Can Oracle8i be installed on 64-bit file systems(XFS or JFS)?

Any successful stories?

Hello,
My client currently has CSM 3.3.1 SP2. Does this support Hyper-V? And if not will Hyper-V be supported on CSM 4.0?
Thank you,
Nicos

Similar Messages

  • I can't download/install iTunes 64 bit for Win7! It keeps telling me my install is for 32 bit even tho I checked 64 bit!  What now?

    I can't download/install iTunes 64 bit for Win7! It keeps telling me my install is for 32 bit even tho I checked 64 bit!  What now?
    I hope my wife's 100s of songs havn't been deleted!
    What now?Tom

    Well...  after several hours, I have now downloaded iTunes 10.5.2 for Windows (64 bit)...  but now I can't connect my iPod to my PC.
    Thank you for any and all suggestions.  Tom

  • HT2305 I have Widows 8 but my Itunes wont open I keep getting a message "Itunes software does not install on 64 bit operating system"

    I have a Widows 8 laptop. I cant open Itunes. I get a message "Itunes software does not install on 64 bit operating system" Can anyone tell me how to get it installed?

    If you are referring to Vista Support, It may be after the new year before it fully supports vista. I have not upgraded to vista yet but I was thinking about it!

  • Unbootable Solaris 10 x86 installed on ZFS root file system

    Hi all,
    I have unbootable Solaris 10 x86 installed on ZFS root file system. on an IDE HDD
    The bios keep showing the msg
    DISK BOOT FAILURE , PLEASE INSERT SYSTEM BOOT DISK
    please note :
    1- the HDD is connected properly and recognized by the system
    2- GRUB don't show any messages
    is there any guide to recover the system , or detail procedure to boot system again
    Thanks,,,

    It's not clear if this is a recently installed system that is refusing to boot OR if the system was working fine and crashed.
    If it's the former, I would suggest you check the BIOS settings to make sure it's booting from the right hard disk. In any case, the Solaris 10 installation should have writting the GRUB stage1 and stage2 blocks to the beginning of the disk.
    If the system crashed and is refusing to boot, you can try to boot from a Solaris 10 installation DVD. Choose the single user shell option and see if it can find your system. You should be able to use format/devfsadm/etc to do the actual troubleshooting. If your disk is still responding, try a `zpool import` to see if there is any data that ZFS can recognize (it usually has many backup uberblocks and disk labels scattered around the disk).

  • OS X could not be installed on your computer File system verify or repair failed

    Downloaded OS X Yosemite update through Apple Store and attempted to install it on my mom's 2013 21" iMac running OS X 10.9.5.
    However, a few minutes into the process I received this message:
    OS X could not be installed on your computer
    File system verify or repair failed. Quit the installer to restart your computer and try again.
    Tried restarting several times to no avail. Ran disk utility and saw:
    Invalid node structure.
    File system check exit code is 8.
    Error: This disk needs to be repaired.
    Repair disk button not available for Mac HD, but is available for 1TB Apple HDD. Is there any way to abort the OS X Yosemite installation?

    TThe Disk Utility cannot repair the disk it resides on. The way I get around this is to use an external hard disk as my startup disk and run did utility from that. Most time then the primary disk on your iMac can be repaired.

  • How to fix "A 32-bit agent is installed on 64-bit operating system" alerts

    Hi
    We have installed SCOM 2007 R2 CU1 in our environment (by properly following installation sequence given on the CU1 web page). After manually installing agent update of CU1 on 64 bit servers, we are getting alerts "A 32-bit agent is installed on 64-bit
    operating system" and the status of these 64-bit servers remains in Warning state. We have manually uninstalled and reinstalled 64-bit agent as well as 64-bit CU1 agent update but still the status is in Warning state. We can not completely uninstall cluster
    node agent, remove it from the console and reinstall agent from scratch because SCOM R2 is not allowing to do clean uninstall and reinstall of agent on cluster nodes.
    If anyone faces similar problem and have fixed it then please let me know the solution so i can also fix the issue.
    Thank you
    HRP
    Thanks & regards, H R Parikh

    This new(er) monitor is set to generate when the registry key "HKLM\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Microsoft
    Operations Manager\3.0\Setup" is found on a 64-bit Windows server. We have several alerts like this as well, but found it had little to do with the CU1 patch and
    more to do with rolling out the updated Operations Manager management pack (v6.1.7599.0) at around the same time as well as the server having had a 32-bit agent previously installed at one point or another. We are looking into simply removing the 32-bit
    key, but have not done so just yet as we need to test this theory on a dev server first. Of course, to be safe, we could always uninstall the agent and patch, delete the keys manually, and then reinstall.
    Hope that helps.
    Larry

  • My Macbook Pro can't detect or read my CDFS file system external HDD

    My Macbook Pro can't detect or read my CDFS file system external HDD

    Open Disk Utility and see if the USB drives show in there. If they don't then it is a USB port or bus problem. If they do show in disk utility are they formatted in either Mac extended or a Windows format?

  • Can i format ipod classic with NTFS file system on win7?

    can i format ipod classic with NTFS file system on win7?

