Can i upgade from core duo to core 2 duo

can i upgade from core duo to core 2 duo

only buy purchasing a mac that has a core 2 duo, you can not make that upgrade on your current mac.

Similar Messages

Can't upgrade from 10.8 to 10.8.1 on Macbook Pro 17" 2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

When I try and upgrade on my 2.93 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo 17" from 10.8 to 10.8.1 there is no update in Software Update/App Store.
So I have downloaded the 10.8.1 patch from http://support.apple.com/kb/DL1571 it says that my machine "OSX Update can't be installed on this disk. This volume does not meet the requirments for this update."
I had no problems updating with my iMac to 10.8.
Anyone know if this a problem or is 10.8.1 update for certain models?
Thanks in advance.

If I understand correctly you seem to be getting kernel panics. These can be caused from software and sometimes hardware. You can try the normal list of things. Reset the SMC, PMU, create a another user account and run in that account to see if the problem occurs. Also try repairing permissions from the original disc. you should also look at your battery information to see what the health of the battery is. You can do this via system profiler. I would also run Hardware test from the second install disc that came with your computer. This could help you rule out any hardware problems. Ram can be hard to troubleshoot since it can work fine one minute and not work the next. Also sometimes the hardware test can come up with false problems. I always note the problem and run the test a second time to make sure it was not a false error. If all those things do not fix the problem, I would consider doing a archive and install. This way you could rule out a software problem.
Instead of sending it in I suggest you take it to your local apple store if there is one close to you. They sometimes get repairs done faster.
Message was edited by: mac wise

Can I get iCloud if I use a MacBookPro with Intel Core Duo (not Core 2). I can't upgrade from 10.6.8 to 10.7 without a Core 2.

Can I get iCloud if I use a MacBookPro with Intel Core Duo (not Core 2)? I can't upgrade from 10.6.8 to 10.7 without a Core 2.

Lion (10.7.x) needs Core2Duo.

What is the latest Mac OS X that I can run on my 2.33 GHZ Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro?

My MBP was running the fan almost constantly and otherwise acting odd so I decided to just refresh the installation from scratch. At that time I was running Lion 10.7.5. Before rebuilding everything with that version I want to make sure running Lion on this machine isn't contributing to my issue.
What is the latest Mac OS X that I can run on my 2.33 GHZ Core 2 Duo Macbook Pro?
I have every OS release since the original purchase so I can rebuild on the one that's most stable on this laptop.

You can run Mt. Lion if you so wish:
http://www.apple.com/osx/specs/
If you want the most efficient OS, I would suggest Snow Leopard.
However I suggest doing some investigation prior to installing a new OS. First do a SMC reset:
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3964
Also run an Apple Hardware Test. Use the #2 disk on your original install disk.
If there is no improvement, post back.
Ciao.

Running OS 10.6.8 on a 3.06 GHz Intel Core i3 Mac can I upgrade from Indesign CS5 to CS6?

Running OS 10.6.8 on a 3.06 GHz Intel Core i3 Mac can I upgrade from Indesign CS5 to CS6?

They do, but what happens when the client(s) move to CC? Of course doing
so opens a new can of worms for you since 10.6.8 is unsupported for
anything later than CS6.
You should start budgeting for some upgrades sooner rather than later.

Can I upgrade a 1.83GHz Intel Core Duo iMac running Leopard OS X 10.5.8 to Snow Leopard 10.6.3?

Can I upgrade a 1.83GHz Intel Core Duo iMac running Leopard OS X 10.5.8 to Snow Leopard 10.6.3?

Yes this machine will run 10.6 with no problem
Sadly it will not be able to run 10.7 in the future though.

Going From G4s to Duo 2 Core Questions

I'm going from 2 G4's to Duo 2 Cores (shipment to arrive early next week). Three questions to those who have already done it, to avoid problems:
1) I will import my data from the G4s to the new Macs via Target Disk Mode (no Migration to avoid bringing something over that might muck up the works).
Which computer should I boot into Target Disk Mode - the source (G4) or destination (Duo 2 Core)?
Should I boot into Target Disk Mode and then firewire connect, or firewire connect and then boot into TDM?
2) I currently use Office X (Word and Entourage) as my data staple; am upgrading with the purchase of the Duo 2 Cores to Office 2004.
How do I get my Office X Word and Entourage preferences (Normal Template; Address Book, etc) into Office 2004 once 2004 is loaded? Should I install the 2004 appliication onto the Duo 2 Cores, then copy over my Microsoft User Date from Office X (from the G4's to the new computers), then launch Office 2004 on the new computers and somehow import my prefernces; if so, how? If not, what's the best procedure?
3) I use Firefox as my main browser. I do a lot of public records research. Most public records are in PDF format. I currently use the PDF Browser Plug-in (private edition) for viewing. Is that a safe option for Intel Macs? If not, any alternatives suggested?
Lots of questions, but thanks in advance for any input and assistance!
Any other suggestions on a smooth transition will also be most appreciated!
Again - Thanks and Cheers!
iMac Flat Panel Mac OS X (10.4.8)
iMac CDRW

