Camileo P10: bad avi quality but good on youtube

Hi guys
I'm having a problem with my Toshiba Camileo P10
I shot this in full hd, it looks good on the camera monitor but when i copy the *.avi file into my computer it looks like this
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/783/18024386.png
but when i upload it to youtube it looks just fine
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZdlAm5mpOw&feature=player_embedded]
i found a guy who had the same problem on youtube but there is nothing that can help solving my camcorder's problem
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O1GkVC--ZOo]
please help
sorry for the bad english

Hi
The camcorder seems to record the movies in .MOV files format.
This is a apple standard video format and means QuickTime MOVie.
try to play the movie using an Quick Time.
The missing sound might be a problem of missing codec.
Try to install some codec packages like Win7codecs or K-Lite codec.
Furthermore you can also try to use an software called ANY Video Converter and convert the mov to MPEG-II.
You can also try a tool called SUPER 2012 .
Then the original soundtrack should be available and you could edit this movie using other editing software.

Similar Messages

Datasheet says Camileo P10 saves as .mov but the device saves as .avi

I just rec'd a P10 as a gift for Christmas.
Looking at the specs on the online Datasheet and elsewhere the sources say that that the P10 saves video files as .mov but the device I have can only save them as as .avi files. However the box itself does say that it saves pictures as jpg and video as avi (H.264)
And I had to search the Internet for a long time to find a safe CoreAAC Audio (FF) codec file to allow Windows Media Player to play the avi file with sound.
What happened? Why this change?
NB I did find one specification sheet online that said that the camera had both .mov and .avi formats. If this is true how do we access a menu that can allow us to switch between file formats?

Hi,
i've had the same problem recently.
I have sent back my camileo p30, to Toshiba technical center, and Toshiba shipped me back a new Camileo P30 (the old one was having troubles with the sound).
My new camileo is recording in .avi with H264 compression, and the old one was recording in .mov with H264 compression.
This .avi H264 format is not compatible with my video software (pinnacle studio 12), the .mov H264 was perfectly compatible.
So it seems to be the fault of the newest firmware that encodes the video with this format.
*_If Toshiba staff could make a firmware with the old format .mov h264 , for the camileo p30, it would be great !!!!!_*
PS : I have tried with the pinnacle studio hd 14, and the problem of compatibility is still the same....

Premiere Pro CS3: bad video quality when exporting for YouTube

Hi!
I'm a newbie to this forum and yes, I've looked for an answer before posting. I'm also pretty new to Premiere Pro and I hope that the problem I'm having is more my fault than Premiere's (it most likely is.)
I have project, a little YouTube-Video. But whenever I export it, the quality is really poor. I've also tried rendering it with Windows Movie maker and, strangely enough, the quality is much better and closer to the original file. My big question is: what am I doing wrong?
Here are some additional info:
Adobe Premiere Pro CS3
Windows 7 Professional, 32 Bit (PC)
The movie file was shot with a Sony DSC-W170 and is an .mpg file
Video:
640x480
10418kBit/s (total: 10483 kBit/s)
30fps
Audio:
64kBit/s
Mono
32kHZ
Project settings: DV-Pal
Standard-PAL-Video (4:3 Interlaced).
48 kHz (16 Bit) Audio
I used the Adobe Media Encoder for the export, H.264/YouTube. I've also tried several other settings, but I never get as good a result as with the Windows Movie maker. Can anyone please tell me how I can fix this? (Maybe the quality of the video already suffers when I import the files into Premiere Pro? The video in the source and the cutting window is very blurry.)
Here you can see for yourself what it looks like:
File rendered with Adobe Premiere CS3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LTAyx6O27Dg
File rendered with Windows Movie Maker: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVeoUOfM_uo&feature=youtu.be
I hope somebody can help me. If you need additional info which I haven't provided, ask away. Thank you so much in advance for your replies!

YT is set to privet.
Keep project settings and export settings same as camera.
Try H.264 (mp4) for export instead.

Camileo P10 - How to see videos in HD quality?

Hey
My HD camcorder Camileo P10 does record in HD, but when i play the recording in my media player in windows 7, it looks like an old VHS tape.
I have tried many media players, like winamp, quicktime and a VLC player, but all the same.
How come i can get it to show HD quality film ???
regards
Brian

Hi buddy,
Have you set HD recording format on camcorder? I ask this because Camileo P10 can also record in QVGA resolution and this looks like old VHS resolution.
Furthermore on computer make a right click on a video file of Camileo P10 and select Properties. Then choose Details tab and check the frame width (e. g. 1280) and Frame height (e. g. 720).
This would be HD resolution and FHD resolution is 1920x1080.

