Can Aperture recognize star ratings or keywords on import?

I do all my initial sorting and culling of images outside Aperture (Photo Mechanic, which I highly recommend). I tag images with star ratings. I would like to import only those photos with a star rating above some threshold. Is there a way for Aperture to recognize those star ratings in the import dialog, such that I could filter the photos that I want to import? I would prefer to do that in place, rather than having to move or copy all those large RAW (NEF) files to another folder just for import into Aperture. A related question would be whether Aperture could filter by keywords or other metadata that is already associated with an image? Thanks, David.

Just wanted to say that your understanding of Referenced and Managed now seems correct. Managed Masters is a very good way to start with Aperture. There is so much to learn, and a few tall conceptual hurdles to clear, that this administration decision can be safely postponed. Aperture makes it easy to change any Image's Master from either status to the other.
In the longer term, however, Referenced Masters are often a better set-up -- and become necessary for large Libraries.
Note that there is no reason not to have a mix. "Managed" and "Referenced" refer the status of each Image's Master. I keep my personal Library on my laptop, and keep as Managed all recently imported Images and all portfolio Images. This allows me complete adjustment, printing, and exporting of those Images whenever I have my computer. All the other Masters are stored on an external drive at work.
But note, too, that Referenced Masters are not backed up in Vaults. If you use Vaults, you will have to back up your Referenced Masters using a method other than Aperture's Vault feature.

Similar Messages

1.1: No more star ratings on thumbnails?

Hello all,
As most of you did, I upgraded Aperture to 1.1. I'm now having a very annoying problem that I was hoping someone may be able to give some insight into.
When I'm going through the images (either fullscreen or windowed), when I would assign star-ratings or keywords, a little star icon and a "keyword" icon would show up on the thumbnail. Now, however, those icons do not show up, and I have no idea if I've rated the picture (or, for that matter, what I rated it). Is this a bug? A feature of 1.1? A problem with my Aperture 1.1.
I checked preferences, but that did not have anything to indicate that this is a feature that needs (re-)enabling.
I welcome any thoughts. Thanks in advance!
Doug

Hi Doug - check your view options: Cmd-J, or View menu>View Options...
In the options pane, is the heading "Grid View" selected/checked?

Transferring Star Ratings

Hi,
I've built a large collection of tracks in iTunes over the years and have meticulously 'star-rated' every one. A few months ago I bought a new computer (my first Mac) and transferred my music files across. Everything worked well except I lost my star ratings. Really don't want to start again (I have over 5000 tracks!). Is there a way I can transfer the star-ratings? Any ideas on what I did wrong?
Thanks

Simpliest way is to tranfer the whole iTunes folder which will include the files containing ratings etc.
Similar thread here :
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3974475?tstart=0

Can Aperture import keywords and ratings from Lightroom?

Decided to download the Aperture trial, and imported 17,000 images without a problem until I realised that my keywords and star ratings are missing (and even some vertical shots are horizontal).
Is there a way to get Aperture to look at the sidecar files generated by Lightroom? Without that I'm unlikely to use Aperture for anything other than books that iPhoto can't do.
Thanks,
Nigel

Unfortunately, no.
It might be possible by use of AppleScript (the script would need to parse the XML files and put this data into Aperture), but this would not be trivial to write and to the best of my knowledge nobody has done it.
It's a shame, as Aperture can export XMP sidecar files so LR will pick up Aperture ratings and keywords (but not adjustments) just fine.

Importing photos from ZoomBrowser into iPhoto without losing keywords and star ratings

I have been using Canon's ZoomBrowser EX on my Windows Vista laptop. I have just bought a MacBook Air running Lion. I would like to import all of my photos to iPhoto, but when I do this I lose all of the keywords and star ratings I have associated with my many photos. Is there any way to import the photos into iPhoto while retaining the keywords and star ratings so that I can use them in iPhoto? Doing this manually would be impractical due to the large number of photos involved.
Thanks.
- Charlie

Keywords:
Iphoto can certainly import them if they are written to the correct fields of the standard metadata. They key question is can your Windows app write them to the files?
Ratings
There's no real way to share ratings via standard metadata, but if you can write the keywods, then you can quickly tag the pics with simple keywords (1star, 2star) and when imported to iPhoto recreate your rating system.
So, the question is really about your existing software and what it can do.
Regards
TD