1) I connected my new MacBook to my turned of PowerBook while the MacBook was on. Then I turned on the PowerBook booting into FireWire Target Disk Mode. BTW, I copied Library folder from my PowerBook onto the MacBook's desktop. The rest I just copied directly into my new MacBook personal directory. IOW I opened up both Document folders and copied from PowerBook to MacBook. I was more careful about what I copied from the old Library folder and I did just a little at a time so if trouble developed I could remember what I'd just copied in and remove it. This minimized the number of programs I had to reserialize and configure.
2) This is a good question - I bought MacOffice and used it with the PowerBook. I don't remember the process of moving in - whether it was done automatically or whether I was prompted for where to import files from. I just remember it being pretty painless. Perhaps the safest method would be to install Office on the old G4 first and get it all sorted out there first.
3) There's an Intel updated version of the plug-in available - I'm using it.

Can mac book,2.2 Gh Intel Core 2 Duo, be upgraded to loin or yosemite

Can mac book,2.2 Gh Intel Core 2 Duo, 2 GB 667 MH ,
be upgraded to loin or yosemite

It can only be upgraded to Lion; you should install more RAM first. Click here and order a download code for it.
Back up your data and check your applications for compatibility before upgrading. In particular, Mac OS X 10.7 and newer don't support PowerPC programs such as versions of Microsoft Office prior to 2008.
(124682)

Can't Boot a 1.83 Dual Core Mini from UBS 2.0?

Hi All,
I have a 1.83 Dual Core Intel Mac Mini and I am trying to Boot the machine from a USB 2.0 Drive.
Startup Disk sees it and lets me select it, but everytime I try to start from the USB Drive, the machine just automatically bypasses the USB Drive and always boots from the Internal Drive.
Someone mentioned that Intl Mini's *CAN ONLY BOOT* from drives formatted as "GUID PARTITION TABLE", is that correct? If so, I find that curious, because the same external drive was cloaned from and can boot an 2.26 Intel Dual Core 15 inch Mac Pro, so I figured that it should be able to boot a similar vintage Intel Machine.
Just for information: when you hold down the "option" key at startup, the USB drive (formatted as "Apple Partition Map") is not even presented as a Startup Option.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!!
Thanks
Kalagan

Hi Kay,
Thanks for the info, but one curious thing has come out of this. When my external drive was connected to the Intel Mac Pro via Firewire 400, I could boot the Laptop from the external Firewire Drive even though it was formatted as "Apple Partition Map", but the same drive connected to the same computer would not boot the machine when connected via USB 2.0.
So, it looks like Intel Macs don't require GUID Partitioning to boot, if you are connected via Firewire, but they do need the GUID Partitioning scheme when you are trying to Boot from a USB 2.0 drive??
Interesting??
Thanks
Kalagan

Satellite L655-149 - Can I upgrade from Intel Core i5 to i7?

Hi everybody,
I have Satellite L655-149 Satellite. Can I replace the processor from Core i5 to Core i7 and how?
Thank you.

Hey,
Theoretically you can upgrade the CPU but if you do this you will loose your warranty and everything happens on your own risk. Furthermore its not supported from Toshiba that means nobody can say if the new CPU would work properly or not.
You should check this article:
http://aps2.toshiba-tro.de/kb0/FAQ35006D000RR01.htm

Java Development issue/differences between Core Duo and Core 2 Duo (??)

