Can solaris x86 support VT82C694X dual processor motherboard?

As the subject.
Thanks.

Glad to hear!
I am unsure if this is a supermicro bios issue or on Oracle's side.. I'll probably end up opening a ticket in both locations. I love the super-micro boards so and their barebone systems are used for most of my system builds. However I did not notice this behavior with the AMD boards I used in VM Hosts even though they are also supermicro. So maybe its a Solaris VT-D implementation issue.
Are you seeing a message from Solaris at boot that says "Bios miss-represents the presence of IOMMU"? I get that on some of the systems that exhibit this issue, yet there there is no doubt that they DO have IOMMU capabilities.

Similar Messages

Can Solaris 11 support Solaris 8/9 container?

Dear all,
I am new to Solaris 11. I know that Solaris 10 SPARC can support Solaris 8/9 container.
So, Can Solaris 11 SPARC support Solaris 8/9 container?
Wait for your feedback.
Mike

Hi Mike
For future reference, this may not be the best forum to use for Solaris Zones related questions... but, in this case, legacy branded zones (Solaris 8, Solaris 9, and Linux) are only supported on Solaris 10. This is documented here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23824_01/html/E24456/glhcg.html
John

Can I put a dual processor in my power mac g5 which only has one processor right now

Can I put a g5 dual processor into my power mac g5? I have a power mac G5 but it only has one processor so I wanted to upgrade to the G5 dual processor found in the later version power macs. Would I be able to do this? If i could do this would i need another fan or other parts? I was also thinking of putting more ram in and another hard drive. PLEASE HELP

Exactly what to do with ram and video is hard to say without the model details. You can go to http://www.everymac.com and click on Power Mac G5 and then find the machine you have. The detailed info on the machine will show how much and what type of ram you can put in (I always use ram from either OWC, http://www.macsales.com or Crucial, http://www.crucial.com) and also gives the installed video card info. OWC would also be a good source to see what video cards are available that will work with that logic board.

Dual Processor Board??

I AM STARTING TO BUILD MY NEW SYSTEM AND WANTED TO GO DUAL PROCESSORS, ONLY REASON BEING I PLAY LOTS OF GAMES AND I ALSO DO 3D ANIMATION. I AM ALSO THINKING OF GOING WITH ONE OF THE 3D LABS WILDCAT GRAPHICS CARDS AND "MASS" RAM.
ANYWAYS I HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR A DUAL PROCESSOR MOTHERBOARD AND I HAVENT BEEN ABLE TO FIND ONE. I AM LOOKING FOR TOP OF A TOP OF LINE BOARD HOPFULLY ONE WITH 800 FSB AND SUPPORTS DDR RAM 400 ALTEAST. THE ONLY DUAL BOARDS I HAVE FOUND ARE LIKE P2 AND P3, BUT I AM LEANING TOWARDS AN AMD FX-51 PROCESSOR RIGHT NOW.
ANY INFO OR SUGGESTIONS WOULD BE AWSOME. THANKS EVERYONE!!!

Hi,
Look under the Server/Workstation boards....
But they only support 1 FX....for Dual support you need the Opteron 2xx series...

Installing Beehive on Solars x86

Hi,
I wonder if it is possible to install beehive on an x86 Solaris box. In particular I would like to install it into a zone. I understand this is currently unsupported, but is it possible?
Günther

Unfortunately, there is no Solaris x86 support for Beehive at this time. You can run the database for Beehive on Solaris x86 I believe, but the Beehive Application Tier needs to be run on Linux or Windows x86 or Solaris Sparc.
richard

Labview and AMD 760 MPX Dual Processor Chipset?

Anyone have any experience with Labview on a dual processor motherboard with the AMD 760 MPX chipset [and, of course, Athlon MP 32-bit CPUs]?
Any gotchas? Any known incompatibilities?
On the hardware side, has anyone had any problems with NI-DAQ or NI-DAQmx?
Any info would be most appreciated. Thanks!
PS: Especially interested in opinions of e.g. Tyan Tiger MPX -vs- ASUS A7M266-D [or any other boards you're familiar with]. Thanks again!