Troubles with my Aperture star ratings system

Been using aperture 2 for a couple of years now. No serious problems with it at all. Then, 2 weeks ago, all of a sudden my star ratings system started playing up and I have no idea why.
The problem is strange; it is still possible for me to rate photographs from 1 to 5 stars but when i come back to that folder and try to look at my 1 star or better pics then i see them all and the ratings i have assigned them. However, if i try to look at 2 star or better or 3 star or better etc photos then my screen is completely empty and if i want to export or sort my pics i now have to do it manually which seriously interrupts my workflow.
This issue applies to all my folders in aperture and I'd appreciate any help anyone can give me. Thank you very much !!!

Try here first http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2945

How can I transfer my star ratings to my new computer?

Just bought a new Dell. I have ITunes on my old computer, and have spent lots of time creating playlists and star ratings. How can I import that into my new computer? I have a video Ipod with my complete music library on it, and when I connect it to my new computer I can listen and change the ratings, but I can't transfer the music, or any of the playlist info. Ideas?

Welcome to Apple Discussions!
Does this help?
Use Your iPod To Move Songs To A New Computer
btabz

How can I get rid of phantom star ratings in iTunes (10.6.3)? They serve no purpose that I can see.

How can I get rid of phantom star ratings in iTunes (10.6.3)? They serve no purpose that I can see. thx

After you sign in with the old ID and are presented with the option to keep the information on the iPad, you should say yes to that. Then you should be able to delete the account on the device. After you delete the account, you can - or you should be able to - sign in with the new Apple ID.
I tried these very same steps on my Pod Touch and it worked exactly the way that I'm describing. When you sign in again with the new ID, you will be given the option to merge Reminders, Bookmarks, Etc, with those in iCloud.com. I selected the option to merge all of the information. Nothing was duplicated and everything was exactly as it was before I deleted the iCloud account.
So ... sign into your new ID in Settings>iTunes & App Store. Tap the old ID and sign out. Then sign in with the new ID. Then delete the old iCloud account like I explained above and then sign in with the new Apple ID, all of your purchased content and iCloud content should be good to go.

Can star ratings assigned in Photoshop Elements 11 be viewed in Bridge? [was:Noreen needs help]

Can star ratings assigned in Photo Shop Elements 11 be seen when viewed in Bridge or visa versa, if assigned in Bridge, will they show up in Elements?If so, how is it done?

Addressing your second question, you are confusing two different things.
tiff is an image file format, as is jpeg, as is psd, as is png, as are dozens (if not hundreds, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_file_formats) of other formats.
A colour profile represents the colour characteristics of devices so that, for example, displays know how to display the colours, printers know how to print them.
Image files MAY, but do not have to, contain colour profiles.
For details:
http://help.adobe.com/en_US/creativesuite/cs/using/WS52323996-D045-437d-BD45-04955E987DFB. html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_management#Color_profiles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICC_profile
Cheers,
Neale
Insanity is hereditary, you get it from your children
If this post or another user's post resolves the original issue, please mark the posts as correct and/or helpful accordingly. This helps other users with similar trouble get answers to their questions quicker. Thanks.

