Can I use bind variable instaed of writing static COLUMN Name

Hi , I am having a table containing id and column names, the data is stored against that id in other tables. Now I wish to update data into another table so that it goes into apppropriate column without using decode function.
I am trying to do this:
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'update TEST set :1 = :2
where PROJECT_ID= :3 and UNIQUE_ID= :4' using P_DEST_COLUMN, P_TEXT_VALUE, P_PROJ_ID, P_TASK_UID;
the values P_DEST_COLUMN, P_TEXT_VALUE, P_PROJ_ID, P_TASK_UID are populated using a cursor in PL/SQl
Is this statement valid? If not can you tell me how to do it as I am getting some error I am unable to comprehend.
thanks
Rishabh

Column names cannot be substituted at run-time as bind variables. If you need to specify the column name at run-time, you'd need to construct a new string and execute that string dynamically, i.e.
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'UPDATE test SET ' || p_dest_column || ' = :1 ' || ...From a data model standpoint, storing column names as data elements in another table is generally a rather poor idea. It's likely to make ad-hoc reporting nearly impossible and to cause a lot more parsing than would otherwise be required.
Justin

Similar Messages

  • Can't use bind variable in a function

    This is a repost from my earlier post at
    URGENT: Problem creating the report using Procedure
    The problem is when I bind a variable in a function, I get REP-0002. Please look at the following steps to reproduce
    ===
    set serveroutput on
    create or replace
    package Q_REP_test
    as
    type drec is record
    sdate date
    type dreccursor is ref cursor return drec;
    Procedure Get_sysdate(retdate out dreccursor);
    procedure add_days_tocurdate(no_of_days in number, retdate out dreccursor);
    end q_rep_test;
    show errors
    create or replace
    package body q_rep_Test
    as
    procedure Get_sysdate(retdate out dreccursor)
    is
    begin
    open retdate for
    select sysdate retdate from dual;
    end;
    procedure add_days_tocurdate(no_of_days in number, retdate out dreccursor)
    is
    begin
    open retdate for
    select sysdate+no_of_days retdate from dual;
    end;
    end q_rep_test;
    show errors
    ===
    Invoke the SP as follows:
    ===
    function QR_1RefCurDS return q_rep_test.dreccursor is
    tempc q_rep_test.dreccursor ;
    begin
    q_rep_test.add_days_tocurdate(:p_1,tempc);
    return tempc;
    end;
    ===
    1. Create a report
    2. create an user parameter(p_1)
    3. add a pl/sql as above
    4. run it(to verify the report works)
    5. save it.
    6. close the report
    7. Open it again, you get an as
    "REP-0002: Unable to retrieve a string from the Report Builder Message file". Now it is corrupted and can't be used at all.
    Please treat this as urgent and help me.
    Thanks

    Hi ,
    Though you have stated it as Oracle92iDS check whether it has the 9.0.2.2 patchset applied. If not please try applying the latest Patchset 9.0.2.2 for Oracle9i Reports.
    To download the patch goto Metalink <http://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_gui.startup> and search for Patch# 2842923.
    This Patchset is for iAS and iDS.
    In either case, please let me know the results.
    Thanks,
    Vinod.

  • Can we use repository variables in SQL statement of column prompt?

    Hi Dudes,
    Below is the query
    SELECT "- End Date"."End Fiscal Year" FROM "Consumer Sector" WHERE ("- End Date"."End Fiscal Year" = valueof (current_year)) or ("- End Date"."End Fiscal Year" = valueof (current_year) -1)
    when use this sql in criteria prompt getting error.
    Please suggest .
    thanks.sri

    Make sure your syntax is correct it should be like VALUEOF("CURRENT_YEAR")-1
    If you still have issues then VALUEOF("CURRENT_YEAR")-1 cast it to int before you subtract.
    If helps pls mark as correct else let share error message

  • What's disadvantages when using bind variables always in java?

    Hello everyone .. Could someone tell me what's the disadvantage when using bind variable in java ? I heard it somecases since before.. Thanks in advance!

