Camera Profiles with Older Lightroom Version

Using an older version (LR 2.7) on an older Mac G5. Would like to download the camera profiles for my Canon cameras (1Ds MK2, G12) from Adobe but can't find them on line. Since this version is old, do compatible profiles still exist? If so, where might I find them?

You cannot add camera support for newer cameras to an older version of LR by merely downloading profiles.
You have to either update the LR to a version that is newer than your camera or use the DNG Converter that is new enough to create DNGs from the raw files and then those DNGs have enough information for an older version of LR to support them.  The issue you’d have is that the DNG Converter probably only runs on the newer OS as well, so you’ll have to find another computer to convert the files with.

Similar Messages

  • I would like to use tethering for my camera Nikon D610 in lightroom (version 5.4 is installed). When will lightroom support this camera with tethering?

    I would like to use tethering for my camera Nikon D610 in lightroom (version 5.4 is installed). When will lightroom support this camera with tethering?

    We'll know when it happens, Lucht - software companies don't make support promises in advance.

  • Camera profiles with .tiff files

    I have a camera not (really) supported directly by LR - so i use .tiff files created by the camera bundled software.
    This works fine, and i have earlier had help from this forum regarding lens-profiles using .tiff files, with great success.
    Now i would like to be able to use my own camera profiles with LR with my .tiff files - when i open the RAW files (an old version is supported, so they can be opened) the profiles are availiable as expected, but when i change to the .tiff version of the file, the profiles are gone.
    What can i do?
    Best regards
    Henrik - Denmark

    In the Camera Calibration tab the only profiles that will be available are for RAW files. Tiff and Jpeg files are already rendered and you will only see "embedded". When you shoot in raw mode applying profiles and adjusting white balance are major benefits in post processing, both are already baked into files rendered by the camera. Or in your case by the camera manufacturers software.
    Maybe your camera is supported by a newer version of Lightroom. What version of LR are you using and camera model?

  • How can i create a camera profile with camera raw?

    Hi
    how can i create a camera profile with camera raw without x-rite or other third software?
    i have a Colour Checker ,with different shade of gray and different colors
    i remember about a script or something like that
    i google a lot , but without luck
    can i create my camera raw profile using a color checker with photoshop acr ?
    i'm not sure but this should be the script http://simon.tindemans.eu/tools/acrcalibrator , right?
    but i don't know how use it
    is there a tutorial ? maybe a video to create a profile with camera raw
    thanks
    greetings

    Hello, I think that you search for https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs%5Fdngprofileeditor
    Here is a PDF from adobe about it: http://wwwimages.adobe.com/www.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/photoshop/pdfs/cs6/ DNGProfile_EditorDocumentation.pdf
    And an article: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/accessories/dng-profiles.shtml

  • How to make my form be compatible with older adobe versions

    Hello,
    I created a dynamic form with adobe lifecycle 9. As users try to use the form, they get this error:
    "This PDF form requires a more recent version of Adobe® Reader® or Adobe Acrobat® software. While this form may appear to be working, some elements may not function correctly or may not appear at all."
    Is there a way to make the form be compatible with older adobe versions?
    Thanks.

    In the File Menu -> Form Properties under Default Tab, choose the Target Version of Adobe Reader that you expect users to have the minimum version.
    If any of the functionality does not compatible with the selected version, then the warnings will be displayed under report tab. You can access it by going to Window menu -> Report.
    Thanks
    Srini

  • Latest Update: New Camera Profiles for the D700 (Version 4)

    I see with the latest update of Lightroom brought with it version 4 of the camera profiles.  I've dabbled with using several of them, especially the Camera Portrait.  I have versions that consist of for example:
    Camera Portrait
    Camera Portrait beta 2
    Camera Portrait v3
    Camera Portrait v4
    Of course, the previous versions can be left as is however the list I have now is quite long and wanted to know if I would be missing out if I were to discard/delete previous versions and just keep the v4's.
    I realize this is personal preference however are the newest versions (version 4) for Camera D2X, Camera Landsape, Camera Neutral, Camera Portrait, Camera Standard and Camera Vivid for the D700 all one needs for the average Lightroom user?
    Thanks in advance.

    Thank you all for giving me your advice.  Like kbkbn said, the older versions don't do anything by being there and you never know if you want to use one of them in the future.  I will start using the version 4 profiles and compare them more to the older versions.  Thanks again.
    Are there any other worthwhile sources of profiles?  I do have a few I created myself with my Color Checker Passport for specific shooting locations in my yard for specific times of days.
    Thanks again.

  • Camera Profiles with a Nikon D5200

    As from my other threads today, I'm just learning Lightroom and trying to figure things out. 
    I am shooting with a D5200 and am able to import the raw (NEF) files into Lightroom just fine.  I'm thinking that my "Camera Profile" is not being applied to the files correctly because they look really different compared to the JPEG's that are shot.  I've tried to go into the "Developer" section and change the "Camera Profile" around from something other than Adobe Standard, but the colors still don't look right.
    How do I know which Camera Profile is being applied to the raw photos if the only thing that Lightroom shows is a generic "Adobe Standard", "Camera Standard", Vivid, etc.
    Thanks!

