Campaign determination integrated scenario

Hi,
I am struggling with campaign determination Integrated scenario. I have followed help documentation for Campaign Determination in SAP ECC Order processing. I have created subscription for Campaigns, target groups and conditions (replication object cnd_m_sup). Campaigns and target groups are replicated ok to erp. Replication object cnd_m_sup seem to miss some data when I look at the content from smw01. KOND3 is not updated in erp and campaign determination is not taken place (we have debugged a bit and it seems that campaign determination would work if cond3 had been filled). Which publication/replication object fills kond3? Should cnd_m_sup fill kond3? Do anyone have any idea of which config is missing?
thanks for replying,
regards Camilla

Hi Octavius,
Not sure if you have got this issue resolved.
You may want to check SAP Note 856313 (Campaign determination in the billing document), there is no campaign redetermination in billing, and that campaign determination should have been done in the sales order in the first place. Only the existing valid conditions in the sales order are passed to the billing document and not possible to re-determine campaign, so basically the sales order would have to be updated first.
The SAP note contains a workaround which executes a campaign determination when you create a billing document, via the following user exits:
Modify the billing user-exit (RV60AFZC) to set a campaign determination flag for pricing type and pre-defined free issue document type and item categories
Modify the billing user-exit (RV60AFZZ) to trigger campaign determination for billing documents using standard SAP function modules, based on the campaign determination flag
Hope this helps
Hian Ong

Similar Messages

Integration Scenario for Enhanced Interface determination

Hello Friends,
I am modeling the integration scenario for 1:N Mapping case, that is 1 outbound Interface and 3 inbound Interfaces. I am finding difficultly in modeling the integration scenario for enhanced interface determination.
Kindly provide me inputs in configuring this case.
Thanks

Have you look this help?
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/42/ed364cf8593eebe10000000a1553f7/frameset.htm
2.      Integration Directory: Define the interface determination.
Note the following:
○     The outbound interface of the multi-mapping must be entered as the sender interface in the key of the interface determination.
○     The interface determination type must be set to Enhanced.
○     Select the multi-mapping you defined previously from the Integration Repository.
To select the interface mapping, use the input help ().
The target interfaces of the interface mapping are displayed in the Inbound Interfaces frame.
The number of messages (for an inbound interface) created in the mapping step is displayed in the Occurrence column.

Conditional Receiver Determination Through Integration Scenario

Hi
My question is "Is it possible to generate conditional receiver detrmination through integration scenario?"
If yes then how?
Thanks and Regards
Sami

Hi Biplab,
Yes , there is lots of modification in PI 7.1. and we start using it, you will come to know. In this TechEd at banglore , i did hands on the Mapping and it was really good experience, When i started configuring ID, i came to know some powerful ways, and yes i am really looking forward to working on it. Actually, as you know when we configure everything in ID, it becomes complicated, that is rectified thr and also some additional features. Pretty faster than PI 7 we using. also configuration in some extend is automated, we doen't need to bother to configure some of the steps :).
Also you must know that, it added a concept of ESR for IB. Just have a look on some of the PPT for PI 7.1 and you feel it :).
Aashish

Campaign determination log was switched on

Dear Guru's
In the Order Screen We have campaign management Whcih I have Turned On.
Can you explain What is Campaign Management ? and What is the use of the same.
regards,
Amlan Sarkar

Hi Amlan,
{Reward Points so that you are encouraging the SDNers mutually help with more enthusiasm}
Campaign Management:
This Business Scenario Map shows how three parties -- a data provider, a vendor, and a customer -- can work together to plan and execute marketing activities. The map illustrates the benefits of collaboration. Results include lower costs, faster turnaround times, and more effective campaigns.
Campaign Management
This scenario addresses the following business challenges:
    1.
      Business users reliant on IT for customer segmentation, causing a bottleneck for increased time and inefficient execution
   2.
      Inability to effectively coordinate and plan campaign activities, which causes waste and redundancy
   3.
      It takes too long to complete the campaign cycle
   4.
      Communications are uncoordinated single channel u2018blastsu2019. Organizations are providing inconsistent, irrelevant messaging to customers, through ineffective channels
   5.
      Inability to determine the best offer/channel combination
   6.
      Organizations are forced to treat all customers the same way, by sending the same message to all customers, with no ability to personalize
   7.
      Product availability and pricing is not taken into effect into the campaign plan, due to uncoordinated organizational efforts.
   8.
      Organizations are unable to understand the full value of the customer
   9.
      Inability for Business users to create and generate call lists and emails. Often there is a bottleneck in IT, or a 3rd party, in order to develop personalized call lists and emails
10.
      Organizations have no or limited ability to monitor campaign performance during execution, and cannot make adjustments u2018on-the-flyu2019 for maximum effectiveness
11.
      Organizations have no ability to sort through millions of customers and massive amounts of data to understand areas of opportunity, effectiveness and ROI. Tools on the market are not integrated into the campaign efforts
12.
      Uncoordinated campaign task management with constant duplication of effort
Regards
AK

