Can a Server Farm contain RServers that listen on different ports?

PROBLEM:
=========
The requests come in on port 8000, but the two RServers listen on ports 8100 and 8200 respectively.
rserver redirect HTTPtoHTTP
webhost-redirection http://web.xyzcorp.com:8000/signon.html
rserver host server1
ip address 10.0.0.1 <----- listening on port 8100
rserver host server2
ip address 10.0.0.2 <----- listening on port 8200
Q: Can this be done?

Yes this can be done.
The port is specified inside the serverfarm
ie:
serverfarm MyFarm
rserver server1 8100
ins
reserver server2 8200
ins
Gilles.

Similar Messages

Can odi server and essbase/planning servers be on different machines if dat

hi,
1) Can odi server and essbase/planning servers be on different machines if data and metadata is to be loaded to essbase
2)Does web services of odi works with tomcat instead of oc4j
Pls help asaj
Edited by: hyp big bee on Jul 7, 2009 5:09 AM

Hi,
1) Yes
2) Yes
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

I have a form that has multiple fields but has 5 sections. I have used mail merge to insert information but I can't get Excel to recognize that I need different names and addresses for each section. Please help.

I have a form that has multiple fields but has 5 sections. I have used mail merge to insert information but I can't get Excel to recognize that I need different names and addresses for each section. Please help.

Thanks for your response. I do believe I have the information needed for each form on a separate line in Excel. There is a first name, middle name, last name, city, and zip column. And field is entered on a different line for all the information. I'm really stuck.

Please help me creating a new listener with different port#.

I have two instances in a server. both have different homes. I want to create a seperate listener for the second one i created.
But that is not happening.
here i tried to give name from LISTENER TO LISTENER1 & Port# from 1521 to 1524.
SID_LIST_LISTENER =
(SID_LIST =
(SID_DESC =
(SID_NAME = PLSExtProc)
(ORACLE_HOME = /apps2/oracle)
(PROGRAM = extproc)
LISTENER1 =
(DESCRIPTION_LIST =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = IPC)(KEY = EXTPROC1))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = aixth53)(PORT = 1524))
When I check lsnrctl status with LISTENER1 , it still shows the other instance home with port#: 1521
Please help me creating a new listener with different port#.
Thanks,

marist89 wrote:
sb92075 wrote:
marist89 wrote:
sybrand_b wrote:
The listener is a broker only and doesn't play any role in normal communications.
It just forks a process or a thread, and that's it.And the listener is a single point of failure. Listener goes down, you can't connect to the db. That's why you need two listeners.If listener one goes down, then listener two goes down for exact same reason since it is a single executable file.I'm not playing tit-for-tat with you. Fact is, there are situations where people who are not you might want to use more than one listener.Some folks might want to jab a sharp pencil into their eye, too.
Just because you can do something, it does not necessarily mean it should be done.

Can two server farm share the same VIP?

Hello,
Can i create two server farm and share the same VIP? for example:
is posible this configuration?
rserver host des1
ip address 10.24.18.34
inservice
rserver host des2
ip address 10.24.18.35
inservice
rserver host was1
ip address 10.24.18.10
inservice
rserver host was2
ip address 10.24.18.11
inservice
serverfarm host farm1
rserver des1
    inservice
rserver des2
    inservice
serverfarm host farm2
rserver was1
    inservice
rserver was2
    inservice
class-map type http loadbalance match-all Check-Headers-10
2 match http url .*
3 match http header Host header-value "10.24.16.*"
4 match http header User-Agent header-value ".*MSIE.*"
class-map type http loadbalance match-all Check-Headers-s-10
2 match http url .*
3 match http header Host header-value "10.24.16.*"
4 match http header User-Agent header-value ".*MSIE.*"
class-map type http loadbalance match-all other-http-10
2 match http url .*
class-map type http loadbalance match-all other-http-s-10
2 match http url .*
class-map match-all server-vlan-vip-10-http
2 match virtual-address 10.24.16.10 tcp eq www
class-map match-all server-vlan-vip-10-https
2 match virtual-address 10.24.16.10 tcp eq https
policy-map type loadbalance first-match http-10-lb
class Check-Headers-10
    serverfarm farm2
class other-http-10
    serverfarm farm2
policy-map type loadbalance first-match http-10-s-lb
class Check-Headers-s-10
    serverfarm farm1
class other-http-s-10
    serverfarm farm1
policy-map type loadbalance first-match lb-logic-10
class class-default
    serverfarm farm2
policy-map type loadbalance first-match lb-logic-s-10
class class-default
    serverfarm farm1
policy-map multi-match server-vip-service-policy-10
class server-vlan-vip-10-http
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy http-10-lb
    loadbalance policy http-10-s-lb
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply
class server-vlan-vip-10-https
    loadbalance vip inservice
    loadbalance policy lb-logic-10
    loadbalance policy lb-logic-s-10
    loadbalance vip icmp-reply
interface vlan 233
description Servidores_Balanceados_outside
peer ip address 10.24.16.7 255.255.255.0
access-group input anyone
access-group output anyone
service-policy input client-vips
no shutdown
interface vlan 242
description Servidores_desarrollo1
peer ip address 10.24.18.33 255.255.255.240
access-group input anyone
access-group output anyone
service-policy input server-vip-service-policy-10
no shutdown

