Calculation of with holding tax
The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.
Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards.
Similar Messages
-
Calculation of With Holding Tax amount
Hi,
We are using the WHT which has the Minimum amount limit as 700 at the Paying document,
The issue is
there is a Paying document which clears 4 MM Invoices (Documents are coming from MIRO)
2 MM Invoice with less than 700 amount and other 2 MM Invoice with more than 700 amount,
the system is calculating the WHT for only 2 documents which are having amount less that 700 while the payment document is generated.
Can any one please suggest whether the WHT should be calculated for only 2 which have amount more than 700
OR it will get deducted for all the 4 MM as the Total of the paying document is more that 700.
Note : The Accumlation type in the WHT is No accumlation.
Looking for a positive riposte.
Thanks
ManishIt has to calculate for 2 docs more than 700 if you select no accumulation & "Minimum Check" Min base amount check at doc invoice level
-
Reg: Correction of Wrong With holding tax amount Values Posted via BAPI
Hello Experts,
I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully with Wrong With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments ) its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in WITH_ITEM table.....
How am i going to do it..!
Plz..experts help.
Plz waiting for your inputDear All,
this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
I hope this helps.
Mauri -
DOUBT IN CIN (WITH HOLDING TAX TDS)
Payment occured first and Invoice occured afterwards. Now my question how to configure the system for calculation of with holding tax amount.
Hi Prasana,
In the TDS configuration, Define Withholding Tax Types You have to put a tick in the "Per Year, Starting with Month" accumulation type & enter the starting month.
Next in the define witholding tax code you have to put a tick in the box "wtax form" in the calculation Tab.
Next in the define formulas for calculating withholding tax you have to enter the formulas for calculating tax as follows:
To base Amount, Witholding Tax Rate etc. can be maintained.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
AVD. -
India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval
Dear All
Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
(ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
Regards
AnilkumarPlease go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement -
Re: With holding tax is not picking up while excution of RERAPP
Dear team,
While executing the RERAPP.With holding tax is not picked.We are working on 4.7 version.We had suggested a badi to pull the with holding tax field.Still system is not showing any caluculation.Plz advice us if any one of you did the immplimenttation in 4.7 and how you resolved this problem .So that it would be help ful for us too.Please do the need ful.
Regards,
Suma.Dear Sir,
What we did is all the with holding tax data include the basic amount calculations manually in excel there after given the input to the system through accounting interface. You can try with your abaper. Plz make sure that GL code length and currency .This has been done through so much work around. Technical person will guide you .If you still facing the problem where exactly your facing then i can help you out.Please be more clear what you did till now then only i can explain you with clarity.
Regards,
Suma. -
With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term
Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PMDear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15% = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20% = $ 20,000 ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20% = $ 20,000 ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar -
Hi all,
I have an issue relating to with holding tax. wtax code is not picking the percentage ammount while doing the transaction.Please provide the solution.
Regards,
Suma.What r u doing Invoicing or Advance payment. Pls chk in Config whether u have maintained percentage for that particular Tax code
SPRO
Financial Accounting --> Financial Accounting Global Settings -->
Withholding Tax --> Extended Withholding Tax --> Calculation --> Withholding Tax Code --> Define Withholding Tax Codes
And chk in Vendor Master also whether they have maintained any Exemption code or percentage.
If this information is useful. Pls assign Points -
How to calculate with holding tax for the open item
Dera all,
Can you tel me how to simulate with holding tax for the open item? i will try do it using FI_WT_F110_CALCULATE FM but it dosnt work. plz help me
regard
nawaHi Sushil,
can you please elaborate on how you resolved it. we are facing the same issue with BAPI not calculating the withholding tax data.
Thanks,
Sanket -
Populating with holding tax part in WITH_ITEM using RFBIBL00
Hi all,
While handling with hold tax part during FB01 UPLOAD using RFBIBL00- DIRECT INPUT METHOD,i assigned WITHT, WT_WITHCD AND WT_QSSHB values to BWITH,and the tax part gets calculated and updating bseg table, but the tax part is not getting updated in WITH_ITEM TABLE,
can any help me out in this regard, its on high priority.
