Can Multiple users work on the same work Repository ?

I have master repository and work repository on one machine, can multiple developers connect andwork on the same work repository? how?

oh Yes!
it is v simple.
follow the steps:-
once master and work repository has been created on a system.U just need to know all the information supplied wen creating a login to designer.
like user name and password of database,url,driver as well as master's repository uname and password.
if u have the following information with you,then u can create a new login with designer provided all the above information and u will have full access to designer
in work repository u want to connect

Similar Messages

How to prevent multiple users from updating the same data in coherence

Hi,
I have a Java Web Application and for data cache am using coherence 3.5. The same data maybe shared by multiple users which maybe in hundreds. Now how do I prevent multiple users from updating the same data in coherence i.e. is there something in coherence that will only allow one user a time to update. If one user is in a process of updating a data in coherence and some other user also tries to update then the second user should get an error.
Thanks

I have a question on the same line. How can I restrict someone from updating a cache value when I a process is already working on it. I tried locking the cache key but it does not stop other process to update it , it only does not allow other process to get lock on it.

The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file. Does Snow Leopard Server File Sharing (AFP) provide similar features?

The Windows SMB feature has file locking if multiple users are accessing the same file. Does File Sharing (AFP) on Snow Leopard Server provide similar services?

Were you ever able to solve this problem. I'm having similar issues since upgrading to snow leopard. Four macs connect to a Windows Server 2003 for shared files. Each user has full permissions & when we "get info" it shows read & write permissions. Two of the computers were running 10.4, two were running 10.5. Everything worked properly until upgrading to snow leopard. Some files let me copy, move, delete. Others either just hang up or we get a "no permission" error. Also getting a "pdf is in use" error, even when the file/folder doesn't contain a pdf. We had our IT rep check the server who said everything is in working order. They don't represent macs any longer but feel that it's a mac problem. I would have to agree since this problem only started after the upgrade, and the one machine that was not upgraded (still running 10.5.8) is not dealing with these problems.
Lastly, I would install 10.5 back on all of the computers if I could, but the leopard disk that came with one of the computers wouldn't work with the 2 machines running 10.4 and I didn't see it available at the apple store. I'll buy it if it's still available, but why wouldn't the disks that I have work?
Thanks for any help

Multiple users\passwords on the same website with Safari

Coming over from Netscape for MAC to Safari.
Here is the issue-- In Netscape I was able to have multiple users/passwords for the same website page. Netscape controls its users/passwords; not the keychain. With Safari everytime I try to enter the second user/password this wipes out the first user and password.
Is there a way with Safari to have mutlple users/passwords for the same website page?
Thanks,
Reed

A service might call the other one.

Synchronizing multiple user accounts on the same computer

We bought a .mac family pack. Synchronizing 3 computers works great. But we cannot synchronize our 5 family member's multiple user accounts on the brand new iMac G5. Can it be true that synchronizing does not work between different user accounts on the same computer? To be able to do this was the prime motivator to buy a .mac family pack. Please someone tell us that we are doing something wrong!?
Cheers, Leo
PowerBook G4 Mac OS X (10.4.3) iMacG5 and G3

Leo,
I seem to be having better luck with what I think you are trying to do. Let me describe my situation.
I have accounts for my wife and I and each of our children on each of our several Macs.
For my wife's accounts (on each of the Macs) and my account (on each of the Macs) I enabled syncing via the preference pane. I did not sync the mail accounts (she has different e-mail accounts) but we did sync the addresses, bookmarks and such. We did not sync the calendars since we each "subscribe" to each others calendar.
On each machine and across the machines our "sync'd" information appears properly synchronized.
Now, here is one difference, I do NOT have a family pack. I only have my single .Mac account and I use that one account as the .Mac account for my wife and I. Now that I think about it, that would seem to be the big difference.
Might I suggest that you go into your wife's account and change her .Mac information to be YOUR information and see if it synchorizes.
Regards,
Tom

Multiple users pointed to the same location as their "Home Folder"

One of the things we need to be able to do for out work is share folders. We are project based and do not want to store the projects in the users "eDirectory User" home folder. We made some initial test assigning two users to the same "Home Folder" and shared a folder and had multiple accounts both internal and external pick-up and drop off files in the folder.
While it appears to work, I wanted to find out if there are downsides in having 20-30 people with the same Filr "Home Folder". What are the potential "gotchas". Security (internal) isn't an issues since these network locations are accessible by all the users anyway.
Daniel Wells AIA, VCP
Senior Associate | IT Coordinator
MHTN Architects, Inc.
Direct: 801.326.3215 | www.mhtn.com
vision made real