Hello gdufour,
Actually i've got this configuration:
1.) One serverfarm (farm1).
2.) In this serverfarm, i have two real servers des1 and des2.
3.) The real servers are using VIP 10.24.16.10.
4.) The loadbalance is roundrobin using http with headers.
I want to have:
1.) One new server (a.b.c.d), it can be in the same subnett.
2.) This server don't know if can belong to serverfarm farm1.
2.) When i reach to http://index/url/url1, this has to be to VIP 10.24.16.10.
3.) When i reach the link, the VIP 10.24.16.10 redirect to server a.b.c.d.
4.) When the server a.b.c.d down, the serverfarm farm1 have to take the load of the url.
Is posible this configuration?
Thank you.
Best Regards

Can I run the DSCC ADS instance on a different port?

Due to a limited environment I must run 2 instances of DSCC 6.3 on a single server. I was able to put tomcat on a diferent port from 8080, but I can not get the second DSCC ADS instance to go to a diferent port than 3998 and 3999. Can this be done?
Thank you.
tad
Edited by: tadeu on Jul 9, 2009 3:34 PM

You can have multiple instances in one box/zone running on different ports and there needs to be only one DSCC registry per box/zone. You do NOT need install DSEE zip multiple times to have multiple instances.
eg: Install DSEE in /export/home/dsee63
# create new instances like
$ /export/home/dsee63/ds6/bin/dsadm create -p 1389 -P1636 /export/home/inst1
$ /export/home/dsee63/ds6/bin/dsadm create -p 2389 -P 2636 /export/home/inst2
$ /export/home/dsee63/ds6/bin/dsadm create -p 3389 -P 3636 /export/home/inst3
Register all of them with the SAME dscc registry
# create registry
$ /export/home/dsee63/dscc6/bin/dsccsetup initialize
# register
$ /export/home/dsee63/dscc6/bin/dsccreg add-server /export/home/inst1
$ /export/home/dsee63/dscc6/bin/dsccreg add-server /export/home/inst2
$ /export/home/dsee63/dscc6/bin/dsccreg add-server /export/home/inst3

ACE with sticky http-cookies across two server farms issue

Hi,
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-qformat:yes;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
We need the same sticky http cookie to applied to two server farms (which are actually the same servers but listening on different ports in each farm) to persist sessions to the same real backend server.
e.g.
Farm1 (front end HTTP service) - StickyGroup1
rserver1 - 192.168.0.1:80
rserver2 - 192.168.0.2:80
rserver3 - 192.168.0.3:80
Farm2 (SSL front end authentication service) - StickyGroup2
rserver1 - 192.168.0.1:443
rserver2 - 192.168.0.2:443
rserver3 - 192.168.0.3:443
We have setup two Sticky Groups (one for each of the farms above) both using the same cookie name e.g. cookieXYZ
Our service is behind a single virtual server configured as follows (example URL and addresses):
Virtual Server Configuration
Virtual server name: www.somedomain.com
Virtual IP: 2.2.2.2
TCP/443 (https)
SSL Termination - Proxy service name: www.somedomain.com (all keys and certs loaded and correct)
L7 Load Balancing - **inline** rule match HTTP URL:(/AuthenticateMe/).* Action : Sticky, Group: StickyGroup2, SSL Initiation enabled (www.somedomain.com)
Default L7 Load Balancing action : Sticky, Group: StickyGroup1
So normally we would expect users to first hit www.somedomain.com first and therefore Farm1, get cookieXYZ from the ACE (cookie insert is only enabled on StickyGroup1) and then be redirected to www.somedomain.com/AuthenticateMe which matches the inline URL L7 rule which directs the request at Farm2 - at this point we expected the ACE to use cookieXYZ to persist the user to the same real server hit in Farm1 but instead the stickiness doesn't seem to work.
We suspect that the ACE uses IP:port as the unique value in the Cookie ID and therefore the ACE fails to match the same real host in a different farm because we are using a mix of port numbers across farms. Is this correct? Is there another way of accomplishing what we are after with a different configuration but still the same setup with single VIP and multiple services on the backend servers?
Any suggestions or solutions appreciated.
Thanks
Paul