I would like to connect my Apple TV 3rd gen to a projector and not an HD TV (so I can watch movies on the big screen). Are there any decent price compatible projectors? Good quality but not professional! Many thanks

I would like to connect my Apple TV 3rd gen to a projector and not an HD TV (so I can watch movies on the big screen). Are there any decent price compatible projectors? Good quality but not professional! Many thanks

Thank you for the answer, I suppose the main thrust of my enquiry is to find out if 65 MBits is my ATV theoretical limit of reception. If that is the case then I am happy as a Pig in Mud
I may have allowed myself to become a victim by listening to Fanbois posting elsewhere who always seem to go one better than everyone else. Now I have learnt two things Today; 65Mbit/s = Good enough and only read the apple forums.
Many Thanks
Nick

We are looking for a software which converts SWF to MP4, we found many software which does the job but issue is file size is not optimize. We found Adobe captivate 6 which gives optimum quality with good output but thing is we do not have batch process i

Hi
We are looking for a software which converts SWF to MP4, we found many software which does the job but issue is file size is not optimize.
We found Adobe captivate 6 which gives optimum quality with good output but thing is we do not have batch process in captivate 6. so we request you to create a plugin or give a best option which have batch render quality and optimize in file size,

Captivate is e-learning development software not a dedicated video convertor, you are better off trying something like Adobe Media Encoder or Super.

Health app: bad walking distance since i upgrade 8.2 but good steps number

Bad walking distance since i upgrade 8.2 (but good steps number)
I am using Health app on my Iphone 6 every day since 6 month and since i upgrade, i got ridiculous number for kilometers for example 0,4 and 8453 steps ...i have walk approximatively 6 kilometers.
I have noticed that the speed display for weeks, months, years was very good after the upgrade , but there is somme trouble with tracking …
Any idea ?

Hey Makwassie,
Thanks for the question. If I understand correctly, the steps taken are not being updated in the Health App. I would recommend that you read these articles, they may be helpful in troubleshooting your issue.
If your Health data doesn't update on your iPhone or iPod touch - Apple Support
Use iTunes to restore your iOS device to factory settings - Apple Support
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Have a good one,
Mario

10.6.2: Bad image quality with SIPS

I used to convert my PDF documents with SIPS like this:
/usr/bin/sips --setProperty format jpeg --setProperty formatOptions high -z 400 200 sourcefilename.pdf --out targetfilename.jpg
This results in a very bad image quality after updating to 10.6.2 (the text contained in the source pdf file is nearly unreadable in the resulting image, especially when using the -z attribute for downsizing).
I could reconstruct this behaviour with several machines today: when using 10.6.1 the quality is fine, but after the update to 10.6.2 the resulting image quality is unacceptable.
Any ideas? Or could this be a bug? The man page for sips does not contain any information about new parameters and the image quality for other target formats (tif, png, ...) seems to be ok.

That picture looks like it was taken in a dimly lit room.
You could try using night mode but you will need a very steady hand.
Most basic phone cameras just cannot produce good pictures indoors when not in brightly lit areas. LED flashes just cannot do a good enough job when compared to real cameras.
Megapixels don't equal quality, it's the lens and flash that make the biggest difference.

Bad overall quality

Hello,
In the last few years, Nokia dramatically decreased the quality of its products. I know of 4 people that bought a Nokia phone in the last 18 months, all of them had to be returned already in the warranty period:
Two Nokia 6110 Navigators: one had a micophone that didnt work anymore overnight, the second was unable to chrge after a few months and the camera wasnt working anymore (screws had to be tightened to fix the camera). On Nokia 6110 Navigator, you also notice the bad building-quality, as you can move the slider, even while closed, at about 2 millimeters, on both phones in same direction. (from beginning!) A known issue.
Thrid phone: a Nokia 3120classic, bought 3 months ago, now speaker not working anymore, phone did never fall down.
Fourth phone: a Nokia 6220classic: tried a firmwareupdate and crashed during the update, had to be returned to Nokia Service Center. curently Nokia is investigating these problems with 6220classic and N82.
Besides the bad quality of the hardware, the firmware/software also got so many bugs. On Nokia 6110 Navigator there are so many known bugs, at the beginning (for a whole year!) there were so many obvious bugs (even the daily alarm-clock didnt work correctly!) that we have to wonder whether this phone was ever tested by anyone at Nokia. Nowadays we got used to the remaining bugs, that are also partly in 6210 Navigator and a few of them are all on Symbian-OS60-Phones. As there are tons of bugs on 6220classic too, if you try to update your phone, it is a really big "chance" to get a broken phone.
Great thing, isn't it? The bad quality keeps ongoing on the new products, if you read some reviews of the newest Nokia phones. No wonder, as phones that are soon 2 years old, still got so many (partly obvious) bugs, how could a new phone work the way it should? And the hardwarequality rarely improves if you build the phones in countries in cheaper, eastern countries...