    Not if you want to have an iPod as opposed to an ordinary external drive.
    (60693)

  • 10G Database install on Linux 64bit File system Vs. Automatic Storage

    Hi,
    I'm installing Oracle 10G on a Dell 2950 server with an Intel 64 bit processor. The operating system is Red Hat Linux 4. It has a hardware RAID.
    I've downloaded the Install Guide but I have a question about installing.
    I'm confused about the File system vs. Automatic Storage management option. I will be installing on the local system, I will not be using a NAS or SAN.
    Under Database Storage Options, the guide says that "Oracle recommends that the file system you choose be separate from the file systems used by the operating system or the Oracle software.".
    1. Do I need to do that since I'm already using hardware RAID??
    2. Which way is recommended / what do most people do: File system or Automatic Storage managment??
    3. For Automatic Storage Management I read that I'd have to create an ASM Disk group that can consist of "a multiple disk device such as a RAID storage array or logical volume. However, in most cases disk groups consist of one or more individual physical disks". Do I need to reconfigure my partitions ??
    I just need some input on what I should do since this is my first time installing Oracle on Linux.
    Thank you.

    Besides documentation there's a step-by-step guide :
    http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/smiley_10gdb_install.html#asm
    Many questions should be answered here.
    Werner

  • HT2963 When I repair permissions, get one reading that can't be repaired.  "Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAg ent" has been modified and will not be repaired."  What does this mean?

    When I repair permissions in disk untilities, I get one result that cannot be repaired: 
    Warning: SUID file "System/Library/CoreServices/RemoteManagement/ARDAgent.app/Contents/MacOS/ARDAg ent" has been modified and will not be repaired.
    I recently had a new hard drive installed by Apple, after mine failed.  The permissions seem to get out of whack quite often, and I get the message above.
    Can you please tell me what may be going on?

    For more information, see:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1448
    Regards.

  • Automated install Arch x86_64 root-file system the "Raspberry" way..

    Dear Archers,
    I am currently deeply interested in installing Arch as dual boot on my
    current x86_64 system.
    And yes, there is plenty information regarding this subject in Arch wiki's.
    However...
    I would like to automate the installation the "Raspberry-Pi" -way.
    Details on the "Installation tab" of:
    http://archlinuxarm.org/platforms/armv6/raspberry-pi.
    As you can see, the installation steps are easy to automate, in my opinion.
    That's why I wrote an automation script for this purpose..
    The information further suggests that there is a root-filesystem for
    Arch named: 'ArchLinuxARM-rpi-latest.tar.gz.'
    Unfortunately, I don't think this root system will function on x86_64 systems..
    So I researched if there was a root filesystem for Arch x86_64 and found filenames like 'root-image.fs.sfs' 'core.db' 'core.img'.
    But I'm unsure if these archives/images really contain a rootfilesystem similar to the ArchARm system.
    Therefore my question:
    Does anybody know if there is a similar root filesystem for x86_64 so I can reproduce the "rpi-way" installation for x86_64 systems?
    Kind regards,
    Kees Epema

    You are definitely not going to be able to simply dd arch to your machine unless you create an image to do so.  Even then, that image would become old and stale pretty quickly, possibly leading to problems getting the system up to date.
    In my opinion, the raspberry pi way to simply dd'ing an image to an SD card is a disservice to the ArchlinuxARM users.  Though seemingly the proper way to get a system running on a raspberry pi, it masks the install process and leaves the user without a clue as to what would have gone into creating the system.
    Go read the beginners guide.  Use a virtual machine to practice if you need.  Shortcuts are not going to help you with Arch.

  • CS5 install on case-sensitive file system - can't choose different drive (Mac OS)

    I just upgraded my macbook pro to a new drive and 10.6, and chose 'case sensitive' HFSX, 'cause I'm a heavy command line user and wanted the maximum BASH experience.
    I'm trying to install the CS5 demo to try some web design tools, and the installer immediately says "Installation to case-sensitive drives is not supported. Please choose a different drive location to install." So case-sensitive drives aren't supported; crappy but fair enough.
    The error message leads me to think that I can just choose a non-case-sensitive drive to install to, but I never get a chance to pick one - I click on the installer and it goes straight to the error message.
    So - how do I pick a different drive to install to? Am I just an idoit, is there no way to select a different drive, or will it not install on a system that even BOOTS from a c.s. drive, regardless of the format of the drive that CS5 is installed to?
    I called the support number, and the poor fellow on the other end suggested I re-download the demo, and if the new download fails call Apple support to report my 'drive error'.
    I'm hoping to avoid an entire backup-reformat-restore and lose CLI compatibility just to try some demo software.
    ch