Using Aperture's star rating system

Forum member mrhooper posted [something in another thread|http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=13357908#13357908] which caught my eye. I didn't have time to respond, and now that thread is marked answered -- and my reply is slightly off-topic -- so I started this new thread in the hopes of learning how better to use the star rankings in Aperture.
Below is +what I do.+ I'm very curious to find out what you do -- or to hear any suggestions for making what I do more sensible.
Here is (part of) mrhooper's comment.
So we are now bringing over everything into Aperture and then rating images on a 1, 2, 4, 5 basis. Come on, if its a 3 make a decision. Everything else is a 9, and then the rejects are deleted. And then the trash is emptied and they are out of the library.
So we bring in the raw and then quickly rate, and I can't image a 400 shoot taking much more than 5 minutes rate.
Go through once for 1, then for 2, by then the 4 is obvious and the 5 we just love anyway. 9 everything else.
Fwiw (always an auspicious start to an Internet posting), I TOTALLY agree re: the wasted gamut of the seven-level rating system (that's rejected-unrated-1-2-3-4-5).
Here's what I've settled on:
• If I look at a picture, I rate it. Reject or save-and-decide-later. That's "9" and "1". So "unrated" is meaningful to me. It doesn't mean "less than rated", and, importantly, it doesn't mean "not-rejected"; it means, literally, not-yet-rated. (The problem solved here occurs when I am part way through tossing rejects from a Project and I am interrupted.)
Immediately after import, I add a Project description, assign a Place, and Stack images taken in burst mode or with any range of exposure settings. When I rate images in a Project, the first thing I do is go through these Stacks and select the most usable image from these minor variations (I need to do this before comparing un-like images in the Project). Within any Stack, I might have rejects ("9") and saves (1-star); the "pick" of the Stack gets a 2-star rating (1-star is already in use).
• 1- and 2-star ratings +have the same value to me as images.+ The only difference is that 2-star images came from Stacks. (Those Stacks may contain 1-star images which for any number of reasons I want to retain even though they are not a Stack pick and will likely never be promoted nor processed nor printed nor published).
Now I can go through my Project and make my picks. I mark images to be developed in RED (I use the 8 color labels to track image development). All of these also get upgraded to 3- or 4-stars.
• 3-star means "keep". The general idea is that in a few years time I will likely want to do some major weeding in my Aperture orchard. Any 1- or 2-star images will then be unceremoniously deleted. 3-star images will be kept.
• 4-star means good enough for publication. One of the best of the Project.
After I develop the images in a Project, I will re-assign the star rankings. During development, some images will be promoted.
• 5-star means not only good enough to be published as one of the best of the Project (and I mean that at whatever level one works -- from emailed to friends to printed for sale), but good enough to be included in some other sampling of my work. (I keep an Album for my Portfolio. The images in the Album are selected from my 5-star images.
Note that in my use, +star ratings are Project specific+. There is no value-equivalence between the star ratings -- and I consciously try to avoid comparisons across Projects. (If I've done a shoot, I need to know which are the usable/salable shots in that shoot -- I don't need to know how they rank in my life's work.) All of the 4-star images in one Project may be of less comparative value to me than the only 4-star image in another Project.
So in my system, "Reject", "3-star", and "4-star" are the only ratings which are necessary. They correspond to the all important distinctions mrhooper indicated:
- throw-out
- keep but don't use
- use.
The other star ratings could -- and from a tidy database standard, should -- be replaced by a metadatum that is not part of the rating gamut.
The orchard floor is yours ...
Message was edited by: Kirby Krieger

Hi Kirby,
Thanks for opening this up, as I suspect most of us have gone through the "let's see that's a 1 or no... probably a 2, perhaps I can clean up the backgound and then it would be 3. " etc etc.
We settled on a similar process where you suggest it is a project by project rating, not our life's work.
So we skip 3, play with 4 and 5, that should be obvious.
1 and 2, they are going to be deleted at some stage in the future, unless it is some rare thing, and that doesn't happen every shoot.
In Jan this year looked at the 2008 year 1, 2 and deleted most of them. Hey, we hadn't used them, touched them, improved them or even thought about them. Goodbye.
Some memorabilia, sentimental value ones got to stay.
When we look for the best, then 5 is the go. Maybe a review of 4's but only if we are struggling in 5s
Which by the way we tend to be fairly generous with I suppose.
Checked a shot of 60 images early in the week, 15 are in the 4 and 5, 8 are 5.
We also use the wonderful color system. Now this sorts out a lot of things for later smart albums.
Here are a few Green-teaching. Red-for web site pages, Blue - the crown jewels, the ones we both love. Purple- spec shots for photo library etc.
Yep, sometimes a shot might be two or more colors, but it is not stopping us at the moment.
We do shoot burst, but don't stack. If its a 4 I want to be able to see it. We create albums in the project Star 4, Star 5, so there they are in a hurry. Yep, know it is easy to do that in the search box, and can use Ctlr1-5, but the clever is later when we can be really specific in search for albums with Star 5, or what ever.
Just to finish off, the 4 and 5 get keywords, lots of them. From event, to person, to specific lighting, to species, or building type or.....
want a pic of a 1937 Ford- in Blue, at the Last Cafe, in Spring, in the sunshine, front lit, side view?
That is what Aperture does.
and because of the way we use projects for each shoot, bet I could find it in about 10 seconds in quick review of the appropriate year or month as well.
This is not the thread on project names, but we have from the beginning way back in iPhoto(5) put them in as a date and description.
Cool thing now in Projects/Full Screen, is I can Filter by the date number so typing in 9012 gets me all the projects only from 2009, December. (9) 0 (12) Oh, am aware of what is going to happen when we have been round the scale once and the numbers come back. And we have a plan.
I am sure there are other ways to start a good system, to use the ratings and the keywords of Aperture, and agree that you have to think project specific when it comes to what is a 5.
Reserving 5 only for the 'very best image you ever took of a rose", is a bit limiting and what if my "Very best waterfall picture' is even better?
Thanks for starting a good ideas discussion.
Regards
DJ

