Can't Consolidate Referenced Files

When I turn on iCloud Photo Sharing, Photos tells me that referenced files can't be uploaded and that I should consolidate them. I created a smart folder to identify the referenced files but when I try to consolidate, Photos says it can't find the files. However, it shows me the image right on the screen and when I search for it in Spotlight, the file is located in the Photos Master library, it shouldn't be a 'reference' file at all. It seems like the library is corrupt, is there a way to rebuild?
Thanks,
Ron

You can repair by holding down ⌘ and ⌥ when launching the application or you might try just deleting and re-adding these photos if there are just a few.

Similar Messages

  • "Can't move referenced files to trash"

    I was clearing my rejects from a project- 1400 of them! They were all referenced. At the end, I got an error message saying Aperture can't move referenced files to trash because I don't have access to the trash on that volume.
    It removed them from the library but left the images on the drive- 1400 of them! (Seems like it would have let me know BEFORE removing them from the library!)
    Anyway, I isolated them on the drive by relocating the masters that remain in the library which left the files from the removed images in place. It would have been ugly if I were deleting rejects library wide instead of within a single project.
    The permissions in the Get Info window were fine, and the disk is formatted properly so I verified and repaired the disk in Disk Utility. No problems were found, but this resolved the issue of the volume not having access to the trash.
    Anyone else ever seen anything like this?
    DLS

    It doesn't sound like it's an issue with the files themselves, but rather with the trash.
    I haven't seen it, but I can see how that could occur. Each volume tends to have its own Trash folder. It's hidden, typically called .Trashes and at the root of the hard drive. I have had Trash-related issues outside of Aperture in the past (likely of my own doing). The issue with problems like these it it's nigh impossible to establish cause and effect… you could do something and not notice the problem for days or even weeks, in a completely un-related way.
    I doubt that "Repair Permissions" is responsible for the fix, unless the files were on your boot volume. RP has no effect outside of a boot volume.

  • Can't locate Referenced Files in Aperture 3

    All my photo master files are in separate directories on a NAS (network attached storage; 4x1Tb) and I import Projects from that into Aperture on my IMac.  I migrated my MAC Aperture Libraries to a separate external drive and lost some of the references to the Master.  I can reconnect some Projects to the masters on my NAS, but not all.  Some projects won't reconnect using  Locate Referenced Files.  I can find the files and match the photos and Aperture looks like it reconnected, but when I look at the separate images, I get "File not found."  I know the original photos are on my NAS because I can see them using a separate PC hooked into it, but can't seem to complete making the link to the master.  My intent is to move all masters into my Aperture Library because I can't stand losing photos this way anymore, but I need help making that link.  Any ideas what's happening and what to do.
    Even though I have the originals on my NAS, all my processed versions (4 and 5* photos) are in my Aperture Library and I hate to lose those.
    Update: I seem to be able to connect one photo at a time, but selecting an entire set of Project photos and doing "connect all" doesn't seem to be working.  I have thousands of photos and working one at a time is impossible.
    How can I get help?
    <Email Edited By Host>

    I migrated my MAC Aperture Libraries to a separate external drive and lost some of the references to the Master.
    How is your NAS formatted, where your original masters are stored? And how is the external drive formatted that holds your Aperture library?
    Your Aperture library needs to be on a drive formatted Mac OS X extended, Journaled. If the drive should not have that formatting, move the Aperture library to disk with the coorrect format.
    If you cannot reconnect originals, that are clearly there, the reason may be, that your Aperture library needs repairing, see: Repairing and Rebuilding Your Aperture Library: Aperture 3 User Manual
    I'd try to repair permissions and to repair the library, before trying to reconnect again.
    Since you want to consolidate all originals in your Aperture library, I'd try to copy the originals that cannot be recoonected, to the same drive that holds yor aperture libryr and try to reconnect them there, then consolidate them from there. It can be, that the network connection of the NAS is not reliable enough.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • Can't consolidate iTunes files to move to external hard drive. No room on HD!