Hi!
Gotchas?
Well, it essentially does exactly what it is supposed to do.
(BTW, i have tested this with Filr 1.0.1 some time ago, if 1.1 behaves
differently this would bw a MAJOR product change.)
Given:
Two internal Users A+B with the homedirs pointing to the exact same path
\\Server\Dir
One external User c@tld
* User A logs in and creates a directory X and shares it with contribute
rights to c@tld.
* User c@tld logs in and creates a file X\file
* User B logs in, see a folder X and the file with A as the author. The
folder IS NOT shared to everyone (at least as far as user B is concerned,
the user does NOT set the sharing details of user A)
* User B shares the same folder X with c@tld with view only rights.
* User c@tld clicks the link from User B and IS NOT able to contribute.
* User c@tld is puzzled and calls User A asking why his rights have been
revoked.... etc. etc.
* User B has the (for him readonly) data somewhere else and calls the folder
X obsolete and deletes it.
* User A and c@tld are really pissed off.... etc. etc.
* User c@tld has several different links with potentially different rights
all pointing to the same physical location...
etc.
Again, it does exactly what it is supposed to do - from a technical point of
view, but this might not be what the users/organization can
handle/expect...
Georg
>>> Daniel Wells<[email protected]> schrieb am 05.11.2014 um 20:54 in
Nachricht <[email protected]>:
> One of the things we need to be able to do for out work is share
> folders. We are project based and do not want to store the projects in
> the users "eDirectory User" home folder. We made some initial test
> assigning two users to the same "Home Folder" and shared a folder and had
> multiple accounts both internal and external pick-up and drop off files in
> the folder.
>
>
>
> While it appears to work, I wanted to find out if there are downsides in
> having 20-30 people with the same Filr "Home Folder". What are the
> potential "gotchas". Security (internal) isn't an issues since these
> network locations are accessible by all the users anyway.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Daniel Wells AIA, VCP
> Senior Associate | IT Coordinator
> MHTN Architects, Inc.
> Direct: 801.326.3215 | www.mhtn.com
> vision made real

Can multiple people post on the same shared photo stream?

Is there a way to have multiple people post on the same shared photo stream?
My cousin would like to have a single shared photo stream where we can both post photos on it and comment, instead of having two separate shared photo streams.
We think that there should be an option for the album creator to give access to anyone he/she shares it with to enable them to also post pics on the same stream.

The only link I have is to manage your team account http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1460939?tstart=0
The only Adobe program/process for team work that I know of is Adobe Anywhere, but that requires a very different process
Adobe Anywhere http://www.adobe.com/products/adobeanywhere.html
http://www.creativeimpatience.com/adobe-anywhere-enterprise-solution/

Can multiple APEX application use the same parsing schema?

Hi,
I have 4.2 APEX thru pl/sql Gatewat, 11gr2 DB and using theme 24.
Due to the APEX limitation for version control I would be splitting 1 big ERP applications into 24 different APEX applications and each application would be considered as 1 unit for version control.
I have about 800 tables and I would assume that all of these would need to be stored in 1 schema since a lot of these table are linked thru FK.
Can I have multiple APEX APPS using the same parsing schema? or is there a better way to do this?
Thanks in advance!

Hi,
Multiple applications can have same (one) parsing schema.
You can test that on e.g. apex.oracle.com, where normally you have only one schema and you create multiple applications and all use that same schema.
Regards,
Jari
My Blog: http://dbswh.webhop.net/htmldb/f?p=BLOG:HOME:0
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jariolai
Edited by: jarola on Jan 28, 2013 7:15 PM

How to make Adobe acrobat feature to convert SAP Pages to PDF available for multiple users connected to the same server

We have installed Adobe Acrobat X Pro- English,Francais,Deutsch version 10.1.9 in our test environment and tried testing it for converting SAP pages into PDF with a few pilot users. In doing so we faced a challenge, where only one user at a time can use Adobe Acrobat PRO to convert SAP pages in to PDF.As long as the first user who is connected to Adobe Acrobat Pro via SAP isn’t logged off, other users connected to the same server are not being able to get the “Save As” dialog box to save the PDF in their preferred location.
This is a business requirement and we need an urgent solution for the same. Can anyone help us in telling us if this is possible and if yes the how to go about?

It's not something we deal with here, the LiveCycle products are a different world. Key points: Adobe LiveCycle is a range of products, some desktop, some server. LiveCycle PDF Generator is the one you should look at, it comes in 3 editions. License terms are by negotiation. Key management is via its Java API.

Can two user accounts on the same mac share the Address Book

My wife and I have separate user accounts on the same Mac but we would like to share the same Address Book. I have searched the forums to no avail. It seems silly to use .mac to do so, and a needless expense when the information is already on the same computer.

