Call to arms for BPX ers!

Question

Hi All
I was just wondering, are there any BPX folk left in here or has the forum been taken over completely by the ERP folk ? The same comment goes for the Organisational Change Management thread. : ) 
Actually its kind of interesting to see the community evolve in its own direction but just in case there are BPXers reading this.
C'mon, lets see some BPX content from you!
Have you managed to solve all of the challenges facing organisations when looking to introduce BPX tools such as Visual Composer or ARIS?
How have you introduced a true business process management philosophy within your organisation ?
How do you solve the dilemma of how to integrate organisation Process Models not constructed within ARIS into configuration models contained within Solution manager ?
How do you choose to close WRICEF gaps and make a decision between developing an xAPP or ABAP based development within your ECC box ?
Lets see if we can come up with some good BPX content…..

Answer 1

Atte
When I used the term WRICEF Arun quite rightly clarified what it stood for, unintentionally I had used an acronym that everyone may not have understood. Its been my experience that quite often on SAP (and other business transformation ) projects we use these acronyms and don't always take the time to ensure that;
Business users understand the term clearly in business terms
That the context in which they are used is correct
That it is appropriate to use the term
My intention was to see whether others in the BPX community had ever used the Jargon buster concept within the context of a business change readiness programme to help the business deal with the IS/IT change.
Of course this was a slight side-track from the original intention which was to try to generate some BPX content discussion. Thanks for taking the time to ask the question, hopefully we can generate more discussion from within the BPX community.