Camera profile for Panasonic DMC - LX7 ?

Hi ! Where could I find camera profile for my new (ld) Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX7 ?
Any help welcome !

You can create your own profile or search the community to see if one has been created for your camera by somebody else.
See this blog link:
http://blogs.adobe.com/jkost/tag/the-adobe-lens-profile-creator-tool

Similar Messages

Could´nt find a camera profile for the M9.

I have just bought a Leica M9 but I could not find a camera profile for the M9. In the folder "application support/adobe/camera raw/" there is only a profile for the M8. Do I simply not see the profile or is there none. I am using Lightroom 4.4. and Camerea Raw 7.6. on a Mac.

It isn’t on the list but it produces DNGs with an embedded camera profile so it wouldn’t need any specific support from Adobe, I don’t think, so maybe they didn’t feel the need.
If you download the sample DNGs from KenRockwell, you’ll see an Embedded and an Adobe Standard camera profile, which don’t appear to be different because switching between them produces only the tiniest variation in the histogram. If something equivalent to Adobe Standard is already embedded in the camera’s DNGs that there wouldn’t be any other Camera-this or Camera-that profiles to match, hence only Adobe Standard is supplied.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/leica/m9/sample-photos-3.htm

Current Lightroom / Camera Raw Camera Profile for Sony ILCE-6000 inaccurate: green cast in shadows! Capture one better! Please fix it!

Hi folks from Adobe!
Please take note that the current Lightroom / Adobe Camera Raw Camera Profile for the Sony ILCE-6000 is very inaccurate: There is a serious green cast in the shadows!
Capture One Express for Sony (which is free by the way) renders a lot more correctly!
Please correct this, since I'd rather buy the coming LR6 because of keeping my established workflow instead of going the Capture One route.
A good example can be found in the dpreview forum "LR5 A6K shadow pulling, a mess! Adobe LR is broken? "
Or search for Philp Reeves 3 weeks with the Sony A6000 review "3 Wochen mit der a6000", where he compares it to the Sony A7, using both times Lightroom to push the shadows.
The Sony A7 is fine where earth looks like brown earth, the A6000 picture looks like grass instead.
Please fix this! This is a high volume camera frequently bought by enthusiast or as second body for FF photographers. That would be really great!

I am talking about the two raw files linked in the very last post of page 6 of the Reeves comparison thread, not JPGs or screenshots of unknown manipulation. In LR they both say f/11 and ISO 100 and have a similar tone, but one is shot at twice the shutter speed as the other. This side-by-side is using Adobe Factory Defaults for each image where the profile is Adobe Standard, the toning sliders are all 0, tone-curve linear, and the Sharpening and Color NR are 25:
However, when I look at the camera-embedded JPGs, side-by-side, the 1/80th image on the left is darker than the 1/40th image on the right, as expected given the reported shutter-speed difference:
And it is indeed the darker image that has more shadow problems, also as expected.
When I do manipulate the darker (a6000) raw file in LR, I do see that the shadows are greenish when brightened unlike most other cameras which usually show magenta, which is the combination of the blue and red sensors showing more noise because there are half-as-many photosites as compared to the green, so I am seeing what people are complaining about and would expect shadow noise to be purple not green, I'm more concerned that these two example raws aren't actually comparable due to apparent differences in exposure. It is also odd that the lens listed in LR is different than the lens listed in the filename, so either someone has mistakenly or deliberately renamed the file wrong or someone or something has changed the EXIF parameters that LR is reporting to be the same when they're really not.

Where/how to obtain camera profiles for Adobe Camera Raw 7.3?

Where can you get camera profiles for ACR? And how do you load them into ACR? Is the Sony A77 on that list? Need help on this one. Thanks.

Adobe Standard is the only camera profile available for your camera, then, if that’s all you see.
Adobe only makes the so-called “camera-match” profiles, with names like Camera Standard, Camera Portrait, Camera Faithful, etc, for Canon and Nikon and a select few others. I suspect there is a lot of work involved in these and they don’t do it for cameras they see as less popular or less used.
They wouldn’t be the same as the Camera-Match profiles from Adobe but you can create your own proilfes with an X-Rite 24-patch ColorChecker Classic and the Adobe DNG Profile Editor or using the X-Rite ColorChecker Passport package:
http://xritephoto.com/ph_product_overview.aspx?ID=1257

Camera profiles for Sony A700

Hi,
I'm working in CS4 (Mac) and I downloaded the latest camera raw 5.6. I have only the Adobe standard, ACR 4.4 and ACR 3.5 in the Camera Calibration -Camera Profile.
I don't see special camera profiles for my Sony A700. In tutorials they showed profiles for Canon or Nikon. How can I get the profiles for the A700? Do they exist?
Thanks a lot
Claudine

Hi Claudine,
At the moment these are the only profiles made by Adobe for the A700. You can build your own profiles (or edit existing profiles) using the free DNG Profile Editor, if you wish. Another solution for a custom profile is the ColorChecker Passport, from X-Rite.
Eric

"Embedded" camera profile for .dng file?

