Camera-Raw (Raw-Coverter)
Is there available a Raw-Converter that supports Nikon D4-Files under Photoshop Elements 10 - Windows Version.
If yes - where can it be downloaded? I don't mind if there is only a release canditat available.
If no - when will it be available for Photoshop Elemenst 10?
The D4 is supported in Lightroom 4 and the release candidate of Camera Raw 6.7, but this doesn't help you, as it only works with CS5. However, the release candidate usually precedes an official release by about a month or so, so I'd guess that it will be any day now, unless they are holding out for the release of CS6.
Similar Messages
-
I use CS6 on a Mac running 10.6.8. I edit images in RAW, then covert to a Smart Object for final editing in Photoshop. I've noticed the image in Photoshop is not sharp, and when I check by returning to RAW, I can see that just the Amount slider (Detail Panel) has reverted to 0, but the other sliders are as I have set them.
Does anyone know what may cause this problem and how to solve it?This behavior happens only on Mac desktop computer, not on my Mac laptop running the same CS6.
After I've edited an ACR file (including sharpening in the Detail panel), I change the file into a PSD Smart Object to complete my edit by clicking on "Open Object". I immediately notice this PSD file is not sharp. If I click on the bottom right of the image icon to return to the RAW file, I find the Amount slider in the Detail Panel has changed from the sharpening amount I gave it, to 0.
If I do the exact same thing on my laptop (running a duplicate of the same Photoshop CS6), this behaviour does not happen. The image remains sharp as a PSD file, and if I check by returning to ACR, the Amount slider has maintained its setting.
Anything more you need? -
Will Aperture EVER support my camera's RAW?
I own a Leica D-Lux 2 (same as the Panasonic LX1 with a different exterior) and am crushed that 10.4.4 didn't bring support for its RAW files. I wrote feedback to Apple the day after Aperture was released requesting support but they didn't listen to me!
The worst part is not knowing if I'm waiting in vain—if Apple will never support my camera, I'd abandon Aperture now. Arrrrggghhhh....Also the missing support for DNG - which like PDF
will become the standard - is a great disappointment.
I feel Adobe has put much more work, effort and
thought into their new "beta" product. I will go for
this, seems much safer in the long run.
DNG is supported in Apple's products and Adobe's products but only if the particular camera's RAW file is supported. In other words, If Adobe doesn't support your particular camera's RAW file, then you can't convert it to a DNG. If Apple doesn't' support you particular camera's RAW file, then you can't use the converted file.
But why convert your file into a DNG if your computer supports a particular cameras RAW file?
The short answer to that question is for long term storage and future file access. If your cameras manufacturer drops support for older cameras (as Canon and Contax have done), will you be able to access that file, say 20 years from now? DNG is one answer to that question. For other information on the subject you can visit this website - http://www.openraw.org/
DNG is file format created by Adobe to help standardize the output of cameras. What this means is that Adobe is trying to get all the camera manufactures to agree to build into their cameras output support for a standardized file format. Just as a camera can convert it's RAW information into JPEG or TIFF files, Adobe would like them to convert the RAW information into a DNG file.
Every time a new parameter is added to your camera's sensor or a manufacturer adds a new sensor, the parameters for the RAW file change and software vendors (Apple, Adobe, etc.) need to update their products in order to support the changed RAW file. As you can imagine this is a real drain on resources and takes time. Just imagine trying to keep up with all the different cameras on the market, this has got to be a real nightmare!
So, if you want DNG support, the best thing to do is to contact the manufacturer of your favorite camera gear and ask them to add DNG output to the list of file formats that their cameras can output. Make sure that you let them know that you, as working professional who actually creates and owns the file/image, find it very unprofessional, unethical and not at all conducive to a professional business that they would actually create a proprietary file that was inaccessible to you and those that you license the file/image to.