It's years I use 6533 high speed digital i/o making 2mhz output without problems on any hardware.
Today I'm trying to use a Tyan Tiger MPX (double AMD)and .....it doesn't work at all. It's surely a problem with the pci bus, dma and bus master. The total speed is 200KB/sec instead of the desired 2MB/sec. I tryied more than one serial number so the problem is a motherboard's design problem.
I dont use labview but only nidaq drivers and C language.
Now I'm changing the motherboard...at least until someone explain me how to work around the problem.
No problems with MSI and Intel motherboards.

Maximum Disk-Volume Capacity Solaris 8 supports (SPARC) ?

Any one knows what is the maximum capacity that Solaris 8 on SPARC supports for storage-set ( Raid set, Stripe Set ...)
Can Solaris 8 supports file system up to 2 Terabyes ?
Thanks

Yup.
EOL in November 2002
Which means EOSL November 2007
http://sunsolve.sun.com/handbook_pub/validateUser.do?target=Systems/U10/U10
Unless you've somehow maintained a service contract on that system,
by specific system serial number,
your best bet is to haunt an online auction site (such as Ebay),
and get a replacement cpu or cpus for shelf stock.
Your current OBP patch level is only down two patch levels,
but your kernel patch level is essentially "never patched".
If it were patched better it may have noticed the issue a lot sooner.
Expect to replace that cpu.

Will my motherboard support a 45W processor.

i have a hm77 motherboard and i have a 35w processor. i want to upgrade to a i7 processor. i looked into service manual and found a 45w i7 processor. will my motherboard 682175-001 support it. or will i have to buy a 682174-001 motherboard?

You have an i5-3210m processor and only the Intel HD4000 graphics, at least according to this: Your specs You have this motherboard: For use only on computer models equipped with the Intel UM77 chipset, a 35- W processor, a graphics subsystem with UMA video memory, and the Windows 8 Standard operating system 682177-501 So I stand corrected. The compatibility of processors on your motherboard is determined by the power draw not dual vs. quad. Since your i5-3210m is a 35w processor you can only install a different 35w processor that is listed in the Manual. That would include this one: Intel Quad Core i7-3632QM 2.20-GHz processor (SC turbo up to 3.20-GHz; 1600- MHz FSB, 6.0-MB L3 cache, 35 W) 701658-001 But not any of the 45w processors. Not the i7-3720qm. Sorry the Manual means what it says. What do you think is going to happen if you install one of these i7 processors? You might be surprised that it will only make the computer a little bit faster and will not improve gaming much, if at all if that is what you are trying to do.

H8-1260t / IPISB-CH2 (Chicago) - Can HP add support for Ivy Bridge processors?

The latest UEFI BIOS upgrade for this Sandy Bridge H67-based motherboard is 7.12, dated 10/12/2011. The chipset has the capability to run Ivy Bridge CPUs (released Q4 2011) with a BIOS update to the microcode table (add the CPUID table entries for the 306xx CPUs to the 209xx Sandy Bridge CPUs already in the table, that's all!). I have checked the BIOS using AMI's MMtool, and BIOS ver 7.12 only supports Sandy Bridge CPUs. Can customers using the IPISB-CH2 motherboard, like me, get a BIOS update to support IvyBridge CPUs? -imsai8080 ref:http://www.asrock.com/news/events/2012ivy/ Please note that ASRock is the end-user sales department of Pegatron, which made the IPISB-CH2 motherboard for HP.H67DE3 looks very like the "Chicago" board. further ref:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGA_1155http://www.techpowerup.com/153756/ivy-bridge-quad-core-to-have-77w-tdp-intel-plans-for-lga1155-ivy-bridge-entry.html