Why does Lightroom 5 show "embedded" as an option for camera profile for .dng files created by my pentax k-30? I thought that "embedded" profiles did not apply to .dng files?

A JPG can contain color profile data not just a reference tag containing the name, although other Google results indicate that the APP2 segment is only has 65533 bytes of data and if the profile is too large for that then it is either chunked somehow or written into an XMP segment:
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/javax/imageio/metadata/doc-files/jpeg_metadata.ht ml#color
“If the ColorSpace of the image is based on a non-standard ICC Profile, then that profile is embedded in an APP2 marker segment. If the ColorSpace is not based on a non-standard ICC Profile, but an app2ICC node appears in the metadata, then an APP2 marker segment is written with the appropriate standard profile. Note that the profile must specify an RGB color space, as the file must be JFIF compliant.”
EXIFtool can extract and embed a profile:
http://cpanforum.com/threads/2873

Where do you put DNG camera profile for light room?

I just received my Leica M9 and downloaded from chromasoft a camera profile for the M9. it is a .dcp file but I can not find where to use it.
Adolfo

Dependent on OS. On Windows vista the usual location is Users\username\AppData\Roaming\Adobe\CamerRaw\CameraProfiles .
Or you can place it directly in the folder where the Adobe profiles are located, usually Users\All Users\Adobe\CamerRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera|Leica M9
on OSx /Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/CameraProfiles
The actual profile is used via the calibration setting in the develop module.

Camera Profiles/ Camera Raw 5.2 for Panasonic DMC-G1

I installed the Camera Raw update in Elements 7 and also ran the Camera Profiles executable in C:\program files\adobe|photoshop 7\plug-ins\file formats. When I open the raw image, I see "Camera Raw 5.2 - Panasonic DMC-G1" in the upper left hand corner. Now if I click on the Camera Calibration tab and look at the Camera Profile Name drop-down, I only see Adobe Standard. Does this mean the DMC-G1 is not supported yet or is there something wrong?

Lest there be any confusion, Jao is talking about ACR profiles that are tailored to the several shooting modes of some cameras. The DMC-G1 is definitely suppported within ACR 5.2, but only with one profile, the Adobe Standard for that camera. I went to the folder containing the standard profiles, and the DMC-G1 was one of them.
Richard Southworth

How does Adobe make their camera profiles for ACR and Lightroom?

I'm not interested in the proprietary algorithms , but I am curious as to the photographic mechanics and hardware tools used by Adobe to make the various camera profiles as they differ markedly from the ones I make using the DNG Profile Editor.
My methodology is to set an X-Rite 24 patch Color Checker target, light it evenly with electromic flash (with 0.1 stops from center to corners as mesured with a Sekonic L-758r Meter) and make a series of exposures bracketed in third of a stop increments around the meter reading in case the camera sensitivity differs from the meter's.
I then process the raw files and convert them to the DNG format, select the best exposure and run it through the DNG Profile editor. My results differ from Adobe's generic profiles for that camera enough that that I don't thin kthe difference can be credited to the difference between a generic profile a specific camera.
How do the different tools work in the DNG converter? Starting with the Options for "Base Tone Curve"? Is there a document a moderately color geeky person can understand that explains this?
I thin kthe DNG Profile editor is a great and under usedtool. I wish more people knew about it.
Thank you for your time and consideration.