If you want to help speed up the process of having Apple add a particular cameras RAW file to it's list of files that it can read, let the manufacturer of your favorite camera gear know that you would like them to allow Apple access to the proprietary (i.e. secret) information that enables Apple to build real support for their cameras into it's products.
PowerMac G5 Quad 2.5Ghz Mac OS X (10.4.4) 4.5GB RAM, Nvidia 7800 GT, 600GB RAID -
Sony ILCA-77M2 camera`s raw in Lightroom
Good day! When do you plan to include support of Sony ILCA-77M2 camera`s raw in Lightroom ? Photographers really need it as soon as possible because it`s very difficult for us to work with Sony`s standart raw converter and sometimes in difficult situation it`s fully unuseful .
Eric Chan, an Adobe Raw engineer said, recently, that the A77M2 will be supported in the next “dot release” so a few more days or weeks, I’d expect. The ACR 8.5 RC expires at the end of July so it should be before then, and Adobe has a major Cloud-related announcement on June 18th, so probably not before then.
-
Lenteur de Caméra Raw dans cs5
Bonjour à tous
Après plusieurs jours de recherche sur les forums est sans réponses précises, je me permets de vous contacter pour avoir votre avis concernant un réel problème de lenteur, dans le module Caméra Raw de Photoshop CS5 (travail très approfondi).
Je suis photographe professionnel dans une mairie mais ce problème ne concerne que mes travaux personnels, et malheureusement pour vous, ne suis pas bilingue.
Mon problème :
Les réglages via les différents onglets sont fluides, par contre, + j’avance en travaillant en profondeur avec le Pinceau retouche Localisée, plus c'est lent (environ 30s à 1’ d'attente à chaque passe du pinceau Retouche, Ton Direct ou simplement zoomer…)
Questions :
Selon vous, une configuration via les préférences de Photoshop intervient-elle ? Sur le module caméra Raw (cache, mosaïque du cache, historique, Ram…) et comment paramétrer ?
Windows 7 en 64 Bits peut-il être également paramétrer pour gérer cette mémoire via Caméra Raw utiliser dans CS5
Y a-t-il une astuce… par rapport à ce fichier xmp accompagnant le fichier Nef (fractionnement, transfert sur un autre disque de travail…)
Le fichier NEF fait 19 Mo et le fichier xmp accompagnant l’image, peut monter à 10 Mo en fin de travail avec le pinceau retouche localisée pour fondre les "masques". Les réglages du départ via les différents onglets sont très fluides.
Information matériel :
Je dispose de la dernière version Caméra Raw, 6.6.0.621
Mémoire cache Caméra Raw : 50 Go et défini sur disque dur de travail E:
Je dispose de 8 Go de mémoire RAM avec processeur Intel score I 5 à 3.20 GHz. Environnement Windows 7 en 64 Bits
Tous les Programmes, dont Photoshop sont sur un disque dur C: (libre au 2/3)
Disque de travail sur autre disque dur E: (également libre au 2/3 et défini prioritaire).
Dans Photoshop, je traite sans aucun ralentissement des fichiers de 500 Mo à plus de 1 Go.
Mémoire RAM de Photoshop défini à 70 %
Cache 5 - mosaïque du cache 1024 - historique mis à 1
Auriez-vous une solution à me proposer, je vous remercie par avance pour l’aide que vous pourriez m’apporter.
Cordialementpatoche01 wrote:
Hi all
After several days of search on the forums without clear answers, I would like to contact you for your opinion on problem of slowness, in the Camera Raw in Photoshop CS5 (very thorough work) module.
I'm a professional photographer in town hall but this problem applies only to my personal work, and unfortunately for you, am not bilingual.
My problem:
Settings via the various tabs are fluid, however, + I'm working in depth with the localized retouching brush, it is slow (about 30 seconds to 1 minute to wait at each pass of the Brush Editor, tone Direct or simply zoomer…)
Questions:
Do you know of a configuration via Photoshop preferences that affects this? Module Camera Raw (cache, mosaic from the cache, history, Ram…) and how to set?