Regards
sureshFrom the documentation of RFBIBL00:
Extended withholding tax functions:
Only transactions FB01 and FBV1 are supported for the extended withholding tax functions. Direct input is not supported.
The withholding tax data for BWITH must be transferred for every customer/vendor line item. The withholding tax data must come after the BBSEG data. A BWITH structure must be transferred for each withholding tax type.
Rob -
Dear Sir,
I seek the kind help from the experts as , whic is the table to give the following information related to CIN With-holding Tax :
Information is :
Certificate Number / Challan Number / Challan Date
With Thanks and Regards
B MittalHi,
In with holding tax there are two elements :
- Withholding types
- Withholding codes
each withholding type may contain several withholding codes.
In the vendor master record, you assign the with holding type to the vendor, so when you press F4 you get all withholding taxe codes attached to this tax type.
you can display and change this assignement in customizing
Customizing >>>Financial Accounting>>> Financial Accounting Global settings>>>Withholding tax>>>Extended Wihtholoding tax>>>Calculation>>> withholiding Tax Codes>>>Define withholiding Tax Codes
regards -
With holding tax report with material and qty fields
Dear All,
Is there any standard report available with with holding tax data with material and qty fields.
Thanks,
Sekhar.dear Friend,
Withholding tax will deduct on services. Hence Material and quantity is not relavent.
There is no report is available also.
reg
Madhu M -
With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001
Hi Guru's,
I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
"With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
Regards
Maruthi.Thanks for all,
MY problem solved.
Regards
Maruthi -
Customer master with holding tax data
Hi,
I am working on customer master transaction 'XD01'. I want add new fields to the existing subscreen 'with holding tax' and new fields in the new subscreen. There is no enhancement is available for this, but there a BADI 'CUSTOMER_ADD_DATA_CS'. But with this we can not update the data to table KNBW(with holding tax data). Can anybody worked on this type of requirements.
Thanks in Advance
Rajavardhana ReddyHi Rajavardhana
Here there two interfaces you can use for transfering data to database and getting data from database.
SET_DATA Data Transfer
GET_DATA Transfer Data
Hope this helps you.
Cheers
Manohar -
With Holding Tax provided in IDOC FIDCC2 is not getting updated in Acc Doc
Hi All,
I am Posting a Accounting document in R/3 though Idoc FIDCCP02.
This idoc has With holding Tax info segment as E1FIXWT. i gave all the info in this segment, like Tax code, Tax type , Withholding tax base amount (local currency) , Withholding tax base amount in document currency, Withholding tax amount (in local currencyand Withholding tax amount in document currency
However, when the Idoc gets posted,and the accounting document gets generated the With holding tab does not get populated in SAP.
Please let me know your inputs, that why the woth holding tab is not getting populated with the relevant info from Idoc.
Thanks in advanceHi,
I have the same issue. But as the idoc is generated in a SAP system of the same release I would have expected that the withholding tax data is already complete. Also are no withholding tax info populated in IT_ACCTX. There only VAT is visible. I suppose IT_ACCWT was meant.
Anyone any idea?
Regards
Stefanie
Maybe you are looking for
-
After installing Yosemite many of the videos I had in iPhoto won't play at all. All the videos (including missing ones) now have dashes around a thumbnail shape instead of the thumbnails that were there. When I click on the thumbnail shape of any of
-
I had office 2011 installed on my computer without outlook - been working fine. I was given a trial of outlook decided against it at time due to cost - however my server provider fasthost have been offering outlook for free with a busines mail packag
-
Bluetooth mouse and keyboard do not work
I purchased an iMac G5 about 6 months ago. I got it with a bluetooth mouse and keyboard. I have had trouble with it from day 1. Apple had me replace the logic unit, and it worked for a couple of weeks. Then as soon as the 90-day warranty for complime
-
IPhoto 09 Keyword problems.
Hello, I have my images organized with Adobe Lightroom 2, i have added to them keywords, ratings and labels. The problem that i have with iPhoto is that after importing the images to iPhoto some pictures dont have any keywords. I check with Adobe Lig
-
After latest upgrade, iPOD sync VERY SLOW ??
after latest iTunes upgrade, my iPOD classic sync is very slow - new podcasts (5) took over 6 hrs to sync ?? anyone having these issues ?? thx