How can I see my ratings when I view

I'm almost certain that as I used the viewer and the Adjustments Inspector that there was a time that my star ratings would show up below my picture.
Currently, while using the viewer (with the Adjustments Inspector open) I can hit a number 1-5 and it WILL rate it, but i CAN'T see it -- I have to switch and look at the metadata.
I've played with the Window menu, etc. No luck. Any thoughts?
Thanks!

The Y and U keys toggle the display of data overlays for the viewer and browser.
More here:
[Aperture Metadata Display|http://photo.rwboyer.com/2008/08/aperture-and-metadata-display>
RB

Ratings and keywords

How can I see only the ratings and keywords in the viewer ?
thanks

Ian Wood wrote:
Make a new metadata view which contains only the metadata you want visible. Then hit Command-J and pick that metadata view for the Viewer overlay.
There's a bit more info here:
http://www.apple.com/aperture/tutorials/#managing-showkeywords
I've tried setting this up, but the keywords don't always display. The first time I scroll through my images the keywords don't display, but if I go back over them a second time then the keywords start to show up. I've tried it with several projects and with "Viewer - Expanded" and "Captions and Keywords", but it's always the same. I have also restarted AP2 after changing the preferences.
Has anyone else noticed this?
Thanks,
Andrew

Export Masters to include star ratings, places, faces, and tags?

I have 25,000 photos at about 2.5 mb each that I have imported into Aperture. The original import file was about 60gb. The current Aperture file is about 205gb. If I export masters, I get a file that is 60gb (same aas the orignal import file. If I export versions, I get a file that is about 150gb. During import, I may have had the import adjustment preset at "quick fixes"; possibly creating a new version for all 25,000 photos.
I tried importing orignal masters with no auto adjustments ad by setting previews at lower quality and the dimensions that match my macbook pro with about a 40% change in file size.
All of my photos have now been adjusted, tagged, geo-tagged, and facial recognized. I do not want t lose that.
I am trying to export the masters to an external drive with all of my star ratings, places, faces, and tags in order to import them to a smaller file.
Once, I get all of my adjusted photos into Aperture, I do not really care about the masters.
How do I export my master files with all of the tags? Or how do I export my versions without having to keep the bloated file of 150gb instead of 60gb? What is attached to the versions that would more than double th efile size?
Thank you

Sunblock,
Once, I get all of my adjusted photos into Aperture, I do not really care about the masters.
Don't take this the wrong way, but what you are trying to accomplish goes agains the most basic design of Aperture. Aperture is intended to keep your masters safe and unadulterated, while giving you the opportunity to export your versions on demand.
If I export masters, I get a file that is 60gb (same aas the orignal import file. If I export versions, I get a file that is about 150gb.
Your versions do not take up 150 GB in the Aperture library. They take up several K for the "recipe", and then some small thumbnails and preview images. The only reason you see that the versions are 150 GB is because you exported them and looked at what Aperture generated at your request.
How do I export my master files with all of the tags? Or how do I export my versions without having to keep the bloated file of 150gb instead of 60gb? What is attached to the versions that would more than double th efile size?
Your masters are supposed to stay exactly the same as when you imported them. However, when exporting masters, you can choose, in the Metadata selection, to "Include IPTC"; this includes some of the metadata. I am unsure of the exact items it includes, though. Some of the things you can do in Aperture are not supported by general metadata formats.
As for exporting the versions, you don't get a "bloated file". Rather, you get many (25000?) files. Depending on your export preset, it is entirely possible that each exported version is larger than its corresponding imported master. Check the "Export Preset" selection when you export versions to see what format Aperture is making. There is nothing "attached" to versions. Each one is a completely independent picture file.
I am trying to export the masters to an external drive with all of my star ratings, places, faces, and tags in order to import them to a smaller file.
Not sure what you are getting at here. What do you mean by "import them into a smaller file?" Do you mean that you want to get rid of your Aperture library package (which is actually hundreds of thousands of files) and replace it with a different Aperture library which is smaller? Again, you might want to rethink this. It is not what Aperture is intended for -- you are giving up good, quality photos for something inferior. Why do you want to replace your photos with something inferior?
nathan