Hi Everyone,
I am a Java developer that uses my 17" MBP Core Duo for all of my development. Lately, I've been trying to use both the Glassfish Application Server V2 (from Sun) and Maven 2.09 from the Apache project. I have configured identical scenarios on my MBP Core Duo and on a 15" MBP Core 2 Duo.
The scenario involves compiling and running some webservices (at least on the Core 2 Duo) in a local development environment. Both machines use the default JDK 1.5.0_13 installed on the machine.
On the 17" Core Duo, issuing a "mvn install" command produces the following error:
[INFO] Compiling 1 source file to /Users/john/downloads/soabook-code-20070504/chap07/endpoint-provider/modules/en dpoint/target/classes
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Fatal error compiling
Embedded error: Prohibited package name: java.lang
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 12 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Sep 05 07:09:06 CDT 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 9M/17M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Running Maven with the "-e" switch turned on produces the following stacktrace:
org.apache.maven.lifecycle.LifecycleExecutionException: Fatal error compiling
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecyc leExecutor.java:564)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalWithLifecycle(De faultLifecycleExecutor.java:480)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoal(DefaultLifecycl eExecutor.java:459)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoalAndHandleFailure s(DefaultLifecycleExecutor.java:311)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeTaskSegments(Default LifecycleExecutor.java:278)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.execute(DefaultLifecycleExe cutor.java:143)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.doExecute(DefaultMaven.java:334)
at org.apache.maven.DefaultMaven.execute(DefaultMaven.java:125)
at org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli.main(MavenCli.java:280)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.ja va:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launchEnhanced(Launcher.java:315)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.launch(Launcher.java:255)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.mainWithExitCode(Launcher.java:430)
at org.codehaus.classworlds.Launcher.main(Launcher.java:375)
Caused by: org.apache.maven.plugin.MojoExecutionException: Fatal error compiling
at org.apache.maven.plugin.AbstractCompilerMojo.execute(AbstractCompilerMojo.java: 498)
at org.apache.maven.plugin.CompilerMojo.execute(CompilerMojo.java:114)
at org.apache.maven.plugin.DefaultPluginManager.executeMojo(DefaultPluginManager.j ava:443)
at org.apache.maven.lifecycle.DefaultLifecycleExecutor.executeGoals(DefaultLifecyc leExecutor.java:539)
... 16 more
Caused by: java.lang.SecurityException: Prohibited package name: java.lang
at java.lang.ClassLoader.preDefineClass(ClassLoader.java:534)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:669)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:56)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.IsolatedClassLoader.loadClass(IsolatedClassL oader.java:56)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(ClassLoader.java:374)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:675)
at java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:124)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.defineClass(URLClassLoader.java:260)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.access$100(URLClassLoader.java:56)
at java.net.URLClassLoader$1.run(URLClassLoader.java:195)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:188)
at org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.IsolatedClassLoader.loadClass(IsolatedClassL oader.java:56)
at org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler.compileInProcess(JavacCompiler .java:398)
at org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler.compile(JavacCompiler.java:141 )
at org.apache.maven.plugin.AbstractCompilerMojo.execute(AbstractCompilerMojo.java: 493)
However, the exact same software setup on the Core 2 Duo produces this result (which I would expect on the Core Duo):
[INFO] Installing /Users/john/Downloads/soabook-code-20070504/chap07/endpoint-provider/pom.xml to /Users/mjhart/.m2/repository/soabook/chap07-endpoint-provider/1.0/chap07-endpoi nt-provider-1.0.pom
[INFO]
[INFO]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] CHAP07-ENDPOINT-PROVIDER-WSDL2JAVA .................... SUCCESS [1:35.885s]
[INFO] CHAP07-ENDPOINT-PROVIDER-ENDPOINT ..................... SUCCESS [7.221s]
[INFO] CHAP07-ENDPOINT-PROVIDER-CLIENT ....................... SUCCESS [16.525s]
[INFO] CHAP07-ENDPOINT-PROVIDER .............................. SUCCESS [1.597s]
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 2 minutes 1 second
[INFO] Finished at: Fri Sep 05 07:07:23 CDT 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 16M/30M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have installed the same software versions and have the same configuration on a Windows desktop running XP SP2 and get the same successful result.
Is this an issue between the Core Duo and Core 2 Duo? I can't see that it is since I don't believe the hardware influences the software to that degree. However, I am at a loss for what is causing the issue and the Apache Maven list insists that there are developers that are using Maven successfully on OS X.
I really need to get past this issue, but I am at a loss. Please help.
Thanks,
John

Have you repaired permissions? (/Applications/Utilities/Disk Utility.app)
Are you sure you're using JDK 5? (Applications/Utilities/Java/Java Preferences.app or output of $ javac -version)
--greg

Intel Core 2 Duo or Core Duo???

