Camera Matching Profiles for the Olympus E-3

Lightroom provides 24 camera matching profiles for Canon, 21 for Nikon, 3 for Pentax and a single one for Leica but not one for any fourthirds camera. Olympus in particular is conspicuous by its abcence.  Might I encourage Adobe to give this serious consideration.  I believe in principle Lightroom to be a superior product to that offered by Olympus but until Adobe shows a willingness to support Olympus many dedicated Olympus users, and dedicated we are, will opt for alternative products.  To dispel and doubts about the level of interest and dedication in fourthirds, you have only to look at the activity on the fourthirds forum http://forum.fourthirdsphoto.com/ .
As an aside, I know many cameras have gone into space but check this out http://www.olympus.com.au/images/stories/pr0902002.pdf . The Olympus E-3 is going to do a tour of duty at the International Space Station later this year. This must count for something.  I would have thought it desirable to be associated with such a camera.
Perhaps I'm wrong and action is already underway to correct the situation.  If so, is there any indication when these profiles might be available?
Bob Trlin

Point taken guys.  There seems to be little interest in LR camera matching profiles in the Oly camp plus a tad of frustration.  They seem to favour a broad mix of products.  I might have to take another look at Olympus Studio 2 myself.  Thanks anyway.

Similar Messages

  • Camera matching profiles for Olympus in PS CS4

    From where will I get the camera profile for my manufacturer (Olympus). I do have ACR 5.7 with Photoshop CS4.   I checked with Olympus, and they said that Adobe creates the camera profiles, not the manufacturers. Please provide some informaiton on it.

    Firstly, you might find more answers in the Camera Raw forum:  http://forums.adobe.com/community/cameraraw
    You don't say what specific Olympus model you have, but Adobe is releasing a new version of Camera Raw very shortly.  Hopefully your model will be supported by that new version.
    -Noel

  • ACR bug = wrong .dcp profiles displayed when Camera Matching profiles deleted

    ACR bug = wrong .dcp profiles displayed when (some) Camera Matching profiles deleted.
    Olympus E-M1
    I deleted some CM profiles from "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Olympus E-M1" (I replaced those w/ modified versions in a proper user folder and I do not want the original profiles to be displayed - too many profiles otherwise in a drop down list) and then all of a sudden some some Nikon CM profiles appeared instead in the drop down list... (no mods to .ORF file, so that can't be the reason)

    ACR bug = wrong .dcp profiles displayed when (some) Camera Matching profiles deleted.
    Olympus E-M1
    I deleted some CM profiles from "C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Olympus E-M1" (I replaced those w/ modified versions in a proper user folder and I do not want the original profiles to be displayed - too many profiles otherwise in a drop down list) and then all of a sudden some some Nikon CM profiles appeared instead in the drop down list... (no mods to .ORF file, so that can't be the reason)

  • Could´nt find a camera profile for the M9.

    I have just bought a Leica M9 but I could not find a camera profile for the M9. In the folder "application support/adobe/camera raw/" there is only a profile for the M8. Do I simply not see the profile or is there none. I am using Lightroom 4.4. and Camerea Raw 7.6. on a Mac.

    It isn’t on the list but it produces DNGs with an embedded camera profile so it wouldn’t need any specific support from Adobe, I don’t think, so maybe they didn’t feel the need. 
    If you download the sample DNGs from KenRockwell, you’ll see an Embedded and an Adobe Standard camera profile, which don’t appear to be different because switching between them produces only the tiniest variation in the histogram.  If something equivalent to Adobe Standard is already embedded in the camera’s DNGs that there wouldn’t be any other Camera-this or Camera-that profiles to match, hence only Adobe Standard is supplied.
    http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m9/sample-photos-3.htm

  • Camera Raw RC 8.6 does not automatically locate the lens profile for the new Canon 16-35mm f4 lens.  The profile is in RC 8.6

    I have loaded Camera Raw RC 8.6.  It can not automatically locate the new Canon 16-35mm f4 lens, although the lens profile can be manually found.

    Hi
    I forgot to answer one question.
    When I have a file from the Canon 16-35mm f4 lens in Camera Raw and go to 
    Lens Correction and check the box Enable Lens Profile Corrections, when I
    select  the model in the first box as Canon, it picks the wrong 16-35mm lens. 
    It  picks the f2.8.  I hope that you can get this fixed in Raw 8.6.  It is 
    a major headache for the user of this new lens.
    In a message dated 7/28/2014 3:10:44 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
    [email protected] writes:
    Camera  Raw RC 8.6 does not automatically locate the lens profile for the
    new  Canon 16-35mm f4 lens.  The profile is in RC 8.6
    created by ccastleb (https://forums.adobe.com/people/ccastleb)  in Adobe 
    Camera Raw - View the full  discussion
    (https://forums.adobe.com/message/6591754#6591754)