David M.F. Chapman wrote:
My wife and I have separate user accounts on the same Mac but we would like to share the same Address Book.
That's not possible. you have to use Mobileme if you want to share the address book.
I have searched the forums to no avail. It seems silly to use .mac to do so, and a needless expense when the information is already on the same computer.

Working with multiple user accounts on the same folio/article

Hi,
i have the follwing issue:
- User A owns the folio (the one that publsihes it), the folio is shared with user B and C
- User B is the graphics designer. He does the Artwork
- Usee C should do the textutal corrections
Problem:
- User C cannot access the Articles User B has created
Question: What is the right solution for this kind of problem? Two (or more) people should be able to work on an article using their personal account. The only solution I see at the moment is to create a specific "designer-account" per folio project that all these people share.
Are there any other options
cheers
Thomas

Thanks for the quick responses.
The sharing of the data is not the problem, in fact, cloud storage can be one of the solutions. But regardless, if people work on different locations or in the same intranet, it can always happen, that designer B goes on holiday and there needs to be done a change on one of the articles inside the folio that B has been working on. It is a pitty, that Designer C cannot take over and do the changes without either having to have user/password of B or "destroying" the folio settings, removing the article completely and re-entering it drom scratch (with all correct settings, namings etc) what makes B having to do the same, as soon as he comes back. This might also have to do with the absolute path references used in folios instead of logical ones (every user can set as "folioroot" on his computer) what also would make the dropbox (or adobe cloud) approach work, as everybody would share the same subfile structure and could "jumpstart" working on the folio.
Nevertheless, thanks for the answeres, things work as they do. I was just wondering if I am doing something wrong.
We will now create shared working users per project, so everybody involved in the project will use that user.
Thomas

Multiple users found with the same name

Hi,
In my ADF bean, I am trying to access some users from ldap. I found there are two users with the same email in my console under "Users and Groups" tab.
I am getting the following error in logs:
oracle.jbo.JboException: multiple users found with same name
        at com.castandcrew.portal.am.StartPaperworkCenterAMImpl.setStartPaperworkApprovalHistory(StartPaperworkCenterAMImpl.java:627)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
        at oracle.adf.model.binding.DCInvokeMethod.invokeMethod(DCInvokeMethod.java:657)
        at oracle.adf.model.binding.DCDataControl.invokeMethod(DCDataControl.java:2143)
        at oracle.adf.model.bc4j.DCJboDataControl.invokeMethod(DCJboDataControl.java:3114)
        at oracle.adf.model.binding.DCInvokeMethod.callMethod(DCInvokeMethod.java:261)
   at oracle.adf.model.bc4j.DCJboDataControl.invokeMethod(DCJboDataControl.java:3114)
        at oracle.adf.model.binding.DCInvokeMethod.callMethod(DCInvokeMethod.java:261)
        at oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUCtrlActionBinding.doIt(JUCtrlActionBinding.java:1635)
        at oracle.adf.model.binding.DCDataControl.invokeOperation(DCDataControl.java:2151)
        at oracle.jbo.uicli.binding.JUCtrlActionBinding.invoke(JUCtrlActionBinding.java:740)
        at oracle.adf.controller.v2.lifecycle.PageLifecycleImpl.executeEvent(PageLifecycleImpl.java:402)
        at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.model.binding.FacesCtrlActionBinding._execute(FacesCtrlActionBinding.java:252)
        at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.model.binding.FacesCtrlActionBinding.execute(FacesCtrlActionBinding.java:210)
        at com.castandcrew.portal.view.bean.startpaperwork.StartPaperworkCenterManagedBean.handleRowDisclosure(StartPaperworkCenterManagedBean.java:696)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
        at com.sun.el.parser.AstValue.invoke(AstValue.java:187)
        at com.sun.el.MethodExpressionImpl.invoke(MethodExpressionImpl.java:297)
        at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXComponentBase.broadcastToMethodExpression(UIXComponentBase.java:1300)
        at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXTable.broadcast(UIXTable.java:263)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.UIXTable.broadcast(UIXTable.java:147)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.rich.data.RichTable.broadcast(RichTable.java:404)
        at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXCollection.broadcast(UIXCollection.java:148)
        at org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXTable.broadcast(UIXTable.java:280)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.UIXTable.broadcast(UIXTable.java:147)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.rich.data.RichTable.broadcast(RichTable.java:404)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.UIXRegion.broadcast(UIXRegion.java:148)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent$1.run(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:93)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent._processPhase(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:361)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent.broadcast(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:96)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.UIXInclude.broadcast(UIXInclude.java:102)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent$1.run(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:93)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent._processPhase(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:361)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.ContextSwitchingComponent.broadcast(ContextSwitchingComponent.java:96)
        at oracle.adf.view.rich.component.fragment.UIXInclude.broadcast(UIXInclude.java:96)
        at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.broadcastEvents(LifecycleImpl.java:1018)
        at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl._executePhase(LifecycleImpl.java:431)
        at oracle.adfinternal.view.faces.lifecycle.LifecycleImpl.execute(LifecycleImpl.java:194)
        at javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:265)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:301)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(TailFilter.java:27)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:57)
        at oracle.portlet.client.adapter.adf.ADFPortletFilter.doFilter(ADFPortletFilter.java:34)
        at weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(FilterChainImpl.java:57)
I am wondering how open ldap can allow two users with same email.
Any suggestions are welcome.can i try some work around for that?
Thanks.