    Just to be clear, Lightroom does NOT choose ANY profile for raw images from ANY camera. YOU have to choose the profile that you want. Lightroom cannot/does not read that information from the file. Lightroom does NOT use the camera model number as criteria for which profile to use. YOU make that choice. If you find that you use one profile more than others, YOU can change your default settings for your camera to use that profile as a starting point. The profiles provided by Adobe are designed to emulate the camera settings. But they are not intended to be something to use for ultimate results. They are a starting point from which you make other adjustments to get the results you are looking for.
    When shooting raw/JPEG the JPEG images may look warmer because they are affected by the in-camera processing. If you find that you consistently need to make your images warmer, make that adjustment along with other adjustments that you want to be standard or automatic, and then make them part of your default settings by saving new default settings.
    The default settings which you determine should provide you with a generally acceptable starting point for most of your images. However, you should expect to make individual adjustments as required to get the results you are looking for.
    After reading my response I realize I need to make one clarification. Lightroom DOES look at the camera make and model and then allows you to choose from the profiles that were created for that camera. However Lightroom does not choose a profile by itself. While it's true that Adobe Standard is the profile that seems to be the "default" profile, that can be changed to match your shooting style.
    If you decide to set camera defaults, you can make those settings camera serial number-specific, or ISO-specific if that is what you feel you need. So far, I haven't found it necessary to go that far. However, I have created my own set of defaults which includes camera profile, white balance, sharpening and noise reduction settings that I find optimal for my camera.

  • Need to reduce `target-player` to support users with older Flash versions?

    Right now we are currently compiling ZeroClipboard using the Flex 4.6 SDK, which has a minimum (and default) "target player" version of 11.1.  I am uncertain if this is preventing users with Flash 10.x from utilizing ZeroClipboard but the documentation I found related to this certainly suggests that may be the case:
    Use the target-player compiler option to specify the version of Flash Player that you want to target with the application. Features requiring a later version of Flash Player are not compiled into the application.
    One reason for setting the target Player version is if you are unsure of Player usage penetration rates and want to choose a Player version that is lower than the most recent one. Another reason is if your users are locked in to a particular Player version, such as when they are on an intranet and cannot upgrade.
    If users with older versions of Flash (i.e. 10.x) cannot use ZeroClipboard because of this, I would've expected more bug reports on it by now.  However, as Adobe is pretty good about pushing Flash Player updates out, perhaps most users have already upgraded to 11.x.
    Can anyone confirm or reject this hypothesis?  Obviously our goal would be to support as many realistic user configurations as possible (i.e. support both Flash Player 10.x and 11.x with a single SWF).
    Resources:
    Targeting Flash Player versions
    About the application compiler options
    Backward compatibility
    ZeroClipboard task to investigate this topic
    Any help would be much appreciated.  Thanks in advance!
    Sincerely,
         James Greene

    Just to add to this thread the links I posted in the other one:
    I can't speak to anecdotes like parents' or friend's computers, but in general Flash Player 10 is extremely widely available -- installed on over 95% of the world's desktops & laptops.  There are more people still using IE 6 than there are people lacking FP 10.  Even in enterprises, which tend to upgrade very slowly, FP 10 is probably on well over 75% of computers by now.
    Catalyst projects truly require Flex 4, which truly requires FP 10... there's not much getting around that.  If you absolutely must support FP 9, one option is to use Catalyst purely as a mockup/prototyping tool (for user testing, client/executive approval of designs, etc.) and then build the final app from scratch in Flex 3.  You won't be able to directly reuse most of the material you created in Catalyst, but it can still be a valuable tool in this workflow -- we've heard from many people that Catalyst lets them create mockups far more quickly than tools they've used in the past.
    Hope that helps!
    - Peter

  • Camera profile with CS2 and DNG

    If I embed a camera profile in a DNG file and open it in ACR for Photoshop CS2, will I have the benefit of the camera profile?

    Thank you. I had seen that FAQ; I was hoping that by embedding the profile in a DNG, I would get around the incompatability.
    Frankly, I don't see what's so special about a profile that they can't get CS2 to support it. Kinda annoying, when combined with the fact that CS2 doesn't support new cameras. It seems that's merely aimed at getting people to upgrade and spend $$$. Even Microsoft supports their legacy products for a few years!

  • Starting up with older OS version?

    I have a quick stupid question. I'm debating this with someone, and the question is, is it OK to start up a G5 tower that is running Tiger with an CD that contains an older version of the OS on it? He says we should not do that, and I say that's hogwash.
    You may ask the purpose of starting up. The purpose is solely to run Disk First Aid from the DVD. The computer has corrupted something, and the intention was to run the first aid, and not to try to install anything.