Adding a new reciever to an existing integration scenario of conf in PI7.0

Hi SapAll.
here i have got a requirement to add one more reciever to an existing integration scenario in Integration Directory(Configuration).
this Integration scenario is for sending the idoc MATMAS.MATMAS05 From 5 Different SAP-R/3 Systems to 2 Recievers.
here iam using 5 different business systems with idoc communication channels for sending idocs and 2 business systems for recieving idocs in file format with file adapters.
so when iam trying to create new reciever detarmination or Interface Determination, it says object already exists.
but i can created reciever agreement without any error.
so can anybody guide me on how to create the Interface,Reciever Determinations without any error.
regards.
Varma

now i just created a new business system with file communication channel
Why have a Business System for a FILE channel? We normaly use Business Component/ Service.
You mentioned IDOC SENDER channels....why? For IDOC we just create Receiver channels...unless you want to specify IDOC packaging.
when iam trying to create a reciever detarmination from one of the existing sender system say like BUS_SENDER2 to new
reciver system ex:NEW_BUS_RECIEVER it says object already exists.
Receiver Determination can have the same BUS_SENDER2 system/ service as sender....but it should not have the same Interface Name....this is where PI is throwing the error.
There already exists a Receiver Detremination with BUS_SENDER2 as source system and the same message interface.
You can reuse the same RD by just entering one more receiver system/ service below the already existing one (in the RD)
In short just search your ID and you will see a RD created with the source details which you are trying to use.
If you want to see a difference, then create a new sender service/ system and then use this to create the RD!
Regards,
Abhishek.

Interface Mapping for enhanced Receiver Determ. in Integration Scenario

Hi guys,
Defining Integration scenario is a pleasant way working with XI.
But how to define the step "enhanced receiver determination" via message mapping in a scenario?
has anybody come along to this issue?
Kind regards
Jochen

hi,
You use an enhanced receiver determination to have a mapping program determine the receivers of the message dynamically at runtime. Instead of creating the receivers in the receiver determination manually, you assign a mapping to the receiver determination and this returns a list of receivers at runtime.
A typical usage case is if you do not yet know the names of the receivers at configuration time. In this case, you can define a mapping program, for example, which reads a list of receivers from a table or from the payload of the message at runtime.
http://www.****************/Tutorials/XI/RecvDetermination/Enhancement.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/a5f2066340332de10000000a11466f/content.htm
Edited by: murali krishna on Sep 1, 2008 5:49 PM
Edited by: murali krishna on Sep 1, 2008 6:03 PM

To SAP-XI Product Developement... Bug in Integration Scenario, swimlanes..?

Hi,
I am not sure whether such questions can be posted in this forum or not.. but i have no other alternative. If this is not the right forum i will not post such queries again.
I have posted a query reg "Integration Scenario, swimlane diagrams" in XI Forum, but there were no replies to that. So i like to forward the same to the Product Develpment team and like to know if this is a bug or things do work like this..?
I have designed my Integration Scenario in Design Time, imported the same into configuraton time so that the Configuration Objects (Receiver Determination, Interface Determinaiton, Receiver agreements) are automatically created. I tried the sacenario and its working fine.
In my scenario, i have 3 swimlanes corresponding systems, Sys1, sys2, sys3.
In Run1, a connection is made b/n sys1's and sys2's actions. Imported into Configuration, Configuration objects created,(Rx Determination Created) scenario working properly.
In Run2, another connection is made b/n sys1 and sys3's actions (sys1 and sys2 still remain connected). Imported into Configuration, receiver determinaition changed according to the scenario, scenario working properly.
In Run3, the connection b/n sys1 and sys2 is removed and again imported into configuration, but the receiver determination is not changed to cater to the scenario in design time. The old receiver determinaiton is not getting deleted/chaged). The receiver deteminaiton reused instead of being changed, which is incorrect according to the scenario.
Is this a bug in the software or do things work like this only... U can reach me at Siva_Maranani(at)satyam(dot)com
Cheers,
Siva Maranani.

