Camera RAW 7.3 Process

I'm hoping someone can answer this question for me.  I'm used to using an older version of Camera RAW, 6.3 which of course is compatible with CS5.  I'm looking to possibly upgrade to CS6 but the process for adjusting photos in Camera RAW 7.3 appears to be different.  I've attached an image of the two different versions of the RAW processing screens.  The one on the left is the 6.7 version while the one on the right is from 7.3.  Is there any way to make 7.3 work like 6.7 did in terms of the sliders?  Thanks.

John Fladung wrote:
Any way to adjust this for all images instead of manually for each individual image?
Easy way is to make a preset where the subsettings only include Process Version 2012...you can apply this preset in Bridge to as many images you select. Just note that if an image had settings applied, changing to PV 2012 will attempt to replicate the look of the previous settings in PV 2012...bit it's not a 1:1 conversion. Some images will end up looking different. In general, PV 2012 is "better" but not always, 100%. If you have spent a lot of time arriving at a specific look in PV 2003/2010, you might want to test the PV 2012 on an image by image basis...I often use Snapshots in ACR to preserve the old look so I can compare it to the new look.

Similar Messages

  • Photoshop Camera Raw Version to Process Nikon 1AW1 NEF Files

    I am currently running Photoshop CS6 for Macintosh version 13.0.4 and Camera RAW version 7.4.0.137 and cannot process the raw (NEF) files produced by the new Nikon 1AW1 camera.  I have shot test photos with the camera prior to purchase, but can't process the NEF files.  Does a Camera Raw plug-in that will work with this camera exist?  If not, when will the appropriate plug-in be available?

    The Nikon 1 AW1 is not yet supported by Adobe Camera Raw (ACR).
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-suite/kb/camera-raw-plug-supported-cameras.html
    Adobe never comments on future camera support in ACR but ACR is updated every few months as new cameras come on to the market.
    You'll have to use the import software provided by Nikon for now.

  • Can I use Camera Raw 8.1 to process files and then open them in PSE 12 ot finsih the edit??

    I really like working with RAW files in Camera Raw for initial processing, but I also like the simplicity of PSE to finish the edit.  Before I buy PSE 12, I wanted to make sure that I could get Camera Raw 8.1 also so that I can use them together.  Is this possible??

    Okay, I didn't know. I'm not a Mac user. I use Windows 7. I haven't had any problems with any version of the DNG converter. If you have access to a computer with the newer OS on it (through a friend order otherwise) maybe you should use that computer to convert your files. Without being able to use the converter, I don't know of any other solution for you. The only problem with converting an someone else's computer is a you wouldn't have the profiles for your camera on your machine. Can you not just upgrade your OS?

  • Camera Raw 6.7 and 7.4 side-by-side?

    Hello,
    I have a Create Suite 5 Web Premium installed, which includes Photoshop CS5 and Camera Raw 6.7.
    I just purchased InDesign creative cloud single product subscription, and downloaded InDesign CS6. The Adobe Application Manager is now offering to install Photoshop Camera Raw 7.4. I am not sure why, since I do not have Photoshop CS6, probably because InDesign comes with Bridge CS6…
    What will happen if I download Camera Raw 7.4? Will it replace the Camera Raw 6.7, or can I use them side-by-side?
    Will Camera Raw 7.4 be even fictional (since I do not have Photoshop CS6)?
    Thank you

    It is here (in the Camera Raw dialog, not Bridge):
    From the Help:
    The process version is the technology that Camera Raw uses to adjust and render photos. Depending on which process version you use, different options and settings area available to you in the Basic tab and when you make local adjustments.
    Process Version 2012
    Images edited for the first time in Camera Raw 7 use process version 2012. PV2012 offers new tone controls and new tone-mapping algorithms for high-contrast images. With PV2012, you can adjust Highlights, Shadows, Whites, Blacks, Exposure, and Contrast in the Basic panel. You can also apply local corrections for white balance (Temp and Tint), Highlights, Shadows, Noise, and Moiré.
    Process Version 2010
    Images edited in Camera Raw 6 used PV2010 by default. PV2010 offers improved sharpening and noise-reduction from the previous process version, PV2003.
    Process Version 2003
    The original processing engine, used by Camera Raw versions 5.x and earlier.
    To take advantage of the newer processing, you can update previously edited photos to the current process version. To update a photo to the Camera Raw 7 process (PV2012), do either of the following:
    Click the Update to Current Process button (the exclamation-point icon) in the lower-right corner of the image preview. In the Camera Calibration tab, choose Process > 2012 (Current).To apply an older process version to a photo, go to the Camera Calibration tab and choose Process > 2010 or Process > 2003.
    But, if can't launch Camera Raw, I guess this isn't much help.

