Callmanager 3.3(5), H323 gateways not rolling over

Outbound calls are not overflowing from one PRI on one h323 gateway to another. Once all 23 channels are used, I get a busy tone.
I have two h323 gateways. Both are cisco 3725 routers and each has a PRI on it. Each H323 is in theri own route group. And the Route-List contains only these two Route-groups. So it's a pure h323 route-list.
I have tried reversing the order to verify that outbound calls work on both PRI and they do.
I opened a case with cisco and mentioned changing the service parameter of "Stop routing on user busy flag" from true to false. We did that and it's still not working.
Wondering if anyone is having the same experience or have any ideas.

This looks like a pretty old post but this has bitten me once before and there is a fix. In CUCM Service Parameters under Cisco Callmanager Active/ Clusterwide Parameters/Route Plan - Change
"Stop Routing on Unallocated Number Flag" and "Stop Routing on User Busy Flag" to False. This will allow H323 gateways and SIP Trunks to advance to the next Gateway or Trunk in the Route Group/Route List. If it is set to True the backup Gateways and or SIP Trunks will never be used.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

Menu's photoshop buttons not rolling over

Hello all,
I have created some layered buttons in photoshop. All is well, they roll over and work lovely in simulator but when I create a build and open it in the Macintosh DVD player the rollovers dont roll!
What am I doing wrong?
As always thenks in advance
Matt

Repeat after me: DVD is not Flash, DVD is not Flash, DVD is not Flash...
The majority of DVD players don't have the option of rolling over as the majority of DVD players don't have a mouse attached to them.
Layered menus use a behind-the-scenes trick to do their work, involving a series of normal menus connected with auto-activating buttons. However, you wouldn't want buttons to auto-activate with a simple rollover in a software DVD player. Therefore, software players require two clicks for layered menus: one to select (which actually just triggers the auto-activating button and hops to the "selected" menu layer), and another to activate.
Yet another reason not to use layered menus, IMO.

Caller ID not working on H323 Gateway

Hi,
I have a CCM Version 4.1.3 set-up to cater for 200 phones, I have a VG gateway in one of the sites that uses an FXO card for local calls, this VG is set-up as an H323 gateway, however calls coming throguh the PSTN line onto the FXO card and then onto an IP phone are not displaying Caller ID.
Just wondering if anyone has seen this before, I know that on an MGCP gateway the FXO cards don't support Caller-ID but we have it set-up as H323.
Thanks
Paul

Funny, this is a question straight from one of the CCVP tests, although I won't say which one.
Try "caller-id enable" in global mode and "station-id name" on the voice-port.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk653/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800a9a49.shtml

Can not add H323 gateway again

Hi all,
I am doing lab with CUCM 7.1. So, I added one h323 gateway (10.15.242.59) and then I deleted it. Now, I add new h323 gateway (same Ip address 10.15.242.59), one message displays:
"Add failed. One of the required fields on the page has the same value as an entry that already exists in the database. Please check the corresponding Find List page to verify your entry does not exist."
But I also check in route group and gateway list, there are no one which has this IP address.
Thanks,
Thuc

Hi.
You can also check if device still exist in the DB by issuing:
run sql select * from device where name='10.15.242.59'
and see if you obtain some result.
HTH
Regards
Carlo
Please rate all helpful posts
"The more you help the more you learn"