Hello Aamir,
you are right, I don't need virtual receivers for my scenaro and I also don't want to use them.
However, when modelling my scenario with an integration scenario in the design, I'm forced to do this and I would like to know whether there is any way to avoid this.
In order to be able to use a business service on the sender side, it seems I have to select the checkbox 'External party with B2B communication' in my integration scenario. When importing & configuring the scenario in the directory, I am then able to select by business service for the sender side. However, for the receiver side I have to specify a virtual receiver, otherwise I cannot finish the config wizard.
Any more ideas?
Best regards,
Matthias

Mix B2B and A2A in integration scenario

Hello XI experts,
I'm trying to build an integration scenario in the repository that I want to import later on into the directory for automatic configuration.
The scenario is HTTP -> XI -> RFC. On the sender side I would like to use a business service, so I selected 'External party with B2B communication' for the sending application component. On the receiver side I would like to use a SAP business system, so I didn't select that option there.
Now, if I import into the directory, this doesn't work as expected. I can select my business service for the sender side, this works. However, for the receiver side I always have to specify a virtual receiver service and my receiver determination and interface determination are created with a virtual receiver service in it.
Is there any way to avoid the virtual receiver? Any help is appreciated!
Best regards,
Matthias

Hello Aamir,
you are right, I don't need virtual receivers for my scenaro and I also don't want to use them.
However, when modelling my scenario with an integration scenario in the design, I'm forced to do this and I would like to know whether there is any way to avoid this.
In order to be able to use a business service on the sender side, it seems I have to select the checkbox 'External party with B2B communication' in my integration scenario. When importing & configuring the scenario in the directory, I am then able to select by business service for the sender side. However, for the receiver side I have to specify a virtual receiver, otherwise I cannot finish the config wizard.
Any more ideas?
Best regards,
Matthias

Doubt in Integration Scenario

Hi All,
I wuld like to know whether I can create a Integration Scenario after completing the Configuration steps (eventhough it doesnt make much sense)

Hi Aarthi,
Its not mandatory to create the integration scenario.
The integration Scenario in IR will be useful for re-presenting the whole flow of the interface.
If you do the itegration scenrio in Design time then you do not need to follow the stpes which is required in configuration like creating Aggrement,determination and all. you just need to import the scenario from integration repository that will avoid configure part.
Usually during the audit time the auditor checks whether IS is designed or not? as that is the good practive to design ur scenario with IS.
Companion Guide to Integration scenario
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2006/02/17/companion-guide-to-integration-scenario
It will be good loaction to get all the information about whole interface.
You could either create or transport the same Integration scenario in ID.
With the use of Integration scenario you could model the whole interface with all minute details
It comes under best practices. So if you create the IS it will be very easy for you to understand the and designe the business flow. Morevere becomes very easy while creating/configuring the Integration Directory, you just need to import the design objects form IR.
If you will not create IS, there is no harm. So it all depends upon client and also you.
Thanks,
Vijaya.

SCENARIO CREATION IN INTEGRATION SCENARIO

hi
I have one sender and two receivers. I am creating integration scenario in repository. in integration scenario creation i have to create three swim lanes or
two swim lanes? can i add both receivers in one swim lane? and how will i made
connection between sender and both receivers?
can any one please help me?
thanks&regards
venkat