Greetings! I have a 17" MacBook Pro that I purchased last August 2006. How can I tell if it has the Intel Core 2 Duo or Core Duo processor?? Apparently, there is a difference in the maximum memory that can be installed: 3 GB for the Core 2 Duo and only 2 GB for the Core Duo. Any know how to determine the processor type?
Thanks & God Bless!
Rick

i was only half serious about the rumour sites thing.. actually you're the perfect example of someone that has the right attitude to making a computer purchase. you understand that all manufacturers including apple aren't about to start yelling from the rooftops that a machine will be replaced with a faster one coming up in a couple of weeks. it just makes no sense to freeze the sales of the current machine prematurely, and people know they can always pick up remaining stock of the outgoing model at a reduced price after the new one is announced. you've also stated that while the new machines seem a little faster (well duh what's new under the sun?), you're happy with the performance of the one you have, and it does what you need it to do.
I think it's only ever a good idea to keep the most casual eye on the rumour sites, just to get an inkling of any possible new developments. but it's pretty much a dumb idea to base your shopping on what they say. in my case, I waited for the core 2 duo machine because I happened to be looking to buy one literally just when is started making the tech news that the core 2 duo chips for laptops were making their way into machines, and some PC laptops were already shipping with them. it seemed the sensible thing to do to wait a couple of weeks before placing my order, and I was in a position where I could wait anyway. i also knew that I'd be waiting at least a couple of weeks if not more for any machine I ordered to be shipped because I was always going to order a custom configuration anyway. so in my case it paid off.
but I read a lot of people putting off buying a machine for frankly silly reasons, fed by the rumour sites. a lot of audio pro logic users (like myself) are fixated on the idea of waiting for the next generation intel portable chips because of a combination of some kind of power **** fed by the rumour sites. and also a lot of them are also PC users, and so they are terrified that whatever they buy now might be a bad choice because leopard is around the corner and it might change the ballgame, causing problems with machines bought earlier.. it can all be quite misleading and make you wait without a machine for no good reason. and then when you look at the intel info on what the next series of C2D chips will be, it's only a speed bump to 2.4Ghz above the 2.33 that it currently tops out at. I'm sure there are other enhancements too, but it's hardly earth-shattering. and then on top of that, there's just no way that leopard is going to have any issues at all, esp compared to vista, with recent machines, and probably not even much older ones too. in fact, sometimes it's a bad idea to buy a machine that comes pre-installed with the latest OSX because it has been the case in the past that the firmware on these machines doesn't allow them to retrograde to work with a previous OS version. this can be a big issue for some users! for example if you are an audio pro, and you use digidesign hardware, they are notorious for taking a long time to release drivers for new OS versions, and not only that, their previous drivers often just won't work at all with newer OS's until they release their newest driver, unlike other manufacturers whose drivers often survive the transition without requiring an update just to stay functional. so in cases like this, listening to the rumours too much and holding off on buying can actually be totally the wrong thing to do.
anyway, I've just had a little rant haven't I? glad you're happy with your machine, and for anyone else reading, I hope I've given a little perspective on the matter.

Restore Core Duo to Core 2 Duo?

Can I clone the drive on a Core Duo machine, and, then restore onto a Core 2 DUo and expect all to be fine?
Can I do the opposite, Core @ Duo to Core Duo?
I need to swap 2 machine, one a Core 2 Duo, and, one a Core Duo. MUST I install the OS and load all the software again, or, can I just move the drives around in essence by cloning?

The key to safely and reliably booting a computer from the installation of another computer is how closely the two match. It wouldn't be a good idea to clone a MacBook's drive and use it to book a MacPro. But the difference between your two minis is almost negligible. Go ahead - if over the course of a week or two you find the computer is unstable, you can always perform an archive and install.
Of course since you are talking about cloning, you could also just use the Migration Assistant to move your programs and data to the newer computer.

Core 2 Duo VS Core i5

Hi,
regarding to the spec Core 2 Duo VS Core i5 from a MBP, do it really a Huge Differences while using the Logic Pro 9?