Big_Dave wrote:
Hi, The HP H8-1260t PC was Introduced on 13 January 2012. HP generally will only post BIOS updates when needed within twelve months from the Introduction Date (1/13/2012). Some manufacturers have furnished BIOS updates to support IVY Bridge processors for retail motherboards but has has not posted an IVY Bridge BIOS update for the "Chicago" motherboard.Big_Dave wrote:
Hi, The HP H8-1260t PC was Introduced on 13 January 2012. HP generally will only post BIOS updates when needed within twelve months from the Introduction Date (1/13/2012). Some manufacturers have furnished BIOS updates to support IVY Bridge processors for retail motherboards but has has not posted an IVY Bridge BIOS update for the "Chicago" motherboard.VH2:BIOS 7.12A does NOT support Ivy Bridge. I have examined the microcode and there is no support for it, though there is pleanty of room to add it. The BIOS itself is dated 10/12/2011. Simply download the update, change the file extension to .zip, look in the zip, and you'll see the actual mod date for CHG_712_Signed.rom file is 10/12/2011. All they did was update the sp56123.rtf file on 2/14/2012, and later moved it the newer Support format in 4/21/2013 (no files were changed internally). I don't know why they improperly dated it for 4/13. Hope that answers your question, although not the answer either of us wanted.Just to confirm, that's what I'm currently running on a h8-1260t, and 10/12/2011 is the date embedded in the BIOS as well.Big_Dave:Both of us understand that Pegatron is not a retail supplier, and requests for BIOS updates come from the customer, HP. The Ivy Bridge processors were released April 2012, 4 months after the intro of the Chicago board, and ASRock, the *retail* side of Pegatron, announced that all 2nd gen Sandy Bridge mobos (including the H67 motherboards) would have Ivy Bridge support added. IMHO, HP should have requested a BIOS upgrade for their 2nd gen Sandy Bridge Pegatron-based HP motherboards. Obviously, that didn't happen, since their only update is actually dated 10/2011 (see above).It doesn't seem unreasonable to me for HP to drop an request to Pegatron, a *current* motherboard supplier for HP, to cut an upgrade to support the HP motherboards derived fom the retail motherboards Pegatron already have upgraded circa 3 months after the release of the HP (Pegatron) "Chicago" motherboard, which looks AMAZINGLY like the ASRock (Pegatron retail) H67DE3 with the dual graphics support removed (standard for HP), SATA 4 & 5 moved to board edge, and HP proprietary frontpanel connector added in the original place for the H67DE3 SATA 4 & 5 <grin>. Probably a couple minutes with the right BIOS tools and updated microcode from Intel (which I also have!), to support all Chicago-based systems. I'm hoping that maybe a HP Support rep can chime in on this, or someone can tell me where to find tools to recompile to add the SAFUWIN-compatible checksums to a modded BIOS? -Imsai8080 P.S. If it wasn't for the code checksums and the nonstandard SAFUWIN flash programmer, I would already have added the Ivy Bridge microcode myself. Gave it a try, no go so far, but I might keep trying.

Which 10g release supports Solaris x86 version 10?

Hi,
I downloaded Oracle 10.1.0.3 for Solaris x86. When I installed it, I got error, saying I can only install this version on Solaris 9 x86. Do you have any idea which Oracle 10g version supports Solaris x86 version 10?
Thanks
L

Hi,
If we believe metalink, Oracle 10gR1 is already certified for Solaris x86
Solaris Operating System x86 Version 10
Oracle Database - Enterprise Edition Version 10g
Status: Certified
Certification Note:
Install Information:
o 1. Execute runInstaller with the -ignoreSysPrereqs option.
o 2. Select 'Do not create a starter database' when installing Oracle 10g.
o 3. During installation, the warning message 'SUNWsprox package not installed' can be ignored. Press Continue to resume the installation.
o 4. Download and install patch 4186426 from metalink.oracle.com after installing Oracle 10g software.
o 5. If you have an End User Solaris 10 distribution, install the SUNWuiu8 package prior to installing the 10g client.
Have you run installer like recommended in point 1 ?
For 10gR2, you need to wait december for certification.
Nicolas.