Someone who only eats sausage may not want to know how it's made. Someone who creates things with food, a chef, a cook, or otherwise is thinking about a career in the food industry, might have a interest in such things. Someone who is thinking of making sausage will want to know all the details. Someone who is concerned with the public safety might want to know how sasauge is made.
It would be nice for a sausage maker to give some hints about the process as compared to what each of us can do with the DNG Profile Editor and to the original poster's question, why are our profiles different from Adobe's?
It is my experience that when I create a profile with the DNG Profile Editor, and then compute the color error for each of the 24 color patches of a CC24, using a program like Imatest, some colors are quite a bit off and some are very close, and the colors that are off, are not the same ones that are off when I compute the color error using one of the Adobe Standard or Camera Standard profiles.
Is Adobe using more detailed and sophisticated color targets with hundreds of different colors, or if not, do the tools provide more feedback and allow more manual manipulation of the profile and so the differences are due to their judgement about which colors to make "right" and which ones to let have more error associated with them, that can be manipulated by hand instead of merely letting the DNG Profile Editor apparently distribute the error amongst the various colors with some sort of even-handed calculation.
For example it is easy to imagine that someone tweaking a profile by hand with a live readout of the error of each of the colors plus an overall composite error, might put more emphasis on skin tones being right if they have a background in people photography, or more emphasis on bright colors being right if their experience is in textiles and the current trend in the US is bright colors--and a different emphasis when the trend is muted colors so there is cultrual bias and life-experience coloring a "standard" profile.
In other words, how much of the difference between Adobe and our profiles are due to Adobe having different or better science, and how much of it is due to Adobe have different or better "artists" who decide what colors to make correct compared to others.

Is there a camera profile for Nikon D80 available for Photoshop/Lightroom CC

I am new to Lightroom and Photoshop. After watching a few YouTube instructional video's for Lighroom I looked for my Lens (Nikon 18-135 Zoom) but could not see one. One video suggested looking in Photoshop, there I can find the lens but not my camera. Several video's talk about downloading profiles from the internet, is there a place to do this for either?
Is a camera profile even used in Lightroom ?

Thanks, this workaround works:
I copied appropriate lens profile from (the .lcp file)
/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfiles/1.0
to:
/Users/<my username>/Library/Application Support/Adobe/CameraRaw/LensProfiles

Loading Camera Profiles for ACR

Hello All, I downloaded the camera profiles from Labs.Adobe.com, ran the setup which looks like it put the data in the "Settings" folder under the "Camera RAW" folder.
When I go to Camera RAW and select Camera Profiles then Load, a dialog box opens looking for camera raw settings.xmp in the settings folder, however, the folder is empty.
Where did I go wrong?
Thanks for any help,
Jan

Captain1854 wrote:
Where did I go wrong?
First off, you need to post what version of Photoshop and Camera Raw you are using. Second, while you can indeed download the old "beta" DNG profiles, you may as well forget those and download the final shipping version which is part of the package for installing DNG Converter 5.3. Go to the DNG Product Page and download the 5.3 version-the DNG Profiles (the final release versions) are part of that install See: DNG Product Page
Then I think you are confused on how to use the profiles...when properly installed and using Camera Raw 4.6 in CS3 or at least 5.2 in CS4, the DNG Profiles will show up under the Camera Calibration panel...only when loading a raw file–there are no profiles for JPEGS. Also, the number of profiles and their names will vary by camera. You can _NOT_ load profiles into Camera Raw from within Camera Raw...if you are using the flyout menu at the side, that's the wrong way of using them.
You really need to do some reading...see the docs on Labs at the DNG PROFILES page scroll down and read the Getting Started section. If you want further help, post your system, ACR version and camera...

No camera profiles for D90 and D80 files in ACR 8.3?

Hello,
I recently bought in to Adobe's Creative Cloud and downloaded the latest version of Photoshop and ACR. I love the new process and everything about the new Photoshop, however, when I went to re-edit some older images taken with a Nikon D80 and D90, there were no profiles to be found under the camera calibration tab. What gives? My only option for D90 files is "ACR 4.6" and "ACR 4.4 and 3.6" for the D80 files. Where are all the rest? What am I missing? What's strange is that they are all there in Lightroom. I hate Lightroom, though, and would prefer to continue working within ACR if possible.
Thanks a ton for any insight.

