Calculation of with holding tax

The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards.

Similar Messages

  • Calculation of With Holding Tax amount

    Hi,
    We are using the WHT which has the Minimum amount limit as 700 at the Paying document,
    The issue is
    there is a  Paying document which clears 4 MM Invoices (Documents are coming from MIRO)
    2 MM Invoice with less than 700 amount and other 2 MM Invoice with more than 700 amount, 
    the  system is calculating the WHT for only 2 documents which are having amount less that 700 while the payment document is generated. 
    Can any one please suggest whether the  WHT should be calculated for only 2 which have amount more than 700
    OR  it will get deducted for all the 4 MM as the Total of the paying document is more that 700.
    Note : The Accumlation type in the WHT is No accumlation.
    Looking for a positive riposte.
    Thanks
    Manish

    It has to calculate for 2 docs more than 700 if you select no accumulation & "Minimum Check" Min base amount check at doc invoice level

  • Reg: Correction of Wrong  With holding tax  amount  Values Posted via BAPI

    Hello Experts,
    I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully  with Wrong  With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments )   its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
    Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in  WITH_ITEM table.....
    How am i going to do it..!
    Plz..experts help.
    Plz waiting for your input

    Dear All,
    this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • DOUBT IN CIN (WITH HOLDING TAX TDS)

    Payment occured first and Invoice occured afterwards. Now my question how to configure the system for calculation of with holding tax amount.

    Hi Prasana,
    In the TDS configuration, Define Withholding Tax Types You have to put a tick in the "Per Year, Starting with Month" accumulation type & enter the starting month.
    Next in the define witholding tax code you have to put a tick in the box "wtax form" in the calculation Tab.
    Next in the define formulas for calculating withholding tax you have to enter the formulas for calculating tax as follows:
    To base Amount, Witholding Tax Rate etc. can be maintained.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    AVD.

  • India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval

    Dear All
    Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
    Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
    (ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
    Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
    Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
    Regards
    Anilkumar

    Please go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
    also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement

  • Re: With holding tax is not picking up while excution of RERAPP

    Dear team,
    While executing the RERAPP.With holding tax is not picked.We are working on 4.7 version.We had suggested a badi to pull the with holding tax field.Still system is not showing any caluculation.Plz advice us if any one of you did the immplimenttation in 4.7 and how you resolved this problem .So that it would be help ful for us too.Please do the need ful.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    Dear Sir,
    What we did is all the with holding tax data include the basic amount calculations manually in excel there after  given the input to the system through accounting interface. You can try with your abaper. Plz make sure that GL code length and currency .This has been done through so much work around. Technical person will guide you .If you still facing the problem where exactly your facing then i can help you out.Please be more clear what you did till now then only i can explain you with clarity.
    Regards,
    Suma.

  • With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

    Hi Friends,
    We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
    Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
    As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
    With holding tax rate is 0%,
    Based on modified net amount calculation
    and
    Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
    When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
    Which causes difference in 1099 – misc vendors
    Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
    Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
    Payment going out=
    $1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 – 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
    With holding base calculation =
    $ 1000 – 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
    Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 – 900 = 8.98
    Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
    Moreover, please tell me if it’s normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
    Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
    Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

    Dear All
    i am also having the same problem. The example is
    Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
    Input Tax @ 15%   = $  15,000
    Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
    Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
    On payment the system behavior should be
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325  ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
    However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
    Debit  Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
    Debit  Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
    Credit  W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220  ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
    Credit Bank Account  = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
    this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
    Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
    Regards
    Bilal Athar

  • Re: With Holding tax

    Hi all,
          I have an issue relating to with holding tax. wtax code is not picking the percentage ammount while doing the transaction.Please provide the solution.
    Regards,
    Suma.