Can Windows 7 64-bit also be set up to manage this memory through Camera Raw in CS5 to use
Is there a trick or workaround… this file xmp accompanying file nave (split, transfer to another disk of work…)
The NEF file 19 MB and the file xmp accompanying the image, can climb to 10 MB job with the localized retouching brush to blend the "masks". The settings of the departure through the various tabs are very fluid.
Hardware information:
I have the latest version of Camera Raw, 6.6.0.621
Camera Raw cache memory: 50 GB and working on hard drive E:
I have 8 GB memory RAM with Intel I 5 score to 3.20 GHz environment Windows 7 64-bit
All programs, including Photoshop are on a hard drive C: (which has 2/3rds free space)
Work on another hard disk E: drive (also free at 2/3 and priority defined).
In Photoshop, I dealt with with no slowdown when editing files of 500 MB to more than 1 GB.
Memory RAM of Photoshop set to 70 %
History states 1, Cache Levels 5, Cache Tile Size 1024K
Would you have a solution for me, thank you in advance for the help that you could provide me.
Regards
Hello patoche01,
Here are some VERY basic things you can try, if you don't get any more specific answers for this issue...
1. Visit the web site of the maker of your video card and download and install the latest display driver for your hardware and operating system. I suggest rebooting your system after updating display drivers.
2. Reset all Photoshop preferences by pressing and holding Control - Shift - Alt immediately after cold-starting Photoshop. If you get the keys pressed quickly enough, it will prompt you to delete current preference settings.
Bonjour patoche01,
Voici quelques très choses fondamentales, vous pouvez essayer, si vous n'obtenez pas de réponses plus précises pour cette question...
1. Visitez le site web du fabricant de votre carte vidéo et téléchargez et installez le dernier pilote d'affichage pour votre matériel et votre système d'exploitation. Je suggère de redémarrer votre système après la mise à jour des pilotes d'affichage.
2. Réinitialisez toutes les préférences de Photoshop en appuyant et en tenant Control - Shift - Alt immédiatement après le démarrage froid de Photoshop. Si vous obtenez les touches pressées assez rapidement, il vous invite pour supprimer les paramètres actuels de préférence.
-Noel -
Bonjour à tous,
Après plusieurs jours de recherche sur les forums est sans réponses précises, je me permets de vous contacter pour avoir votre avis concernant un réel problème de lenteur, dans le module Caméra Raw de Photoshop CS5 (travail très approfondi).
Je suis photographe professionnel dans une mairie mais ce problème concerne mes travaux personnels, et malheureusement pour vous, ne suis pas bilingue.
Mon problème :
Les réglages via les différents onglets sont fluides, par contre, + j’avance en travaillant en profondeur avec le Pinceau retouche Localisée, plus c'est lent (environ 30s à 1’ d'attente à chaque passe du pinceau Retouche, Ton Direct ou simplement zoomer…)
Questions :
Selon vous, une configuration via les préférences de Photoshop intervient-elle ? Sur le module caméra Raw (cache, mosaïque du cache, historique, Ram…) et comment paramétrer ?
Windows 7 en 64 Bits peut-il être également paramétrer pour gérer cette mémoire via Caméra Raw utiliser dans CS5
Y a-t-il une astuce… par rapport à ce fichier xmp accompagnant le fichier Nef (fractionnement, transfert sur un autre disque de travail…)
Le fichier NEF fait 19 Mo et le fichier xmp accompagnant l’image, peut monter à 10 Mo en fin de travail avec le pinceau retouche localisée pour fondre les "masques". Les réglages du départ via les différents onglets sont très fluides.