The issue is related to the fact that it's not about persistence because there are only "new" services in the backend in SSL, you want to keep the IP address.
With a little bit of dev, the only way to acheive this is to redirect the user when he has been sent to http and adding a "tag" (cookie / token in the URL), then on the SSL virtual server, when performing SSL offload matching this tag to send to user to the right server. But it will be a 1-to-1 mapping.

Question: one weblogic server listening on several port

can i start one weblogic server that listening on several port, one for
different application?
for example,
7001 for general user, and
7005 for admistrators and ask for two way authentification?
can i do this? or do i have to start two weblogic instance? does that
violate it's license for one computer and one ip address?
thank u.

Ummm.. how would this help security? If I want to bypass authentication, I just go to the unprotected port.
I don't think you can listen to different ports in the same instance
. You can listen to different IP addresses in the same instance.
WL is licensed by CPU so this would not cost any more to license.
mike
"Gong Wenxue" <[email protected]> wrote:
can i start one weblogic server that listening on several port, one for
different application?
for example,
7001 for general user, and
7005 for admistrators and ask for two way authentification?
can i do this? or do i have to start two weblogic instance? does that
violate it's license for one computer and one ip address?
thank u.

Failover between server farms

Hi,
I'm requesting advise on problem below :
- I have 2 datacenter with one server farm on each DC and 5 servers behind each server farm
- each server has 5k max connection limit on each server farm
- I want to be able to be able to failover to one SF to another when max connection for the server farm reach 25k (that mean each of 5 servers has reached its max conn)
Can I do that with partial-threshold ?
in Cisco documentation it's stated : "
Each time that a server is taken out of service (for example, using the CLI, a probe failure, or the retcode threshold is exceeded), the ACE is updated"
Would max-conn exceed be equivalent to "out of service" ?
thanks for any contribution
cheers

Hi,
I beleive Cisco ACE platform because of H/w design will not do failover for partial-threshold when primary server farms servers reached "MAXCONN" state and partial-threshold trigger. you will observe connection drop in that condition.
for your setup i will suggest to use simple backup server farm with no partial threshold. this work and when all the server in serverfarm are no longer usable (out of service or maxconn) back server farm will be activated.

Configuring Health Probe for Server Farm

If I have a server farm with real servers listening on port 8888 and I apply an HTTP-type health probe with no port number specified, will the ACE know to probe the servers at 8888 or will it try to probe port 80?

Hi,
Yes it should inherit the port from the real servers defined in the serverfarm. This gives you the flexibility to associate same probe with different serverfarms probing different servers on different ports. This is probe port inheritance feature which is there in ACE.
Regards,
Kanwal