    99% of the time, you should be using bind variables. If you have columns which are highly skewed, however, you may want to consider using literals (assuming CURSOR_SHARING=EXACT), since that may allow the CBO to make a better decision.
    If you have an orders table, for example, you may have a status column that specifies whether the order is complete, in transit, or new. If you've been running for a while, 99% of your orders will be complete, so
    SELECT COUNT(*)
      FROM orders
    WHERE status = :1should do a full table scan if you specify 'COMPLETE'. If you passed in 'IN TRANSIT', though, an index scan might be more appropriate. If you want to pass in different values and get different query plans, you need to use literals. 99% of the time, though, you want the same plan, so you want to use bind variables.
    Justin
    Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
    http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

  • Can i extract no of columns fields as by using bind variables....

    can i extract no of columns fields as by using bind variables....

    SBH wrote:
    I suppose you are asking for bind variable columns and their substituted values. You can query V$SQL_BIND_CAPTURE to view complete info about thatI've never had good luck with V$SQL_BIND_CAPTURE. Maybe its more robust since I tried on 9i several years ago; I could never find what I was looking for there :(
    Edited by: riedelme on Jul 14, 2010 6:15 AM

  • Report Using Bind Variables

    Hey Everyone,
    I'm having a bit of trouble creating a report. I need the FROM part of the code to use bind variables. I have come up with this peice of code below but im getting the following error:
    failed to parse SQL query:
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 8:
    PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "" when expecting one of the following:
    begin function package pragma procedure subtype type use
    form
    current cursor
    The symbol "" was ignored.
    ORA-06550: line 2, column 24:
    PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "" when expecting one of the following:
    begin function package pragma procedure subtype type use
    form
    current
    Can anyone see where im going wrong?
    Thanks in advance,
    -N.S.N.O.
    Code*
    DECLARE
    x VARCHAR2 (4000);
    BEGIN
    x := x || 'select *';
    x := x || 'from ';
    x := x || :p13_schema;
    x := x || '.ddl_log@';
    x := x || :p13_db_name;
    x := x || '_DBAAPEX.TNTEWW.COM';
    RETURN (x);
    END;

    Hey Roel and Daylocks,
    After getting frustrated for a while i deleted the page and started again. I put in the exact same code and it worked just how i wanted in the first place :S
    The only thing i did different is when i was creating the report region the first time around i used a normal SQL query, For Example:
    select sysdate from dual;
    Then i modified it to
    DECLARE
    x VARCHAR2 (4000);
    BEGIN
    x := x || 'select ';*
    x := x || 'from ';
    x := x || :p14_schema;
    x := x || '.ddl_log@';
    x := x || :p14_db_name;
    x := x || '_DBAAPEX.TNTEWW.COM';
    RETURN (x);
    END;
    Whereas on the second attempt i used the peice of code in question straight away. Its been a bit of a frustrating morning because i used a similar peice of code for a different application, nevermind tho :)
    Thanks for your replys, much appreciated.
    -N.S.N.O.