    Hi,
    Trying to move my iTunes library to External HD, but when I get to the consolidate files part, I get a pop-up saying there is no room to do so...Is there a way around this step? Can I move everything some other way? My HD is soooooo full!
    Thanks!
    Scott

    You can do what Niel recommends but from what you have told us about this issue I think it possibly won't be something solved by a plain "do this" statement.  You may not even need to consolidate.
    If you are consolidating to your HD and it is requiring so much space to do so then it sounds to me like somehow in the past all your media has become scattered around or at least is not in the iTunes preferred structure. It is possible Niels suggestion of moving the iTunes folder first may not apply because the material that is the very reason you are consolidating may not be in your iTunes folder to start with and will get left behind in the dragging prior to consolidating.  Unfortunately consolidating copies files, does not delete them and when you say iTunes is telling you there's too little room then that suggests to me your folder structure is very disorganized (at least iTunes thinks so) because it is copying a lot of files.  In order to resolve this you may need to do some hand consolidating but it would be better to hear from you exactly the state of your library before doing this.  Have you been manually managing media?  If so, where's the majority of your media in your folder structure?
    Here' general background on moving libraries:
    iTunes: How to move [or copy] your music [library] to a new computer [or another drive] - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4527 - a somewhat bewildering and not always easily understandable set of options.
    For the record there's this reference for iTunes 11 but it really doesn't strike me as having the specifics you need. iTunes 11 for Mac: Move your library to another computer - http://support.apple.com/kb/PH12168
    2011 ilounge article: Transferring your iTunes library - http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/articles/comments/moving-your-itunes-library-to -a-new-hard-drive/  - An article with good background information (similar to the links above), particularly if you are not sure your media files are all grouped for quick answer above. Unfortunately under the single term "transferring library" it describes two very different moves; relocating just your media (not  really transferring your library and not recommended unless you really need this configuration), and relocating media+database (really your whole "library").  Make sure you understand the difference before electing to move only media.
    Do not confuse moving your whole folder and library with moving just media files as in
    iTunes for Mac: Moving your iTunes Media folder - http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1449

  • Delete Master and Referenced Files?

    Hi,
    Can master and referenced files be deleted in Aperture?
    Thanks,
    Barb

    Hi, barbfromedmonton,
    why do you ask? The answer depends on what you want to achieve. Are you new to Aperture? You will need a basic understanding of the image management of Aperture, as described in the Aperture 3 User Manual, see the chapter on importing images.
    In short, the master image files are very important to Aperture, and never should be deleted, unless you want to delete an image completely and to remove it from your database.
    For each image you import Aperture will store (or reference) the master image file. This file will be used, if you edit your image to derive and create new versions of the image. One master image file can be used together with many versions of the same image. These version are represented in a very compact and clever way: Aperture only stores the steps how to compute these versions from the master image files, and not the final image itself. In this way Aperture saves space, since the versions are not full duplicates of the original master files, and you can have many versions of the same image without much additional storage required.
    But a version without its master file cannot be exported in full resolution and cannot be edited. Without the master image files you will be left with previews in poor resolution.
    In Aperture it is pointless to ask about deleting master files. If you want to edit an image in your Aperture Library you need the master image file too; and if you don't want an image in your library any longer, then just delete all its versions and you will delete the master image file too (there are advanced options too).
    If the reason for question is, that your Aperture library is very large and you need to free space on your system drive, then post back and tell us what you want to achieve. Aperture offers the possibility to store the master image files outside the Aperture library as referenced masters, so that the library itself can be considerably smaller.
    Regards
    Léonie

  • How can my own hard drive be considered off line to find referenced files?

    my iPhoto library for some reason could not be imported to Aperture when I converted to Aperture.
    However, I selected the option to create a referenced library and it worked fine.
    I upgraded my hard drive from 160 to 750 at a professional apple reseller and they copied all of my data, programs etc as well.
    While I never checked to see if this was the case before, becuase I had no reason to check for it, I notice now that all of the aperture thumbnails have the "reference offline" icon and when i try to "locate reference", I can do so, but Aperture still considers my own hard drive offline!!!   How's that for strange. 