Information matériel :
Je dispose de la dernière version Caméra Raw, 6.6.0.621
Mémoire cache Caméra Raw : 50 Go et défini sur disque dur de travail E:
Je dispose de 8 Go de mémoire RAM avec processeur Intel score I 5 à 3.20 GHz. Environnement Windows 7 en 64 Bits
Tous les Programmes, dont Photoshop sont sur un disque dur C: (libre au 2/3)
Disque de travail sur autre disque dur E: (également libre au 2/3 et défini prioritaire).
Dans Photoshop, je traite sans aucun ralentissement des fichiers de 500 Mo à plus de 1 Go.
Mémoire RAM de Photoshop défini à 70 %
Cache 5 - mosaïque du cache 1024 - historique mis à 1
Auriez-vous une solution à me proposer, je vous remercie par avance pour l’aide que vous pourriez m’apporter.
CordialementBonjour,
Je vous remercie pour ce début de réponses très intéressant quant à leurs orientations précises et ciblant bien mon appel au secours.
J'effectue effectivement pas mal de passe avec le pinceau retouche localisée pour fondre les "masques". Je souhaite effectuer le maximum d'intervention pour "fermer" ces images de reportage, car non destructif avant transfert dans photoshop.
Faut-il vider la mémoire cache ? Lorsque cela devient très lent, pour espérer une amélioration (ou et) augmenter ce cache à 100 Go… (à moins que cela ne sert à rien).
Si j'ai bien saisi, votre idée est de développer 1 image à la bonne densité et une seconde + foncée pour "fusionner" certains éléments (je pense par ajout d'1 masque de fusion ?), me parait être une excellente idée.
Votre avis sur la gestion de la mémoire par ACR et Photoshop m'intéresse au + au point car je n'ai pas tout saisi dans ce domaine, je maîtrise + l'image que l'environnement informatique. D’ailleurs, j'ai l'impression que peu de personnes approfondissent autant dans ce "développeur", je fais peut être fausse route.
Je vous remercie sincèrement pour votre aide.
Cordialement -
Photoshop CS5 won't work with the raw files from my new Canon D60 camera. Do I need CS6?
A Canon EOS D60? It had support since Camera Raw version 1.0.
-
Why doesn't my version of Photoshop support my camera's raw files?
Sorry if this is the wrong forum for this question. I just received Photoshop CS5 last week and I just started using it. I was talking to someone the other day and they recommenced to shoot in the RAW format. I did a few shoots today and saved them on my pc (Windows XP Home 32 bit). The problem I am having is when I select a photo it shows in the dialog box, but I receive an error message saying "Could not complete your request because the file appears to be from a camera model which is not supported by the installed version of Camera RAW.
Please visit the camera RAW help documentation for additional information.
I am using a Nikon D5100.Ok. We have a miscommunication here. I'll go see what I can find out.
Yep. Confusion Reigns.
ACR 6.7 Release Candidate is up on Labs
http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2012/03/adobe-camera-raw-6-7-and-dng-converter-6-7 -available-on-adobe-labs.html
Somehow "released" got mixed up in the messages around here (along with errant mentions of ACR 7 and other snafus). -
Why my raw looks different in lightroom and camera's raw processing software
Hi, I am using a Sony A-100 and just start using Lightroom to process my raw file. I quite like lightroom's interface and its workflow, however, a a problem disturbing me is the image look quite different in sony's raw processing software and in lightroom (just import without any editing). In sony's software, the WB and exposure is correct and I don't need to adjust so much. But in lightroom, the color always looks warm and image is underexposure.
Is it a common problem or it is just a special case as to sony's dslr camera.The main reason is that each different software is interpreting image and color data in its own way due, I guess, to different processing methods.
In that way, digital is not different than film : no film render colors and contrast the same way.
You have to choose what fits the best for you.
As an example, I think ACR / LR handle Canon files pretty well ( quite close to Canon's propietary raw converter - neutral settings - ). On the other hand, Nikon owners have more troubles and seem to prefer Capture 4 or NX renderings.
Gilles. -
using Elements 11, can I get a plug in that supports both cameras, and still access my old raw 7.1 files
A new plug-in will support all the older cameras, so a plug-in that supports the newer 6D will also support the older 60D.