  • Query don't use the right index when using bind variables

    Hi people !
    I need some help because I have an issue with a query that don t use the right Indexes as it should
    First of all, I have mainly three tables :
    ORDER : Table that contains description for each Order (approximately 1 000 000 Records)
    ORDER_MVTS : Table that contains the tasks made (called movements) to set up each Orders
    with quantity of packages prepared for each product (approximately 10 000 000 Records)
    PRODUCT : Tables that contains the products (approximately 50 000 Records)
    When I launch the query with hard coded values, it brings back response very fast
    because it uses the right index (ORDER_DHR_VALID) which represent the date and hour of the order
    (with format 'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'). The selectivity for this index is good.
    NB 1: I have to use the trick " >= Trunc(date) and < trunc(date) +1 " to filter on a simple date because
    the index contains hour and minutes (I know it wasn't probably a bright idea at conception time).
    NB 2: The index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE is'nt discriminating enough because there is'nt enough different products.
    It's the same for index on CUSTOMER_CODE and on MVT_TYPE so only the index on ORDER.DHR_VALID is good.
    Here is the correct explain plan when I execute the query with hard coded values :
    SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
    FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
    WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'))
    AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(to_date('14/11/2008 10:04:56','DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS')) + 1
    AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
    AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
    AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
    AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS'
    AND PRODUCT.CODE = 1234
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 SORT AGGREGATE
    2 NESTED LOOPS
    4 NESTED LOOPS
    2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
    4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
    777 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 378119) --> ORDER_DHR_VALID
    2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
    30 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377784) --> ORDER_MVTS_ORDER_FK
    Now the problem is when the query is used in a Cursor with bind variables.
    It seems like Oracle don't use index on ORDER.DHR_VALID because he can't figure out that he have
    to actually filter on a short period of time (only one day).
    So Oracle uses the index on ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE which is'nt a bright idea (it takes 10 secondes instead of just one)
    Here is the bad explain plan :
    Rows Row Source Operation
    1 SORT AGGREGATE
    2 NESTED LOOPS
    722 NESTED LOOPS
    2 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378548) --> PRODUCT_PK
    722 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER_MVTS
    1790 INDEX RANGE SCAN (object id 377777) --> ORDER_MVTS_PRODUCT_FK
    2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID ORDER
    1442 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN (object id 378439) --> ORDER_PK
    Now I have found two solutions to this problem :
    1) using a Hint to force the use of index on ORDER.DHR_VALID (with /*+ INDEX(ORDER ORDER_DHR_VALID) */ )
    2) Using Dynamic SQL and keeping the date hard coded (but not the other values except mvt_type)
    For example :
    QUERY :=
    'SELECT SUM(ORDER_MVTS.NB_PACKAGE)
    FROM ORDER_MVTS, PRODUCT, ORDER
    WHERE ORDER.DHR_VALID >= TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) '||
    AND ORDER.DHR_VALID < TRUNC(TO_DATE('''||To_char(P_DTE_VAL,'DD/MM/YYYY')||''',''DD/MM/YYYY'')) + 1 '||
    AND ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY'
    AND PRODUCT.CODE = ORDER_MVTS.PRODUCT_CODE
    AND ORDER_MVTS.ORDER_CODE = ORDER.CODE
    AND ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = :CUSTOMER
    AND PRODUCT.CODE = :CODE ';
    These two solutions work but Number 1 is bad in theory because it uses a Hint
    and Number 2 may be difficult to code.
    So my question is : Does someone knows another solution to force the use of index ORDER_DHR_VALID that can be simple and reliable.
    Thank you very much for support
    Edited by: remaï on Apr 1, 2009 4:08 PM

    What version of oracle you have? CBO work is different in 9i and 10g.
    Usually cost based optimizer do not want to use index for >< condition with binding variables because optimizer can not use statistic to determine selectivity, and by default selectivity of <> operators is low.
    (As I remember '>' selectivity by default is 5%, you have two conditions > and <, therefore resulting selectivity will be 0.05*0.05=0.0025 as two independent events, but selectivity of other conditions
    ORDER_MVTS.MVT_TYPE = 'DELIVERY' or ORDER.CUSTOMER_CODE = 'ADIDAS' looks much better for CBO)
    The best solution I see is do not use binding variables. Actually your query looks as searching query, which executes not so often, therefore you will not have perfomance win along of skipping execution plan creation.
    Edited by: JustasVred on Apr 1, 2009 10:10 AM

  • Using Bind Variable in a SELECT

    Hi,
    I'm trying to build up my SQL query at run-time using bind variables and in the Oracle® Fusion Middleware Fusion Developer's Guide for Oracle Application Development Framework 11g Release 1 (11.1.1) it says that 'After defining the bind variables, the next step is to reference them in the SQL statement. While SQL syntax allows bind variables to appear both in the SELECT list and in the WHERE clause, you'll typically use them in the latter context, as part of your WHERE clause.'.
    However, when I try to use the bind variables in my SELECT list because I've had to set a type for the variable to String the variable gets inserted with inverted commas either side e.g. SELECT 'Service' FROM TestTable. Is it possible to use bind variables to insert a value into my select list without these inverted commas around it?
    Thanks in advance,
    Tom