Adding MGCP FXS Ports to H323 Gateways

Currently all of our Gateways are H.323 gateways. Due to a business requirement we are now going to be enforcing our users to use forced authorization codes to place LD calls. In order to facilitate this on our analog phones it seems the only option is to use MGCP gateways.
From what I understand we can run multiple signalling protocols on voice gateways. We have a variety of gateway models but by and large most of these gateways are VG224 models. I think what I would like to do is keep the current h.323 dial-peer and voice-port settings for the PLAR emergency phones that we have on these gateways and only change the analog phones to MGCP.
Most of the route patterns to these h323 gateways look like this... 102[0-5] and then the dial peers on the individual gateways route to the appropriate voice port like this...
dial-peer voice 1020 pots
huntstop
destination-pattern 1002
port 2/21
The Voice port config looks like this...
voice-port 2/21
timeouts interdigit 7
description tie pr 1520
station-id name PTRM 1020
station-id number 1020
caller-id enable
My plan is to create the MGCP Gateways in CUCM as wells as the DN's... in this example x1020. I will then enable MGCP on the gateways. After that my assumption is that I can individually remove the Voice-port and dial-peer configurations and then add the MGCP dial peers with the port and "service MGCPAPP" commands.
My other option is to redo the entire gateway at the same time and schedule after-hours down-times to make the change. I want to avoid this if possible as we have 40+ gateways that need to be changed.
Basically I just need some guidance or confirmation if my plan will work or if there is a better way to do this? Are there any caveats or known issues I should look out for when running multiple signalling protocols on the same gateway?
Thanks,
Trav Moore

Thanks Aaron,
I was wondering about the MGCP ccm-config command but was worried it would re-write the entire h.323 gateway to MGCP. Good to know that it won't and that this is a potential option.
I actually do prefer the idea of only having one signalling protocol (I would like to go all SIP if not for the FAC codes needed). Unfortunately any maintenance that I do that impacts end-users requires a lot of after-hours scheduling and maintenance alerts. These gateways have a combination of fax-machines, PLAR's (emergency phones and overhead paging), and analog phones. Maybe eventually I can migrate all of these ports to MGCP. For now the analog phones are the only ones that must be converted and if I can quickly convert them without anyone noticing aside from the minimal reset in CUCM then this would be ideal.
Thanks!

Problem with H323 gateway

We have a CUCM ver 8.6.2.22900-9.
For our PSTN access we have the following scheme:
CUCM <========> Cisco2911 <======> ISP-------> PSTN
H323 tk SIP tk
Our Cisco2911 is running ver 150-1.M4.
We configure Cisco 2911 as H323 gateway on CUCM, and we established a SIP tk with our ISP.
When we tested incoming calls we received them at router but they are unable to acceess CUCM,
When we tested outgoing calls we got reorder tone and they did not reach our voice gateway.
We run "debug cch323 all" and tested with one incoming and one outgoing call, and we got the out on attached file "debug h323 forum"
CUCM Ip : 10.1.2.2
Router's H323 int: 10.2.2.1
Do you have any idea about the root cause?
Can be an access list problem preventing proper H323 traffic??
Thanks in advanced
Enrique

Do you have voip dial-peers pointing back to your cucm from your gateway? If not then the call wouldn't route onward to the cucm, but the gateway would also ignore communications from that souce because of toll fraud prevention.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/voice/call-routing-dial-plans/112083-tollfraud-ios.html

Gatekeeper showing priority 0 on h323 gateway

Hello,
I have an H323 gateway configured with primary and alternate gatekeepers. Priorities were not configured, so both gatekeepers SHOULD show as 127. However, the first gatekeeper configured shows a priority of 127, the other gatekeeper shows a priority of 0.
I am able to connect to both gatekeepers from the gateway.
I did some research and see that there are some bugs out there on earlier versions which cause the priority to show incorrectly. but i'm wondering if the bug would only be cosmetic (show the priority as incorrect) or if the priority is actually incorrect.
This is happening on multiple gateway / gatekeeper configurations all with the same gatekeeper priority default configuration and showing the same 0 / 127 priorities in the show gateway
I am wondering if the registration failure alerts is due to the priority showing as 0, and if the fix might be to manually configure the gatekeepers' priority.
Has anyone else seen this issue?
H.323 ITU-T Version: 4.0 H323 Stack Version: 0.1
H.323 service is up
Gateway GATEWAY is registered to Gatekeeper GATEKEEPER-PRI
Alias list (CLI configured)
H323-ID GATEWAY
Alias list (last RCF)
H323-ID GATEWAY
H323 resource thresholding is Disabled
Permanent Alternate Gatekeeper List
priority 0 id GATEKEEPER-ALT ipaddr 10.76.155.172 1719 register needed
priority 127 id GATEKEEPER-PRI ipaddr 10.76.155.171 1719 register needed
Primary gatekeeper ID GATEKEEPER-PRI ipaddr 10.76.155.171 1719
Showing alerts in logs:
074975: Mar 14 10:45:51.195 EDT: %CCH323-2-GTWY_REGSTR_FAILED_ALT_GK: Gateway GATEWAY failed attempt to register with Alternate Gatekeeper GATEKEEPER-ALT
074976: Mar 14 10:45:51.251 EDT: %CCH323-6-REGSTR: Gateway GATEWAY registered with Gatekeeper GATEKEEPER-PRI
074994: Mar 14 10:46:06.715 EDT: %CCH323-2-GTWY_REGSTR_FAILED_ALT_GK: Gateway GATEWAY failed attempt to register with Alternate Gatekeeper GATEKEEPER-ALT
074995: Mar 14 10:46:06.771 EDT: %CCH323-6-REGSTR: Gateway GATEWAY registered with Gatekeeper GATEKEEPER-PRI
Configuration:
interface Loopback0
ip address 10.174.102.171 255.255.255.255
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
h323-gateway voip interface
h323-gateway voip id GATEKEEPER-PRI ipaddr 10.176.155.171 1719
h323-gateway voip id GATEKEEPER-ALT ipaddr 10.176.155.172 1719
h323-gateway voip h323-id GATEWAY
h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 700#
h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.174.102.171
Thank you!

