CalDigit FASTA-4e card in Mac Pro?

Got a Mac Pro a while ago and installed FCP 5.1.2.
I have a dual 2.6 Ghz with 2.5 TB external eSATA RAID,
Kona LHe Card and 8 gig of RAM. We kept getting "Kernal Panic" error message if added RAM up to 4G.
We suspect this may be sonnet SATA card problem, and some online news also point to this direction.
I have read several posts here and barefeats talking CalDigit's FASTA-4e card which already solved the issue. Macguru is selling their card with great performance too.
http://www.caldigit.com/FASTA-4e.asp
http://macgurus.com/productpages/sata/CalDigitFastA-4e.php
any one here has tried CalDigit's FASTA-4e card? any issue with Mac Pro?
I called CalDigit, they told me they already overcame this issue on FASTA-4e card, and FASTA-2e's driver will be released by the end of this month.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Mac Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.8)   G5

I have been using the FASTA-4x card, because I have a PCI-X mac...and it is FAST.
But what Santarosa says it true, thus far the only external SATA RAID card compatible with the mac pro is the CalDigit one.
Why external? Just curious because you have all those drive bays....
Shane

Similar Messages

  • Is it possible to install Nvidia Titan Z card in Mac Pro Mid 2010 ?

    Hello
    I would like to now i if change pci-express power supply cables on mac motherboard from 2x 6pin to 2x8pin would it be possible to install Nvidia Titan Z card in Mac Pro Mid 2010 ?

    September 13th, 2013 -- CRAZY FAST GPUs for Mac Pro:
    GeForce GTX Titan and 780
    July 25th, 2014 -- GeForce GTX 780 6G
    : Mac Pro Tower 'Sweet Spot'?
    January 29th, 2015 -- GeForce GTX 980 vs 9 other GPUs
    running Resolve, LuxMark, and Octane Render
    Mac Pro with GeForce Titan and GTX 780
    Food for thought if you are tight on slots and power feeds. 2. The Titan and GTX 780
    barefeats.com/gputitan.html
    GeForce GTX 780 6G: Mac Pro sweet spot?
    We'll explain after you peruse the graphs. GRAPH LEGEND TITAN Black = GeForce GTX TITAN Black with 6G ... 780 Ti and TITAN Black but costs ... for your existing TITAN or 780.
    barefeats.com/gpuss.html
    2013 Mac Pro 8-Core vs 2010 Mac Pro 8-core
    R9 280X GPU MPt 8c TITAN = 'early 2009' Mac Pro Xeon X5570 @2.93GHz 8-Cores with GeForce TITAN GPU LuxMark 2.1 is an ... Pro were superior to the single TITAN and single R9 280X in all
    barefeats.com/tube11.html
    Games: 6-core 2013 Mac Pro versus 6-core 2010 Mac Pro tower
    Village run collecting average FPS with Titan Performance .
    barefeats.com/tube18.html
    iMac 2013 - Games, gaming, gamer
    We also tested some of the games running the GTX 780 and Titan. .
    barefeats.com/haswel3.html
    Mac Pro 12-core 3.46GHz tower, dual 'FirePro' GPUs
    Anandtech , it rivals the speed of the NVIDIA GTX TITAN at a fraction ... 200.
      barefeats.com/mp12c346.html
    DaVinci Resolve and 2013 Mac Pro
    X compatible GeForce GTX Titan can be purchased from MacVidCards .
    MacVidCards recommends a supplemental power
    barefeats.com/tube10.html

  • ATI 5770 1GB Video Card For Mac Pro dvi hdmi cable

    I am sending video signal over a 50FT HDMI To DVI from my Mac Pro (3,1) via ATI 5770 1GB Video Card For Mac Pro (5.0 GT/s) (181062917108) and I cannot get a constant signal to my TV. The signal stays on for a few seconds or several hours or my TV (Samsung) says there is no signal or I get just a gray static screen.
    I never had a problem before with my previous video card the 512MB nVidia GeForce 8800GT with a 25ft long cable. Any ideas people?

    A cable of about 5 meters (16 ft) can be manufactured to Category 1 specifications easily and inexpensively by using 28 AWG (0.081 mm²) conductors.[114] With better quality construction and materials, including 24 AWG (0.205 mm²) conductors, an HDMI cable can reach lengths of up to 15 meters (49 ft).[114]
    from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDMI
    You may need a higher-quality cable or a lower resolution for your display to make this work without an HDMI Repeater.