    OK, thanks for your response. Do you know of a way then where I can control my SELECT parameters programmatically? I'm currently trying to do it using the information in the chapter '35.9 Using Programmatic View Objects for Alternative Data Sources' from the Oracle® Fusion Middleware Fusion Developer's Guide for Oracle Application Development Framework 11g Release 1 (11.1.1). I think I'm part way there, would this be the correct way of acheiving what I want?
    Cheers, Tom

  • Trying to pass array to stored procedure in a loop using bind variable

    All,
    I'm having trouble figuring out if I can do the following:
    I have a stored procedure as follows:
    create procedure enque_f826_utility_q (inpayload IN f826_utility_payload, msgid out RAW) is
    enqopt dbms_aq.enqueue_options_t;
    mprop dbms_aq.message_properties_t;
    begin
    dbms_aq.enqueue(queue_name=>'f826_utility_queue',
    enqueue_options=>enqopt,
    message_properties=>mprop,
    payload=>inpayload,
    msgid=>msgid);
    end;
    The above compiles cleanly.
    The first parameter "inpayload" a database type something like the following:
    create or replace type f826_utility_payload as object
    2 (
    3 YEAR NUMBER(4,0),
    4 MONTH NUMBER(2,0),
    83 MUSTHAVE CHAR(1)
    84 );
    I'd like to call the stored procedure enque_f826_utility_q in a loop passing to it
    each time, new values in the inpayload parameter.
    My questions are:
    First, I'm not sure in php, how to construct the first parameter which is a database type.
    Can I just make an associative array variable with the keys of the array the same as the columns of the database type shown above and then pass that array to the stored procedure?
    Second, is it possible to parse a statement that calls the enque_f826_utility_q procedure using bind variables and then execute the call to the stored procedure in a loop passing new bind variables each time?
    I've tried something like the following but it's not working:
    $conn = oci_pconnect (....);
    $stmt = "select * from f826_utility";
    $stid = oci_parse($conn, $sqlstmt);
    $r = oci_execute($stid, OCI_DEFAULT);
    $row = array();
    $msgid = "";
    $enqstmt = "call enque_f826_utility_q(:RID,:MID)";
    $enqstid = oci_parse($conn, $sqlstmt);
    oci_bind_by_name($enqstid, ":RID", $row); /* line 57 */
    oci_bind_by_name($enqstid, ":MID", $msgid);
    while ($row = oci_fetch_array($stid, OCI_RETURN_NULLS+OCI_ASSOC))
    ++$rowcnt;
    if (! oci_execute($enqstid)) /* line 65 */
    echo "Error";
    exit;
    When I run this, I get the following:
    PHP Notice: Array to string conversion in C:\Temp\enqueue_f826_utility.php on l
    ine 57
    Entering loop to process records from F826_UTIITY table
    PHP Notice: Array to string conversion in C:\Temp\enqueue_f826_utility.php on l
    ine 65
    PHP Warning: oci_execute(): ORA-06553: PLS-306: wrong number or types of argume
    nts in call to 'ENQUE_F826_UTILITY_Q' in C:\Temp\enqueue_f826_utility.php on lin
    e 65
    PHP Notice: Undefined variable: msgnum in C:\Temp\enqueue_f826_utility.php on l
    ine 68
    Error during oci_execute of statement select * from F826_UTILITY
    Exiting!

    Thanks for the reply.
    I took a look at this article. What it appears to describe is
    a calling a stored procedure that takes a collection type which is an array.
    Does anyone from Oracle know if I can pass other database type definitions to a stored procedure from PHP?
    I have a type defined in my database similar to the following which is not
    an array but a record of various fields. This type corresponds to a payload
    of an advanced queue payload type. I have a stored procedure which will take as it's input, a payload type of this structure and then enqueue it to a queue.
    So I want to be able to pass a database type similar to the following type definition from within PHP. Can anyone from Oracle verify whether or not this is possible?
    create or replace type f826_utility_payload as object
    YEAR NUMBER(4,0),
    MONTH NUMBER(2,0),
    UTILITY_ID NUMBER(10,0),
    SUBMIT_FAIL_BY VARCHAR2(30),
    MUSTHAVE CHAR(1)
    );