Star Ratings

Hello folks-
Not sure if anyone else is having this issue getting into aperture but thought I'd ask...
I'm conceptually okay with the file structure but the thing that is doing my head in is the ratings system. I wonder if this is a function of my photographic inexperience? I shoot a variety of things as a hobbyist and for my own research but not in a professional sense. I initially ignored the ratings, but have come to realize that the system is quite key to the organization of a large number of images within aperture. Now I'm reimporting all my images and rating and tagging them as they come back in.
I did some reading about ratings and was a bit daunted by the 5 pass system suggested by the manual, so decided to try the three tier system suggested by Bagelturf, i.e. *= not awful; **= good; *= proud of. I boldly waded into about a thousand photos from a recent trip to the middle east and found that this was not sufficient. The not awful photos were just that, not awful but kind of boring. The photos to be proud of, I was proud of. The majority were just two star, good images. So at the end I had a slightly smaller pile of 'okay' images. Clearly, that ratings system did not really work for me.
So now I'm considering a four tier system, adding in a 'best of project/trip/place' category in betwixt good and proud and leaving the five star category for when I get better at photography...
Would anyone else be willing to share their rating technique or ideas?
Thanks,
arthur

I agree it is important not to get too tense about how accurate any given rating is. Also, I find that ratings change over the course of reviewing a project more than once. It is not all that important!
My protocol is as follows, but I would love to hear what other folks do.
• Rejects: out of focus or otherwise technically not good.
• No stars: not reviewed yet.
• One star: too lame to show to the client but perhaps some future cut-and-paste partial usage.
• 2 stars: lame but some clients might find it useful.
• 3 stars: solid journeyman work but unexciting, maybe submit to client.
• 4 stars: good technically and compositionally, for sure submit to client.
• 5 stars: best of project.
What actually gets submitted to the client and/or used actually depends on the project, how many pix are needed and on the client. Star ratings are just a general ranking within a given project.
I find that I never know what I might want to use a pic for in the future. I know that I am capable of visually reviewing thousands of digital pix very quickly. In addition to keywords the star ratings help me refine the review process. If I am looking for trees for a background I might filter for 1 star and better, keyword trees; trees as a main ad image I might filter for 4 stars and better, keyword trees.
Another use for rankings is to determine which pix get edited. Typically 4 and above get tweaked, 3 and below do not get tweaked until a specific need for the image exists (e.g. the client likes it). However, every project is different.
-Allen Wicks

PSE8 star ratings

I think that star ratings in PSE 8 are called Star Ratings rather than "Favourites". Whatever they are called I can set them from each photo when in max sized mode, or by right-clicking then going Ratings etc.
What I dont have is these ratings visible in the navigation pane as part of the keywords hierarchy. Its a long time ago, but I think this catalogue was created by upgrading it from PSE5. Is this a known problem and/or is there a known solution?
Thanks for any help,
Mike C

99jon,
thanks for such a quick reply....
I think I understand that they are a parallel process. I seem to remember that at a point in the past they were available as part of the keyword hierarchy, and therefore could easily be used in conjunction with my own keywords to narrow the results shown in the organiser.
I now realise that what I mean is that they are not visible in the Navigator Pane. If this is not the right term, I am sorry - it seems to change from version to version.
I mean that when I have a collection of photos visble in the main window (show all), there is a pane that I can bring up on the right which shows all the keywords as a hierarchy or as a cloud.
I am sure that, at one time the Star Ratings were visible as part of that cloud/hierarchy and they are not now.
This may have happened at the same time as I migrated from 5 to 8 or not - there was alot on my mind at the time!
Mike C

Can Aperture recognize star ratings or keywords on import?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for