  • "fire wire" video capture cards for mac pro

    ....Have Power Mac ver. 10.9.5 system Maverick w/ 4 MB RAM & am trying to locate hardware for:
    acquiring "FIRE WIRE" video capture cards for mac pro.... ? Any suggestions....?(Just purchased Adobe CS 5 premium)

    Your question doesn't make much sense.
    What type of Mac Pro do you have? Is it the new black cylinder or the old style silver tower?
    Firewire is built-in to the old models & the new Mac Pros can use Thunderbolt to Firewire converters to capture from Firewire sources.
    Maybe like this http://store.apple.com/us/product/MD464ZM/A/apple-thunderbolt-to-firewire-adapte r
    Many older cameras used Firewire for capturing, but that has been replaced by other connection types. What are you trying to capture from?

  • Any recommendations for a new Graphics card for Mac Pro?

    Any recommendations for a new Graphics card for mac pro edit in Premiere 2014 and I need to have   output to a monitor my current graphics card is ATI Radeon HD Graphics 5870 1024 MB I find better for what I need?

    Look at this EVGA card for the Mac

  • Are there PCI thunderbolt cards for mac pro 3.1?

    are there PCI thunderbolt cards for mac pro 3.1?

    DCWinton wrote:
    Rick
    It's that last sentence I'm curious about.  "However a MacPro already has much more capability already built in than Thunderbolt can add."
    I'm thinking of getting a Mac Pro, but see that it doesn't seem to have Thunderbolt. I'm not sure if I care. The reason for the Mac Pro is that I'm topping out my 8gb RAM 27" iMac capacity with the volume of work going through it, and my tech tells me I'm pushing it too hard.  I use it to run a small law office, but usually have about 15 apps open, with lots going on in the network in the background.
    Is there any reason to wait until Apple puts Thunderbolt into the Mac Pro?
    Thunderbolt will not increase the performance capability of the MacPro. It will add a bus that can be convenient, especially later on when Thunderbolt devices become more common, more mature and better supported - oh, and with more common will come less costly. From a pure performance standpoint the existing PCIe slots are much more capable and cheaper to implement. You would be giving up nothing with a current MacPro.
    My opinion. Thunderbolt is really a great move forward in the long run - needed something to replace Firewire and this is it. But there is no reason to wait on Thunderbolt on MacPro - it is redundant.
    Rick

  • Which graphics cards are Mac Pro 1,1 (2006) compatible?

    I suspect my graphics card is bad (though I could be wrong).  At boot I hear the Apple sound but get no visuals whatsoever.  No grey or blue or any other kind of screen.  I tried resetting PRAM, holding shift, holding option, nothing works.  The computer is stuck at the phase where the graphics card fan is on overdrive and it does not ever stop spinning.  The card is an ATI Radeon that came stock with the Mac.
    I found this article which shows which cards are compatible. 
    MY QUESTION: Are these the ONLY graphics cards my Mac Pro will support?  Or can I install any PCI-E graphics card?

    User Tip: Mac Pro silver tower (2006-2012) Replacement Graphics cards

  • How fast is the new Mac Pro 8 core comparred to Mac Pro 4 core?

    Hi,
    I consider to update my 1.5 year old Mac Pro 2.66 ghz (4 core) to a Mac Pro 8 core. I use this machine as the center in my studio running Logic 8. I use a lot of V.I. and plugs.
    Can anyone tell me anything about the gain in performance that is possible upgrading to an 8 core?
    Or show me where to find information. MacWorld use to be my resource in that kind of matters, but they never use Logic as a test program.
    Thanks in advance!
    Stigc56
    Musicmind.dk

    Glenn,
    The new Mac Pro will be faster at everything when compared to your older PowerMac, but I think the first 2 items you list will be more dependent upon drive speed.
    1. The FSB and memory are faster in the new Mac Pro, but reading from the CD will only be as fast as the optical drive can handle.
    2. How fast the TIFF file is displayed in the Finder may be more dependent upon the read speed of the hard drive than the processing speed required to create the thumbnail view displayed by the Finder.
    3. Working in CS3 should definitely be faster. Even though you didn't want a response that linked to a test, the following BareFeat test should show how much faster CS3 is on the new Mac Pro.
    http://www.barefeats.com/harper.html
    Keith

  • Graphics Card for Mac Pro 3,1 (Early 2008)

    Hello all,
    I'm finally in the market to purchase a graphics card this faithful sidekick for gaming-related reasons. But, there are a few things I'd like to know before I really get elbow-deep in researching to find the perfect one for the price.
    First, I know the Mac edition GPUs have EFI. Is the sole purpose of EFI to provide the boot screen for the Mac? Surely that's not that big of a loss if I chose to purchase a non-Mac-specific GPU. Furthermore, I hope to keep my old 8800 installed as well. Would there be a way to negate the loss of the boot screen while maintaining the hardware performance for the better GPU?
    Second, it can be difficult to find a comprehensive list of system requirements in some cases. What is the noticeable negative impact I should expect if I chose, say, a Sapphire 7950 ME, which (if I'm not mistaked) mentions requirements of an early/late 2009 Mac Pro? I'm not very knowledgeable of hardware compatibility ratings in general, so any information (no matter how snidely toned) is welcome.
    Thank you
    Bugg