    Every hard drive has a volume name (they also have a UUID but I don't think Aperture cares about that.)  If the new drive was not given the same name as your old drive then as far as Aperture is concerned, the drive it's looking for is not present (it's looking for a drive with a specific name and not finding it.)
    While YOU know that all the data on the old hard drive was copied to the new hard drive, Aperture doesn't know that (and makes no assumptions).  So if the volume name it's looking for isn't found, then the drive is "offline". Aperture is working as it should.
    You could rename the hard drive back to the original name, but then that would just cause it lose all any new 'referenced' masters you added since upgrading the drive.
    To fix:
    You'll need to reconnect the masters.  In the lower right corner of the thumbnail you should see a small icon which ordinarily has a tiny rectangle with an arrow pointing away (indicating this image is a "referenced" master).  If the master is missing you'll have a little orange triangle with the "!" inside it (indicating a problem).
    In the main menu, select "File" -> "Locate Referenced Files..."
    A box will appear and you can check the box which reads "Show Only Files Not Found" (this will hide all the files which are currently fine so that you only have to deal with the files that have a problem.)
    In the lower part of the panel is filesystem browser.  You can navigate to the directory drive & directory where these files are located and click "Reconnect" or, if they're all in the same place, "Reconnect All". 
    Pick "Done" when you've finished.
    If you don't like using "referenced" masters, you can tell Aperture to bring the masters into the Aperture Library so that it will manage the files for you (and avoid this problem in the future).  In the main menu pick "File" -> "Consolidate Masters".  You'll be given the choice to "copy" the files (it'll copy the masters but still leave the old files back in their original locations... but Aperture will no longer need those originals.)  or you can "move" the files (Aperture will copy them into the library then delete the original after the copy is completed... effectively "migrating" the masters into your library and cleaning up the originals when it's done.
    Regards,
    Tim

  • I am using itunes 10 and trying to consolidate my files.  I keep getting the error "Copying files failed.  The file name was invalid or too long".  How can I indentify what file is causing this problem or resolve this issue?

    I am using itunes 10 and trying to consolidate my files.  I keep getting the error "Copying files failed.  The file name was invalid or too long".  How can I indentify what file is causing this problem or resolve this issue?

    BUMP
    Yes, I just get that message. I don't see how I could investigate this problem.
    I didn't mention that this happened when I was consolidating my library, not copying files to another computer.
    In other words, I'm using a "normal" itunes procedure, itunes won't complete it, and won't tell me exactly why or how to figure out how to fix it...
    Is there at least some easy way to tell which files were successfully copied to my itunes music folder so I can work on moving the uncopied files?
    Can anybody help me?

  • IPhoto: After I've changed the file name/format in Finder iPhoto can't load/relink to the referenced file.

    After I've changed the file name/format in Finder iPhoto can't load/relink to the referenced file anymore. For some reasons I don't like to reimport the file.

    Hmm the advice has been not to use referenced libraries - you ignored and did it anyway and you find the advise not helpful
    Furthermore the advice is that if you choose to use a referenced library that you assure that the path never changes - you also choose to ignore that advice and do it anyway - and you blame the peopson trying to help you
    once again - you have one choice - change the file names back and put the files back in the exact same place - and again you are totally ignoring the advice and instead name calling and attacking the person giving you advice
    Maybe life would be easier if you followed advice rather than ignoring it and then complaining that things no longer work
    change the name back and you will be fine until the next problem you hit that is caused by choosing a referenced library
    Have a nice day
    LN

  • Aperture: After changed the file name in Finder Aperture can't load the referenced file anymore

    After I've changed the file name/format in Finder Aperture can't load/relink to the referenced file anymore. For some reasons I don't like to reimport the file.

    As you told, the command "Locate Referenced File" doesn't work, if the filename doen't match exactly. And the filenames should keep their new names.
    "Locate Referenced File" will be able to reconnect one file at a time, if you direct Aperture to the matching file in the Loate Referenced File dialog, but it will not be able to recognise the other matching referenced files and to reconnect them all at once with the "Reconnect All" button.
    It will be a lot of work to reconnect the one by one.  Usually it is much easier to rename the original master files using Metadata > Batch change in Aperture than to try to do that in the Finder.

  • Can I take a managed file and link it to a referenced file?