  • Performance when using bind variables

    I'm trying to show myself that bind variables improve performance (I believe it, I just want to see it).
    I've created a simple table of 100,000 records each row a single column of type integer. I populate it with a number between 1 and 100,000
    Now, with a JAVA program I delete 2,000 of the records by performing a loop and using the loop counter in my where predicate.
    My first JAVA program runs without using bind variables as follows:
    loop
    stmt.executeUpdate("delete from nobind_test where id = " + i);
    end loop
    My second JAVA program uses bind variables as follows:
    pstmt = conn.prepareStatement("delete from bind_test where id = ?");
    loop
    pstmt.setString(1, String.valueof(i));
    rs = pstmt.executeQuery();
    end loop;
    Monitoring of v$SQL shows that program one doesn't use bind variables, and program two does use bind variables.
    The trouble is that the program that does not use bind variables runs faster than the bind variable program.
    Can anyone tell me why this would be? Is my test too simple?
    Thanks.

    [email protected] wrote:
    I'm trying to show myself that bind variables improve performance (I believe it, I just want to see it).
    I've created a simple table of 100,000 records each row a single column of type integer. I populate it with a number between 1 and 100,000
    Now, with a JAVA program I delete 2,000 of the records by performing a loop and using the loop counter in my where predicate.
    Monitoring of v$SQL shows that program one doesn't use bind variables, and program two does use bind variables.
    The trouble is that the program that does not use bind variables runs faster than the bind variable program.
    Can anyone tell me why this would be? Is my test too simple?
    The point is that you have to find out where your test is spending most of the time.
    If you've just populated a table with 100,000 records and then start to delete randomly 2,000 of them, the database has to perform a full table scan for each of the records to be deleted.
    So probably most of the time is spent scanning the table over and over again, although most of blocks might already be in your database buffer cache.
    The difference between the hard parse and the soft parse of such a simple statement might be negligible compared to effort it takes to fulfill each delete execution.
    You might want to change the setup of your test: Add a primary key constraint to your test table and delete the rows using this primary key as predicate. Then the time it takes to locate the row to delete should be negligible compared to the hard parse / soft parse difference.
    You probably need to increase your iteration count because deleting 2,000 records this way probably takes too short and introduces measuring issues. Try to delete more rows, then you should be able to spot a significant and constant difference between the two approaches.
    In order to prevent any performance issues from a potentially degenerated index due to numerous DML activities, you could also just change your test case to query for a particular column of the row corresponding to your predicate rather than deleting it.
    Regards,
    Randolf
    Oracle related stuff blog:
    http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/
    SQLTools++ for Oracle (Open source Oracle GUI for Windows):
    http://www.sqltools-plusplus.org:7676/
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/sqlt-pp/

  • ORA-01722: invalid number caused with SQL using bind variable

    Hi,
    Im am hoping that someone can help me resolve a problem thats only just services and is being experienced on quite a few clients.
    our application uses C++ exes and makes OCI calls to the database.
    what has happened in the last week or so, there has been quite a few invalid number errors being received on a prod server but strangly enough we cannot reproduct the error on our UAT system.
    The sql is using bind variables and the information in the trace file shows that a number is being used for the bind variable, here is an extract from one trace file:
    for some schemas, the bind variable value is some currupted value, i think:
    oacdty=01 mxl=32(21) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
    oacflg=03 fl2=1206001 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
    kxsbbbfp=9a8d62b8 bln=32 avl=03 flg=05
    value="Â*d"
    but on another schema, the value used is:
    Bind#0
    oacdty=01 mxl=32(32) mxlc=00 mal=00 scl=00 pre=00
    oacflg=03 fl2=1206001 frm=01 csi=178 siz=32 off=0
    kxsbbbfp=c5f92718 bln=32 avl=04 flg=05
    value="2101"
    however both produce invalid number errors.
    I am relatively inexperienced as a DBA so would appreciate as much help as i can get.