    At 10.8.3 Apple quietly added a whole lot more Drivers for cards not previously seen.
    At the same time, cards that previously did not show a picture AT ALL on a Mac started working (except boot screens). This is said to be due to some research NVIDIA did. They figured out a way to include EFI in the Driver in Mac RAM and make it work as if it were in the card's Firmware.
    Some Users who do not regularly boot back-and-forth to Windows or use diagnostic "snag keys" love their faster cards and claim not to miss Boot Screens. The only ones to complain have been those taken by surprise by the dark screen at Satrtup.
    You are correct that the 7950 MacEdition says it requires a Mac Pro 4,1 2009 or better. The last time I posted that, another user piped up, "it works in my 2008" [but possibly slightly slower due to slightly slower slots].

  • Best graphics card for mac pro 1,1 Intel

    Can anyone tell me the best graphics card to buy for a mac pro 1,1 intel for use with Cinema 4D R12? 
    Many thanks. 

    This is the iMac forum - try the Mac Pro forum for faster response https://discussions.apple.com/community/desktop_computers/mac_pro

  • Fastest Video Card for Mac Pro with Dual-Core Intel Xeon

    Can anyone offer advise on whether I can update the video card in my Mac Pro Dual-Core Intel Xeon computer? I'm pretty sure i can but I have no idea how to upgrade and what to look for in video cards. I do know that I want something fast, hopefully faster than the current ATI Radeon X1900 XT for use with Aperture 3.0. Any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

    5770 in the 2006 Mac Pro
    ATI HD 5770 MC742ZM A

  • Best graphic card for Mac Pro + CS6

    Hi everyone,
    I'm sorry if this question has been asked several times... But it seems technology moves so fast... And also I found lots of cards that seem to me being PC only... That's why I'm having this question for Mac only.
    I'm on a Mac Pro, Snow Leopard CS5.5 , and I want to re-instal a clean new system with Lion and CS6... mostly to edit 5K footage from the Epic (+ VFX and grading)... So it is mostly about PPro and AE (not quite sure about Speed Grad, still have to try it out).
    What are my best options, as of today, in terms of graphic cards... ? I'm talking about boosting the Mercury Playback Engine through CUDA, as well as supporting the softwares as much as it can in term of OpenCL and OpenGL...
    In this chart from nVidia's website, I only see the quadro 4000 and 4800 being available for Mac...
    http://www.nvidia.com/content/PDF/product-comparison/product-comparison-master-revised.pdf
    But we do have a GTX 285 in one of our computer at the office, and it works too...
    Then I know some CS6 users are referring to other cards, like the GTX 570... and there is probably more to the list.
    I'd like to to be able to compare what card gives you the best performances, at which price point.
    Thanks in advance for sharing

    Julien_deka wrote:
    First think strange... I used to run my Wacom Cintiq from a second graphic card - NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 - through mini-dispaly port, and this stoped to work... I have to use another port (DVI) from this same card to have a display on my Cintiq.
    Second thing: I have 4 ports on the GTX570 (2 DVI, 1 HDMI, 1 Dipslay Port)... I plugged my 2 main screens for UI into each DVI but only one worked (the bottom one). For my second screen I had to use the Display Port and use a bunch of adaptors.
    I can't really help you out regarding the GT120 and why the DP went dead.  I suspect it has something to do with the Mac not wanting to power more than 1 DP, but I'm not 100% sure of that.  With the GTX570, only 2 of the ports are going to be active, as you found out: the first DVI and the DP.  It has to do with the EFI on the card and the driver, I believe.  The MacVidCards guy can explain it more thoroughly.  He's fairly responsive via email and PMs on the MacRumors forum.
    I actually bought this card for CUDA performances inside of CS6, so it would be disapointed to realise it's not working...
    EDIT: I think I need to change something in a file to add the name of the card in order to get Premiere use its CUDA technology... I will dig into that a bit more
    Right, you need to edit the CUDA text file and add it in as:
    GeForce GTX 570
    mrfreeze$ cat /Applications/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CS6/Adobe\ Premiere\ Pro\ CS6.app/Contents/cuda_supported_cards.txt
    GeForce GTX 285
    Quadro CX
    Quadro FX 4800
    Quadro 4000
    GeForce GTX 570
    jas

