entry?
    I suggest opening an OSS call for this problem, this doesn't seem to known (at least I didn't find any notes)
    Markus

Maybe you are looking for