    Is this possible?
    I am creating a referenced library. Going forward, I know that I need to use only the referenced file to make new versions within Aperture.  But going back through my old files, I have originals and then all the edited copies.  These are only linked together in my head, because my practice was to make a copy of an original before working on it, so when Aperture imports it, it sees my copy as a new "original". I wondered if it is possible to reestablish any kind of link between my edited copies and the actual original file.
    Thank you.
    LCA

    Sorry not possible. To Aperture every file imported is an original (master). There is no way to say this import is a version of that original.
    You can come close using keywords and possibly stacks. It's not exactly what you are looking to do but at least you'll be bale to locate and group all similar images.

  • New user here.  Trying to import iPhoto 9.4.2 libraries into Aperture 3.4.3 as referenced files. When accessing File Import Library, it finds the iPhoto library just fine, but then imports it as Master files. No option that I can find to leave the photos

    New user here.  Trying to import iPhoto 9.4.2 libraries into Aperture 3.4.3 as referenced files. When accessing File>Import>Library, it finds the iPhoto library just fine, but then imports it as Master files. No option that I can find to leave the photos in place on the file system.  All the literature says their should be an option to choose, but I never get that option.  What?

    All the literature says their should be an option to choose, but I never get that option.
    That has been true for the previous Aperture versions. Now Aperture simply treats the original image files exactly as they are in the imported library. Referenced images will stay referenced, managed will be imported as managed. But you can always relocate the imported managed images afterwards by using "File > Relocate".
    Regards
    Léonie

  • I have one folder with several projects all of which Aperure can not find the original.  I do not use referenced files.  I can't make any adjustments like cropping etc. What can I do to print any of these photos?

    I have one folder with several projects all of which Aperure can not find the original.  I do not use referenced files.  I can't make any adjustments like cropping etc. What can I do to adjust or print any of these photos?  IO have no ther projects with this problem.  My Aperture Library is automatically saved to two external drives.
    Dick Koos

    I have one folder with several projects all of which Aperure can not find the original.
    Have you checked inside your Aperture library, if the original files are still there?
    Try to find out, when the images in those projects have been originally imported, then open the Aperture library by ctrl-clicking it and using the command "Show package contents" from the pop-up menu. In the window that will open, select the folder "Masters" and browse the contents. You need to find the subfolder with the year you imported the images, then the folders with the month and the day.
    Are your original files still there?
    If yes, copy them to a folder on your desktop for safe-keeping, and then try, if repairing the permissions and the other Furst Aid tools will help Aperture to connect to these missing files again - see this link:  Repairing and Rebuilding Your Aperture Library: Aperture 3 User Manual
    If the First Aid Tools don't help, then check, if Aperture has moved the missing images to a "recovered folder". If not, reimport the images, you saved to your Desktop and use the Lift&Stamp tool to transfer any adjustment and captions to your reimported images.

  • How can I import Master files from my iPhoto library to my Aperture lib?...

    ... That is knowing that I have already imported all my iPhoto library but I selected the option "in their current location" from the "store files" pop-up menu.
    So right now, all my pictures are referenced images in Aperture but stored in their current locations on the iPhoto folder.
    I simply want to get the masters back into Aperture.
    How can I do that?
    Thanks a lot for you help

    There are some tutorials here
    http://www.apple.com/aperture/tutorials/
    one of which is specific to Aperture/iPhoto
    Essentially though what you are wanting to do with your referenced master files is to
    File/Consolidate Master/
    Definitely worth having a read of the pro's and cons of managed vs referenced files.
    RB maintains a great site with a wealth of ideas on workflows, worth having a erad of these.
    http://photo.rwboyer.com/
    Tony

  • File paths and archiving (and referenced files).