  • Question about future Camera Matching Profiles

    Hi all, I am a Nikon D300, Windows Vista user.
    Recently I've been comparing Camera Matching Profiles on ACR and Nikon's own proprietary Profiles on Nikon Capture NX with the same NEF files. What I've found is that Camera Matching Profiles don't match when Saturation is adjusted. If I increase saturation in Capture NX's Picture Control panel, not only saturation is increased but also local hue is shifted. For example, a yellow flower looks slightly reddish when saturation is increased. On the other hand, ACR increases only saturation. I'm not sure I said this appropriately, but you'll know what I'm saying if you compare them side by side. Set the Picture Control sliders all to zero, they match. But once Saturation is adjusted, don't.
    In addition, moving recovery slider, and HSL sliders shifts color in the way that I couldn't expect.
    I'm just curious how the future Camera Matching Profiles will deal with them.

    Thanks Eric. Even though those Camera Matching Profiles match only at default settings, they're really useful to me. I found that beta2 fixed highlight transition problem. I wish I could get that fat lazy Capture NX out of my computer soon.

  • Lens correction profile for the Canon 18-135 STM lens in Lightroom 5 ?

    How or where can I get the lens correction profile for the Canon 18-135 STM lens in Lightroom 5 ? In effect he is not available in my list of correction lens so my lightroom is up to date apparently :/
    Thanks in advance for answer.

    There are two types of Lens profiles - raw and JPEG. It looks like you are trying to process a JPEG image and Adobe has only provided a raw lens profile for the 18-135mm IS STM lens.
    You have four options:
    1) Check for available lens profile using the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader. I checked and a JPEG lens profile is NOT available for the 18-135mm lens.
    2) Follow the procedure outlined by Steve Sprengel in this post:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lr_5_lens_profile_not_applied_for_jp g_captures_only_for_raw_captures
    More detailed instructions here for a Pentax lens example:
    http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/post-processing-articles/176761-creating-adobe-lens-cor rection-profiles-jpgs-raw-ones.html
    This allows using the available raw lens profile with JPEG images. To my knowledge Canon DSLR cameras do not apply distortion correction to JPEG images, so the raw profile should work well. You can check this by shooting raw+JPEG and comparing the two images inside LR
    3) Create you own lens profile using the Adobe Lens Profile Creator. (A complicated process, but it can be done!).
    4) Start shooting in raw mode or raw + JPEG mode, which will allow you to extract the most benefit from LR's processing controls.

  • Lens correction profile for the Canon 18-135 STM lens?

    How or where can I get the lens correction profile for the new Canon STM lenses?

    I see that lens listed in the release notes for the final Lightroom 4.2 update that just came out a few hours ago, so it looks like the answer is to download the update.
    http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2012/10/lightroom-4-2-now-available.html

  • Which Camera Calibration Profile for Leica M8 with LR3?

    I see there are 4 camera profiles for the Leica M8 that all produce significantly different results - ACR3.6 and 4.4 and Adobe Standard and Camera Standard. Any advice on which to use and when?
    Thanks in advance.

    ACR 3.6 (this is the Adobe standard profile) when support was first introduced.
    ACR 4.4 (with this version of ACR) Adobe created an updated standard profile.
    Adobe standard, this is the latest profile introduced during ACR 5.x, just a new naming method
    Camera standard, this is a profile created by Adobe to simulate the profile by the M8 to produce in camera jpegs.
    Use the one that pleases you most, as a starting point then create your own presets to make further adjustments.

  • Camera Raw Profile for Nikon P7800

    Adobe Bridge CC
    Camera Raw CC
    Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
    In Camera Raw, using a Nikon P7800 created NRW raw file.
    Camera Calibration | Camera Profile
    Only Matrix is available.
    In Camera Raw, using a Canon G16 created CR2 raw file.
    Camera Calibration | Camera Profile
    Adobe Standard
    Camera Standard
    Camera Faithful
    Camera Landscape
    Camera Neutral
    Camera Portrait
    Why does the Nikon NRW raw file only have Matrix as a Camera Profile
    while the Canon CR2 raw file has 6 different Camera Profiles?
    Thanks in advance.

    I reported the lack of Adobe Standard or any other Camera profiles for the P7800, 3 months ago and nothing changed with the final release of ACR 8.4 or LR 5.4, but perhaps by that time, new-camera support for ACR 8.4 and LR 5.4 had already been determined, but if it's not in ACR 8.5/LR 5.5 then someone has dropped the ball:
    http://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/nikon_coolpix_p7800_only_has_a_matri x_camera_profile_in_lr_5_3_and_acr_8_4_rc

  • When will Lightroom have a profile for the Parrot Bebop Drone for lens correction?