Can FW800 133 MHz board from single 1 GHz machine take a dual processor?

I've read in more than one place that the logic board from the 1 GHz FW800 machine can't be used with ANY dual processor. Can anybody tell me with a reasonable degree of certainty whether this is true or not?
Please don't bother answering based on general principles. I already believe -- tell me if I'm wrong -- that every other MDD FW400 or FW800 board CAN take a dual processor and, except for this question, EVERY processor will work EITHER with EVERY 133 MHz board OR with EVERY 167 MHz board.

From my experience the processor card should be compatible, but don't hang me if I'm wrong.
This page showes how to set different multipliers = bus ratios.
So, according to the default multipliers for the MDDs, you get:
6.5x 133 MHz bus = 864.5 MHz CPU (867 MHz)
6.0x 166 MHz bus = 996 MHz CPU (1.0 GHz)
7.5x 166 MHz bus = 1,245 MHz CPU (1.25 GHz)
Thus, if you put a Dual 1.0 GHz onto a 133 MHz board, you'd get not 1.0 GHz but 800 MHz instead (798 MHz to be exact). The same goes for the 1.25 GHz where you'd get 1.0 GHz (997.5 MHz), and for the 1.42 GHz where it'd be 1,1 GHz (1130 MHz, multiplier 8.5x).
6.0x 133 MHz bus = 798.0 MHz CPU (1.0 GHz → 800 MHz)
7.5x 133 MHz bus = 997.5 MHz CPU (1.25 GHz → 1.0 GHz)
8.5x 133 MHz bus = 1,130 MHz CPU (1.42 GHz → 1.1 GHz)
So, if you alter the bus speed of the board (see here, link is from the xlr8yourmac page linked above) you will be able to use the Dual processors for the 166 MHz bus on your 133 MHz board, then overclocked to 166 MHz, at their designed speeds. If you don't what to change the boards system bus speed the processors will just be underclocked, thus run slower – with all the advantages like less power consumption and less heat emission together with a prolonged lifetime.
To fit the 133 MHz system bus you would have to change the multipliers on the processor daughter card to run at the processors native speeds.
Just one example:
1,000 MHz / 133 MHz = 7.5x
So, if you'd want to run a Dual 1.0 GHz processor on a 133 MHz system board you'd have to alter the multiplier from 6.0x (for the original 166 MHz system bus) to 7.5x (for your 133 MHz system bus) – the resistors to change the multiplier reside on the processor daughter board.
That said, keep in mind that this procedure is *NOT tested or confimed*, but it seems logical, doesn't it?
I had a OWC Mercury Extreme 1.4 GHz processor upgrade placed in a Gigabit Ethernet replaced into a Quicksilver (2001 version). As you can see here, it had set the multiplier to 14x to have it run at 1.4 GHz on the Gigabith Ethernet (100 MHz system bus) and I had to set the jumpers to a multiplier of 10.5x for the Quicksilver (133 MHz system bus).
Thus, if I had put the OWC Mercury Extreme running at 1.4 GHz in the 133 MHz bus Quicksilver unmodified back into the 100 MHz bus Gigabit Ethernet, it would run at 1050 MHz (roughly 1.0 GHz).
That's it. There wouldn't be more to it than that, but the latter source (for changing the motherboards system bus speed) states that Apple put in some protection on the processor daughter card to prevent increase in system bus speed if no dual processor is present. Since this doesn't apply to you as you stick to your 133 MHz system bus it shouldn't bother you.
*But don't blame me* if it should turn out to be completely wrong!
Cheers,
Andreas.

Dual Processor P4 motherboards

Anyone know if MSI make a Dual Processor P4 motherboard?. Want to get 2 P4 3.2Ghz processor kit etc built into a Vapochill box. Hope they do make one.