Hi Venky,
I guess you will be sending the same data to both receivers.
So you do not have to use 3 swim lanes. Create only 2 swim lane.
1. One for Sender
2. Second one for Receiver (no need to think here for 2 receivers, think it when you do receiver determination)
Now, Making a connection will be very easy, just select the ACTION of Sender and Receiver and right click and say create connections.
For creating and working with integration scenario just go through the below link:
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/08/27/modeling-integration-scenario146s-in-xi
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2006/02/17/companion-guide-to-integration-scenario
/people/shailesh.mane/blog/2006/06/27/b2b-configuration-part-i--creating-an-integration-scenario
/people/shailesh.mane/blog/2006/06/29/b2b-configuration-part-ii--creating-the-configuration-using-the-automated-configuration-tool
If need more help, just reply back.
Regards,
Sarvesh
****Reward Points if it helped you.
Message was edited by:
Sarvesh Singh

Counting Integration scenario in SAP XI

Hi All,
Is it possible to count all message flow (Sender+receiver combination) available in system. I have one case where i want to find all message flow available in XI (not in SXMB_MONI).
I have following question:
1> Can I use Interface mapping for this purpose? ( but Interface mapping is not mandatory in many cases)
2> Is Receiver determination can be used?
3> Is there any other possible way by which I can identify message flow uniquely in Repository or Directory?
Any help will be appreciated.
Regards,
Gourav

Hi Michal,
Thanks for your prompt reply, but still some questions left un-answered.
3> Is there any other possible way by which I can identify message flow uniquely in Repository or Directory?
Should I use combination of Mapping, Integration scenario, split mapping to identify unique message flow because it is very important for me to identify unique message flow exist in system whether it is executed or not.
thanks again for your reply, ur answere really helpful.

Problem with Integration Scenario involving BPM

Hello All
I've created simple async Integration Scenario.
Sender is SOAP, then message is being processed by BPM Integration Process (some simple mapping inside - for now it is just proof of concept - later on it will split messages etc.) . Receiver is JDBC adapter.
Now, when I test Sender-> BPM (using Test Configuration tool ) - works fine, no errors.
BPM -> Receiver - as well.
But when I'm trying to test Sender -> Receiver it fails (so it does when I call Sender webservice from external tool).
Error is:
Receiver Agreement
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">O U T B O U N D - B I N D I N G </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">determine OUTBOUND BINDING for: </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-SENDER </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">-RECEIVER </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">http://company.com/xi/sn.DataOut </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">error with outbound binding. </Trace> <Trace level="1" type="T">
No standard agreement found for , SENDER, RECEIVER, http://company.com/xi/sn, DataOutt </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
In fact there is no Receiver Agreement for this pair of sender-receiver, but in scenario those are connected via BPM.
What am I missing in configuration to force PI to send messages correctly?
TIA
Regards
Maciej

Hi Maciej,
If you are trying to test it from the RWB -> Component Monitring-> Integration Engine-> Test Message option, then you should not be giving the receiver system and interface details.
Just specify the details of the sender system, interface name and namespace.
Give the user id and pwd details.
Give the Quality of service as "Exactly Once".
Paste the payload and click on SEND button. (DO NOT GIVE THE RECEIVER SYSTEM details).
It will work.
Thanks and Regards,
ravi Kanth Talagana

Regarding Integration Scenario and Communication Channel Template

Dear All,
1.What is the purpose of creating Integration Scenario in IR?Is it compulsary to create Integration Scenario in Every Case?(I mean Scenario not using BPM and Scenario using BPM).
2.What is the purpose of creating Communication Channel Template in IR?
3.If we create Communication Channel Template in IR?Do we need to utilize that Communication Channel Template for creating Communication Channel in ID?
4.IF we have created Integration Scenario in IR,and we transfered that Scenario from IR to ID,then Do we need to create Sender Agreement,Receiver Agreement,Receiver Determination,Interface Determination?or will they automatically created?
Please clarify my doubts.Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Ramana.