Here is what I have for D90 camera profiles in the Camera\Nikon D90 and Adobe Standard folders under ProgramData with PS-CC and ACR 8.3 installed:
C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Nikon D90>dir
Volume in drive C is C - Boot
Volume Serial Number is 26BE-4B1F
Directory of C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Camera\Nikon D90
01/11/2014 02:51 PM    <DIR>          .
01/11/2014 02:51 PM    <DIR>          ..
03/18/2013 11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 1.dcp
03/18/2013 11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 2.dcp
03/18/2013 11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera D2X Mode 3.dcp
03/18/2013 11:32 AM           112,100 Nikon D90 Camera Landscape.dcp
03/18/2013 11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Neutral.dcp
03/18/2013 11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Portrait.dcp
03/18/2013 11:32 AM           112,098 Nikon D90 Camera Standard.dcp
03/18/2013 11:32 AM           112,096 Nikon D90 Camera Vivid.dcp
               8 File(s)        896,790 bytes
C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Adobe Standard>dir *D90*
Volume in drive C is C - Boot
Volume Serial Number is 26BE-4B1F
Directory of C:\ProgramData\Adobe\CameraRaw\CameraProfiles\Adobe Standard
03/18/2013 11:32 AM            55,838 Nikon D90 Adobe Standard.dcp
               1 File(s)         55,838 bytes
I believe these profiles can also come from installing the DNG Converter 8.3, so if the profiles don't seem to exist, then try downloading and installing the DNGC 8.3 from:
http://www.adobe.com/downloads/updates

3.3 RC - need camera profile for Nikon D7000?

I'm kind of a knucklehead about Adobe so please be patient with me....
I have a Nikon D7000 (not a D700). Downloaded 3.3 RC and can edit my RAW pics - works for me.
But there are no profiles in the camera calibration. What am I missing ? Is it a Camera Raw update?
Maybe one of you folks can explain this to me.
Thanks, Michael.

No, Lightroom does not use the ACR plug-in. The camera profiles are part of the Lightroom installation. I don't have a D7000, but I recall reading in another thread that there was an Adobe Standard profile available. My guess is that this is preliminary support until the other regular profiles can be created. I might be wrong.

Camera profiles for Nikon D810 reveal posterization

The following profiles included with LR 5.6 & ACR 8.6 reveal noticeable posterization with the Nikon D810 RAW files.
Camera Standard
Camera Landscape
Camera Vivid
Camera Monochrome
For more details, there's a large discussion of the issue on DPReview.com, here
Additionally, shadow detail recovery in LR & ACR is less useable with the D810 RAW files. I am forced to use Nikon's Capture NX-D for better shadow recovery with accurate camera profiles, which significantly slows my workflow, as I prefer to do all imports and edits through LR & Photoshop overall.
As a point of reference, LR & ACR's handling of D800E RAW files is wonderful; however the D810 RAW handling is not quite there yet. On the D800E RAW, I'm able to move the shadow slider significantly, revealing more detail with no compromise to image quality. On the contrary, shadow recovery in the D810, using LR 5.6 & ACR 8.6, is less forgiving; increasing the slider will sometimes affect other elements of the image, producing a less pleasing result.
It would be be greatly appreciated if Adobe could address these issues in an upcoming update.
Thanks,
Rumi

It is possible that the shadow recovery problems are profile-related and Adobe redoing them might fix both problems, but if all Adobe-supplied profiles have the same issue rather than just the subset that also has posterization problems, then I’d suggest you make a separate post about the shadow recovery issue, including screenshots of what you see and example NEFs from the D800 and D810 taken in similar conditions for others to download and replicate the issue with.
That NX-D does something preferable to LR is probably not a good enough reason for Adobe to care, because the Adobe raw engine is not the same as the Nikon raw engine, as both are proprietary products known only to their respective manufacturers, so comparisons between Adobe handling of the same scene in different cameras were one is clearly bad, might have a better chance of being taken seriously.

Camera profiles for Canon 7D?

IN LR 3.2 I get no profiles specifially for the 7D. No camera vivid option, for example. Is this because Adobe isn't yet supporting this model?

Read what I said. There are separate colour profile for every camera. If you want to check then visit the folder I posted. In LR these profiles show up dependent on the camera that created the file. If you create other profiles for a specific camera these will also show. Profiles that are not for the camera will not show as an option in LR.
LR knows which camera made the file and loads the full set of available profiles for that camera. In the case of the 7D these are called stuff like Landscape, Vivid, etc., based on the names for various styles that the camera can produce with jpgs. Other cameras may have different naming conventions and many camera will only have an Adobe Standard profile, which will be named as such with the number that relates to the version of ACR which was in use when they were first created. So for your camera, if the profiles are installed, you should be able to choose between Adobe Standard, Vivid etc., all individual proifle for the 7 D which will not show up for any other camera unless you visit the actual folder where they are located as I previously posted.

Camera profile for Panasonic DMC - LX7 ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for