    I've come to the stage where I need to start using referenced files (out of disk space on my laptop) and also start archiving projects. One of my plans was to start keeping an off-site backup of all the originals in case something really bad happened. I'm also going to have on-site backup of projects. But for the off-site originals I would like to have some simple way of finding the photos in case something bad happens, my idea was to simply create a PDF from the list view where I could see the photo and the file path to where it's stored (I plan to store them in simple year-month-day hierarchy).
    The reason why I'm not going to archive the projects off-site is simply the cost, I did a test yesterday and it looks like just storing the originals would be approx 1/3 in size of the projects.
    If someone has a better idea of how to handle this please let me knoe

    I'll try to explain.
    About the cost: Hard disk space is really cheap and I can not see how the cost should be that expensive. This is based on your statement that you still have your images on your laptop and that itself limits the amount of space hence a rather small library.
    When it comes to backing up your projects you have several options. First, if you really want to be cheap about hard disk space (I think you should not since your images really are priceless) you can export projects of your referenced images and not consolidate the images into the exported project. Not to consolidate vs. consolidate images on export really makes a difference in the exported project size. On the other hand, not consolidate images on export of a project makes you back up your images separately, which leads to more work.
    My advice is then; buy two disks (preferable three disks), and export your projects with the images consolidated into one of them and start using the other one with your referenced images.
    I always advice users to have their images in at least three different locations and IMHO the ideal solution for you would be to have your images referenced on one disk and mirrored backups on the other two disks, either one stored in two different locations in case of burglary, fire etc.
    Regards
    Paul K

  • Consolidate linked files in multitrack?

    Is there an easy way to consolidate all of the linked files referenced in a multitrack document into a single folder, something like the "package" function in inDesign?

    In previous versions of Audition, yes, but not yet in this version.
    I know you're probably trying to avoid this sort of work, but here's how I'd do it in this version of Audition.
    With only one Session Open, choose File > Close Unused Media (this will close any media files that aren't referenced by that session)
    For each of the files in the files panel
    right-click and choose "Reveal in Explorer" aka "Reveal in Finder" (Win vs Mac), this command should also be in the File menu
    copy or move the desired file into the new folder of your choice
    Close all files in Audition
    Copy or Move the Session file to the folder used above
    Reopen the session in the new location
    Save the session.
    Note: The SESX (session) file stores both absolute paths to your files as well as relative paths for the referenced media files.   I can't remember off the top of my head which one it looks for first, but it will use one or the other as a fallback.   If it can't find the files in either of those locations (you can just open the SESX file in a text or XML editor to see where it is looking) it will look in the folder that the SESX is in as a fallback to those.   That is the reason why I was suggesting resaving in Step 6.   You can also see where Audition found the files by looking in the Files Panel in Audition after you've opened the session.   Just scroll the panel all the way to the right and you'll see the file paths.
    If you don't need to save effects and stuff like that, there's an alternative, but sketchy way to archive stuff and that would be to export the session as an OMF file with encapsulated media.   This will store the actual audio data into one big file.   However, I saw sketchy because there's a lot of caveats to that method (too numerous to list here).   But it would work for simple sessions.
    For the purposes of feature development in Audition, what do you like about the Package workflow in InDesign; how would you expect it to work in Audition?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cash discount not accepted while posting in outgoing payments(F-53)

    Hi, Here i entered Invoice Rs.50,000 in FB60 through terms of 002, Againest this invoice i make a payment in F-53 on the same day so i get  Rs.1500 as discount againest this invoice. acctually entry like  as below Vendor account Dr         50,000 To

  • Changed apple ID has caused loss of access to email on macbook but not phone

    I have a MacBook Air and a iphone 6 plus. I just upgraded the Macbook to Yosemite. I have 3 email accounts that I use. A hotmail, a gmail and a me.com. I changed my apple ID because it is linked to an old hotmail account that I cannot access. This se

  • Open source projects based on Oracle technology

    Hello: Here's a project for the open source page at Open Source Projects for Oracle: http://www.oracle.com/technology/tech/opensource/projects.html The open source (GPL) ValueObjects Framework for ADF is available for download. It is a JDeveloper 10g

  • Unable to Connect to Human @ Customer Service

    Post Hack, I called Customer Service to find another accomodation for the privacy breach because I already have Experian.  As well, I cancelled a subscription to Send Now. Not only was the breach of privacy the day I subscribed but the format did not

  • Recording without the mouse

    Hi there, is there a shortcut/command on the keyboard to start recording? Without using the mouse & hitting the big red button? Please? Cheers