    You can safely run Disk Utility or Disk First Aid on a machine (likely you mean Disk Utility's Repair Disk feature - Disk First Aid was used on older OS versions) if the disk you are booting from is of the same major release as the OS you have installed.
    For example, you can boot and safely use Disk Utility from a disk labeled 10.4.0 if you have 10.4.0 through 10.4.7 installed on your computer.
    But, you would not want to use a disk labeled 10.3.x with a computer that has 10.4.x installed.
    The reason is that OS 10.4 made a lot of changes to the file system, and OS 10.3.x would likely not understand some of those changes and mess something up.
    Additionally, there is a bit of code on the install disks and in the computers themselves that prevent you from using an older version of the OS than that which shipped with the computer originally.
    So, if your computer shipped with OS 10.4.6 on it, and you are trying to boot from an OS version 10.4.5 (or older) disk, it may not work.
    If it does boot, then it will prevent you from installing. But, it may allow you to run the Disk Utility.
    Either way, do not use utilities on your system that pre-date the OS that you are using on the hard drive.
    An older OS will not understand the newer file system properly. But, if the disk is 10.4.0 or later, then it will understand the OS 10.4.x file system.
    I hope this helps.

  • Set Camera Profile with a Preset?

    I am shooting tethered with a Nikon D700 and I want to apply a camera profile (Nikon D700 Landscape) to each image as it is captured. While tethered, I know how to assign a Preset, what I don't know is how to assign a camera profile to a preset? Thoughts?

    You can also fire one shot, then set the profile, then choose 'Same as Previous' from the preset list.

  • SUGGESTION: Update your profile with your Logic version!

    A suggestion, especially to people new to the forum:
    Update your profile to include which version of Logic you are running.
    Doing this will increase the chances of getting your question answered quickly (i.e., the first response won't have to be "what version are you running?").
    It will also help you get your question answered correctly! This is because there are small but significant differences in the feature set between 7.1.1 and 7.2.x. Therefore, knowing which version you're running will help you get an answer that's accurate to your particular version.

    Couldn't hurt, couldn't hurt. As you can see, I've already posted mine in represntational rubbaducky format. And your good self? The muse of gyroscopy is revealed!
    Or then again, maybe it's not such a good idea. Has a tendency to create tangents.
    -=iS=-

  • Since updating to iTunes 11.0.03 my ION Turntable fails to upload music on PC. Process Works up to point that it tries to upload .  Turntable still works on laptop with older iTunes version

    Since updating to iTunes 11.0.03 my ION Turntable fails to upload music on PC. Process Works up to point that it tries to upload .  Turntable still works on laptop with older iTunes version

    Your question involves too much detailed reading for me, but here's the way to create a custom ringtone for your iPhone on your Mac:
    Use GarageBand.
    Check Help > Create Ringtone there.

  • Camera Profiles Missing from Lightroom and ACR since upgrade to Lightroom CC

    I upgraded to the latest version of Lightroom yesterday. I have discovered since then that the only profile available in the Camera Calibration profiles pop-up menu is Adobe Standard. This applies to Lightroom CC, Lightroom 5 and ACR. Furthermore the folder where the profles were stored is missing. This is a problem as I have lost a custom profile for editing the white balance in infrared photographs. What is the likelycause of this situation and how can it be remedied?

    Hi Beat,
    thank you very much for your reply! :-)
    That is what I find so  puzzling - there are hundreds of profiles in that folder under a "1.0" subfolder...
    And yes, I'm sure it's RAW I'm looking at (and the error message appears before I see Lightroom, so it's not about RAW/JPG).
    While fiddling some more I found out, that if I start Lightroom as an Administrator, everything is back to normal, but I never had to do this before and I don't see why this should be the case. What would cause such a behaviour to appear suddenly?
    Rant:
    The whole UAC idea - as Microsoft implemented it - is a major pain, but so far I was willing to bear the burden for the supposed raised security, but more and more I tend to think about switching it off as I did under Windows Vista. If it interferes with my ability to get anything useful done it's not worth it (and I have other software that doesn't like it, not just - suddenly - Lightroom).
    Thanks for any hints what this problem could be about!
    Cheers,
    Thomas Helzle

  • Firefox 18.0.01 (Mac) Won't synch Bookmarks with older FF versions 9!0.5.8 and 10.4.11) How can I synch these versions? Thanks

    Firefox just upgraded itself to 18.0.1 on my iMac (OSX 10.7.5, Lion)
    I have been using " Synchronize! Pro " for ten years to synch (or Backup) my iMac to my three laptops.
    The Laptops are all PPC (non-Intel) iBooks of various vintages, running OS X 10.5.8 and 10.4.11.
    The synchs ran fine until yesterday, when FF 18.0.1 arrived
    Synchronize! Pro synchronized the drnpcf9j.default folder in the Firefox's profiles folder from the pre-18.0.1 version to the same folder in the three PPC laptops running FF 3.6.24 and 3.6.28.
    Now, with the upgrade to ver. 18.0.1, it won't synch. The bookmarks are now located in a folder named "Profiles" which contains two new folders , neither of them named the old "drnpcf9j.default" .
    How can I synch (or back-up) my new Profiles or bookmarks to the three older iBooks)
    The Firefox synch won't work because the older browsers don't have a synch setup in the "Tools" menu.
    Suggestions dearly welcome.
    Many thanks
    --GG

    You can save the bookmarks to another location and restore or import them into the older versions of Firefox from the bookmarks library window.

Maybe you are looking for