BTW - my router is a 3845, IOS version: 12.4(15)T9

Help on set up branch office with 2921 H323 gateway

I setup a new branch office with 2921 H323 gateway and cucm in HQ. When I call a number in remote office, I get dead silence and busy tone. However, user can hear ring at the remote location and able to answer the phone. I was able to talk to him. Any place I need to check?
Question #2, should cucm in HQ handle all calls between HQ and remote office? I tried to call from my VoIP phone to remote office VoIP phone and monitored remote office GW running "debug voip ccapi inout". I saw messages like gateway is handling calls. Is this normal?
I'm fairly new to VoIP environment, still trying to learn. Thanks. Let me know if you need anything to troubleshoot this.

I think that's where I'm confused. I'd like to have CUCM to handle every calls for remote sites. when I searched for the number I'm dialing for remote office, there is a route pattern that covers this number and it points to gateway. This route pattern covers all of their local numbers including our remote office numbers. For example, I have 9.1201456XXXX point to H323 GW. That I got it. However, I want the numbers belong to our office like 1111 don't go to GW for call processing. Do I make sense? I want only their local call to remote office go through GW not our internal call between our offices. I'm sorry if I don't make much sense. Thanks for your help.

H323 Gateway Intermittent MOH Silence

We are using a 3925 router - c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M4.bin - as an H323 gateway with 2 PRI's. We have a PUB and a SUB running -
System version: 8.5.1.11900-21 When we place people on hold we get MOH very intermittently. Out of 10 calls 8 might get MOH and 2 get silence. I have checked codecs (all calls G711), I have restarted IPMediaStreaming. The weird thing is that some calls work and some do not. We cannot isolate any factors to be the same or possible causes. I uploaded the voice portion of the router to see if it helps. Thanks for any help.
Thanks,
Donnie

HEllo,
I had the same issue. Check the BUG ID. My IOS version is 15.0(1)M4 on a Cisco 2911. The affected IOS version described on the Bug ID.
I've made the Option2 Workaround and the issue got solved.
Thanks for the info.
Rui

Inactive component cost not rolled up to top level item

Hi
Our scenario is as follows: we have a top level item with a BOM. And some components of the BOM are having material status u2018inactiveu2019. Inactive means materials will not procured and sold, however we could have inventory which can be consumed in production of other materials. In other words inactive items are like old items. These inactive items already have costing value. And we donu2019t want to recost inactive items.
Having described above scenario, the requirement here is when we run costing for top level item, system should take costing value of inactive items and roll up into top level item costing which is NOT happening now. Client donu2019t want to recost inactive items. The reason for not recosting inactive items is the recosting could change cost of inactive items significantly. We are using 4.7 version and standard costing.
Would appreciate any ideas or suggestions in this regard.
thanx
Sunil