    What r u doing Invoicing or Advance payment. Pls chk in Config whether u have maintained percentage for that particular Tax code
    SPRO
    Financial Accounting  --> Financial Accounting Global Settings -->
    Withholding Tax --> Extended Withholding Tax --> Calculation --> Withholding Tax Code --> Define Withholding Tax Codes
    And chk in Vendor Master also whether they have maintained any Exemption code or percentage.
    If this information is useful. Pls assign Points

  • How to calculate with holding tax for the open item

    Dera all,
    Can you tel me how to simulate with holding tax for the open item? i will try do it using FI_WT_F110_CALCULATE FM  but it dosnt work. plz help me
    regard
    nawa

    Hi Sushil,
    can you please elaborate on how you resolved it. we are facing the same issue with BAPI not calculating the withholding tax data.
    Thanks,
    Sanket

  • Populating with holding tax part in WITH_ITEM using RFBIBL00

    Hi all,
          While handling with hold tax part during FB01 UPLOAD using RFBIBL00- DIRECT INPUT METHOD,i assigned WITHT, WT_WITHCD AND WT_QSSHB values to BWITH,and the tax part gets calculated and updating bseg table, but the tax part is not getting updated in WITH_ITEM  TABLE,
    can any help me out in this regard, its on high priority.
    Regards
    suresh

    From the documentation of RFBIBL00:
    Extended withholding tax functions:
    Only transactions FB01 and FBV1 are supported for the extended withholding tax functions. Direct input is not supported.
    The withholding tax data for BWITH must be transferred for every customer/vendor line item. The withholding tax data must come after the BBSEG data. A BWITH structure must be transferred for each withholding tax type.
    Rob

  • CIN With-holding Tax Table

    Dear Sir,
    I seek the kind help from the experts  as , whic is the table to give the following information related to CIN With-holding Tax :
    Information is :
    Certificate Number / Challan Number / Challan Date
    With Thanks and Regards
    B Mittal

    Hi,
    In with holding tax there are two elements :
                - Withholding types
                - Withholding codes
    each withholding type may contain several withholding codes.
    In the vendor master record, you assign the with holding type to the vendor,  so when you press F4 you get all withholding taxe codes attached to this   tax type.
    you can display and change this assignement in customizing
    Customizing >>>Financial Accounting>>> Financial Accounting  Global settings>>>Withholding tax>>>Extended Wihtholoding tax>>>Calculation>>> withholiding Tax Codes>>>Define withholiding Tax Codes
    regards

  • With holding tax report with material and qty fields

    Dear All,
    Is there any standard report available with with holding tax data with material and qty fields.
    Thanks,
    Sekhar.

    dear Friend,
    Withholding tax will deduct on services. Hence Material and quantity is not relavent.
    There is no report is available also.
    reg
    Madhu M

  • With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001

    Hi Guru's,
      I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
    "With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
    And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
    Regards
    Maruthi.

    Thanks for all,
      MY problem solved.
    Regards
    Maruthi

  • Customer master with holding tax data

    Hi,
    I am working on customer master transaction 'XD01'. I want add new fields to the existing subscreen 'with holding tax' and new fields in the new subscreen. There is  no enhancement is available for this, but there a BADI 'CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA_CS'. But with this we can not update the data to table KNBW(with holding tax data). Can anybody worked on this type of requirements.
    Thanks in Advance
    Rajavardhana Reddy

    Hi Rajavardhana
    Here there two interfaces you can use for transfering data to database and getting data from database.
    SET_DATA     Data Transfer
    GET_DATA     Transfer Data
    Hope this helps you.
    Cheers
    Manohar

  • With Holding Tax provided in IDOC FIDCC2 is not getting updated in Acc Doc

    Hi All,
    I am Posting a Accounting document in R/3 though Idoc FIDCCP02.
    This idoc has  With holding Tax info segment as E1FIXWT.  i gave all the info in this segment, like Tax code, Tax type , Withholding tax base amount (local currency) , Withholding tax base amount in document currency, Withholding tax amount (in local currencyand Withholding tax amount in document currency
    However, when the Idoc gets posted,and the accounting document gets generated the With holding tab does not get  populated in SAP.
    Please let me know your inputs, that why the woth holding tab is not getting populated with the relevant info from Idoc.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    I have the same issue. But as the idoc is generated in a SAP system of the same release I would have expected that the withholding tax data is already complete. Also are no withholding tax info populated in IT_ACCTX. There only VAT is visible. I suppose IT_ACCWT was meant.
    Anyone any idea?
    Regards
    Stefanie

Maybe you are looking for