  • Lightroom / Camera Raw / Photoshop issues

    I have a workflow problem that's driving me nuts, so I'm hoping someone can help. I organize my photos in Lightroom and do most of my editing in Photoshop CS6. The problem I'm having is that if I select a photo in LR, then work on it in Photoshop, I can't figure out any way to incorporate Adobe Camera Raw into that process. I can open the photos in Raw via Bridge, then process and reopen them in Photoshop, but when I save them, Lightroom doesn't find or recognize them. So what's the workflow to process photos in Camera Raw, then Photoshop, while still having Lightroom recognize them and know where they are?

    I agree, the best answers are in the previous replies to the OP.  Use Lightroom.!
    As an alternative-
    If you open a RAW image into Photoshop by a Right-click and select- "Edit In" then "Open as Smart Object in Photoshop"  you will have the image open as a background layer in Photoshop with the small corner "smart object" icon.  If you then Double-left-click on the PS layer thumbnail this will re-open the image in  ACR  linked to Photoshop (not Lightroom).  This allows you to have created many extra adjustment layers in PS but always go back to ACR if you save the edited image as PSD or TIFF with layers. This is 'Non-destructive' re-editing of the background layer.
    Julieanne Kost has a video tutorial on this subject at- Lightroom Tutorials by Julieanne Kost
    The Difference Between "Edit in Photoshop" and "Open as Smart Object"   (Scroll down to December 5, 2012)

  • Camera Raw Version in PS elements 13

    What Camera Raw version (not Process Version but e.g.8.3) comes with PS Elements 13?

    Camera raw 8.6 which uses process version 2012

  • What is the optimum core configuration for a new Mac Pro to process and manipulate very large (80 megapixel) images using PhotoShop and Camera Raw?

    Hello:
    I will be using creative techniques to process and manipulate a large number (hundreds) of very large (80 megapixel) images captured using a medium format digital back (Phase One IQ180).
    Final output will be digital fine art imagery printed using an Epson 11880 at large sizes (up to 60 inches x ?), retaining the highest possible quality and resolution. I will be using Adobe CC PhotoShop and Camera RAW as well as Capture One software. PhotoShop filters will be used extensively.
    The Mac Pro needs to be optimized for the above purpose and be useful for at least five years. I plan to max out all the other options (RAM, graphics cards, storage). Performance is more important than cost.
    The few discussions I have found that mention optimum core configurations seem to lean toward 6 or 8 (but likely are not taking into consideration my need for manipulating a large number of very large files), so I am looking to this foum for opinions.
    Thank you,
    Kent

    See if this helps
    http://macperformanceguide.com/index_topics.html#MacPro2013

  • My student has been using Lightroom 4 with Photoshop CS5 on her Mac for well over a year. Because of the difference between the Camera raw version available to her in Photoshop CS5 and the raw process in Lightroom 4, she has been exporting her raw images

    Any ideas?

    My student has been using Lightroom 4 with Photoshop CS5 on her Mac for well over a year. Because of the difference between the Camera raw version available to her in Photoshop CS5 and the raw process in Lightroom 4, she has been exporting her raw images from Lightroom and choosing the "Render using Lightroom option when it popped up in the dialogue box. She has been doing this for over a year and a half without any problem. Today when she hit Command E no dialogue box appeared and the image just opened in Photoshop. I'm concerned that all of her Lightroom edits are not being rendered to Photoshop. Anyone have an idea as to how we can get the "Render using Lightroom" dialogue back?