Thanks Young for the reply.
We already set 'do not cost' indicator for inactive components. And these inactive components do have standard costs valid up 10 12/31/2999. It seems bom explosion is excluding these materials. it is ok to exclude. However the existing standard cost of these inactive components did not roll up in to top level. when I checked the costing status log, it says material ABCDF123 in plant 3344 has material status 40: Inactive.
I checked BOM as well and inactive component is flagged as 'relevant for costing'.
We are using following valuation varaiant
Strategy Sequence -> 1. Planned Price 1 2.Standard Cost
Transfer Control - Complete Transfer
thnx

Project professional 2010: Physical % Complete field does not roll-up to the summary tasks

Hi,
I have a project plan which I need to set the physical % complete fields of it in order to use it for earned value over time report. I have assigned costed resources to come of the tasks, set all project task's earned value method to physical % complete,
and finally set a baseline. However, the physical % complete still does not get calculated for the summary tasks! It is always zero!
I have created another project with only 3 tasks and 3 resources, did the same as above, and was able to get calculated values for the physical % complete.
I followed the same procedure in both projects. In one I was able to get the physical % complete value of the summary tasks while it was always zero in the other! What may be the problem?
Regards,
George

Hi Julie,
This is what I am seeing as necessary to make Physical % complete roll up to the summary level task.
BEFORE tasks are entered, set the "Default Task Earned Value method" to Physical % complete. File > Options, Advanced. This will set both the summary and detail tasks to that method.
Add tasks
Add resources with costs.
Assign resources to tasks.
Baseline the file
Take a look at the Tracking table and enter progress in the Physical % complete field for subtasks. The value should roll up.
Sadly I don't know of anyway to force the change after the tasks have been added. You can certainly add the Earned Value Method field to a task view to confirm all is set - but I have never been able to switch mid-flight and get it to work correctly.
I did, however, just try an experiment. I created a file that did not work correctly - Physical % complete was not rolling up. I inserted it into a blank project that had the option set correctly without linking. After a bit of tweaking
(outdenting all tasks to be able to delete the "extra summary task", saving a baseline), it now appears to be working correctly.
I hope this helps.

S_ALR_87013532 report -plan cost not rolling upto the WBS/Project level

Dear All,
Plan cost from production orders is not rolling up to the WBS/Project level in S_ALR_87013532 ( Plan/Actual Variance report).
Where as plan cost from network is properly rolling up to the WBS/Project level in the above report.
Please suggest what could be the reason for this issue. Is any configuration needs to be done for this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

Dear sir,
Thanks for the reply & sorry for late response from my side.
OPSV settings are already maintained in our system.
Some how i realized later that cost are actaully getting rolled to the WBS level, but we have observed one more discrepancy.
Example -
Production order "X" value - 100 ( as seen through co03)
Production order "X"value- 40 ( as seen through report s_alr_87013532).
We found that in report s_alr_87013532 , although my total producton order value of 100 is represented at the WBS /Project level, but at the production order level , it is showing value of 40.
On further analysis we found that for production order X
Materail cost- 60
Labour cost-40
The material cost of 60 is not getting fetched against production order "X" in report " S_ALR_87013532".
There are very few cases , where such discrepancy is seen.
Kindly suggest.
Regards,
Vishal

Roll over balloons in eBay searches not poping up w/ Safari 2.0.4

Is there a setting or a technique to once again allow roll over balloons to pop up on eBay search listings? I'm referring to the "Enlarge" roll over link in the Gallery picture of search results. This is a "paid for" option that some sellers use.
I do not have "Block Pop-up Windows" checked off in the Security Preference window.
Firefox still allows this, but on both a Powerbook G4 and a iMac Dual Core using Safari Version 2.0.4 (419.3) this feature is no longer working for me. (It had worked in Safari until three days ago...could I have inadvertaently changed something?)
For an example of a roll over balloon try searching eBay for an item of interest, and then scan down the resulting list. Typically a few items in large search results will have the "Enlarge" roll over below the gallery picture of an item being sold.
24" iMac 2.16 Dual Core Mac OS X (10.4.8) Also, Powerbook 17" G4 & Powerbook G3