    Could you post your sql statement that is being run.
    Also post the query plan from your uat system and the one from your production system (They are likely to be different)
    You can export the stats from your production system and run them in your uat system. If you do this, then the execution plans should be the same on both systems(dbms_stats) and if you have the same data you should run into the same problem on uat as in production.
    The root cause of this type of problem is having a column in a table which holds values which are of different datatypes. Typically there is a condition in the where clause which indicates that for example only numeric columns should be retrieved from the column which holds multiple data types. However since the optimizer is free to rewrite the query any way it sees fit, (It does not necessarily execute in the order the sql statement is written) it does not filter this data first, and therefore you hit non-numeric data and run into the invalid number error.
    You can use little techniques like using an inline view with rownum in the column list, to perform the first filter. This ensures that the inline view is executed on its own, rather than being merged (materialized) with the rest of the query.
    A quick temporary solution is to use a comparison like to_char(column_name) = variable
    Make sure your comparisons are correct and it doesn't negatively impact on performance of the query

  • How to use Bind Variables in Essbase data control

    Hi,
    I am trying to use Bind Variables in MDX query while creating the Essbase Data Control. I have used the below query with the Bind Variable.. this query is working in Essbase admin console..but it is throwing error (*Invalid MDX Query)* while creating Essbase Datacontrol in JDeveloper.
    MDX Query : SELECT {[Measures].Msr_2} ON COLUMNS, [Time].Children ON ROWS FROM cube
    where ($name)
    Could any body suggest me on how to use bind variables with Essbase Data control.
    Thanks,
    Swathi

    Hello Swathi, can you please help me how you created Essbase DataControl? Also were you able to figure out this?
    Thanks, Praveen.

  • BUG ? :  ADF creating extra VO instance using bind variables in a LOV query

    ADF 11.1.1.1.0
    After "playing around" with bind variables Setting bind variables in view objects for LOV I've come across something strange that I've reproduce using the HR schema and tables Employees and Departments. Its a bit long but here goes :
    Using the HR schema tables departments and employeesI'm trying to create a LOV (selectOneChoice) for the
    employee department, the LOV having a bind variable that limits the values returned in this case returning only DepartmentId = 50
    I've create a VO lovDepartment (not based on an EO) with the following query :
    SELECT Departments.DEPARTMENT_ID,
           Departments.DEPARTMENT_NAME,
           Departments.MANAGER_ID,
           Departments.LOCATION_ID
    FROM DEPARTMENTS Departments
    where DEPARTMENT_ID  = :pDeptIdA LOV has been defined on the DepartmentId attribute of the EmployeesView.
    The lovDepartmentImpl overrides the executeQueryForCollection to set the bind variable value.
        @Override
        protected void executeQueryForCollection(Object object, Object[] object2,
                                                 int i) {
            setNamedWhereClauseParam("pDeptId", "50");       
            super.executeQueryForCollection(object, object2, i);
        }When using an ADF form to create a new employee the DepartmentId lov is empty.
    Enabling SQL tracing shows the following :
    [370] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, pDeptId, null)
    [371] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.execute caused params to be "un"changed
    [372] Column count: 4
    [373] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 ViewRowSetImpl.doSetWhereClause(-1, pDeptId, null)
    [374] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 ViewRowSetImpl.setNamedWhereClauseParam(pDeptId, 50)
    [375] ViewObject: _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 Created new QUERY statement
    [376] _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1>#q computed SQLStmtBufLen: 235, actual=195, storing=225
    [377] SELECT Departments.DEPARTMENT_ID,
           Departments.DEPARTMENT_NAME,
           Departments.MANAGER_ID,
           Departments.LOCATION_ID
    FROM DEPARTMENTS Departments
    where DEPARTMENT_ID  = :pDeptId
    [378] Bind params for ViewObject: _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1
    [379] For RowSet : _LOCAL_VIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0
    [380] Binding null of type 12 for "pDeptId"
    [381] No Resource Bundle found but null value id:LOV_DepartmentId_LOVUIHints_NullValueId is defined in an ListBinding Definition.It would seem that 2 lovDepartment instances are used one at line 370 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0
    and one at line 374 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1
    The one at line 374 LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1 gets the variable bound at line 374
    however LOCALVIEW_USAGE_model_EmployeesView_lovDepartment1_0 gets a null value and would explain the empty LOV
    Can anybody explain what is happening here ? (and how to use bind variables in LOV queries)
    Regards
    Paul
    (bump)
    Edited by: Paul (MITsa) on Jul 14, 2009 10:46 AM
    I've now tried all types of LOV from ChoiceList to Radio groupe by testing the application module - none of them work.....
    Edited by: Paul (MITsa) on 14-Jul-2009 22:52