The 60D needs at least ACR 6.2.
The 6D needs at least ACR 7.3.
PSE11 ships with ACR 7.1 but can be updated all the way up to ACR 8.0.
What happens when you do a Help / Updates in the PSE Editor application? -
How do I request my camera's RAW files be supported?
So I just noticed that in 10.4.7 Apple started supporting the *ist DL DSLR cameras. My camera is the *ist DS. I think it's only one model older. Any idea on how I get Apple to start supporting the RAW file types from my camera? It's not like I would shoot a whole bunch of pictures in RAW, but it would be nice when I'm going for some blow-up quality shots to be able to use RAW. It might even entice me to spring for Aperture. Thanks for the help!
DamonTry this url
http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphoto.html
Good Luck,
Karen -
Sony cameras A7 raw files support?
looking for Sony A7 raw files support for i-photo.
1. Well that's not actually true. There is frequently a lag between the release of the camera and Adobe offering Raw support. They are often faster to add it, true, but they do not "always" get converters out before the camera hits the market.
2. I'm not really sure just what this proves, of course. How often do you change cameras? -
How can anyone buy new model cameras without RAW support forecasts?
If a person wants to buy a camera and wants to use Aperture, what can they do? I'm sure I want to shoot RAW images, and I'm sure I want to use Aperture, but how does one buy a new model camera when they don't know what drivers Apple is working on adding?
I bought Aperture2 last spring and learned to use it with JPEGs, hoping to use it to shoot RAW images with a newer camera. I've researched cameras and narrowed the field, but when I went to the list of cameras supported by Aperture3, I was horrified. All of the cameras I chose shoot RAW, but almost none are supported in RAW yet, and there seems to be no evidence that they will. I've worked kind of hard, partly learning Aperture, partly researching RAW cameras, and now I'm kind of in shock.
For example, the Canon t2 just came out - the t1 is covered, but how long until the t2 will be supported? Many of the top bridge cameras I'm considering also appear to be missing from the new Aperture3 list - like the the Sony DSC-HX1, the Panasonic Lumix FX35, and the Fuji S200EXR.
I appreciate the RAW support for familiar models, and I appreciate the DNG conversion connection thing - that helps. But what if Apple never comes out with RAW for my new camera after I've committed to it? Adobe Lightroom RAW support list looks a little longer, but is still not much for new bridge cameras. Why should Apple try to keep pace with Adobe, anyway? Why not have an insanely great list of RAW support? Is it that hard to configure devices before they come out?
I could use some reassurance here.Thank you all for your insightful feedback.
I originally wrote:
+If a person wants to buy a camera and wants to use Aperture, what can they do?+
Ultimately, I bought a camera that I liked better than any in my price range ($500 or less) that shoots RAW, and is already on Apple's list -- a Canon G11. I want to get a good DSLR later when I can afford one, and then my G11 will make a superb and sturdy "pocketable" camera. The G11's flexible features are already helping me to learn not only about shooting RAW, but about photography in general. The pictures are gorgeous.
I'm using my new camera with Aperture 3, and it's great. I think iPhoto is good for many people, but for those like me who want to do more with their photos, and need a more sophisticated work flow - well, there's not much comparison between them for these purposes, even though they share so many features now (faces, places, et al).
I also wrote:
+For example, the Canon t2 just came out - the t1 is covered, but how long until the t2 will be supported?+
Well, Apple got the EOS t2i raw converters into Aperture faster than I could get this post up. They were very, very quick. The more I learn, the more I see how many mainstream cameras Apple does support, and the more I appreciate the problem of supporting new cameras that Apple faces. But I still hope they keep facing it, and don't let up.
Clearly, there are always interesting cameras coming that may never be supported, and being able to handle RAW images outside Aperture may be some people's reasonable choice.