Thanks again.
BTW... I just received this from eBay in regard to my questioning them about this problem. As you said, they seem to be disregarding Safari.
Dear eBay Member,
Thank you for writing eBay in regard to the problem you are experiencing
while trying to list your item using the Safari browser.
If you are using OS X 10.2.x or higher, I would like to suggest using
the Firefox browser. This browser seems to be the most compatible format
for Macintosh users for eBay Picture Services.
If you don't already have this browser installed on your computer,
please visit the following page to download the Firefox browser:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/all
Once the page loads, please select which language you would like to
download, and click on the link under the Mac OS X column.
If you are using OS X 10.2.8 or older, I would then recommend using the
Netscape browser. If you don't have this browser installed on your
computer, please visit the following page:
http://browser.netscape.com/ns8/download/archive72x.jsp
Thank you for being a valuable member of the eBay community. Have an
enjoyable time shopping and selling on eBay!
Sincerely,
Adam
eBay Customer Support
Powerbook 17" G4 & 24" iMac 2.16 Dual Core Mac OS X (10.4.8) Also, Powerbook G3 250 / OS 9

Statement in Transaction Does Not Roll Back

I have a group of MySQL statements in a method of a Java application.
I include an SQL error in the last statement to test the rollback of the transaction.
All the statements roll back, EXCEPT for the one detailed below.
The MySQL table:
     CREATE TABLE Counter (
          number INT( 4 ) NOT NULL DEFAULT 0,
          account_id VARCHAR( 12 ) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY
     ) ENGINE = InnoDB;I have run the staement as a PreparedStatement and a Statement:
PreparedStatement:
     String updateCounterStr =
          " UPDATE Counter " +
               " SET number = number + 1 " +
               " WHERE account_id = ? "
     updateCounter = con.prepareStatement ( updateCounterStr );
          updateCounter.setString( 1, accountID );
          int uc = updateCounter.executeUpdate();     Statement:
     Statement updateCounterStatement = con.createStatement();
          int updatecounter = updateCounterStatement.executeUpdate(
               "UPDATE Counter SET number = number + 1 " +
               "WHERE account_id = \'" + accountID + "\'"
          con.setAutoCommit( true );     //     ------------------------------------ Transaction ENDS
          updateCounterStatement.close();
//               updateCounter.close();
          ... several more
          con.close();
     } catch(SQLException ex) {
          System.err.println("SQLException: " + ex.getMessage());
          if (con != null) {
               try {
                    System.err.print("Transaction is being ");
                    System.err.println("rolled back");
                    con.rollback();     //     < ------------------------------------ con.rollback() HERE
               } catch(SQLException excep) {
                    System.err.print("SQLException: ");
                    System.err.println(excep.getMessage());
}     //     ---------------------------------------- END the methodIn both cases Counter is incremented, but does NOT roll back.
The other statements in the transaction do roll back,
I am using:
mysql Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.18, for apple-darwin8.2.0 (powerpc) using readline 5.0
on Mac OS X 10.4.x
I would greatly appreciate a solution to this problem.
Many thanks in advance

I think autocommit is true by default. Also, it looks like your'e setting it to true, and then executing more SQL.
Explicitly set it to false, and DON'T set it back to trueif there's any chance you're going to want to rollback after that.