spheric wrote:
Scorpii wrote:
hi spheric. 32nm will run faster because the distance is less. 4 real cores [iMacs i7] should perform better than 2 real core [laptops chips]
Thanks for the clarification - I was obviously misunderstanding you.
Yes, the desktop chips are faster due to being quad-core - but getting a quad-core 32nm laptop chip should be faster still.
Unfortunately, there aren't any yet, AFAIK.
..and there are unlikely to ever be, not in this series of CPU in any case. The problem is heat dissipation and power consumption, neither of which are anywhere near a match for what Apple is aiming at with its notebooks. However, AFAIK, you can already buy notebooks from other vendors (can't remember where I read this, CNET?) which do use the physical quad version of the core series CPU that Apple only use in the iMacs. So, you can get a 'real' quad core notebook of some kind, however it won't have anywhere near the battery life of the MBPs (who cares?), and will be in a much less slim case with probably a lot more fan noise, to deal with the heat. Also, it will only, ahem, officially run Windows or Linux or whatever. Officially.
But don't rule out HT! I know I am a bleedin broken record on this topic, but when it's used on the mobile i5/i7, it really does just present itself to the software like it's a real quad core and it really does make a difference. Not on the same order as having totally discreet cores, but it does simply work as if it was and the difference is palpable. The ProTools tests I did in that other discussion really shows it in action. When PT sends work to 4 cores (on the desktop version of the i7), it can run a good whack more plug ins than when it just has 2 cores available to it. It's a pity that Logic seems to be currently ignoring it, but on the measure I demonstrated with PT, it looks like an 'almost' quad mobile CPU is actually a pretty decent tradeoff for a notebook system for the time being, at least for every other app except Logic..
I'm sure future generations of Intel hardware will probably eventually get more discreet physical cores into a mobile CPU that Apple will be happy to use. In fact I found some articles via a google search that suggested the generation of CPUs coming sometime in 2011/2012 will be able to get power consumption and heat down to do just that. But for now, HT is a very reasonable substitute. The other day I was able to easily get about 35 more reverb plug ins to run live on the mobile i7 than I could on my Core 2 Duo and I saw HT working right before my eyes, distributing the work across 4 cores in Activity Monitor. So it's clear that HT can make a significant difference if it's used, even if it will always be a bit less than having a real quad core.
I'd say the next generation of Apple notebooks will be when the number of physical cores gets upped. For now, they won't just shoe-horn a desktop CPU into their sleek notebooks and throw out all of the battery life and slim design principles. But other manufacturers have chosen right now to do this in notebooks, even given the extra heat and power consumption, so there are alternatives out there.. I think Dell and Alienware do notebooks using a desktop i7 (ie, with 4 full cores), but from what I saw I think they chose a lower clocked one so the things don't last 5 minutes on battery and melt down after one hour of use.

I used Target mode to transfer files to a new iMac running Snow Leopard 10.6.8 from an older Dual core Intel machine (EMC 2105) also on 10.6.8. but originally Tiger 10.4. The operation was successful and I ejected the disk icon from the new machine and po

IS THE SITUATION HOPELESS
I used Target mode to transfer files to a new i7 iMac running Snow Leopard 10.6.8 from an older Dual core Intel machine (EMC 2105) also on 10.6.8. but originally Tiger 10.4. The operation was successful and I ejected the disk icon from the new machine and powered down the old machine. When this was restarted the next day there was a grey screen with flashing Mac symbol alternating with a 'no entry' sign and occasionally a question mark.Keyboard and mouse were unusable so k inserted the original instal disc (No.1 for 10.4. with installer 1.0.4) which came with the machine in 2006 in an attempt to boot from this. The ensuing window said this was not possible and now it cannot be ejected.I have tried everything ! It offers Disk Utility and other options like Terminal but that doesn't work either.I 'repaired disk' and that was pronounced o.k. None of the various keystrokes at start up will work, and the computer will only offer the installer disc continually.The only option would seem to be is to erase the hard drive completely from the disc in the machine.I don't want to do this as there is still material which I need to recover. I think the drive has in some way been corrupted by using it in target mode, and I don't know if there are any other options to try.
Please tell me how to get this disc to eject !

Graham Giles wrote:
Have you seen this type of problem before? I think it could be a serious issue for anyone in a similar position.
No; but then, I've not had occasion to use TDM. I've been using firerwire drives for over 10 years, both FW400 and FW800, with no issues except a bit of instability using a B&W G3 machine.
TDM should be safe. Using cautious, manual copying of files from the Target machine to the Host machine should not result in unexpected loss of files or damage to the Target drive's directories. It should behave exactly the same as if it were an external (to the Host) firewire drive.
• I don't suppose there is anything I can do to 'put back' lost items from a separate Time Machine drive which has an up to date backup on it.
There is probably a way to do that - seems to me that's one of the reasons for a Time Machine volume.
On the other hand, if the Time Machine volume is rigidly linked to the now-absent OS on the original drive, there may be no way to effectively access the files in the TM archive.
I know that using a cloned drive would work well in this instance.
I have no experience with Time Machine, so perhaps someone who has will chime in with suggestions.
With the machine in TDM with the other machine, have you tried running Disk Utility to see if you can effect repairs to the drive?

Can i upgade from core duo to core 2 duo

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for