    when you rinvoke executeQueryForCollection the bind variables are allready set and they exist in Object[] object2 method parameters.
    in order to change them you need something like:
    private void changeGenericBindVariable(Object[] params, String paramName, Object paramValue) {
    for (int i = 0; i < params.length; i++) {
    if (paramName.equals(((Object[])params)[0].toString()))
    ((Object[])params[i])[1] = paramValue;
    * executeQueryForCollection - overridden for custom java data source support.
    protected void executeQueryForCollection(Object qc, Object[] params,
    int noUserParams) {
    changeGenericBindVariable(params, "pDeptId", "50")
    super.executeQueryForCollection(object, object2, i);
    But its better to set bind variables before you executeQueryForCollection. like when you invoke LOV.
    For cascading LOVs and the problems i have check:
    [http://adfbugs.blogspot.com/2009/07/jdeveloper-11-r1-cascading-lov-bugs.html]

  • Query taking too long when using bind variable

    Hi All,
    There is a query in our prod DB which runs very slow (approx 2 hours) when it uses Bind Variables (using JDBC thin client), and when i try passing the variable using TOAD/SQL developer it runs fine.
    Explain Plan for running Query
    SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 146 Bytes: 379 Cardinality: 1                                                   
         21 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 146 Bytes: 379 Cardinality: 1                                              
              20 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 145 Bytes: 379 Cardinality: 1                                         
                   17 HASH JOIN Cost: 22 Bytes: 42,558 Cardinality: 123                                    
                        15 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 15 Bytes: 8,910 Cardinality: 27                               
                             12 FILTER                          
                                  11 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 9 Bytes: 316 Cardinality: 1                     
                                       8 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 8 Bytes: 290 Cardinality: 1                
                                            5 NESTED LOOPS Cost: 6 Bytes: 256 Cardinality: 1           
                                                 2 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_INCREMENTOR Cost: 4 Bytes: 28 Cardinality: 1 Partition #: 9 Partition access computed by row location     
                                                      1 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_INC_IDX_01 Cost: 3 Cardinality: 1
                                                 4 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS Cost: 2 Bytes: 228 Cardinality: 1      
                                                      3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_KEY Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1
                                            7 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS Cost: 2 Bytes: 34 Cardinality: 1           
                                                 6 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_KEY Cost: 1 Cardinality: 1      
                                       10 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_COUNTERPARTIES Cost: 1 Bytes: 26 Cardinality: 1                
                                            9 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.PK_CPTY Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1           
                             14 BUFFER SORT Cost: 14 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 32                          
                                  13 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE GDP.GDP_CITIES Cost: 6 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 32                     
                        16 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE GDP.GDP_AREAS Cost: 6 Bytes: 2,304 Cardinality: 144                               
                   19 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_PORTFOLIOS Cost: 1 Bytes: 33 Cardinality: 1                                    
                        18 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.PORTFOLIOS_KEY Cost: 0 Cardinality: 1                               
    Explain Plan for Slow Query
    Plan
    SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 11,526,226 Bytes: 119,281,912 Cardinality: 314,728                                                   
         21 SORT ORDER BY Cost: 11,526,226 Bytes: 119,281,912 Cardinality: 314,728                                              
              20 HASH JOIN Cost: 11,510,350 Bytes: 119,281,912 Cardinality: 314,728                                         
                   2 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_PORTFOLIOS Cost: 1,741 Bytes: 177,540 Cardinality: 5,380                                    
                        1 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.PORTFOLIOS_KEY Cost: 14 Cardinality: 5,380                               
                   19 HASH JOIN Cost: 11,507,479 Bytes: 87,932,495,360 Cardinality: 254,140,160                                    
                        3 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE GDP.GDP_AREAS Cost: 6 Bytes: 2,304 Cardinality: 144                               
                        18 MERGE JOIN CARTESIAN Cost: 11,506,343 Bytes: 18,602,733,930 Cardinality: 56,371,921                               
                             15 FILTER                          
                                  14 HASH JOIN RIGHT OUTER Cost: 3,930,405 Bytes: 556,672,868 Cardinality: 1,761,623                     
                                       5 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_COUNTERPARTIES Cost: 6,763 Bytes: 892,580 Cardinality: 34,330                
                                            4 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.PK_CPTY Cost: 63 Cardinality: 34,330           
                                       13 HASH JOIN OUTER Cost: 3,923,634 Bytes: 510,870,670 Cardinality: 1,761,623                
                                            10 HASH JOIN Cost: 2,096,894 Bytes: 450,975,488 Cardinality: 1,761,623           
                                                 7 TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_INCREMENTOR Cost: 2,763 Bytes: 52,083,248 Cardinality: 1,860,116 Partition #: 14 Partition access computed by row location     
                                                      6 INDEX RANGE SCAN INDEX GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_INC_IDX_01 Cost: 480 Cardinality: 334,821
                                                 9 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS Cost: 1,734,205 Bytes: 8,320,076,820 Cardinality: 36,491,565      
                                                      8 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_KEY Cost: 104,335 Cardinality: 39,200,838
                                            12 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID TABLE GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS Cost: 1,733,836 Bytes: 1,331,145,696 Cardinality: 39,151,344           
                                                 11 INDEX FULL SCAN INDEX (UNIQUE) GDP.GDP_FX_DEALS_KEY Cost: 104,335 Cardinality: 39,200,838      
                             17 BUFFER SORT Cost: 11,499,580 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 32                          
                                  16 TABLE ACCESS FULL TABLE GDP.GDP_CITIES Cost: 4 Bytes: 448 Cardinality: 32                     
    How can I avoid that.
    Thanks