You are out of luck Dude , Because as Matter of Fact, I have never even Heard of a Dual P4 Board , I have Seen Dual Xeon, and Dual Itainium Boards, Because Dual CPU Boards are Mainly Used for servers Not For Desktop and Gaming Use, And they Require 24 Pin PSU's Not the Regular 20 Pin Main Connector... And the Only Manufacturer of Dual CPU Motherboards is TYAN....And the Only Semi-Desktop Dual COU Board that I am aware of, is the TYAN Tiger Dual Athlon MP Board, INTEL Never Intended the Northwood, or Prescott CPU's to Run in a Tandam Configuration, Thats why they Came out with Hyper-Threading Technology, and I am almost positive that is the Closest that you will get to a Dual CPU P4.......You Can Build a Dual Xeon Rig but at $1000+ for Each CPU, for a rig that wont be faster at Most Gaming and regular Desktop apps. then a regular Single "Northwood" P4, and Most Definitely Slower then Either of the Extreme Edition Northwoods (As these EE Northwoods are the Closest thing to a Xeon, as the EE also has a 2MB L-3 Cache)........I could be wrong about the Dual P4 Boards Existance but I doubt it.................Sean REILLY875

Why can't I download 10.4 for my G4 Dual Processor?

I have an older G4 500 mHz Dual Processor Mac and two other macs (iMac & new MacBook Pro). I just purchased Adobe CreativeSuites3 and realized I can't install on my oldest Mac without upgrading the System software. I want to have the same version of CS on all Macs. I looked into upgrading to Leopard and discovered it won't work with my G4. So I went to upgrade from 10.3.9 to 10.4 and it appears that Apple will no longer sell a new version of 10.4! Am I looking in the wrong place? Will my G4 successfully run 10.4? How do I purchase a copy of it?

Tiger is available at many online retailers. Price Grabber has several listed. Make sure to get the full retail version.
Personally, I would stay away from E-Bay. A lot of machine specific versions get sold there, and unless you know what you are looking for, you'll end up with a disk that doesn't even work on your Mac.
Cheers! DALE

Is it manitory to have an airport antenna or can you use it without the antenna (powermac g5 dual processor 10.4.11)

Is it manitory to have an airport antenna or can you use it without the antenna (powermac g5 dual processor 10.4.11)

On the PowerMac G4 I had it had to be connected, but not sure about the model you have. My guess would be yes due to shielding in the case, but would rather wait and hear from someone else.

Where can I get Oracle for solaris x86

Besides click the ContactOTN in web page to submit the question
about this to them, I follow the link
http://platforms.oracle.com/sun/index_sun.htm and click "Ask Us"
link to send message to them too.
Am I wrong ? Can you give me the correct way to ask the question
KK
jeamaro (guest) wrote:
: KK (guest) wrote:
: : I read through the news group and find some mention there is
: : a version Oracle for solaris x86. Then I go to
: : http://platforms.oracle.com/sun/index_sun.htm too.
: : Can anyone tell me the straight method to get it ?
: : I have already sent several mail to ask about that.
: : There is nothing return.
: : KK
: There is a version of Oracle for Solaris x86. Although it has
: not been available thru OTN. To which email ID have you been
: sending your questions?
: Regards
null

Besides click the ContactOTN in web page to submit the question
about this to them, I follow the link
http://platforms.oracle.com/sun/index_sun.htm and click "Ask Us"
link to send message to them too.
Am I wrong ? Can you give me the correct way to ask the question
KK
jeamaro (guest) wrote:
: KK (guest) wrote:
: : I read through the news group and find some mention there is
: : a version Oracle for solaris x86. Then I go to
: : http://platforms.oracle.com/sun/index_sun.htm too.
: : Can anyone tell me the straight method to get it ?
: : I have already sent several mail to ask about that.
: : There is nothing return.
: : KK
: There is a version of Oracle for Solaris x86. Although it has
: not been available thru OTN. To which email ID have you been
: sending your questions?
: Regards
null

Can solaris x86 support VT82C694X dual processor motherboard?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for