I came very close to buying several cameras that were unsupported or didn't shoot RAW at all. But I've already seen RAW save my pictures. I accidentally took a group of important photos with no white balance at all (they're pale green). Fortunately, I was shooting JPEG+RAW. The JPEGs are nearly useless, but the RAW photo's adjusted quickly to "just right".
Knowing I can make certain non-destructive edits with RAW files is very liberating. I know if I make a mistake or want to change the image, that there are a few vital parameters I can adjust.
As to my camera selection: I chose the G11 because so many people with real photography experience seemed to respect it so much. In the end, I decided that good image quality was more important than pixels, zoom range, etc. Since I decided to wait to get a DSLR, I wanted a versatile point-and-shoot with a retractable lens that would become, as I said, my second, more portable camera later.
I've experienced the companion Canon software now as well. It's fine, but I like organizing my photos in Aperture better. I especially need stacks, and being able to make major adjustments where I keep my photos is vital to me.
Now, Aperture is working well for me, and the experience is turning out far better than I had expected. I'm now loading directly into Aperture instead of referencing iPhoto, I'm handling raw images from a new, more modern camera, and I'm finally feeling settled and comfortable with my image workflow. -
Reading a camera CR2 (raw) file
Hello all,
withouth any experience and not much technical knowledge, I need the raw data from my Canon camera (40D) right out of the sensor exactly as it was recorded. The purpose is scientific, images will be analyzed in MATLAB!
I converted CR2 files in DNG files, but can not get the info about linearization curve. With no knowledge about the curve, there is no guarantee that image is presented exactly as it was recorded.
If I use Adobe DNG Converter to do the dematrixing by choosing Custom > Linear(demosaic) and Uncompressed, will that answer my prays?
I doubt while reading some answers on the Adobe Community: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/995391. I lack some knowledge on that issue and do not understand the problem stated completely.,
Please help!
Thanks in advance, Matija.Hello,
I will definitely check Rawdigger! Thank you!
In the mean time I found a useful article:
Capturing linear images (http://www.mit.edu/~kimo/blog/linear.html)
I just installed DCRAW and am testing it; this freeware gives you control over all processing being done in conversion step from CR2 to i.e. PPM.
For more details on DCRAW please check:
http://www.guillermoluijk.com/tutorial/dcraw/index_en.htm
Please provide feedback!
M. -
Is there a download available for the Fuji x-t1 camera's RAW files
I just bought a Fuji x-t1 and can't open RAW files in Lightroom. I looks like Adobe is working on a fix for this but has it come out yet? Thanks.
Its already supported in Lr 5.4. You can upgrage to Lr 5.6 or use DNG converter 8.6. See list of supported camera in Lr 5.6 here.
Photoshop Help | Camera Raw
Maybe you are looking for
-
Friends (as) I have a Macbook Unibody 6.1 (Warrior) hahahaha ... never given problem, it works good. But one night, I was cleaning it, standard procedure for several years. Then I realized that KEYS: 5, t, g, b do not work ... but the other day I CAP
-
I have a 2012 MacBook Pro Retina connected to a Thunderbolt Display, with Thunderbolt hard drives attached to that. Whenever I'm doing a big copy, or a Time Machine backup, any audio being played through the speakers becomes heavily distorted. If I s
-
Change labels on Portal Login page
Hi community, We are running Portal 7.00 SP21 version and on Portal Logon page we have enabled Get Support link. Now we want to cutomize labels on page wich is shown through the Get Support Link (not welcome page). If we unzip the file umelogonbase.j
-
My Intel X18 SDD just disappear on bios
it was fine and booklet recognized the SDD on bios since i was trying to clone the drive instead of new installation. the booklet could not run windows. i believe which is the driver issues. so try and try again. suddently. my books doesn't recognize
-
HI 1.Can you have possible for automatic payment programme run for customer? 2.Which time of scenario as been run to app ? 3.Any setting is there in FBZP ? Thanks Yadam