SP 2013 - Error: This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm

Hello Community!
I am working with SharePoint 2013 and I built a farm inside the firewall. Then a decision was made to move the two WFE's to the DMZ. Since that time, whenever I try to access the site collections, I get the error below.  Other information: All
the web applications are on port 80, but I'm not having any problem with accessing Central Administration which is on port 8080; the network team did screw up the DNS originally, but I'm told it's correct now; the two WFE's servers show in my Manage servers
on the Farm interface 2X, once with the server name, once with the fully Qualified Domain Name, the ones with the FQDN shows a Services Running status of Not Configured.
Has anyone else ever seen this error and if so please provide guidance and instruction for fixing the error.
Thanks!
Tom
Server Error in '/' Application.
This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm by users who have permissions in SQL Server
to read from the configuration database. To connect this server to the server farm, use the SharePoint Products Configuration Wizard, located on the Start menu in Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Products.
Description:
An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the
code.
Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm by users who have permissions in SQL Server to read from the configuration database. To connect this server
to the server farm, use the SharePoint Products Configuration Wizard, located on the Start menu in Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Products.
Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified
using the exception stack trace below.
Stack Trace:
[InvalidOperationException: This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm by users who have permissions in SQL Server to read from the configuration
database. To connect this server to the server farm, use the SharePoint Products Configuration Wizard, located on the Start menu in Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Products.]
   Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SPUtility.AlternateServerUrlFromHttpRequestUrl(Uri url) +262
   Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPAlternateUrl.GetContextUri(HttpContext ctx) +385
   Microsoft.SharePoint.SPAppRequestContext.InitCurrent(HttpContext context) +1013
   Microsoft.SharePoint.SPAppRequestContext.get_Current() +175
   Microsoft.SharePoint.SPGlobal.CreateSPRequestAndSetIdentity(SPSite site, String name, Boolean bNotGlobalAdminCode, String strUrl, Boolean bNotAddToContext, Byte[] UserToken,
SPAppPrincipalToken appPrincipalToken, String userName, Boolean bIgnoreTokenTimeout, Boolean bAsAnonymous) +400
   Microsoft.SharePoint.SPRequestManager.GetContextRequest(SPRequestAuthenticationMode authenticationMode) +120
   Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPFarm.get_RequestAny() +370
   Microsoft.SharePoint.SPLanguageSettings.GetGlobalInstalledLanguages(Int32 compatibilityLevel) +39
   Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPTemplateFileSystemWatcher.RefreshInstalledLocales() +103
   Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPTemplateFileSystemWatcher.Initialize() +130
   Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationRuntime.SPRequestModule.System.Web.IHttpModule.Init(HttpApplication app) +873
   System.Web.HttpApplication.RegisterEventSubscriptionsWithIIS(IntPtr appContext, HttpContext context, MethodInfo[] handlers) +582
   System.Web.HttpApplication.InitSpecial(HttpApplicationState state, MethodInfo[] handlers, IntPtr appContext, HttpContext context) +322
   System.Web.HttpApplicationFactory.GetSpecialApplicationInstance(IntPtr appContext, HttpContext context) +384
   System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.InitializeApplication(IntPtr appContext) +397
[HttpException (0x80004005): This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm by users who have permissions in SQL Server to read from the configuration database. To
connect this server to the server farm, use the SharePoint Products Configuration Wizard, located on the Start menu in Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Products.]
   System.Web.HttpRuntime.FirstRequestInit(HttpContext context) +646
   System.Web.HttpRuntime.EnsureFirstRequestInit(HttpContext context) +159
   System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest wr, HttpContext context) +771
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:4.0.30319; ASP.NET Version:4.0.30319.18010
Tom Molskow - Senior SharePoint Architect - Microsoft Community Contributor 2011 and 2012 Award -
Linked-In - SharePoint Gypsy

Hi Tom,
According to your description, my understanding is that you got an error when you moved your SharePoint.
This error occurs when the SharePoint farm administrator cannot connect to your configuration database. Please verify the followings:
Make sure that from the SharePoint front end and application servers that you can ping your SQL server.
Make sure that your Farm account has permission to the configuration database.
Lastly verify that your database didn't for some reasons go into recovery mode.
once everything is fine and you are still having issues, restart the SQL host service on the SQL server. Once the service is restarted you will need to reboot Central Admin and then your front end servers.
In addition, as you built your farm inside the firewall, please disable the firwall, or create rules for SQL Server service in the firwall on SQL server. More information about creating rules in firewall, please refer to the following posts:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c5d4d0d0-9a3b-4431-8150-17ccfbc6fb82/can-not-create-data-source-to-an-sql-server
http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1929/configure-windows-firewall-to-work-with-sql-server/
Here is a similar post for you to take a look at:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ea54e26c-1728-48d4-b2c5-2a3376a1082c/this-operation-can-be-performed-only-on-a-computer-that-is-joined-to-a-server-farm-by-users-who-have?forum=sharepointgeneral
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Wendy
Wendy Li
TechNet Community Support

Create a SharePoint 2013 Appplication in C#,Error:This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm

I want to create a sharepoint application in C#:
SPFarm CurrentFarm = SPFarm.Local;
SPWebApplicationBuilder webAppBlder = new SPWebApplicationBuilder(CurrentFarm);
webAppBlder.UseNTLMExclusively = true;
webAppBlder.AllowAnonymousAccess = false;
webAppBlder.UseSecureSocketsLayer = false;
SPWebApplication webApp = webAppBlder.Create();
webApp.Provision();
It's create a new application succeed,but when I view the site there is an error:
This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm by users who have permissions in SQL Server to read from the configuration database. To connect this server to the server farm, use the SharePoint Products Configuration
Wizard, located on the Start menu in Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Products.
How can I fix this issue?
ps:I had create some new application in sharepoint web site.It's all fine without any issue.
The sharepoint server,sqlserver and the programs in the same machine.
Besr regards