    Hello
    Could you reformat your execution plans because they aren't particularly readable. The forums allow you to preserve the formatting of code or output by putting the symbol {noformat}{noformat} before and after the section of text you want to preserve formatting for. 
    If you write
    {noformat}select * from v$version
    {noformat}
    it will be displayed asselect * from v$version
    So can you run this above statement and post the output here so we know the full oracle version you are working with?  And finally, it would be really helpful to see the query you are running.  When you say it runs fine in Toad, is that when you replace the bind variables with the values or are you also using bind variables in Toad?
    Cheers
    David                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

  • Using Bind Variables in Parameter Form's Query

    I want to use bind variables in the query of Parameter form. But
    it does not allows. What is the other way out. The structure of
    my Parameter form is as under:
    State:
    Customer:
    Now I want that I want to list only those customer in the
    Customer LOV which belongs to the selected state.
    Thanks.
    Muhammad Nadeem

    Can we just link to an oracle form using a url still as we can with reports? I've built a report that requires the user to select from a dynamic list as well, and I know how to do this through forms, but can I simply call the form from a webpage?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Random Keyboard and Trackpad Freeze

    This has happened twice for me so far. I startup my Macbook and for whatever reason I can't use the keyboard or trackpad. Only the power button works. Both times I held down the power button to force shutdown and then started up again. Everything wor

  • Wrong support on hard disk failure?

    My iMac had been getting progressively slower (applications would lock up with the spinning wheel for minutes at a time before letting me do anything). After one such lockup, I hard booted and the iMac didn't come back - just stuck at a grey screen w

  • Acrobat X Standard - slow to open

    Good morning; I am working to resolve an issue with Acrobat X Standard (10.1.5).  It appears that loading stamps when Acrobat opens causes a timely delay, depending on the number and size of stamps files.  This has not previously been an issue with 8

  • Problem while querying from java

    I have a query like this ... Select name,description,start_date from Events where TO_CHAR(start_date,'MM/DD/YYYY')='09/19/2004'; I want to execute the same query using java for which i say String QQQ="Select name,description,start_date from Events wh

  • Hide or disable buttons in the ribbon

    How do you hide a button for a specific library?   I'm trying to hide the Upload Document button.  Users still need to be able to create new documents, just not upload them. The solutions I've found are saying to create a Site Feature.  But wouldn't