  • Camera Raw Photo Processing Challenge

    No pressure, just a bit of fun here.  In a recent thread I posted a raw file to illustrate a sky color issue, and several people showed an interest in processing it into an image using techniques they often use.
    Let's do it again, with a better image this time.
    Imagine you've been contracted to do a shoot of a Dark Charcoal Mustang GT for a brochure.  You drive the car to a scenic spot on a pretty day, take some photos, and now you're back at your computer with the raw files.  Your goal is to produce the following:
    A 2400 x 1600 pixel sRGB image that makes the car look great.
    The image might have elements you want to remove, colors you want to improve, shapes you want to distort...  Do anything you want to try to make the car appealing - mild to wild!
    I've posted a Canon EOS-40D raw file here:
    http://Noel.ProDigitalSoftware.com/ForumPosts/IMG_1728.zip
    Open this image using Camera Raw, tweak it as you see fit, and post the 2400 x 1600 pixel result in this thread.
    Have fun!
    -Noel
    P.S., here's my result.  You might want to wait until you finish until you look at my interpretation.  Or look at it now and one-up me!  All in fun!

    Noel Carboni wrote:
    Rob Cole:  Also nice work!  You also chose a bit warmer color balance than I did, though not quite as warm as Yammer's.  However, in your case the sky and clouds seem to have less depth than I would like (e.g., the subject of my other thread on sky colors being a bit washed out).  And, like Yammer's, the tone curve in the darker parts almost hides all the tire detail, though as I mentioned above maybe this is actually a plus.  You did also bring out the depth of the reflections in the surface of the car nicely.  Looks like you distorted the image as I did to both level things a little and offset some of the perspective distortion.  P.S., I didn't figure out which buttons to press on your site to download the full resolution image.  But I was able to get it full screen, which was enough to judge quality.
    I note that neither of you chose to use Content Aware Fill to get rid of the poles in the image. 
    I don't mind "criticism", as long as I *think* we're looking at the same thing - the business of color management really grinds me though - lots of people think they understand what's supposed to happen, but that's not whats happening but they don't know it, and they think others are messed up or wrong, and maybe they are, but nobody really knows... - been there too many times.
    My take on your take:
    - I agree the sky needed more work, but also: the overexposure/clipping made it difficult to bring out cloud detail without it looking artificial (next time drop exposure by 1/3 or so when shooting).
    - I like the pinch of warmth in the background (most of the clouds, and foliage), but not in the car nor the road .
    - tire detail: agree again - I enhanced it a smidge in the next version (see link below).
    - I applied default distortion correction (via profile-base lens corrections), but no perspsective adjustment - mostly just rotated it (counter-clockwise).- I'm waiting for Lr4 to remove telephone poles;-}
    Note: The next version:
    (additional enhancements done entirely in NX2)
    You may need to clear your cache if you recently viewed the previous version.
    http://robcole.com/Rob/Personal/Pictures/Pictures.cfm?embedSWF&startDir=2011&openDir=Misco r&openFile=IMG_1728.nxc.jpg

  • Selection in Aperture , processing in ACR ( Adobe Camera Raw )

    I'm trying to figure out if there is some way to see my ratings from Aperture in finder - on original master files.
    I understand "holy raw" policy and I have been following the threads about painfull renaming techniques
    ( obvious workarounds ).
    Seeing my in Aperture rated raw files in finder is crucial for me because I want to use Adobe Camera Raw for processing .
    I might also use DPP or Capture One for this in some situations.
    (I prefere Aperture for selection work , I love loupe )
    So is there som simple way to do it ?
    One way would be for example if you could give a
    color label ( visible in finder ) to selected master files .
    That would be fine for me .
    And as I understand wouldn't make any changes to the original file ( so it would stay "untouched" ).
    Thanks for any suggestions.

    Just re-read your first post and realised that you want to apply a Finder label to every RAW file based on rating. This is doable, but would require someone to write an app or script, like Adam Tow's app that moves metadata between Aperture and iView.
    The rating for each image is held in the OriginalVersionInfo.apversion file next to each RAW file:
    <key>mainRating</key>
    <integer>0</integer>
    If you are only grading into two categories and Bridge is doing what you want, then there is no reason not to use Bridge, it's likely to be faster for you, which is the main thing.
    Time - setting up a hot folder takes about ten minutes, and I'd never done one before. On the other hand I know my way around Automator etc., as should anyone dealing with large numbers of images. Most of the extra steps are to bring the converted file back into Aperture, automatically linked with the RAW file as a version.
    Here's to hoping that the conversion quality gets better fast!
    Ian

  • I have Photoshop CS5 and a Nikon D 810 camera.  I have downloaded Camera Raw 8.8 & DNG converter.  I can neither open the raw files (.nef), nor process them with the DNG converter. What is going wrong?