Toplink 9.0.4.8 and JTS on OAS 10.1.2.0.0 and 10.1.2.0.2 not rolling back

Re-Posting message with more information.
Toplink 9.0.4.8 and JTS not rolling back transaction
Hi
Scenario:
I have a session bean (EJB1) calling a session bean (EJB2).
When an EJB1 is called, EJB1 persists data on to Table1 in database.
And EJB1 makes multiple calls to EJB2 to create entries in three different tables. Trans-attribute is set as required on both EJBS.
Problem:
EJB1 gets a Runtime Exception while inserting the data into TABLE1 (ORA-12899: value too large for column), EJB1 transaction is rollback, but all other transactions related to EJB2 are getting committed. I assume that they should roll back too.
Also, I did JAD on external transaction controller and listener and noticed that there is a transaction associated to each call. Meaning EJB1 had Transaction T1 and EJB2 had T2, T3, and T4 for the subsequent calls. When EJB1 is getting runtime exception in the method beforeCompletion(), the it calls rollbackGlobalTransaction() which is calling T1.setRollbackonly(). But not on on T2, T3, and T4 rollback
Am I missing anything?
Please help me
Here are my configuration details:
The datasource configuration:
<data-source name="myTxDataSource"
class="com.evermind.sql.OrionCMTDataSource"
location="jdbc/myTxDataSourceCoreDS"
xa-location="jdbc/xa/myTxDataSourceXADS"
ejb-location="jdbc/myTxDataSourceDS"
pooled-location="jdbc/myTxDataSourcePooledDS"
connection-driver="oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver"
username="duser"
password="d123"
url="jdbc:oracle:thin:@localhost:1521:ORCL"
inactivity-timeout="30"
/>
Sessions.xml
<login>
<driver-class>oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver</driver-class>
<connection-url>jdbc:oracle:thin:@localhost:1521:orcl</connection-url>
<datasource>jdbc/DimpleTxDataSourceCoreDS</datasource>
<user-name>duser</user-name>
<encryption-class-name>oracle.toplink.internal.security.JCEEncryptor</encryption-class-name>
<encrypted-password>22F7AFE6F6B9672435537CE1189E123DD62D1A19DF561D1E</encrypted-password>
<uses-native-sequencing>true</uses-native-sequencing>
<uses-external-connection-pool>true</uses-external-connection-pool>
<uses-external-transaction-controller>true</uses-external-transaction-controller>
</login>
<external-transaction-controller-class>oracle.toplink.jts.oracle9i.Oracle9iJTSExternalTransactionController</external-transaction-controller-class>
Toplink Helper class that is used by both EJB's
This one uses SessionBroker. here is how it is initialized:
SessionManager manager = SessionManager.getManager();
sessionBroker = (SessionBroker) manager.getSession(xmlLoader,
sessionBrokerName, this.getClass().getClassLoader());
Oracle9iJTSExternalTransactionController extController = new Oracle9iJTSExternalTransactionController();
sessionBroker.setExternalTransactionController(extController);
It has common following commong methods:
public UnitOfWork getUnitOfWork() {
UnitOfWork uow = sessionBroker.getActiveUnitOfWork();
return uow;
public Object create(Object o)
UnitOfWork uow = getUnitOfWork();
uow.registerNewObject(o);
// added so that the assigned sequence number will be available before the commit happens
uow.assignSequenceNumber(o);
return o;
}

A couple of this appear different in your sessions.xml. To do what you want you need to configure TopLink to:
1. Use an external XT controller - requires flag to be set and controller provided
2. Use the OC4J data source - requires flag to be set and data source name provided
I notice that your sessions.xml has both a data source name as well as a direct connection URL.
Here is a sample that shows the proper settings for the external TX and data source usage:
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<!DOCTYPE toplink-configuration PUBLIC "-//Oracle Corp.//DTD TopLink Sessions 9.0.4//EN" "sessions_9_0_4.dtd">
<toplink-configuration>
   <session>
      <name>default</name>
      <project-xml>META-INF/tlMap1.xml</project-xml>
      <session-type>
         <server-session/>
      </session-type>
      <login>
         <datasource>jdbc/DimpleTxDataSourceCoreDS</datasource>
         <platform-class>oracle.toplink.platform.database.oracle.Oracle10Platform</platform-class>
         <uses-external-connection-pool>true</uses-external-connection-pool>
         <uses-external-transaction-controller>true</uses-external-transaction-controller>
      </login>
      <external-transaction-controller-class>oracle.toplink.jts.oracle9i.Oracle9iJTSExternalTransactionController</external-transaction-controller-class>
      <enable-logging>true</enable-logging>
      <logging-options>
         <print-thread>false</print-thread>
         <print-date>false</print-date>
      </logging-options>
   </session>
</toplink-configuration>Doug

Callmanager 3.3(5), H323 gateways not rolling over

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for