Hi.
For some reason you have duplicates. Normally is something strange but it can occurs in heavy load / database corruptions or other situations.
You should contact a LDAP Administrator in order to find and fix the duplicate problem.
Regards.

File sharing across multiple user accounts on the same machine

Hello,
I try to figure out how multiple users (my wife and I) on the same mac can have equal access to files on the local drive without granting that access to all users on that machine or even the rest of the world.
My research sofar hasn't come up with a satisfying solution. Here are the solutions that I am looking at:
1. Enable a permission system that ensures access to both users in all cases (file/directory creation, copy and move).
I only found a suitable solution for creating and copying files/directories but not for moving them.
See the following articles for reference:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/20787617#20787617 Setting up a shared structure that works e.g. for iPhoto Library but not for moving files to and from
https://discussions.apple.com/message/4005647#4005647 Helpful information on POSIX Permissions, ACL's an Permission inheritance
This would be my first choice if I can get around the problem of moving files...
2. Disk Image
Create a disk image which ignores persmissions and set permissions for the file that contains the image instead.
Read this article to get further details: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1198
This solution will work but has a few disadvatages:
There's no mutual access from multiple user accounts since an image may only be mounted by one user at a time.
One has to create a startup script that mounts the image upon login which would create a first come first serve for access to the image content.
3. Using a file sharing protocol (e.g. afp or smb) locally.
The idea behind it is to have a server providing the files mutually to multiple users one the same machine. At them moment this seems to be the most promising approach to me.
Unfortunately I can get acces from another machine but not from the same machine. Has anyone ever tried to access the file sharing (afp or smb) from the same machine on which the server is located?
Has anyone got some helpful hints for me?
Thanks in advance.

Sorry, but you didn't specify details, and it was worth checking whether or not you had overlooked this approach.
The problem you're having (as I suppose you already know) is that any new disk item inherits the permissions of the folder it is originally created in in. These permissions (sensibly enough) need owner or administrator permission to change once they've been established; that will happen when you copy a file to a new location (because that's essentially creating a new file) but not when you move it. any of the following would work:
changing the permissions on newly created files for both users so that they all explicitly give r/w access to a particular group.
writing a droplet that would change the permissions of files dropped on it and move them programmatically to the shared folder
set up a folder action or launchd job that would watch the shared folder and automatically convert permissions on files placed in it.
The last would be the approach I would take, but... which appeals to you?

Sharing a library between multiple user accounts on the same PC

I have an XP pc setup for the kids and each has their own login so they can have their own bookmarks, shortcuts, desktop, etc. They each have an iPod and use iTunes. I want them to share the same music library so that when one downloads or rips a song, It's available to each of them. Using the default installation, it is currently not working the way I want it to. Is what I'm describing possible? If so, how do I configure it?

You need to have all the music stored in a shared folder.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1203
If you move all the files around with Win Explorer, itunes will lose the paths to the files. It might be best to move everything to the shared folder and have them start over with a blank library (new ratings, playcounts)
The last lines in that article state
+When another user of the computer has imported new music from CD, repeat steps 6 through 8 to add the music to your library.+
You might want to use a little program like "itunes folder watch" to do it automatically for you.

How can multiple users edit and access same ACCESS file

Hello,
We have 2 access files and multiple users needs to edit and access those files.
How can I enable mulitple access but only one user can edit rest of users are in read-only mode for one file and multiple access and edit on the another file.

Hi,
You should split your database in a front and backend. Then create two seperate front ends which you can distribute. If you need readonly you can opt for two options, setting the attributes of the file to read only or create a front end with read only forms.
The last one takes a little more work but is safer than setting the attributes to read only because people can change that back themselfs.
Maurice

Can Multiple users work on the same work Repository ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for