    That is part of why I would prefer case sensitive by default.   I know some server packages do the folding for you, same as some web servers do not differentiate between 'htm' and 'html' when people type in requests, but most of the time the backend server is going to be case sensitive and it is not safe to assume (or hope) that the service will fix things.  Compensating for mistakes is fine, but allowing such silent corruption is not a terribly laudable things and it encourage people be careless.
    Every once in a while I do encounter someone submitting some work where their configuration values and file names do not match, and 'well my laptop silently fixes it for me since it does not care' is a poor excuse.  And if I sent broken filenames upstream or even worse commit them to be used on a server, that is a pretty significant professional failure.
    Back to Adobe specifically, I have been trying the suggestion on poster mentioned in where one installs the Adobe applications to a case insensitive drive then copy over the installed files.  This does not quite work out of the box, but for reasons I would be hard pressed to believe are Apple's fault.
    For instance the first error I encounter is the inability of Bridge to load:
    "@executable_path/../Frameworks/WRServices.framework/Versions/A/WRServices"
    When I go look inside the app directories I can see that in Bridge the file has been named 'awrservices', but in Illustrator it is correctly named AWRServices.   So it looks more like a problem in whatever version control they are using.  The only way I can picture (which my adminitialy limited knowledge of what I am sure is a large and complex project with all sorts of legacy issues) that the installer toolchain factors in as a problem is if they have mismatches in their own scripts/packaging and have been depending on HFS's bad behavior to hide the problem.  I can understand not wanting to invest the time to pay down the technical debt on such an issue, but having such errors in your configuration causes long term headaches.
    And I say this as someone who worked on just such a project, moving a software suite that had legacy code stretching back longer than Adobe has existed as a company.  This conversion included moving from a case insenstive filesystem to a case sensitive one and yeah, there were lots of problems that the old FAT32 system hid from us, but it really paid off over the long run to fix them rather than try to twist the code to compensate.
    Having said that, if the problem is really that they do not want to go update their filenames (in version control or config files), then you can always add folding to your loaders.  I have had to do that a few times due to upstream people developing on case insensitive systems and sending data files with incorrect file names.  This is an old class of problem, and while I can empathize with the struggles project managers have trying to get approval for paying down technical debt, the problem never gets better on its own and usually gets worse.
    Which is why I responded with so much grump to the 'I never needed it' argument since that is exactly the type of customer comment that marketing tends to point to in order to push such things off the schedule.  This is the type of thing where the customer does not really know what they want because they are already accustomed to broken behavior and most of the problems are hidden from their immediate view.  It is easy to cover up the limitations since modern UI (and their search capabilities) can handle this. 
    It is not just arcane developers stuff, and it is the same transition that people have made with things like spaces, quotes, and parentheses, where years ago users believed they had no need for them since they were not using them, but they were only not using them because they did not work.   Today try to tell a modern user they can not put (, ", ) or even ' ' in their filenames and they would rightly question why this piece of obvious functionality is not working since today they are used to it working and no longer automatically compensate for it.
    I also find it ironic that by default OSX hides a number of file extensions, so from the user's perspective you can have multiple files with the exact same name displayed to them, so you can get display issues where 'foo' is the same as 'foO' if both have .txt, but 'foo' and 'foO' are not the same if one has .txt while the other is .pdf.  Add to this confusion cases like 'foo.txt' and 'foo.pdf" both being shortened to 'foo'.

  • Restoring a new mac from a backup can i only install some programs and files? Dont think there is enough memorie on the mac air

    I might be buying a new macbook air to go traveling with.. i have a macbook pro already and want to restore from the backup onto the new macbook Air but am not sure if there is enough memorie on the air... Can i restore from the back up and only put on certain files and programs.. I only really want my photoshop and dont have the serial code anymore..

    When using Migration Assistant or Setup Assistant you can only choose all or none of the Applications. You have a little more flexibility about the files in your account(s).
    What I did when I had to migrate from my MBP to the MBA was to use SuperDuper! to create a clone backup of my MBP. Then I deleted the programs and files (mostly music and video) I didn't intend to put on the MBA. Then when the MBA arrived I used Setup Assistant to migrate everything.

  • Can't open install flash player.exe file

    I have no idea if this is typical, but my computer (windows xp) has dowloaded the install_flash_player.exe file as a pf file, and Windows won't let me simply open it. Should I go on the web looking for the software to open it or can I get it download in some other way?
    Thanks.

    Hi, is it From: fpdownload.macromedia.com? This doesn't need to be opened. You SAVE it to your Desktop(you'll need to find it)
    Not sure what you are trying to do. You need to post back your PC info, browsers you use and versions. Have you Uninstalled first? There are new Revised Instructions out from Adobe, so you may want to follow them.
    Thanks,
    eidnolb

  • Installing The Oracle Internet File System

    i can't connect internal on linux

    Answer to questiosn:
    To restore the setting reinstalling the kernel source/headers (maybe headers are enough 'cos if I'm right you have to modify .h files only).
    To recompile the kernel (read it completely before you start to do anything!):
    0. became root user
    1. cd /usr/src/linux (I assume that you have only one kernel source installed the version you are using as you boot kernel right now)
    2. make dep; make clean (maybe you don't need to execute these but to make sure everything gets recompiled)
    3. make zImage (or make bzImage if the first fails because the compilation will say that your kernel is too big; it's not a real error!)
    4. make install
    5. reboot
    If everything was OK, then you should have your new kernel booting, but I would advise you to make a backup of your old kernel (I won't describe it how to do it, it would be a lengthy message).
    BTW, I don't know why Oracle says that you should recompile the kernel, it works without it too.
    Morc.

Maybe you are looking for