    Just wondering if and when Lightroom will add a lens correction profile for the Parrot Bebop Drone.

    The Parrot Bebop Drone camera and lens is not likely to be supported by Adobe.
    https://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/multi/lens-profile-support-lightroom-4.html
    It appears to use a fisheye lens and in-camera processing or provided software to rectilinear "correct" the image. What specifically are you trying to correct with the LR Lens Profile tool? This will help us provide other suggestions to accomplish your objectives.

  • Hi there, when will there be a support for the Olympus PEN E-PL7?

    Hi there, when will there be a support for the Olympus PEN E-PL7?

    It is on our radar and hoping to add it in an upcoming update.
    As soon as it is available, it will be updated in the below article. Camera Raw plug-in | Supported cameras
    ~ Arpit

  • When will there be a profile for the Hasselblad HCD 24mm?

    Does anyone have an idea when we'll see a lens profile for the Hasselblad HCD 24mm both for the Hasselblad and the Leica S?
    Thanks.

    I understand, my post was probably inappropriate considering I could not even afford the lens or the camera that it was designed for.
    I just thought that for a prime lens at a fixed focal length, of the quality one would expect, for the price would not need help from a $150 software package. I once saw a post in a hotel elevator "How sad to have a Champagne taste with a Beer income".
    Does the manufacturer supply the necessary correction info for third party raw conversion software to make appropriate correction.

  • Lens profile for the Tokina 11-16 2.8

    How do I and the profile for the Tokina 11-16 2.8 Lens?

    The list of lens profiles is filtered according to the file type of the image you are currently working on. Many profiles are made for correcting camera Raw images, and will not be available for camera JPG.
    In principle, different profiles should be used - and for example, the LR Raw support for some cameras does perform "silent" lens correction during conversion, in which case this distinction makes sense.
    However there is a workaround: by saving a copy of the lens profile and editing that in a text editor to change its "CameraRawProfile" designation from "True" to "False" - this new copy will then appear in the list, and apply corrections, for a non-Raw image.
    This kludge may not be technically ideal, but I have found it works fine.

  • Lens Profiles for the Fuji X-E2 and the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader

    I just picked up an Fujifilm X-E2 and an 18mm f/2 lens.  I noticed that LR 5.4 doesn't have a profile for this lens/body combination and I'm a little unclear whether it is applied automatically (as was the case with the X100s prior to 5.4), or not.
    I also noticed that I can download profiles for the X-E1/18mm combination using the Adobe Lens Profile Downloader and wondered if this was a correct thing to do. 
    Thank you,
    Robert

    A couple things:
    1)  ACR 8.4 will show if a built-in profile has been applied and what corrections have been applied, so if you want to post a raw file from your camera and lens combination someone with PS / ACR 8.4 can give feedback about what built-in profiles might be doing.
    2)  Regarding the X100S, using ACR 8.4 RC, for an example image I downloaded, the built-in profile corrected Chromatic Aberration and Vignetting.  The Adobe-supplied external profile corrected Vignetting and Geometric Distortion.  So the Adobe-supplied profile does additional Geometric Distoration compared with the built-in profile.  However, there was double-correction for Vignetting so one has to turn off the vignetting correction for the particular lens profile to avoid double-correction.  Here is a side-by-side example showing these corrections:
    This double-correction of vignetting appears to be have been corrected in the final ACR 8.4 and presumably LR 5.4.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Getting Strange Error Running Query After Partioning Cube

    I am using BI 7.0, Service Pack 11: I just partitioned a cube. I hav eorginal cube XFI_C001 and create a new cube C2_XFIC01 by copying from XFI_C001. Now I developed a query on C2_XFIC01. Similar query on XFI_C001 does not give any error. How can I d

  • Error messages when trying to make selection

    Hi, I am new at Photoshop, I use CS6, and today I followed a tutorial on how to make a robot on a picture and at first everything went ok but when I was almost done and tried to make a selection with the lasso tool I all of a sudden got an error mess

  • Search for a record from Access Database, and populate records in Drop Down List, and View It

    Hi, I created a PDF form where I have open, next, previous buttons, and I'm able to connect to the access database, and it's working fine. Now, I want to be able to search by last name from the access database, and retrieve the results in a dropdown

  • Oracle Database Support on Twitter and Facebook

    Stay current on the latest Oracle Database Support news and events including important product announcements, alerts, updates, new releases, and patches. Follow us on Twitter https://twitter.com/OracleDBsupport Like our Facebook page https://www.face

  • Poor performance of WLS 6.1

    We have converted our application from WLS 5.1 to WLS 6.1. There is no real code changes except the changes required for the deployment model in WLS 6.1 (WAR and EAR). And we put the WLS 6.1 for the performance testing using the Load Runner and found