Hi Ramana,
1.What is the purpose of creating Integration Scenario in IR?Is it compulsary to create Integration Scenario in Every Case?(I mean Scenario not using BPM and Scenario using BPM).
>>> For graphical overview about the sceanrio.It is not compulsary to create Integration Sceanrio.
2.What is the purpose of creating Communication Channel Template in IR?
>>> In integration scenario while creating the connection between two actions u need to specify the communication channel templates for Sender and Receiver.
3.If we create Communication Channel Template in IR?Do we need to utilize that Communication Channel Template for creating Communication Channel in ID?
>>>You can utilize these templates in ID.After completion to creating the configuration sceanrio need to modify the parameters of the channels.
4.IF we have created Integration Scenario in IR,and we transfered that Scenario from IR to ID,then Do we need to create Sender Agreement,Receiver Agreement,Receiver Determination,Interface Determination?or will they automatically created?
>>> From Tools-->Transfer Integration sceanrio from Integration Repository, From input help choose the sceanrio,Continue and click on Finish ,with the same name the configuration scenaro will create in ID.You need to follow the Confiuration steps like Assign services , here need to choose u r source & target business systems and Configure Connections in this step you can cross check the interfaces,mapping,channel templates involved in this sceanrio and Generate. It would automatically generates Sender Agreement,Receiver Agreement,Receiver Determination,Interface Determination. It would shown to u Generation Log, here you can check what are the objects generated and if there are any errors it would shown Number of errors.
By setting the appropriate channel parameters, activate all objects from change list.Now u can able to test the sceanrio.
However in latest version it is not compulsoary to create Integration sceanrio in IR and to the above things.You can use Configuration Wizard to do all these things or you can do these mauvally.
Hope it will helps to clear u r doubts.
Cheers
Veera
>>>Reward points,if it is needful.

Integration scenario with BPM

Hi all,
I have an integration scenario: iDoc -> XI -> iDoc,
On the XI I use a BPM process.
1. On the Repository:
I have designed the integration process on the IR, and imported the needed iDoc.
I have created an integration scenario which consists of two SAP R/3 SWC, and an XI3.0 SWC.
The XI3.0 is assigned to the integration process.
2. On the Directory:
I am using the wizard to configure the scenario.
I have assigned the R/3 SWC to the required business systems.
I have created a service named "ProcessBPM" for the integration process and assigned it to the XI SWC.
all other objects(receiver determination, interface determination... etc.) were created automatically by the wizard.
when I send the iDoc to the XI, I get an error on the SXMB_MONI:
Unable to convert sender service ProcessBPM to an ALE logical system.
What does this error mean ? What have I missed ?
Is this the way to do the described scenario ?
Thank you,
Elad.

Hi Elad,
one second
>>I have entered the logical system name of my XI,
you enter logical names for r3 business systems (idoc sender or receiver)
>>Logical system <LS_Name> already exists in service <Service_Name>".
they have to be unique
if you're using BMP - try replacing the business system in "header mapping" (sender system) in receiver agreement
(to your r3 - the one with the unique LS name) - this way you'll be able to use the name as many times as you want:)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/5d/112d20f6ce6c46ba66afb98d278fbd/content.htm
Regards,
michal
Message was edited by: Michal Krawczyk

Integration Scenario Configuator and Business Services (B2B)

We use Business Services to define the services provided by our external business partners (e.g. a transport organization has defined some webservices to which we connect to).
The reason why we use Business Services is that we don't have to define them in the SLD. And we understand from the documentation that external business systems should be defined as Business Services and not Business Systems.
Now we want to use the Integration Scenario Configurator, but when we define a B2B service in the Integation Scenario, we cannot create the communication channels with the wizard. Futhermore the other object (receiver determination etc.) is also not created for the business service.
When we take a look at the definition of a B2B scenario in the SAP documentation, the documentation describes a complete different use of B2B. We understand from the documentation that B2B is a cross company XI landscape where all partners have there own XI system. This also explains the behavure in the configurator since one party cannot access its own business systems.
This leaves us with the following questions:
1. Is B2B only possible for XI to XI scenario's?
2. Is a service provided by a partner a business system?
3. And do we have to include all communication end point in the SLD?
Kind regards,
Christiaan Schaake

Dear Christiaan,
I encountered the same problem. What I did was that I created a party for the external business partner and assigned a business service to it. Beside this you have to check the box (ext. party w. B2B comm) under communication type in the application component in the integration scenario.
When you have done this you can create comm. channel with the wizard and also the other objects.
see: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/e6/908d3f7057eb0ce10000000a114084/content.htm
Regarding your questions: depending on the way we think, we can come up with different answers. I don't think this is what you're looking for.
Maybe someone else can give you a clear answer.
Kind Regards
Ron van Steen

Campaign determination integrated scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for