    I have Photoshop CS5 and a Nikon D 810 camera.  I have downloaded Camera Raw 8.8 & DNG converter.  I can neither open the raw files (.nef), nor process them with the DNG converter. What is going wrong?  Thanks!

    This is the last paragraph from my very first response to you, post #1 in this thread:
    …Additionally, you need to install the DNG Converter, not just "download" it, and you need to launch it and run it on each folder of NEFs you wish to convert to raw DNGs.  [emphasis added]

  • Processing in camera raw creates diagonal bands on image - how can I fix this?

    I have Photoshop Elements 11 on a Mac running 10.6.8. I have been taking raw images on a Canon T3i and processing them in camera raw at 16-bit and then fine-tuning in the editor with no problems until this week. Now when I process an image and open it in the editor, the image has diagonal bands across the whole thing. The image is still visible through the lines - they appear as distortions or noise. If I zoom in or out the bands are not visible, so I initially thought it was an odd viewing-only problem. However when I save my edited image in various jpg sizes/resolutions the bands are still visible.
    I tried working with photos taken on different days and that didn't make a difference. I tried restarting - no difference. I tried resetting any preferences I may have changed - no difference. I tried adding noise to the photo because I found mentions of banding in areas of low contrast that needed noise to reduce banding - no difference. I tried not changing a single setting in CR and processing - no difference. I updated the CR plugin to 7.4.0.137 - no difference. When I run the software updater in elements it says my software is up to date. I am out of ideas except for reinstalling the entire program.
    I have attached screen grabs to show the problem I am having. On the top is what an image looks like in CR. On the bottom is the same image after it is opened in the editor. When I enlarge the image the lines are no longer visible, but when I save the image as a jpg the lines are visible in the jpg.
    Any ideas as to what the problem is? 

    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2090 How to Troubleshoot iSight

  • Processing several images in a batch action to apply their individual auto camera raw auto setings individualy for each image selected.

    Hi,
    I have a folder with several images that I want to apply Camera Raw auto settings to all of then according to their individual parameters.
    When you open a single file in Camera Raw you can click on the "auto" option to make an start point correction for that image.
    I want to select all images in a folder and apply this procedure to every selected file without having to open every file individually and clicking in the auto option.
    Can this be done from Bridge CC 6.1.0.116?
    Appreciate comments on the viability of this task

    kbarre wrote:
    Auto Sync is functioning as expected, unless I choose Auto Tone first.
    If I choose Auto Tone first, a small portion of the selected images will be updated, but most will not.
    Lightroom's handling of auto-tone leaves something to be desired - I have a lot of experience with it, trying to make reliable develop-setting plugins which include auto-toning. Those plugins have a bewildering amount of logic - something like this: initiate auto-toning, check back to see if it has properly settled, issue the auto-toning again if it never seems to be properly settling... - usually it works out after a while, but even sometimes it never does, and generates an error: can't get auto-toning to settle across all photos.
    The point of all this is that there are bugs in Lr's handling of auto-toning, as you are growing aware.
    Try this:
    * do the auto-toning, then let it percolate for a while.
    * then visit each photo at 1:1 (to force Lr to finalize settings...), and confirm auto-toning has settled...
    Then try auto-syncing that preset (make sure process versions are all the same, and preset does NOT include auto-toning - I would leave process version OUT of your presets).
    Better?
    I don't expect this is a workflow you'll want to do all the time, but as a test it might help shed some light on the problem.
    Rob

  • How to make CS6 Camera Raw process in 16 bit mode by default

    I just received my Adobe Photoshop CS6 and downloaded the current updates. I have noticed that when I download raw images into Bridge the Metadata indicates that the images have a '16 Bit Depth' but when I open the images in Camera Raw the 'Image Mode' indicates that the image is only 8 bits. I never had this problem with CS4 as it would always open the images as '16 bit' so how can I get CS6 to process the raw images as 16 bit by default?  Thanks for any help!!!

    Hi,
    In the camera raw dialog click on the Workflow Options at the bottom of the camera raw dialog
    and under Depth set it to 16 bits/channel.

  • Do I need to use camera Raw to process images?

    Do I need to use camera raw to process raw images b4 editing with PSE? And if so do I need to download it seperately? I can't find it under help/updates in PSE

    What version of PSE and which camera? Normally, if you try to open a raw file into the editor, the camera raw window should pop up automatically.

Maybe you are looking for