Quoting: mccbleues answer to something i didnt mention:
The old "I never allowed my phone to get wet" story is very, very tired. All Nokia phones have a label inside (in some models, it is visible in the battery compartment, in others it is completely insude) which changes colour when exposed to sufficient watre to cause damage to the phone. No warranty repair rejected for water damage is a guess, it is a water-tight case with strong evidence against the owner.
As for dust getting in, this again comesdown to the phone being somewhere where there is a lot of dust. It has to come from sowmewhere, I and stand by my statement that these modern phones are sophisitcated devices not Fisher-Price toys, if a phone is left fumbling around in a pocket or handbag, or accompanying its owner in a dirty environment, it is susceptible to problems.
Answer from me: Sorry, but do you read what I have written? Obviously not, as all of the phones got repaired for free during warrantyperiod, as Nokia saw that for example there was nothing broken due to water getting inside or dust, or whatever,all had defects caused by bad quality or assembling. Anyway, the problems were not at all related to this kind of things, and I simply mentioned that the phones were always kept in save places, to show you, that it WAS not the customers fault. All 5 phones got therefore repaired for free. I am not complaing about their reparation, because that is OK, Nokia service centers are doing a good job.
The fact is, that I wonder how this can happen, and about the quality of the phones from the beginning on, so i notice a very high number of phones getting broken just due to bad quality of hardware or other technical problems that occur. Even if you might purchse the phone, and only leave the phone turned on and charge every time the battery gets low, without touching it or using it, it might get broken. The Nokia 6110 Navigator that got broken over night (microphone) while lying on a table at around 20degree celsius is such an example. How can this happen? I thought it was impossible to happen, but it happened.
This is definitily a result of bad quality, and not of customers usage-behaviour.
Message Edited by laxlex on 25-Jan-2009 12:49 PM

Bad pdf quality when printing from word 2004

hello,
when i print a document with a lot of screenshots from wort in the save as pdf dialogue... the pictures in the document have a very bad quality.
where can i defin or setup the general quality for the print as a pdf?
i know, that there is a option for compressing file size as a pdf, but I work with the normal saving as a pdf.. and in the help, apple says, that this is the optimum quality..
can anyone help me?
thanks
fabian

Hi Fabian -
Screenshots produce very low resolution images... 72 pixels per inch on the Mac. The settings you are using do produce optimum quality, but based on what you are starting with, and 72 ppi is not sufficient for decent printed output.
If you save the screenshots (Grab saves as TIFF), use an image editor like Photoshop to create a better quality image (200 ppi) & then insert the image into your doc you'll get higher quality output.
There are also other programs that allow for higher quality screenshots if this is something you will need to do on a professional/regular basis.
HTH |:>)

Still bad video quality

even is catalyst cs 5.5 two of my problems do not resolve.
bad video quality in fullscreen. i have some videos for offline view (768x576 @ 2600 kbps) but still fullscreen view is messed up, all blocky, not proper video interpolation. in vlc or any other player the flv file looks fine!
the videos also have a 4:3 ratio and show white borders in fullscreen on a 16:9 screen in letterbox, how can make the borders black?
is there any solution?

Hi
as example
Creating a PAL movie in iMovie HD 6 then import this into a NTSC iDVD project
• Works but with a losy quality
I do use JESDeinterlacer3.2.2 and let this do the PAL to NTSC conversion
Now burned as an NTSC iDVD project
• Best result possibly without buying PRO-applications for $$$$$$$
This way should work the other way around too.
Most modern PAL DVD-players can playback NTSC (if TV is old in Bl/W)
Most modern NTSC DVD-players can't playback PAL
If playbacked on a Mac PAL or NTSC is of no interest.
Yours Bengt W

HT3775 I am using OS X Mountain Lion and I have this .avi file but not able to read. What is missing in my setup and what other file do I need to download to enable me to read? I can read mp4 files though.

I am using OS X Mountain Lion and I have this .avi file but not able to read. What is missing in my setup and what other file do I need to download to enable me to read? I can read mp4 files though.