Hi,
I think below line is causing the error -
SPWebApplicationBuilder webAppBlder = new SPWebApplicationBuilder(CurrentFarm);
can you put that line within a try catch and see that causes an exception. If so, you might try as below-
SPSecurity.RunWithElevatedPrivileges(delegate()
webAppBuilder = new SPWebApplicationBuilder(CurrentFarm);
Hope this helps!
Ram - SharePoint Architect
Blog - SharePointDeveloper.in
Please vote or mark your question answered, if my reply helps you

SharePoint 2013 - Server Error in '/' Application - This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm by users who have permissions in SQL Server to read from the configuration database

Hi
After I ran SharePoint configuration wizard successfully to upgrade to SharePoint 2013 / SP1.
I can open Central Administration site just fine.
but now when I open any Site collection, I got this error.
Server Error in '/' Application
This operation can be performed only on a computer that is joined to a server farm by users who have permissions in SQL Server to read from the configuration database. To connect this server to the server farm, use the SharePoint Products Configuration
Wizard, located on the Start menu in Microsoft SharePoint 2010 Products
I have restarted all the servers: SQL server, WFE and APP servers but still cann't get this resolve.
Services on all servers are running, IIS - application pools are running.
Can someone help with where that could be a problem or if there is a solution.
Thanks in advance for your comments or advices.
Swanl

Please verify the followings:
Make sure that from the SharePoint front end and application servers that you can ping your SQL server.
Make sure that your Farm account has permission to the configuration database.
Lastly verify that your database didn't for some reasons go into recovery mode.
once everything is fine and you are still having issues, restart the SQL host service on the SQL server.
Once the service is restarted you will need to reboot Central Admin and then your front end servers.
In addition, as you built your farm inside the firewall, please disable the firwall, or create rules for SQL Server service in the firwall on SQL server.
More information about creating rules in firewall, please refer to the following posts: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c5d4d0d0-9a3b-4431-8150-17ccfbc6fb82/can-not-create-data-source-to-an-sql-server http://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/1929/configure-windows-firewall-to-work-with-sql-server/
Here is a similar post for you to take a look at: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ea54e26c-1728-48d4-b2c5-2a3376a1082c/this-operation-can-be-performed-only-on-a-computer-that-is-joined-to-a-server-farm-by-users-who-have?forum=sharepointgeneral
Please 'propose as answer' if it helped you, also 'vote helpful' if you like this reply.

Can a real Server be applied in two different server farms associated with two different VIP IP and TCP Port

Good day everyone,
I have a question in regard to real server operation with different server farms, and VIPs
Can a Real Server be associated ( for simpliciy) with two different Server Farms that have a VIP associated with each, servicing the same TCP Port (443).
Example:
SF-A
RSRV-1: 192.168.1.10 /24
RSRV-2: 192.168.1.11 /24
VIP-A: 192.168.1.20 /24
VIP-A: https:web-A
Protocol: HTTPS
SF-B
RSRV-2: 192.168.1.11 /24
RSRV-3: 192.168.1.12 /24
VIP-B: 192.168.1.30 /24
VIP-b: https:web-B
Protocol: HTTPS
Client-A: 172.16.128.10
Client-B: 172.16.128.15
I have attached an sketch depicting the connectivity.
As always any feedback/Suggestions will be greatly apprecaited.
Cheers,
Raman Azizian

Raman,
This type of config is no problem. What the server is doing is virtual web hosting. The server would have two different web services running for the same IP, but each listening for a unique host header.
From an IP point of view both connections would be destined to the rserver address on port 80, but in the http header they would have two different Host headers.
one for www.example1.com and the second for www.example2.com. If the web server is configured correct so each host name is tied to one web service it will not have any issues.
The config you attached looks ok. The way you have the sticky group is ok doing source IP. If you use cookies for the sticky group I would suggest you create two sticky groups each with a different cookie name and add the same serverfarm to both groups. The client will only send a cookie for the domain it received it from so using the same cookie in two vips could cause problems if the same client hits both vips.
Hope that helps
Regards
Jim

How can I create a URL for a PWA for MS Project Server 2010 project file that includes the view?

Hi, this question has been answered for 2013. The answer here suggests that it can be done in 2010.
See:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/projectserver/en-US/3affdc4f-36bf-4381-8b75-27c73465efd4/action?threadDisplayName=how-can-i-create-a-url-for-a-pwa-for-ms-project-server-2013-project-file-that-includes-the-view
Who knows how?
Regards
Sander

Hi Sander,
As far as I tested it, it is not possible either with PS2010. The URL only contains the PDP name and the projUID.
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

Can a Server Farm contain RServers that listen on different ports?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for