  • Advice about graphics cards for mac pro purchase

    i am considering purchasing a mac pro. i want to keep the cost down, but at the same time i am interested in longevity of the computer. by longevity i mean that as the years move on, the computer does not become "apparently" slow as quickly.
    the mac pro with 2 penryn quad-core processors seems very much the type of computer that will accomplish this.
    so i am now looking at the graphics card choice. i am not into gaming and (at the moment) i don't do a lot of 3D intensive stuff. i do some 3D stuff when visualizing the computer simulations of mathematical equations (e.g. in matlab).
    however, with the longevity thing, i assume over the next 4-6 years applications will become more graphically intensive, webpages will become more graphically intensive, etc ...
    is this reason enough to upgrade from the standard ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT to
    NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT or will i not notice this, even over the course of 5+
    if i were to get the 8800 GT what differences might i notice?

    rob_ART wrote:
    Faster cards may become available in the future but they will cost you much more than the GeForce 8800 GT.
    Are you planning to run dual displays? I've heard there's some problems with the #2 DVI port.
    re: dual displays ... at the moment a single 23" display. however, at some point in the not so immediate future i will either upgrade to a singe 30" or dual 23" displays. thanks for the tip on the dvi port
    re: geforce 8800 ... i am considering some practical logistical and financial issues right now. i was also informed that this video card is on back order for a few weeks. also it can't be installed in an onsite apple store (no sales tax).

  • Pci-e usb 3.0 compatible cards for Mac Pro 2008

    Anyone know a list of compatible USB 3.0 pci-x cards. Unofficial working list is what I am looking for. I have a Mac Pro early 2008 OSX Macverick
    Thanks in advance for the help.

    It  depends. And they are PCIe.
    Sonnet Allegro works fine for me, but apparently not for Drobe.
    CalDigit is popular.
    Do a favor, some cards require 10.8.2 or later so always include your OS.
    www.macsales.com is always a good place to start your looking - if they sell it and they tend to sell what is supported and works.

  • 7970 6gb Vapor video card in Mac Pro 1, 1

    Hello, i recently ordered this card fo rmy Mac Pro (since it works on bootcamp side at least, and support for the Mac side may come soon due to new Mac edition of 7950 being released). My question is, how do i connect the power cables? It comes with 8-pin cables (8-pin to molex 4-pinx2 cables). My Mac has 6-pin connections. So what do i have to do to connect it?do I simnply connect the 6-pin cables into the 8-pin ports on the card? Do I use 6-pin to 8-pin cables? Do i use Molex 4-pin to Sata cables? I also cant figure out how many molex ports my Mac has. I have read of at elast one (for the second optical bay), but i need more than one. Does my Superdrive use a Molex? will i have to unplug my superdrive ? Please help. In the event taht i need to buy a PSU, can you recommend one that is under 70 bucks that would have the connections I need? Thanks
    here is the card I ordered. http://www.sapphiretech.com/presentation/product/?cid=1&gid=3&sgid=1157&pid=1497 &psn=&lid=1&leg=0

    The Mac Pro 1,1 can run 10.8
    That is incorrect.
    EFI emulation is an unstable and temporary option.
    Also, the bandwidth limit is theoritical as current cards cannot max out the bandwidth on 1.0 or 1.1 pci-e.
    Also incorrect.
    It has been proven with a 1,1 that a 5870 provides minimal increases  in performance over the 5770. Compared to 2008+ Mac Pros that see a significant (FAR more than your assumed 2%) increase in the same comparison because of their PCIe 2.0 bus. As you can see here: http://barefeats.com/wst10g3.html
    And here you can see there is very little difference between the 2008-2009-2010 models in performance with the 5870: http://barefeats.com/wst10g2.html
    Why? They have PCIe 2.0 and the 1,1-2,1 have PCIe 1.0 which limits performance. That means the 5770 is the fastest card avaialbe the 1,1 can take full advantage of.

Maybe you are looking for

  • I email popup isn't working nor can I open pages on a new tab using right-click

    I have AOL mail and I view my emails in a pop-up and now I click on the email and nothing happens- I cannot read them. When I am searching for videos or looking at content that is contained in a list I like to open links in a new tab so that I don't

  • Toshiba Mini Netbook Not Booting

    Hi everyone, I'm sorry if this is under the wrong category as this is my first post, but anyways I am having problems starting my Toshiba Mini NB 205 netbook. It was fine until maybe the end of May. What happens is when I turn it on, nothing happens,

  • Variable on CKF

    Hi, I have created a  CKF .for Example  No of days (Z)= Y/X. is is possible to cerate a variable on Z ? i.e. on No Of days? regards

  • Rendering with 'surcodeserver.app' message

    Has anyone tried rendering in premiere pro and receive the message to accept incoming network connections with 'SurCodeServer.app'?

  • Multiple Portlets problem for sessionBean

    Hi all, I created a Master-Detail two page database portlet using sun creator 2 update 1. The portlet was running fine both in test server and my actual portal server. But when i placed it on the same page as another portlet created by me. The portle