Here is a link: https://itunes.apple.com/en/app/mplayerx/id421131143?mt=12
I agree that VLC is also a good choice but MPlayerX is more user friendly.

HP5L prints 2 bad pages before a good one

I have an old HP5L black and white laserjet printer purchased in ~1997 (maybe I should not be cheap and upgrade!). It has developed an issue printing on the first couple sheets.
It is a HP Laserjet 5L Xtra, Model C3941A.
It will no longer print a self-diagnostic sheet. After holding the button, the middle light will light once, then the yellow light will light once, and then the bottom light illuminates again, and nothing happens. I pulled the printer cable and removed the memory card and tried again (after cycling the power) and no change.
If I send a file to the printer from any application (I'm in Windows 7), it sends out two pages that look similar to what is attached (there's almost a jagged looking attempt at the first line at the top of the sheet), and then will print the file perfect on the third sheet. And by that, it prints all three sheets (the two bad and then the good one) from one print command. It does not need to be resent. Just eats up paper.
If something else is sent in quick succession, it will also print out fine. It's almost like the printer has to warm up and then it's ok.
I happened to decide it was time to reformat and reload everything from setup files on my computer a couple weeks ago thinking maybe a side benefit would be this problem would go away as something might have gotten corrupt after many years and was sending junk tothe printer. Nope.
The printer is currently connected through a USB to parallel port adapting cable, but did the same thing when using the parallel port.
Any ideas on what to try? The printer still makes good prints after the first two sheets come out, but it is really annoying.
Thanks!
Chris

Hi George,
At this stage you have your table across 4 pages. You have not said if you are using portrait or landscape for printing but it doesn't matter.
When you click on a table it is selected and the ABC and 123 Column and row titles appear, when the table is not selected they disappear. As you seem to have only one table it's going to appear as selected all the time.
When the table is selected there are tags on the top right, bottom left and bottom right of the table which you can drag backward and forwards to make more or less rows and columns the tag bottom right does both rows and columns at once. You can also select by clicking on the ABC / 123 titles and use > Edit > Delete.
It sounds far more complicated than it is, remember the tables are graphics not an excel type grid.
The Inspector and tool bar have all the tools you require although some are repeated on the format bar.
Numbers is best used for multiple tables on multiple sheets not single monolithic grids.
The help option is great too.

PE 7 with Canon 5D Mark II - bad slowmotion quality

Hi,
I've used the trial version for some days now to set up a video with shots from my Canon 5D Mark II.
I want the video clips to play in slowmotion so I've set the speed to 50%.
When I render the video I get bad quite quality (jagged playing) and I want it to be smooth.
Does anyone know if this is a know problem and could be solved in any way in PE 7?
If not, will it be the same problem in Premiere Pro version or does this version have a lot better render quality?
Thanks!

Welcome to the forum.
There are a couple of articles on this forum on "Canon 5D MK II" footage, and many more on the PrPro forum. Pay special attention to links to other articles and also comments from Jeff Bellune, a noted author and Community Expert. While I do not recall "slow motion" being discussed, there is much discussion on the .MOV files from that camera.
The Adobe fora allow one to search by both Subject and by People.
If I find some of the links, I will post them here.
Good luck, and have you done a Render (hit the Enter key) to Preview in the best form possible?
Hunt

5800 Really Bad build quality

Well I am now on my 3rd 5800 and they all seem to have really bad build quality. As others have mentioned there is a big gap along one side of the phone (top right hand side running down past the volume buttons) and in the dark light leaks out through the gap
Come on - how can anything like this be put out to the general public - this is a serious issue. If you can get one side of the phone to close properly then why didn't you get the other side to do the same?
As a product designer I know that during the design stage there are several prototypes made, parts checked etc - how could this be passed as ok?
I am seriously considering ditching the 5800 all together - for something that Nokia are classing as a premium model they really need to re-consider its quality.

This is really annoying me as well. This phone cost me a lot of money and it's the worst build quality/design I've ever seen.
People talk about dust getting in through the gap but what worries me is that it is much more likely to let in moisture! I've checked with Vodafone and moisture damage is NOT covered by their warranty. So unless Nokia admit that it's a manufacturing fault you'll have to pay for the repair youself.
Of course,
1) If their wasn't a gap down the side of the case water wouldn't get in so it wouldn't need repairing!
2) If the phone gets water damaged it's almost certainly going to be classified as "beyond economical repair"!
Come on Nokia, admit it's a manufacturing fault, recall all the phones and repair them free of charge.
Message Edited by colin5800 on 09-Mar-2009 05:50 PM

Camileo P10: bad avi quality but good on youtube

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for